Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #372658 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-24 18:23 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-09-25 02:20 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 123 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-24 18:23 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-25 01:24 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <mareknovotry@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 18:30 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 18:36 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-24 18:48 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-25 10:18 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-24 19:56 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-24 21:55 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 05:52 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-24 23:32 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 06:53 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 00:21 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-25 10:21 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 07:55 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 15:52 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 08:59 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 16:20 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 09:27 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 16:42 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 17:39 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 13:16 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 14:56 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 16:43 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 09:55 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 17:03 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 10:10 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 17:18 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 20:38 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 13:50 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 21:46 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 14:52 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-25 12:15 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.nospam> - 2016-09-25 18:56 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-25 18:12 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-26 08:28 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-26 12:20 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 19:17 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-26 13:50 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 20:22 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-26 18:20 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-27 02:45 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-27 08:53 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-27 14:19 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-27 10:35 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-27 14:44 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-27 10:01 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 08:45 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 11:59 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-26 13:50 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 20:44 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-26 16:57 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 22:08 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-26 18:37 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-27 02:22 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-27 08:50 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-27 13:47 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-27 09:55 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-27 14:26 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-27 10:39 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 12:04 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 08:44 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-26 13:04 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 14:25 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-09-27 05:45 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 08:32 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 18:24 +0200
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:17 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 20:03 +0200
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:04 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-27 19:44 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-28 00:49 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 07:08 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-28 14:24 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 11:53 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 17:56 +0200
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 12:25 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 18:27 +0200
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 12:30 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 20:37 +0200
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:26 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 11:54 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny Verification chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 12:02 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 10:08 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 13:57 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-28 15:58 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 12:26 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 09:00 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 12:26 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 10:04 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:09 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 14:55 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:09 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:16 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 13:58 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 16:02 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 13:16 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:16 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 09:24 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:38 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 14:34 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 18:11 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 09:37 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 07:59 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-28 13:39 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 10:23 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:35 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:46 -0700
Snit digest 315 / 2016-09-27 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-09-27 20:28 +0000
Re: Snit digest 315 / 2016-09-27 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 13:34 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-26 22:17 +0200
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 20:48 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-26 16:50 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-26 18:26 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-25 10:19 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-25 12:21 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 18:29 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 18:48 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-25 18:13 -0600
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 00:24 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 02:20 +0000
