Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #320012 > unrolled thread
| Started by | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-10 16:18 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-11 14:08 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 248 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-10 16:18 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 21:35 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-11 09:42 -0300
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 12:58 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-11 14:15 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-11 18:34 -0300
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-11 17:41 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 15:28 -0700
The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 01:35 +0200
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 17:16 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 02:25 +0200
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 17:49 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 05:42 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 22:18 -0700
Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:30 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 09:34 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:52 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 10:00 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 18:29 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 11:37 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:39 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:43 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:40 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 18:53 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:09 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 22:15 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 06:45 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 09:09 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:09 -0500
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:17 -0700
Where are your quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:42 -0500
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:09 +0200
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 08:29 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 09:28 -0400
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 08:26 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 12:12 -0400
Hi, Drew P. Bawls! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:38 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 12:46 -0400
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 18:42 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 20:39 -0400
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:02 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 22:54 -0400
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:21 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:15 -0600
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:09 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 13:06 -0600
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 12:10 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:04 -0600
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 20:43 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:13 -0600
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:37 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-13 04:40 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:17 -0600
Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 06:02 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 22:18 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:33 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 09:55 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 18:37 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 11:38 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 21:45 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 23:05 +0200
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 00:42 +0200
Re: Peter Köhlmann admits Linux does not handle many tasks well Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:48 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 22:22 +0000
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:44 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 00:46 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 02:07 +0200
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 00:10 +0000
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:27 -0500
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:17 -0600
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 10:32 -0700
Where's the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:29 -0500
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:32 -0700
Tasks Linux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails utterly Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 00:38 +0200
Re: Tasks Linux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails utterly Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:46 -0700
Re: Tasks Linux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails utterly Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 01:01 +0200
Re: Tasks Linux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails utterly Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 16:15 -0700
Where's the OS X setting? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:33 -0500
Re: Where's the OS X setting? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 09:13 -0700
Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:13 -0500
Re: Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:17 -0700
Re: Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:37 -0500
Re: Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:19 -0700
Re: Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:34 -0500
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 01:13 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 18:04 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:14 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 18:30 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:59 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 19:14 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:27 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 22:20 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:42 -0500
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 09:33 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:36 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:34 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 06:09 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:39 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:44 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 19:52 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 21:00 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:43 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 19:51 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:18 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0700
Micheal Glasser is a lying piece of shit! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:47 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:28 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:19 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:01 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-15 21:45 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:27 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:42 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:31 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:20 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:03 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:22 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 11:25 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 16:40 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:50 +0000
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 09:05 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:45 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:43 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 12:05 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:41 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 12:42 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 20:56 +0200
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:41 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:52 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:45 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:08 -0500
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:25 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 16:50 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 22:05 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 23:50 +0200
