Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #318088 > unrolled thread
| Started by | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-31 17:55 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-08-31 17:00 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 319 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
The public demands hundreds of Linux distros 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-08-31 17:55 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 10:17 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros dunno <dunno@dunno.dunno> - 2015-08-31 19:00 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:57 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-31 15:54 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 13:19 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ubuntuking69@gmail.com - 2015-08-31 15:16 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 23:39 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 16:49 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:45 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-01 01:04 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 01:40 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 18:53 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:01 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 04:18 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:34 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 20:59 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 08:43 +0200
The public demands hundreds of Linux distros - NOT John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:36 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-03 11:58 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 17:04 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 01:36 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 02:28 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 15:51 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-05 23:15 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 21:26 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 19:01 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-06 01:08 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-06 01:10 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 19:14 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-05 21:13 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 22:05 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 18:59 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-10 16:18 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 21:35 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-11 09:42 -0300
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 12:58 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-11 14:15 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-11 18:34 -0300
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-11 17:41 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 15:28 -0700
The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 01:35 +0200
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 17:16 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 02:25 +0200
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 17:49 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 05:42 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 22:18 -0700
Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:30 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 09:34 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:52 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 10:00 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 18:29 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 11:37 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:39 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:43 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:40 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 18:53 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:09 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 22:15 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 06:45 +0100
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 09:09 -0700
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:09 -0500
Re: Why don't you just use OS X, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:17 -0700
Where are your quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:42 -0500
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:09 +0200
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 08:29 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 09:28 -0400
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 08:26 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 12:12 -0400
Hi, Drew P. Bawls! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:38 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 12:46 -0400
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 18:42 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 20:39 -0400
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:02 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 22:54 -0400
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:21 +0100
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:15 -0600
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:09 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 13:06 -0600
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 12:10 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:04 -0600
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 20:43 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:13 -0600
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:37 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-13 04:40 -0700
Re: The public demands flogging of bullshit artists GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:17 -0600
Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 06:02 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 22:18 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:33 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 09:55 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 18:37 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 11:38 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 21:45 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 23:05 +0200
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 00:42 +0200
Re: Peter Köhlmann admits Linux does not handle many tasks well Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:48 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 22:22 +0000
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:44 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 00:46 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 02:07 +0200
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 00:10 +0000
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:27 -0500
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:17 -0600
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 10:32 -0700
Where's the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:29 -0500
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:32 -0700
Tasks Linux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails utterly Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 00:38 +0200
Re: Tasks Linux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails utterly Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:46 -0700
Re: Tasks Linux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails utterly Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 01:01 +0200
Re: Tasks Linux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails utterly Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 16:15 -0700
Where's the OS X setting? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:33 -0500
Re: Where's the OS X setting? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 09:13 -0700
Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:13 -0500
Re: Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:17 -0700
Re: Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:37 -0500
Re: Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:19 -0700
Re: Where are the quotes, Micheal Glasser? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:34 -0500
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 01:13 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 18:04 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:14 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 18:30 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:59 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 19:14 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:27 +0100
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 22:20 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:42 -0500
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Tasks LInux does better than the "competition." -- Snit fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 09:33 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:36 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:34 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 06:09 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:39 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:44 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 19:52 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 21:00 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:43 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 19:51 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:18 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0700
