Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #448422 > unrolled thread

[Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse.

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 06:43 -0500
    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-19 07:09 -0500
      Another Hero Worship Thread from the PWNED loser (was: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse.) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-19 07:54 -0700
        [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-19 10:45 -0500
          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-19 08:49 -0700
          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 21:12 +0000
    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 21:10 +0000
      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 14:18 -0700
      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-21 13:30 -0400
        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-21 11:21 -0700
          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-21 19:47 +0000
            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 13:09 -0700
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 00:51 -0700
            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-21 21:37 +0000
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 21:59 -0700
            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 00:31 +0000
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 18:02 -0700
                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 08:58 -0700
                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 09:06 -0700
                    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 10:02 -0700
                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 11:11 -0700
                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 11:26 -0700
                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-23 14:11 -0500
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 19:33 -0700
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 22:13 -0700
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-23 03:14 -0700
                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 04:31 -0700
                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 06:43 -0700
                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 14:15 +0000
                    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 07:46 -0700
                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 14:51 +0000
                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 08:34 -0700
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 09:03 -0700
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 09:20 -0700
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 09:40 -0700
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 16:42 +0000
                                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 09:46 -0700
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 16:39 +0000
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 09:45 -0700
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 17:53 +0000
                                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 11:48 -0700
                                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 19:27 +0000
                                    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 12:48 -0700
                                    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-23 19:32 -0500
                                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 16:44 -0700
                    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-23 13:10 -0500
                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 17:19 +0000
                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-23 10:56 -0700
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 11:06 -0700
                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 11:45 -0700
                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-23 18:32 +0000
                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-23 14:49 -0500
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 11:52 -0700
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 12:06 -0700
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 12:19 -0700
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-23 18:59 +0000
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-23 19:00 +0000
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-23 19:12 -0500
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-23 23:17 +0000
                                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 16:43 -0700
                                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-23 21:09 -0500
                                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-24 01:11 +0000
                                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 18:51 -0700
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 16:17 -0700
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-04-24 10:53 +0100
                                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 02:57 -0700
                                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-24 08:17 -0500
                                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 07:32 -0500
                                    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 12:44 +0000
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-23 12:45 -0700
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 12:51 -0700
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 12:53 -0700
                                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 19:49 -0700
                                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 22:00 -0700
                                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 08:46 -0700
                                    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:09 -0700
                                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 09:43 -0700
                                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 10:05 -0700
                                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 10:54 -0700
                                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 11:34 -0700
                                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 15:10 -0700
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 21:23 +0000
                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 20:13 +0000
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-23 20:15 +0000
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 20:32 +0000
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 13:44 -0700
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 15:42 -0700
                              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-23 22:45 +0000
                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 11:50 -0700
                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 07:18 -0500
                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-24 18:00 -0500
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 23:41 +0000
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-25 11:33 -0500
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-25 07:14 -0500
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-23 07:37 -0400
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-23 05:53 -0700
                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 06:44 -0700
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 08:37 -0500
                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-24 08:54 -0700
                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:13 -0700
                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 11:44 -0500
                    Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-24 11:39 -0700
                      Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 14:03 -0500
                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 14:05 -0500
                        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-24 18:03 -0700
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 18:32 -0700
                          Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-25 07:05 -0500
                            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 05:29 -0700
            Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-23 03:19 -0700
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 12:24 +0000
                Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-23 06:34 -0700
                  Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-23 14:48 +0000
              Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 06:42 -0700
        Re: [Troll] Admit to your Photoshop lies, -highhorse. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 12:37 -0700