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 20:41 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:46 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-14 22:10 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-14 21:54 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-15 07:48 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-15 05:40 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-15 11:56 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-15 14:12 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-15 22:28 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-15 20:27 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-16 08:17 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-16 16:24 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-17 08:31 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-18 09:25 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-18 20:10 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-18 17:26 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-18 23:45 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-19 05:56 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-21 08:26 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-21 07:56 -0500
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 10:03 -0500
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-13 09:10 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-21 07:26 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-15 08:38 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 10:18 -0500
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:14 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-10 17:38 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-11 00:12 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 22:23 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-10 19:53 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-10 17:06 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:50 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 18:54 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:37 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 22:22 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 02:04 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:40 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 22:25 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 12:16 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 09:42 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros - correction Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 09:52 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros - correction GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:27 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 18:42 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:49 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:26 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-13 04:45 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:48 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:51 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:34 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-10 19:02 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-10 16:11 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-11 09:25 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 00:38 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-11 09:31 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-11 07:57 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-11 14:21 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-11 15:00 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-11 16:23 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-14 17:13 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:48 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-11 14:17 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-11 14:16 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:49 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:42 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:57 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:49 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:54 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:35 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-14 17:10 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:43 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:51 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 01:10 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:22 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:26 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:31 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 01:33 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:36 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:47 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:48 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 00:12 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 00:20 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:08 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-14 21:07 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:08 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:49 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:50 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-14 22:02 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 10:05 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-15 12:38 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:16 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:41 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 17:38 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-15 15:03 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 12:24 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:16 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:16 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 23:52 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:02 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-16 01:16 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 16:21 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 23:31 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-15 16:59 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:17 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:01 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:24 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-15 08:51 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:49 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:06 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:48 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:05 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:25 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-11 14:08 -0600
Page 12 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 16:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D21CAAFF.5B90A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #320778 |
On 9/14/15, 4:31 PM, in article d5p3miFmidnU3@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Well, apple buries millions upon míllions on advertising. And ends up >>> with a market share not much higher than linux which is not advertised >>> at all >>> >>> I would call that a "gigantic failure" >> >> As usual and in "Snit" fashion, the Bitter Old Biddy conveniently misses >> the point. By "not getting any traction," I (obviously in context) meant >> in its competition with Microsoft Windows. Go suck another lemon >> "Lloyd," >> you bitter old bitch. > > No lemons involved you prissy bitch! > > I think I read somewhere that Apple has far exceeded MS in the one biggest > metric that all companies aspire to, and that is PROFITS! Not to mention > the huge market value difference. So for those things that really count > in business, Apple has far exceeded MS by miles. Linux isn't even on the > road yet! Oh, Dell and HP are raking in money on their desktop Linux offerings. Or not. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 16:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D21CAB58.5B90B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #320777 |
On 9/14/15, 4:26 PM, in article mt7l40$qsi$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to >>>> succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their >>>> $Billions and slick advertisements. >>> >>> Right, Apple is going broke selling Macs! What a complete dunce you >>> and Jed show yourselves to be!! >>> >>> >> Well, apple buries millions upon míllions on advertising. And ends up >> with a market share not much higher than linux which is not advertised >> at all >> >> I would call that a "gigantic failure" > > As usual and in "Snit" fashion, the Bitter Old Biddy conveniently misses > the point. By "not getting any traction," I (obviously in context) meant > in its competition with Microsoft Windows. Go suck another lemon "Lloyd," > you bitter old bitch. So you are using a metric to rate Apple by which they do not push to get. Huh? Are you really that ignorant? Apple makes it very clear they want high quality products - and sell them for a higher price than the average PC. They do not strive to have OS X beat Windows in market share. You really know NOTHING of the desktop world. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 22:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mt7u5b$hif$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #320765 |
