Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242580 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 415 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:11 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:35 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 11:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 12:46 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:43 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 14:59 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 18:09 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 22:02 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:40 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:46 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:48 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:42 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:49 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Richard Starkey <nobody@ringo.jpunix.net> - 2014-05-08 14:23 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 21:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 12:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... John Kennerson <nobody@isis.cpunk.us> - 2014-05-08 15:25 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 12:34 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:46 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-08 11:17 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 14:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 13:22 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-08 19:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 18:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:09 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 07:40 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 08:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 09:51 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 09:57 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:16 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:05 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:23 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 10:43 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 11:36 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 19:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 18:25 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:13 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:34 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:35 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:43 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-09 08:18 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-09 07:07 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 10:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 09:20 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 11:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 07:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:10 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:27 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 10:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 10:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 17:42 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:12 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-09 10:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 12:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:30 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:27 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:39 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 11:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:05 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:14 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 12:07 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:05 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-10 09:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 01:45 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 20:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 22:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 22:06 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 05:06 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 07:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:32 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:35 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:38 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 09:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 16:03 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:00 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 11:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:12 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 08:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:50 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:30 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:37 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 13:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:20 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:49 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 11:56 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 12:25 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 12:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:03 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 13:19 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 12:02 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:34 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 16:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 15:28 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:07 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:12 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 16:10 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 21:40 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-13 04:24 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 13:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 14:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:52 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:53 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 19:41 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:09 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 16:50 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:21 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:28 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:17 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:04 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 22:25 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:22 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:38 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:49 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:08 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:22 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:03 -0400
Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 19:02 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 22:31 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:15 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 09:04 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:23 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 16:48 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:13 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:26 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:35 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:54 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 17:01 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 22:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-16 18:06 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 10:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 16:45 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 09:01 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 21:32 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:47 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 19:30 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:34 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-18 14:02 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:53 +0000
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:47 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 07:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:24 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-18 01:07 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 22:55 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 20:29 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 18:56 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:26 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:01 -0700
Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:38 -0400
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:59 +0200
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:16 -0400
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 16:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:18 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:20 -0600
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:46 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 17:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:07 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:30 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 14:52 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 17:09 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:55 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:20 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:39 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 10:47 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-17 20:49 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 11:57 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-17 20:08 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 12:29 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2014-05-18 11:44 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-18 08:45 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:40 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:27 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-17 16:24 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 11:14 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-18 09:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:36 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:42 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 17:47 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 09:15 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:28 +0000
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 11:53 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-18 23:09 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 16:37 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:11 -0400
I like MicroSoft -because- it's mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 14:50 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:35 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:56 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:12 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:43 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:43 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:13 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:34 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 18:21 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:27 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2014-05-15 16:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:42 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:00 -0400
DirectX 11.1 is now part of the Windows 8 SDK. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:21 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jesse <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> - 2014-05-14 22:02 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregoryhall@home.fake> - 2014-05-15 18:53 -0400
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-26 22:55 -0400
$999 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-26 21:32 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:20 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-15 04:33 -0700
I just bought a $430 graphics card. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 13:16 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:31 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:12 -0700
The Linux advantage. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 20:02 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-15 09:46 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 02:09 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 11:29 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage.  Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 09:55 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:50 -0400
When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:35 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-15 09:56 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 10:05 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-15 12:00 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 22:47 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:05 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 04:57 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:10 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:21 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:45 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:57 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:40 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:54 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:53 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 10:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 10:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 21:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-21 07:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 16:22 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:29 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 18:53 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 12:11 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Tralfaz <directly_above_the_center_of_the_earth@santas_deer_poop_too_much.org> - 2014-05-20 16:24 +0000
The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-20 13:02 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 17:12 +0000
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:26 -0700
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:36 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 14:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 14:19 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:20 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:43 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:17 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:52 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:44 +0200
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:25 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:55 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:17 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:35 -0600
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:00 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-16 11:52 +0000
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 12:01 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 09:15 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. "Steve Carroll." <fretwizzin@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 09:19 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 11:06 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:27 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:57 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:18 -0400
The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:26 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:49 -0400
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 22:25 -0400
Compared to the internet, people are boring. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 20:25 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:33 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:51 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:40 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:40 -0700
I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:07 -0700
Re: I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:17 -0400
100% off Visual Studio Ultimate 2013, today only. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:59 -0700
Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 15:52 -0700
Re: Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 17:11 -0600
Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0700
Re: Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 19:54 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:52 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:20 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:39 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:29 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:39 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:11 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:24 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-09 00:53 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-08 21:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:35 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400
