Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #485936 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-25 03:21 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-25 22:16 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 165 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: Satan's Playground — New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 03:21 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:03 -0600
Expecting to get facts from a fruit is pure insanity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 05:24 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 13:33 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 09:19 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-25 15:27 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 16:18 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:15 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 13:59 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:02 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 14:18 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:39 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 15:10 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:23 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 16:22 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 07:19 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-26 17:36 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 07:22 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 14:45 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:14 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:56 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:02 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 16:13 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:19 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 16:00 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-31 07:05 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:18 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:24 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 16:01 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:27 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:34 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:59 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:25 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:56 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:23 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:23 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:21 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:53 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-31 07:20 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 16:22 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:20 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:07 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-26 21:51 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 07:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 10:06 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:10 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 16:17 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:33 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:12 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 16:44 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:17 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 08:11 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:04 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 16:42 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 21:50 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:29 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-26 22:03 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 04:13 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 05:49 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 07:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 09:40 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 09:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 10:27 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-27 18:43 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 15:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 16:45 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 04:33 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:17 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 10:05 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 12:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 18:21 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 20:00 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 03:32 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-29 08:41 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 08:14 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 09:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 10:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 20:25 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 07:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 11:04 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 05:19 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 06:50 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 06:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 08:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 10:39 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 11:33 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 11:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 12:23 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 12:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-31 21:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 13:20 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-31 21:47 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 22:48 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 06:52 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 07:25 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 11:08 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:36 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:50 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 13:24 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:15 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:52 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:27 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:28 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-01 20:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:31 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 13:28 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 13:56 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-01 22:04 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 14:27 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Tommy B <riceornice8p@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 23:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 15:15 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 21:48 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 07:42 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-04 07:11 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York flyer <snowflyer09o@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 13:53 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 04:49 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 05:22 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 16:06 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 08:29 -0800
