Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #320159 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-12 00:27 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-09-15 15:22 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 165 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Why Linux is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 00:27 +0000
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-11 21:36 -0400
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 01:42 +0000
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:07 +0200
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 09:29 -0400
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:09 -0500
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-12 03:58 +0200
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-11 22:22 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 21:01 -0700
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-12 00:16 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 07:01 -0500
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 10:00 -0700
PLOOPP!!! SPLASH!!! AAAAHHHHHHH!!!! FLUSH!!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:48 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 07:06 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-12 08:36 -0300
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:57 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:56 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-12 13:42 +0100
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 14:39 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 11:23 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:51 +0000
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:55 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:59 +0100
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 16:56 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 22:26 +0000
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:05 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:04 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 07:06 -0500
Find one for sale in the stores, Turdv. Linux left the shelf years ago. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:49 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:03 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 06:09 +0100
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:50 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 05:39 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 22:14 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:05 +0200
Today's topic is: Why is Edward Milano such a Pultz? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 04:30 -0700
Re: Today's topic is: Why is Edward Milano such a Pultz? "Dr. John Grubor" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:21 +0000
Re: Why this troll is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-12 13:39 +0100
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 14:00 -0600
Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 21:04 +0100
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:05 -0600
Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:19 +0100
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:50 -0600
Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:18 -0500
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 13:08 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 06:55 -0500
Typical Turdv response. A total LUSER! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:49 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:08 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-15 21:48 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:20 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-16 17:04 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-16 23:03 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 23:24 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-16 18:33 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 17:23 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 03:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-17 08:39 -0300
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:33 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 06:02 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-18 08:06 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-18 08:54 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 15:24 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-18 12:00 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-18 12:52 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-20 13:03 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-20 19:17 +0200
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-20 14:10 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-20 21:06 +0200
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-21 07:25 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-21 09:30 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 08:21 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:25 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-24 09:47 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-24 11:08 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 16:36 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 11:57 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 17:06 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:07 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:06 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:00 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:22 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:41 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 12:48 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 18:11 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 07:35 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 08:42 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 09:00 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 14:03 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 18:13 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:12 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 20:57 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:10 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 21:23 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:37 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 17:07 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 17:28 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 10:17 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 08:33 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 12:22 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-31 17:26 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 12:32 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 09:50 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:07 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:37 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:14 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 15:09 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:11 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 21:24 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:35 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:41 