Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286324 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-26 19:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-03-31 10:49 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 143 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 19:11 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 04:10 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 21:45 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:08 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 13:14 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:16 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:36 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 18:44 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:14 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:35 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:59 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-27 13:23 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:40 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:11 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 13:18 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:21 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 13:44 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:46 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 13:52 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 18:01 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:45 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 18:58 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 15:05 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 19:13 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:16 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:32 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:43 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:55 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 16:01 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:14 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 16:47 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 00:32 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 18:08 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 01:21 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 18:30 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 01:50 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 22:54 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 20:02 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 23:22 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-28 09:03 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 13:13 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 13:42 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 14:17 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:13 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 12:23 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 19:38 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 19:59 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 21:51 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 18:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 09:06 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 15:51 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 11:22 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 12:48 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 14:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 11:14 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 11:17 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-28 23:12 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 18:55 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:11 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 19:20 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 00:29 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-28 23:38 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 19:43 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 23:51 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:45 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:00 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-29 16:14 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:42 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 12:41 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 16:59 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-29 13:03 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 03:45 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 03:54 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 07:00 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:27 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 20:56 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 21:13 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:21 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:46 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 01:28 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:25 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:47 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 16:42 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-28 19:44 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 09:13 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:45 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 22:40 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:43 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 09:51 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:22 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-28 18:49 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-28 09:47 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 14:15 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 09:49 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:02 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 11:52 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 10:16 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 15:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:10 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:17 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 10:25 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:29 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:30 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:36 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:06 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 09:20 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 18:31 +0200