Micheal Glasser is a lying piece of shit! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:47 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:28 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:19 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:01 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-15 21:45 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:27 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:42 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:31 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:20 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:03 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:22 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 11:25 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 16:40 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:50 +0000
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 09:05 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:45 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:43 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 12:05 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:41 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 12:42 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 20:56 +0200
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:41 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:52 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:45 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 04:08 -0500
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:25 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 16:50 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 22:05 +0100
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 23:50 +0200
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 20:41 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:46 -0600
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-14 22:10 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-14 21:54 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-15 07:48 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-15 05:40 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-15 11:56 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-15 14:12 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-15 22:28 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-15 20:27 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-16 08:17 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-16 16:24 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-17 08:31 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-18 09:25 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-18 20:10 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-18 17:26 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-18 23:45 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-19 05:56 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-21 08:26 -0300
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-21 07:56 -0500
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 10:03 -0500
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-13 09:10 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-21 07:26 -0700
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-15 08:38 -0400
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 10:18 -0500
Re: Linux users demand 85.7% of an egg GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:14 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-10 17:38 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-11 00:12 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 22:23 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-10 19:53 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-10 17:06 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:50 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 18:54 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:37 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 22:22 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 02:04 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:40 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 22:25 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 12:16 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 09:42 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros - correction Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 09:52 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros - correction GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:27 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 18:42 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:49 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:26 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-13 04:45 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:48 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:51 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:34 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-10 19:02 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-10 16:11 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-11 09:25 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 00:38 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-11 09:31 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-11 07:57 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-11 14:21 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-11 15:00 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-11 16:23 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-14 17:13 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:48 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-11 14:17 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-11 14:16 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:49 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:42 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:57 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:49 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:54 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:35 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-14 17:10 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:43 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:51 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 01:10 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:22 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:26 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:31 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 01:33 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:36 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:47 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:48 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 00:12 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 00:20 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:08 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-14 21:07 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:08 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:49 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:50 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-14 22:02 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 10:05 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-15 12:38 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:16 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:41 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 17:38 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-15 15:03 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 12:24 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:16 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:16 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 23:52 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:02 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-16 01:16 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 16:21 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 23:31 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-15 16:59 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:17 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:01 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:24 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-15 08:51 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:49 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:06 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:48 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:05 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:25 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-11 14:08 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 10:30 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-03 13:51 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 01:45 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ubuntuking69@gmail.com - 2015-09-01 08:24 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-01 12:44 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 13:19 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-01 14:47 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-31 20:00 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-31 20:05 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros ubuntuking69@gmail.com - 2015-09-01 08:25 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-01 12:44 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-01 07:44 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-01 14:35 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-01 09:23 -0500