Page 9 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 21 Next page →
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 21:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkrt76$arf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243256 |
On 05/12/2014 07:10 PM, -hh wrote: > On Monday, May 12, 2014 4:02:40 PM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> Lloyd E Parsons wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties >>> On 2014-05-12 19:02:11 +0000, -hh said: >>>> On Monday, May 12, 2014 2:36:09 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >>>>> Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> (snip lies) >>>> >>>> So much for chrisv's claims of a 'zero day' killfile. >> >> The term went right over -highhorse's head. > > Oh, look! Another poster pronounces to the world > that he can't refute facts, so he reverts to Ad Hominem attacks. > > > The fact of the matter is that it isn't any coincidence whatsoever > when the likes of your boy chrisv is utterly STUPID enough to make > subsequent posts which clearly refer to discussions which he had > claimed were preemptively in killfiles. > > People simply aren't as stupid as you need them to be. > > And FWIW, that also includes the 98% of consumers worldwide who > aren't stupid enough to use desktop Linux... > > ...which begs the question of if the remaining 2% really are that stupid, > or if they're simply in such dire financial straits that they can't afford > anything better. > > If its the latter such that you could use some extra cash in a part time > job, just say so ... I'm sufficiently busy with my various enterprises that > I could hire the likes of you for some suitably minimum wage stuff. It of > course goes without saying that this opportunity doesn't include any time > sitting behind a keyboard - - I've already seen how poorly you do at that. > I could use roughly 20 man-hours this coming weekend; just give the word. smackdown! Note: Creepy's time is measured in girlie-man-hours.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-13 04:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9a1c8f6b-b406-4107-abc5-fe72233aea32@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243311 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 9:40:54 PM UTC-4, DFS wrote: > On 05/12/2014 07:10 PM, -hh wrote: > > > On Monday, May 12, 2014 4:02:40 PM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > > >> Lloyd E Parsons wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties > > >>> On 2014-05-12 19:02:11 +0000, -hh said: > > >>>> On Monday, May 12, 2014 2:36:09 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: > > >>>>> Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> (snip lies) > > >>>> > > >>>> So much for chrisv's claims of a 'zero day' killfile. > > >> > > >> The term went right over -highhorse's head. > > > > > > Oh, look! Another poster pronounces to the world > > > that he can't refute facts, so he reverts to Ad Hominem attacks. > > > > > > > > > The fact of the matter is that it isn't any coincidence whatsoever > > > when the likes of your boy chrisv is utterly STUPID enough to make > > > subsequent posts which clearly refer to discussions which he had > > > claimed were preemptively in killfiles. > > > > > > People simply aren't as stupid as you need them to be. > > > > > > And FWIW, that also includes the 98% of consumers worldwide who > > > aren't stupid enough to use desktop Linux... > > > > > > ...which begs the question of if the remaining 2% really are that stupid, > > > or if they're simply in such dire financial straits that they can't afford > > > anything better. > > > > > > If its the latter such that you could use some extra cash in a part time > > > job, just say so ... I'm sufficiently busy with my various enterprises that > > > I could hire the likes of you for some suitably minimum wage stuff. It of > > > course goes without saying that this opportunity doesn't include any time > > > sitting behind a keyboard - - I've already seen how poorly you do at that. > > > I could use roughly 20 man-hours this coming weekend; just give the word. > > > smackdown! > > Note: Creepy's time is measured in girlie-man-hours. I'd already inflated the hours on the assumption that they're fat & lazy sloths. The punch list was some landscaping (4), car detailing (6) and cleaning the garage (10). If they're able to perform that well enough, for the follow-up, I have two rooms that I want to get their floors refurbished this year, so they need to be packed up and emptied, have the old W/W carpet and underlying stuff all pulled up, etc. I'll handle the removal & refinishing of the baseboard/trim, etc, as that actually requires some modest amount of talent, but I'd use them again to move the furniture back in, etc. Figure another 20-30 hours or so, so between just these two 'weekend' jobs, they could probably have enough additional cash in hand to buy a brand new PC. Or if we're lowbrow... for them to finally pay a month's rent to Mom. ;-) -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 13:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0e38c3c7-85d9-449a-ac1b-7cc40ec06872@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243198 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 1:02:11 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > On Monday, May 12, 2014 2:36:09 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: > > > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > > > > > > > (snip lies) > > > > So much for chrisv's claims of a 'zero day' killfile. > > > > > > > Poor "Lloyd". Repeating your lies won't make them true. > > > > Just what lies would these be, chrisv? Pretending to know that I'm "forging" myself (this is Snit's ridiculous idea) isn't exactly honest.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 14:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <btclvjFckd1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #243191 |
On 2014-05-12 18:36:09 +0000, chrisv said: > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > >> (snip lies) > > Poor "Lloyd". Repeating your lies won't make them true. Compelling > differences, advantages, etc, of LInux have been explained in here > thousands of times. They are real and undeniable, no matter what > (most of) the market has "chosen". You must have read about all those things in a different group, sure as hell didn't read them here. Here is all about BS from all, almost all the time. > > The same applies to the Mac. Yet Apple has become a huge, highly profitable company while the same cannot be said for Linux on desktops OR servers. Only in portable devices are any real fat profits being made, and on those it is Android to the consumer, not Linux at all. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 14:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tu82n9p4kmueummfctgmt2otc2qbtbuilh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #243191 |
chrisv wrote:
>Lloyd E Parsons wrote:
>>
>> (snip lies)
>
>Poor "Lloyd". Repeating your lies won't make them true. Compelling
>differences, advantages, etc, of LInux have been explained in here
>thousands of times. They are real and undeniable, no matter what
>(most of) the market has "chosen".
>
>The same applies to the Mac.
("Lloyd" follow-up posts were deleted, unread. I'm sure he's just
repeating the same lies, the same beyond-idiotic "if there were
compelling differences it would be more popular" illogic.)
--
'Which "open standard" formats would these be? The ones that are still
non standard or the MS Office ones which are used in 95% or more of
businesses?' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 14:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <btcn3eFcs32U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #243208 |
On 2014-05-12 19:44:03 +0000, chrisv said:
> chrisv wrote:
>
>> Lloyd E Parsons wrote:
>>>
>>> (snip lies)
>>
>> Poor "Lloyd". Repeating your lies won't make them true. Compelling
>> differences, advantages, etc, of LInux have been explained in here
>> thousands of times. They are real and undeniable, no matter what
>> (most of) the market has "chosen".
>>
>> The same applies to the Mac.
>
> ("Lloyd" follow-up posts were deleted, unread. I'm sure he's just
> repeating the same lies, the same beyond-idiotic "if there were
> compelling differences it would be more popular" illogic.)
Of course you know that because you read every damned line. And of
course, the gist of my reply doesn't agree with your pie-in-the-sky
outlook when it comes to Linux on the desktop, so you 'snipped unread'!
Right, I know that just everyone believes that! :)
Snip this - Linux on the desktop is so compelling that Chrisv feels
more compelled to keep using Windows!!