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:36 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 12:23 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:45 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:01 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:01 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 20:11 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 21:58 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:09 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 20:10 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:36 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:13 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:35 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:32 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 07:34 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:22 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 08:45 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:16 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-04 20:00 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-04 18:42 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 08:48 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 08:53 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:27 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:30 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 12:44 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 10:06 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:51 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:02 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:01 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-31 05:12 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:41 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:08 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:49 -0700
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 15:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13B2373.492C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286380 |
On 3/27/15, 11:45 AM, in article mf48ed$uea$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>> I'd much rather go to www.ExpertsExchange.com than to >>>> www.ExpertSexChange.com >>> >>> I rest my case. >>> >> >> Got it - Signed, sealed and delivered. I signed mine with a nice desk pen >> that I bought at PenIsland.com >> >> Be careful or you'll end up at PenisLand.com > > If websites were case-sensitive, PenIsland.com and PenisLand.com could > essentially be two different domain name purchases and each company > wouldn't mind that the other existed. The fact that it is > case-insensitive actually lowers the amount of sales places like > GoDaddy.com make. Even worse: for most web hosts parts of the URL are case sensitive and other parts are not. > The case for case-sensitivity is a strong one, I must admit. On the > other hand, it makes browsing somewhat more cumbersome for the people > who can't be bothered to press the shift key which seems to be the > majority of people nowadays. They already have enough difficulty > spelling correctly, imagine the war we would start if we complained > about their grammar and punctuation as well! I think if we had PenIsIsland and PenisIsland people would get them confused. Now I am off to go look at NewsExposition.com and GraphicsExport.com. :) -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 15:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13B2504.492CF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286361 |
On 3/27/15, 10:18 AM, in article mf43b6$89a$1@dont-email.me, "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > > "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message > news:bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid... >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>> comment >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>> >>>> Never heard of that one. >>>> >>> LOL! >> >> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >> > > I'd much rather go to www.ExpertsExchange.com than to > www.ExpertSexChange.com Ever visit NewsExposition.com or GraphicsExport.com? :) -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 10:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13AE099.4928A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286357 |
On 3/27/15, 10:08 AM, in article bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment >>> >>> ... >>> >>> >>>> GeorgeTown University >>> >>> Never heard of that one. >>> >> LOL! > > So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? Why would I? -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 17:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhvye90.f3a0@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286365 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 3/27/15, 10:08 AM, in article bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>> >>>> Never heard of that one. >>>> >>> LOL! >> >> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? > Why would I? Because it doesn't exist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 04:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cfdc9567-630d-46a2-95e4-32685a54510c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #286324 |
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:11:17 PM UTC-4, Snit wrote: > It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment > about it an cc wanted to defend his unsupported claims. Uhh no. The comment was about people begging you to explain Objective-C and Swift to them. Which never ever happened. DFS happens to agree with you on case sensitivity. You're trying to circus away from your lies again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 08:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13EBBA2.49464%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286708 |
