Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #285967 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-25 19:01 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-03-26 18:49 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 207 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-25 19:01 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 15:51 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-25 15:03 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 17:15 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 22:01 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:53 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:11 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:54 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:01 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:21 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-26 11:56 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:13 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-25 23:54 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-25 16:01 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-25 16:37 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 17:27 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:56 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 17:15 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:09 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:18 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:24 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:30 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:58 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:02 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:19 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:15 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:55 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 17:00 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 17:32 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 22:43 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 21:56 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 23:09 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:23 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:31 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:36 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:39 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:02 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:12 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 23:22 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:36 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:15 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:04 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:04 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:08 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 23:14 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:30 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 23:35 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:40 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:20 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:10 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:24 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:25 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:10 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:27 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:38 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 04:30 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 09:02 -0400
Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-28 16:29 -0700
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:37 -0400
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-28 18:51 -0700
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-28 22:09 -0400
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 09:33 -0400
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 09:58 -0400
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 22:38 -0400
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 06:56 -0400
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 13:11 +0000
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 16:18 -0600
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 18:50 -0400
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:40 -0600
For Linux-hating trolls: bite a little harder, why don't you? (was Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-31 15:41 -0700
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-28 19:48 -0400
Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:24 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:10 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 13:22 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 09:28 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:12 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-26 12:07 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:30 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 23:09 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 20:43 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-26 19:18 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 22:29 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-26 19:16 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 19:11 -0700
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 10:55 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 11:52 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 13:06 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 14:20 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-28 19:21 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-28 17:11 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-28 17:22 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-28 11:15 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 14:15 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 14:13 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-26 19:14 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:58 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:12 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:50 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:18 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:10 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:23 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:15 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 05:57 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:13 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:13 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:40 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-25 19:25 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 20:42 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:16 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:16 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:09 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:19 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:25 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:07 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:15 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:14 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:18 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:14 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:11 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:17 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:27 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:12 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-26 12:00 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:10 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-26 09:24 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 06:10 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 11:40 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 09:09 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 14:41 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-26 12:06 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 20:12 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 14:44 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 22:07 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:54 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:09 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:19 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:08 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:08 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-25 19:22 -0700
