Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #326676 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-15 12:13 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-10-15 19:14 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 266 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
I'm back! Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-15 12:13 +0000
Re: I'm back! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-15 13:23 +0100
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-15 14:39 +0200
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-15 07:45 -0500
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-15 08:55 -0400
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-15 18:41 +0200
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-15 13:16 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-15 10:18 -0700
Re: I'm back! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-15 20:21 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-15 17:36 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-15 21:10 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-15 18:22 -0700
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-16 09:10 +0200
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-16 06:43 -0500
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-16 13:44 +0200
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 08:35 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 09:32 -0400
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-16 15:41 +0200
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 09:48 -0400
Re: I'm back! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-16 15:59 +0200
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 10:18 -0400
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-16 09:38 -0500
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 10:44 -0400
Re: I'm back! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 00:47 +0000
Re: I'm back! Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-16 20:51 -0400
Re: I'm back! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-17 08:49 -0400
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-19 09:05 -0500
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 14:14 +0000
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-19 08:23 -0700
Re: I'm back! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-19 12:30 -0500
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-19 13:27 -0500
Re: I'm back! Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-10-19 13:47 -0500
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-19 18:47 -0700
Re: I'm back! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-20 04:20 +0200
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 02:36 +0000
Re: I'm back! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-20 04:46 +0200
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-20 03:45 -0700
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-20 07:35 -0500
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-20 07:11 -0700
Re: I'm back! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 16:33 +0000
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 16:37 +0000
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-20 12:44 -0400
Re: I'm back! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-20 15:28 -0600
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-20 12:15 -0500
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-20 13:17 -0400
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 17:30 +0000
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 10:41 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-20 14:51 -0400
Re: I'm back! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-20 15:29 -0600
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 10:38 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-20 17:04 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-20 15:55 -0700
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 16:03 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-20 19:33 -0400
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 16:41 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 08:30 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 09:52 -0700
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-20 16:57 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 08:35 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 09:51 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 13:18 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 10:39 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 14:41 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 11:52 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 17:36 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 15:34 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 18:48 -0400
Re: I'm back! Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 18:51 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 15:58 -0700
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 10:06 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 13:34 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 10:48 -0700
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 11:01 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 17:02 -0400
Re: I'm back! Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 17:18 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 14:18 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 17:47 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 15:29 -0700
Re: I'm back! Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 18:36 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm back! Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 18:51 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 16:06 -0700
Re: I'm back! Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 19:32 -0400
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 18:55 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 16:05 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 19:54 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-22 00:02 +0000
Re: I'm back! Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 20:04 -0400
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 15:07 -0700
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 10:58 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 14:52 -0400