On 3/30/15, 4:30 AM, in article cfdc9567-630d-46a2-95e4-32685a54510c@googlegroups.com, "cc" <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:11:17 PM UTC-4, Snit wrote: >> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment >> about it an cc wanted to defend his unsupported claims. > > Uhh no. The comment was about people begging you to explain Objective-C > and Swift to them. Which never ever happened. DFS happens to agree > with you on case sensitivity. You're trying to circus away from your > lies again. 4580729c-5fa2-4d95-b1bd-02cd6e933bc5@googlegroups.com a458c822-5818-4add-9b47-e34d2e73e718@googlegroups.com Just two posts where you asked me questions about Objective-C and Swift. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 09:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <be578a4c-7973-4732-9ce6-d8e91cf8e814@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #286734 |
On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 11:36:58 AM UTC-4, Snit wrote: > On 3/30/15, 4:30 AM, in article > cfdc9567-630d-46a2-95e4-32685a54510c@googlegroups.com, "cc" > <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:11:17 PM UTC-4, Snit wrote: > >> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment > >> about it an cc wanted to defend his unsupported claims. > > > > Uhh no. The comment was about people begging you to explain Objective-C > > and Swift to them. Which never ever happened. DFS happens to agree > > with you on case sensitivity. You're trying to circus away from your > > lies again. > > 4580729c-5fa2-4d95-b1bd-02cd6e933bc5@googlegroups.com > a458c822-5818-4add-9b47-e34d2e73e718@googlegroups.com > > Just two posts where you asked me questions about Objective-C and Swift. > > LOL! If that's what you think, that would explain alot. A question mark at the end doesn't always means it's really a question, or that I don't have the answer. Literally no one else considers that asking questions about either language, and rightfully so. You're a strange bird with some serious comprehension issues, at least with the written word. Maybe you need facial cues, or maybe that doesn't help either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 09:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13EC5CC.49471%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286739 |
On 3/30/15, 9:06 AM, in article be578a4c-7973-4732-9ce6-d8e91cf8e814@googlegroups.com, "cc" <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 11:36:58 AM UTC-4, Snit wrote: >> On 3/30/15, 4:30 AM, in article >> cfdc9567-630d-46a2-95e4-32685a54510c@googlegroups.com, "cc" >> <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:11:17 PM UTC-4, Snit wrote: >>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment >>>> about it an cc wanted to defend his unsupported claims. >>> >>> Uhh no. The comment was about people begging you to explain Objective-C >>> and Swift to them. Which never ever happened. DFS happens to agree >>> with you on case sensitivity. You're trying to circus away from your >>> lies again. >> >> 4580729c-5fa2-4d95-b1bd-02cd6e933bc5@googlegroups.com >> a458c822-5818-4add-9b47-e34d2e73e718@googlegroups.com >> >> Just two posts where you asked me questions about Objective-C and Swift. >> >> > > LOL! If that's what you think, that would explain alot. A question > mark at the end doesn't always means it's really a question, or that > I don't have the answer. Literally no one else considers that > asking questions about either language, and rightfully so. You're a > strange bird with some serious comprehension issues, at least with > the written word. Maybe you need facial cues, or maybe that doesn't > help either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's move to it. You begged me to respond... over and over. You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY that. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 18:31 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mfbtnf$j64$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286741 |
Snit wrote: > On 3/30/15, 9:06 AM, in article > be578a4c-7973-4732-9ce6-d8e91cf8e814@googlegroups.com, "cc" > <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 11:36:58 AM UTC-4, Snit wrote: >>> On 3/30/15, 4:30 AM, in article >>> cfdc9567-630d-46a2-95e4-32685a54510c@googlegroups.com, "cc" >>> <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:11:17 PM UTC-4, Snit wrote: >>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>> comment about it an cc wanted to defend his unsupported claims. >>>> >>>> Uhh no. The comment was about people begging you to explain Objective-C >>>> and Swift to them. Which never ever happened. DFS happens to agree >>>> with you on case sensitivity. You're trying to circus away from your >>>> lies again. >>> >>> 4580729c-5fa2-4d95-b1bd-02cd6e933bc5@googlegroups.com The term "rhetorical question" does not tell you anything then >>> a458c822-5818-4add-9b47-e34d2e73e718@googlegroups.com Well, there he was shwoing that you are an incompetent idiot, with ho useable knowledge about programming whatsoever >>> Just two posts where you asked me questions about Objective-C and Swift. No, he was not. Even you with your incredible reading comprehension problems can't be *that* incompetent to take those posts as "questions about Objective-C and Swift" >>> >> >> LOL! If that's what you think, that would explain alot. A question >> mark at the end doesn't always means it's really a question, or that >> I don't have the answer. Literally no one else considers that >> asking questions about either language, and rightfully so. You're a >> strange bird with some serious comprehension issues, at least with >> the written word. Maybe you need facial cues, or maybe that doesn't >> help either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > > You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's move to it. You > begged me to respond... over and over. > > You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY that. > Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. You are thick as a brick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 09:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6f107c10-d6b9-4aa2-a45d-35dcb0eca68f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #286743 |