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:41 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:43 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:32 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:42 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 12:27 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 09:49 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 10:12 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:06 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 10:26 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 10:38 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 16:44 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 15:20 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 22:28 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-26 16:15 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 21:51 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-27 04:25 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-27 07:15 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 13:37 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 11:47 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 10:29 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 11:49 -0700
LINUX SUCKS AND SO DO YOU. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:05 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-21 11:54 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 08:16 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-18 09:08 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-24 20:36 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-21 03:39 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-21 08:38 -0300
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:03 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:04 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-15 22:13 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:41 -0700
Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-15 18:17 -0400
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:26 -0700
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:54 -0500
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 06:57 -0500
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:23 -0500
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:21 -0700
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:26 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:56 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-16 09:41 -0400
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 00:00 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-17 08:13 -0400
Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:31 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 19:31 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:30 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:22 -0700
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-24 08:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why Linux is a success. |
| Message-ID | <n0g0bt$97d$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #321449 |
On 9/18/2015 8:54 AM, chrisv wrote: > JEDIDIAH wrote: > >>> lying asshole "-hh" wrote: >>>> >>>> Gosh, that's an interesting set of expectations when you try to make >>>> mere survival to be synonymous with success. > > Indeed it is "interesting" that one company, peddling mediocre > products, manages to dominate a market with ~90% share. > > Some us us (those of us with more than two brain cells) are > smart-enough to realize that only a fscked-up market, a market that > lacks real choice, could be in such a state. That's pretty obvious when one stops to realize anybody who isn't M$ either gives away their software or is in a niche M$ isn't interested in or can't enter. >> That's remarkable enough in the desktop PC market. > > Indeed, and if it were not for the protection of the GPL, M$ would > have wiped it out, one way or the other. They only allowed the Mac to > survive and retain a niche, at the high-end, so that they could claim > to not be a monopoly. There's also the fact they get to sell M$-Orifice to Crapple owners for big money, and even Windoze itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why Linux is a success. |
| Message-ID | <8d4a54c7-02e3-4ac5-9f8a-47fce1a5b496@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #321436 |
JEDIDIAH wrote: > > -hh wrote: > >> ronb wrote: > >>> JEDIDIAH wrote: > >>> > >>>> It's not just free, it's well supported well enough to be useful. > >>>> > >>>> This distinguishes it from all the platforms that DOS managed to > >>>> kill. > >>> > >>> Yep. And that's why the drooling WinDrones and iCultists hate it so. > >>> That's all it takes to be a success. > >> > >> Gosh, that's an interesting set of expectations when you try to make > >> mere survival to be synonymous with success. > > That's remarkable enough in the desktop PC market. Not remarkable at all, when you consider how in the 21st Century, the minimum requirements to have a virtual storefront are down to ~$10/month. > >> Applying the same metric, we can then see that the RonB's and JED's > >> definition of their future "successful" retirement life to be nothing more > >> than as a homeless tramp with a shopping cart of clothes, sleeping in > > You're trying to compare Linux with something like early 90s MacOS or > Windows when it is really much more robust than that. It may not have an > extra 2000 sqft but it's more than adequate for the job. Yes, Linux has evolved to be 'more than adequate' for 1990's vintage jobs. Which is something to keep in mind the next time that I need to grab an install disk before jumping into a time machine heading back into an age where the IT systems carried far lower expectations than today. > [deletia] > > Your idea of "success" is appearing to be able to waste money you don't > really have and being insolvent. A claim which is based on ... just what ... reference sources? Once again, you're trying to make yourself feel less bad by trying to drag others down to your level, and you've once again demonstrated that you're not above lying. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-24 20:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why Linux is a success. |
| Message-ID | <523a8a60-962c-4a61-a978-dfe723789898@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #321436 |
