Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #689608 > unrolled thread

Endeavour OS

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Endeavour OS CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 12:38 -0400
    Re: Endeavour OS RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 19:52 +0000
      Re: Endeavour OS CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 16:45 -0400
    Re: Endeavour OS Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:44 +0000
      Re: Endeavour OS CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 09:00 -0400
        Re: Endeavour OS Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 22:47 +0000
          Re: Endeavour OS CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 19:46 -0400
    Re: Endeavour OS Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 10:36 -0400
      Re: Endeavour OS chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-29 19:56 -0500
        Re: Endeavour OS CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 21:05 -0400
          Re: Endeavour OS Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-30 01:51 +0000
            Re: Endeavour OS chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-30 18:31 -0500
        Re: Endeavour OS Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-01 14:09 -0400
          Re: Endeavour OS rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-01 23:01 +0000
            Re: Endeavour OS Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 10:54 -0400
              Re: Endeavour OS rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 19:54 +0000
                Re: Endeavour OS chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-05-02 18:27 -0500
                  Re: Endeavour OS RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 23:41 +0000

#689608 — Endeavour OS

Just replaced Linux Mint with Endeavour OS on my work laptop. It runs on 
Wayland by default, it has support for Broadcom wireless chips from the 
live environment, it supports the Thrustmaster controller without 
modification, and it supports suspend and hibernation reliably. The best 
part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a woke 
distribution.

-- 
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
John 14:6

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#689621

On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> Just replaced Linux Mint with Endeavour OS on my work laptop. It runs on 
> Wayland by default, it has support for Broadcom wireless chips from the 
> live environment, it supports the Thrustmaster controller without 
> modification, and it supports suspend and hibernation reliably. The best 
> part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a woke 
> distribution.

It's hard to keep up with your changes, but choice is good.

-- 
Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin
with them. Know the difference.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689630

On 2025-04-28 15:52, RonB wrote:
> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> Just replaced Linux Mint with Endeavour OS on my work laptop. It runs on
>> Wayland by default, it has support for Broadcom wireless chips from the
>> live environment, it supports the Thrustmaster controller without
>> modification, and it supports suspend and hibernation reliably. The best
>> part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a woke
>> distribution.
> 
> It's hard to keep up with your changes, but choice is good.

I'm very principled when it comes to progressives. If there is reason to 
believe that they have any influence whatsoever over the technology I 
use, I am glad to be rid of it. I've used Apple and Microsoft's stuff 
and accepted this for way too long not to migrate whenever these clowns 
reveal themselves.

-- 
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
LibreOffice supporter
John 14:6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689646

On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:38:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

> The best part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a woke
> distribution.

You take wokeness advice from somebody who reads the Guardian?!???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689667

On 2025-04-28 22:44, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:38:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
> 
>> The best part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a woke
>> distribution.
> 
> You take wokeness advice from somebody who reads the Guardian?!???

It doesn't matter what he reads. He checked whether Endeavour had a code 
of conduct and a diversity statement. To both, the answer was no. That 
generally indicates that a distribution is intent on focusing on the 
work, not the identity of the contributors.

-- 
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
John 14:6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689713

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:00:12 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

> On 2025-04-28 22:44, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:38:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>> 
>>> The best part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a
>>> woke distribution.
>> 
>> You take wokeness advice from somebody who reads the Guardian?!???
> 
> It doesn't matter what he reads.

Oh but it did, in this case. He was so desperate to find some article that 
had something complimentary to say about Microsoft’s products, that he 
blundered into a left-leaning site.

What’s the term for someone who says one thing, but does another?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689718

On 2025-04-29 18:47, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:00:12 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
> 
>> On 2025-04-28 22:44, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:38:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>
>>>> The best part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a
>>>> woke distribution.
>>>
>>> You take wokeness advice from somebody who reads the Guardian?!???
>>
>> It doesn't matter what he reads.
> 
> Oh but it did, in this case. He was so desperate to find some article that
> had something complimentary to say about Microsoft’s products, that he
> blundered into a left-leaning site.
> 
> What’s the term for someone who says one thing, but does another?

Well, the information still served a purpose. I was able to pinpoint 
Endeavour as a distribution with no allegiance to the Church of Woke 
which allowed me to use KDE and Wayland. Regardless of DFS himself, his 
information proved to be invaluable to me.

-- 
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
LibreOffice supporter
John 14:6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689683

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>Just replaced Linux Mint with Endeavour OS on my work laptop. It runs on 
>Wayland by default, it has support for Broadcom wireless chips from the 
>live environment, it supports the Thrustmaster controller without 
>modification, and it supports suspend and hibernation reliably. The best 
>part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a woke 
>distribution.


Apologies for running him off COLA, but going by a non-woke list
sounds lame.  I know Mint to be a decent way to use Linux, though.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689724

Joel wrote:

>CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
>>Just replaced Linux Mint with Endeavour OS on my work laptop. It runs on 
>>Wayland by default, it has support for Broadcom wireless chips from the 
>>live environment, it supports the Thrustmaster controller without 
>>modification, and it supports suspend and hibernation reliably. The best 
>>part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a woke 
>>distribution.
>
>Apologies for running him off COLA, but going by a non-woke list
>sounds lame.  I know Mint to be a decent way to use Linux, though.