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 10:37 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 14:41 -0400
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 17:29 +0000
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-20 19:57 -0500
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 01:10 +0000
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-20 18:24 -0700
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 01:29 +0000
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-20 18:23 -0700
Re: I'm back! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-20 17:14 -0500
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 22:31 +0000
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-20 19:25 -0500
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-21 07:45 -0500
Re: I'm back! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-21 11:23 -0400
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-21 18:38 -0500
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-21 17:39 -0700
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-19 18:47 -0700
Re: I'm back! Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-10-19 13:45 -0500
Re: I'm back! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-20 04:22 +0200
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 02:38 +0000
Re: I'm back! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-20 04:49 +0200
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-20 08:34 -0500
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 13:44 +0000
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-20 06:58 -0700
Re: I'm back! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-20 23:00 +0100
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 22:10 +0000
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-20 18:30 -0400
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-21 00:44 +0200
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 23:11 +0000
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 23:12 +0000
Re: I'm back! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-21 00:10 +0100
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 08:28 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 10:10 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 13:39 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 10:42 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 14:44 -0400
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-20 19:18 -0500
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 00:20 +0000
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-21 07:33 -0500
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 12:48 +0000
Talking to yourself, Turdv? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-21 11:46 -0600
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-21 18:40 -0500
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-22 07:17 -0500
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 12:27 +0000
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-22 10:21 -0400
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 07:45 -0700
Re: I'm back! Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 08:13 -0700
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-22 21:44 -0500
Re: I'm back! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-21 11:45 -0600
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 17:54 +0000
Re: I'm back! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-21 16:37 -0600
Re: I'm back! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-20 17:17 -0500
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm back! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-21 00:08 +0100
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 08:22 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 07:35 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 10:42 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 08:19 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-16 09:25 -0500
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 10:29 -0400
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-16 15:01 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 18:52 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 08:20 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 12:22 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 10:12 -0700
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 07:36 -0700
Re: I'm back! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 00:42 +0000
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 18:46 -0700
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-17 18:53 +0200
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-17 12:55 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-17 10:20 -0700
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-17 21:09 +0200
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-17 13:26 -0700
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 16:16 -0500
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 16:37 -0500
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-18 23:41 +0200
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 14:47 -0700
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-19 00:34 +0200
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 17:54 -0500
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 16:11 -0700
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 17:45 -0500
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 15:51 -0700
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 14:41 -0700
Ronb: "zero tolerance" for his imaginary friends. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 21:30 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-17 10:45 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-17 09:43 -0700
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-17 18:52 +0200
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-17 12:54 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-17 10:21 -0700
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-17 21:07 +0200
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-17 13:25 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-18 10:01 -0400
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-18 17:46 +0200
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-18 17:39 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 14:42 -0700