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

#449064

On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 10:54:19 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 4/24/18, 10:05 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 10:43:23 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> >> On 4/24/18, 9:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>> You have been begging for my attention for years...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> LOL! I've *had* your attention... for years. Who *doesn't* know this?
> >>>>
> >>>> What is sick is how this is the primary goal of your life: to get *my*
> >>>> attention.
> >>>
> >>> LOL!
> >>>
> >>> What is "sick" is that you actually believe that. So now you can explain how I,
> >>> a mere hobbyist at web development, have managed to outpace you when it
> >>> comes to web technologies if you are my "primary goal". This should be good.
> >>
> >> Again: your focus is on me.
> >
> > Like any child who is being spanked you assume that. My focus is on tech
> > until someone acts like a chid, at which point they are treated accordingly.
> > Even with Feeb, who can actually be more childish than you, at times, I
> > generally don't stray from tech until he's been a giant jackass.
> >
> >> It is not even about learning web
> >> technologies for the sake of doing so or getting work done, it is about
> >> doing something I cannot.
> >
> > My interest in learning web tech has nothing to do with you, Mr. Narcissist.
> 
> Read above where your entire focus is how you can do things I cannot. Do 
> not blame ME for what you do. And you focus on my web skills over and 
> over and over... when they are not even that good (they are OK for a 
> pretty limited type of site, that is it). I rarely if ever talk about my 
> web site development skills in COLA, but even from just the posts of 
> yours I have seen you bring it up over and over and over.
> 
> You are obsessed with what I can and cannot do. You care about what web 
> skills I have FAR more than I care. It is creepy and weird.
> 
> > Case in point, when I asked you why you don't use JS over AS it's based on
> > two things, neither of which have anything to do with your misplaced whining:
> >
> > 1 - You're already familiar with JS
> >
> > 2 - AS is verbose
> >
> > See, this is called reasoning and logic, not doing something you can't,
> > because I don't believe you can't. If you can stomach looking at AS then
> > you can certainly write the kind of stuff you're writing in it using JS.
> 
> I have done a little in JS but do not know it well.
> 
> > But I know you wanna play 'victim' so that's what we get...
> 
> BS. You are the one playing victim here as I note how you obsess over 
> me. Stop. Not all that is wrong in your life is my fault... in fact 
> NOTHING in your life is my fault.
> 
> Take some personal responsibility.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>



You're clueless! 

What do you get out of lying, Krystal 'Super Troll' Lynn? The content is a bunch of delusional Krystal 'Super Troll' Lynn-like crap. Only glue sniffing would lead to that. 

-- 
Curious how these posts are made? Email: frelwizzen@gmail.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448918

fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 2:49:23 PM UTC-4, a.m wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I guess some of the regulars were bored of the lack of conflict. Deep
>> down, they actually enjoy the Usenet disease from Pescott, Arizona.
>>
> 
> It's that dummy-ass Carroll and the Bird Brain that feed
> that pansy son-of-a-bitch.
> 

Not to worry, Fabtard-in-a-Box.  You'll get some too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SH1j1luFOw

> That weird-fuck Glasser is flooding alt.os.linux and comp.lang.c
> with his psycho-gibberish.  He deserves to be severely beaten
> with baseball bats but yet dummy-ass Carroll and the Bird Brain
> continue to stroke that piece of trash.
>
> I suggest that they purchase an inflatable doll and pretend
> to feed it and wipe its ass.  Maybe then they will lack their
> motivation to stroke these Usenet degenerates.
> 

The debian explanation for your condition:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UULFS0kf7_g

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448906

Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 2018-04-23, a.m <> wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> It is much like how Owl and others have repeatedly told me that PDF and 
>>>> image annotations are rare things. Really? In the '80s they might have 
>>>> been rare, but not now.
>>>> 
>>>
>>>Got some quotes to back up your trolling?
>>
>> Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>> considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 
> 
> Exactly.
> 

So was that your motivation in the "Where's the Advocacy?" thread?
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448907

On 2018-04-23, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>> On 2018-04-23, a.m <> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> It is much like how Owl and others have repeatedly told me that PDF and 
>>>>> image annotations are rare things. Really? In the '80s they might have 
>>>>> been rare, but not now.
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>Got some quotes to back up your trolling?
>>>
>>> Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>>> considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 
>> 
>> Exactly.
>> 
>
> So was that your motivation in the "Where's the Advocacy?" thread?
>  
Yes.

