Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #285562 > unrolled thread

Is Mozilla malware?

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Is Mozilla malware? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-03-21 19:56 +0000
    Re: Is Mozilla malware? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-21 21:58 +0000
      Re: Is Mozilla malware? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-21 23:33 +0100
        Re: Is Mozilla malware? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-21 22:41 +0000
          Re: Is Mozilla malware? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-21 23:52 +0100
          Re: Is Mozilla malware? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-03-21 23:08 +0000
            Re: Is Mozilla malware? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-21 23:26 +0000
            Re: Is Mozilla malware? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-03-22 00:46 +0000
              Re: Is Mozilla malware? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-22 11:29 -0400
                Re: Is Mozilla malware? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-22 12:00 -0400
                  Re: Is Mozilla malware? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-22 12:40 -0400
                Re: Is Mozilla malware? The Real Doctor <ian.groups@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-23 10:05 +0000
                  7 is too fucking fucked up to figure out the simple things in life. :( John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-23 05:12 -0700
                  Re: Is Mozilla malware? Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2015-03-23 14:39 +0000
                  Re: Is Mozilla malware? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-23 11:05 -0400
    Re: Is Mozilla malware? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-21 18:25 -0400
    Re: Is Mozilla malware? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-21 23:50 +0100
      Re: Is Mozilla malware? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-21 23:23 +0000
        Re: Is Mozilla malware? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-22 00:26 +0100
      Re: Is Mozilla malware? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-03-22 00:32 +0000
        Re: Is Mozilla malware? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-22 01:48 +0100
          Re: Is Mozilla malware? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-03-22 00:52 +0000
            Re: Is Mozilla malware? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-22 02:03 +0100
              Re: Is Mozilla malware? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-22 08:59 -0400
              Re: Is Mozilla malware? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-03-22 16:56 +0000
                Re: Is Mozilla malware? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 10:09 -0700
    the Linux distros where the Chromium browser does NOT work accordingly suck the big one. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 06:13 -0700
      Re: the Linux distros where the Chromium browser does NOT work accordingly suck the big one. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-22 17:51 +0100
        Lookie ... Melzzzzz is delusional John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 10:13 -0700
          Re: Lookie ... Melzzzzz is delusional Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-22 18:27 +0100
        Re: the Linux distros where the Chromium browser does NOT work accordingly suck the big one. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 18:06 +0000
          Re: the Linux distros where the Chromium browser does NOT work accordingly suck the big one. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-22 19:19 +0100
            What a weirdo Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-22 14:56 -0400
              Re: What a weirdo Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-22 20:03 +0100
                Re: What a weirdo Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-22 15:37 -0400
              Re: What a weirdo Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-22 17:21 -0400
                Re: What a weirdo vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-23 15:17 -0700
                  Re: What a weirdo Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-23 20:04 -0400
                    Re: What a weirdo chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-24 07:22 -0500
                      Re: What a weirdo Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-24 08:28 -0400
                        Re: What a weirdo GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-24 12:19 -0600
                      Re: What a weirdo owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-25 01:25 +0000
                    Re: What a weirdo DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-24 09:19 -0400
                      Re: What a weirdo Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-24 10:29 -0400
                      Re: What a weirdo "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-24 11:27 -0400
                    Re: Chris Ahlstrom lives in my asscrack Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-24 10:13 -0400
                  Re: What a weirdo GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-23 18:33 -0600
          Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 15:27 -0700
            Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-03-22 18:27 -0700
              Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-23 02:36 +0000
                Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-22 22:50 -0400
                  Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 21:03 -0700
                Gohde's Moi is a Usenet malware taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-03-23 01:42 -0700
                Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-23 11:02 -0400
                  Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-23 14:00 -0600
                    Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-24 10:06 -0400
                      Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-24 12:17 -0600
                Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :) GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-23 13:58 -0600

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#285854 — Re: What a weirdo

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>They are k00ks.  They're infiltrating everywhere these days, like
>>>roaches.
>>
>> No one who matters cares what the puerile whack-job asshole liars
>> claim to think.
>>
>> --
>> "How many boxes of Kleenex did you use last year wiping pee-pees?"  -
>> some piece of shit that calls itself "GreyCloud"
> 
> Well, at least in his case we can lay the blame to senility.
> 

Then move into a retirement home, old boy.