On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 12:31:34 PM UTC-4, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Snit wrote: > > > On 3/30/15, 9:06 AM, in article > > be578a4c-7973-4732-9ce6-d8e91cf8e814@googlegroups.com, "cc" > > <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 11:36:58 AM UTC-4, Snit wrote: > >>> On 3/30/15, 4:30 AM, in article > >>> cfdc9567-630d-46a2-95e4-32685a54510c@googlegroups.com, "cc" > >>> <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:11:17 PM UTC-4, Snit wrote: > >>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some > >>>>> comment about it an cc wanted to defend his unsupported claims. > >>>> > >>>> Uhh no. The comment was about people begging you to explain Objective-C > >>>> and Swift to them. Which never ever happened. DFS happens to agree > >>>> with you on case sensitivity. You're trying to circus away from your > >>>> lies again. > >>> > >>> 4580729c-5fa2-4d95-b1bd-02cd6e933bc5@googlegroups.com > > The term "rhetorical question" does not tell you anything then > > >>> a458c822-5818-4add-9b47-e34d2e73e718@googlegroups.com > > Well, there he was shwoing that you are an incompetent idiot, with ho > useable knowledge about programming whatsoever > > >>> Just two posts where you asked me questions about Objective-C and Swift. > > No, he was not. Even you with your incredible reading comprehension problems > can't be *that* incompetent to take those posts as "questions about > Objective-C and Swift" > > >>> > >> > >> LOL! If that's what you think, that would explain alot. A question > >> mark at the end doesn't always means it's really a question, or that > >> I don't have the answer. Literally no one else considers that > >> asking questions about either language, and rightfully so. You're a > >> strange bird with some serious comprehension issues, at least with > >> the written word. Maybe you need facial cues, or maybe that doesn't > >> help either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > > > > You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's move to it. You > > begged me to respond... over and over. > > > > You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY that. > > > > Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. You are thick > as a brick If that's what he thinks, that's what he thinks. It's possible that he's been incorrectly called a liar all these years and he's just a full on retard. Either that or he's just pretending to be retarded to cover up his lies. But either way...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 12:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bo0jhaplj9k9m9o5lo4rc96t7c147pquuv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #286743 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote: > some thing wrote: >> >> You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's move to it. You >> begged me to respond... over and over. >> >> You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY that. > >Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. You are thick >as a brick Like when that serial liar claimed that he was "*repeatedly* asked" how he was able to "find EXIF data on a jpg". In truth, he was not asked that even once, ever. But no one can show the thing lying. (rolling eyes). -- "I am *not* going to teach you how to find EXIF data. Go look it up." - some thing
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 20:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfcqnb$5iv$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286762 |
On 3/30/2015 1:23 PM, chrisv wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> some thing wrote: >>> >>> You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's move to it. You >>> begged me to respond... over and over. >>> >>> You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY that. >> >> Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. You are thick >> as a brick > > Like when that serial liar claimed that he was "*repeatedly* asked" > how he was able to "find EXIF data on a jpg". > > In truth, he was not asked that even once, ever. Ghost asked one time, but only /after/ the above Snit lie. Beginning of thread: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/iEUPUXurznUJ Ghost request: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/ALt_dPPgCewJ > But no one can show the thing lying. (rolling eyes).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 18:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <767732d8-e1ca-4273-9771-b1f1053e3cfa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #286883 |
On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 6:46:26 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 3/30/2015 1:23 PM, chrisv wrote: > > Peter Köhlmann wrote: > > > >> some thing wrote: > >>> > >>> You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's move to it. You > >>> begged me to respond... over and over. > >>> > >>> You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY that. > >> > >> Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. You are thick > >> as a brick > > > > Like when that serial liar claimed that he was "*repeatedly* asked" > > how he was able to "find EXIF data on a jpg". > > > > In truth, he was not asked that even once, ever. > > > Ghost asked one time, but only /after/ the above Snit lie. > > > Beginning of thread: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/iEUPUXurznUJ > > > Ghost request: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/ALt_dPPgCewJ I can show you a pretty funny Snit lie about a topic that is near and dear to his heart. It requires an email address you're comfortable using, though (it'll be obvious why as soon as you get a reply).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 23:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfd2m6$mto$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286893 |
