Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286560 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-29 13:24 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-03-29 15:50 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 413 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 13:24 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 15:41 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 13:59 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 16:00 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:09 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 16:10 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:19 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-29 16:16 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:20 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:35 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 11:09 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:59 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 16:04 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:18 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 16:23 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 12:38 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 17:02 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-29 13:08 -0400
Re: fucking firefox John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 13:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 03:48 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:04 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:15 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:20 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:30 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 11:07 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:04 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 01:21 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 12:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:39 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:37 +0000
Re: fucking firefox John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 07:30 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-30 11:21 +0100
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:39 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:06 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 17:09 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:17 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:16 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:31 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 19:47 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 14:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 13:35 -0500
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 13:57 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 20:56 -0400
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 22:22 +0100
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:59 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 20:02 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:53 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 05:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 10:59 +0100
The Apache Software Foundation Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 06:11 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 13:07 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:32 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:28 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:24 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 12:10 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 18:37 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 10:15 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 19:51 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:20 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:22 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:27 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:49 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 01:01 +0200
Re: fucking wintrolls ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 23:01 +0000
Re: fucking lintrolls GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:46 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:51 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:45 -0600
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-02 05:00 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:44 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:06 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:12 +0200
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:39 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:27 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:30 -0700
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:35 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:47 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 12:01 -0700
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-01 12:14 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 13:02 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 22:57 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-01 23:46 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:02 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-02 00:08 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:23 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:43 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:41 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-04 09:36 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 20:11 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 20:30 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 18:30 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:39 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:02 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:47 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-02 06:09 +0200
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-02 08:58 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:23 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 08:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-04 02:17 +0000
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 09:38 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:57 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:56 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:35 -0500
Re: fucking wintrolls ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 22:17 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:46 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:58 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:13 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:20 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-01 21:31 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:38 -0400
Ezekiel doesn't care, obviously. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 08:20 -0700
Re: Ezekiel doesn't care, obviously. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 12:01 -0400
Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 09:55 -0700
Re: Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 13:37 -0400
Re: Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 14:20 -0400
Re: Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 11:34 -0700
If you don't need more, than fine. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 19:25 -0700
Re: If you don't need more, than fine. Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-02 23:50 -0400
Re: If you don't need more, than fine. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:10 +0200
Re: If you don't need more, than fine. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 12:58 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:49 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 01:53 +0200
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 12:36 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:16 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:59 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:25 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 09:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 00:04 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:29 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:49 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:56 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 10:50 +0100
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 12:11 +0200
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 07:07 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 14:42 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:45 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:13 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-31 11:35 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:09 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:59 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:15 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:26 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:42 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 15:01 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:43 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 19:54 -0400
If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 06:16 -0700
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 13:47 -0500
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-04-02 20:14 +0000
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 17:57 -0400
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 18:21 -0400
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:48 -0700
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:14 -0400
Define "Good things". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Define "Good things". Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:15 -0500
Re: Define "Good things". Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-02 23:49 -0400
The House of Saud. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 07:55 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 12:07 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 18:40 +0000
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 14:52 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:40 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:56 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 20:31 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:03 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:43 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 07:38 -0700
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:42 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:13 +0200
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:14 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:13 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 13:49 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:39 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:15 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:33 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:35 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:50 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:28 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 06:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:28 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-03-30 23:26 +0000
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 08:05 -0400
Hooting owl Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 05:56 -0400
Re: Hooting owl William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 11:01 +0100
Re: Hooting owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:58 -0700
Re: Hooting owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:43 -0700
Re: Hooting owl GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:26 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:28 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:25 -0600
fucking owl Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 12:27 -0400
Re: fucking owl Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-29 12:32 -0400
Re: fucking owl GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 16:00 -0600
Fucking bowel Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-03-29 18:41 +0000
Re: fucking owl owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 18:54 +0000
Re: fucking owl GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:58 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 09:45 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 15:54 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:06 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:55 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 09:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:38 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:43 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 16:42 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:55 -0600
Re: fucking firefox taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-04-01 09:23 -0700
