Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286324 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-26 19:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-03-31 10:49 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 143 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 19:11 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 04:10 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 21:45 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:08 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 13:14 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:16 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:36 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 18:44 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:14 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:35 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:59 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-27 13:23 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:40 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:11 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 13:18 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:21 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 13:44 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:46 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 13:52 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 18:01 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:45 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 18:58 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 15:05 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 19:13 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:16 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:32 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:43 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:55 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 16:01 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:14 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 16:47 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 00:32 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 18:08 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 01:21 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 18:30 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 01:50 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 22:54 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 20:02 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 23:22 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-28 09:03 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 13:13 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 13:42 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 14:17 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:13 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 12:23 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 19:38 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 19:59 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 21:51 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 18:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 09:06 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 15:51 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 11:22 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 12:48 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 14:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 11:14 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 11:17 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-28 23:12 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 18:55 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:11 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 19:20 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 00:29 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-28 23:38 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 19:43 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 23:51 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:45 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:00 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-29 16:14 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:42 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 12:41 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 16:59 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-29 13:03 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 03:45 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 03:54 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 07:00 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:27 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 20:56 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 21:13 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:21 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:46 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 01:28 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:25 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:47 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 16:42 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-28 19:44 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 09:13 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:45 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 22:40 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:43 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 09:51 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:22 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-28 18:49 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-28 09:47 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 14:15 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 09:49 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:02 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 11:52 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 10:16 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 15:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:10 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:17 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 10:25 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:29 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:30 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:36 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:06 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 09:20 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 18:31 +0200
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:36 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 12:23 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:45 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:01 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:01 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 20:11 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 21:58 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:09 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 20:10 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:36 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:13 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:35 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:32 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 07:34 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:22 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 08:45 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:16 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-04 20:00 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-04 18:42 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 08:48 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 08:53 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:27 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:30 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 12:44 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 10:06 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:51 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:02 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:01 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-31 05:12 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:41 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:08 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:49 -0700
Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 19:11 -0700 |
| Subject | The stupid case sensitivity debate |
| Message-ID | <D13A0A4C.4924D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment
about it an cc wanted to defend his unsupported claims. Without rehashing it
a million times, this is what was found in the past (with one bullet pointed
added to the "case sensitivity" side in this current rehashing of this old
debate.
If someone thinks I am missing some evidence let me know... I will add it.
For either side. But currently it seems MASSIVELY one sides.
In support of case insensitivity:
* every college we can find
* every university we can find
* every source found through Google Scholar
* and even every blogger - mind boggling to see such agreement
* a whole list of specific affects to back the view
In support of case sensitivity:
* a language designed to be backward compatible with C is a lot like C!
* popular equals best: go QWERTY and teaspoons (in the U.S)!
* code snippets showing case sensitivity can be used
* makes interfacing with other common languages.
If you think I left some out please let me know what they are.
From an older post:
--------
* Every college and university found to take a stance on the issue
(I have provided full links elsewhere - if you want them just ask):
Clark Atlanta University
Dublin City University
Eastern Michigan University
GeorgeTown University
Ithaca College
Michigan State University
Purdue University
Southeastern Louisiana University
Southern Illinois University
University of Hawaii
University of Maine
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Virginia Tech
Western Michigan University
* Every source found through Google Scholar:
Advanced CORBA(R) Programming with C++
Essential C++ by Jarrell C. Grout, Robert G. Strader,
and John B. Hanks
<http://goo.gl/2AR9ZF>
The case for Ada at the USAF academy
Abstract available here:
<http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=958430>
* Every blogger writing about the topic:
<http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=110>
<http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=114>
<http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1114>
<http://goo.gl/g8FbNF>
<http://goo.gl/5zT2Cn>
Now of course the final categories, bloggers, are less authoritative than
the other two, but it is truly amazing how there is not a single
counter-example that has been shown in *any* of the categories. I expected
to find *some* reference disagreeing... and still expect I or someone else
will.