You can't forge the "Path:" line. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:51 -0800
Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:57 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:21 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 12:08 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 00:20 -0600
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 22:49 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 23:52 -0800
ProtonMail. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-04 23:05 -0800
Re: PutinMail. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-05 01:07 -0600
Re: ProtonMail. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 23:21 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 12:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 12:39 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 20:58 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 14:12 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 14:29 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:46 +0000
Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:45 -0800
Re: Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 19:02 +0000
You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 11:06 -0800
Re: You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 19:08 +0000
_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 11:28 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 00:29 -0600
_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-04 22:58 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 14:11 -0600
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-05 13:16 -0500
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-05 13:59 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-05 17:31 -0500
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2019-02-05 22:47 +0000
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-05 14:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 12:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 17:48 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-31 22:32 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 12:16 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-27 23:39 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 07:18 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:31 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:26 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 14:09 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:16 +0000
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-03 18:46 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <zxv0z8b03g.ag@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #486482 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 3:58:11 PM UTC-5, owl wrote: > >> The only header difficulty is Path, but >> the ability to preload Path is matter a policy of a particular server. >> Given a server with loose policy wrt Path (or if you control the server), >> it would be easy to make a very convincing forgery. > > Which IIRC you said 'can be done', but you chose not to violate your > Server's TOS in order to show it being done. A related question that > I'd have is if the Path is static or dynamic in nature, because if its the > latter, it presumably would be harder to keep maintained. > The full Path you see depends on your server.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 10:45 -0800 |
| Subject | Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.2--10.45am.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #486390 |
Owl: > Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress, you disingenuous shyster.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 19:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. |
| Message-ID | <az0b8083gag.a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #486463 |
Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Owl: >> Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). > > Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress, > you disingenuous shyster. So? Don't use Google Groups. Just make it look like you did with an Injection-Info line. (see headers).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 11:06 -0800 |
| Subject | You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.2--11.06am.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #486466 |
Owl: > Alt.NET ➤ Googlegroups.COM, 127.0.0.1 You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 19:08 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. |
| Message-ID | <s9z098xf08b.a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #486468 |
Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Owl: >> Alt.NET ➤ Googlegroups.COM, 127.0.0.1 > > You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. You can preload it, but that's against my TOS. Still can be done though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 11:28 -0800 |
| Subject | _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.2--11.28am.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #486469 |
Owl: > > You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. > > You can preload it, but that's against my TOS. Still can be done though. _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-05 00:29 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. |
| Message-ID | <q3bagk$15q$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #486472 |
On 2/2/2019 1:28 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Owl: >>> You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. >> >> You can preload it, but that's against my TOS. Still can be done though. > > _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. > path only goes from server to newsgroup....... Path: aioe.org!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q69no358057itb.0!news-out.google.com!v71ni453ita.0!nntp.google.com!k10no357147itk.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID is not forgable you can inject a message into the middle, too. if you know the server, and they support it, did that a few times. I have seen some really stripped down headders too, only about 5 lines, not sure what they are using, quicksilver network? think that is down now, but you could run it off your pc, not use a mail client....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-04 22:58 -0800 |
