Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328274 > unrolled thread
| Started by | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-25 13:07 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-10-26 13:24 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 246 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 13:07 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 13:33 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 13:46 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2015-10-26 13:39 +1000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 23:38 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-10-26 13:33 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 09:53 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-29 09:42 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-26 04:36 -0500
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 09:59 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-26 11:19 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-10-26 13:36 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:02 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Windows crapware doesn't ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 18:09 +0000
More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-26 09:23 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-10-26 13:38 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:01 -0700
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 10:13 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 19:38 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-28 00:54 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-27 21:48 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 22:59 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-28 08:57 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-29 19:57 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 15:19 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-29 19:31 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 22:40 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-28 04:06 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:53 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-28 14:08 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-28 09:20 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-28 14:24 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-28 09:38 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 12:03 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-28 13:43 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-28 09:54 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 12:05 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-28 18:57 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-28 15:04 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 20:20 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 10:07 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 08:27 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:12 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-29 09:36 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 08:31 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 08:37 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 14:45 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 09:51 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 14:53 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:19 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-29 16:00 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:33 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-29 15:57 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:18 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:17 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 20:27 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:38 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 21:41 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 10:18 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-30 10:57 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:37 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 17:27 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-30 11:11 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 12:57 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:38 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 02:47 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 08:46 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:15 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:17 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:31 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:18 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:55 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:14 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 14:17 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 14:03 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 14:23 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 15:36 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:15 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 21:25 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 21:36 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 21:45 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:25 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:46 -0700
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:42 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-30 10:59 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:39 -0600
So elucidate, oh intellectual superior. LOL!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:40 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 19:58 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:49 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-30 11:02 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-30 16:33 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 13:07 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:43 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:43 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:42 -0600
OTW, you diss OpenSuse and dodge the bullet. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:40 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:47 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:13 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 18:21 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:40 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 20:25 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:10 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 23:16 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 18:42 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:51 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:18 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:52 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 10:17 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:50 -0700