And if this does happen you can bet that one source will be deemed by those
who find it convenient to trump all the others. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------
And the links for the colleges I refer to above (and from another post):
---------------------------------------------------------------
<http://www.cs.georgetown.edu/~mahe/252/notes/ch5.ppt>
<http://www.ithaca.edu/barr/Student/CS321/Slides/Ch5.ppt>
<https://cs.wmich.edu/~gupta/teaching/cs4850/sumII07/lecture%20notes/lec06-7
%20names%20bindings%20type-checking%20scope%200713-071607.pdf>
<http://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/galkadi/401/notes/chapter5.d
oc>
<http://www.cis.cau.edu/courses/476/ppt/pl10ch5.ppt >
-----
Case sensitivity
- Disadvantage: readability (names that look alike are different)
* Names in the C-based languages are case sensitive
* Names in others are not
* Worse in C++, Java, and C# because predefined names are mixed
case (e.g. IndexOutOfBoundsException)
-----
<http://www.cse.msu.edu/~cse452/Fall2004/Lectures/04-binding.ppt>
-----
Case sensitivity
* Disadvantage:
- readability (names that look alike are different)
- writability (must remember exact spelling)
-----
<http://www.emunix.emich.edu/~evett/ProgrammingLanguages/LectureNotes/ProgLa
ng4.pdf>
<http://courses.cs.vt.edu/~cs3304/Spring00/notes/Chapter-4/Names.pdf>
<http://www2.cs.siu.edu/~rahimi/cs311/slides/Ch05.ppt>
-----
* Disadvantage: readability (names that look alike are different)
* Worse in Modula-2 because predefined names are mixed case (e.g.
WriteCard)
* C, C++, Ja va, and Modula-2 names are case sensitive
* The names in other languages are not
-----
<http://www2.hawaii.edu/~janst/313/slides/5.1%20Scope.ppt>
-----
* Disadvantage: readability
- names that look alike are different
* C++ and Java: predefined names are mixed case
- e.g. IndexOutOfBoundsException)
* Effects on writability?
-----
<http://www.csee.umbc.edu/courses/331/spring03/0101/lectures/finin5.ppt>
-----
* The first languages only had upper case
* Case sensitivity was probably introduced by Unix and hence C.
* Disadvantage:
Poor readability, since names that look alike to a human are
different
* Advantages:
Larger namespace
Ability to use case to signify classes of variables
(e.g., make constants be in uppercase)
-----
<http://computing.dcu.ie/~humphrys/Notes/UNIX/intro.html>
-----
Is case sensitivity a good thing? Or is it a flaw in UNIX (and
C/C++)?
Advantages of case sensitivity:
* More readable code. You know what to expect.
* More variables. num and NUM and Num
* Set up conventions, so that NUM probably refers to a
compile-time-coded constant, num is a real-time-changing
variable, etc. Quicker/simpler searches on file lists, since can
just search for the literal string.
* Better to be case-sensitive for passwords. - Larger space to
pick from. Harder to guess. Good to be "unforgiving" for security.
Not much return for such huge disadvantages:
* Millions of programmer and user hours lost on case not right.
* UNIX web servers everywhere have constant log of "404 Not Found"
which are really hits from people who noted a URL by hand and
didn't know it should be case sensitive. (Web server should
really have some logic to redirect of course.)
-----
<http://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/galkadi/401/notes/chapter5.d
oc>
<https://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/sbarakat/cs456/456-07-4up.pdf>
-----
Case sensitivity
- Disadvantage: readability (names that look alike are different)
* Worse in C++ and Java because predefined names are mixed case
(e.g. IndexOutOfBoundsException)
* In C, however, exclusive use of lowercase for names.
- C, C++, and Java names are case sensitive -> rose, Rose, ROSE
are distinct names "What about Readability"
------
<http://umcs.maine.edu/~cmeadow/courses/cos301/cos301-5.pdf>
-----
* Case sensitive languages have a readability issue: names that
look alike are different
* Case sensitive languages that do not require variable
declarations also have a writability issue: it's too easy to
accidentally create a new variable
-----
Ouch. Come on, the consensus in COLA *must* be supported somewhere, right?
This is just getting silly - I truly am shocked not a single source can be
found in support of case sensitivity. Not at all what I expected.