You're losing it, Turdv. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-01 11:50 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 12:23 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 12:03 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 10:47 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 20:41 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 12:10 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-01 14:16 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 12:23 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 21:37 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 12:52 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 22:02 +0200
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 14:01 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0000
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-03 12:00 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-04 07:45 -0500
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-04 08:55 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-01 11:47 -0600
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 17:59 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 20:42 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 02:06 +0100
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 18:32 -0700
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-13 07:00 -0400
Re: The public demands hundreds of Linux distros William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-13 13:10 +0100
Re: 7 is a delusional liar "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-31 17:00 -0400
Page 2 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 16 Next page →
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 17:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d4rctjF8j96U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #318825 |
On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:58:31 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-09-01, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> John Gohde wrote: >> >>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:04:38 PM UTC-4, vallor wrote: >>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:39:32 +0000, ronb wrote: >>>> >>>> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:16:15 -0700, ubuntuking69 wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:54:26 PM UTC+2, DFS wrote: >>>> >>> On 8/31/2015 12:55 PM, 7 wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> > The public demands hundreds of Linux distros >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Idiot. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> The public demands about 10 distros. > > [deletia] > >>>> And why naysayers would want to limit that freedom would not seem to >>>> be rational -- or at the very least, ethical. >>> >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> The Public Wants Mint, NOT Arch Linux >> >> The public uses whatever they want, not what a dimbulb like you >> declares > > I would expect the public at large to be able to handle Mint more > than > Arch but I don't think that really matters. We are not here to ban each > other's choices. > The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros. > After years of being trolled by the Lemmings and the Fanboys, it is > clear that none of us has any reason to panic. As long as we are able to > continue using what we have chosen, it's all good. There's no impending > doom or tragedy. We don't have to worry about our personal version of > Atari going bust. Those days are gone for us. > Yep, it is just fine as a hobbyist/developer/geek OS with no general desktop use of any significance. > That is true of Linux in general as well as any particular variant. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 01:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mse2h5$pbu$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #318828 |
On 9/3/2015 12:04 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:58:31 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-09-01, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> John Gohde wrote: >>> >>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:04:38 PM UTC-4, vallor wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:39:32 +0000, ronb wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:16:15 -0700, ubuntuking69 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:54:26 PM UTC+2, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/31/2015 12:55 PM, 7 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The public demands hundreds of Linux distros >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Idiot. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The public demands about 10 distros. >> >> [deletia] >> >>>>> And why naysayers would want to limit that freedom would not seem to >>>>> be rational -- or at the very least, ethical. >>>> >>>> >>>> ??? >>>> >>>> The Public Wants Mint, NOT Arch Linux >>> >>> The public uses whatever they want, not what a dimbulb like you >>> declares >> >> I would expect the public at large to be able to handle Mint more >> than >> Arch but I don't think that really matters. We are not here to ban each >> other's choices. >> > The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros. > >> After years of being trolled by the Lemmings and the Fanboys, it is >> clear that none of us has any reason to panic. As long as we are able to >> continue using what we have chosen, it's all good. There's no impending >> doom or tragedy. We don't have to worry about our personal version of >> Atari going bust. Those days are gone for us. >> > Yep, it is just fine as a hobbyist/developer/geek OS with no general > desktop use of any significance. > > >> That is true of Linux in general as well as any particular variant. You're not making any Apple sales here, shill. Why don't you toddle off to alt.suicide.holiday?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 02:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mse5id$tg8$8@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #319043 |
On 9/5/2015 2:20 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/4/15, 11:36 PM, in article mse2h5$pbu$1@news.albasani.net, "Nobody" > <nobody@invalid.com> wrote: > >> On 9/3/2015 12:04 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:58:31 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-09-01, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> John Gohde wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:04:38 PM UTC-4, vallor wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:39:32 +0000, ronb wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:16:15 -0700, ubuntuking69 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:54:26 PM UTC+2, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/2015 12:55 PM, 7 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The public demands hundreds of Linux distros >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Idiot. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The public demands about 10 distros. >>>> >>>> [deletia] >>>> >>>>>>> And why naysayers would want to limit that freedom would not seem to >>>>>>> be rational -- or at the very least, ethical. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ??? >>>>>> >>>>>> The Public Wants Mint, NOT Arch Linux >>>>> >>>>> The public uses whatever they want, not what a dimbulb like you >>>>> declares >>>> >>>> I would expect the public at large to be able to handle Mint more >>>> than >>>> Arch but I don't think that really matters. We are not here to ban each >>>> other's choices. >>>> >>> The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros. >>> >>>> After years of being trolled by the Lemmings and the Fanboys, it is >>>> clear that none of us has any reason to panic. As long as we are able to >>>> continue using what we have chosen, it's all good. There's no impending >>>> doom or tragedy. We don't have to worry about our personal version of >>>> Atari going bust. Those days are gone for us. >>>> >>> Yep, it is just fine as a hobbyist/developer/geek OS with no general >>> desktop use of any significance. >>> >>> >>>> That is true of Linux in general as well as any particular variant. >> >> You're not making any Apple sales here, shill. Why don't you toddle >> off to alt.suicide.holiday? >> > > You are the one making Linux look bad and pushing people to the > alternatives. > > You are a great MS and Apple salesperson. Do they offer you commission? Prove your claims, Drew P. Bawls.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 15:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msfh19$be3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #319043 |