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 10:30 -0700
Snit Michael Glasser lying again (news at 11) Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-18 20:39 +0200
Re: Snit Michael Glasser lying again (news at 11) Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-18 15:03 -0400
Re: Snit Michael Glasser lying again (news at 11) Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 16:07 -0500
Re: Snit Michael Glasser lying again (news at 11) "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-18 17:40 -0400
Re: I'm back! "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-10-18 19:55 +0000
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 13:32 -0700
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-18 22:39 +0200
Re: I'm back! "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-10-19 00:23 +0000
Re: I'm back! cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-19 07:02 -0700
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-19 10:49 -0700
Re: I'm back! Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-10-19 12:54 -0500
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-19 11:01 -0700
Re: I'm back! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-19 20:10 +0200
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-19 11:23 -0700
Re: I'm back! Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-10-19 13:50 -0500
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-19 12:36 -0700
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-17 10:20 -0700
Pot kettle black. Go look in a mirror. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-17 12:23 -0600
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 08:36 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 12:24 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 10:12 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-16 09:31 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 14:21 -0700
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-16 08:37 -0700
Re: I'm back! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-17 11:00 -0400
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-17 11:18 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-15 10:00 -0700
Re: I'm back! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-15 18:01 +0000
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-15 11:15 -0700
Re: I'm back! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-15 17:58 +0000
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-15 11:14 -0700
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-15 19:55 -0500
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-15 18:08 -0700
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-15 19:57 -0500
Re: I'm back! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-15 21:19 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-15 18:33 -0700
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-15 06:02 -0700
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-15 09:10 -0400
Re: I'm back! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-15 10:16 -0400
Re: I'm back! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-15 15:21 +0000
Re: I'm back! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-15 16:29 -0600
Re: I'm back! Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-16 00:26 +0000
Re: I'm back! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 01:02 +0000
Re: I'm back! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-15 21:18 -0400
Re: I'm back! Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-16 12:06 +0000
Re: I'm back! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 13:29 +0000
Re: I'm back! Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-17 00:56 +0000
Re: I'm back! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 13:45 +0000
Re: I'm back! Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-17 14:14 +0000
Re: I'm back! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-17 13:24 -0400
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-19 07:30 -0500
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-19 08:42 -0400
Re: I'm back! Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-19 22:25 +0000
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-20 06:49 -0500
Re: I'm back! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-15 21:16 -0400
Re: I'm back! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-16 14:30 -0400
Re: I'm back! cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-16 11:52 -0700
Re: I'm back! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-16 16:20 -0400
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-16 14:57 -0700
Re: I'm back! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-17 08:29 -0400
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-17 13:41 -0700
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-17 18:29 -0700
Re: I'm back! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-16 23:39 +0000
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-17 10:43 -0400
Re: I'm back! Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-17 00:41 +0000
Re: I'm back! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-17 06:29 -0400
Re: I'm back! Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-17 12:42 +0000
Re: I'm back! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-17 10:02 -0500
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-17 09:22 -0700
Re: I'm back! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-17 13:24 -0400
Re: I'm back! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-17 10:27 -0700
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-19 07:44 -0500
Re: I'm back! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-19 08:48 -0400
Re: I'm back! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-19 12:20 -0400
Re: I'm back! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-19 10:26 -0700
Re: I'm back! Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-19 22:21 +0000
Re: I'm back! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-20 06:52 -0500
Re: I'm back! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-15 14:07 -0400
Re: I'm back! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-15 19:14 +0000
Page 7 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 14 Next page →