JEDIDIAH wrote: >On 2015-09-17, sbd <sbd....@safe-mail.net> wrote: >> On 09/17/2015 07:42 AM, -hh wrote: >>> ronb wrote: >>>> JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>> It's not just free, it's well supported well enough to be useful. >>>>> This distinguishes it from all the platforms that DOS managed to >>>>> kill. >>>> >>>> Yep. And that's why the drooling WinDrones and iCultists hate it so. >>>> That's all it takes to be a success. >>> >>> Gosh, that's an interesting set of expectations when you try to make >>> mere survival to be synonymous with success. > > That's remarkable enough in the desktop PC market. Not when you end up _trying_ to equate a multi-billion dollar corporation to a high school kid who dabbles on a distro during spring break. >>> Applying the same metric, we can then see that the RonB's and JED's >>> definition of their future "successful" retirement life to be nothing more >>> than as a homeless tramp with a shopping cart of clothes, sleeping in >>> a cardboard box under an overpass... > > You're trying to compare Linux with something like early 90s MacOS or > Windows when it is really much more robust than that. It may not have an > extra 2000 sqft but it's more than adequate for the job. Nope, it is what you're doing when you set such low expectations, which is also why you try to hide behind a "[deletia]" rather than to acknowledge the point, which was that Linux appeals to consumers with low product expectations. Case in point, your own words: JED: "...enough to be useful..." RonB: "[Hate from others is] all it takes to be a success." As usual, it is quite clear where the bitterness comes from, namely the aftertaste of Linux. A rock isn't a can opener, yet it can do enough damage to a can of beans to allow a desperate starving man to open it, so a rock gets summarized as "enough to be useful" type of replacement when one is lacking the actual right tool for the job. > Your idea of "success" is appearing to be able to waste money > you don't really have and being insolvent. A claim which is merely your wishful thinking as a defense mechanism to try to avoid reality giving you yet another smack right between the eyes. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 03:39 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why Linux is a success. |
| Message-ID | <mtofni$7rf$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #321241 |
On 9/17/2015 6:39 AM, sbd wrote: > On 09/17/2015 07:42 AM, -hh wrote: >> ronb wrote: >>> JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> [...] >> >> Applying the same metric, we can then see that the RonB's and JED's >> definition of their future "successful" retirement life to be nothing >> more than as a homeless tramp with a shopping cart of clothes, sleeping in >> a cardboard box under the local highway overpass. >> > Perhaps you are reflecting on your reality. If you could tell us which > highway overpass, I can come over and deliver some leftovers. "Leftovers" meaning what's left after the food has passed through the digestive process...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 08:38 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: Why Linux is a success. |
| Message-ID | <mtoq3l$ro1$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #321888 |
On 09/21/2015 05:39 AM, Nobody wrote: > On 9/17/2015 6:39 AM, sbd wrote: >> On 09/17/2015 07:42 AM, -hh wrote: >>> ronb wrote: >>>> JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> > [...] >>> >>> Applying the same metric, we can then see that the RonB's and JED's >>> definition of their future "successful" retirement life to be nothing >>> more than as a homeless tramp with a shopping cart of clothes, >>> sleeping in >>> a cardboard box under the local highway overpass. >>> >> Perhaps you are reflecting on your reality. If you could tell us which >> highway overpass, I can come over and deliver some leftovers. > > "Leftovers" meaning what's left after the food has passed through the > digestive process... > That would be cruel, but that is exactly what I meant! Yes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 22:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5rit6Fb3jcU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #321017 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:08:48 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-09-12, Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> wrote: >> By any metric when something is free yet is shunned the obvious >> conclusion is that whatever this product is, it is a failure. > > Nope. You're forgetting the most important metric of all: > > It hasn't been put out of business by Microsoft. > > [deletia] > > Better doesn't help you in a market that's been locked down > by one single vendor for longer than many current Internet users have > even been alive. > > It never did much good for Apple or ANY of the other commercial > alternatives that were all in their day much better than what MS was > producing. Right, Apple is totally screwed. You are a complete buffoon and moron. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 22:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Why Windows is a failure. |
| Message-ID | <mta4ll$h6n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #321017 |
Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots constantly for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often) reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who hate it so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 22:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Why Windows is a failure. |
| Message-ID | <fand0.kfdau@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #321029 |
ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of > catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be > adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots constantly > for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have > to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often) > reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed > and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers > from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has > numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is > often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who hate it > so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than > actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. Spoken like a true Bitter Old Biddy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 15:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why Windows is a failure. |
| Message-ID | <D21DEC9E.5BAE5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #321031 |
On 9/15/15, 3:13 PM, in article fand0.kfdau@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of >> catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be >> adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots constantly >> for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have >> to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often) >> reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed >> and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers >> from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has >> numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is >> often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who hate it >> so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than >> actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. > > Spoken like a true Bitter Old Biddy. > That is his newest groups of imaginary friends. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 18:17 -0400 |
| Subject | Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again |