On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> DFS wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros. >>>>> >>>>> The same goes for MacOS despite a brand that predates WinDOS, >>>>> very >>>>> competent marketing, plenty of unpaid shills in the news media, and >>>>> dedicated stores. >>>> >>>> >>>> Not quite the same: MacOS/X has about 10x the user base of the most >>>> popular Linux distro (Ubuntu). >> >> It's exactly the same. You're just either dishonest or stupid. >> >> >>> Bullshit. OSX has just sligthly more users than linux. And is declining >>> fast >> >> It doesn't matter. The same insult he tries to use against Linux >> applies >> to MacOS for the same reason. Numbers are numbers. Fanboys are migets >> trying to call dwarves tiny. >> >> Perhaps they realize the inconvenient truth and need to lash out... > > Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to > succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their $Billions > and slick advertisements. 'can't get any traction'? What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 million+ expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 10:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mt8jcu$bhb$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #320826 |
DFS wrote: > On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>> DFS wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros. >>>>>> >>>>>> The same goes for MacOS despite a brand that predates WinDOS, >>>>>> very >>>>>> competent marketing, plenty of unpaid shills in the news media, and >>>>>> dedicated stores. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Not quite the same: MacOS/X has about 10x the user base of the most >>>>> popular Linux distro (Ubuntu). >>> >>> It's exactly the same. You're just either dishonest or stupid. >>> >>> >>>> Bullshit. OSX has just sligthly more users than linux. And is declining >>>> fast >>> >>> It doesn't matter. The same insult he tries to use against Linux >>> applies >>> to MacOS for the same reason. Numbers are numbers. Fanboys are migets >>> trying to call dwarves tiny. >>> >>> Perhaps they realize the inconvenient truth and need to lash out... >> >> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to >> succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their $Billions >> and slick advertisements. > > > 'can't get any traction'? > > What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 million+ > expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. > > Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 12:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <bjclcc-tlr.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #320869 |
It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: > DFS wrote: > >> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The same goes for MacOS despite a brand that predates WinDOS, >>>>>>> very >>>>>>> competent marketing, plenty of unpaid shills in the news media, and >>>>>>> dedicated stores. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not quite the same: MacOS/X has about 10x the user base of the most >>>>>> popular Linux distro (Ubuntu). >>>> >>>> It's exactly the same. You're just either dishonest or stupid. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Bullshit. OSX has just sligthly more users than linux. And is declining >>>>> fast >>>> >>>> It doesn't matter. The same insult he tries to use against Linux >>>> applies >>>> to MacOS for the same reason. Numbers are numbers. Fanboys are migets >>>> trying to call dwarves tiny. >>>> >>>> Perhaps they realize the inconvenient truth and need to lash out... >>> >>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to >>> succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their $Billions >>> and slick advertisements. >> >> >> 'can't get any traction'? >> >> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 million+ >> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. >> >> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. > > And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? Apple gets *very* large profits from small sales. http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-incredible-profits-and-small-market-share-2013-5?IR=T "Apple reports largest profit in history." - Jan 27th 2015 IDC smartphone share Q2 - 2015 Android 82% - iOS 13.9% (Oh, & for those that are interested, windoze phones are at 2.6%) "Go figure" as they say. Reminds me of the old adage "A fool & his money are soon parted." -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.2.0-3.g2219279-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Sep 7 08:57:09 UTC 2015 (2219279) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 14:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <hvqdnaxn9_8o4WXInZ2dnUU7-Y_us__v@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #320878 |
On 09/15/15 05:38, William Poaster wrote: > It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: > >> DFS wrote: >> >>> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The same goes for MacOS despite a brand that predates WinDOS, >>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>> competent marketing, plenty of unpaid shills in the news media, and >>>>>>>> dedicated stores. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not quite the same: MacOS/X has about 10x the user base of the most >>>>>>> popular Linux distro (Ubuntu). >>>>> >>>>> It's exactly the same. You're just either dishonest or stupid. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit. OSX has just sligthly more users than linux. And is declining >>>>>> fast >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't matter. The same insult he tries to use against Linux >>>>> applies >>>>> to MacOS for the same reason. Numbers are numbers. Fanboys are migets >>>>> trying to call dwarves tiny. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps they realize the inconvenient truth and need to lash out... >>>> >>>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to >>>> succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their $Billions >>>> and slick advertisements. >>> >>> >>> 'can't get any traction'? >>> >>> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 million+ >>> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. >>> >>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. >> >> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? > > Apple gets *very* large profits from small sales. > http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-incredible-profits-and-small-market-share-2013-5?IR=T > > "Apple reports largest profit in history." - Jan 27th 2015 > > IDC smartphone share Q2 - 2015 > Android 82% - iOS 13.9% > > (Oh,& for those that are interested, windoze phones are at 2.6%) > > "Go figure" as they say. > > Reminds me of the old adage "A fool& his money are soon parted." > So who took all of your money? -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 15:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mt9e7q$ios$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #320869 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:05:36 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > DFS wrote: >> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 >> million+ >> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. >> >> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. > > And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? And still, DooFuS, percentage-wise (have some five year old explain the concept to you) Apple is a failure in the PC market. Which, of course, was my point. You members of the Bitter Old Brain-Dead Biddy Committee, just aren't that swift, are you? -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 17:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5r3d7F7694U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #320911 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:41:46 +0000, ronb wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:05:36 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> DFS wrote: > >>> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 >>> million+ >>> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. >>> >>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. >> >> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? > > And still, DooFuS, percentage-wise (have some five year old explain the > concept to you) Apple is a failure in the PC market. Which, of course, > was my point. You members of the Bitter Old Brain-Dead Biddy Committee, > just aren't that swift, are you? It most certainly is not a failure in the PC market space. It is the premium end of that market and the most profitable by far. That you can't see that just shows your ignorance. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 15:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mt9pvh$70v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #320911 |
On 9/15/2015 11:41 AM, ronb wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:05:36 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>> DFS wrote:
>
>>> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100
>>> million+ expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in
>>> the world.
>>>
>>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations.
>>
>> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money?
>
> And still, DooFuS, percentage-wise (have some five year old explain
> the concept to you) Apple is a failure in the PC market.
You never said that about Linux, whose share is 1/3 of Apple's. Why
didn't you say 'Linux is a failure in the PC market', wRonG?
