Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #440362 > unrolled thread

Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2017-11-15 14:28 +0000
    Hobbyware on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers - we are doomed Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2017-11-15 06:42 -0800
      Re: Hobbyware on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers - we are doomed Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-11-15 14:48 +0000
    Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-11-15 08:52 -0600
      Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2017-11-15 18:13 +0000
        Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-11-15 11:24 -0700
        Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Doomsdrzej <dre@do.om> - 2017-11-15 17:16 -0500
        Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2017-11-15 17:08 -0800
          Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-11-16 01:28 +0000
            Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-11-16 01:42 +0000
            Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2017-11-15 21:08 -0800
              Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-11-16 05:37 +0000
                Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2017-11-15 22:13 -0800
                  Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-11-16 06:42 +0000
                    Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2017-11-15 23:09 -0800
                      Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-11-16 09:13 +0000
          Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-11-16 01:40 +0000
            Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-11-16 07:29 -0600
              Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-11-16 12:16 -0600
      Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2017-11-18 09:42 -0800
    Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers fr314159@gmail.com - 2017-11-15 09:55 -0800
      Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-11-15 11:04 -0700
      Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-11-15 10:29 -0800
        Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-11-15 23:49 +0000
          Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-11-15 16:10 -0800
    Re: Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2017-11-16 20:41 +0000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#440362 — Linux on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers

Not bad for "hobbyware."

~~
It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
are running Linux.
...

Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.

The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
...
~~
http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#440363 — Hobbyware on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers - we are doomed

On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 at 11:28:47 PM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
> Not bad for "hobbyware."
> 
> ~~
> It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
> are running Linux.
> ...

The end of World when it gets controlled by a buggy hobbyware written by underpaid smelly geeks and drug addicts....

> Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
> first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
> All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
> 
> The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
> running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
> ...
> ~~
> http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
> 
> -- 
> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440365 — Re: Hobbyware on 500 of Top 500 Supercomputers - we are doomed

On 2017-11-15, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 at 11:28:47 PM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
>> Not bad for "hobbyware."
>> 
>> ~~
>> It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>> are running Linux.
>> ...
>
> The end of World when it gets controlled by a buggy hobbyware written
> by underpaid smelly geeks and drug addicts....

Hobbyware is less buggy then comercialware...

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440367

RonB wrote:

>Not bad for "hobbyware."
>
>~~
>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>are running Linux.
>...
>
>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>
>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>...
>~~
>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 

I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
"one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!

As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
strength was actually a weakness!

-- 
"It's called Distro hell. This choice thing is a joke."  -  "True
Linux advocate" Hadron Quark 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440375

On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> RonB wrote:
>
>>Not bad for "hobbyware."
>>
>>~~
>>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>>are running Linux.
>>...
>>
>>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
>>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
>>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>>
>>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
>>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>>...
>>~~
>>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
>
> I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
> supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
> versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
> "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
>
> As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
> infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
> strength was actually a weakness!

Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440376

On 11/15/17, 11:13 AM, in article oui03g$hec$1@dont-email.me, "RonB"
<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> RonB wrote:
>> 
>>> Not bad for "hobbyware."
>>> 
>>> ~~
>>> It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers
>>> are running Linux.
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux
>>> first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened:
>>> All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>>> 
>>> The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers
>>> running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>>> ...
>>> ~~
>>> http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/
>> 
>> I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
>> supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
>> versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
>> "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
>> 
>> As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
>> infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
>> strength was actually a weakness!
> 
> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal
> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works."

Not sure what you want it to "count" for? I say it is great that Linux can
be used, even in a modified for, for such things. Does ANYONE disagree?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440383

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:13:05 -0000 (UTC), RonB
<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> RonB wrote:
>>
>>>Not bad for "hobbyware."
>>>
>>>~~
>>>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>>>are running Linux.
>>>...
>>>
>>>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
>>>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
>>>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>>>
>>>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
>>>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>>>...
>>>~~
>>>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
>>
>> I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
>> supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
>> versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
>> "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
>>
>> As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
>> infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
>> strength was actually a weakness!
>
>Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
>anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 


The fact that it is used on supercomputers is a testament to the fact
that it does the job and gets out of the way of anyone who wants to
use it. The operating system can be as much or as little as the owners
of a supercomputer want it to be and that is probably one of the main
reasons why it was selected over Windows which isn't as versatile.