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:58 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 08:41 -0700
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:25 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 19:17 -0700
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:01 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:19 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:32 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 04:30 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 21:35 -0700
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 10:53 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:59 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:34 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 09:29 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:06 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-26 21:42 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-27 13:53 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:06 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-26 08:58 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 09:07 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:05 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:59 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 06:03 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 06:00 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:04 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:52 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:32 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-25 23:26 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:00 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:19 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-26 09:14 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 14:38 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 08:57 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-26 11:14 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 16:35 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 11:08 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:04 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:49 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:03 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-27 08:20 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 09:24 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-27 13:51 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 12:55 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 10:49 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 11:33 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 13:59 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:27 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 10:09 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 13:59 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 13:58 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 10:05 -0400
Why quote @chrisv ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-03-26 19:27 -0700
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:13 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:13 +0000
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:20 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:35 +0100
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:49 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:22 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:22 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:26 -0500
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:21 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:17 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:22 -0600
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:59 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:32 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:16 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-25 23:32 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:47 -0400
Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 18:49 -0700
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 08:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13976CF.491D4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286138 |
On 3/25/15, 7:58 PM, in article mevsj9$rl1$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: > On 2015-03-25 10:22 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 3/25/15, 3:08 PM, in article mevbj9$3bv$2@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >> <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >> >>>>> You know your operating system sucks when even one of its most important >>>>> developers considers it to be unusable and adopts OS X instead. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Which is really hilarious if he cites "lack of backward compatibility and >>>> fragmentation" is his reasons. Because OSX is of all the OS the worst one >>>> in >>>> these regards. By a very long shot. Even windows is far better in these >>>> things. Not to mention linux, which is usually far better than windows in >>>> backwards compatibility >>> >>> I agree with you and lack of backward compatibility is one of the many >>> reasons I dislike anything Apple produces. >> >> Apple does just toss the old too quickly in my view. You point to this and >> slowness and I think both have validity. > > I like their elegance and the fact that they tend to make their > applications work very consistently, but the slowness is more than a > little distracting as is the fact that you need to always be on the > bleeding edge if you want to matter in Apple's eyes. My wife has an iMac that is 7 or 8 years old. It still runs the newest OS and the newest programs - though of course slower than my newer iMac. So while I agree they drop the old too quickly it is not like my wife is on the bleeding edge here. Even then, though, they have re-done iWork and other programs and toss the old... and then leave programs have complete. It is annoying. > Besides, their security is absolute shit. The fact they tend to be hacked quickly in the contests looking for such is a concern, but I have never had an issue or known anyone who has on a Mac. The only real users who have to be concerned deeply about security are those who use Windows and Android. >> Yes, I still prefer OS X as my primary system but I do not deny the >> weaknesses of the system or the ecosystem. Wish the "advocates" could learn >> that. > > If I had to choose between Linux (and its users) and OS X (and its > zealots), I'd gladly pick Apple. And I would move to Windows before ANY Linux distro. :) I actually thought Windows 7 was a pretty good OS, even if I did not like the window borders and much of the rest of the look. >>> Linux is only slightly better than OS X though: it's laughable how many >>> applications will simply cease to work correctly because you updated one of >>> the many packages it referred