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448912

Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 2018-04-23, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> On 2018-04-23, a.m <> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It is much like how Owl and others have repeatedly told me that PDF and 
>>>>>> image annotations are rare things. Really? In the '80s they might have 
>>>>>> been rare, but not now.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>>Got some quotes to back up your trolling?
>>>>
>>>> Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>>>> considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 
>>> 
>>> Exactly.
>>> 
>>
>> So was that your motivation in the "Where's the Advocacy?" thread?
>>  
> Yes.
> 

Have to be careful not to break him though.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448914

On 4/23/18, 1:32 PM, owl wrote:
> Melzzzzz<Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>  wrote:
>> On 2018-04-23, owl<owl@rooftop.invalid>  wrote:
>>> Melzzzzz<Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>  wrote:
>>>> On 2018-04-23, a.m<>  wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC), owl<owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is much like how Owl and others have repeatedly told me that PDF and
>>>>>>> image annotations are rare things. Really? In the '80s they might have
>>>>>>> been rare, but not now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Got some quotes to back up your trolling?
>>>>>
>>>>> Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>>>>> considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again.
>>>>
>>>> Exactly.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So was that your motivation in the "Where's the Advocacy?" thread?
>>>
>> Yes.
>>
>
> Have to be careful not to break him though.
>
I keep hoping there will be advocacy... or at least a focus on tech. For 
a while, Owl, I helped you to get there. Wish you and others would go 
there without prodding.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448920

On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 1:32:02 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> > On 2018-04-23, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> >> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> >>> On 2018-04-23, a.m <> wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> It is much like how Owl and others have repeatedly told me that PDF and 
> >>>>>> image annotations are rare things. Really? In the '80s they might have 
> >>>>>> been rare, but not now.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Got some quotes to back up your trolling?
> >>>>
> >>>> Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
> >>>> considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 
> >>> 
> >>> Exactly.
> >>> 
> >>
> >> So was that your motivation in the "Where's the Advocacy?" thread?
> >>  
> > Yes.
> > 
> 
> Have to be careful not to break him though.



Being independent as it is, low-level programming will never go away but it'll never be popular. What did you expect from the lying imbecile? That William Poaster lamer has nothing to lose but time. He has nothing else, especially not a girlfriend. 

Dropping support for System76 is common sense. What were you betting on? 

Do you have a high school diploma? Bravo, Jonathan Rhodes, you are now living rent-free inside William Poaster's beady little brain. With no evidence at all, as is usual for William Poaster. 

--
Live on Kickstarter!!
http://www.5z8.info/hackwebcam_e9z2tw_friendster-of-sex
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448921

On 2018-04-23, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>> On 2018-04-23, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2018-04-23, a.m <> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It is much like how Owl and others have repeatedly told me that PDF and 
>>>>>>> image annotations are rare things. Really? In the '80s they might have 
>>>>>>> been rare, but not now.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Got some quotes to back up your trolling?
>>>>>
>>>>> Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>>>>> considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 
>>>> 
>>>> Exactly.
>>>> 
>>>
>>> So was that your motivation in the "Where's the Advocacy?" thread?
>>>  
>> Yes.
>> 
>
> Have to be careful not to break him though.
>
Break him? I am in a fog right now ;p