On 3/30/2015 9:01 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 6:46:26 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >> On 3/30/2015 1:23 PM, chrisv wrote: >>> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> >>>> some thing wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's >>>>> move to it. You begged me to respond... over and over. >>>>> >>>>> You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY >>>>> that. >>>> >>>> Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. >>>> You are thick as a brick >>> >>> Like when that serial liar claimed that he was "*repeatedly* >>> asked" how he was able to "find EXIF data on a jpg". >>> >>> In truth, he was not asked that even once, ever. >> >> >> Ghost asked one time, but only /after/ the above Snit lie. >> >> >> Beginning of thread: >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/iEUPUXurznUJ >> >> >> >> >>Ghost request: >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/ALt_dPPgCewJ > >> >> > > I can show you a pretty funny Snit lie about a topic that is near > and dear to his heart. It requires an email address you're > comfortable using, though (it'll be obvious why as soon as you get a > reply). It's always interesting to see the ever-honest and honorable Snit caught up in a blatant lie, but I don't have such an email address. Why can't the lie be posted here?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 20:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13F5E54.4954B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286905 |
On 3/30/15, 8:01 PM, in article mfd2m6$mto$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 3/30/2015 9:01 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 6:46:26 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>> On 3/30/2015 1:23 PM, chrisv wrote: >>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> >>>>> some thing wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's >>>>>> move to it. You begged me to respond... over and over. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY >>>>>> that. >>>>> >>>>> Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. >>>>> You are thick as a brick >>>> >>>> Like when that serial liar claimed that he was "*repeatedly* >>>> asked" how he was able to "find EXIF data on a jpg". >>>> >>>> In truth, he was not asked that even once, ever. >>> >>> >>> Ghost asked one time, but only /after/ the above Snit lie. >>> >>> >>> Beginning of thread: >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90Dr >>> I/iEUPUXurznUJ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Ghost request: >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90Dr >>> I/ALt_dPPgCewJ >> >>> >>> >> >> I can show you a pretty funny Snit lie about a topic that is near >> and dear to his heart. It requires an email address you're >> comfortable using, though (it'll be obvious why as soon as you get a >> reply). > > > It's always interesting to see the ever-honest and honorable Snit caught > up in a blatant lie, but I don't have such an email address. > > Why can't the lie be posted here? > Ah, the lies that cannot be quoted. Shove it up your ass. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 21:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e56acf23-1445-4240-a8df-4fe2bdac6ed1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #286905 |
On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 9:02:21 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 3/30/2015 9:01 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 6:46:26 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >> On 3/30/2015 1:23 PM, chrisv wrote: > >>> Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >>> > >>>> some thing wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's > >>>>> move to it. You begged me to respond... over and over. > >>>>> > >>>>> You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY > >>>>> that. > >>>> > >>>> Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. > >>>> You are thick as a brick > >>> > >>> Like when that serial liar claimed that he was "*repeatedly* > >>> asked" how he was able to "find EXIF data on a jpg". > >>> > >>> In truth, he was not asked that even once, ever. > >> > >> > >> Ghost asked one time, but only /after/ the above Snit lie. > >> > >> > >> Beginning of thread: > >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/iEUPUXurznUJ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Ghost request: > >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/ALt_dPPgCewJ > > > >> > >> > > > > I can show you a pretty funny Snit lie about a topic that is near > > and dear to his heart. It requires an email address you're > > comfortable using, though (it'll be obvious why as soon as you get a > > reply). > > > It's always interesting to see the ever-honest and honorable Snit caught > up in a blatant lie, but I don't have such an email address. This one is definitely blatant... and a whopper IMO. > Why can't the lie be posted here? It just can't be. I think it's worth drumming up a temporary, anonymous email account: https://securemail.hidemyass.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 19:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13F4FFE.4953C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286883 |
On 3/30/15, 5:45 PM, in article mfcqnb$5iv$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 3/30/2015 1:23 PM, chrisv wrote: >> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> some thing wrote: >>>> >>>> You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's move to it. You >>>> begged me to respond... over and over. >>>> >>>> You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY that. >>> >>> Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. You are thick >>> as a brick >> >> Like when that serial liar claimed that he was "*repeatedly* asked" >> how he was able to "find EXIF data on a jpg". >> >> In truth, he was not asked that even once, ever. > > > Ghost asked one time, but only /after/ the above Snit lie. > > > Beginning of thread: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/ > iEUPUXurznUJ > > > Ghost request: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/ > ALt_dPPgCewJ > > >> But no one can show the thing lying. (rolling eyes). > > Looking through the thread we see: * Me goofing on a date (typed 28 when I meant 26). * Called on the goof and admitted it with no problem. * Tattoo Vampire referencing his lies about me calling him. * Tattoo Vampire denying I could know the data a picture he posted was taken. I told him "EXIF. Look it up." * Tattoo did not understand what I meant "Nice try, but you're still full of it, Splut." * Tattoo asked me to post a screenshot of it! "And of course you can use your great tech skills to post a screenshot of said data?" He had no idea what it was! * Peter Köhlmann shows HE cannot find it either. "Well, it *will* be good. Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser will muster all his forging skills. After all, he will provide "proof" of data which is not even present in those pictures" To be fair, it is possible Tattoo had replaced the file before Peter's comment. But at the very least, Tattoo at the start CLEARLY did not know about it. And Peter denied the original file had it. So Tattoo lied about me calling him and showed ignorance of EXIF data. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 23:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfd2o2$mto$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286899 |
On 3/30/2015 10:09 PM, Snit wrote: > On 3/30/15, 5:45 PM, in article mfcqnb$5iv$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" > <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >> On 3/30/2015 1:23 PM, chrisv wrote: >>> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> >>>> some thing wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You repeatedly asked me questions about Swift and Apple's move to it. You >>>>> begged me to respond... over and over. >>>>> >>>>> You can deny and twist all you want... but you did EXACTLY that. >>>> >>>> Nope. You simply can't understand simple sentences. Thats all. You are thick >>>> as a brick >>> >>> Like when that serial liar claimed that he was "*repeatedly* asked" >>> how he was able to "find EXIF data on a jpg". >>> >>> In truth, he was not asked that even once, ever. >> >> >> Ghost asked one time, but only /after/ the above Snit lie. >> >> >> Beginning of thread: >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/ >> iEUPUXurznUJ >> >> >> Ghost request: >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/ >> ALt_dPPgCewJ >> >> >>> But no one can show the thing lying. (rolling eyes). >> >> > Looking through the thread we see: Oh no we don't. > * Me goofing on a date (typed 28 when I meant 26). > * Called on the goof and admitted it with no problem. > * Tattoo Vampire referencing his lies about me calling him. > * Tattoo Vampire denying I could know the data a picture > he posted was taken. I told him "EXIF. Look it up." > * Tattoo did not understand what I meant > "Nice try, but you're still full of it, Splut." > * Tattoo asked me to post a screenshot of it! > "And of course you can use your great tech skills to post a > screenshot of said data?" He had no idea what it was! > * Peter Köhlmann shows HE cannot find it either. > "Well, it *will* be good. Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser will > muster all his forging skills. After all, he will provide "proof" > of data which is not even present in those pictures" > > To be fair, it is possible Tattoo had replaced the file before Peter's > comment. But at the very least, Tattoo at the start CLEARLY did not know > about it. And Peter denied the original file had it. > > So Tattoo lied about me calling him and showed ignorance of EXIF data. You see all that. I see some of that. The parts I don't see are the bullshit lies you just now made up to cover for your childish inability to admit you were ignorant about EXIF data 6.5 years ago. It's amazing how immature and dishonest and desperate you are about this. Do you act like this in real life?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 20:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13F5E3A.4954A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286907 |
On 3/30/15, 8:02 PM, in article mfd2o2$mto$4@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: ... >> Looking through the thread we see: > > Oh no we don't. Don't what? >> * Me goofing on a date (typed 28 when I meant 26). >> * Called on the goof and admitted it with no problem. >> * Tattoo Vampire referencing his lies about me calling him. >> * Tattoo Vampire denying I could know the data a picture >> he posted was taken. I told him "EXIF. Look it up." >> * Tattoo did not understand what I meant >> "Nice try, but you're still full of it, Splut." >> * Tattoo asked me to post a screenshot of it! >> "And of course you can use your great tech skills to post a >> screenshot of said data?" He had no idea what it was! >> * Peter Köhlmann shows HE cannot find it either. >> "Well, it *will* be good. Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser will >> muster all his forging skills. After all, he will provide "proof" >> of data which is not even present in those pictures" >> >> To be fair, it is possible Tattoo had replaced the file before Peter's >> comment. But at the very least, Tattoo at the start CLEARLY did not know >> about it. And Peter denied the original file had it. >> >> So Tattoo lied about me calling him and showed ignorance of EXIF data. > > > You see all that. > > I see some of that. Who cares? Really... why should I care. You have made it clear you are on a witch hunt to FINALLY catch me in some lie. I even provide specific quotes on much of it... though no links. Oh well. Long dead debate I could not care less about. > The parts I don't see are the bullshit lies you just now made up to > cover for your childish inability to admit you were ignorant about EXIF > data 6.5 years ago. Quote these lies. And remember, SHOW whatever you quote is a lie. Oh. You can't. > It's amazing how immature and dishonest and desperate you are about > this. Do you act like this in real life? Really, at this point just shove your obsession and your accusations up your ass. I rarely sink to such nonsense but you are clearly being just stupid. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 09:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfe7s1$a31$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286909 |
On 3/30/2015 11:10 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 3/30/15, 8:02 PM, in article mfd2o2$mto$4@dont-email.me, "DFS"
> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>>> Looking through the thread we see:
>>
>> Oh no we don't.