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:46 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 17:29 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:50 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 10:15 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-30 10:56 +0000
Go back to licking urinals, dumb willie. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:48 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 08:57 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 14:31 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:36 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 14:39 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-30 13:46 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 10:18 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:35 -0400
Go eat another turd, Turdv. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:50 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:50 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-30 13:44 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:49 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-30 11:05 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 12:15 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:38 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 12:54 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 17:53 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 13:03 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 18:09 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 13:23 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 18:36 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 15:37 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:55 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 15:34 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 15:35 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:54 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 16:10 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:12 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 13:19 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 18:34 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 15:35 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:56 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:51 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:48 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:17 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 14:26 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:44 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 10:03 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:17 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 10:27 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:34 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 10:39 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:47 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:01 -0700
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:32 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 10:34 -0700
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 14:08 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 17:33 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:16 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 14:36 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 11:15 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:35 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 13:04 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 13:09 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 14:01 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 17:31 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-30 11:09 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 17:31 -0400
Says the freaky janitor. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:17 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:59 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:58 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 16:55 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:18 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 13:57 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-29 17:54 +0000
During a system update? You are an idiot. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:53 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:42 -0700
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 20:20 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 20:36 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 23:10 +0100
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 19:53 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:15 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:05 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:31 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-29 17:10 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:24 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:22 -0600
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 10:42 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 12:01 -0500
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 17:26 +0000
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 10:40 -0400
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 22:21 -0700
Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-28 18:39 -0600
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 09:35 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 09:51 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 18:08 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 14:54 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 14:52 -0500
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:02 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:26 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 15:51 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:01 +0100
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 18:05 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-30 21:09 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 19:03 -0700
Linux just works - trolls don't work, apparently Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-31 07:33 -0400
Re: Linux just works - trolls don't work, apparently Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 08:51 -0400
Re: Linux just works - trolls don't work, apparently Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 13:25 +0000
Re: Linux just works - trolls don't work, apparently GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:22 -0600
Re: Linux just works - trolls don't work, apparently GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:21 -0600
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:20 -0600
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:16 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 19:02 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 23:16 -0400
Kelsey Bjarnason is all kinds of fucked up. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-31 03:48 -0700
Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is all kinds of fucked up. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:32 -0700
Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is all kinds of fucked up. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-31 22:06 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-31 08:26 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 13:24 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:34 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:08 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 09:42 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:24 -0600
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:28 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:08 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:41 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:44 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:20 -0600
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-26 22:14 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Windows just blows chunks ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 04:26 +0000
Re: Linux just works - Windows just blows chunks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 21:52 -0700
Re: Windows just works - Linux blows chunks Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 08:20 -0400
That's because windows can't stand the smell of an unwashed linux advocate. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-27 16:20 -0600
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-26 16:15 -0600
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 18:49 -0400
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 21:36 -0500
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 20:49 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 07:59 -0400
Maybes and probablies aren't a metric JED. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-27 16:22 -0600
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 14:42 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:25 -0700
Re: Linux just works - Ubuntu crapware only has 119,454 open bugs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:24 -0700
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 11:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <D257B6B6.61F51%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329504 |
On 10/29/15, 10:21 AM, in article n0tkem$laf$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another >>>> weakness in the Linux package management system(s). >>> >>> So what you are trying is just another attempt to smear one of linux >>> strenght into a "weakness". >>> Because your loved wintendo has nothing even close >> >> The very fact that there even ARE dependency issues and conflicts is >> indeed a weakness of Linux. No amount of your allemande will change that. > > No. Those missing dependencies are easily to overcome if you know how. You > obviously don't have the tiniest of clues And you obviously have no clue either or you would have listed the steps. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 20:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <n0trdb$kav$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329530 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 10/29/15, 10:21 AM, in article n0tkem$laf$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >>>>> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another >>>>> weakness in the Linux package management system(s). >>>> >>>> So what you are trying is just another attempt to smear one of linux >>>> strenght into a "weakness". >>>> Because your loved wintendo has nothing even close >>> >>> The very fact that there even ARE dependency issues and conflicts is >>> indeed a weakness of Linux. No amount of your allemande will change >>> that. >> >> No. Those missing dependencies are easily to overcome if you know how. >> You obviously don't have the tiniest of clues > > And you obviously have no clue either or you would have listed the steps. > No. He made the claim that there are "issues". He should name them, and be very accurate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 20:36 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <n0tsb7$lth$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329544 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 10/29/15, 12:20 PM, in article n0trdb$kav$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 10/29/15, 10:21 AM, in article n0tkem$laf$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another >>>>>>> weakness in the Linux package management system(s). >>>>>> >>>>>> So what you are trying is just another attempt to smear one of linux >>>>>> strenght into a "weakness". >>>>>> Because your loved wintendo has nothing even close >>>>> >>>>> The very fact that there even ARE dependency issues and conflicts is >>>>> indeed a weakness of Linux. No amount of your allemande will change >>>>> that. >>>> >>>> No. Those missing dependencies are easily to overcome if you know how. >>>> You obviously don't have the tiniest of clues >>> >>> And you obviously have no clue either or you would have listed the >>> steps. >>> >> >> No. He made the claim that there are "issues". He should name them, and >> be very accurate > > So you now say the issues which you are say are easy to overcome are not > issues you even accept exist. > > Do you ever even TRY to be consistent from one post to the next? > I said the "issues" are so easy to overcome that it is laughable to claim that they are showstoppers. It amounts to agree to change some libraries from the distro supplied ones to the ones of the repo. Only you illiterate cretins see a problem where people who can actually read just click "OK"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 23:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <n0u5dc$r33$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329549 |
Snit wrote: > On 10/29/15, 12:36 PM, in article n0tsb7$lth$4@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 10/29/15, 12:20 PM, in article n0trdb$kav$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>>> >>>>> On 10/29/15, 10:21 AM, in article n0tkem$laf$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another >>>>>>>>> weakness in the Linux package management system(s). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So what you are trying is just another attempt to smear one of >>>>>>>> linux strenght into a "weakness". >>>>>>>> Because your loved wintendo has nothing even close >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The very fact that there even ARE dependency issues and conflicts is >>>>>>> indeed a weakness of Linux. No amount of your allemande will change >>>>>>> that. >>>>>> >>>>>> No. Those missing dependencies are easily to overcome if you know >>>>>> how. You obviously don't have the tiniest of clues >>>>> >>>>> And you obviously have no clue either or you would have listed the >>>>> steps. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No. He made the claim that there are "issues". He should name them, and >>>> be very accurate >>> >>> So you now say the issues which you are say are easy to overcome are not >>> issues you even accept exist. >>> >>> Do you ever even TRY to be consistent from one post to the next? >> >> I said the "issues" are so easy to overcome that it is laughable to claim >> that they are showstoppers. > > So you admit there are issues... then whine that they were not named. > > In other words you cannot stay consistent from one post to the next. Fine. > >> It amounts to agree to change some libraries >> from the distro supplied ones to the ones of the repo. > > And this should be done to fix an issue you, above, said was not > named?!?!?! > > Again, complete inconsistency from you. Idiot. Your "reading copmprehension" is snittish. Non-existant. What will be left of those "issues" if you are able to read simple sentences? Right. Nothing The problem with you dimbulbs is that you are unable to comprehend words which have more than 3 letters.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 19:53 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <B9ydnfTiP_g7UK_LnZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329544 |