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:41 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:55 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:25 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:29 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:24 -0600
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:44 +0000
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 09:05 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:40 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:23 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:22 -0600
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-29 16:19 +0100
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:41 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:54 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:09 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:23 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:32 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:40 +0000
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 09:06 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:06 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:21 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:45 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:20 -0600
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 09:02 +0100
Irritable bowel chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 07:09 -0500
Re: Irritable bowel DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:25 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:18 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:16 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:53 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 03:47 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 08:23 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-30 16:06 +0100
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:15 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 09:43 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 16:57 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 12:13 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 19:24 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 12:35 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 12:44 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 19:54 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 13:06 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 20:29 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 13:59 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 00:55 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:15 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 01:38 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:54 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 02:25 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 22:53 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 03:12 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 22:56 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:06 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 19:46 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 14:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 20:15 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 11:42 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 20:54 +0200
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 14:03 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 14:22 -0500
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-30 15:37 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:50 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:51 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:49 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 20:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:50 +0200
"What's a Sea drive?" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 05:57 -0400
Re: "What's a Sea drive?" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:40 -0400
Re: "What's a Sea drive?" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 09:14 -0500
Re: "What's a Sea drive?" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 13:22 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:57 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:11 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 11:47 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:29 -0400
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:29 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-31 18:39 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:31 -0500
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 14:19 -0500
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 15:42 -0500
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 21:19 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 23:41 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:37 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 12:49 -0700
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-02 22:56 +0100
C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:40 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 09:40 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 06:04 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:07 +0200
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 12:16 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 07:11 -0500
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:35 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:35 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 07:57 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:21 +0200
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 09:42 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 16:03 +0200
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 10:16 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 10:16 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:35 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 10:20 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:34 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 22:29 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-04 09:33 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:49 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 09:10 -0500
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:31 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:00 -0500
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 12:24 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 12:36 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:30 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:30 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:29 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 15:01 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:25 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:28 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 22:29 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:28 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:01 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:27 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:55 -0700
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 17:21 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:06 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:02 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 07:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:19 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 09:36 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:27 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:51 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:26 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:25 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:03 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:35 -0400
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 06:49 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:22 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 14:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:24 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-03 09:39 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:03 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 17:40 -0700
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:45 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-31 09:33 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:11 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:19 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:42 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 13:18 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:43 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 20:30 +0200
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 22:36 +0100
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-31 23:51 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 00:18 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 19:52 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:27 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:23 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:10 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:30 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:30 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:41 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:49 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 19:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:35 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:40 -0600
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 22:33 +0100
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:39 +0000
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 12:04 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:34 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:50 -0700
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 08:33 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:15 -0700
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-30 15:31 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 16:23 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 23:36 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:44 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 15:26 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 22:06 +0200
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 15:19 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 23:02 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:49 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:52 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 11:39 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:16 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:46 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:47 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:50 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:07 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:37 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 09:03 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 12:56 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 19:50 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:21 -0400
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-01 22:45 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 20:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 12:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 10:08 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:50 -0600
Page 13 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 21 Next page →
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 10:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfbn75$k1e$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286677 |
On 3/30/2015 12:09 AM, ronb wrote: > It's Linux's "collective fault" that another application developer's > program doesn't work on their distribution even though you bypass the > version specifically modified for the distribution you're using? > > Logic is not your strong suit, is it? Just use the version of Firefox > you'll find in the repository for your distribution. A version of <app> 'specifically modified' for each Linux distro? Microsoft is doomed. > Non-problem solved. It's a problem, and it's not solved.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 11:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfbpqc$2hd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286722 |
"DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in message news:mfbn75$k1e$2@dont-email.me...
> On 3/30/2015 12:09 AM, ronb wrote:
>
>> It's Linux's "collective fault" that another application developer's
>> program doesn't work on their distribution even though you bypass the
>> version specifically modified for the distribution you're using?
>>
>> Logic is not your strong suit, is it? Just use the version of Firefox
>> you'll find in the repository for your distribution.
>
>
> A version of <app> 'specifically modified' for each Linux distro?
>
> Microsoft is doomed.