>
> Don't what?
"We" don't see what you claim "we" see.
>>> * Me goofing on a date (typed 28 when I meant 26).
>>> * Called on the goof and admitted it with no problem.
>>> * Tattoo Vampire referencing his lies about me calling him.
>>> * Tattoo Vampire denying I could know the data a picture
>>> he posted was taken. I told him "EXIF. Look it up."
>>> * Tattoo did not understand what I meant
>>> "Nice try, but you're still full of it, Splut."
>>> * Tattoo asked me to post a screenshot of it!
>>> "And of course you can use your great tech skills to post a
>>> screenshot of said data?" He had no idea what it was!
>>> * Peter Köhlmann shows HE cannot find it either.
>>> "Well, it *will* be good. Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser will
>>> muster all his forging skills. After all, he will provide "proof"
>>> of data which is not even present in those pictures"
>>>
>>> To be fair, it is possible Tattoo had replaced the file before Peter's
>>> comment.
He never replaced the files. That was another of your lies.
>>>> But at the very least, Tattoo at the start CLEARLY did not know
>>> about it.
Not CLEARLY, and irrelevant if true.
What we CLEARLY know is you claimed files without EXIF data had EXIF
data. Then you went on a kiddie rampage rather than admit your
ignorance/confusion/mistake.
Rather than laugh it off ("I got confused" or "Whoops I was wrong") you
started up with the lying and word-twisting and wrongly accusing
advocates of bad conduct, etc.
It was really a pathetic display.
Begins:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/w9pWSa90DrI/iEUPUXurznUJ
>>>> And Peter denied the original file had it.
It didn't, so when he denied it he was telling the truth.
You weren't.
>>> So Tattoo lied about me calling him and showed ignorance of EXIF data.
He may have lied about you calling him (he never showed any evidence),
but he sure didn't show evidence of ignorance of EXIF data.
>> You see all that.
>>
>> I see some of that.
>
> Who cares? Really... why should I care. You have made it clear you are on a
> witch hunt to FINALLY catch me in some lie.
Finally? I caught you in lies years ago, almost immediately after I
started closely reading a couple of your circus threads.
I used to gloss over them, because you like to split hairs and argue
minutiae.
> I even provide specific quotes
> on much of it... though no links. Oh well.
>
> Long dead debate I could not care less about.
Another lie. If you don't care, why did you just post a long recap of
(your twisting misinterpretation) of the entire thread?
>> The parts I don't see are the bullshit lies you just now made up to
>> cover for your childish inability to admit you were ignorant about EXIF
>> data 6.5 years ago.
>
> Quote these lies. And remember, SHOW whatever you quote is a lie.
>
> Oh.
>
> You can't.
Fresh lies: "Tattoo did not understand what I meant." and "He had no
idea what it was!"
He knew exactly what you meant by 'EXIF. Look it up.', as one of his
next comments reveals:
========================================================================
"Wrong, my foot, you were lying your ass off. There was no EXIF data
there to read, period.
In your vanity you assumed most people wouldn't know what EXIF data was,
including me. You were figuring I'd panic or something, I guess. Instead
you were caught with your pants down, Splat.
How does that crow taste, Prescott "Computer" Guy?"
========================================================================
Apparently that crow tasted bad, as you went into a tizzy.
>> It's amazing how immature and dishonest and desperate you are about
>> this. Do you act like this in real life?
>
>
> Really, at this point just shove your obsession and your accusations up your
> ass. I rarely sink to such nonsense but you are clearly being just stupid.
See how crazy you get when you're backed into a corner by your own lies
and dishonest behavior?
Unfortunately, it looks like you haven't changed at all since that EXIF
thread, in Aug 2008.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web