On 10/29/15 13:20, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 10/29/15, 10:21 AM, in article n0tkem$laf$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann"<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>>>>> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another >>>>>> weakness in the Linux package management system(s). >>>>> >>>>> So what you are trying is just another attempt to smear one of linux >>>>> strenght into a "weakness". >>>>> Because your loved wintendo has nothing even close >>>> >>>> The very fact that there even ARE dependency issues and conflicts is >>>> indeed a weakness of Linux. No amount of your allemande will change >>>> that. >>> >>> No. Those missing dependencies are easily to overcome if you know how. >>> You obviously don't have the tiniest of clues >> >> And you obviously have no clue either or you would have listed the steps. >> > > No. He made the claim that there are "issues". He should name them, and be > very accurate > What for? You never back up any of your bullshit claims, moron. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 10:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <slrnn34e1f.1ld.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #329378 |
On 2015-10-29, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:36:42 +0000, William Poaster wrote: > >> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >> >>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:57:23 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>> >>>>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:43:36 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Little prat in a Small Puddle wrote: >>>>>>>> [deletia] >>>> Duh? >>>> The context was adding additional repositories. >>>> Do try to keep up. >>> >>> That's only relevant if it's necessary. I can't speak to Suse, but it >>> generally is not with Ubunutu. Perhaps that's why you decided to pick on >>> Suse instead. You thought it would be obscure enough that people wouldn't >>> call you out on your obvious bullshit. >> >> Exactly. As I pointed out, you can add those repositories or *not*. >> Generally they aren't necessary. And the trolling fuckwit *originally* >> posted: "First the user has to know the repositories exist in the first >> place." Then when called on his idiocy, had to google for something to back >> up his strawman argument. > > Wrong again Wideload. > I shot your argument right into one of your toilets by posting what Suse > has to say about possible problems adding additional repositories. > > You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another weakness > in the Linux package management system(s). Nope. We don't like it because it's simply a lie. The WHOLE POINT of having a good respository system is that it is fairly comprehensive BY DEFAULT. This is in contrast to something like Mandrake or old RedHat where everything isn't at your fingertips. The disclaimers from Suse are just that... disclaimers. Honest disclaimers for Windows would sound much worse, MacOS probably too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <1rzkwbhoatef3.m2en2rfdqvkq.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #329430 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:15:59 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-10-29, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:36:42 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >> >>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:57:23 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:43:36 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Little prat in a Small Puddle wrote: >>>>>>>>> > > [deletia] > >>>>> Duh? >>>>> The context was adding additional repositories. >>>>> Do try to keep up. >>>> >>>> That's only relevant if it's necessary. I can't speak to Suse, but it >>>> generally is not with Ubunutu. Perhaps that's why you decided to pick on >>>> Suse instead. You thought it would be obscure enough that people wouldn't >>>> call you out on your obvious bullshit. >>> >>> Exactly. As I pointed out, you can add those repositories or *not*. >>> Generally they aren't necessary. And the trolling fuckwit *originally* >>> posted: "First the user has to know the repositories exist in the first >>> place." Then when called on his idiocy, had to google for something to back >>> up his strawman argument. >> >> Wrong again Wideload. >> I shot your argument right into one of your toilets by posting what Suse >> has to say about possible problems adding additional repositories. >> >> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another weakness >> in the Linux package management system(s). > > Nope. We don't like it because it's simply a lie. You you are claiming Suse are liars. That's funny coming from an imbecile like you. https://en.opensuse.org/Additional_package_repositories his is a list of currently existing third-party repositories, meaning they're external to openSUSE. These packages are not supported by openSUSE, the packages may not be tested and the repositories can contain beta versions and other bleeding edge packages. For official repositories (OSS, non-OSS, Update, Update-Non-OSS) and semi official repositories (including KDE, GNOME and Java repositories) see Package repositories. For information on how to add package repositories see Add package repositories. For new Linux and openSUSE users it is recommended to use the 4 default repositories (OSS, Non-OSS, Update, Update-Non-OSS) and Packman. Later on when you familiarize yourself with package management you can add more. Please, make sure that you actually need a specific repository instead of blindly adding it. More repositories means more complexity in software management and needs some experience to avoid problems and, in extreme cases, system failure. Warning Use it at your own risk. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 11:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <slrnn34ifn.4rj.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #329449 |