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 04:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286324 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment ... > GeorgeTown University Never heard of that one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-26 21:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13A2E92.4925F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286334 |
On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment > > ... > > >> GeorgeTown University > > Never heard of that one. > LOL! -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 17:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286335 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment >> >> ... >> >> >>> GeorgeTown University >> >> Never heard of that one. >> > LOL! So, are you going to remove it from the list or not?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 13:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf4339$6mt$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286357 |
On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment >>> >>> ... >>> >>> >>>> GeorgeTown University >>> >>> Never heard of that one. >>> >> LOL! > > So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason to remove it. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 17:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhv893.axx3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286359 |
Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: > On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>> >>>> Never heard of that one. >>>> >>> LOL! >> >> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? > Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA > sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason > to remove it. Georgetown is a real university. GeorgeTown is not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 14:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf47ts$s86$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286360 |
On 2015-03-27 1:16 PM, owl wrote: > Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >> On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>> >>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>> >>>> LOL! >>> >>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? > >> Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA >> sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason >> to remove it. > > Georgetown is a real university. GeorgeTown is not. Oh, dear Lord. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 18:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bh3a3ra3hfr.r@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286374 |
Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: > On 2015-03-27 1:16 PM, owl wrote: >> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>> On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some comment >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>>> >>>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>> >>>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >> >>> Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA >>> sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason >>> to remove it. >> >> Georgetown is a real university. GeorgeTown is not. > Oh, dear Lord. If you think they're the same I propose that you spell it "GeorgeTown" in your admission application essay. My guess is that they would suggest that "John Hopkins" might be a better fit for you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 15:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13B245C.492CB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286360 |
On 3/27/15, 10:16 AM, in article bhv893.axx3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >> On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>>> comment >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>> >>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>> >>>> LOL! >>> >>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? > >> Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA >> sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason >> to remove it. > > Georgetown is a real university. GeorgeTown is not. > Yet on their site they use GEORGETOWN a lot. And you knew what I meant. And keep in mind the evidence you got that name from... it was overwhelming and the "counter" has been pretty much NOTHING. In support of case insensitivity: * every college we can find * every university we can find * every source found through Google Scholar * and even every blogger - mind boggling to see such agreement * a whole list of specific affects to back the view In support of case sensitivity: * a language designed to be backward compatible with C is a lot like C! * popular equals best: go QWERTY and teaspoons (in the U.S)! * code snippets showing case sensitivity can be used * makes interfacing with other common languages. If you think I left some out please let me know what they are. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 22:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhf0.03afw@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286407 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 3/27/15, 10:16 AM, in article bhv893.axx3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>> On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>>>> comment >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>>> >>>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>> >>>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >> >>> Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA >>> sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason >>> to remove it. >> >> Georgetown is a real university. GeorgeTown is not. >> > Yet on their site they use GEORGETOWN a lot. They only use it in titles and headings. Nowhere do they refer to themselves as "GeorgeTown." And as I told Slimer, I would not advise spelling it that way on an admissions application essay unless you want your application rejected. > And you knew what I meant. I know you self-nuked, and if was fucking hilarious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 15:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13B2EF9.492DF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286411 |
On 3/27/15, 3:35 PM, in article bhf0.03afw@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 3/27/15, 10:16 AM, in article bhv893.axx3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>> On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>>>>> comment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>>>> >>>>>> LOL! >>>>> >>>>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >>> >>>> Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA >>>> sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason >>>> to remove it. >>> >>> Georgetown is a real university. GeorgeTown is not. >>> > >> Yet on their site they use GEORGETOWN a lot. > > They only use it in titles and headings. And their logo. What percent do you think this confuses? > Nowhere do they refer to themselves as "GeorgeTown." And as I told Slimer, I > would not advise spelling it that way on an admissions application essay > unless you want your application rejected. > >> And you knew what I meant. > > I know you self-nuked, and if was fucking hilarious. It showed that an error in case is still understood by humans. I did not make the error on purpose... but wish I had. :) -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 13:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf43m3$9er$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286359 |
On 3/27/2015 1:14 PM, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>> comment >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>> >>>> Never heard of that one. >>>> >>> LOL! >> >> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? > > Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA > sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason > to remove it. Hint: look at the spelling owl referenced, then look at the Subject line.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 14:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf485q$tb2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286363 |