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 00:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <g8uifc-5oj.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #327340 |
It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: > A.M wrote: > >> On 2015-10-20 6:00 PM, William Poaster wrote: >>> It was reported that chrisv posted: >>> >>>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>>> >>>>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> JEDIDIAH said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ...except most people don't need to do that. They can just use one >>>>>>> of the more prominent options because of the mass market effect. >>>>>>> Most people don't need the "special use case". They can just use >>>>>>> one of the more common options. >>>>>> >>>>>> Given the very tiny marketshare of linux on the desktop, there is no >>>>>> 'mass market effect'. >>>> >>>> Yes there is, Lying Lloyd. "One percent of the planet" is still a lot >>>> of people using a product. There are "prominent options because of >>>> the mass market effect" in even far-smaller markets. >>> >>> If Linux desktop is a "very tiny marketshare", then so is Apple/Mac. >> >> It's not a conditional sentence, Apple has a small marketshare on the >> desktop internationally. However, in the United States it's in the >> double digits. >> > > Worldwide it is only slightly higher than linux desktop. > And then there are *no* OSX servers worth mentioning, *no* OSX embedded > systems. And no supercomputers. Not one still in the ranks > > Which in reality means: Linux ha sa *much* higher marketshare than apples > OSX has. You dimbulbs can only pretend it is meaningless because you try to > keep the discussion to desktop only > > Too bad that you idiots don't decide what the discussion is about, isn't it? Yeah, well trust Slimball/AM to come out with some horseshit. -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.2.2-1.gb3ecf72-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Sep 29 18:51:15 UTC 2015 (b3ecf72) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 08:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0809i$lgc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327404 |
On 2015-10-20 7:10 PM, William Poaster wrote: > It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: > >> A.M wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-20 6:00 PM, William Poaster wrote: >>>> It was reported that chrisv posted: >>>> >>>>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> JEDIDIAH said: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ...except most people don't need to do that. They can just use one >>>>>>>> of the more prominent options because of the mass market effect. >>>>>>>> Most people don't need the "special use case". They can just use >>>>>>>> one of the more common options. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Given the very tiny marketshare of linux on the desktop, there is no >>>>>>> 'mass market effect'. >>>>> >>>>> Yes there is, Lying Lloyd. "One percent of the planet" is still a lot >>>>> of people using a product. There are "prominent options because of >>>>> the mass market effect" in even far-smaller markets. >>>> >>>> If Linux desktop is a "very tiny marketshare", then so is Apple/Mac. >>> >>> It's not a conditional sentence, Apple has a small marketshare on the >>> desktop internationally. However, in the United States it's in the >>> double digits. >>> >> >> Worldwide it is only slightly higher than linux desktop. >> And then there are *no* OSX servers worth mentioning, *no* OSX embedded >> systems. And no supercomputers. Not one still in the ranks >> >> Which in reality means: Linux ha sa *much* higher marketshare than apples >> OSX has. You dimbulbs can only pretend it is meaningless because you try to >> keep the discussion to desktop only >> >> Too bad that you idiots don't decide what the discussion is about, isn't it? > > Yeah, well trust Slimball/AM to come out with some horseshit. How is it horseshit? Does evidence even matter to you or are you just programmed to deny that anything I say is the truth? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Desktop_and_laptop_computers> Internationally, OS X is up to 7.72% whereas Linux is at 1.74%. To which they specify that "Conversely OS X in North America claims 17% whereas in Asia it is only 3%" In other words, I have proven myself correct and nullified yet another of your needless and pointless insults. At this point, you should apologize to me but we all know that you won't because you don't have any kind of honour. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 10:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D24D150C.60E39%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #327425 |
On 10/21/15, 5:28 AM, in article n0809i$lgc$1@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> Worldwide it is only slightly higher than linux desktop. >>> And then there are *no* OSX servers worth mentioning, *no* OSX embedded >>> systems. And no supercomputers. Not one still in the ranks >>> >>> Which in reality means: Linux ha sa *much* higher marketshare than apples >>> OSX has. You dimbulbs can only pretend it is meaningless because you try to >>> keep the discussion to desktop only >>> >>> Too bad that you idiots don't decide what the discussion is about, isn't it? >> >> Yeah, well trust Slimball/AM to come out with some horseshit. > > How is it horseshit? Does evidence even matter to you or are you just > programmed to deny that anything I say is the truth? > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Desktop_and_la > ptop_computers> > > Internationally, OS X is up to 7.72% whereas Linux is at 1.74%. And the sad thing is user share means VERY different things for the two. OS X cannot be used at no cost, as Linux can, and is, in fact, a high end expensive product. Such products are expected to have small numbers of users. Linux is cheap. It can be had for free... and runs on almost any hardware. IF it was a product that competed well people would be flocking to it. > To which they specify that "Conversely OS X in North America claims 17% > whereas in Asia it is only 3%" > > In other words, I have proven myself correct and nullified yet another > of your needless and pointless insults. At this point, you should > apologize to me but we all know that you won't because you don't have > any kind of honour. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 13:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n08ih1$v96$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327510 |