| Subject | _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.4--10.58pm.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #486760 |
Serg_Io: > > _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, Owl. > > The "Path:" line only goes from server to newsgroup....... It's a list of servers; newsgroups have nothing to do with it. > The "Message-ID" line is not forgable Most servers let you put ANYTHING you want into the "Message-ID" line, so long as it's reasonably unique ( a@b ).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-05 14:11 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. |
| Message-ID | <q3cqlt$13q0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #486763 |
On 2/5/2019 12:58 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Serg_Io: >>> _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, Owl. >> >> The "Path:" line only goes from server to newsgroup....... > > It's a list of servers; newsgroups have nothing to do with it. should have been "newsgroup server" > >> The "Message-ID" line is not forgable > > Most servers let you put ANYTHING you want into the "Message-ID" line, > so long as it's reasonably unique ( a@b ). > dosent newsgroup server, assigned that #, and stick it in header? seems yours shows that you are right; Message-ID: <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.4--10.58pm.Seattle.2019> I'm posting on aioe,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-05 13:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. |
| Message-ID | <6nkj5e9gr7s2mer1obmsueepm9511kt5kr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #486472 |
On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 11:28:56 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >Owl: >> > You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. >> >> You can preload it, but that's against my TOS. Still can be done though. > >_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. I can forge the path line by pre-loading it. Altopia allows path preloads. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-05 13:59 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36c3a73312430f6e996314@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #486815 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <6nkj5e9gr7s2mer1obmsueepm9511kt5kr@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... # # On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 11:28:56 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: # # >Owl: # >> > You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. # >> # >> You can preload it, but that's against my TOS. Still can be done though. # > # >_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. # # I can forge the path line by pre-loading it. # Altopia allows path preloads. And they're a dead giveaway for anyone who bothers to check. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-05 17:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. |
| Message-ID | <df3k5edvh78c5ov579tk2agjsedcmalsh3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #486823 |
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Checkmate <sickgaybian1@gmail.com> wrote: > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... <...> >> I can forge the path line by pre-loading it. >> Altopia allows path preloads. > >And they're a dead giveaway for anyone who bothers to check. And, just whom, among this ignorant rabble, would that be? -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-05 22:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. |
| Message-ID | <1o2jr87.cox2bnl3sclzN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #486824 |
Crapstain Neal Warren aka Skidmark Gergory Hall <moot@fake.yacht_mooter> mooted: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Checkmate <sickgaybian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > <...> > > >> I can forge the path line by pre-loading it. <---[skidmark] > >> Altopia allows path preloads. <---[skidmark] > > > >And they're a dead giveaway for anyone who bothers to check. > > And, just whom, among this ignorant rabble, would that be? <---[skidmark] Feh. Moot or what? -- Darth Wader, WoD #1 No Club I can't help it 'bout the shape I'm in, I can't sing, I ain't pretty and my legs are thin. Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-05 14:54 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36c3b41b1f84fbbc996317@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #486824 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <df3k5edvh78c5ov579tk2agjsedcmalsh3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... # # On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Checkmate <sickgaybian1@gmail.com> wrote: # > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... # # <...> # # >> I can forge the path line by pre-loading it. # >> Altopia allows path preloads. # > # >And they're a dead giveaway for anyone who bothers to check. # # And, just whom, among this ignorant rabble, would that be? Anyone who actually gives a shit. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 12:54 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <e4a6b7f4-a3a6-4c0f-bf62-97ee3e82b882@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486378 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:25:36 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > > > > In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a > > bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination > > to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability > > requirements have been defined and analyzed. > > > > Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! For most I'd just think the comment is dubious. However, given that it's Steve Carroll I would drop that step and go straight to 'trolling' because that's most of what Steve Carroll does. No need to find evidence before accusing Steve Carroll of lying. Steve Carroll must understand that Jonas Eklundh can go get mySQL, right, gluey? Add to that, anyone can filter his posts, which renders his trolling useless, just like Steve Carroll ;) Having to suffer the use of GnuPG is not what most want to do. Honestly, those of you who troll are not able to control Jonas Eklundh anymore. Steve Carroll is repeatedly seen declaring "I KNOW BETTER" when it comes to information on the Internet where info is there multiple times... but Steve Carroll is just too obtuse or lost to interpret any instruction he finds. Sadly there are too many "slow is good enough" GnuPG users and not enough old school users with the time to help