Additionally, an article came out today showing that on the same
mobile hardware, Windows will divide your potential performance by a
factor of about 4. It probably didn't perform as well on those
supercomputers as Linux either. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440393

On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> > RonB wrote:
> >
> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
> >>
> >>~~
> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
> >>are running Linux.
> >>...
> >>
> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
> >>
> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
> >>...
> >>~~
> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
> >
> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
> >
> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
> > strength was actually a weakness!
> 
> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
> 
> -- 
> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just stealing the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away with it unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or nuclear silos).  The end of World is night.

At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took good use of that....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440396

Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
>> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> > RonB wrote:
>> >
>> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
>> >>
>> >>~~
>> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>> >>are running Linux.
>> >>...
>> >>
>> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
>> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
>> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>> >>
>> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
>> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>> >>...
>> >>~~
>> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
>> >
>> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
>> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
>> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
>> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
>> >
>> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
>> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
>> > strength was actually a weakness!
>> 
>> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
>> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
>> 
>> -- 
>> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
> 
> Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just stealing the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away with it unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or nuclear silos).  The end of World is night.
> 
> At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took good use of that....

The *only* reason Apple chose BSD is because of the license.  This is
Microsoft's dilemma.  At some point Windoze will be either Linux or BSD.
Linux is better, but BSD lets you close the source after adding trojan.
What to do... what to do...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440398

On 2017-11-16, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
>>> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> > RonB wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
>>> >>
>>> >>~~
>>> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>>> >>are running Linux.
>>> >>...
>>> >>
>>> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
>>> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
>>> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>>> >>
>>> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
>>> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>>> >>...
>>> >>~~
>>> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
>>> >
>>> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
>>> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
>>> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
>>> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
>>> >
>>> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
>>> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
>>> > strength was actually a weakness!
>>> 
>>> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
>>> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
>> 
>> Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly
>> customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because
>> the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good
>> ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting
>> more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just
>> stealing the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away
>> with it unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or
>> nuclear silos).  The end of World is night.
>> 
>> At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people
>> naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took
>> good use of that....
>
> The *only* reason Apple chose BSD is because of the license.  This is
> Microsoft's dilemma.  At some point Windoze will be either Linux or
> BSD.  Linux is better, but BSD lets you close the source after adding
> trojan.  What to do... what to do...
>
BSD stands for `bad software distribution` ;)
I heard that on IRC once ;)
BSD is unstable crap.

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440400

On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 10:28:20 AM UTC+9, owl wrote:
> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
> >> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >> > RonB wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
> >> >>
> >> >>~~
> >> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
> >> >>are running Linux.
> >> >>...
> >> >>
> >> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
> >> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
> >> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
> >> >>
> >> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
> >> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
> >> >>...
> >> >>~~
> >> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
> >> >
> >> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
> >> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
> >> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
> >> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
> >> >
> >> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
> >> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
> >> > strength was actually a weakness!
> >> 
> >> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
> >> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
> > 
> > Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just stealing the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away with it unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or nuclear silos).  The end of World is night.
> > 
> > At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took good use of that....
> 
> The *only* reason Apple chose BSD is because of the license.  This is
> Microsoft's dilemma.  At some point Windoze will be either Linux or BSD.

I don't think so, the VMS kernel has been the most rock stable and robust OS ever developed on this planet.  Without it, Windoze would already collapsed...  Unixes cannot compare to VMS...  Only if someone writes completely new OS from scratch but all attempts so far failed due to the degenerating human intellect (only muslims are reproducing while the intelligent white cold climate adapted race heading for extinction)...  We are only recycling over and over the old things developed decades ago for very poor hardware power which cannot compare to todays chips.

Can Google take over this planet by adopting the BeOS kernel for *droids?

> Linux is better, but BSD lets you close the source after adding trojan.
> What to do... what to do...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440403

Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 10:28:20 AM UTC+9, owl wrote:
>> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
>> >> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> >> > RonB wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
>> >> >>
>> >> >>~~
>> >> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>> >> >>are running Linux.
>> >> >>...
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
>> >> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
>> >> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
>> >> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>> >> >>...
>> >> >>~~
>> >> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
>> >> >
>> >> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
>> >> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
>> >> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
>> >> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
>> >> >
>> >> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
>> >> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
>> >> > strength was actually a weakness!
>> >> 
>> >> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
>> >> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
>> > 
>> > Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just stealing the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away with it unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or nuclear silos).  The end of World is night.
>> > 
>> > At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took good use of that....
>> 
>> The *only* reason Apple chose BSD is because of the license.  This is
>> Microsoft's dilemma.  At some point Windoze will be either Linux or BSD.
> 
> I don't think so, the VMS kernel has been the most rock stable and robust OS ever developed on this planet.  Without it, Windoze would already collapsed...