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448886

On 4/23/18, 11:10 AM, a.m wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC), owl<owl@rooftop.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>  wrote:
>>> On 4/23/18, 3:14 AM, -hh wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 8:31:27 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote:
>>>>> On 2018-04-21, owl<owl@rooftop.invalid>   wrote:
>>>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 1:30:21 PM UTC-4, a.m wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 21:10:44 -0000 (UTC), RonB
>>>>>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2018-04-18, chrisv<chrisv@nospam.invalid>   wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Admit to your Photoshop lies, and I'll try not to "snip, unread" your
>>>>>>>>>> posts so aggressively.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (Note that your response to this post will be snipped, unread,
>>>>>>>>>> following the detection of any lies.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Some undeniable lies that you used to attack decent, honest,
>>>>>>>>>> reasonable FOSS advocates are below:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We claimed that "the same capabilities can be accomplished for free".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We claimed that it "is a waste".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We "globally reject it for all possible consumers".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We have an "irrational hate" of it, which demonstrates an "unfortunate
>>>>>>>>>> close-mindedness".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good grief, is high horse back on his Photoshop bandwagon? It's a niche
>>>>>>>>> product. A whole OS shouldn't be judged on whether it will run a product
>>>>>>>>> that only about 1% of the people need.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have yet to come across a graphical problem which couldn't be
>>>>>>>> remedied by GIMP or a combination of GIMP and Paint.NET, both free.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Except that any tool that can manipulate down to individual pixels results in
>>>>>>> a "can be done", but that doesn't have bearing on just how slow&   painful
>>>>>>> or quick&   efficient that process takes.  As such, that's really where the
>>>>>>> product differentiation resides for products such as iPhoto, Lightroom, Photoshop
>>>>>>> &   Elements, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Case in point, broadly describe your workflow for a composition where you have
>>>>>>> a subject in the foreground that's properly exposed and a background that's +2EV
>>>>>>> overexposed and you want to effectively balance the presentation by decreasing
>>>>>>> the exposure of the background portion only, leaving the foreground unchanged.
>>>>>>> Then discuss just how long it takes you to do this sort of task with this workflow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> darktable and a mask.
>>>>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/ms9eRBE?autoplay=off
>>>>
>>>> Pretty much, although a mask in this context is pretty close to what Photoshop
>>>> implements via layers...they go back to the paradigms of stacked acetates and
>>>> similar 'tricks' of the darkroom.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> My point being (for the purposely obtuse, take your bows high horse) is that
>>>>> most people don't manipulate graphic files in complex ways and don't need
>>>>> Photoshop.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, the statements in the archives do not acknowledge any minority
>>>> or niche accommodation, but are along the lines of "NO ONE EVER NEEDS THIS".
>>>>
>>>> As such, you're just trying to rewrite history.
>>>>
>>>>> This is mainly done professionally in print shops or photo studios....
>>>>> If you're in the 1% who needs to do this and absolutely need to
>>>>> manipulate Photoshop files ...
>>>>
>>>> Nope.  Just take a look at the actual mechanics that are underneath the
>>>> automatic ("magic button" adjustments in consumer software today - even
>>>> the stuff on smartphones, such as on/off automatic HDR.
>>>>
>>>> Surprise, surprise!  You've been one of those "1% Pros" for years without realizing it.
>>>
>>> It is much like how Owl and others have repeatedly told me that PDF and
>>> image annotations are rare things. Really? In the '80s they might have
>>> been rare, but not now.
>>>
>>
>> Got some quotes to back up your trolling?
>
> Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
> considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again.

I note things about tech they do not like... such as actually getting 
desktop tasks done... and they hate it so they attack me.

Simple and predictable.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448967

a.m wrote:

>Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 

Who is "we all".  Certainly, not I...

-- 
"I am afraid the zealots and the total confusion regarding the GPL is
ham stringing progress."  -  "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#449063

On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:18:35 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>a.m wrote:
>
>>Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>>considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 
>
>Who is "we all".  Certainly, not I...

Yeah... hopefully, we can all encourage owl and the others to ignore
the cockroach.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#449070

a.m <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:18:35 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>>a.m wrote:
>>
>>>Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>>>considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 
>>
>>Who is "we all".  Certainly, not I...
> 
> Yeah... hopefully, we can all encourage owl and the others to ignore
> the cockroach.

Dude, every fucking time I plonk snit, you and half a dozen others
start up with him again, either directly or by taunting him in
posts that are totally unrelated to him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#449110

On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:41:26 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
wrote:

>a.m <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:18:35 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>a.m wrote:
>>>
>>>>Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>>>>considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 
>>>
>>>Who is "we all".  Certainly, not I...
>> 
>> Yeah... hopefully, we can all encourage owl and the others to ignore
>> the cockroach.
>
>Dude, every fucking time I plonk snit, you and half a dozen others
>start up with him again, either directly or by taunting him in
>posts that are totally unrelated to him.