Now slink away like an advocate always does.
> Which, of course, was my point.
Funny how you snipped your idiot "point":
"And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to
succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their
$Billions and slick advertisements."
100 million+ sales of an expensive and very profitable computer is lots
of "traction", moron.
> You members of the Bitter Old Brain-Dead Biddy Committee, just aren't
> that swift, are you?
As a group, the "Wintrolls" here are MUCH more intelligent than the pack
of lying idiots who call themselves "advocates".
You: "Apple's empire is falling apart, bit by bit." (Apr 2012)
heh! What an idiot.
Christopher Hunter - advocate extraordinaire:
* "we have (out of about 450 homes in this neighbourhood) roughly 61%
Linux, 35% Mac and 4% who were too ashamed to admit to anything!"
(Feb 2007)
* "Linux uptake in /this/ neighbourhood (of roughly 120 dwellings)?
88%! The rest are almost entirely Macs, with just /one/ Windoze XP
machine used by a kid who plays games." (Mar 2008)
Notice his 'neighborhood' magically shrank by 70% in a year, while the
Linux uptake magically grew from 61% to 88% in the same year. Is it
another Linux miracle... or is it another lying Linux dirtbag?
Dumb Willie Poaster: "Astounding! A tailwind reduces lift?!?!?! How
in hell does a kite fly then?"
JHC.
shitv: "users no longer need Windows."
shitv: "malware is a natural and healthy phenomena"
shitv: "it is impossible to become a billionaire while competing
fairly with others. No one is that fscking great. Some unfair
advantage(s) must be obtained."
"uh duh... Im turdv... Im yur intelektool soopeareear"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 12:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D21DBE61.5BA77%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #320961 |
On 9/15/15, 12:03 PM, in article mt9pvh$70v$1@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 9/15/2015 11:41 AM, ronb wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:05:36 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> DFS wrote: >> >>>> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 >>>> million+ expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in >>>> the world. >>>> >>>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. >>> >>> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? >> >> And still, DooFuS, percentage-wise (have some five year old explain >> the concept to you) Apple is a failure in the PC market. > > You never said that about Linux, whose share is 1/3 of Apple's. Why > didn't you say 'Linux is a failure in the PC market', wRonG? > > Now slink away like an advocate always does. > > > >> Which, of course, was my point. > > Funny how you snipped your idiot "point": > > "And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to > succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their > $Billions and slick advertisements." > > 100 million+ sales of an expensive and very profitable computer is lots > of "traction", moron. ronb is stuck on the idea of user base / marketshare as if that is the only measure of success. For a groups of products such as those in the desktop Linux family, where they can be generally had for no cost and run on existing hardware, there is a strong correlation here (though there are also other factors). And here desktop Linux is shown to do poorly. But for a product which runs only on the hardware of one company (at least in any supported way) and is not sold on cheaper hardware, user base is a poor measure of success. Does not mean that a gain in share is not a good sign for such a product nor that a loss in share would not be a possible bad measure, but to compare the share of such a product with the low end of the market is absurd. Comes down to ronb being completely clueless of even the basics... making excuses for desktop Linux's poor adoption ratings and trying to make it sound like OS X HIGHER adoption ratings are somehow a sign OS X is not as good. Completely irrational of him. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 14:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <hvqdna1n9_8F4WXInZ2dnUU7-Y_us__v@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #320869 |
On 09/15/15 02:05, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > DFS wrote: > >> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The same goes for MacOS despite a brand that predates WinDOS, >>>>>>> very >>>>>>> competent marketing, plenty of unpaid shills in the news media, and >>>>>>> dedicated stores. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not quite the same: MacOS/X has about 10x the user base of the most >>>>>> popular Linux distro (Ubuntu). >>>> >>>> It's exactly the same. You're just either dishonest or stupid. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Bullshit. OSX has just sligthly more users than linux. And is declining >>>>> fast >>>> >>>> It doesn't matter. The same insult he tries to use against Linux >>>> applies >>>> to MacOS for the same reason. Numbers are numbers. Fanboys are migets >>>> trying to call dwarves tiny. >>>> >>>> Perhaps they realize the inconvenient truth and need to lash out... >>> >>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to >>> succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their $Billions >>> and slick advertisements. >> >> >> 'can't get any traction'? >> >> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 million+ >> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. >> >> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. > > And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? Maybe it's because you are too stuck in the past with old programming methodologies. Meaning, you can't grok Apples paradigm, old fart. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 16:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmvh2lf.9dr.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #320869 |
On 2015-09-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > DFS wrote: > >> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> [deletia] >>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to >>> succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their $Billions >>> and slick advertisements. >> >> >> 'can't get any traction'? >> >> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 million+ >> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. ...and the snit circle circus continues. The current success is all about it's products that aren't PCs. >> >> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. > > And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? I don't care if MacOS is crap or not, the machines certainly are. Although the big deal breaker is the lack of commercial software. This is where the still marginal aspect of MacOS rears it's ugly head.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 23:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mta3rt$epn$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #321018 |
JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-09-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> DFS wrote: >> >>> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>> > > [deletia] > >>>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be to >>>> succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their $Billions >>>> and slick advertisements. >>> >>> >>> 'can't get any traction'? >>> >>> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 million+ >>> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. > > ...and the snit circle circus continues. > > The current success is all about it's products that aren't PCs. > >>> >>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. >> >> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? > > I don't care if MacOS is crap or not, the machines certainly are. Not really. The hardware is OK. Just way too expensive. You get much faster machines for that price
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 22:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5riqvFb3jcU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #321025 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:52:47 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-09-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> DFS wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> [deletia] >> >>>>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be >>>>> to succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their >>>>> $Billions and slick advertisements. >>>> >>>> >>>> 'can't get any traction'? >>>> >>>> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 >>>> million+ >>>> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. >> >> ...and the snit circle circus continues. >> >> The current success is all about it's products that aren't PCs. >> >> >>>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. >>> >>> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? >> >> I don't care if MacOS is crap or not, the machines certainly are. > > Not really. The hardware is OK. Just way too expensive. You get much > faster machines for that price Yes you can get faster machines for less. As long as you like plastic laptops and crap towers. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 01:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mta8o1$4jd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #321027 |
Lloyd Parsons wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:52:47 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-09-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>> DFS wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> [deletia] >>> >>>>>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be >>>>>> to succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their >>>>>> $Billions and slick advertisements. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 'can't get any traction'? >>>>> >>>>> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 >>>>> million+ >>>>> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. >>> >>> ...and the snit circle circus continues. >>> >>> The current success is all about it's products that aren't PCs. >>> >>> >>>>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. >>>> >>>> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? >>> >>> I don't care if MacOS is crap or not, the machines certainly are. >> >> Not really. The hardware is OK. Just way too expensive. You get much >> faster machines for that price > > Yes you can get faster machines for less. As long as you like plastic > laptops There is plastic. And then there is plastic. Some are of much higher qualitiy than a Apple laptop, chiseled out by hand out of a aircraft-ready alu-block by cinderellas dwarves > and crap towers. You mean like apples towers? With expandability homing in on zero point zero? And a price tag as if the box is made out of mitril >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 16:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D21DF615.5BAFA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #321047 |
On 9/15/15, 4:16 PM, in article mta8o1$4jd$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. >>>>> >>>>> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? >>>> >>>> I don't care if MacOS is crap or not, the machines certainly are. >>> >>> Not really. The hardware is OK. Just way too expensive. You get much >>> faster machines for that price >> >> Yes you can get faster machines for less. As long as you like plastic >> laptops > > There is plastic. And then there is plastic. Sure, not all are the same. Some feel flimsy and cheap... others not so much. OK. > Some are of much higher qualitiy than a Apple laptop, chiseled out by hand > out of a aircraft-ready alu-block by cinderellas dwarves And you have no idea about hardware. OK. >> and crap towers. > > You mean like apples towers? > With expandability homing in on zero point zero? And a price tag as if the > box is made out of mitril Yeah, you can only connect somewhere over 100 devices at a time. No expandability at all! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 23:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5ro31Fcb2hU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #321047 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 01:16:02 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Lloyd Parsons wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:52:47 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-09-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> [deletia] >>>> >>>>>>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to >>>>>>> be to succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all >>>>>>> their $Billions and slick advertisements. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 'can't get any traction'? >>>>>> >>>>>> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 >>>>>> million+ >>>>>> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. >>>> >>>> ...and the snit circle circus continues. >>>> >>>> The current success is all about it's products that aren't PCs. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. >>>>> >>>>> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? >>>> >>>> I don't care if MacOS is crap or not, the machines certainly are. >>> >>> Not really. The hardware is OK. Just way too expensive. You get much >>> faster machines for that price >> >> Yes you can get faster machines for less. As long as you like plastic >> laptops > > There is plastic. And then there is plastic. > Some are of much higher qualitiy than a Apple laptop, chiseled out by > hand out of a aircraft-ready alu-block by cinderellas dwarves > And those aren't cheaper than Macs or MacBooks either, or at least not by much. >> and crap towers. > > You mean like apples towers? > With expandability homing in on zero point zero? And a price tag as if > the box is made out of mitril > > Great box I guess. Since I'm not one of those it is designed for, I haven't spent much time thinking about or looking at them. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 16:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a4e22991-fb43-485c-aa18-e6004f99c4e3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #321047 |
Peter writes:
> Lloyd Parsons wrote:
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>> Not really. The hardware is OK. Just way too expensive. You get much
>>> faster machines for that price
>>
>> Yes you can get faster machines for less. As long as you like plastic
>> laptops
>
> There is plastic. And then there is plastic.