>
Not only is it 'specifically modified' - according to another post from
wRonG these apps also need to be 'specifically designed' for his distro.
"So you don't use the version of Firefox that is
specifically designed for your distribution ... because ...?"
Then "advocates" balk at the idea that <company> doesn't support Linux
because there's too many distros. What fragmentation... just "specifically
design and specifically modify" the application for each distro. Non-problem
solved!
(Fact is that wRonG is talking out his clueless ass. Our product is orders
of magnitude larger and more complicated than Firefox and we don't do
anything special for any distro. We only officially support Redhat and SuSE
since that's what every one of our customers uses. They don't use any distro
that doesn't have professional support backing the product. A major bank or
telecom isn't going to post to some distro-forum and hope they get a
solution to their problem.)
--
Oh right. The junk Apple has made in China with near slave labor, but with
their logo on it, is perfectly safe at all times. The after-market junk
made in China with near slave labor, without the Apple logo, is always "oh
so dangerous." What disingenuous bullshit. And spoken like a true
iCultist. Apple is trying to lock out after-market products because of
their greed. They simply want to make more money. Point, blank, period.
The RonB/wRonG idiot frothing over something he's too stupid to understand.
Sept 2013
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 15:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <e5CdnS969ZJfIITInZ2dnUU7-dednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286731 |
Ezekiel wrote: > > "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in message news:mfbn75$k1e$2@dont-email.me... >> On 3/30/2015 12:09 AM, ronb wrote: >> >>> It's Linux's "collective fault" that another application developer's >>> program doesn't work on their distribution even though you bypass the >>> version specifically modified for the distribution you're using? >>> >>> Logic is not your strong suit, is it? Just use the version of Firefox >>> you'll find in the repository for your distribution. >> >> >> A version of <app> 'specifically modified' for each Linux distro? >> >> Microsoft is doomed. >> > > Not only is it 'specifically modified' - according to another post from > wRonG these apps also need to be 'specifically designed' for his distro. > Which from him is a pant load. > > "So you don't use the version of Firefox that is > specifically designed for your distribution ... because ...?" > > > Then "advocates" balk at the idea that <company> doesn't support Linux > because there's too many distros. What fragmentation... just "specifically > design and specifically modify" the application for each distro. > Non-problem solved! > > (Fact is that wRonG is talking out his clueless ass. Our product is orders > of magnitude larger and more complicated than Firefox and we don't do > anything special for any distro. We only officially support Redhat and > SuSE since that's what every one of our customers uses. They don't use any > distro that doesn't have professional support backing the product. A major > bank or telecom isn't going to post to some distro-forum and hope they get > a solution to their problem.) > Yep. Since I have paid support for RedHat, they finally acknowledged that there is a problem with FireFox. When it'll get fixed is another issue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 15:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <e5CdnSx69ZLYIITInZ2dnUU7-dednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286677 |
ronb wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:41:08 +0000, owl wrote: > >> William Poaster you stupid motherfucker. Get out of my thread. >> Can you even read? The thread is titled "fucking firefox." >> And I bash linux for not having their shit together (collectively) >> so that I cannot, as I should be able to, just load a binary built for >> *linux* and my hardware and have it run. >> >> All this "distro-this, distro-that" is a bunch of *crap* that has no >> purpose. Oh I'm going to make gnome the default, and have this desktop >> wallpaper. Hey, it's a new distro. Better set up a repo and have my >> own package manager. > > It's Linux's "collective fault" that another application developer's > program doesn't work on their distribution even though you bypass the > version specifically modified for the distribution you're using? > > Logic is not your strong suit, is it? Just use the version of Firefox > you'll find in the repository for your distribution. > > Non-problem solved. > Stupid. I got my FireFox from RedHat to run on RedHat linux. And it does occasionally crash. I even filed a bug report to RedHat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 15:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <oc6dnZBjyJjI6YXInZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286614 |
William Poaster wrote: > It was reported that ronb posted: > >> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:24:15 +0000, owl wrote: >> >>> annoying recent behaviour since i installed a current build outside of >>> ushittu repo. >> >> So, let me get this straight. You went outside the Ubuntu repo, but >> Ubuntu is "ushittu" because the Firefox that you didn't get from Ubuntu >> doesn't work right? > > So the dumbass owl blames GNU/Linux, instead of Firefox coders. > The tosser. > > I'm using Firefox on this distro, without any problems. > Installed from the openSUSE mozilla repository. > >> Uhhh ... okay. Whatever, dude. >> > Uh-huh... but if the same shoe fits on your foot then it is always the os fault, like windows, when it is the develper of the app that screwed up. Pot-Kettle-black.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 03:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mfagvt$o8g$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286614 |
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:19:58 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
> It was reported that ronb posted:
>
>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:24:15 +0000, owl wrote:
>>
>>> annoying recent behaviour since i installed a current build outside of
>>> ushittu repo.