| Message-ID | <5ekrnb39x079$.1z047blpeciu$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #321029 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:04:37 +0000 (UTC), ronb wrote: > Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of > catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be > adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots constantly > for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have > to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often) > reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed > and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers > from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has > numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is > often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who hate it > so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than > actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. Anyone thinking of trying Linux please read the above post, left fully intact. This is the type of lunatic Linux user that you will become very familiar with. Why? Because Linux won't work correctly out of the box for you, completely normal BTW, and these type of people will be the ones you will be turning to for help. Just read what this Linux using raving lunatic has written. Is this a bitter, jealous person or what? The Linux community is loaded with people like ronb. Is this the type of people you would like to associate with?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 15:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again |
| Message-ID | <D21DE90E.5BAD8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #321033 |
On 9/15/15, 3:17 PM, in article 5ekrnb39x079$.1z047blpeciu$.dlg@40tude.net, "scooz" <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:04:37 +0000 (UTC), ronb wrote: > >> Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of >> catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be >> adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots constantly >> for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have >> to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often) >> reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed >> and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers >> from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has >> numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is >> often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who hate it >> so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than >> actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. > > Anyone thinking of trying Linux please read the above post, left > fully intact. > This is the type of lunatic Linux user that you will become very > familiar with. Why? Because Linux won't work correctly out of the box > for you, completely normal BTW, and these type of people will be the > ones you will be turning to for help. > > Just read what this Linux using raving lunatic has written. > Is this a bitter, jealous person or what? > > The Linux community is loaded with people like ronb. > Is this the type of people you would like to associate with? > > The COLA "herd" actively works to dissuade people from using Linux. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 20:54 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again |
| Message-ID | <mtai4k$ci3$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #321033 |
On 9/15/2015 5:17 PM, scooz wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:04:37 +0000 (UTC), ronb wrote: > >> Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of >> catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be >> adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots constantly >> for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have >> to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often) >> reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed >> and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers >> from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has >> numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is >> often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who hate it >> so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than >> actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. > [...] > The Linux community is loaded with people like ronb. That's great news! > Is this the type of people you would like to associate with? Yes indeed! Ronb is A-1 in my books. I'd be proud to be associated with him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 06:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again |
| Message-ID | <hkliva5l50o8lda95ss1e3ilp5jauc0esb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #321073 |
Nobody wrote: > troll wrote: > >> The Linux community is loaded with people like ronb. > >That's great news! > >> Is this the type of people you would like to associate with? > >Yes indeed! Ronb is A-1 in my books. I'd be proud to be associated >with him. A hell of a lot better than being part of a frightened flock of sheep who attack anyone who leaves, that's for sure. "It's better in the flock. See how many more of us than there are of you? That proves it." Sheesh. -- "The Linux community is too divided and there is not a clear leader or example of Linux which convinces people to come over to Linux land." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 15:23 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again |
| Message-ID | <slrnmvjjut.e8h.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #321087 |
On 2015-09-16, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Nobody wrote:
>
>> troll wrote:
>>
>>> The Linux community is loaded with people like ronb.
>>
>>That's great news!
>>
>>> Is this the type of people you would like to associate with?
>>
>>Yes indeed! Ronb is A-1 in my books. I'd be proud to be associated
>>with him.
>
> A hell of a lot better than being part of a frightened flock of sheep
> who attack anyone who leaves, that's for sure.
The flock is not so bad.
It's the trolls that you really want to hun.
You can pity the rubes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 15:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again |
| Message-ID | <slrnmvjjse.e8h.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #321033 |
On 2015-09-15, scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:04:37 +0000 (UTC), ronb wrote:
>
>> Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of
>> catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be
>> adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots constantly
>> for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have
>> to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often)
>> reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed
>> and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers
>> from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has
>> numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is
>> often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who hate it
>> so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than
>> actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit.
>
> Anyone thinking of trying Linux please read the above post, left
> fully intact.
> This is the type of lunatic Linux user that you will become very
> familiar with. Why? Because Linux won't work correctly out of the box
> for you, completely normal BTW, and these type of people will be the
This is actually more likely to be the case for Windows than Linux.
People have just learned to tolerate the crap because they think they
are trapped. This goes back to when MS-DOS was nearly putting Apple
out of business.