> Some are of much higher qualitiy than a Apple laptop, chiseled out by hand
> out of a aircraft-ready alu-block by cinderellas dwarves
Care to name specific grades with product examples? Didn't think so.
In any case, the reality is that changing from Apple's Aluminum
case to the typically used injection molded plastic saves the Dells
only around {$20 vs $5} = $15 or so.
>> and crap towers.
>
> You mean like apples towers?
Clearly not.
> With expandability homing in on zero point zero?
None...Except for Thunderbolt, which is akin to having
externally accessible PCI bus lanes without the physical
constraints of having to fit inside the box.
> And a price tag as if the box is made out of mitril
But with the irony being that no one could match the trash can's
hardware specs at the Apple retail price...ie, to not buy Apple
means spending even more than Mithril
-hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 15:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmvjjjj.e8h.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #321047 |
On 2015-09-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> Lloyd Parsons wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:52:47 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>
>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-09-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>> DFS wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> DFS wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
[deletia]
>>>>>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations.
>>>>>
>>>>> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money?
>>>>
>>>> I don't care if MacOS is crap or not, the machines certainly are.
>>>
>>> Not really. The hardware is OK. Just way too expensive. You get much
>>> faster machines for that price
>>
>> Yes you can get faster machines for less. As long as you like plastic
>> laptops
You've managed to zero in on the single most irrelevant superficial
sort of thing while completely ingoring a whole universe of potentially
meaningful issues.
You demonstrate zero actual clue or originality while you mindlessly
repeat Apple marketing platitudes.
>
> There is plastic. And then there is plastic.
> Some are of much higher qualitiy than a Apple laptop, chiseled out by hand
> out of a aircraft-ready alu-block by cinderellas dwarves
>
>> and crap towers.
Again, nothing of actual substance.
Basically "cats rule and dogs drool".
>
> You mean like apples towers?
> With expandability homing in on zero point zero? And a price tag as if the
> box is made out of mitril
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 22:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5ripkFb3jcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #321018 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:16:31 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-09-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> DFS wrote: >> >>> On 9/14/2015 6:43 PM, ronb wrote: >>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:10:46 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-09-10, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/10/2015 5:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > [deletia] > >>>> Yep. And Mac OSX is all the things the trolls say Linux needs to be >>>> to succeed -- and yet they can't get any traction with all their >>>> $Billions and slick advertisements. >>> >>> >>> 'can't get any traction'? >>> >>> What kind of childish moron are you, wRonG? Apple has sold 100 >>> million+ >>> expensive Macs, and became the most valuable company in the world. > > ...and the snit circle circus continues. > > The current success is all about it's products that aren't PCs. > Nope, wrong again Jed. While the portable products are the biggest part these days, they are having increased sales of desktops/laptops and making plenty of money on them too. > >>> Linux distros still struggle to get $5/month donations. >> >> And still OSX is crap. Why is that, with all that money? > > I don't care if MacOS is crap or not, the machines certainly are. > > Although the big deal breaker is the lack of commercial software. > > This is where the still marginal aspect of MacOS rears it's ugly > head. They aren't crap, they are just more expensive than you can afford. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web