On 2015-09-05 3:20 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/4/15, 11:36 PM, in article mse2h5$pbu$1@news.albasani.net, "Nobody" > <nobody@invalid.com> wrote: > >> On 9/3/2015 12:04 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:58:31 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-09-01, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> John Gohde wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:04:38 PM UTC-4, vallor wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:39:32 +0000, ronb wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:16:15 -0700, ubuntuking69 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:54:26 PM UTC+2, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/2015 12:55 PM, 7 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The public demands hundreds of Linux distros >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Idiot. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The public demands about 10 distros. >>>> >>>> [deletia] >>>> >>>>>>> And why naysayers would want to limit that freedom would not seem to >>>>>>> be rational -- or at the very least, ethical. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ??? >>>>>> >>>>>> The Public Wants Mint, NOT Arch Linux >>>>> >>>>> The public uses whatever they want, not what a dimbulb like you >>>>> declares >>>> >>>> I would expect the public at large to be able to handle Mint more >>>> than >>>> Arch but I don't think that really matters. We are not here to ban each >>>> other's choices. >>>> >>> The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros. >>> >>>> After years of being trolled by the Lemmings and the Fanboys, it is >>>> clear that none of us has any reason to panic. As long as we are able to >>>> continue using what we have chosen, it's all good. There's no impending >>>> doom or tragedy. We don't have to worry about our personal version of >>>> Atari going bust. Those days are gone for us. >>>> >>> Yep, it is just fine as a hobbyist/developer/geek OS with no general >>> desktop use of any significance. >>> >>> >>>> That is true of Linux in general as well as any particular variant. >> >> You're not making any Apple sales here, shill. Why don't you toddle >> off to alt.suicide.holiday? >> > > You are the one making Linux look bad and pushing people to the > alternatives. > > You are a great MS and Apple salesperson. Do they offer you commission? I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my decision never to use Linux again. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 23:15 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20150905231511.5d49a24d@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #319166 |
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:51:54 -0400 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my decision > never to use Linux again. > > And you are famous for keeping your words ;))))))))
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 21:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <msfmmp$pr5$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #319193 |
On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 23:15:11 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:51:54 -0400 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > >> I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my decision >> never to use Linux again. >> >> > And you are famous for keeping your words ;)))))))) Unfortunately he hasn't been influential in getting SlimerAM to shut and leave COLA. -- Zero tolerance for LYING WinDrones & iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 19:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msfs4f$hhk$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #319197 |
On 2015-09-05 5:26 PM, ronb wrote: > On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 23:15:11 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > >> On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:51:54 -0400 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >> >>> I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my decision >>> never to use Linux again. >>> >>> >> And you are famous for keeping your words ;)))))))) > > Unfortunately he hasn't been influential in getting SlimerAM to shut and > leave COLA. I've already provided my terms: get every advocate to stop lying, I will leave. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-06 01:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <msfsie$lqu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #319207 |
A.M wrote: > On 2015-09-05 5:26 PM, ronb wrote: >> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 23:15:11 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:51:54 -0400 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my decision >>>> never to use Linux again. >>>> >>>> >>> And you are famous for keeping your words ;)))))))) >> >> Unfortunately he hasn't been influential in getting SlimerAM to shut and >> leave COLA. > > I've already provided my terms: get every advocate to stop lying, I will > leave. > The terms of a true imbecile. Because it is you who can declare every linux advocate a "liar", which will naturally keep you in the group And you are the worst liar besides Snit Michael Glasser ever to invade this group
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-06 01:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20150906011055.2200d962@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #319207 |
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:01:19 -0400 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-09-05 5:26 PM, ronb wrote: > > On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 23:15:11 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:51:54 -0400 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my > >>> decision never to use Linux again. > >>> > >>> > >> And you are famous for keeping your words ;)))))))) > > > > Unfortunately he hasn't been influential in getting SlimerAM to > > shut and leave COLA. > > I've already provided my terms: get every advocate to stop lying, I > will leave. > > Do you like this song? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaCNn05d2gY
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 19:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msfss8$mv6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #319212 |
On 2015-09-05 7:10 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:01:19 -0400 > "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-09-05 5:26 PM, ronb wrote: >>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 23:15:11 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:51:54 -0400 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my >>>>> decision never to use Linux again. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> And you are famous for keeping your words ;)))))))) >>> >>> Unfortunately he hasn't been influential in getting SlimerAM to >>> shut and leave COLA. >> >> I've already provided my terms: get every advocate to stop lying, I >> will leave. >> >> > Do you like this song? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaCNn05d2gY Um... -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 21:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msg3sd$aq7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #319207 |
On 9/5/2015 7:01 PM, A.M wrote: > On 2015-09-05 5:26 PM, ronb wrote: >> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 23:15:11 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:51:54 -0400 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my decision >>>> never to use Linux again. >>>> >>>> >>> And you are famous for keeping your words ;)))))))) >> >> Unfortunately he hasn't been influential in getting SlimerAM to shut and >> leave COLA. > > I've already provided my terms: get every advocate to stop lying, I will > leave. Then you'd better be prepared to stay for a lifetime, 'cause these dirtbags are not gonna stop lying.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 22:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msg6tc$dba$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #319232 |
On 2015-09-05 9:13 PM, DFS wrote: > On 9/5/2015 7:01 PM, A.M wrote: >> On 2015-09-05 5:26 PM, ronb wrote: >>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 23:15:11 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:51:54 -0400 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my decision >>>>> never to use Linux again. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> And you are famous for keeping your words ;)))))))) >>> >>> Unfortunately he hasn't been influential in getting SlimerAM to shut and >>> leave COLA. >> >> I've already provided my terms: get every advocate to stop lying, I will >> leave. > > > Then you'd better be prepared to stay for a lifetime, 'cause these > dirtbags are not gonna stop lying. That's exactly what I was figuring. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 18:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msfs07$hhk$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #319193 |
On 2015-09-05 5:15 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:51:54 -0400 > "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> >> I have to admit that Nobody has been very influential in my decision >> never to use Linux again. >> >> > And you are famous for keeping your words ;)))))))) :) It's not my fault that it is a very tumultuous time in the world of technological privacy. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-10 16:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmv3ssn.nnq.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #319043 |
On 2015-09-05, Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 9/3/2015 12:04 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:58:31 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-09-01, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> John Gohde wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:04:38 PM UTC-4, vallor wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:39:32 +0000, ronb wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:16:15 -0700, ubuntuking69 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:54:26 PM UTC+2, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/2015 12:55 PM, 7 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The public demands hundreds of Linux distros
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The public demands about 10 distros.