On 2015-10-29, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:15:59 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:36:42 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>> >>>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:57:23 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:43:36 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Little prat in a Small Puddle wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >> >> [deletia] >> >>>>>> Duh? >>>>>> The context was adding additional repositories. >>>>>> Do try to keep up. >>>>> >>>>> That's only relevant if it's necessary. I can't speak to Suse, but it >>>>> generally is not with Ubunutu. Perhaps that's why you decided to pick on >>>>> Suse instead. You thought it would be obscure enough that people wouldn't >>>>> call you out on your obvious bullshit. >>>> >>>> Exactly. As I pointed out, you can add those repositories or *not*. >>>> Generally they aren't necessary. And the trolling fuckwit *originally* >>>> posted: "First the user has to know the repositories exist in the first >>>> place." Then when called on his idiocy, had to google for something to back >>>> up his strawman argument. >>> >>> Wrong again Wideload. >>> I shot your argument right into one of your toilets by posting what Suse >>> has to say about possible problems adding additional repositories. >>> >>> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another weakness >>> in the Linux package management system(s). >> >> Nope. We don't like it because it's simply a lie. > > You you are claiming Suse are liars. > That's funny coming from an imbecile like you. Not liars, paranoid. It's a common legal problem. [deletia] There's a cooking show that used to make fun of this stuff. Anything that was a sufficiently paranoid would trigger comic bits with lawyers and members of law enforcement looking like "men in black". It's much like how ANY software you care to name disclaims the UCC.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 17:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <7h0agc-6j4.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #329492 |
It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: > On 2015-10-29, Small Sprat in a Toilet Bowl wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:15:59 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:36:42 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>> >>>>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:57:23 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:43:36 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Little prat in a Small Puddle wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>> [deletia] >>> >>>>>>> Duh? >>>>>>> The context was adding additional repositories. >>>>>>> Do try to keep up. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's only relevant if it's necessary. I can't speak to Suse, but it >>>>>> generally is not with Ubunutu. Perhaps that's why you decided to pick on >>>>>> Suse instead. You thought it would be obscure enough that people wouldn't >>>>>> call you out on your obvious bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> Exactly. As I pointed out, you can add those repositories or *not*. >>>>> Generally they aren't necessary. And the trolling fuckwit *originally* >>>>> posted: "First the user has to know the repositories exist in the first >>>>> place." Then when called on his idiocy, had to google for something to back >>>>> up his strawman argument. >>>> >>>> Wrong again Wideload. >>>> I shot your argument right into one of your toilets by posting what Suse >>>> has to say about possible problems adding additional repositories. >>>> >>>> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another weakness >>>> in the Linux package management system(s). >>> >>> Nope. We don't like it because it's simply a lie. >> >> You you are claiming Suse are liars. >> That's funny coming from an imbecile like you. > > Not liars, paranoid. It's a common legal problem. The *lie* is coming from the Small Sprat in a Toilet Bowl moron. The troll hasn't a clue WTF it's babbling about. > [deletia] > > There's a cooking show that used to make fun of this stuff. Anything that > was a sufficiently paranoid would trigger comic bits with lawyers and members > of law enforcement looking like "men in black". > > It's much like how ANY software you care to name disclaims the UCC. -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.2.2-1.gb3ecf72-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Sep 29 18:51:15 UTC 2015 (b3ecf72) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:24 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <Puqdnc7KY_PF-a_LnZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329492 |
On 10/29/15 10:31, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-10-29, Big Fish in a Small Crotch<bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:15:59 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29, Big Fish in a Small Crotch<bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:36:42 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>> >>>>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch<bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:57:23 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch<bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:43:36 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Little prat in a Small Puddle wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>> [deletia] >>> >>>>>>> Duh? >>>>>>> The context was adding additional repositories. >>>>>>> Do try to keep up. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's only relevant if it's necessary. I can't speak to Suse, but it >>>>>> generally is not with Ubunutu. Perhaps that's why you decided to pick on >>>>>> Suse instead. You thought it would be obscure enough that people wouldn't >>>>>> call you out on your obvious bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> Exactly. As I pointed out, you can add those repositories or *not*. >>>>> Generally they aren't necessary. And the trolling fuckwit *originally* >>>>> posted: "First the user has to know the repositories exist in the first >>>>> place." Then when called on his idiocy, had to google for something to back >>>>> up his strawman argument. >>>> >>>> Wrong again Wideload. >>>> I shot your argument right into one of your toilets by posting what Suse >>>> has to say about possible problems adding additional repositories. >>>> >>>> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another weakness >>>> in the Linux package management system(s). >>> >>> Nope. We don't like it because it's simply a lie. >> >> You you are claiming Suse are liars. >> That's funny coming from an imbecile like you. > > Not liars, paranoid. It's a common legal problem. > > [deletia] > > There's a cooking show that used to make fun of this stuff. Anything that > was a sufficiently paranoid would trigger comic bits with lawyers and members > of law enforcement looking like "men in black". > > It's much like how ANY software you care to name disclaims the UCC. Yet ol' Jed refused to address the link provided to OpenSuse on repositories. It figures. Lies by ommission, eh JED? Guffaw!!! -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:22 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <Puqdnc_KY_N8_q_LnZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329430 |
