Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #485272 > unrolled thread
| Started by | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-20 17:20 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-01-21 13:47 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 81 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-20 17:20 -0500
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-20 23:20 +0000
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 00:18 +0000
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 16:30 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 16:46 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-21 07:16 -0500
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 04:59 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 13:31 +0000
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-26 12:19 -0500
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 19:46 +0000
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-26 19:52 +0000
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 23:11 +0000
Moi enjoys dumping upon pussy whipped RonB, at every possible opportunity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 05:44 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 12:39 -0500
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 19:12 +0000
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 12:42 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 20:05 -0500
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 01:56 +0000
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 18:11 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-23 12:43 -0500
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 10:04 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 14:31 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 19:14 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-21 08:19 -0600
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 12:36 -0500
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 10:22 -0800
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-26 12:21 -0500
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-26 17:51 +0000
Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-30 18:58 -0500
OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-20 15:30 -0800
Super Wide Screens do come handy in dealing with National Weather Service Forecast Maps. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 05:42 -0800
Re: Super Wide Screens do come handy in dealing with National Weather Service Forecast Maps. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 05:46 -0800
LOL - What a Dumb Fuck! Snit openingly admits to living on COLA. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 05:58 -0800
Re: LOL - What a Dumb Fuck! Snit openingly admits to living on COLA. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 06:48 -0800
Re: LOL - What a Dumb Fuck! Snit openingly admits to living on COLA. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 15:13 +0000
Snit wrote it, Snit. May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain transplant? How about the Doorknob solution? Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 07:46 -0800
Re: Snit wrote it, Snit. May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain transplant? How about the Doorknob solution? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 15:51 +0000
Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 08:18 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 08:35 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 17:55 +0000
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 11:12 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-21 20:11 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 17:25 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-21 21:18 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 18:39 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-21 22:02 -0500
DFS reminds me of Amanda KoXXX, (Judas) Iscariot, 69 4 me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-22 02:30 -0800
Re: DFS reminds me of Amanda KoXXX, (Judas) Iscariot, 69 4 me. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 02:35 -0800
Re: DFS reminds me of Amanda KoXXX, (Judas) Iscariot, 69 4 me. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 04:39 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-22 09:23 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 06:42 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 14:34 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-23 09:33 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 07:24 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-24 09:02 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 14:11 +0000
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 08:29 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-24 12:27 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 10:14 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 13:11 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-26 21:50 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 07:50 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-27 16:00 +0000
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:10 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:11 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-27 12:36 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 11:03 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 06:54 +0000
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 12:19 -0700
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 20:43 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 01:50 -0700
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-27 06:02 +0000
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-23 20:37 +0000
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-23 18:24 -0500
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 20:34 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 06:11 +0000
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 22:55 -0800
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 06:11 +0000
Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 00:29 -0800
LOL - What a Dumb Fuck! Snit openingly admits to living on COLA Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 13:21 -0800
Re: LOL - What a Dumb Fuck! Snit openingly admits to living on COLA Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 13:47 -0800
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 17:20 -0500 |
| Subject | OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor |
| Message-ID | <Ot61E.197790$QQ5.79024@fx45.iad> |
My wife gave it to me for Christmas. https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and cola on right half. Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets onscreen at once, or two browser pages. Nice!