Guffaw!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285900 — Re: What a weirdo

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>> vallor wrote:
>>
>>> Donald Miller wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> <garbage snipped>
>>>
>>> Hi Flatty,
>>>
>>> If those are the only choices you can come up with, then my condolences
>>> for your decided lack of imagination.
>>>
>>> Because you fail to apprehend that, perhaps, he just doesn't give a
>>> rat's shit what someone like you thinks.
>>
>>Of course I don't care about his mischaracterisations of my humorous quips,
>>his gripes about my Subject-modifications, his frequent Usenet "stalking",
>>and his and his goofy pals' seeding of Google with nasty posts about me.
>>
>>It's all water off my back; most of the time I don't even see it.  I have no
>>idea what they think they accomplish.  They're wasting their time (and
>>yours).
>>
>>They are k00ks.  They're infiltrating everywhere these days, like roaches.

> No one who matters cares what the puerile whack-job asshole liars
> claim to think.

I see turdv has a thesaurus too.
That reminds me of this book I read recently on the Crusades written by
some brittard historian.  Used the words "parlous" and "apace" at least
five times each in a 700-odd-page book.  Along with at least a hundred
other words I had to look up that nobody uses.  No shit -- words so obscure
that I had to keep three different dictionaries handy, and yet *still*
some of the words were not to be found, meaning I had to get up out of
my reading chair and trudge over to a computer just to find the definition,
all because this fucktard wanted to come off as an intellectual.  God
I hate people like that.  Good book though.  :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285781 — Re: What a weirdo

On 3/23/2015 8:04 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Of course I don't care about his mischaracterisations of my humorous quips,
> his gripes about my Subject-modifications, his frequent Usenet "stalking",
> and his and his goofy pals' seeding of Google with nasty posts about me.
>
> It's all water off my back; most of the time I don't even see it.  I have no
> idea what they think they accomplish.  They're wasting their time (and
> yours).


You don't care, huh?

So why did you quit giggling and saying tee-hee?

Why did you quit with the stories about being pussy-whipped at home?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285797 — Re: What a weirdo

On 2015-03-24 9:19 AM, DFS wrote:
> On 3/23/2015 8:04 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Of course I don't care about his mischaracterisations of my humorous
>> quips,
>> his gripes about my Subject-modifications, his frequent Usenet
>> "stalking",
>> and his and his goofy pals' seeding of Google with nasty posts about me.
>>
>> It's all water off my back; most of the time I don't even see it.  I
>> have no
>> idea what they think they accomplish.  They're wasting their time (and
>> yours).
>
>
> You don't care, huh?
>
> So why did you quit giggling and saying tee-hee?
>
> Why did you quit with the stories about being pussy-whipped at home?

Man, I'd love to see examples of that giggling and "tee-hee" in his 
posts. I'd put them in my signature as a permanent reminder of how manly 
our friend AssStorm is.

-- 
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285814 — Re: What a weirdo

"DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in message news:mero83$2g1$1@dont-email.me...
> On 3/23/2015 8:04 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Of course I don't care about his mischaracterisations of my humorous 
>> quips,
>> his gripes about my Subject-modifications, his frequent Usenet 
>> "stalking",
>> and his and his goofy pals' seeding of Google with nasty posts about me.
>>
>> It's all water off my back; most of the time I don't even see it.  I have 
>> no
>> idea what they think they accomplish.  They're wasting their time (and
>> yours).

"humorous quips" - Humorous to who, a 5 year old?

Do grown ups think that wiping a pee-pee is humorous?  Nothing is as funny 
as a "billy box" or "billy butt crust" to a 5 year old.  Grown men don't 
consider someone who imagines a laptop "exposing itself" on a television 
commercial as funny. It's actually very weird and perverse that some 
giggling fool who's on an allowance from his wife imagines laptops are 
"exposing themself" to him.