>>>
>>> [deletia]
[deletia]
>> The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros.
The same goes for MacOS despite a brand that predates WinDOS, very
competent marketing, plenty of unpaid shills in the news media, and
dedicated stores.
>>
>>> After years of being trolled by the Lemmings and the Fanboys, it is
>>> clear that none of us has any reason to panic. As long as we are able to
>>> continue using what we have chosen, it's all good. There's no impending
>>> doom or tragedy. We don't have to worry about our personal version of
>>> Atari going bust. Those days are gone for us.
>>>
>> Yep, it is just fine as a hobbyist/developer/geek OS with no general
>> desktop use of any significance.
The same goes for MacOS and they are supposed to "do everything right".
>>
>>
>>> That is true of Linux in general as well as any particular variant.
>
> You're not making any Apple sales here, shill. Why don't you toddle
> off to alt.suicide.holiday?
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-10 21:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5ebdpF1995U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #320012 |
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:18:15 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
> On 2015-09-05, Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 9/3/2015 12:04 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote:
>>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:58:31 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-09-01, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>> John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:04:38 PM UTC-4, vallor wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:39:32 +0000, ronb wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:16:15 -0700, ubuntuking69 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 9:54:26 PM UTC+2, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/2015 12:55 PM, 7 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The public demands hundreds of Linux distros
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The public demands about 10 distros.
>>>>
>>>> [deletia]
>
> [deletia]
>
>>> The public at large has rejected all Linux desktop distros.
>
> The same goes for MacOS despite a brand that predates WinDOS, very
> competent marketing, plenty of unpaid shills in the news media, and
> dedicated stores.
>
You keep singing that sour note, but it is just sour grapes.
Not only does OSX have a much bigger marketshare than Linux on the
desktop, it is on what you all call grossly overpriced hardware.
Meanwhile FREE Linux desktop is just what it was from day one. Hobbyist
and developer friendly and rejected by the rest of the market
resoundingly.
>
>>>> After years of being trolled by the Lemmings and the Fanboys, it
>>>> is
>>>> clear that none of us has any reason to panic. As long as we are able
>>>> to continue using what we have chosen, it's all good. There's no
>>>> impending doom or tragedy. We don't have to worry about our personal
>>>> version of Atari going bust. Those days are gone for us.
>>>>
>>> Yep, it is just fine as a hobbyist/developer/geek OS with no general
>>> desktop use of any significance.
>
> The same goes for MacOS and they are supposed to "do everything
> right".
>
Not in any way no matter how much you sing that sour note.
>
>>>
>>>> That is true of Linux in general as well as any particular
>>>> variant.
>>
>> You're not making any Apple sales here, shill. Why don't you toddle
>> off to alt.suicide.holiday?