I was hoping that DumFSck had dropped dead.  What makes you say you
ran him off?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689726

On 2025-04-29 20:56, chrisv wrote:
> Joel wrote:
> 
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>
>>> Just replaced Linux Mint with Endeavour OS on my work laptop. It runs on
>>> Wayland by default, it has support for Broadcom wireless chips from the
>>> live environment, it supports the Thrustmaster controller without
>>> modification, and it supports suspend and hibernation reliably. The best
>>> part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a woke
>>> distribution.
>>
>> Apologies for running him off COLA, but going by a non-woke list
>> sounds lame.  I know Mint to be a decent way to use Linux, though.
> 
> I was hoping that DumFSck had dropped dead.  What makes you say you
> ran him off?

DFS probably just got fed up of this place. It happens so routinely that 
I doubt anyone can really take credit for "running him off." Otherwise, 
I could be credited for running off Peter Köhlmann. The more likely 
scenario is that he simply decided to spend more time with his family or 
that he died.

-- 
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
LibreOffice supporter
John 14:6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689730

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:05:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

> DFS probably just got fed up of this place. It happens so routinely that 
> I doubt anyone can really take credit for "running him off."

I’m sure the rot set in when he started reading the Guardian ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689772

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> CrudeSausage wrote:
>>
>> DFS probably just got fed up of this place. It happens so routinely that 
>> I doubt anyone can really take credit for "running him off."
>
> I’m sure the rot set in when he started reading the Guardian ...

DumFSck was a rotten, lying bastard from day one, in here.  That was
about twenty years ago.

-- 
"I have to wonder why Linux users refuse to pay reasonable amounts for
software they claim is great?  Is it a case of being cheap?  Broke?
Greedy? All 3? There's no other way to explain it."  -  DumFSck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689810

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>Joel wrote:
>>CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>
>>>Just replaced Linux Mint with Endeavour OS on my work laptop. It runs on 
>>>Wayland by default, it has support for Broadcom wireless chips from the 
>>>live environment, it supports the Thrustmaster controller without 
>>>modification, and it supports suspend and hibernation reliably. The best 
>>>part is that according to DFS's compiled list, it is not a woke 
>>>distribution.
>>
>>Apologies for running him off COLA, but going by a non-woke list
>>sounds lame.  I know Mint to be a decent way to use Linux, though.
>
>I was hoping that DumFSck had dropped dead.  What makes you say you
>ran him off?


He killfiled me right before he stopped posting, because I was talking
sexually about what would be major gay sex with a trans woman.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689823

On Thu, 01 May 2025 14:09:13 -0400, Joel wrote:

> He killfiled me right before he stopped posting, because I was talking
> sexually about what would be major gay sex with a trans woman.

I've thought about killfiling you for the same reason. For me it's mostly 
I don't give a shit, meaning I don't need to know and don't want to know. 
That goes for the hetero male assholes who feel it necessary to brag about 
last night's conquest. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689859

rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

>> He [DFS] killfiled me right before he stopped posting, because I was talking
>> sexually about what would be major gay sex with a trans woman.
>
>I've thought about killfiling you for the same reason. For me it's mostly 
>I don't give a shit, meaning I don't need to know and don't want to know. 
>That goes for the hetero male assholes who feel it necessary to brag about 
>last night's conquest. 


I'm only trying to use my public persona to promote trans rights, it's
not that I'm expecting other posters to be interested.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689869

On Fri, 02 May 2025 10:54:32 -0400, Joel wrote:

> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> 
>>> He [DFS] killfiled me right before he stopped posting, because I was
>>> talking sexually about what would be major gay sex with a trans woman.
>>
>>I've thought about killfiling you for the same reason. For me it's
>>mostly I don't give a shit, meaning I don't need to know and don't want
>>to know. That goes for the hetero male assholes who feel it necessary to
>>brag about last night's conquest.
> 
> 
> I'm only trying to use my public persona to promote trans rights, it's
> not that I'm expecting other posters to be interested.

Your choice, but I believe it's counterproductive. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689884

rbowman wrote:

>On Fri, 02 May 2025 10:54:32 -0400, Joel wrote:
>> 
>> I'm only trying to use my public persona to promote trans rights, it's
>> not that I'm expecting other posters to be interested.
>
>Your choice, but I believe it's counterproductive. 

Graphic descriptions of sex acts, we can live without.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689886

On 2025-05-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> rbowman wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 02 May 2025 10:54:32 -0400, Joel wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm only trying to use my public persona to promote trans rights, it's
>>> not that I'm expecting other posters to be interested.
>>
>>Your choice, but I believe it's counterproductive. 
>
> Graphic descriptions of sex acts, we can live without.

When and why did someone's sex life become fodder for public discussion? It 
seems to be the only "identity" some of the Woke have. (And it's not always 
the Woke who yammer on about it incessantly.) Basically I just want to say 
to them, "Grow up."

-- 
Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin
with them. Know the difference.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web