What is funny is that a grown man would be wussified enough to be treated 
like a small child by his wife. If you don't behave, does she withhold your 
allowance little beaver?


> You don't care, huh?
>
> So why did you quit giggling and saying tee-hee?
>
> Why did you quit with the stories about being pussy-whipped at home?
>

He doesn't care as evidenced by the all the posts he makes where he says he 
doesn't care. Much like he "doesn't care" about Microsoft and its products.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285788 — Re: Chris Ahlstrom lives in my asscrack

On 2015-03-23 8:04 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 03/22/2015 02:21 PM, Donald Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> <garbage snipped>
>>
>> Hi Flatty,
>>
>> If those are the only choices you can come up with, then my condolences
>> for your decided lack of imagination.
>>
>> Because you fail to apprehend that, perhaps, he just doesn't give a
>> rat's shit what someone like you thinks.
>
> Of course I don't care about his mischaracterisations of my humorous quips,
> his gripes about my Subject-modifications, his frequent Usenet "stalking",
> and his and his goofy pals' seeding of Google with nasty posts about me.
>
> It's all water off my back; most of the time I don't even see it.  I have no
> idea what they think they accomplish.  They're wasting their time (and
> yours).
>
> They are k00ks.  They're infiltrating everywhere these days, like roaches.

You mean the way you wase /our/ time by reminding us how everything 
looks like a penis?

-- 
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285756 — Re: What a weirdo

On 03/23/15 16:17, vallor wrote:
> On 03/22/2015 02:21 PM, Donald Miller wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 14:56:43 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
>> <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>  wrote:
>>
>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:06:16 +0000 (UTC)
>>>> ronb<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:51:16 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Accordingly, the Linux distros where the Chromium browser does NOT
>>>>>>> work accordingly suck the big one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which are those?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you accommodating this lying moron?
>>>>
>>>> I ask myself that, too ;(
>>>
>>> Don't ask, just shitcan 'im.
>>
>> I notice you just changed the subject line to "What a weirdo" which
>> seems interesting considering you have gone on record as making some
>> very strange statements usually revolving around the male anatomy and
>> potty humor.
>>
>> It seems to me that calling others weird is not something a person in
>> your precarious position would do unless of course you are an
>> attention seeker looking to stir the pot
>
> Hi Flatty,
>
> If those are the only choices you can come up with, then my condolences
> for your decided lack of imagination.
>
> Because you fail to apprehend that, perhaps, he just doesn't give a
> rat's shit what someone like you thinks.
>
Got proof that Donald Miller is flatty?


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285648 — Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-4, ronb wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:51:16 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote:
> 
> >> Accordingly, the Linux distros where the Chromium browser does NOT work
> >> accordingly suck the big one.
> > 
> > Which are those?
> 
> Why are you accommodating this lying moron?
> 
> -- 
> When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
>                            it'll be a vacuum cleaner


Gee, I spent the better part of the last 6-months of 2014 installing different Linux distros and Chromium failed to work in ALL of those distros, straight out of the box, except for Linux Mint.

Thank god Mint took the time to get it correct.

Hell, a lot of these distros did NOT even use FireFox straight out of the box.

Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

If these other distros finally CORRECTED their little problem, good! I don't really care. Nor, do I keep up with these lying Linux distros. All that I know is that when I reviewed them, Chromium refused to work.

Je suis Moi, posted from Mint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aufL76bXLAg
 ………
«⊙¿⊙»  Says that ronb is a few beers short of a six-pack. :)
_`·--·´_

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285666 — Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 7:27:29 AM UTC+9, John Gohde wrote:
> On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-4, ronb wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:51:16 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote:
> > 
> > >> Accordingly, the Linux distros where the Chromium browser does NOT work
> > >> accordingly suck the big one.
> > > 
> > > Which are those?
> > 
> > Why are you accommodating this lying moron?
> > 
> > -- 
> > When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
> >                            it'll be a vacuum cleaner
> 
> 
> Gee, I spent the better part of the last 6-months of 2014 installing different Linux distros and Chromium failed to work in ALL of those distros, straight out of the box, except for Linux Mint.
> 
> Thank god Mint took the time to get it correct.
> 
> Hell, a lot of these distros did NOT even use FireFox straight out of the box.
> 
> Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

If I did not introduce this old wanker the Mint, he would be still twerking with the Windoze XP...  His Moi cannot handle anything more than the simplest distro and anything more than a web browser in.