to. >> >> Heck, look at how it is suggested you update some of the most common distros >> - wipe and re-install. Even if you get all the old apps to work what a pain. >> Neither Windows or OS X suggest this. > > Windows is so adamant about making sure that you never have to reinstall > the operating system that they now provide you with features to wipe the > slate clean without actually needing to re-install the OS. You can even > wipe everything clean and conserve your personal documents if you wish. OS X has always been this way. I have re-installed my OS a couple of times through the years... but never had to worry about re-installing all my apps and my data. Hmmm, I did have to re-install some Adobe programs and a couple of drivers... but that was it. And I have over 500 programs in my Applications folder. Wow. Just checked that. Need to clean some out I am guessing. :) > Technically, Linux offers you the same if you were smart enough to put > /home on a separate partition, but default installs don't always install > things in that manner. Either way, Microsoft is doing a good job and > doesn't deserve to be lied about the way Linux "advocates" do. Windows XP was pretty good for its time and I liked Windows 7. Even 8 is pretty good but I never got used to the new UI. Seems they are backing off of it for Windows 10 and giving it away. Nothing wrong with them doing so - Linux and OS X are also free these days. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 17:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf1tf0$q03$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286235 |
On 2015-03-26 11:41 AM, Snit wrote: > On 3/25/15, 7:58 PM, in article mevsj9$rl1$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" > <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: > >> On 2015-03-25 10:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 3/25/15, 3:08 PM, in article mevbj9$3bv$2@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>> <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>> >>>>>> You know your operating system sucks when even one of its most important >>>>>> developers considers it to be unusable and adopts OS X instead. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Which is really hilarious if he cites "lack of backward compatibility and >>>>> fragmentation" is his reasons. Because OSX is of all the OS the worst one >>>>> in >>>>> these regards. By a very long shot. Even windows is far better in these >>>>> things. Not to mention linux, which is usually far better than windows in >>>>> backwards compatibility >>>> >>>> I agree with you and lack of backward compatibility is one of the many >>>> reasons I dislike anything Apple produces. >>> >>> Apple does just toss the old too quickly in my view. You point to this and >>> slowness and I think both have validity. >> >> I like their elegance and the fact that they tend to make their >> applications work very consistently, but the slowness is more than a >> little distracting as is the fact that you need to always be on the >> bleeding edge if you want to matter in Apple's eyes. > > My wife has an iMac that is 7 or 8 years old. It still runs the newest OS > and the newest programs - though of course slower than my newer iMac. > > So while I agree they drop the old too quickly it is not like my wife is on > the bleeding edge here. Even then, though, they have re-done iWork and other > programs and toss the old... and then leave programs have complete. It is > annoying. Until the last two versions of OS X came out (I believe it was the last two but it might just have been the last one), older iMacs like hers were essentially locked out of operating system upgrades. The fact that Apple allowed her to have the latest version is an anomaly, not the norm. >> Besides, their security is absolute shit. > > The fact they tend to be hacked quickly in the contests looking for such is > a concern, but I have never had an issue or known anyone who has on a Mac. > The only real users who have to be concerned deeply about security are those > who use Windows and Android. I can't argue with you there. Mac users live in their own world where concerns such as security completely slip their minds. They are essentially the embodiment of "ignorance is bliss." There are simultaneously so many things and nothing wrong with that. >>> Yes, I still prefer OS X as my primary system but I do not deny the >>> weaknesses of the system or the ecosystem. Wish the "advocates" could learn >>> that. >> >> If I had to choose between Linux (and its users) and OS X (and its >> zealots), I'd gladly pick Apple. > > And I would move to Windows before ANY Linux distro. :) > > I actually thought Windows 7 was a pretty good OS, even if I did not like > the window borders and much of the rest of the look. Windows is mostly utilitarian. Microsoft doesn't seem overly concerned with providing anything other than a very polished, professional look for its users. Only idiots like the Linux losers focus on elegant little toys to spruce up the desktop at the expense of its stability. 3D cube anyone? >>>> Linux is only slightly better than OS X though: it's laughable how many >>>> applications will simply cease to work correctly because you updated one of >>>> the many packages it referred to. >>> >>> Heck, look at how it is suggested you update some of the most common distros >>> - wipe and re-install. Even if you get all the old apps to work what a pain. >>> Neither Windows or OS X suggest this. >> >> Windows is so adamant about making sure that you never have to reinstall >> the operating system that they now provide you with features to wipe the >> slate clean without actually needing to re-install the OS. You can even >> wipe everything clean and conserve your personal documents if you wish. > > OS X has always been this way. I have re-installed my OS a couple of times > through the years... but never had to worry about re-installing all my apps > and my data. Hmmm, I did have to re-install some Adobe programs and a couple > of drivers... but that was it. And I have over 500 programs in my > Applications folder. > > Wow. Just checked that. Need to clean some out I am guessing. :) I hope they're all legal! ;) >> Technically, Linux offers you the same if you were smart enough to put >> /home on a separate partition, but default installs don't always install >> things in that manner. Either way, Microsoft is doing a good job and >> doesn't deserve to be lied about the way Linux "advocates" do. > > Windows XP was pretty good for its time and I liked Windows 7. Even 8 is > pretty good but I never got used to the new UI. Seems they are backing off > of it for Windows 10 and giving it away. Nothing wrong with them doing so - > Linux and OS X are also free these days. Linux is free because it has to be. Nobody in their right mind would pay money for that tripe. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 19:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13A0BBD.49253%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286297 |