In my case, I was out of Usenet for a bit and decided to come back. I
basically reinstalled the software and therefore didn't have him
filtered. I usually have him killfiled by the end of the day though
and seldom reply to him before he's blocked.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#449099

a.m wrote:

> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>>a.m wrote:
>>
>>>Man, this newsgroup has to be in dire straights if we're all
>>>considering talking to the Prescott Parasite again. 
>>
>>Who is "we all".  Certainly, not I...
>
>Yeah... hopefully, we can all encourage owl and the others to ignore
>the cockroach.

Owl's exchanges with it can be sometimes interesting.  Much more so
than making fun of its house, or whatever, for the umpteenth time.

-- 
"but when I noted JPG files could have EXIF data I was repeatedly told
I was wrong, lying, an idiot, etc. Funny stuff."  -  some thing, lying
shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448836

RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2018-04-21, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 1:30:21 PM UTC-4, a.m wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 21:10:44 -0000 (UTC), RonB
>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> >On 2018-04-18, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> >> Admit to your Photoshop lies, and I'll try not to "snip, unread" your
>>>> >> posts so aggressively.  
>>>> >>
>>>> >> (Note that your response to this post will be snipped, unread,
>>>> >> following the detection of any lies.)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Some undeniable lies that you used to attack decent, honest,
>>>> >> reasonable FOSS advocates are below:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We claimed that "the same capabilities can be accomplished for free".
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We claimed that it "is a waste".
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We "globally reject it for all possible consumers".
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We have an "irrational hate" of it, which demonstrates an "unfortunate
>>>> >> close-mindedness".
>>>> >
>>>> >Good grief, is high horse back on his Photoshop bandwagon? It's a niche 
>>>> >product. A whole OS shouldn't be judged on whether it will run a product 
>>>> >that only about 1% of the people need.  
>>>> 
>>>> I have yet to come across a graphical problem which couldn't be
>>>> remedied by GIMP or a combination of GIMP and Paint.NET, both free.
>>> 
>>> Except that any tool that can manipulate down to individual pixels results in 
>>> a "can be done", but that doesn't have bearing on just how slow & painful
>>> or quick & efficient that process takes.  As such, that's really where the 
>>> product differentiation resides for products such as iPhoto, Lightroom, Photoshop
>>> & Elements, etc.  
>>> 
>>> Case in point, broadly describe your workflow for a composition where you have 
>>> a subject in the foreground that's properly exposed and a background that's +2EV
>>> overexposed and you want to effectively balance the presentation by decreasing 
>>> the exposure of the background portion only, leaving the foreground unchanged.  
>>> Then discuss just how long it takes you to do this sort of task with this workflow.
>>> 
>>> -hh
>>
>> darktable and a mask.
>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/ms9eRBE?autoplay=off
>
> My point being (for the purposely obtuse, take your bows high horse) is that 
> most people don't manipulate graphic files in complex ways and don't need 
> Photoshop. This is mainly done professionally in print shops or photo 
> studios. If you're in the 1% who needs to do this and absolutely need to 
> manipulate Photoshop files then, by all means, buy a Mac and/or Windows 
> computer so you can use Photoshop. The other 99% of the computer users in 
> the world don't have to worry about it. It's stupid to use the "no Photoshop 
> for Linux" argument in an attempt to make people think they have to use the 
> inferior Mac or Windows OSes.
>
> Ditto (and even more so) with the other argument trolls love to use "Linux 
> doesn't run Autocad."

Linux does run Catia.

   https://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/products/dymola/linux/

> Both are expensive, niche products that most people don't need. 

Indeed.  Even MSO is that, to a certain extent.

> Figure it out. This is not rocket science. 

It ain't computer science, either.

-- 
Your heart is pure, and your mind clear, and your soul devout.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448839

On Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 8:31:27 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote:

> 
> My point being (for the purposely obtuse, take your bows high horse) is that 
> most people don't manipulate graphic files in complex ways and don't need 
> Photoshop. This is mainly done professionally in print shops or photo 
> studios.
>

Speak for your pathetic, stupid self, dimbulb.

Photoshop is NOT a professional imaging program.  It is designed
as a graphical crutch to accommodate pseudo-professionals, mostly
faggots, in the marketing arena.  I know plenty of "professional"
Photoshop users who couldn't distinguish a pixel from a pimple
nor their ass from a hole in the ground.