>>
>> So, let me get this straight. You went outside the Ubuntu repo, but
>> Ubuntu is "ushittu" because the Firefox that you didn't get from Ubuntu
>> doesn't work right?
>
> So the dumbass owl blames GNU/Linux, instead of Firefox coders.
> The tosser.
>
> I'm using Firefox on this distro, without any problems. Installed from
> the openSUSE mozilla repository.
>
>> Uhhh ... okay. Whatever, dude.
>>
Same here. The only place I can replicate owl's Firefox issue is on my
wife's Windows 7 computer.
--
When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
it'll be a vacuum cleaner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 08:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1o9n2l4qo7y6d.170c3ig0nlrl7$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #286673 |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:47:09 +0000 (UTC), ronb wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:19:58 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > >> It was reported that ronb posted: >> >>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:24:15 +0000, owl wrote: >>> >>>> annoying recent behaviour since i installed a current build outside of >>>> ushittu repo. >>> >>> So, let me get this straight. You went outside the Ubuntu repo, but >>> Ubuntu is "ushittu" because the Firefox that you didn't get from Ubuntu >>> doesn't work right? >> >> So the dumbass owl blames GNU/Linux, instead of Firefox coders. >> The tosser. >> >> I'm using Firefox on this distro, without any problems. Installed from >> the openSUSE mozilla repository. >> >>> Uhhh ... okay. Whatever, dude. >>> > > Same here. The only place I can replicate owl's Firefox issue is on my > wife's Windows 7 computer. It fails with Linuxmint 17.1 cinnamon version.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 16:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mfboon$sm2$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> |
| In reply to | #286673 |
On 30/03/2015 04:47, ronb wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:19:58 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > >> It was reported that ronb posted: >> >>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:24:15 +0000, owl wrote: >>> >>>> annoying recent behaviour since i installed a current build outside of >>>> ushittu repo. >>> >>> So, let me get this straight. You went outside the Ubuntu repo, but >>> Ubuntu is "ushittu" because the Firefox that you didn't get from Ubuntu >>> doesn't work right? >> >> So the dumbass owl blames GNU/Linux, instead of Firefox coders. >> The tosser. >> >> I'm using Firefox on this distro, without any problems. Installed from >> the openSUSE mozilla repository. >> >>> Uhhh ... okay. Whatever, dude. >>> > > Same here. The only place I can replicate owl's Firefox issue is on my > wife's Windows 7 computer. > Can't reproduce it on over a dozen Windows 7 machines I've tried it on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 15:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <e5CdnS169ZJ1IYTInZ2dnUU7-dednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286725 |
Desk Rabbit wrote: > On 30/03/2015 04:47, ronb wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:19:58 +0100, William Poaster wrote: >> >>> It was reported that ronb posted: >>> >>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:24:15 +0000, owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> annoying recent behaviour since i installed a current build outside of >>>>> ushittu repo. >>>> >>>> So, let me get this straight. You went outside the Ubuntu repo, but >>>> Ubuntu is "ushittu" because the Firefox that you didn't get from Ubuntu >>>> doesn't work right? >>> >>> So the dumbass owl blames GNU/Linux, instead of Firefox coders. >>> The tosser. >>> >>> I'm using Firefox on this distro, without any problems. Installed from >>> the openSUSE mozilla repository. >>> >>>> Uhhh ... okay. Whatever, dude. >>>> >> >> Same here. The only place I can replicate owl's Firefox issue is on my >> wife's Windows 7 computer. >> > > Can't reproduce it on over a dozen Windows 7 machines I've tried it on. I've never had FireFox crash on me on Win7. On RedHat it has crashed and I filed a bug report thru RedHat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 09:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13D79AA.493D5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286560 |