--
Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 09:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkvqie$unr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243213 |
On 5/12/2014 3:52 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote:
> On 2014-05-12 19:44:03 +0000, chrisv said:
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> Lloyd E Parsons wrote:
>>>>
>>>> (snip lies)
>>>
>>> Poor "Lloyd". Repeating your lies won't make them true. Compelling
>>> differences, advantages, etc, of LInux have been explained in here
>>> thousands of times. They are real and undeniable, no matter what
>>> (most of) the market has "chosen".
>>>
>>> The same applies to the Mac.
>>
>> ("Lloyd" follow-up posts were deleted, unread. I'm sure he's just
>> repeating the same lies, the same beyond-idiotic "if there were
>> compelling differences it would be more popular" illogic.)
>
> Of course you know that because you read every damned line. And of
> course, the gist of my reply doesn't agree with your pie-in-the-sky
> outlook when it comes to Linux on the desktop, so you 'snipped unread'!
>
> Right, I know that just everyone believes that! :)
>
> Snip this - Linux on the desktop is so compelling that Chrisv feels more
> compelled to keep using Windows!!
It's all about the money for turd and Creepy and Walrus and the rest of
the cola cesspool gang.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 12:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF9675FD.37166%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243208 |
On 5/12/14, 12:44 PM, in article tu82n9p4kmueummfctgmt2otc2qbtbuilh@4ax.com,
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
>
>> Lloyd E Parsons wrote:
>>>
>>> (snip lies)
>>
>> Poor "Lloyd". Repeating your lies won't make them true. Compelling
>> differences, advantages, etc, of LInux have been explained in here
>> thousands of times. They are real and undeniable, no matter what
>> (most of) the market has "chosen".
>>
>> The same applies to the Mac.
>
> ("Lloyd" follow-up posts were deleted, unread. I'm sure he's just
> repeating the same lies, the same beyond-idiotic "if there were
> compelling differences it would be more popular" illogic.)
Why advertise how you cannot refute his claims? Weird?
--
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF96EDEF.37223%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243191 |
On 5/12/14, 11:36 AM, in article cp42n9tb5a5bk61ljl128tv8qdmn285kd6@4ax.com, "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > >> (snip lies) > > Poor "Lloyd". Repeating your lies won't make them true. Compelling > differences, advantages, etc, of LInux have been explained in here > thousands of times. They are real and undeniable, no matter what > (most of) the market has "chosen". > > The same applies to the Mac. Of note: you failed to mention one redeeming quality of desktop Linux. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 15:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkr6bn$ra5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243182 |
On 14-05-12 02:19 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > On 2014-05-12 16:56:00 +0000, chrisv said: > >> JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> As a user of a minority platform yourself, that is a really retarded >>> argument to make. >> >> Despite Linux having many compelling differences, most stay away >> because if the relative lack of third-party support. Windwoes has the >> apps. Simple as that. > > None of Linux's differences are compelling on the desktop. It just is > not the strength of Linux no matter how much you wish it was. To be completely honest, there are certain things about the GNU/Linux desktop which are compelling. It's good to know that if ever I need software to do something which suddenly became a need, there likely is a program available in the repositories. It's also pretty refreshing to know that many of the things I would usually have to PAY to do in Windows (if open-source software weren't available in Windows and OS X), cost me nothing to do in GNU/Linux like ripping DVDs and/or CDs. Knowing, also, that I have several different interfaces to choose from and that they all work with the same set of software feels great. Granted, some of the desktop environments are fairly buggy like KDE or simply horrible like Gnome, but Unity exists and it happens to be pretty great whereas XFCE is fairly pretty and works for low-end machines. The biggest thing, for me anyway, is that GNU/Linux allows me to have FULL control of my computer. OS X did nothing but limit me and Windows basically INSULTED me by telling me that the battery which came with my computer was incompatible with it (in addition to refusing to allow me to install the recovery disks because I changed the hard disk). Sure, GNU/Linux isn't perfect, but if the bugs were ironed out and all of the interfaces worked flawlessly, it would provide way more advantages to users than Windows or OS X do. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 14:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <btcm8iFcm28U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #243199 |