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 23:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9a0b803t33.au3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #485272 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > My wife gave it to me for Christmas. > > https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV > > Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and > cola on right half. > > Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets > onscreen at once, or two browser pages. > > Nice! > https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-21 00:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2333p$7op$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #485285 |
On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. >> >> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV >> >> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and >> cola on right half. >> >> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets >> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. >> >> Nice! >> > > https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to the NFL. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 16:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2966b79f-f9fb-4d53-a1ce-4f61883a0abb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485292 |
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:18:03 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote: > On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. > >> > >> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV > >> > >> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and > >> cola on right half. > >> > >> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets > >> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. > >> > >> Nice! > >> > > > > https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg > > Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the > spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are > leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who > WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the > non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs > supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly > overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. > > I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and > then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I > would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to > the NFL. > > -- > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux. Honestly, what lie? You wishing for something does not make it true. Steve Petruzzellis and bigdog had their successes and their errors. But one played it as supernatural and didn't do anything too horrendous that could not be backed with peer reviews. You _do_ realize that the massive floods ending up in multiple groups started out as a joke about hacking Google. It's a prolonged conflict, and bigdog is simultaneously unable to stop his trolling remarks, while posting with nyms that speak just like him. Translation of bigdog speak: His "problem solving abilities" side tracked him from an extension he wants that is already built into this application. The only thing defective here is bigdog. -- Puppy Videos https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ https://youtu.be/IhOfBmWwCVY Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 16:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8fd72a7b-c4cc-44ec-99f4-a11a0bc3cffc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485292 |
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:18:03 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote: > On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. > >> > >> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV > >> > >> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and > >> cola on right half. > >> > >> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets > >> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. > >> > >> Nice! > >> > > > > https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg > > Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the > spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are > leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who > WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the > non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs > supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly > overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. > > I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and > then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I > would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to > the NFL. > > -- > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux. BTW, I've already proved that his use of "cult-like" to describe honest people is defamation of character, since he's likening them to lower life forms. Regardless of my own feelings about openSUSE, I even now continue to load it for clients who have had trouble with OS X. Script 'The Fool' Troller asked to be rated according to direct statistical evidence, which I obliged him with. Script 'The Fool' Troller wants to punish the whole group: If Script 'The Fool' Troller can't get attention here then his flooding crap will. - Puppy Videos!! http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/BilkHelp.html Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-21 07:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q24ehm$os$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #485292 |
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the > spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are > leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who > WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the > non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs > supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly > overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. > > I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and > then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I > would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to > the NFL. Do you *ever* enjoy *anything*, Ron? -- Beware of Bigfoot!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-21 04:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <122f2641-22e4-43ad-957f-ce962a9be537@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485342 |
On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:39:20 AM UTC-7, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the > > spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are > > leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who > > WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the > > non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs > > supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly > > overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. > > > > I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and > > then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I > > would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to > > the NFL. > > Do you *ever* enjoy *anything*, Ron? > > -- > Beware of Bigfoot! Why does Klaus Schadenfreude focus on Steve Petruzzellis's self-esteem issues so much? Given how often it seems that Klaus Schadenfreude's signature is some distortion of a narrative Steve Petruzzellis made which had been a bodyslam on Klaus Schadenfreude for something he did which was ill-considered/dishonest/etc... its clearly a repeated reminder of Klaus Schadenfreude's continuing unease for having been so repeatedly destroyed. Why do you keep quoting yourself? Do you have a MCSE certification? -- Get Rich Slow https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-21 13:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q24hjg$j2e$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #485342 |
On 2019-01-21, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >> spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >> leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >> WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >> non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >> supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >> overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. >> >> I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >> then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >> would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >> the NFL. > > Do you *ever* enjoy *anything*, Ron? Am I supposed to enjoy obvious cheating? Do you? Do you like to see the team that won screwed out its victory? How does a ref, two yards away, miss the most obvious flagrant pass interference foul I've ever seen? There were two other fouls that could have been called on this play. Helmet to helmet and unnecessary roughness on a "helpless receiver." The ref started to pull out his flag and put it back. If that's not a fixed call, there never has been one. If you somehow *enjoyed* this obvious cheating, then cheating must cause you enjoyment. That's the only conclusion I can come to. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 12:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q2i660$ur5$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #485349 |