On 2015-10-21 1:10 PM, Snit wrote: > On 10/21/15, 5:28 AM, in article n0809i$lgc$1@dont-email.me, "A.M" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >>>> Worldwide it is only slightly higher than linux desktop. >>>> And then there are *no* OSX servers worth mentioning, *no* OSX embedded >>>> systems. And no supercomputers. Not one still in the ranks >>>> >>>> Which in reality means: Linux ha sa *much* higher marketshare than apples >>>> OSX has. You dimbulbs can only pretend it is meaningless because you try to >>>> keep the discussion to desktop only >>>> >>>> Too bad that you idiots don't decide what the discussion is about, isn't it? >>> >>> Yeah, well trust Slimball/AM to come out with some horseshit. >> >> How is it horseshit? Does evidence even matter to you or are you just >> programmed to deny that anything I say is the truth? >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Desktop_and_la >> ptop_computers> >> >> Internationally, OS X is up to 7.72% whereas Linux is at 1.74%. > > And the sad thing is user share means VERY different things for the two. OS > X cannot be used at no cost, as Linux can, and is, in fact, a high end > expensive product. Such products are expected to have small numbers of > users. > > Linux is cheap. It can be had for free... and runs on almost any hardware. > IF it was a product that competed well people would be flocking to it. I would love to support it. After all, any donation I make to Linux gets me credit and I know that I am helping the developer directly and in turn getting direct results. I am also a huge fan of Linux and believe that it has its role to play in ensuring that the world gets equal access to technology and that it isn't reserved for the most fortunate. However, every interest I have in the product always ends up biting me in the ass in the form of an unstable working environment or applications which only claim to do certain things but produce mediocre results. I COULD rely on it regardless, but I would have to disregard way too much to do so. Besides, I don't HAVE to do so as I am still fairly well compensated for the work that I do and can afford a better computer with a better operating system. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 10:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D24D1C7E.60E4D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #327522 |
On 10/21/15, 10:39 AM, in article n08ih1$v96$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> How is it horseshit? Does evidence even matter to you or are you just >>> programmed to deny that anything I say is the truth? >>> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Desktop_and_ >>> la >>> ptop_computers> >>> >>> Internationally, OS X is up to 7.72% whereas Linux is at 1.74%. >> >> And the sad thing is user share means VERY different things for the two. OS >> X cannot be used at no cost, as Linux can, and is, in fact, a high end >> expensive product. Such products are expected to have small numbers of >> users. >> >> Linux is cheap. It can be had for free... and runs on almost any hardware. >> IF it was a product that competed well people would be flocking to it. > > I would love to support it. After all, any donation I make to Linux gets > me credit and I know that I am helping the developer directly and in > turn getting direct results. I am also a huge fan of Linux and believe > that it has its role to play in ensuring that the world gets equal > access to technology and that it isn't reserved for the most fortunate. > However, every interest I have in the product always ends up biting me > in the ass in the form of an unstable working environment or > applications which only claim to do certain things but produce mediocre > results. I COULD rely on it regardless, but I would have to disregard > way too much to do so. Besides, I don't HAVE to do so as I am still > fairly well compensated for the work that I do and can afford a better > computer with a better operating system. I would love to have the open source ecosystem mature enough so that I could use it as well and that the tasks I do now could be done as well and as efficiently on it as on the competition. It has a LONG way to go. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 14:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n08ma2$gcg$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327523 |
On 2015-10-21 1:42 PM, Snit wrote: > On 10/21/15, 10:39 AM, in article n08ih1$v96$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >>>> How is it horseshit? Does evidence even matter to you or are you just >>>> programmed to deny that anything I say is the truth? >>>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Desktop_and_ >>>> la >>>> ptop_computers> >>>> >>>> Internationally, OS X is up to 7.72% whereas Linux is at 1.74%. >>> >>> And the sad thing is user share means VERY different things for the two. OS >>> X cannot be used at no cost, as Linux can, and is, in fact, a high end >>> expensive product. Such products are expected to have small numbers of >>> users. >>> >>> Linux is cheap. It can be had for free... and runs on almost any hardware. >>> IF it was a product that competed well people would be flocking to it. >> >> I would love to support it. After all, any donation I make to Linux gets >> me credit and I know that I am helping the developer directly and in >> turn getting direct results. I am also a huge fan of Linux and believe >> that it has its role to play in ensuring that the world gets equal >> access to technology and that it isn't reserved for the most fortunate. >> However, every interest I have in the product always ends up biting me >> in the ass in the form of an unstable working environment or >> applications which only claim to do certain things but produce mediocre >> results. I COULD rely on it regardless, but I would have to disregard >> way too much to do so. Besides, I don't HAVE to do so as I am still >> fairly well compensated for the work that I do and can afford a better >> computer with a better operating system. > > I would love to have the open source ecosystem mature enough so that I could > use it as well and that the tasks I do now could be done as well and as > efficiently on it as on the competition. It has a LONG way to go. That's putting it lightly. Linux, at the moment, has as much hope of becoming my main desktop as Melissa McCarthy has of becoming a bikini model. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-20 19:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n06ljp$2t6$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #327323 |