On 3/29/15, 6:24 AM, in article bbvh3e9.a3e3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... > ANyway, Not a word. How can anyone understand that? LOL! > every time I shut down firefox What the hell is firefox? LOL! Of course I and everyone else knows what it is. Just another fine example of you self-nuking. > with the "X marks the spot" > button, after about a minute i'll get this nag about firefox More about this "firefox" thing. LOL! > has "crashed" for some reason. No, you DUMBASSES Oh no. All caps. How can anyone read that? > it did not > crashed - i i? LOL! > shut it down. DAMN LINUX GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER! > :) > Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 16:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bbvhd93.3a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286622 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 3/29/15, 6:24 AM, in article bbvh3e9.a3e3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > ... >> ANyway, > Not a word. How can anyone understand that? LOL! >> every time I shut down firefox > What the hell is firefox? > LOL! > Of course I and everyone else knows what it is. > Just another fine example of you self-nuking. >> with the "X marks the spot" >> button, after about a minute i'll get this nag about firefox > More about this "firefox" thing. LOL! >> has "crashed" for some reason. No, you DUMBASSES > Oh no. All caps. How can anyone read that? >> it did not >> crashed - i > i? LOL! >> shut it down. DAMN LINUX GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER! >> :) >> > Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. > But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. You just can't help being an idiot, can you? owl@thinkpad:~$ which firefox /usr/bin/firefox owl@thinkpad:~$ which Firefox owl@thinkpad:~$
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 12:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13D9CFE.493E9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286624 |
On 3/29/15, 9:57 AM, in article bbvhd93.3a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 3/29/15, 6:24 AM, in article bbvh3e9.a3e3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> ... >>> ANyway, > >> Not a word. How can anyone understand that? LOL! > >>> every time I shut down firefox > >> What the hell is firefox? > >> LOL! > >> Of course I and everyone else knows what it is. > >> Just another fine example of you self-nuking. > >>> with the "X marks the spot" >>> button, after about a minute i'll get this nag about firefox > >> More about this "firefox" thing. LOL! > >>> has "crashed" for some reason. No, you DUMBASSES > >> Oh no. All caps. How can anyone read that? > >>> it did not >>> crashed - i > >> i? LOL! > >>> shut it down. DAMN LINUX GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER! >>> :) >>> >> Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. > >> But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. > > You just can't help being an idiot, can you? > owl@thinkpad:~$ which firefox > /usr/bin/firefox > owl@thinkpad:~$ which Firefox > owl@thinkpad:~$ > <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox> The URL says firefox. The name of the program is Firefox. On Linux the program file is called firefox On Windows the program file is called firefox.exe On OS X the program file is called Firefox.app So damned confusing! How can anyone deal with this? LOL! -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 19:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gheu0.xxa03@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286633 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 3/29/15, 9:57 AM, in article bbvhd93.3a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 3/29/15, 6:24 AM, in article bbvh3e9.a3e3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> ... >>>> ANyway, >> >>> Not a word. How can anyone understand that? LOL! >> >>>> every time I shut down firefox >> >>> What the hell is firefox? >> >>> LOL! >> >>> Of course I and everyone else knows what it is. >> >>> Just another fine example of you self-nuking. >> >>>> with the "X marks the spot" >>>> button, after about a minute i'll get this nag about firefox >> >>> More about this "firefox" thing. LOL! >> >>>> has "crashed" for some reason. No, you DUMBASSES >> >>> Oh no. All caps. How can anyone read that? >> >>>> it did not >>>> crashed - i >> >>> i? LOL! >> >>>> shut it down. DAMN LINUX GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER! >>>> :) >>>> >>> Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. >> >>> But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. >> >> You just can't help being an idiot, can you? >> owl@thinkpad:~$ which firefox >> /usr/bin/firefox >> owl@thinkpad:~$ which Firefox >> owl@thinkpad:~$ >> > <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox> > The URL says firefox. > The name of the program is Firefox. > On Linux the program file is called firefox > On Windows the program file is called firefox.exe > On OS X the program file is called Firefox.app > So damned confusing! How can anyone deal with this? > LOL! It's not confusing at all if you understand that spelling has consequences.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 12:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13DA22F.493ED%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286635 |