On 2014-05-12 19:10:46 +0000, Silver Slimer said: > On 14-05-12 02:19 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >> On 2014-05-12 16:56:00 +0000, chrisv said: >> >>> JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> As a user of a minority platform yourself, that is a really retarded >>>> argument to make. >>> >>> Despite Linux having many compelling differences, most stay away >>> because if the relative lack of third-party support. Windwoes has the >>> apps. Simple as that. >> >> None of Linux's differences are compelling on the desktop. It just is >> not the strength of Linux no matter how much you wish it was. > > To be completely honest, there are certain things about the GNU/Linux > desktop which are compelling. It's good to know that if ever I need > software to do something which suddenly became a need, there likely is a > program available in the repositories. It's also pretty refreshing to > know that many of the things I would usually have to PAY to do in > Windows (if open-source software weren't available in Windows and OS X), > cost me nothing to do in GNU/Linux like ripping DVDs and/or CDs. I've done that in the past, never paid for a program to do rips with yet. Not on Windows, not on OSX. So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) > Knowing, also, that I have several different interfaces to choose from > and that they all work with the same set of software feels great. > Granted, some of the desktop environments are fairly buggy like KDE or > simply horrible like Gnome, but Unity exists and it happens to be pretty > great whereas XFCE is fairly pretty and works for low-end machines. The > biggest thing, for me anyway, is that GNU/Linux allows me to have FULL > control of my computer. OS X did nothing but limit me and Windows > basically INSULTED me by telling me that the battery which came with my > computer was incompatible with it (in addition to refusing to allow me > to install the recovery disks because I changed the hard disk). Sure, > GNU/Linux isn't perfect, but if the bugs were ironed out and all of the > interfaces worked flawlessly, it would provide way more advantages to > users than Windows or OS X do. I don't get all that hung up on the presentation of the desktop on any OS. I find all of them just fine to do the things I want to do, mostly not involving using the desktop at all. It isn't the desktop after all, it is the apps that run on the platform that really matter. IOW, if you're futzing around on the desktop, your just doing techie jerking off!! :) -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 15:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkr8mn$b9r$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243206 |
On 14-05-12 03:37 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >> To be completely honest, there are certain things about the GNU/Linux >> desktop which are compelling. It's good to know that if ever I need >> software to do something which suddenly became a need, there likely is a >> program available in the repositories. It's also pretty refreshing to >> know that many of the things I would usually have to PAY to do in >> Windows (if open-source software weren't available in Windows and OS X), >> cost me nothing to do in GNU/Linux like ripping DVDs and/or CDs. > > I've done that in the past, never paid for a program to do rips with > yet. Not on Windows, not on OSX. > > So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you > can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that goes entirely against the very nature of free software. >> Knowing, also, that I have several different interfaces to choose from >> and that they all work with the same set of software feels great. >> Granted, some of the desktop environments are fairly buggy like KDE or >> simply horrible like Gnome, but Unity exists and it happens to be pretty >> great whereas XFCE is fairly pretty and works for low-end machines. The >> biggest thing, for me anyway, is that GNU/Linux allows me to have FULL >> control of my computer. OS X did nothing but limit me and Windows >> basically INSULTED me by telling me that the battery which came with my >> computer was incompatible with it (in addition to refusing to allow me >> to install the recovery disks because I changed the hard disk). Sure, >> GNU/Linux isn't perfect, but if the bugs were ironed out and all of the >> interfaces worked flawlessly, it would provide way more advantages to >> users than Windows or OS X do. > > I don't get all that hung up on the presentation of the desktop on any > OS. I find all of them just fine to do the things I want to do, mostly > not involving using the desktop at all. It isn't the desktop after all, > it is the apps that run on the platform that really matter. > > IOW, if you're futzing around on the desktop, your just doing techie > jerking off!! :) Perhaps. However, some people find themselves a lot more productive when they're not wrestling with the interface. Which interface has them wrestle the least is up to them. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 14:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <btcn5jFcs32U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #243212 |