On 10/29/15 09:15, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-10-29, Big Fish in a Small Crotch<bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:36:42 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >> >>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch<bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:57:23 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch<bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:43:36 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Little prat in a Small Puddle wrote: >>>>>>>>> > > [deletia] > >>>>> Duh? >>>>> The context was adding additional repositories. >>>>> Do try to keep up. >>>> >>>> That's only relevant if it's necessary. I can't speak to Suse, but it >>>> generally is not with Ubunutu. Perhaps that's why you decided to pick on >>>> Suse instead. You thought it would be obscure enough that people wouldn't >>>> call you out on your obvious bullshit. >>> >>> Exactly. As I pointed out, you can add those repositories or *not*. >>> Generally they aren't necessary. And the trolling fuckwit *originally* >>> posted: "First the user has to know the repositories exist in the first >>> place." Then when called on his idiocy, had to google for something to back >>> up his strawman argument. >> >> Wrong again Wideload. >> I shot your argument right into one of your toilets by posting what Suse >> has to say about possible problems adding additional repositories. >> >> You Linux loons just don't like it because it exposes yet another weakness >> in the Linux package management system(s). > > Nope. We don't like it because it's simply a lie. > > The WHOLE POINT of having a good respository system is that it is fairly > comprehensive BY DEFAULT. This is in contrast to something like Mandrake or > old RedHat where everything isn't at your fingertips. Sure it is Jed, sure it is. OpenSuse updates don't always work because OpenSuse didn't include all of the necessary repositories. So where you get them and from where? IT IS a mess! > > The disclaimers from Suse are just that... disclaimers. > > Honest disclaimers for Windows would sound much worse, MacOS probably too. More FUD. At least there is only ONE repository for windows. No unmet dependencies. The same for OS X. MacOS is from the previous generation in case you brain hurts. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 10:42 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <n0qmpd$dti$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329122 |
On 2015-10-28 9:24 AM, Peter the klöwnish, trölling jabröni attacked an intellectual superior. < snip > -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 12:01 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <slrnn31vs2.ed1.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #329121 |
On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:08:59 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> Charmed Tuna wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-27 10:40 PM, DFS wrote: >>>> On 10/27/2015 7:54 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/26/2015 9:23 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>>> Ron House wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 26/10/15 03:33, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2015-10-25 1:07 PM, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>>> 59378 New bugs >>>>>>>>>> 119454 Open bugs >>>>>>>>>> 1239 In-progress bugs >>>>>>>>>> 288 Critical bugs >>>>>>>>>> 4623 High importance bugs >>>>>>>>>> 1231 Incomplete bugs (can expire) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Linux just works. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As has been pointed out countless times, no one but scum like you >>>>>>>> ever says "Linux just works". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I remember the big brouhaha when Win 2000 (IIRC) came out with 64000 >>>>>>> open >>>>>>> bugs, and that was just the OS! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Microsoft is estimating that 28,000 of these are likely to be "real" >>>>>> problems." >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.zdnet.com/article/bugfest-win2000-has-63000-defects/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ubuntu, like other distros, counts bugs in >>>>>>> the *thousands* of other packages it includes in its distro. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ubuntu doesn't include *thousands* of packages, liar. The default >>>>>> install has a few dozen, if that. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You are "right", od course. Around 12 thousand dozens >>>> >>>> >>>> Install Ubuntu and you get a few dozen apps. Many thousands are >>>> available, but they're not included with the distributon. >>>> >>>> More idiocy by dumbkopf. What's wrong with you? >>> >>> Actually, I think that Peter is referring to the fact that the operating >>> system itself is a combination of packages. You're speaking of >>> applications whereas he seems to be talking about their libraries and >>> including them in the term "package." >>> >> >> Wrong, as usual. No surprise from you here >> >> What cretinous dimbulb has postulated that all available packages absolutely >> *have* *to* come with the base distro? Who is that abjectly stupid that he >> can't include additional repos with some mouseclicks? > > About 99 percent of end users which is one reason why Linux is doing so > miserably as a desktop alternative to Windows. > > First the user has to know the repositories exist in the first place. Nope. Besides this is no worse than a Windows or Mac user needing to know where to get 3rd party software for that platform. A suitable number of repositories are pre-installed and work just like the Apple store (that's a knock-off of apt-get). > Then the user has to make sure he doesn't include something which will > conflict with the other repositories and make a mess of things. Possible but not likely. > That's the problem with Linux. People aren't interested in wasting time > fucking with it. > Nope. That's just your own twisted fantasy. If people are so timid and frightened, they shouldn't be doing random things with ANY OS. They aren't going to experiment with weird things that will blow their system up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 17:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <d9ceq3FpcgnU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #329203 |