LOL!  http://ow.ly/T6qV30gC05B

>  Unixes cannot compare to VMS...  Only if someone writes completely new OS from scratch but all attempts so far failed due to the degenerating human intellect (only muslims are reproducing while the intelligent white cold climate adapted race heading for extinction)...  We are only recycling over and over the old things developed decades ago for very poor hardware power which cannot compare to todays chips.
> 
> Can Google take over this planet by adopting the BeOS kernel for *droids?
> 

Sounds good.  BeOS: 20+ years later and it's still single-user.  Linux
is wasted on droids.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440406

On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 2:37:34 PM UTC+9, owl wrote:
> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 10:28:20 AM UTC+9, owl wrote:
> >> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
> >> >> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >> >> > RonB wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>~~
> >> >> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
> >> >> >>are running Linux.
> >> >> >>...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
> >> >> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
> >> >> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
> >> >> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
> >> >> >>...
> >> >> >>~~
> >> >> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
> >> >> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
> >> >> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
> >> >> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
> >> >> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
> >> >> > strength was actually a weakness!
> >> >> 
> >> >> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
> >> >> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
> >> >> 
> >> >> -- 
> >> >> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
> >> > 
> >> > Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just stealing the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away with it unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or nuclear silos).  The end of World is night.
> >> > 
> >> > At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took good use of that....
> >> 
> >> The *only* reason Apple chose BSD is because of the license.  This is
> >> Microsoft's dilemma.  At some point Windoze will be either Linux or BSD.
> > 
> > I don't think so, the VMS kernel has been the most rock stable and robust OS ever developed on this planet.  Without it, Windoze would already collapsed...
> 
> LOL!  http://ow.ly/T6qV30gC05B

even the most stable kernel cannot make up for a bad ram or other hw defects...

> >  Unixes cannot compare to VMS...  Only if someone writes completely new OS from scratch but all attempts so far failed due to the degenerating human intellect (only muslims are reproducing while the intelligent white cold climate adapted race heading for extinction)...  We are only recycling over and over the old things developed decades ago for very poor hardware power which cannot compare to todays chips.
> > 
> > Can Google take over this planet by adopting the BeOS kernel for *droids?
> > 
> 
> Sounds good.  BeOS: 20+ years later and it's still single-user.  Linux
> is wasted on droids.

Droids are single user, DOS is single user, fast and stable, real time, ask what controls the ICBM nuke SILOs!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440407

Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 2:37:34 PM UTC+9, owl wrote:
>> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 10:28:20 AM UTC+9, owl wrote:
>> >> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
>> >> >> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >> > RonB wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>~~
>> >> >> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>> >> >> >>are running Linux.
>> >> >> >>...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
>> >> >> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
>> >> >> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
>> >> >> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>> >> >> >>...
>> >> >> >>~~
>> >> >> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
>> >> >> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
>> >> >> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
>> >> >> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
>> >> >> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
>> >> >> > strength was actually a weakness!
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
>> >> >> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> -- 
>> >> >> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just stealing the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away with it unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or nuclear silos).  The end of World is night.
>> >> > 
>> >> > At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took good use of that....
>> >> 
>> >> The *only* reason Apple chose BSD is because of the license.  This is
>> >> Microsoft's dilemma.  At some point Windoze will be either Linux or BSD.
>> > 
>> > I don't think so, the VMS kernel has been the most rock stable and robust OS ever developed on this planet.  Without it, Windoze would already collapsed...
>> 
>> LOL!  http://ow.ly/T6qV30gC05B
> 
> even the most stable kernel cannot make up for a bad ram or other hw defects...

Even the best hardware can't make up for doze.

> 
>> >  Unixes cannot compare to VMS...  Only if someone writes completely new OS from scratch but all attempts so far failed due to the degenerating human intellect (only muslims are reproducing while the intelligent white cold climate adapted race heading for extinction)...  We are only recycling over and over the old things developed decades ago for very poor hardware power which cannot compare to todays chips.
>> > 
>> > Can Google take over this planet by adopting the BeOS kernel for *droids?
>> > 
>> 
>> Sounds good.  BeOS: 20+ years later and it's still single-user.  Linux
>> is wasted on droids.
> 
> Droids are single user,

Yep.  Sounds like the perfect job for BeOS.