If you want to qualify for more than a dumb Peppermint Jack you got to challenge something else like e.g. the OpenWRT!

> If these other distros finally CORRECTED their little problem, good! I don't really care. Nor, do I keep up with these lying Linux distros. All that I know is that when I reviewed them, Chromium refused to work.
> 
> Je suis Moi, posted from Mint.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aufL76bXLAg
>  ………
> «⊙¿⊙»  Says that ronb is a few beers short of a six-pack. :)
> _`·--·´_

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285668 — Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:27:54 -0700, taka0038 wrote:

> If I did not introduce this old wanker the Mint, he would be still
> twerking with the Windoze XP...  His Moi cannot handle anything more
> than the simplest distro and anything more than a web browser in.

It's not me who has trouble installing Linux, it's the brain-dead 
WinDrones and iCultists (take a bow) who can't handle this extremely 
simple process. 

BTW, "taka," this "old wanker" has also used Puppy Linux, Slackware, 
CentOS, Vector Linux, Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Mandriva, Fedora, SUSE, 
openSUSE, CrunchBang, Knoppix ... and a whole lot more. Unlike the moron 
WinTrolls and iCultists, I was able to get every single one up and 
running. When you grow a brain you can attempt insulting your betters. 
Until then, just shut up and maybe your stupidity won't be so obvious. 

Adios, moron.

-- 
When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
                           it'll be a vacuum cleaner

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285670 — Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 02:36:56 +0000 (UTC), ronb wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:27:54 -0700, taka0038 wrote:
> 
>> If I did not introduce this old wanker the Mint, he would be still
>> twerking with the Windoze XP...  His Moi cannot handle anything more
>> than the simplest distro and anything more than a web browser in.
> 
> It's not me who has trouble installing Linux, it's the brain-dead 
> WinDrones and iCultists (take a bow) who can't handle this extremely 
> simple process. 

These days any idiot can install Linux as evidenced by you.
The real question, which is the one you avoid, is why on earth would
they want to stay with Linux?

> BTW, "taka," this "old wanker" has also used Puppy Linux, Slackware, 
> CentOS, Vector Linux, Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Mandriva, Fedora, SUSE, 
> openSUSE, CrunchBang, Knoppix ... and a whole lot more. Unlike the moron 
> WinTrolls and iCultists, I was able to get every single one up and 
> running. When you grow a brain you can attempt insulting your betters. 
> Until then, just shut up and maybe your stupidity won't be so obvious. 

Sure you were.
We believe you.
Really we do.

Linux advocates fall into two catagories, in general.
Those that lie profusely for Linux and will claim virtually anything
works for them despite Internet evidence to the contrary and those
who have very low levels of acceptance.

The former are simply liars.

For the latter, these are the people who are happily running their
high end video card at 640x480 and claiming it "works" with Linux.

So which one are you ronB?

 
> Adios, moron.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285672 — Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

Re: Is Mozilla malware?

Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)
----------

This is what Moi wrote.  Don't like it, THEN shove it up your Ass. :)

.What a joke?  What else would you expect from the freak called 7?

.I use FireFox, NOT Mozilla, in Linux.  7 must be suffering from early onset dementia?

.FireFox in Windows pretty much sucks.  FireFox has ALWAYS sucked at dealing with video.

.Recently, Youtube HTML5 player code that has worked for 3 years stopped working 100% for no good reason for at least one week.  That event of course really pissed Moi off, as well as wasted a lot of his time.

.Still to this day, FireFox does NOT use YoubTube's HTML5 player to play their videos whereas Chromium and other Chrome based browsers do.  That in my book makes Chromium better than FireFox, in many ways.

.Accordingly, the Linux distros where the Chromium browser does NOT work accordingly suck the big one.