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:01:54 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-10-28, Big Fish in a Small Crotch > <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:08:59 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> Charmed Tuna wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-27 10:40 PM, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 10/27/2015 7:54 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/26/2015 9:23 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>>>> Ron House wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 26/10/15 03:33, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2015-10-25 1:07 PM, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> 59378 New bugs 119454 Open bugs 1239 In-progress bugs 288 >>>>>>>>>>> Critical bugs 4623 High importance bugs 1231 Incomplete bugs >>>>>>>>>>> (can expire) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Linux just works. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As has been pointed out countless times, no one but scum like >>>>>>>>> you ever says "Linux just works". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I remember the big brouhaha when Win 2000 (IIRC) came out with >>>>>>>> 64000 open bugs, and that was just the OS! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Microsoft is estimating that 28,000 of these are likely to be >>>>>>> "real" >>>>>>> problems." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.zdnet.com/article/bugfest-win2000-has-63000-defects/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ubuntu, like other distros, counts bugs in the *thousands* of >>>>>>>> other packages it includes in its distro. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ubuntu doesn't include *thousands* of packages, liar. The default >>>>>>> install has a few dozen, if that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> You are "right", od course. Around 12 thousand dozens >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Install Ubuntu and you get a few dozen apps. Many thousands are >>>>> available, but they're not included with the distributon. >>>>> >>>>> More idiocy by dumbkopf. What's wrong with you? >>>> >>>> Actually, I think that Peter is referring to the fact that the >>>> operating system itself is a combination of packages. You're speaking >>>> of applications whereas he seems to be talking about their libraries >>>> and including them in the term "package." >>>> >>>> >>> Wrong, as usual. No surprise from you here >>> >>> What cretinous dimbulb has postulated that all available packages >>> absolutely *have* *to* come with the base distro? Who is that abjectly >>> stupid that he can't include additional repos with some mouseclicks? >> >> About 99 percent of end users which is one reason why Linux is doing so >> miserably as a desktop alternative to Windows. >> >> First the user has to know the repositories exist in the first place. > > Nope. Besides this is no worse than a Windows or Mac user needing to > know where to get 3rd party software for that platform. > Nope in the case of a Linux lover or geeks. It isn't as findable as stuff for Windows or OSX. > A suitable number of repositories are pre-installed and work just > like > the Apple store (that's a knock-off of apt-get). > Hmm... When I installed the Ubuntu full desktop on my Chromebook the only one there is Ubuntu's as far as I can tell. >> Then the user has to make sure he doesn't include something which will >> conflict with the other repositories and make a mess of things. > > Possible but not likely. > I agree. The package managers are all nearly bullet proof these days. >> That's the problem with Linux. People aren't interested in wasting time >> fucking with it. >> >> > Nope. That's just your own twisted fantasy. > 98% of the desktop/laptop market must live in a fantasy world then. > If people are so timid and frightened, they shouldn't be doing random > things with ANY OS. They aren't going to experiment with weird things > that will blow their system up. I don't disagree. Average home user shouldn't be using something as poorly supported as Linux desktop. Nor should they be delving into the innards of other OS's unless they are willing to do the work involved in learning enough to make that interesting and fun for them. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 10:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <n0qmkb$dti$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329117 |
On 2015-10-28 9:08 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Charmed Tuna wrote: > >> On 2015-10-27 10:40 PM, DFS wrote: >>> On 10/27/2015 7:54 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> DFS wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/26/2015 9:23 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>> Ron House wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26/10/15 03:33, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2015-10-25 1:07 PM, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>> 59378 New bugs >>>>>>>>> 119454 Open bugs >>>>>>>>> 1239 In-progress bugs >>>>>>>>> 288 Critical bugs >>>>>>>>> 4623 High importance bugs >>>>>>>>> 1231 Incomplete bugs (can expire) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Linux just works. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As has been pointed out countless times, no one but scum like you >>>>>>> ever says "Linux just works". >>>>>> >>>>>> I remember the big brouhaha when Win 2000 (IIRC) came out with 64000 >>>>>> open >>>>>> bugs, and that was just the OS! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Microsoft is estimating that 28,000 of these are likely to be "real" >>>>> problems." >>>>> >>>>> http://www.zdnet.com/article/bugfest-win2000-has-63000-defects/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Ubuntu, like other distros, counts bugs in >>>>>> the *thousands* of other packages it includes in its distro. >>>>> >>>>> Ubuntu doesn't include *thousands* of packages, liar. The default >>>>> install has a few dozen, if that. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You are "right", od course. Around 12 thousand dozens >>> >>> >>> Install Ubuntu and you get a few dozen apps. Many thousands are >>> available, but they're not included with the distributon. >>> >>> More idiocy by dumbkopf. What's wrong with you? >> >> Actually, I think that Peter is referring to the fact that the operating >> system itself is a combination of packages. You're speaking of >> applications whereas he seems to be talking about their libraries and >> including them in the term "package." >> > > Wrong, as usual. No surprise from you here Actually, it has since been determined that I was correct in assuming you were referring to the libraries as well. I don't expect an apology from a delusional maniac like you though. > What cretinous dimbulb has postulated that all available packages absolutely > *have* *to* come with the base distro? Who is that abjectly stupid that he > can't include additional repos with some mouseclicks? He never said such a thing and neither did I. You're lying, once again. > User needs are different, and so it is just normal to have repos with > different target audience > > At least DumbFullSnit admits that he is unable to do so extremely simple > tasks He never admitted any such thing. Are you and Snit related? -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 22:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <tj26gc-3hr.ln1@spanky.localhost.net> |
| In reply to | #328520 |