> DOS is single user, fast and stable, real time, ask what controls the ICBM nuke SILOs!

With doze in control, they will be self-nuke silos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440408

On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:42:58 PM UTC+9, owl wrote:
> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 2:37:34 PM UTC+9, owl wrote:
> >> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 10:28:20 AM UTC+9, owl wrote:
> >> >> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
> >> >> >> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >> >> >> > RonB wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>~~
> >> >> >> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
> >> >> >> >>are running Linux.
> >> >> >> >>...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
> >> >> >> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
> >> >> >> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
> >> >> >> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
> >> >> >> >>...
> >> >> >> >>~~
> >> >> >> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
> >> >> >> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
> >> >> >> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
> >> >> >> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
> >> >> >> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
> >> >> >> > strength was actually a weakness!
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
> >> >> >> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> -- 
> >> >> >> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just stealing the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away with it unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or nuclear silos).  The end of World is night.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took good use of that....
> >> >> 
> >> >> The *only* reason Apple chose BSD is because of the license.  This is
> >> >> Microsoft's dilemma.  At some point Windoze will be either Linux or BSD.
> >> > 
> >> > I don't think so, the VMS kernel has been the most rock stable and robust OS ever developed on this planet.  Without it, Windoze would already collapsed...
> >> 
> >> LOL!  http://ow.ly/T6qV30gC05B
> > 
> > even the most stable kernel cannot make up for a bad ram or other hw defects...
> 
> Even the best hardware can't make up for doze.
> 
> > 
> >> >  Unixes cannot compare to VMS...  Only if someone writes completely new OS from scratch but all attempts so far failed due to the degenerating human intellect (only muslims are reproducing while the intelligent white cold climate adapted race heading for extinction)...  We are only recycling over and over the old things developed decades ago for very poor hardware power which cannot compare to todays chips.
> >> > 
> >> > Can Google take over this planet by adopting the BeOS kernel for *droids?
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Sounds good.  BeOS: 20+ years later and it's still single-user.  Linux
> >> is wasted on droids.
> > 
> > Droids are single user,
> 
> Yep.  Sounds like the perfect job for BeOS.
> 
> > DOS is single user, fast and stable, real time, ask what controls the ICBM nuke SILOs!
> 
> With doze in control, they will be self-nuke silos.

So far only the SpaceX with Linux in cockpit falls from the sky ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440411

Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:42:58 PM UTC+9, owl wrote:
>> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 2:37:34 PM UTC+9, owl wrote:
>> >> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 10:28:20 AM UTC+9, owl wrote:
>> >> >> Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
>> >> >> >> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > RonB wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>~~
>> >> >> >> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>> >> >> >> >>are running Linux.
>> >> >> >> >>...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
>> >> >> >> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
>> >> >> >> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
>> >> >> >> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>> >> >> >> >>...
>> >> >> >> >>~~
>> >> >> >> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
>> >> >> >> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
>> >> >> >> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
>> >> >> >> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
>> >> >> >> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
>> >> >> >> > strength was actually a weakness!
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
>> >> >> >> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> -- 
>> >> >> >> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just stealing the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away with it unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or nuclear silos).  The end of World is night.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took good use of that....
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> The *only* reason Apple chose BSD is because of the license.  This is
>> >> >> Microsoft's dilemma.  At some point Windoze will be either Linux or BSD.
>> >> > 
>> >> > I don't think so, the VMS kernel has been the most rock stable and robust OS ever developed on this planet.  Without it, Windoze would already collapsed...
>> >> 
>> >> LOL!  http://ow.ly/T6qV30gC05B
>> > 
>> > even the most stable kernel cannot make up for a bad ram or other hw defects...
>> 
>> Even the best hardware can't make up for doze.
>> 
>> > 
>> >> >  Unixes cannot compare to VMS...  Only if someone writes completely new OS from scratch but all attempts so far failed due to the degenerating human intellect (only muslims are reproducing while the intelligent white cold climate adapted race heading for extinction)...  We are only recycling over and over the old things developed decades ago for very poor hardware power which cannot compare to todays chips.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Can Google take over this planet by adopting the BeOS kernel for *droids?
>> >> > 
>> >> 
>> >> Sounds good.  BeOS: 20+ years later and it's still single-user.  Linux
>> >> is wasted on droids.
>> > 
>> > Droids are single user,
>> 
>> Yep.  Sounds like the perfect job for BeOS.
>> 
>> > DOS is single user, fast and stable, real time, ask what controls the ICBM nuke SILOs!
>> 
>> With doze in control, they will be self-nuke silos.
> 
> So far only the SpaceX with Linux in cockpit falls from the sky ;-)