>>
--
Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 09:42 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <msui51$kue$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #320016 |
On 09/10/2015 06:35 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: . . . > > Meanwhile FREE Linux desktop is just what it was from day one. Hobbyist > and developer friendly and rejected by the rest of the market > resoundingly. > . . . The last time I heard, FREEDOM Linux was everywhere: Super computers, servers of all kind, desktop, Android, embedded in numerous devices, on and on and on………. Anybody to think that it is a hobbyist platform must be out of touch with reality, living in a neanderthal cave in the Ozarks. Linux has won the race long time ago, this is the reality, like it or not. This is comp.os.linux.advocacy group, not comp.os.linux.desktop.advocacy. Many winTrolls and iCultits desperately hang on to the Linux at !.5% figure because this allows them a false victory and walkaway felling smug. The fact is the counters are sponsored by various groups for ulterior motives and to show themselves falsely in a better light. I will let you in on a secret, the counters are promised double bonus to show Linux desktop usage at around 1.5%. The accuracy of the counting methods are highly suspect. Will they allow impartial third parties to scrutinize their methods and data?. If it is not open for inspection then it can not be trusted. Using this data in an argument is not valid to say the least. For the ill-informed with their heads in the sand or living in a Ozark cave in the darkness, here is a 2010 list. A 2015 list will be many fold larger. http://www.comparebusinessproducts.com/fyi/50-places-linux-running-you-might-not-expect
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 12:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5g1ghFdeqjU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #320081 |
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:42:56 -0300, sbd wrote: > On 09/10/2015 06:35 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > . > . > . >> >> Meanwhile FREE Linux desktop is just what it was from day one. >> Hobbyist and developer friendly and rejected by the rest of the market >> resoundingly. >> > . > . > . > The last time I heard, FREEDOM Linux was everywhere: Super computers, > servers of all kind, desktop, Android, embedded in numerous devices, on > and on and on………. Anybody to think that it is a hobbyist platform must > be out of touch with reality, living in a neanderthal cave in the > Ozarks. Linux has won the race long time ago, this is the reality, like > it or not. > > This is comp.os.linux.advocacy group, not > comp.os.linux.desktop.advocacy. Many winTrolls and iCultits desperately > hang on to the Linux at !.5% figure because this allows them a false > victory and walkaway felling smug. The fact is the counters are > sponsored by various groups for ulterior motives and to show themselves > falsely in a better light. I will let you in on a secret, the counters > are promised double bonus to show Linux desktop usage at around 1.5%. > The accuracy of the counting methods are highly suspect. Will they > allow impartial third parties to scrutinize their methods and data?. If > it is not open for inspection then it can not be trusted. Using this > data in an argument is not valid to say the least. > > For the ill-informed with their heads in the sand or living in a Ozark > cave in the darkness, here is a 2010 list. A 2015 list will be many fold > larger. > > http://www.comparebusinessproducts.com/fyi/50-places-linux-running-you- might-not-expect While Linux has found success on servers, and on lots of devices that have hidden the fact that Linux is there at all. You know like embedded OS on devices, Android, ChromeOS and others, the fact is that on the desktop it has failed to find a market. And I think that if you actually read here often, you'll find that most would agree that Linux is excellent in those roles it has found success with. It is only on the desktop that Linux cannot and will not ever find more than a miniscule portion of the market. The reasons are simple. 1. Absolutely no compelling reason to switch to Linux on the desktop. It isn't easier, doesn't have the range of professional/consumer level software available for it are some of the biggest reasons. 2. The plethora of GUIs for it are anathema to wide acceptance. Most people don't want to fuck with the OS, they want to run the applications and have the OS get out of the way to do it. 3. The plethora of distros make it impossible to have a unified marketing message. I know you propeller heads don't think that's important, but it sales/marketing it is huge. And for all the technical reasons you might spout, in the end it is marketing/sales that makes the difference.. 4. The level of all too many FOSS apps is just sad. Many, maybe even most, never even getting to a 1.0 level but seemingly forever in a beta stage. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 14:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ObKdne0u5PDOq27InZ2dnUU7-emdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #320081 |