GNU/Linux, in contrast, is for SERIOUS pros only.  The GIMP
already far exceeds Photoshop in bit depth capability, and
other GNU/Linux imaging tools can address issues well beyond
the reach of Photoshop.

So go back to your Ubuntu/Mint and find the pretty "button"
to click to get your fave cartoon and don't waste bandwidth
with your idiotic and ineffective "advocacy."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448843

On 4/23/18, 5:53 AM, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 8:31:27 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote:
>
>> >
>> >  My point being (for the purposely obtuse, take your bows high horse) is that
>> >  most people don't manipulate graphic files in complex ways and don't need
>> >  Photoshop. This is mainly done professionally in print shops or photo
>> >  studios.
>> >
> Speak for your pathetic, stupid self, dimbulb.
>
> Photoshop is NOT a professional imaging program.

Maybe you do not know what it is?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#448974

RonB wrote:

>Ditto (and even more so) with the other argument trolls love to use "Linux 
>doesn't run Autocad."
>
>Both are expensive, niche products that most people don't need. 

You clearly have an "irrational hatred" of both of those softwares,
RonB!  You "globally reject" them, and think that they are "a waste"!

>Figure it out. This is not rocket science. 

-highhorse enjoys being an asshole.  He will not admit that we are
entirely reasonable.  He would rather lie, no matter how obvious it
is.

-- 
"Specifically, (advocates) whine about how Photoshop costs 600 and is
a waste, while claiming that the same capabilities can be accomplished
for free."  -  asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#449005

On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:37:49 AM UTC-4, chrisv wrote:
> RonB wrote:
> 
> > Ditto (and even more so) with the other argument trolls love
> > to use "Linux doesn't run Autocad."
> >
> >Both are expensive, niche products that most people don't need. 
> 
> You clearly have an "irrational hatred" of both of those softwares,
> RonB!  You "globally reject" them, and think that they are "a waste"!

Except that these attempts are merely trying to disregard every use case
as supposedly being an irrelevant niche case.   

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/rkl0gFREIrg/SOdQ83A8N_8J>

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/Q0056tohwr0/RV7VBhLrNDEJ>

Problem is that after all of these examples are rejected, there's no 
use cases or Apps left to use! 

> >Figure it out. This is not rocket science. 
> 
> -highhorse enjoys being an asshole.  He will not admit that we are
> entirely reasonable.  He would rather lie, no matter how obvious it
> is.

Claims don't create truths no matter how many times you try to 
convince yourself of them in your attempt to convince yourself 
that you're not a loser.  Case in point:

'"Photoshop in particular is the most grossly over-hyped and 
ridiculously expensive software ever created..."   -Homer 

I don't see where that has any accommodation for Pro's in that 
statement...do you?

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/uGN0bwpcFLg/-QddwB6fAAAJ> 

Nor any other exception (such as for 'Serious Amateurs') accommodations. 

Similarly, 

"Photoshop too expensive?  Ya think?  :-)" 
  - Chris Ahlstrom 

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/P32TWntCDtU/gekj8Uds9KAJ> 

No exceptions acknowledged here either.   

Plus guess who was conspicuously absent from the subthread that 
owl & I had on actually using masks/layers in an editing App
to selectively adjust an image's exposure zones?  Heaven forbid
if a 'BSEE' is trying to speak again outside of their area of 
claimed expertise, and is interrupting the adults.  


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#449014

On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:54:16 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:37:49 AM UTC-4, chrisv wrote:
> > RonB wrote:
> > 
> > > Ditto (and even more so) with the other argument trolls love
> > > to use "Linux doesn't run Autocad."
> > >
> > >Both are expensive, niche products that most people don't need. 
> > 
> > You clearly have an "irrational hatred" of both of those softwares,
> > RonB!  You "globally reject" them, and think that they are "a waste"!
> 
> Except that these attempts are merely trying to disregard every use case
> as supposedly being an irrelevant niche case.   

Are you saying that the Plonk King, Mr. 'Cut Em' Off At The Pass' employs 
a preemptive strategy even when he does choose to engage?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web