On 3/29/15, 12:24 PM, in article gheu0.xxa03@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. >>> >>>> But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. >>> >>> You just can't help being an idiot, can you? >>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which firefox >>> /usr/bin/firefox >>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which Firefox >>> owl@thinkpad:~$ >>> >> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox> > >> The URL says firefox. >> The name of the program is Firefox. >> On Linux the program file is called firefox >> On Windows the program file is called firefox.exe >> On OS X the program file is called Firefox.app > >> So damned confusing! How can anyone deal with this? > >> LOL! > > It's not confusing at all if you understand that spelling > has consequences. It is only a problem for computers which insist on case sensitivity, as YOU provided a great example for. For HUMANS it is not an issue at all (except when computers fail to account for how humans think). You cannot help but self-nuke on this topic over and over. Love it! -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 12:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <08f9e04e-7ccf-4668-9fdf-79cbccaedaed@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #286636 |
On Sunday, March 29, 2015 at 1:36:08 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 3/29/15, 12:24 PM, in article gheu0.xxa03@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >>>> Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. > >>> > >>>> But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. > >>> > >>> You just can't help being an idiot, can you? > >>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which firefox > >>> /usr/bin/firefox > >>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which Firefox > >>> owl@thinkpad:~$ > >>> > >> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox> > > > >> The URL says firefox. > >> The name of the program is Firefox. > >> On Linux the program file is called firefox > >> On Windows the program file is called firefox.exe > >> On OS X the program file is called Firefox.app > > > >> So damned confusing! How can anyone deal with this? > > > >> LOL! > > > > It's not confusing at all if you understand that spelling > > has consequences. > > It is only a problem for computers which insist on case sensitivity, as YOU > provided a great example for. > > For HUMANS it is not an issue at all (except when computers fail to account > for developers who don't think to address this issue for the end user). I fixed your post for accuracy ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 19:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gbh03fa.3p@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286636 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 3/29/15, 12:24 PM, in article gheu0.xxa03@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. >>>> >>>>> But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. >>>> >>>> You just can't help being an idiot, can you? >>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which firefox >>>> /usr/bin/firefox >>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which Firefox >>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ >>>> >>> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox> >> >>> The URL says firefox. >>> The name of the program is Firefox. >>> On Linux the program file is called firefox >>> On Windows the program file is called firefox.exe >>> On OS X the program file is called Firefox.app >> >>> So damned confusing! How can anyone deal with this? >> >>> LOL! >> >> It's not confusing at all if you understand that spelling >> has consequences. > It is only a problem for computers which insist on case sensitivity, as YOU > provided a great example for. (see below) > For HUMANS it is not an issue at all (except when computers fail to account > for how humans think). Tell it to Apple, who are running www.apple.com on top of a case-sensitive file system. Tell it to Microsoft, whose NTFS file system is fully case- sensitive. > You cannot help but self-nuke on this topic over and over. Love it! So we can add self-nuking to the long list of things you are clueless about.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 13:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13DA966.493F2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286638 |
On 3/29/15, 12:54 PM, in article gbh03fa.3p@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 3/29/15, 12:24 PM, in article gheu0.xxa03@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. >>>>> >>>>>> But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. >>>>> >>>>> You just can't help being an idiot, can you? >>>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which firefox >>>>> /usr/bin/firefox >>>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which Firefox >>>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ >>>>> >>>> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox> >>> >>>> The URL says firefox. >>>> The name of the program is Firefox. >>>> On Linux the program file is called firefox >>>> On Windows the program file is called firefox.exe >>>> On OS X the program file is called Firefox.app >>> >>>> So damned confusing! How can anyone