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2019-01-21, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >>> spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >>> leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >>> WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >>> non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >>> supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >>> overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. >>> >>> I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >>> then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >>> would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >>> the NFL. >> >> Do you *ever* enjoy *anything*, Ron? > > Am I supposed to enjoy obvious cheating? Do you? Do you like to see the team > that won screwed out its victory? > > How does a ref, two yards away, miss the most obvious flagrant pass > interference foul I've ever seen? There were two other fouls that could have > been called on this play. Helmet to helmet and unnecessary roughness on a > "helpless receiver." The ref started to pull out his flag and put it back. > If that's not a fixed call, there never has been one. > > If you somehow *enjoyed* this obvious cheating, then cheating must cause you > enjoyment. That's the only conclusion I can come to. That's because you reason by analog, rather than logic. Just enjoy the game. Including the blown calls that affect a team that is not your team. It's just a game. Let it go. -- You have a truly strong individuality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 19:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2idee$esi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #486018 |
On 2019-01-26, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2019-01-21, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >>>> spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >>>> leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >>>> WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >>>> non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >>>> supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >>>> overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. >>>> >>>> I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >>>> then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >>>> would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >>>> the NFL. >>> >>> Do you *ever* enjoy *anything*, Ron? >> >> Am I supposed to enjoy obvious cheating? Do you? Do you like to see the team >> that won screwed out its victory? >> >> How does a ref, two yards away, miss the most obvious flagrant pass >> interference foul I've ever seen? There were two other fouls that could have >> been called on this play. Helmet to helmet and unnecessary roughness on a >> "helpless receiver." The ref started to pull out his flag and put it back. >> If that's not a fixed call, there never has been one. >> >> If you somehow *enjoyed* this obvious cheating, then cheating must cause you >> enjoyment. That's the only conclusion I can come to. > > That's because you reason by analog, rather than logic. > > Just enjoy the game. Including the blown calls that affect a team that is not > your team. > > It's just a game. > > Let it go. The whole point of the game is to win by following the rules. If you cheat, or are given an unfair advantage by non-call on a foul a blind man could have seen, then it's not really a game. But you're right, "let it go." I've got better things to do with my life than watch rigged games. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 19:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <az0b803tagt3.4@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #486031 |
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-01-26, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On 2019-01-21, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>>> Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >>>>> spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >>>>> leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >>>>> WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >>>>> non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >>>>> supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >>>>> overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. >>>>> >>>>> I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >>>>> then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >>>>> would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >>>>> the NFL. >>>> >>>> Do you *ever* enjoy *anything*, Ron? >>> >>> Am I supposed to enjoy obvious cheating? Do you? Do you like to see the team >>> that won screwed out its victory? >>> >>> How does a ref, two yards away, miss the most obvious flagrant pass >>> interference foul I've ever seen? There were two other fouls that could have >>> been called on this play. Helmet to helmet and unnecessary roughness on a >>> "helpless receiver." The ref started to pull out his flag and put it back. >>> If that's not a fixed call, there never has been one. >>> >>> If you somehow *enjoyed* this obvious cheating, then cheating must cause you >>> enjoyment. That's the only conclusion I can come to. >> >> That's because you reason by analog, rather than logic. >> >> Just enjoy the game. Including the blown calls that affect a team that is not >> your team. >> >> It's just a game. >> >> Let it go. > > The whole point of the game is to win by following the rules. If you cheat, > or are given an unfair advantage by non-call on a foul a blind man could > have seen, then it's not really a game. > > But you're right, "let it go." I've got better things to do with my life > than watch rigged games. > I say no texting while reffing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 23:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2ipf1$gvr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #486033 |
On 2019-01-26, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2019-01-26, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> On 2019-01-21, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>> >>>>>> Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >>>>>> spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >>>>>> leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >>>>>> WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >>>>>> non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >>>>>> supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >>>>>> overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >>>>>> then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >>>>>> would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >>>>>> the NFL. >>>>> >>>>> Do you *ever* enjoy *anything*, Ron? >>>> >>>> Am I supposed to enjoy obvious cheating? Do you? Do you like to see the team >>>> that won screwed out its victory? >>>> >>>> How does a ref, two yards away, miss the most obvious flagrant pass >>>> interference foul I've ever seen? There were two other fouls that could have >>>> been called on this play. Helmet to helmet and unnecessary roughness on a >>>> "helpless receiver." The ref started to pull out his flag and put it back. >>>> If that's not a fixed call, there never has been one. >>>> >>>> If you somehow *enjoyed* this obvious cheating, then cheating must cause you >>>> enjoyment. That's the only conclusion I can come to. >>> >>> That's because you reason by analog, rather than logic. >>> >>> Just enjoy the game. Including the blown calls that affect a team that is not >>> your team. >>> >>> It's just a game. >>> >>> Let it go. >> >> The whole point of the game is to win by following the rules. If you cheat, >> or are given an unfair advantage by non-call on a foul a blind man could >> have seen, then it's not really a game. >> >> But you're right, "let it go." I've got better things to do with my life >> than watch rigged games. >> > > I say no texting while reffing. Yeah, maybe that was it. He was probabaly asking the NFL if he could call the obvious foul. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-21 05:44 -0800 |
| Subject | Moi enjoys dumping upon pussy whipped RonB, at every possible opportunity |
| Message-ID | <ed2671ac-7e6f-4cba-a19e-5ce2b0272d06@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485342 |