On 3/26/15, 2:25 PM, in article mf1tf0$q03$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: ... >>> I like their elegance and the fact that they tend to make their >>> applications work very consistently, but the slowness is more than a >>> little distracting as is the fact that you need to always be on the >>> bleeding edge if you want to matter in Apple's eyes. >> >> My wife has an iMac that is 7 or 8 years old. It still runs the newest OS >> and the newest programs - though of course slower than my newer iMac. >> >> So while I agree they drop the old too quickly it is not like my wife is on >> the bleeding edge here. Even then, though, they have re-done iWork and other >> programs and toss the old... and then leave programs have complete. It is >> annoying. > > Until the last two versions of OS X came out (I believe it was the last > two but it might just have been the last one), older iMacs like hers > were essentially locked out of operating system upgrades. The fact that > Apple allowed her to have the latest version is an anomaly, not the norm. Macs usually support the current OS for about 7 years or so. It was shorter for some as they moved to Intel, but overall this is what I have found. >>> Besides, their security is absolute shit. >> >> The fact they tend to be hacked quickly in the contests looking for such is >> a concern, but I have never had an issue or known anyone who has on a Mac. >> The only real users who have to be concerned deeply about security are those >> who use Windows and Android. > > I can't argue with you there. Mac users live in their own world where > concerns such as security completely slip their minds. They are > essentially the embodiment of "ignorance is bliss." There are > simultaneously so many things and nothing wrong with that. It is good to be aware of security concerns on ANY OS, but only with the two I mention above is there a big concern for most users. I have literally NEVER seen an OS X machine that is infected with malware ... and I have run ClamX and the like to check. [I first said a Mac, but that is not true - there were some malware that infected OS 6... and then was blocked in OS 7 I think.] >>>> Yes, I still prefer OS X as my primary system but I do not deny the >>>> weaknesses of the system or the ecosystem. Wish the "advocates" could learn >>>> that. >>> >>> If I had to choose between Linux (and its users) and OS X (and its >>> zealots), I'd gladly pick Apple. >> >> And I would move to Windows before ANY Linux distro. :) >> >> I actually thought Windows 7 was a pretty good OS, even if I did not like >> the window borders and much of the rest of the look. > > Windows is mostly utilitarian. Microsoft doesn't seem overly concerned > with providing anything other than a very polished, professional look > for its users. Only idiots like the Linux losers focus on elegant little > toys to spruce up the desktop at the expense of its stability. 3D cube > anyone? When it serves a purpose I have nothing against a cube transition, but when done just to show off, as is mostly the case on Linux, it is absurd. I did not like the borders on Windows 7 with their transparency and then the outer glow on text so you could read it. Just nasty. Not that one could not get used to it. And Yosemite is just as bad (or at least close) with its transparency. I have it turned off. ... >> OS X has always been this way. I have re-installed my OS a couple of times >> through the years... but never had to worry about re-installing all my apps >> and my data. Hmmm, I did have to re-install some Adobe programs and a couple >> of drivers... but that was it. And I have over 500 programs in my >> Applications folder. >> >> Wow. Just checked that. Need to clean some out I am guessing. :) > > I hope they're all legal! ;) They are. Every last one. >>> Technically, Linux offers you the same if you were smart enough to put >>> /home on a separate partition, but default installs don't always install >>> things in that manner. Either way, Microsoft is doing a good job and >>> doesn't deserve to be lied about the way Linux "advocates" do. >> >> Windows XP was pretty good for its time and I liked Windows 7. Even 8 is >> pretty good but I never got used to the new UI. Seems they are backing off >> of it for Windows 10 and giving it away. Nothing wrong with them doing so - >> Linux and OS X are also free these days. > > Linux is free because it has to be. Nobody in their right mind would pay > money for that tripe. Pretty much. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-25 20:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mevi7n$3hr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286003 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > Slimer wrote: > >> On 2015-03-25 5:00 PM, Ezekiel wrote: >>> "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message >>> >>> GNOME was started in August 1997 by Miguel de Icaza and Federico Mena as >>> >> <snip> > > Which is really hilarious if he cites "lack of backward compatibility and > fragmentation" is his reasons. Because OSX is of all the OS the worst one in > these regards. By a very long shot. Even windows is far better in these > things. Not to mention linux, which is usually far better than windows in > backwards compatibility Whatever his old accomplishments with GNOME, de Icaza lost his credibility with many in the OSS community. I wouldn't trust him anymore. -- I have no doubt that it is a part of the destiny of the human race, in its gradual improvement, to leave off eating animals. -- Thoreau
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-25 20:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vqmdnVrtr6YC8Y7InZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286062 |
On 03/25/15 18:01, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2015-03-25 5:00 PM, Ezekiel wrote: >>>> "Melzzzzz"<mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>> GNOME was started in August 1997 by Miguel de Icaza and Federico Mena as >>>> >>> <snip> >> >> Which is really hilarious if he cites "lack of backward compatibility and >> fragmentation" is his reasons. Because OSX is of all the OS the worst one in >> these regards. By a very long shot. Even windows is far better in these >> things. Not to mention linux, which is usually far better than windows in >> backwards compatibility > > Whatever his old accomplishments with GNOME, de Icaza lost his credibility > with many in the OSS community. I wouldn't trust him anymore. > That's because he found out about the cult-herd mentality. He also found out, along with Linus, how many of you idiots are mentally ill. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 03:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20150326033234.00b8a8aa@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #286108 |
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:19:07 -0600 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > On 03/25/15 18:01, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > > Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > >> Slimer wrote: > >> > >>> On 2015-03-25 5:00 PM, Ezekiel wrote: > >>>> "Melzzzzz"<mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message > >>>> > >>>> GNOME was started in August 1997 by Miguel de Icaza and Federico > >>>> Mena as > >>>> > >>> <snip> > >> > >> Which is really hilarious if he cites "lack of backward > >> compatibility and fragmentation" is his reasons. Because OSX is of > >> all the OS the worst one in these regards. By a very long shot. > >> Even windows is far better in these things. Not to mention linux, > >> which is usually far better than windows in backwards compatibility > > > > Whatever his old accomplishments with GNOME, de Icaza lost his > > credibility with many in the OSS community. I wouldn't trust him > > anymore. > > > That's because he found out about the cult-herd mentality. Icaza is Micro$oft's player. He is pushing .NET on Apple platform as well... > He also found out, along with Linus, how many of you idiots are > mentally ill. > > Sure thing...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 04:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mf0222$g9l$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286124 |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:32:34 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote:
> Icaza is Micro$oft's player. He is pushing .NET on Apple platform as
> well...