On 2015-03-27 1:23 PM, DFS wrote: > On 3/27/2015 1:14 PM, Slimer wrote: >> On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>>> comment >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>> >>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>> >>>> LOL! >>> >>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >> >> Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA >> sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason >> to remove it. > > Hint: look at the spelling owl referenced, then look at the Subject line. Except that it is essentially impossible not to understand which school Snit was referencing despite the slight difference in case. Whether you write it as Georgetown or GeorgeTown, the city cited is the same. In fact, I would go as far as to say that the GeorgeTown casing is a lot more appropriate considering it is a Town which was originally called George and became known as Georgetown with time. Either way, what a stupid debate. I respectfully withdraw from it and retract any statements I've made in the past in support of case-insensitivity. Clearly, it's ideal in some areas. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 15:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D13B23B9.492C9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #286375 |
On 3/27/15, 11:40 AM, in article mf485q$tb2$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: > On 2015-03-27 1:23 PM, DFS wrote: >> On 3/27/2015 1:14 PM, Slimer wrote: >>> On 2015-03-27 1:08 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>>>> comment >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>>> >>>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>> >>>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >>> >>> Dude, Georgetown is a real university. I don't give a shit about NCAA >>> sports but even *I* have heard of the Georgetown Hoyas. He has no reason >>> to remove it. >> >> Hint: look at the spelling owl referenced, then look at the Subject line. > > Except that it is essentially impossible not to understand which school > Snit was referencing despite the slight difference in case. Whether you > write it as Georgetown or GeorgeTown, the city cited is the same. In > fact, I would go as far as to say that the GeorgeTown casing is a lot > more appropriate considering it is a Town which was originally called > George and became known as Georgetown with time. I made a mistake with case. And no sane person would be confused. A great example! > Either way, what a stupid debate. I respectfully withdraw from it and > retract any statements I've made in the past in support of > case-insensitivity. Clearly, it's ideal in some areas. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 13:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf43b6$89a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286357 |
"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message news:bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid... > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>> comment >>> >>> ... >>> >>> >>>> GeorgeTown University >>> >>> Never heard of that one. >>> >> LOL! > > So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? > I'd much rather go to www.ExpertsExchange.com than to www.ExpertSexChange.com -- The iPad might give Apple a black eye. I think Jobs is just too arrogant to admit that he made a mistake not getting into the netbook market - so now he's compounding the mistake by trying to use a failed (tablet) platform to compete against a successful one. RonB demonstrating why he's known as WRonG <hkl0ug$8du$7@news.eternal-september.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 17:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhvu9.3q3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286361 |
Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message > news:bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid... >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>> comment >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>> >>>> Never heard of that one. >>>> >>> LOL! >> >> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >> > I'd much rather go to www.ExpertsExchange.com than to > www.ExpertSexChange.com I rest my case.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 13:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf44rl$fem$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286362 |
"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message news:bhvu9.3q3@rooftop.invalid... > Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > >> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message >> news:bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid... >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>>> comment >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>> >>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>> >>>> LOL! >>> >>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >>> > >> I'd much rather go to www.ExpertsExchange.com than to >> www.ExpertSexChange.com > > I rest my case. > Got it - Signed, sealed and delivered. I signed mine with a nice desk pen that I bought at PenIsland.com Be careful or you'll end up at PenisLand.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 17:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhvu03.00@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286368 |
Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message > news:bhvu9.3q3@rooftop.invalid... >> Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: >> >>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid... >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>>>> comment >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>>> >>>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>> >>>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >>>> >> >>> I'd much rather go to www.ExpertsExchange.com than to >>> www.ExpertSexChange.com >> >> I rest my case. >> > Got it - Signed, sealed and delivered. I signed mine with a nice desk pen > that I bought at PenIsland.com > Be careful or you'll end up at PenisLand.com lol
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 13:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf459j$h7t$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286369 |
"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message news:bhvu03.00@rooftop.invalid... > Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > >> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message >> news:bhvu9.3q3@rooftop.invalid... >>> Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid... >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>>>>> comment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>>>> >>>>>> LOL! >>>>> >>>>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >>>>> >>> >>>> I'd much rather go to www.ExpertsExchange.com than to >>>> www.ExpertSexChange.com >>> >>> I rest my case. >>> > >> Got it - Signed, sealed and delivered. I signed mine with a nice desk pen >> that I bought at PenIsland.com > >> Be careful or you'll end up at PenisLand.com > > lol If you think that's funny then you need help. I recommend a therapist. You can find a therapist at www.TherapistFinder.com But don't confuse that site with www.TheRapistFinder.com - they're not the same.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-27 18:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhvdu93fa.33@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286370 |
Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message > news:bhvu03.00@rooftop.invalid... >> Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: >> >>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:bhvu9.3q3@rooftop.invalid... >>>> Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:bhfue9.3ofe@rooftop.invalid... >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/26/15, 9:10 PM, in article vbhd0.3q@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> It has resurfaced. Why, who knows? DFS wanted to troll me over some >>>>>>>>> comment >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> GeorgeTown University >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Never heard of that one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL! >>>>>> >>>>>> So, are you going to remove it from the list or not? >>>>>> >>>> >>>>> I'd much rather go to www.ExpertsExchange.com than to >>>>> www.ExpertSexChange.com >>>> >>>> I rest my case. >>>> >> >>> Got it - Signed, sealed and delivered. I signed mine with a nice desk pen >>> that I bought at PenIsland.com >> >>> Be careful or you'll end up at PenisLand.com >> >> lol > If you think that's funny then you need help. I recommend a therapist. > You can find a therapist at www.TherapistFinder.com > But don't confuse that site with www.TheRapistFinder.com - they're not the > same. Thanks for that excellent pro-case-sensitivity argument.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web