On 09/11/15 06:42, sbd wrote: > On 09/10/2015 06:35 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > . > . > . >> >> Meanwhile FREE Linux desktop is just what it was from day one. Hobbyist >> and developer friendly and rejected by the rest of the market >> resoundingly. >> > . > . > . > The last time I heard, FREEDOM Linux was everywhere: Super computers, Who gives a rats ass about super computers? No one around here could even afford them. The funny thing is that Cray realizes that Linus Torvalds screwed up and gives it away for free. So they took it and modified it to work on their super computers. But you still can't afford one, let alone afford the power to run one. So it's strawmans arguement to bring up super-computers. Stick to the desktop where linux fails to sell to the masses. > servers of all kind, desktop, Android, embedded in numerous devices, on > and on and on………. Anybody to think that it is a hobbyist platform must > be out of touch with reality, living in a neanderthal cave in the > Ozarks. Linux has won the race long time ago, this is the reality, like > it or not. > Guffaw!!! Linux is a geek/nerd paradise for them and no one else. Regular people don't have time to fiddle with linux. > This is comp.os.linux.advocacy group, not > comp.os.linux.desktop.advocacy. Many winTrolls and iCultits desperately > hang on to the Linux at !.5% figure because this allows them a false > victory and walkaway felling smug. The fact is the counters are > sponsored by various groups for ulterior motives and to show themselves > falsely in a better light. I will let you in on a secret, the counters > are promised double bonus to show Linux desktop usage at around 1.5%. > The accuracy of the counting methods are highly suspect. Will they allow > impartial third parties to scrutinize their methods and data?. If it is > not open for inspection then it can not be trusted. Using this data in > an argument is not valid to say the least. So provide and prove one product that utilizes embedded linux. > > For the ill-informed with their heads in the sand or living in a Ozark > cave in the darkness, here is a 2010 list. A 2015 list will be many fold > larger. > > http://www.comparebusinessproducts.com/fyi/50-places-linux-running-you-might-not-expect > > And for the government, I can safely say that linux was very much modified and secured for their needs, not the vanilla version. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 18:34 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <msvh9s$itf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #320145 |
On 09/11/2015 05:15 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 09/11/15 06:42, sbd wrote: >> On 09/10/2015 06:35 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> . >> . >> . >>> >>> Meanwhile FREE Linux desktop is just what it was from day one. Hobbyist >>> and developer friendly and rejected by the rest of the market >>> resoundingly. >>> >> . >> . >> . >> The last time I heard, FREEDOM Linux was everywhere: Super computers, > > Who gives a rats ass about super computers? No one around here could > even afford them. The funny thing is that Cray realizes that Linus > Torvalds screwed up and gives it away for free. So they took it and > modified it to work on their super computers. But you still can't > afford one, let alone afford the power to run one. So it's strawmans > arguement to bring up super-computers. > I have one in the basement. It is noisy but super. > Stick to the desktop where linux fails to sell to the masses. > >> servers of all kind, desktop, Android, embedded in numerous devices, on >> and on and on………. Anybody to think that it is a hobbyist platform must >> be out of touch with reality, living in a neanderthal cave in the >> Ozarks. Linux has won the race long time ago, this is the reality, like >> it or not. >> > > Guffaw!!! Linux is a geek/nerd paradise for them and no one else. > Regular people don't have time to fiddle with linux. > Guffaw!, Guffaw!, Guffaw! probably you have little time to fiddle with anything when you are busy clutching the bottle. >> This is comp.os.linux.advocacy group, not >> comp.os.linux.desktop.advocacy. Many winTrolls and iCultits desperately >> hang on to the Linux at !.5% figure because this allows them a false >> victory and walkaway felling smug. The fact is the counters are >> sponsored by various groups for ulterior motives and to show themselves >> falsely in a better light. I will let you in on a secret, the counters >> are promised double bonus to show Linux desktop usage at around 1.5%. >> The accuracy of the counting methods are highly suspect. Will they allow >> impartial third parties to scrutinize their methods and data?. If it is >> not open for inspection then it can not be trusted. Using this data in >> an argument is not valid to say the least. > > So provide and prove one product that utilizes embedded linux. > You got me there! but wait, I opened my router box and inside there was a multitude of miniature penguins running around. That is my proof. >> >> For the ill-informed with their heads in the sand or living in a Ozark >> cave in the darkness, here is a 2010 list. A 2015 list will be many fold >> larger. >> >> http://www.comparebusinessproducts.com/fyi/50-places-linux-running-you-might-not-expect >> >> >> > And for the government, I can safely say that linux was very much > modified and secured > for their needs, not the vanilla version. > > What! modified and secured, really?. If you have proof of this, take it to Stallman. He will take them to task. This is not allowed is it? Finally, just an observation, don't take it too personally. You argue like a mad dog with a pickled brain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 17:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msvhlq$jnj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #320150 |
sbd wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 09/11/2015 05:15 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> >> Regular people don't have time to fiddle with linux. They don't have time to fiddle with Windows, either. They plead with guys like us to help them. > Guffaw!, Guffaw!, Guffaw! probably you have little time to fiddle with > anything when you are busy clutching the bottle. > > <snip> > > Finally, just an observation, don't take it too personally. You argue > like a mad dog with a pickled brain. So why waste time with the addled bastard? -- Talkers are no good doers. -- William Shakespeare, "Henry VI"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web