On 10/20/2015 5:00 PM, William Poaster wrote: > It was reported that chrisv posted: > >> Melzzzzz wrote: >> >>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>> >>>> JEDIDIAH said: >>>>> >>>>> ...except most people don't need to do that. They can just use one >>>>> of the more prominent options because of the mass market effect. >>>>> Most people don't need the "special use case". They can just use >>>>> one of the more common options. >>>> >>>> Given the very tiny marketshare of linux on the desktop, there is no >>>> 'mass market effect'. >> >> Yes there is, Lying Lloyd. "One percent of the planet" is still a lot >> of people using a product. There are "prominent options because of >> the mass market effect" in even far-smaller markets. > > If Linux desktop is a "very tiny marketshare", then so is Apple/Mac. > >>>> But I understand where you are coming from. Yes, a consumer could >>>> use one of the 3 or 4 main distros and be good to go. >> >> So, you just had to be snotty. > > Naturally, he's an iCultist. KF him like I did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 00:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d8o420Fl43bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #327371 |
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:18:05 -0500, Nobody wrote: > On 10/20/2015 5:00 PM, William Poaster wrote: >> It was reported that chrisv posted: >> >>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>>> >>>>> JEDIDIAH said: >>>>>> >>>>>> ...except most people don't need to do that. They can just use one >>>>>> of the more prominent options because of the mass market effect. >>>>>> Most people don't need the "special use case". They can just use >>>>>> one of the more common options. >>>>> >>>>> Given the very tiny marketshare of linux on the desktop, there is no >>>>> 'mass market effect'. >>> >>> Yes there is, Lying Lloyd. "One percent of the planet" is still a lot >>> of people using a product. There are "prominent options because of >>> the mass market effect" in even far-smaller markets. >> >> If Linux desktop is a "very tiny marketshare", then so is Apple/Mac. >> >>>>> But I understand where you are coming from. Yes, a consumer could >>>>> use one of the 3 or 4 main distros and be good to go. >>> >>> So, you just had to be snotty. >> >> Naturally, he's an iCultist. > > KF him like I did. FOAD no-brains. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 07:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8s0f2bl22argbblq6ehm0nrk0g504mbne7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #327371 |
Nobody wrote: > William Poaster wrote: >> >> chrisv posted: >>> >>>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>>> >>>>> But I understand where you are coming from. Yes, a consumer could >>>>> use one of the 3 or 4 main distros and be good to go. >>> >>> So, you just had to be snotty. >> >> Naturally, he's an iCultist. > > KF him like I did. All three of us have. But that doesn't bother "Lloyd". You see, in Lying Lloyd's fantasy world, *we* are the liars, and some of those lies are about our usage of kill-filters and declarations of "snipped, unread". Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with *zero* evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes that he's a good person. -- "So when Google bribes and pays-off Sony to ship it's products you hypocrites are suddenly okay with that?" - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", claiming that there's something wrong with Google paying Sony to pre-install the Chrome browser, and that advocates were "hypocrites" for not denouncing it. After all, we complained about *years* of IE being the *only* browser pre-installed on pretty-much *every* Windows PC...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 12:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d8pfsaFeceU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #327428 |
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:33:44 -0500, chrisv wrote: > Nobody wrote: > >> William Poaster wrote: >>> >>> chrisv posted: >>>> >>>>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> But I understand where you are coming from. Yes, a consumer could >>>>>> use one of the 3 or 4 main distros and be good to go. >>>> >>>> So, you just had to be snotty. >>> >>> Naturally, he's an iCultist. >> >> KF him like I did. > > All three of us have. But that doesn't bother "Lloyd". > > You see, in Lying Lloyd's fantasy world, *we* are the liars, and some of > those lies are about our usage of kill-filters and declarations of > "snipped, unread". > > Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with *zero* > evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes that > he's a good person. Other than bitching about trolls, when was the last time you made a post containing something else? Or quoting one of the trolls in your killfile? -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 11:46 -0600 |
| Subject | Talking to yourself, Turdv? |
| Message-ID | <sbCdnUC9PaHoUrrLnZ2dnUU7-bOdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #327428 |
On 10/21/15 06:33, chrisv wrote: > Nobody wrote: > >> William Poaster wrote: >>> >>> chrisv posted: >>>> >>>>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> But I understand where you are coming from. Yes, a consumer could >>>>>> use one of the 3 or 4 main distros and be good to go. >>>> >>>> So, you just had to be snotty. >>> >>> Naturally, he's an iCultist. >> >> KF him like I did. > > All three of us have. But that doesn't bother "Lloyd". > > You see, in Lying Lloyd's fantasy world, *we* are the liars, and some > of those lies are about our usage of kill-filters and declarations of > "snipped, unread". > > Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with > *zero* evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes > that he's a good person. > -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 18:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n097p6$hu5$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #327428 |