the people with Android. - This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!! https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 17:48 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <gbgqnmFa04kU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #486214 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 7:50:09 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> Since ~2008; Area/Access Denial SME; go use DTIC for literature searches. >> >> Proof? And even if you did prove it, this doesn't mean you >> are intimately familiar with issues facing the people on the >> ground. > > <https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1034816.pdf> > <https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1032098.pdf> > > That's all I saw by searching on your name, if there's more, > and it's actually relevant, you're going to have to point it out. > Your stalking is creepy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 22:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <q2vt1b$13ne$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #486240 |
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:48:38 +0000, Snit wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 7:50:09 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>>> Since ~2008; Area/Access Denial SME; go use DTIC for literature >>>> searches. >>> >>> Proof? And even if you did prove it, this doesn't mean you are >>> intimately familiar with issues facing the people on the ground. >> >> <https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1034816.pdf> >> <https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1032098.pdf> >> >> That's all I saw by searching on your name, if there's more, >> and it's actually relevant, you're going to have to point it out. >> >> > Your stalking is creepy. Have you learned to drive yet snit? Someone emailed me information about you and apparently you seem to have an unusually high number of traffic violations going all the way back to when you lived in Las Vegas. Your auto insurance bill must be astronomical. Assuming you even have insurance which I'll wager you don't. After all, you have nothing to sue for. You live in a mortgaged double wide trailer and have no assets. All public record snit. And no, I'm not stalking you. I actually could care less about you working the system. Just giving you some of your own medicine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 12:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <gb92osFitvoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #486087 |
On 1/28/19 9:17 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, January 28, 2019 at 5:33:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >> On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 7:45:30 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 4:16:59 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>> On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 1:27:55 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 10:54:43 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>>>> [repost] >>>>>> >>>>>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I think with some feminists, there is a definite hatred of motherhood. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And rather than mansplainingly guessing, you’ve actually discussed >>>>>>>> this in depth with ‘feminist’ women ... when? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A fair point but since when are they a monolithic block, >>>>>>> which is how you're trying to portray it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ask RonB, as it was he who claimed a monolithic “hatred of motherhood” >>>>> >>>>> He's not the one who wrote what you did... that I'm >>>>> questioning. >>>> >>>> Which was just what, precisely? >>> >>> "And rather than mansplainingly guessing, you’ve actually discussed >>> this in depth with ‘feminist’ women ... when?" -hh >>> >>> There is no group of -‘feminist’ women- that would give the >>> OP a lock step reply upon discussion. >> >> Correct, which was part of the reason why I called RonB out on it. > > Yet, you did the what you're claiming he did... ‘feminist’ > women are not a 'group' from which a singular answer can > be obtained. IIRC, even early feminists were against abortion. And early Republicans were for equal rights, early in NRA history they were for gun laws to promote public safety... that is no longer the case. Times change. >>> And there's no law that has ever created such a group, that's just >>> something on your wish list. >> >> False, for I never claimed any such thing. > > I never said that, I'm merely differentiating your wish list > from reality in a joking manner and I forget a smiley, sue me ;) Did Marek ever actually do so as he claimed he would? I seriously doubt it. >>>>>>>> Here’s a clue: I’m going >>>>>>>> to tell you just how you’re allowed & not allowed .. to live your private life. >>>>>>>> This is going to start with you having to give up Linux and pay more for OSX. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When you bring "pay" into it ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope, for there’s never not been a cost of childbearing. >>>>> >>>>> It's a matter of who pays that cost, not simply if there >>>>> is one... and "pay" does change the topic's context, >>>>> the OP's gripe appears to be on religious grounds. >>>> >>>> Cost is what remains after the religious argument, which was already >>>> addressed and shot down: >>>> >>>> "As opposed to merely individuals who understand and support >>>> a Constitutionally secular country rather than a Caliphate." >>> >>> ??? With respect to 'who pays', federally, the only Constitutional >>> aspect of this is based on the Hyde Amendment and/or ones that >>> are related to it. >> >> No, this isn't the "who pays" part. > > LOL! Of course it is... and *you* opened that door. We should have universal health care... and that should cover the cost of such health care concerns. Simple. >> This is referring to the part where >> some people want to destroy the 1st Amendment and make the USA >> into a religious Caliphate. > > The OP's main issue appears to be based on the fact that > there is no good yardstick for when full term abortion will > occur and how it'll be left up to the person who stands to > profit from performing it. Profit from performing it? Oy. Sounds like you listen to Breitbart. > Those both seem like reasonable > concerns, yet, you're yammering about a "Caliphate". > What's wrong with this picture? > >> And because as we've seen even comment that even the Pope isn't >> conservative enough for them, it would be the hypocrite wing of the Evangelicals. >> >> >>>>>> In the last decade, college >>>>>> has alone grown to be ~$100K. >>>>>> >>>>>>> the