I didn't know that. So when did he sell out to the Monopoly?
--
When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
it'll be a vacuum cleaner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-25 21:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <241b8096-862b-4726-8d0f-f4b6cf0a4e88@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #286159 |
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 10:31:51 PM UTC-6, ronb wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:32:34 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote: > > > Icaza is Micro$oft's player. He is pushing .NET on Apple platform as > > well... > > I didn't know that. So when did he sell out to the Monopoly? https://github.com/dotnet/corefx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 10:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.5362019794875461137@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #286159 |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 04:30:58 +0000 (UTC), ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:32:34 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote: > > Icaza is Micro$oft's player. He is pushing .NET on Apple platform as > > well... > I didn't know that. So when did he sell out to the Monopoly? I am not sure, I think when he started Mono. -- Press any key to continue or any other to quit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 09:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mf0lav$asu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286174 |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:53:14 +0100, Mel wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 04:30:58 +0000 (UTC), ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:32:34 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote:
>
>
>> > Icaza is Micro$oft's player. He is pushing .NET on Apple platform
> as
>> > well...
>
>
>> I didn't know that. So when did he sell out to the Monopoly?
>
> I am not sure, I think when he started Mono.
I don't hate Icaza, I just ignore his attempt to push Linux towards .NET.
I think he got caught up in his own self-importance. That's what's good
about Linux. You've got choice. If you choose not to go Icaza's direction
(which is how most Linux users chose) than you're not forced to use
something you don't like. With Windows 8 (for example) it was "take or
leave it." What Microsoft didn't expect is that so many would "leave it'
-- or at least not update to it. What's pathetic is how WinDrones made
believe everything was hunky dory with Windows 8 -- until 10 was
announced. Much like they did with Vista -- until Windows 7 was announced.
--
When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
it'll be a vacuum cleaner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 07:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <avu7hapjb4ii7s56rmlmibmers546vunp0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #286178 |
ronb wrote: > What's pathetic is how WinDrones made >believe everything was hunky dory with Windows 8 -- until 10 was >announced. Much like they did with Vista -- until Windows 7 was announced. To be fair, some of them admitted that they did not like Windwoes 8. Hmm... Was there ever only "1 vendor" of Android products, or is "Ezekiel" a lying idiot? -- "Android = One OS with 1 vendor Windows = One OS with many vendors" - "Ezekiel", arguing that, with Windows, you have more choices
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 09:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf11im$ruc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286198 |
chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > Hmm... Was there ever only "1 vendor" of Android products, or is > "Ezekiel" a lying idiot? > > -- > "Android = One OS with 1 vendor > Windows = One OS with many vendors" > > - "Ezekiel", arguing that, with Windows, you have more choices Wow. Just.... wow. -- A programmer is a person who passes as an exacting expert on the basis of being able to turn out, after innumerable punching, an infinite series of incomprehensible answers calculated with micrometric precisions from vague assumptions based on debatable figures taken from inconclusive documents and carried out on instruments of problematical accuracy by persons of dubious reliability and questionable mentality for the avowed purpose of annoying and confounding a hopelessly defenseless department that was unfortunate enough to ask for the information in the first place. -- IEEE Grid newsmagazine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 14:06 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <cdidnbpyQ4NF-4nInZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286211 |
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Hmm... Was there ever only "1 vendor" of Android products, or is >> "Ezekiel" a lying idiot? >> >> -- >> "Android = One OS with 1 vendor >> Windows = One OS with many vendors" >> >> - "Ezekiel", arguing that, with Windows, you have more choices > > Wow. Just.... wow. > Ah, a girlie boy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 21:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bvhd03f.a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286277 |
GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Hmm... Was there ever only "1 vendor" of Android products, or is >>> "Ezekiel" a lying idiot? >>> >>> -- >>> "Android = One OS with 1 vendor >>> Windows = One OS with many vendors" >>> >>> - "Ezekiel", arguing that, with Windows, you have more choices >> >> Wow. Just.... wow. >> > Ah, a girlie boy. God I hate that "wow just wow" Macfaggotry. (Almost as bad as I hate "wait for it").