Fake X.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440397

On 2017-11-16, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:13:07 AM UTC+9, RonB wrote:
>> On 2017-11-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> > RonB wrote:
>> >
>> >>Not bad for "hobbyware."
>> >>
>> >>~~
>> >>It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
>> >>are running Linux.
>> >>...
>> >>
>> >>Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
>> >>first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
>> >>All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
>> >>
>> >>The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
>> >>running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
>> >>...
>> >>~~
>> >>http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
>> >
>> > I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
>> > supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
>> > versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
>> > "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
>> >
>> > As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
>> > infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
>> > strength was actually a weakness!
>> 
>> Nothing that is a positive for Linux "counts." That's how the hypocritcal 
>> anti-linux troll's "mind" "works." 
>> 
>> -- 
>> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
>
> Linux is good for hackers and people who build their own highly
> customized systems.  But it only got so much attention lately because
> the greedy corps no longer want to pay the OS developers and the good
> ones are getting scarce and more expensive as our population getting
> more and more dumb....  The CEOs can get bigger benefits just stealing
> the FOSS stuff which is VERY buggy but they can get away with it
> unless people get killed (e.g. put Linux into cockpits or nuclear
> silos).  The end of World is night.
>
> At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people
> naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took
> good use of that....
Bullshot. You are lousy troll...

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440420

> the bigot and kook Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>>
>> (idiocy snipped)

Right.  The "greedy corporations" "steal" software that is *free*, and
*despite* the fact that it's "very buggy".  (rolling eyes)

You know, it's kind of tough to satisfy your customers, using "very
buggy" software to power your product!

Unless you have a monopoly, like M$ does on the desktop.  They can get
away with it.

>> At least the BSD has been developed by paid academics and people
>> naturally intelligent naturally intelligent (not drug induced intelligence) and Apple took
>> good use of that....

There is something to be said for products that are not intended to to
be "profitable" or viable in the market.  They can be better, in some
ways.  Unfortunately, they inevitably fall behind the curve.

-- 
'each and every "advocate" happens to support the one and only
party-line that Schestowitz defined for them.'  -  trolling fsckwit
"Ezekiel", lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440446

>-- 
>'each and every "advocate" happens to support the one and only
>party-line that Schestowitz defined for them.'  -  trolling fsckwit
>"Ezekiel", lying shamelessly

When I called-out the Kreep on the above *lie*, he attacked me as
being too "stupid" to understand it is was a valid "opinion".  What a
lying fscking *asshole*.

-- 
'You COLA "advocates" are simply worthless pond scum.'  -  trolling
fsckwit "Ezekiel"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440517

On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 at 7:52:38 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> RonB wrote:
> 
> >Not bad for "hobbyware."
> >
> >~~
> >It finally happened. Today, all 500 of the world's top 500 supercomputers 
> >are running Linux.
> >...
> >
> >Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux 
> >first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: 
> >All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux.
> >
> >The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers 
> >running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list.
> >...
> >~~
> >http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-totally-dominates-supercomputers/ 
> 
> I recall Linux-hating trolls claiming that Linux usage in
> supercomputers didn't really "count", because they all use "customized
> versions" of Linux.  *boggle*  Like, so the fsck what?  There *is* no
> "one true Linux" - they are *all* "customized versions"!
> 
> As usual, the shitwits were trying to deny a strength of FOSS - it's
> infinite freedom and flexibility.  In their upside-down world, this
> strength was actually a weakness!
> 
> -- 
> "It's called Distro hell. This choice thing is a joke."  -  "True
> Linux advocate" Hadron Quark



Things change. Could be the idea of a usenet group is getting outdated. Having to tolerate the use of Xfce is not what most want to do. Sadly this is what happens when deeply bad self esteem takes over Prescott Computer Guy's mind. Perhaps you use it foolishly. Do you not realize the use of private networks? You guys can only speculate from the perspective of a psychopath. 

Now that nobody is talking to Prescott Computer Guy, he's making it sound like he's outsmarted us all -- when in fact, people are just not playing his game anymore. 



--
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know
http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding
http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit
Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy
http://prescottcomputerguy.com
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web