context gets shifted 'cuz some >>>>>>> might be more against having to foot the bill for abortion than >>>>>>> the procedure. >>>>>> >>>>>> False dichotomy, since the procedure has been banned from using >>>>>> Federal funds for decades. Even so, pacifists aren’t allowed by law >>>>>> to demand that none of their taxes to go to the DoD, etc. >>>>> >>>>> Of course they can, doesn't mean they'll get anything >>>>> for their effort. Not all expenditures are federal, doesn't >>>>> mean it didn't cost 'society' if they're not. >>>> >>>> Except for how the current agenda is seeking to change the law so >>>> that even those who are willing & able to pay for these services entirely >>>> out of their own pockets will not be allowed to do so. >>> >>> If it passes we'll have to live with that, it's not like POTUS >>> candidates like Clinton didn't refer to this, as being paid for >>> by others, as a "right". Hyde makes it clear there is no right >>> unless certain circumstances are met. IOW... there's another >>> political agenda someone or other doesn't like and, yes, the >>> outcome involves regulation again... news at 11. >> >> Wrong: the noted agenda is to make it entirely illegal, not merely >> that IAW Hyde the Government doesn't pay for it. That's why this >> isn't merely about who pays. > > So what if that's the agenda of *some*? In this case the "some" is much of the Republican party. They are a minority but they want to control others. > Do you fear a return > to Comstock era? ;) That's not going to happen... but even if > it did, it'd be based on 'the will of the people' through their > duly elected reps so we'd have to live with it until another > change was made. The people OR the representatives? Those are not the same. Remember, the Republicans have the power they do based on a system akin to affirmative action for people in less populated states. > Some Muslims have an agenda to install > Sharia Law here... everyone has an agenda <shrug>. In this country the bigger threat is Christians pushing Biblical law... which is just as bad (though to be fair in general Christians ignore the laws of their holy books more than do Muslims... in general). >>>> This shoots down >>>> all of the 'I don't want to personally pay' arguments too, >>> >>> Actually, Hyde (mostly) took care of that on a federal level. >> >> Correct. >> >>>> which means >>>> that this is stripped bare down to some people wanting to dictate how >>>> others choose to live their life. >>> >>> ??? How is it not dictating how to live one's life when their >>> pocket is being reached into (even on the state level)? >> >> You're feigning confusion because you're only looking at the "payer" in this. > > Actually, I'm just noting hypocrisy. FWIW, I haven't "only" > looked at the "payer" aspect; I did so with you because > you brought it up in your analogy. When I see right wingers show concern over who is paying for the wealthy and the government tithing and tax cuts I will take their concern for "who pays" seriously. Until then they are blowing smoke. >>>>>>> Notable is the fact that some are more pro birth >>>>>>> than they are pro life, which is what you've alluded to. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ethically, it’s both or neither. That’s why the “birthers” are a bunch >>>>>> of flaming hypocrites who are destined to be going straight to Hell. >>>>> >>>>> Their "Hell", or your version of it? ;) >>>> >>>> Mostly their own -- I'd rather see them suffer a living hell. >>>> >>>>> I see a third option >>>>> of being fine with someone wanting to abort as long as >>>>> they bear their responsibility for it. I'm reading that you >>>>> are against that, at least, for what you call 'the poor'. >>>> >>>> Wrong reading. >>> >>> So you're saying it's not possible that a person can not >>> give a crap about abortion other than they know they >>> don't want to pay for someone else's (I'm not talking >>> about 'the law' here... and it's not like you're sticking >>> to that, either, you're talking some 'wish list' stuff)? >> >> Wrong reading. > > LOL! You pretend it is about money then say you want to go with the policy that would cost you more. Do you see why that is not an easy thing to sell? >>>>> Should being poor, by some undefined definition, absolve >>>>> you of the 'natural' order of having to bear responsibility >>>>> for your offspring? >>>> >>>> Merely YA example of one of your Straw Man fallacies put in effect. >>> >>> No, it was a legitimate question, I'm wondering if there is any >>> kind of cutoff point for you on, well, *any* 'liberal' issue. I've >>> never seen one from you so I'm curious if there are any. >> >> Wrong reading. > > You're making less and less sense as you go along. A cutoff on what? You are not even trying to make a point. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 23:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <q2lffu$1tf3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #486056 |
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 07:44:25 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 6:49:13 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >> RonB wrote: >> > >> >I think with some feminists, there is a definite hatred of motherhood. >> >> And rather than mansplainingly guessing, you’ve actually discussed this >> in depth with ‘feminist’ women ... when? > > A fair point but since when are they a monolithic block, > which is how you're trying to portray it? Look around, you'll see > varying definitions of what it means to be a 'feminist'. I'm a feminist. I believe in traditional families. I believe in me too. I oppose abortion, completely. So where do I fit in?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 08:31 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <9803543a-eee1-4aa6-af06-a1b7171eb900@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486078 |
On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 4:39:48 PM UTC-7, Amanda KoXXX wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 07:44:25 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 6:49:13 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > >> RonB wrote: > >> > > >> >I think with some feminists, there is a definite hatred of motherhood. > >> > >> And rather than mansplainingly guessing, you’ve actually discussed this > >> in depth with ‘feminist’ women ... when? > > > > A fair point but since when are they a monolithic block, > > which is how you're trying to portray it? Look around, you'll see > > varying definitions of what it means to be a 'feminist'. > > I'm a feminist. > I believe in traditional families. > I believe in me too. > I oppose abortion, completely. > > So where do I fit in? You don't, the 'Pen of the Most High', hh, hath decreed it ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web