On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 7:39:20 AM UTC-5, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the > > spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are > > leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who > > WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the > > non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs > > supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly > > overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. > > > > I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and > > then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I > > would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to > > the NFL. > > Do you *ever* enjoy *anything*, Ron? Moi enjoys dumping upon pussy whipped RonB, at every possible opportunity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | silverslimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 12:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <i7le4eh7ksb290l62vvbg30kfbur8k6l7s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #485292 |
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. >>> >>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV >>> >>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and >>> cola on right half. >>> >>> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets >>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. >>> >>> Nice! >>> >> >> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg > >Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. > >I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >the NFL. I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in Bellator.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 19:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q27pv3$rhp$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #485648 |
On 2019-01-22, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB ><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. >>>> >>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV >>>> >>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and >>>> cola on right half. >>>> >>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets >>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. >>>> >>>> Nice! >>>> >>> >>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg >> >>Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >>spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >>leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >>WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >>non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >>supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >>overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. >> >>I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >>then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >>would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >>the NFL. > > I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing > that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is > involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin > play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I > occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in > Bellator. I should ignore sports also. So much of it is rigged now. The L.A. Rams spent a fortune for players, they're in a new market and the NFL has been biased toward them all year. This was just such unbelievably obvious cheating that it was pretty hard to swallow. I quit watching football a few years ago but, unfortunately for me, I still look at the results and the highlights. Once I break that habit I'll be a lot happier. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 12:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ad433074-cfca-4959-8433-d0e363e95ddf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485669 |
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 at 12:12:37 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote: > On 2019-01-22, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB > ><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. > >>>> > >>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV > >>>> > >>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and > >>>> cola on right half. > >>>> > >>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets > >>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. > >>>> > >>>> Nice! > >>>> > >>> > >>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg > >> > >>Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the > >>spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are > >>leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who > >>WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the > >>non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs > >>supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly > >>overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. > >> > >>I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and > >>then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I > >>would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to > >>the NFL. > > > > I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing > > that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is > > involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin > > play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I > > occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in > > Bellator. > > I should ignore sports also. So much of it is rigged now. The L.A. Rams > spent a fortune for players, they're in a new market and the NFL has been > biased toward them all year. This was just such unbelievably obvious > cheating that it was pretty hard to swallow. I quit watching football a few > years ago but, unfortunately for me, I still look at the results and the > highlights. Once I break that habit I'll be a lot happier. > > -- > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux. Virtually everything bigdog says about anyone is false of course, but he does not care. Usenet is a free concordat based on mutual trust with strangers that bigdog lacks. bigdog and Jonas Eklundh both lie ceaselessly and outrageously and continue to do so. So no point in showing any further care or restraint. Jonas Eklundh's earliest statement stands true and correct. Jonas Eklundh fooled bigdog a bit, big f*cking deal. Why be a yowling schmuck about it? -- Do not click this link!! https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0 https://youtu.be/0ZNxaaKD7-c https://redd.it/6sfhq6 Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | silverslimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 20:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1dff4e1flrsea1pg1tm0954v1egibdug2n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #485669 |
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:12:35 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2019-01-22, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB >><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV >>>>> >>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and >>>>> cola on right half. >>>>> >>>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets >>>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. >>>>> >>>>> Nice! >>>>> >>>> >>>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg >>> >>>Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >>>spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >>>leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >>>WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >>>non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >>>supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >>>overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. >>> >>>I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >>>then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >>>would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >>>the NFL. >> >> I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing >> that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is >> involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin >> play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I >> occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in >> Bellator. > >I should ignore sports also. So much of it is rigged now. The L.A. Rams >spent a fortune for players, they're in a new market and the NFL has been >biased toward them all year. This was just such unbelievably obvious >cheating that it was pretty hard to swallow. I quit watching football a few >years ago but, unfortunately for me, I still look at the results and the >highlights. Once I break that habit I'll be a lot happier. Tell yourself that much of these sports exist primarily to distract us from all of the bullshit politicians do. It's easy to pass unfair bills and laws if the Super Bowl is there to distract everyone from the news.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 01:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q28hjl$3jk$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #485713 |