.Je suis Moi, posted from Mint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aufL76bXLAg
. ………
.«⊙¿⊙»  Says that 7 is a few beers short of a six-pack. :)
._`·--·´_

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285675 — Gohde's Moi is a Usenet malware

On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 11:37:48 AM UTC+9, ronb wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:27:54 -0700, taka0038 wrote:
> 
> > If I did not introduce this old wanker the Mint, he would be still
> > twerking with the Windoze XP...  His Moi cannot handle anything more
> > than the simplest distro and anything more than a web browser in.
> 
> It's not me who has trouble installing Linux, it's the brain-dead 
> WinDrones and iCultists (take a bow) who can't handle this extremely 
> simple process. 
> 
> BTW, "taka," this "old wanker" has also used Puppy Linux, Slackware, 
> CentOS, Vector Linux, Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Mandriva, Fedora, SUSE, 
> openSUSE, CrunchBang, Knoppix ... and a whole lot more.

and failed them all except Mint, well done ...

"Je suis Moi" is a steroid addict ...

> Unlike the moron 
> WinTrolls and iCultists, I was able to get every single one up and 
> running. When you grow a brain you can attempt insulting your betters. 
> Until then, just shut up and maybe your stupidity won't be so obvious. 
> 
> Adios, moron.
> 
> -- 
> When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
>                            it'll be a vacuum cleaner

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285708 — Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

On 2015-03-22 10:36 PM, ronb wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:27:54 -0700, taka0038 wrote:
>
>> If I did not introduce this old wanker the Mint, he would be still
>> twerking with the Windoze XP...  His Moi cannot handle anything more
>> than the simplest distro and anything more than a web browser in.
>
> It's not me who has trouble installing Linux, it's the brain-dead
> WinDrones and iCultists (take a bow) who can't handle this extremely
> simple process.

Like Chris AssStorm and clitorisv?

> BTW, "taka," this "old wanker" has also used Puppy Linux, Slackware,
> CentOS, Vector Linux, Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Mandriva, Fedora, SUSE,
> openSUSE, CrunchBang, Knoppix ... and a whole lot more. Unlike the moron
> WinTrolls and iCultists, I was able to get every single one up and
> running. When you grow a brain you can attempt insulting your betters.
> Until then, just shut up and maybe your stupidity won't be so obvious.
>
> Adios, moron.

When did you become Spanish?

-- 
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285726 — Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

On 03/23/15 09:02, Slimer wrote:
> On 2015-03-22 10:36 PM, ronb wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:27:54 -0700, taka0038 wrote:
>>
>>> If I did not introduce this old wanker the Mint, he would be still
>>> twerking with the Windoze XP... His Moi cannot handle anything more
>>> than the simplest distro and anything more than a web browser in.
>>
>> It's not me who has trouble installing Linux, it's the brain-dead
>> WinDrones and iCultists (take a bow) who can't handle this extremely
>> simple process.
>
> Like Chris AssStorm and clitorisv?
>
>> BTW, "taka," this "old wanker" has also used Puppy Linux, Slackware,
>> CentOS, Vector Linux, Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Mandriva, Fedora, SUSE,
>> openSUSE, CrunchBang, Knoppix ... and a whole lot more. Unlike the moron
>> WinTrolls and iCultists, I was able to get every single one up and
>> running. When you grow a brain you can attempt insulting your betters.
>> Until then, just shut up and maybe your stupidity won't be so obvious.
>>
>> Adios, moron.
>
> When did you become Spanish?
>
These meatballs called advocates think so highly of their own blindness.

He's nothing more than a linturd.

Fighting BS, one turd at a time.