On 2014-05-12 19:50:47 +0000, Silver Slimer said: > On 14-05-12 03:37 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > >>> To be completely honest, there are certain things about the GNU/Linux >>> desktop which are compelling. It's good to know that if ever I need >>> software to do something which suddenly became a need, there likely is a >>> program available in the repositories. It's also pretty refreshing to >>> know that many of the things I would usually have to PAY to do in >>> Windows (if open-source software weren't available in Windows and OS X), >>> cost me nothing to do in GNU/Linux like ripping DVDs and/or CDs. >> >> I've done that in the past, never paid for a program to do rips with >> yet. Not on Windows, not on OSX. >> >> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you >> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) > > GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed > primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that > goes entirely against the very nature of free software. > >>> Knowing, also, that I have several different interfaces to choose from >>> and that they all work with the same set of software feels great. >>> Granted, some of the desktop environments are fairly buggy like KDE or >>> simply horrible like Gnome, but Unity exists and it happens to be pretty >>> great whereas XFCE is fairly pretty and works for low-end machines. The >>> biggest thing, for me anyway, is that GNU/Linux allows me to have FULL >>> control of my computer. OS X did nothing but limit me and Windows >>> basically INSULTED me by telling me that the battery which came with my >>> computer was incompatible with it (in addition to refusing to allow me >>> to install the recovery disks because I changed the hard disk). Sure, >>> GNU/Linux isn't perfect, but if the bugs were ironed out and all of the >>> interfaces worked flawlessly, it would provide way more advantages to >>> users than Windows or OS X do. >> >> I don't get all that hung up on the presentation of the desktop on any >> OS. I find all of them just fine to do the things I want to do, mostly >> not involving using the desktop at all. It isn't the desktop after all, >> it is the apps that run on the platform that really matter. >> >> IOW, if you're futzing around on the desktop, your just doing techie >> jerking off!! :) > > Perhaps. However, some people find themselves a lot more productive when > they're not wrestling with the interface. Which interface has them > wrestle the least is up to them. What 'wrestling' - click/double-click, app opens to do actual productive work. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 19:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkrm83$85m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243215 |
On 14-05-12 03:53 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > On 2014-05-12 19:50:47 +0000, Silver Slimer said: > >> On 14-05-12 03:37 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >> >>>> To be completely honest, there are certain things about the GNU/Linux >>>> desktop which are compelling. It's good to know that if ever I need >>>> software to do something which suddenly became a need, there likely >>>> is a >>>> program available in the repositories. It's also pretty refreshing to >>>> know that many of the things I would usually have to PAY to do in >>>> Windows (if open-source software weren't available in Windows and OS >>>> X), >>>> cost me nothing to do in GNU/Linux like ripping DVDs and/or CDs. >>> >>> I've done that in the past, never paid for a program to do rips with >>> yet. Not on Windows, not on OSX. >>> >>> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you >>> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) >> >> GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed >> primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that >> goes entirely against the very nature of free software. >> >>>> Knowing, also, that I have several different interfaces to choose from >>>> and that they all work with the same set of software feels great. >>>> Granted, some of the desktop environments are fairly buggy like KDE or >>>> simply horrible like Gnome, but Unity exists and it happens to be >>>> pretty >>>> great whereas XFCE is fairly pretty and works for low-end machines. The >>>> biggest thing, for me anyway, is that GNU/Linux allows me to have FULL >>>> control of my computer. OS X did nothing but limit me and Windows >>>> basically INSULTED me by telling me that the battery which came with my >>>> computer was incompatible with it (in addition to refusing to allow me >>>> to install the recovery disks because I changed the hard disk). Sure, >>>> GNU/Linux isn't perfect, but if the bugs were ironed out and all of the >>>> interfaces worked flawlessly, it would provide way more advantages to >>>> users than Windows or OS X do. >>> >>> I don't get all that hung up on the presentation of the desktop on any >>> OS. I find all of them just fine to do the things I want to do, mostly >>> not involving using the desktop at all. It isn't the desktop after all, >>> it is the apps that run on the platform that really matter. >>> >>> IOW, if you're futzing around on the desktop, your just doing techie >>> jerking off!! :) >> >> Perhaps. However, some people find themselves a lot more productive when >> they're not wrestling with the interface. Which interface has them >> wrestle the least is up to them. > > What 'wrestling' - click/double-click, app opens to do actual productive > work. Some people find that certain interfaces get in the way. OS X, for instance, bothers me very much. Especially its terrible file manager. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 17:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF96B0BF.371B7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243268 |