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 13:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mcWdnWp41pzNKIjInZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286303 |
owl wrote: > GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >>> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> Hmm... Was there ever only "1 vendor" of Android products, or is >>>> "Ezekiel" a lying idiot? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> "Android = One OS with 1 vendor >>>> Windows = One OS with many vendors" >>>> >>>> - "Ezekiel", arguing that, with Windows, you have more choices >>> >>> Wow. Just.... wow. >>> >> Ah, a girlie boy. > > God I hate that "wow just wow" Macfaggotry. (Almost as bad as I hate > "wait for it"). I know. He must've ate too much soy products. That crap ruins testosterone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 14:06 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <cdidnbtyQ4Mj-4nInZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286198 |
chrisv wrote: Says the lieing idiot known as Turdv. <snipped horse crap>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 08:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf0vp7$jg0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286178 |
On 3/26/2015 5:59 AM, ronb wrote: > What's pathetic is how WinDrones made > believe everything was hunky dory with Windows 8 What a stupid, piece of shit lie. > -- until 10 was > announced. Much like they did with Vista -- until Windows 7 was announced. A similar stupid, piece of shit lie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 09:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf108d$n88$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286178 |
On 2015-03-26 5:59 AM, ronb wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:53:14 +0100, Mel wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 04:30:58 +0000 (UTC), ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:32:34 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote: >> >> >>>> Icaza is Micro$oft's player. He is pushing .NET on Apple platform >> as >>>> well... >> >> >>> I didn't know that. So when did he sell out to the Monopoly? >> >> I am not sure, I think when he started Mono. > > I don't hate Icaza, I just ignore his attempt to push Linux towards .NET. > I think he got caught up in his own self-importance. That's what's good > about Linux. You've got choice. If you choose not to go Icaza's direction > (which is how most Linux users chose) than you're not forced to use > something you don't like. With Windows 8 (for example) it was "take or > leave it." What Microsoft didn't expect is that so many would "leave it' > -- or at least not update to it. What's pathetic is how WinDrones made > believe everything was hunky dory with Windows 8 -- until 10 was > announced. Much like they did with Vista -- until Windows 7 was announced. Actually, you'll notice that the complaints about Vista and 8 were enormous and from the most dedicated of "WinDrones" as well. Most of these people threatened to leave the ecosystem for Apple or Linux and articles in magazines such as Maximum PC and PC Gamer trumpeted these facts. The MINORITY of people defended Vista and 8 and I am one of these people. The reason we did is because unlike the majority of users, who simply looked at Vista and 8 and decided they wanted nothing to do with it, we actually _used_ these operating systems and noticed that they were significant improvements over the previous generation. You can stop with your lying now. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 14:05 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <cdidnbhyQ4MF-4nInZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286178 |
ronb wrote: You should talk, you lintroll cultist. <snipped drivel>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 09:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf139f$48n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286174 |
"Mel" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message news:almarsoft.5362019794875461137@news.albasani.net... > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 04:30:58 +0000 (UTC), ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:32:34 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote: > > >> > Icaza is Micro$oft's player. He is pushing .NET on Apple platform > as >> > well... > > >> I didn't know that. So when did he sell out to the Monopoly? > > I am not sure, I think when he started Mono. > <quote> .NET Core .NET Core is a free and open-source partial implementation of the .NET Framework. It consists of CoreCLR and CoreFX, which are partial forks of CLR and BCL respectively. NET Core comes with an improved JIT compiler, called RyuJIT. Portability While Microsoft has never implemented the full framework on any system except Microsoft Windows, it has engineered the framework to be platform-agnostic,[15] and cross-platform implementations are available for other operating systems (see Silverlight and § Alternative implementations). Microsoft submitted the specifications for CLI (which includes the core class libraries, CTS, and CIL), C#, and C++/CLI to both ECMA and ISO, making them available as official standards. This makes it possible for third parties to create compatible implementations of the framework and its languages on other platforms. </quote> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework I don't consider making a new programming framework available to whoever wants to use it or chooses for their application as hijacking anything. If someone doesn't want to use it - don't use it. If someone wants to use it then it's their choice. Nobody is being forced to use or support anything that they don't want.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web