Windows never works nearly as well as Lemmings try to claim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 15:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why Windows is a failure. |
| Message-ID | <D21DE806.5BACC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #321029 |
On 9/15/15, 3:04 PM, in article mta4ll$h6n$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of > catering to its customers. It only makes money for Microsoft IF it caters to the customers. For example, if desktop Linux catered to them better - given how it is free - MS would fizzle out quickly (or have to improve what they offer). Apple, in many ways, DOES cater to customers better BUT they do so at a higher cost (Apple does not serve the low end). So while Apple caters very well to many people there are many who will end up with Windows or Android (and of course there are times those are just better fits anyway). > You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be adopted to you. It is owned by a > monopoly. No, it is not. > It requires reboots constantly for almost every application installation. No, it does not. And your claiming this shows MASSIVE ignorance about it. > When it goes bonkers you have to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it > ... and then (often) reinstall it. What? Why re-install what you already installed? And with the rebooting you are confusing system updates, which DO what you say too often, with app updates which rarely require a reboot. > It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed Maybe you can explain some of the weaknesses you think it has. Or not. :) > and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. I agree the Registry is a poor design, but when was the last time you saw corruption? Been years for me. > Windows suffers from bitrot. How does it suffer from this any more than Linux? > It is, by design, a malware magnet. And, then, you must think the same of Android, right? > By design it has numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware > magnet. What backdoors? > It is often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons > who hate it so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than > actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. And here you just spew your anger. Yes, you are very angry at the choices you have made. OK. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 22:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Why Windows is a failure. |
| Message-ID | <d5rk94Fbg10U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #321029 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:04:37 +0000, ronb wrote: > Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of > catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be > adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots > constantly for almost every application installation. When it goes > bonkers you have to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... > and then (often) reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file > system ever designed and the Registry file is corruption waiting to > happen. Windows suffers from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. > By design it has numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware > magnet. It is often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget > morons who hate it so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux > Advocacy than actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. Some more idiotic blathering from wRonG. Windows isn't a failure by any metric. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 20:56 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why Windows is a failure. |
| Message-ID | <mtai8m$ci3$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #321029 |
On 9/15/2015 5:04 PM, ronb wrote: > Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of > catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be > adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots constantly > for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have > to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often) > reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed > and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers > from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has > numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is > often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who hate it > so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than > actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. Well said. Bravo!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 09:41 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Why Windows is a failure. |
| Message-ID | <mtbrfo$thv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #321074 |
On 9/15/2015 9:56 PM, Nobody wrote: > On 9/15/2015 5:04 PM, ronb wrote: >> Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of >> catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be >> adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots constantly >> for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have >> to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often) >> reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever designed >> and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers >> from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has >> numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is >> often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who hate it >> so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than >> actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. > > Well said. Bravo! > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 Good one, moron!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 00:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why Windows is a failure. |
| Message-ID | <mtdhd1$s1u$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #321096 |
On 9/16/2015 8:41 AM, DFS wrote: > On 9/15/2015 9:56 PM, Nobody wrote: >> On 9/15/2015 5:04 PM, ronb wrote: >>> Windows is a failure because it's designed to make money instead of >>> catering to its customers. You must learn to adopt to it, it will not be >>> adopted to you. It is owned by a monopoly. It requires reboots >>> constantly >>> for almost every application installation. When it goes bonkers you have >>> to reboot it ... and reboot it ... and reboot it ... and then (often) >>> reinstall it. It incorporates the most pathetic file system ever >>> designed >>> and the Registry file is corruption waiting to happen. Windows suffers >>> from bitrot. It is, by design, a malware magnet. By design it has >>> numerous backdoors, which is partly why it is a malware magnet. It is >>> often owned and used by mouth-breathing, mental midget morons who >>> hate it >>> so much that they would rather spew 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy than >>> actually use their Windows Malware Magnet shit. >> >> Well said. Bravo! >> > > > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 > Thunderbird/38.2.0 > > > Good one, moron! If I did not use Windows, what would be my basis for agreeing with ronb or preferring Linux over it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web