On 5/12/14, 4:41 PM, in article lkrm83$85m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote: >>> Perhaps. However, some people find themselves a lot more productive when >>> they're not wrestling with the interface. Which interface has them >>> wrestle the least is up to them. >> >> What 'wrestling' - click/double-click, app opens to do actual productive >> work. > > Some people find that certain interfaces get in the way. OS X, for > instance, bothers me very much. Especially its terrible file manager. What things about the file manager bother you? My big pet peeve with it is how it pretty much dies with some forms of network errors. This has improved over the years, but still happens. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 16:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnln2ghb.shs.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #243212 |
On 2014-05-12, Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote:
> On 14-05-12 03:37 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote:
>
>>> To be completely honest, there are certain things about the GNU/Linux
>>> desktop which are compelling. It's good to know that if ever I need
>>> software to do something which suddenly became a need, there likely is a
>>> program available in the repositories. It's also pretty refreshing to
>>> know that many of the things I would usually have to PAY to do in
>>> Windows (if open-source software weren't available in Windows and OS X),
>>> cost me nothing to do in GNU/Linux like ripping DVDs and/or CDs.
>>
>> I've done that in the past, never paid for a program to do rips with
>> yet. Not on Windows, not on OSX.
>>
>> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you
>> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :)
>
> GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed
> primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that
For IT?
You've wandered off the reservation kid.
IT is not the area where non-DOS platforms has the problems.
[deletia]
--
Sophocles wants his cut. |||
/ | \
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 20:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkrohd$k95$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243245 |
On 14-05-12 05:50 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you >>> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) >> >> GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed >> primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that > > For IT? > > You've wandered off the reservation kid. > > IT is not the area where non-DOS platforms has the problems. I don't think you have even the faintest idea of what we're talking about. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 18:28 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <voSdnT1s-tev-uzOnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #243278 |
On 5/12/2014 6:21 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-12 05:50 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >>>> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you >>>> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) >>> >>> GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed >>> primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that >> >> For IT? >> >> You've wandered off the reservation kid. >> >> IT is not the area where non-DOS platforms has the problems. > > I don't think you have even the faintest idea of what we're talking about. > I'll say. Jeds wandered further off the reservation than anybody else. He's lost. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-13 15:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnln4v9g.sp.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #243278 |
On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote:
> On 14-05-12 05:50 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>>>> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you
>>>> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :)
>>>
>>> GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed
>>> primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that
>>
>> For IT?
>>
>> You've wandered off the reservation kid.
>>
>> IT is not the area where non-DOS platforms has the problems.
>
> I don't think you have even the faintest idea of what we're talking about.
>
You are truely a legend in your own mind.
--
Apple: Because the individual is not statistically meaningful. |||
/ | \
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-13 18:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lku5ll$h7h$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243488 |
On 14-05-13 04:14 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote: >> On 14-05-12 05:50 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>>>> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you >>>>> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) >>>> >>>> GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed >>>> primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that >>> >>> For IT? >>> >>> You've wandered off the reservation kid. >>> >>> IT is not the area where non-DOS platforms has the problems. >> >> I don't think you have even the faintest idea of what we're talking about. >> > > You are truely a legend in your own mind. And you've provided additional evidence of being a complete imbecile by misspelling a simple word like "truly." -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web