On 2019-01-23, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:12:35 -0000 (UTC), RonB ><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 2019-01-22, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB >>><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV >>>>>> >>>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and >>>>>> cola on right half. >>>>>> >>>>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets >>>>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nice! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg >>>> >>>>Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >>>>spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >>>>leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >>>>WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >>>>non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >>>>supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >>>>overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. >>>> >>>>I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >>>>then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >>>>would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >>>>the NFL. >>> >>> I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing >>> that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is >>> involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin >>> play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I >>> occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in >>> Bellator. >> >>I should ignore sports also. So much of it is rigged now. The L.A. Rams >>spent a fortune for players, they're in a new market and the NFL has been >>biased toward them all year. This was just such unbelievably obvious >>cheating that it was pretty hard to swallow. I quit watching football a few >>years ago but, unfortunately for me, I still look at the results and the >>highlights. Once I break that habit I'll be a lot happier. > > Tell yourself that much of these sports exist primarily to distract us > from all of the bullshit politicians do. It's easy to pass unfair > bills and laws if the Super Bowl is there to distract everyone from > the news. Like the Romans' "bread and circuses." Now it's welfare and sports. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 18:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <51b105c6-3839-435f-a5f1-a31cb4c0f23d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485728 |
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 at 6:56:07 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote: > On 2019-01-23, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:12:35 -0000 (UTC), RonB > ><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>On 2019-01-22, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > >>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB > >>><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >>>>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and > >>>>>> cola on right half. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets > >>>>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Nice! > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg > >>>> > >>>>Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the > >>>>spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are > >>>>leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who > >>>>WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the > >>>>non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs > >>>>supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly > >>>>overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. > >>>> > >>>>I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and > >>>>then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I > >>>>would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to > >>>>the NFL. > >>> > >>> I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing > >>> that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is > >>> involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin > >>> play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I > >>> occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in > >>> Bellator. > >> > >>I should ignore sports also. So much of it is rigged now. The L.A. Rams > >>spent a fortune for players, they're in a new market and the NFL has been > >>biased toward them all year. This was just such unbelievably obvious > >>cheating that it was pretty hard to swallow. I quit watching football a few > >>years ago but, unfortunately for me, I still look at the results and the > >>highlights. Once I break that habit I'll be a lot happier. > > > > Tell yourself that much of these sports exist primarily to distract us > > from all of the bullshit politicians do. It's easy to pass unfair > > bills and laws if the Super Bowl is there to distract everyone from > > the news. > > Like the Romans' "bread and circuses." Now it's welfare and sports. > > -- > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux. Klaus Schadenfreude must know that anyone can go get mySQL, right, sicko? On top of that, anyone can go get a real newsreader with proper filtering, which renders his trolling harmless, just like Klaus Schadenfreude ;) Klaus Schadenfreude doesn't know if there is a free open source program to handle such tasks. Reviewing Windows... even now a tenderfoot. Turns out Klaus Schadenfreude's constant mentioning of bigdog met his own definition of trolling, so he pretended he never said that. The Mac has a newer and better file system. Klaus Schadenfreude will never live that down. -- My Snoring Solution http://www.5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_g0w7hf_molotovcocktail http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p https://www.facebook.com/jenny.eklund Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | silverslimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 12:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7n9h4elchplh0ctnnmujjuva2pcapkua07@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #485728 |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 01:56:05 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2019-01-23, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:12:35 -0000 (UTC), RonB >><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On 2019-01-22, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB >>>><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and >>>>>>> cola on right half. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080. Can fit two good sized spreadsheets >>>>>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nice! >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg >>>>> >>>>>Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the >>>>>spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are >>>>>leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who >>>>>WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the >>>>>non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs >>>>>supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly >>>>>overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable. >>>>> >>>>>I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and >>>>>then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I >>>>>would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to >>>>>the NFL. >>>> >>>> I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing >>>> that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is >>>> involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin >>>> play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I >>>> occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in >>>> Bellator. >>> >>>I should ignore sports also. So much of it is rigged now. The L.A. Rams >>>spent a fortune for players, they're in a new market and the NFL has been >>>biased toward them all year. This was just such unbelievably obvious >>>cheating that it was pretty hard to swallow. I quit watching football a few >>>years ago but, unfortunately for me, I still look at the results and the >>>highlights. Once I break that habit I'll be a lot happier. >> >> Tell yourself that much of these sports exist primarily to distract us >> from all of the bullshit politicians do. It's easy to pass unfair >> bills and laws if the Super Bowl is there to distract everyone from >> the news. > >Like the Romans' "bread and circuses." Now it's welfare and sports. Beautifully said. It's the reason why people would benefit from completely ignoring mainstream sports and taking more of an interest in local ones if it is absolutely necessary for them to watch athletics. Go check out your local neighbourhood high school team or cheer on your family member at college since that, at least, accomplishes something in giving much needed support to a person of some worth. One of the things that always bothered me about how people refer to mainstream sports is that they include themselves in the achievements of well-compensated strangers playing for their local team. A New Yorker will say "we won" when the Knicks win an important game but you have to wonder what that person actually did. I suppose that's why some people like sports more than others; a feeling of involvement. All I can say is that when the Montreal Canadiens or the Montreal Impact win something, I get nothing out of them and therefore don't care more than I should.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web