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285785 — Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

On 2015-03-23 4:00 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
> On 03/23/15 09:02, Slimer wrote:
>> On 2015-03-22 10:36 PM, ronb wrote:
>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:27:54 -0700, taka0038 wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I did not introduce this old wanker the Mint, he would be still
>>>> twerking with the Windoze XP... His Moi cannot handle anything more
>>>> than the simplest distro and anything more than a web browser in.
>>>
>>> It's not me who has trouble installing Linux, it's the brain-dead
>>> WinDrones and iCultists (take a bow) who can't handle this extremely
>>> simple process.
>>
>> Like Chris AssStorm and clitorisv?
>>
>>> BTW, "taka," this "old wanker" has also used Puppy Linux, Slackware,
>>> CentOS, Vector Linux, Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Mandriva, Fedora, SUSE,
>>> openSUSE, CrunchBang, Knoppix ... and a whole lot more. Unlike the moron
>>> WinTrolls and iCultists, I was able to get every single one up and
>>> running. When you grow a brain you can attempt insulting your betters.
>>> Until then, just shut up and maybe your stupidity won't be so obvious.
>>>
>>> Adios, moron.
>>
>> When did you become Spanish?
>>
> These meatballs called advocates think so highly of their own blindness.
>
> He's nothing more than a linturd.
>
> Fighting BS, one turd at a time.

This place would be so much better if the retarded Linux "advocates" 
left. They're good for a laugh every now and then but it eventually 
starts to demoralize you to know that such imbeciles live among you in 
society.

-- 
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285853 — Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

Slimer wrote:

> On 2015-03-23 4:00 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
>> On 03/23/15 09:02, Slimer wrote:
>>> On 2015-03-22 10:36 PM, ronb wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:27:54 -0700, taka0038 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If I did not introduce this old wanker the Mint, he would be still
>>>>> twerking with the Windoze XP... His Moi cannot handle anything more
>>>>> than the simplest distro and anything more than a web browser in.
>>>>
>>>> It's not me who has trouble installing Linux, it's the brain-dead
>>>> WinDrones and iCultists (take a bow) who can't handle this extremely
>>>> simple process.
>>>
>>> Like Chris AssStorm and clitorisv?
>>>
>>>> BTW, "taka," this "old wanker" has also used Puppy Linux, Slackware,
>>>> CentOS, Vector Linux, Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Mandriva, Fedora, SUSE,
>>>> openSUSE, CrunchBang, Knoppix ... and a whole lot more. Unlike the
>>>> moron WinTrolls and iCultists, I was able to get every single one up
>>>> and running. When you grow a brain you can attempt insulting your
>>>> betters. Until then, just shut up and maybe your stupidity won't be so
>>>> obvious.
>>>>
>>>> Adios, moron.
>>>
>>> When did you become Spanish?
>>>
>> These meatballs called advocates think so highly of their own blindness.
>>
>> He's nothing more than a linturd.
>>
>> Fighting BS, one turd at a time.
> 
> This place would be so much better if the retarded Linux "advocates"
> left. They're good for a laugh every now and then but it eventually
> starts to demoralize you to know that such imbeciles live among you in
> society.
> 
These are the people that get caught as kiddie-diddlers, running down the 
street in the middle of the night naked, or doing something really stupid.

And yet we have to laugh at their total stupidity.  No wonder the jails are 
full.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#285725 — Re: Fuck the delusional Linux punks. :)

On 03/22/15 20:36, ronb wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:27:54 -0700, taka0038 wrote:
>
>> If I did not introduce this old wanker the Mint, he would be still
>> twerking with the Windoze XP...  His Moi cannot handle anything more
>> than the simplest distro and anything more than a web browser in.
>
> It's not me who has trouble installing Linux, it's the brain-dead
> WinDrones and iCultists (take a bow) who can't handle this extremely
> simple process.
>
> BTW, "taka," this "old wanker" has also used Puppy Linux, Slackware,
> CentOS, Vector Linux, Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Mandriva, Fedora, SUSE,
> openSUSE, CrunchBang, Knoppix ... and a whole lot more. Unlike the moron
> WinTrolls and iCultists, I was able to get every single one up and
> running. When you grow a brain you can attempt insulting your betters.
> Until then, just shut up and maybe your stupidity won't be so obvious.
>
> Adios, moron.
>
What a bunch of drivel.  Do you call your Dentist a moron because he 
doesn't have time nor care about linux?

Your elitist like attitude really sucks green donkey dicks.


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web