On 10/21/2015 7:33 AM, chrisv wrote: > Nobody wrote: > >> William Poaster wrote: >>> >>> chrisv posted: >>>> >>>>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> But I understand where you are coming from. Yes, a consumer could >>>>>> use one of the 3 or 4 main distros and be good to go. >>>> >>>> So, you just had to be snotty. >>> >>> Naturally, he's an iCultist. >> >> KF him like I did. > > All three of us have. But that doesn't bother "Lloyd". > > You see, in Lying Lloyd's fantasy world, *we* are the liars, and some > of those lies are about our usage of kill-filters and declarations of > "snipped, unread". > > Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with > *zero* evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes > that he's a good person. Remember the answer he gave when DooFuS asked him what kind of hypocrite he is?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 07:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ihkh2bh9nhqtianahn4dmuuphn9s5j64eg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #327646 |
Nobody wrote: >On 10/21/2015 7:33 AM, chrisv wrote: >> >> Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with >> *zero* evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes >> that he's a good person. > >Remember the answer he gave when DooFuS asked him what kind of hypocrite >he is? I don't recall seeing that, no. Knowing "Lloyd", it was probably a lie, anyway. With the exception of one day last Spring, he's been plonked for a year, now. I tried giving him a couple 6-month trial plonkings, to see if he would grow the fsck up, but now there is no expiration date on his filter. Poor "Lloyd". -- "Your 'explanations' are just excuses. Both Android and ChromeOS have found markets. Linux on the desktop hasn't." - Lying Lloyd Parsons
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 12:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d8s31rFjvk6U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #327702 |
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:17:45 -0500, chrisv wrote: > Nobody wrote: > >>On 10/21/2015 7:33 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> >>> Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with >>> *zero* evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes >>> that he's a good person. >> >>Remember the answer he gave when DooFuS asked him what kind of hypocrite >>he is? > > I don't recall seeing that, no. Knowing "Lloyd", it was probably a lie, > anyway. > > With the exception of one day last Spring, he's been plonked for a year, > now. I tried giving him a couple 6-month trial plonkings, to see if he > would grow the fsck up, but now there is no expiration date on his > filter. Poor "Lloyd". More bullshit from you. You've been reading and quoting me for quite a long time including during my supposed residence in your 'kill file'. As to growing up, well during that supposed 'year of plonking', I've discussed Linux in both positive and negative ways, talked about Chromebooks and Linux a few times and other technical discussions here and there. During that same period, you have posted nothing but 'troll this or troll that', with no few curse words thrown in as well as various forms of the word 'lie'. And of course, you and wRonG's incessant need to discuss trolls that you claim to have killfiled. Oh and yeah, let's not forget your posts demonstrating clearly why your employer wants you on usenet since you have no business sense whatsoever. All or nearly all of your posts coming from the Windows box you actually use vice the fictional Linux box you don't have or know anything about. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 10:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0ar8f$551$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327702 |
On 2015-10-22 8:17 AM, chrisv wrote: > Nobody wrote: > >> On 10/21/2015 7:33 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> >>> Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with >>> *zero* evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes >>> that he's a good person. >> >> Remember the answer he gave when DooFuS asked him what kind of hypocrite >> he is? > > I don't recall seeing that, no. Knowing "Lloyd", it was probably a > lie, anyway. > > With the exception of one day last Spring, he's been plonked for a > year, now. I tried giving him a couple 6-month trial plonkings, to > see if he would grow the fsck up, but now there is no expiration date > on his filter. Poor "Lloyd". What exactly do you expect when you say "grow the fsck up?" As far as I can tell, he's a very reasonable person to deal with and doesn't attack people needlessly the way that you do. If anything, you are the one who needs maturing. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 07:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dea36444-8191-4cb8-8284-0e6f285d4e8e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #327730 |
On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 8:21:05 AM UTC-6, A.M wrote: > On 2015-10-22 8:17 AM, chrisv wrote: > > Nobody wrote: > > > >> On 10/21/2015 7:33 AM, chrisv wrote: > >>> > >>> Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with > >>> *zero* evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes > >>> that he's a good person. > >> > >> Remember the answer he gave when DooFuS asked him what kind of hypocrite > >> he is? > > > > I don't recall seeing that, no. Knowing "Lloyd", it was probably a > > lie, anyway. > > > > With the exception of one day last Spring, he's been plonked for a > > year, now. I tried giving him a couple 6-month trial plonkings, to > > see if he would grow the fsck up, but now there is no expiration date > > on his filter. Poor "Lloyd". > > What exactly do you expect when you say "grow the fsck up?" As far as I > can tell, he's a very reasonable person to deal with and doesn't attack > people needlessly the way that you do. If anything, you are the one who > needs maturing. A cowardly, dishonest, racist piece of delusional sh*t is telling someone else they need maturing. What's wrong with this picture <eyeroll>?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 08:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b423e289-63a2-4823-825f-c3bbf5176205@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #327746 |