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:23:38 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Ron House wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 26/10/15 03:33, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>> On 2015-10-25 1:07 PM, DFS wrote: >>>> 59378 New bugs 119454 Open bugs 1239 In-progress bugs 288 Critical >>>> bugs 4623 High importance bugs 1231 Incomplete bugs (can expire) >>>> >>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs >>> >>> Linux just works. >> >> As has been pointed out countless times, no one but scum like you ever >> says "Linux just works". > > I remember the big brouhaha when Win 2000 (IIRC) came out with 64000 > open bugs, and that was just the OS! Ubuntu, like other distros, counts > bugs in the *thousands* of other packages it includes in its distro. > > At least they're upfront about it, unlike Microsoft. > > And Microsoft has proven that a company can successfully foist a very > broken product on the marketplace, and keep it there. Just a quick sampling: Enter key does not work either on JDK 6 or 7 -- In NetBeans Install failed: unmet dependencies -- In SciLab php5-ps segmentation fault on ps_setfont (64bit) -- In PHP ps postinst fails when names have unusual characters -- In Samba 4 Not a one of which is either specific to, or a result of, Ubuntu. As you point out, LGX, unlike Redmondware, has a tendency to be open and up front about issues, rather than keeping quiet about them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 18:39 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: More silliness from K00k DFS and his little pal |
| Message-ID | <zaCdnSOxhKwz96zLnZ2dnUU7-aWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329084 |
On 10/27/15 23:21, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:23:38 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> Ron House wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On 26/10/15 03:33, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-25 1:07 PM, DFS wrote: >>>>> 59378 New bugs 119454 Open bugs 1239 In-progress bugs 288 Critical >>>>> bugs 4623 High importance bugs 1231 Incomplete bugs (can expire) >>>>> >>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs >>>> >>>> Linux just works. >>> >>> As has been pointed out countless times, no one but scum like you ever >>> says "Linux just works". >> >> I remember the big brouhaha when Win 2000 (IIRC) came out with 64000 >> open bugs, and that was just the OS! Ubuntu, like other distros, counts >> bugs in the *thousands* of other packages it includes in its distro. >> >> At least they're upfront about it, unlike Microsoft. >> >> And Microsoft has proven that a company can successfully foist a very >> broken product on the marketplace, and keep it there. > > Just a quick sampling: > > Enter key does not work either on JDK 6 or 7 > -- In NetBeans > > Install failed: unmet dependencies > -- In SciLab > > php5-ps segmentation fault on ps_setfont (64bit) > -- In PHP ps > > postinst fails when names have unusual characters > -- In Samba 4 > > > Not a one of which is either specific to, or a result of, Ubuntu. As you > point out, LGX, unlike Redmondware, has a tendency to be open and up > front about issues, rather than keeping quiet about them. > Funny that this is just the opposite of what the regular advocates do. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 09:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0la3h$iio$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328463 |
On 10/25/2015 11:39 PM, Out House wrote: > On 26/10/15 03:33, Charmed Tuna wrote: >> On 2015-10-25 1:07 PM, DFS wrote: >>> 59378 New bugs >>> 119454 Open bugs >>> 1239 In-progress bugs >>> 288 Critical bugs >>> 4623 High importance bugs >>> 1231 Incomplete bugs (can expire) >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs >> >> Linux just works. >> > > As has been pointed out countless times, no one but scum like you ever > says "Linux just works". The creator of "The Principle Of Goodness" in action... good one, Out House! Lots of other scum promise that 'Linux just works'. They're called 'Linux advocates' and they blab it a LOT. In fact, there's a whole website devoted to spreading the bullshit lie: www.linuxjustworks.com Also: "Linux just works." About 7,560 results -- "About the Authors Ron House and Gitie House have been conducting a quest for truth, or reality (call it what you will), for some thirty years... Unfortunately that message was a threat to the power of those leaders, and they directed every member of their religion to shun the discoverers of the Principle of Goodness. They sent representatives even to countries which Ron and Gitie had never visited to threaten to wreck the families of people who befriended them. Sadly, their former religious community is required, on pain of having their own families and relationships destroyed, to maintain this persecution even today." http://principleofgoodness.net/aboutta Out House, having a bad acid trip
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 09:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0lb0u$kpg$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328463 |
On 2015-10-25 11:39 PM, Ron House wrote: > On 26/10/15 03:33, Charmed Tuna wrote: >> On 2015-10-25 1:07 PM, DFS wrote: >>> 59378 New bugs >>> 119454 Open bugs >>> 1239 In-progress bugs >>> 288 Critical bugs >>> 4623 High importance bugs >>> 1231 Incomplete bugs (can expire) >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs >> >> Linux just works. >> > > As has been pointed out countless times, no one but scum like you ever > says "Linux just works". Actually, the greatest scum this newsgroup has ever seen, John GodHesDumb says it all the time. Not only that but your president, Joseph Michael, takes great care in reminding us how it "just works" with every one of his posts. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 18:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0lq65$n3b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328463 |
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:39:12 +1000, Ron House wrote: > On 26/10/15 03:33, Charmed Tuna wrote: >> On 2015-10-25 1:07 PM, DFS wrote: >>> 59378 New bugs 119454 Open bugs 1239 In-progress bugs 288 Critical >>> bugs 4623 High importance bugs 1231 Incomplete bugs (can expire) >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs >> >> Linux just works. >> >> > As has been pointed out countless times, no one but scum like you ever > says "Linux just works". Linux works a WHOLE LOT BETTER than the Malware Magnet Hobbyware OS from Redmond. Much, much faster to install, much easier to maintain and a whole lot more secure and solid. If you want it to "just work" use one of the established, non-bleeding edge distributions -- like Linux Mint on Mate. That's what I do -- and, for me, it does "just work." But some folks want the newest features and they realize that will require more work. Kind of like Malware Magnet Hobbyware OS and the way M$ uses their early adapters as beta testers -- though bleeding edge Linux distributions are more stable than M$ Crapware. -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web