deal with this? >>> >>>> LOL! >>> >>> It's not confusing at all if you understand that spelling >>> has consequences. > >> It is only a problem for computers which insist on case sensitivity, as YOU >> provided a great example for. > > (see below) > >> For HUMANS it is not an issue at all (except when computers fail to account >> for how humans think). > > Tell it to Apple, who are running www.apple.com on top of a case-sensitive > file system. As I said, I think Apple is wrong here. We already discussed this. Comes down to you rehashing stuff instead of just admitting you screwed up again. :) > Tell it to Microsoft, whose NTFS file system is fully case- > sensitive. It is... under Linux. Not Windows. MS is smart enough to put in the added work to make sure things are easier for users. Linux screws things up for the primary users of NTFS systems by not following the Windows standards, even as an easy to use option: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/NTFS_WIN_LINUX.mov> It is likely why Apple uses NTFS as read only. The case issues lead to problems. But with add-ons OS X works much like Linux... it gets things wrong for Windows users. >> You cannot help but self-nuke on this topic over and over. Love it! > > So we can add self-nuking to the long list of things you are clueless about. LOL! Come on... can't you see the humor in your screw ups? -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 20:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bvhdu0.f30@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286639 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 3/29/15, 12:54 PM, in article gbh03fa.3p@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 3/29/15, 12:24 PM, in article gheu0.xxa03@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. >>>>>> >>>>>>> But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. >>>>>> >>>>>> You just can't help being an idiot, can you? >>>>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which firefox >>>>>> /usr/bin/firefox >>>>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which Firefox >>>>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ >>>>>> >>>>> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox> >>>> >>>>> The URL says firefox. >>>>> The name of the program is Firefox. >>>>> On Linux the program file is called firefox >>>>> On Windows the program file is called firefox.exe >>>>> On OS X the program file is called Firefox.app >>>> >>>>> So damned confusing! How can anyone deal with this? >>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>> >>>> It's not confusing at all if you understand that spelling >>>> has consequences. >> >>> It is only a problem for computers which insist on case sensitivity, as YOU >>> provided a great example for. >> >> (see below) >> >>> For HUMANS it is not an issue at all (except when computers fail to account >>> for how humans think). >> >> Tell it to Apple, who are running www.apple.com on top of a case-sensitive >> file system. > As I said, I think Apple is wrong here. We already discussed this. Comes > down to you rehashing stuff instead of just admitting you screwed up again. > :) >> Tell it to Microsoft, whose NTFS file system is fully case- >> sensitive. > It is... under Linux. Not Windows. MS is smart enough to put in the added > work to make sure things are easier for users. No. NTFS is fully case-sensitive period. It is the way in which some Windows subsystems choose to interface with it that makes it appear to be merely case-preserving. As you can see in one of my other posts, installing the services for unix you can open a unix shell under Win 2008 server and have full case-sensitive behavior. This *is* running under Windows when it does that. It requires flipping a registry bit to enable default case-senistive behavior however. But this makes no change whatsoever to the NTFS volume, which is fully case sensitive from the start. > Linux screws things up for the primary users of NTFS systems by not > following the Windows standards, even as an easy to use option: Linux is following the NTFS standard. And since Linux is not Windows, it does not have to play by Windows rules when it interfaces with NTFS. > <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/NTFS_WIN_LINUX.mov> Put it on youtube. I don't visit hostile sites. > It is likely why Apple uses NTFS as read only. The case issues lead to > problems. But with add-ons OS X works much like Linux... it gets things > wrong for Windows users. It is Windows users that are not taking full advantage of the capabilies of NTFS. >>> You cannot help but self-nuke on this topic over and over. Love it! >> >> So we can add self-nuking to the long list of things you are clueless about. > LOL! Come on... can't you see the humor in your screw ups? Sure. But what does that have to do with this thread?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 13:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13DB5BB.493F7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286640 |