On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 2:46:01 PM UTC, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 8:21:05 AM UTC-6, A.M wrote: > > On 2015-10-22 8:17 AM, chrisv wrote: > > > Nobody wrote: > > > > > >> On 10/21/2015 7:33 AM, chrisv wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with > > >>> *zero* evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes > > >>> that he's a good person. > > >> > > >> Remember the answer he gave when DooFuS asked him what kind of hypocrite > > >> he is? > > > > > > I don't recall seeing that, no. Knowing "Lloyd", it was probably a > > > lie, anyway. > > > > > > With the exception of one day last Spring, he's been plonked for a > > > year, now. I tried giving him a couple 6-month trial plonkings, to > > > see if he would grow the fsck up, but now there is no expiration date > > > on his filter. Poor "Lloyd". > > > > What exactly do you expect when you say "grow the fsck up?" As far as I > > can tell, he's a very reasonable person to deal with and doesn't attack > > people needlessly the way that you do. If anything, you are the one who > > needs maturing. > > A cowardly, dishonest, racist piece of delusional sh*t is telling someone else they need maturing. What's wrong with this picture <eyeroll>? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Gee, no on saw more forgeries coming. LOL! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.28 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWJpfjAAoJEC03b6bOr/+drC0P/RZBxcLK8eFZ7QUKjlqJRqfj 66udasAYnovhi+C1bpBxXZIm8Xxg2+JDdVoMfw/d+5R8+KpEXpxK+4y9GB8NuBBz 98+LuNNIus0cXJ6goCyKZj5FUajHYIhgoEAb+O8F0pYMcqv08R39IddgVEQCasDZ 9QPXlQco0QOSD49BArlDa7qgwi17Rs2zkYnw27jEIVEuYlfhqj2T7Mcirwby4JD3 +1Geq5kCdeCtMG+z6gAdth0akrSMlYLAnixbYolEFm6wtg7DW2BrwVo7NTY8Zuy1 UjRrn8JAoHrCec82HulrBBEXC/dhti2SIszDnt1GnZSTB33p1plQgklUmmqN8Qvu To/TAz07YWAeUHcYSyHzmJuVbL0r9emcQD/AfB8CxAhh+p5F5kc2hfwAOmJ4cGpV +kIqUp7N1UXqSOXnFyxYz4HJv9/c0UPNXSY2QDPmaWd7AFrB80BcOw2yVS30jQwo QhBtvoj2t/FJi/G7KnIpGYl3ZFy7QxtNL6PnPW5y46EjzDbNEnMbETTxAzI24QGw x5xgyhdiyRnpCvyHFd21d09bYOrBHH6qe3NMVTRBPjh1MUaw1E8WhQo916Zvk4jz pD23EIt9uk79a2aD+EbC/vZHLPGTqlbI1bmYV5KlzJusIO2i939Cs/AhYcdM8mEQ WqdC0S1YIC7GfYk7riFe =F3OP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 21:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n0c6u6$guc$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #327702 |
On 10/22/2015 7:17 AM, chrisv wrote: > Nobody wrote: > >> On 10/21/2015 7:33 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> >>> Of course, it takes a real prick to accuse people of lying, with >>> *zero* evidence. But "Lloyd" has no problem with that. He fantasizes >>> that he's a good person. >> >> Remember the answer he gave when DooFuS asked him what kind of hypocrite >> he is? > > I don't recall seeing that, no. Knowing "Lloyd", it was probably a > lie, anyway. His reply was "the best kind" with a smiley at the end. > With the exception of one day last Spring, he's been plonked for a > year, now. I tried giving him a couple 6-month trial plonkings, to > see if he would grow the fsck up, but now there is no expiration date > on his filter. Poor "Lloyd". You made the right decision.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 11:45 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sbCdnUG9PaHEUrrLnZ2dnUU7-bOdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #327371 |
On 10/20/15 18:18, Nobody wrote: > On 10/20/2015 5:00 PM, William Poaster wrote: >> It was reported that chrisv posted: >> >>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>>> >>>>> JEDIDIAH said: >>>>>> >>>>>> ...except most people don't need to do that. They can just use one >>>>>> of the more prominent options because of the mass market effect. >>>>>> Most people don't need the "special use case". They can just use >>>>>> one of the more common options. >>>>> >>>>> Given the very tiny marketshare of linux on the desktop, there is no >>>>> 'mass market effect'. >>> >>> Yes there is, Lying Lloyd. "One percent of the planet" is still a lot >>> of people using a product. There are "prominent options because of >>> the mass market effect" in even far-smaller markets. >> >> If Linux desktop is a "very tiny marketshare", then so is Apple/Mac. >> >>>>> But I understand where you are coming from. Yes, a consumer could >>>>> use one of the 3 or 4 main distros and be good to go. >>> >>> So, you just had to be snotty. >> >> Naturally, he's an iCultist. > > KF him like I did. > Translation: You don't have any facts to back up your biased claims, with no come backs because you are too stupid. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 17:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d8q1rgF50j0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #327524 |
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:45:57 -0600, GreyCloud wrote: > On 10/20/15 18:18, Nobody wrote: >> On 10/20/2015 5:00 PM, William Poaster wrote: >>> It was reported that chrisv posted: >>> >>>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>>> >>>>> Lying Lloyd wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> JEDIDIAH said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ...except most people don't need to do that. They can just use one >>>>>>> of the more prominent options because of the mass market effect. >>>>>>> Most people don't need the "special use case". They can just use >>>>>>> one of the more common options. >>>>>> >>>>>> Given the very tiny marketshare of linux on the desktop, there is >>>>>> no 'mass market effect'. >>>> >>>> Yes there is, Lying Lloyd. "One percent of the planet" is still a lot >>>> of people using a product. There are "prominent options because of >>>> the mass market effect" in even far-smaller markets. >>> >>> If Linux desktop is a "very tiny marketshare", then so is Apple/Mac. >>> >>>>>> But I understand where you are coming from. Yes, a consumer could >>>>>> use one of the 3 or 4 main distros and be good to go. >>>> >>>> So, you just had to be snotty. >>> >>> Naturally, he's an iCultist. >> >> KF him like I did. >> > Translation: You don't have any facts to back up your biased claims, > with no come backs because you are too stupid. Yep, they couldn't argue effectively against points I made so they decidedd to wimp out. Seems that since then all they talk about is the trolls they claim to have killfiled yet can always seem to quote. Odd, huh? :) -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web