On 3/29/15, 1:29 PM, in article bvhdu0.f30@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 3/29/15, 12:54 PM, in article gbh03fa.3p@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/29/15, 12:24 PM, in article gheu0.xxa03@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> Owl... you are really good at making a fool of yourself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But, yes, Firefox is garbage these days. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You just can't help being an idiot, can you? >>>>>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which firefox >>>>>>> /usr/bin/firefox >>>>>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ which Firefox >>>>>>> owl@thinkpad:~$ >>>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox> >>>>> >>>>>> The URL says firefox. >>>>>> The name of the program is Firefox. >>>>>> On Linux the program file is called firefox >>>>>> On Windows the program file is called firefox.exe >>>>>> On OS X the program file is called Firefox.app >>>>> >>>>>> So damned confusing! How can anyone deal with this? >>>>> >>>>>> LOL! >>>>> >>>>> It's not confusing at all if you understand that spelling >>>>> has consequences. >>> >>>> It is only a problem for computers which insist on case sensitivity, as YOU >>>> provided a great example for. >>> >>> (see below) >>> >>>> For HUMANS it is not an issue at all (except when computers fail to account >>>> for how humans think). >>> >>> Tell it to Apple, who are running www.apple.com on top of a case-sensitive >>> file system. > >> As I said, I think Apple is wrong here. We already discussed this. Comes >> down to you rehashing stuff instead of just admitting you screwed up again. >> :) > >>> Tell it to Microsoft, whose NTFS file system is fully case- >>> sensitive. > >> It is... under Linux. Not Windows. MS is smart enough to put in the added >> work to make sure things are easier for users. > > No. NTFS is fully case-sensitive period. And yet Windows treats it as case preserving but not case sensitive. MS goes out of their way to make things better for users. Linux does not have this, even as an option. > It is the way in which some Windows subsystems choose to interface with it > that makes it appear to be merely case-preserving. As you can see in one of > my other posts, installing the services for unix you can open a unix shell > under Win 2008 server and have full case-sensitive behavior. This *is* > running under Windows when it does that. It requires flipping a registry bit > to enable default case-senistive behavior however. But this makes no change > whatsoever to the NTFS volume, which is fully case sensitive from the start. > >> Linux screws things up for the primary users of NTFS systems by not >> following the Windows standards, even as an easy to use option: > > Linux is following the NTFS standard. And since Linux is not > Windows, it does not have to play by Windows rules when it interfaces > with NTFS. That is like saying you will go by an official French book when you visit Paris and insist the people in Paris are wrong when they use their own vernacular. >> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/NTFS_WIN_LINUX.mov> > > Put it on youtube. I don't visit hostile sites. You can fear it as much as you want. Use HideMyAss or whatever if you want. I do not care. But it proves my point very well. >> It is likely why Apple uses NTFS as read only. The case issues lead to >> problems. But with add-ons OS X works much like Linux... it gets things >> wrong for Windows users. > > It is Windows users that are not taking full advantage of the capabilies > of NTFS. It is Windows that goes out of its way to serve users better. Not even an option on Linux. >>>> You cannot help but self-nuke on this topic over and over. Love it! >>> >>> So we can add self-nuking to the long list of things you are clueless about. > >> LOL! Come on... can't you see the humor in your screw ups? > > Sure. But what does that have to do with this thread? LOL! You will not even admit to it. That might be the funniest part of all. :) -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 00:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <xcjd3.4a5@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286644 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 3/29/15, 1:29 PM, in article bvhdu0.f30@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> ... >>> Linux screws things up for the primary users of NTFS systems by not >>> following the Windows standards, even as an easy to use option: >> >> Linux is following the NTFS standard. And since Linux is not >> Windows, it does not have to play by Windows rules when it interfaces >> with NTFS. > That is like saying you will go by an official French book when you visit > Paris and insist the people in Paris are wrong when they use their own > vernacular. No, it's like going to paris and insisting that they use verbs instead of some mishmash of spoken language and charades.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web