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 21:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nskmn3$p6s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373371 |
On 09/29/2016 10:24 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 10:16:28 AM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 09/28/2016 02:16 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 1:58:24 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 09/28/2016 11:30 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>> On 2016-09-28, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 09/28/2016 10:00 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>>>> Hash: SHA512 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 9:53:33 AM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2016-09-28 10:24 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-28, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If they can do it, why can't we? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why can't you stop talking about that thing, "Steve"? Oops I >>>>>>>>>> mean "Jim"? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Steve? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One of the first things you'll learn in this newsgroup is that chrisv >>>>>>>> is an imbecile. I filtered him because not one of his posts, in years, >>>>>>>> has ever shown anything resembling knowledge or insight. I get the >>>>>>>> impression I'm not the only one who's done so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Add to that... hypochrisv has done his (her?) share of talking about >>>>>>> "that thing" even after years worth of *plonks* doled out to anyone >>>>>>> and everyone. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> He/She must use an awful lot of exlax. He/She does a lot of plonking... >>>>>> into the toilet. >>>>> >>>>> He needs to loosen up a bit. He will live longer that way. >>>>> FWIW I see no harm in talking ABOUT the Prescott Parasite. The problems >>>>> begin when people talk directly TO the Prescott Parasite. >>>>> In fact the lack of direct attention will drive him into anxiety. >>>>> Let him post all the drivel he wants but ignore responding to him. If >>>>> everyone did this he would move on to more fertile trolling grounds. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Or use his own methods. Like, "I'd love to see proof of this", etc. >>> >>> In his defense, anyone can and is likely to say that on a usenet newsgroup. >>> Snit's specialty is being shown concrete proof and denying that it is proof >>> or denying that you ever showed it to him. Of course, he's also pretty good >>> at posting his version of "proof" (that all honest and honorable people agree >>> isn't), as he falsely claims "you're lying" simply because you won't swallow his >>> ridiculous and stinking red herring. Couple these glamorous traits with his >>> monumental reading comprehension problem and "chrisv''s" dehumanizing >>> label of "the thing" starts looking somewhat reasonable. >>> >> >> I know, but then my rebuttal is that his provided url is a left-wing >> biased news source that isn't accurate. He doesn't like that, but then >> he uses that method as well. Then he gets a bit ticked and calls it >> circular reasoning. From my viewpoint it is weaseling. > > With Snit there will always be word weaseling, whining, denial, hypocrisy, purposefully misinterpretation, outright lying, "psych degree" analysis, etc. This is the cost of conversing with him... as evidenced by the Google archive, as well as the comments of so many who have tried. > He must have a steady job with the CIA. It is well known on the inside that they employ people to pass out disinformation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 20:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D413307A.7EEA7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373556 |
On 9/29/16, 8:38 PM, in article nskmn3$p6s$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>> I know, but then my rebuttal is that his provided url is a left-wing >>> biased news source that isn't accurate. He doesn't like that, but then >>> he uses that method as well. Then he gets a bit ticked and calls it >>> circular reasoning. From my viewpoint it is weaseling. >> >> With Snit there will always be word weaseling, whining, denial, hypocrisy, >> purposefully misinterpretation, outright lying, "psych degree" analysis, etc. >> This is the cost of conversing with him... as evidenced by the Google >> archive, as well as the comments of so many who have tried. >> > He must have a steady job with the CIA. It is well known on the inside > that they employ people to pass out disinformation. By all means quote some of this "disinformation" I have been passing out! But there is none. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-30 14:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsmi7s$naj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373570 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/29/2016 09:56 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/29/16, 8:38 PM, in article nskmn3$p6s$1@dont-email.me, > "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > >>>> I know, but then my rebuttal is that his provided url is a >>>> left-wing biased news source that isn't accurate. He doesn't >>>> like that, but then he uses that method as well. Then he >>>> gets a bit ticked and calls it circular reasoning. From my >>>> viewpoint it is weaseling. >>> >>> With Snit there will always be word weaseling, whining, denial, >>> hypocrisy, purposefully misinterpretation, outright lying, >>> "psych degree" analysis, etc. This is the cost of conversing >>> with him... as evidenced by the Google archive, as well as the >>> comments of so many who have tried. >>> >> He must have a steady job with the CIA. It is well known on the >> inside that they employ people to pass out disinformation. > > By all means quote some of this "disinformation" I have been > passing out! > > But there is none. > > It is all in front us to read. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX7sxHAAoJEJFCJ16mfnkk/9oQAIkjG/ZYi+59KnQbKtGz+l6T 2pXgDi+fmAwXNcNI2+DJvhSfTzdi1U7fyFpiVzcys/XRBawjU9y1M0U3ntCSiq/E P0MzQOsjhc3QAOkAhtZ51Oxifp8eOrIdMhhkuHpXgt71G2r4duuDrXltT4MxP+R1 1ixaRSoR56Shq+O/laPDy3Oxy9C51BWzeTMSRxVJ0eyd9e/Vz1G2wZLMPCCC2Mu/ rKKuQD3jUZUPqiuWQuW+2wH1bKKkBnhe76s8wgdvj2VJY/4zmOIlo4l7Xf7r5stA Qy9MN824vt7VhR+pdR4Os4vPq105u9Y6g+sq7DjeaIhWAnGkhkOf0wnNLwm/m8tP z+Pit9PfgleQgPZ2hBp87d+4LJ7Rx55cqc94T6Nu6Qtm4N9Jh/aHEj6EVrA4Bba+ NlfVQlpqWKx4ymRQBEFvNBQYE0WEsqbjasJilCMYYSu9lWyn2nnBiAImOeN5tILg or6X4skLBtGa+89AE4qjD+D16PnVLt2l5yjF4c02X7dXls8MOJ7BnT9hbvw0Z9WN Oi9+XL8I6run5MRVaH40O1WzQQCiCOBI37AxtfH0rx3A3QjadZ8n4/IhISX2u2zE f+/K9g6ZYKej1EHJsSTm8cmVztz+BpcoUIdr0xpu2j/6ydqNdRCaPuLdjxkUOCfn 9TDB/TvjZpTJrIf2TeTg =bmwC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-30 18:11 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsmuvd$v75$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373802 |
On 09/30/2016 04:36 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/30/16, 1:34 PM, in article nsmi7s$naj$1@dont-email.me, > "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 09/29/2016 09:56 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 9/29/16, 8:38 PM, in article nskmn3$p6s$1@dont-email.me, >>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> I know, but then my rebuttal is that his provided url is >>>>>> a left-wing biased news source that isn't accurate. He >>>>>> doesn't like that, but then he uses that method as well. >>>>>> Then he gets a bit ticked and calls it circular >>>>>> reasoning. From my viewpoint it is weaseling. >>>>> >>>>> With Snit there will always be word weaseling, whining, >>>>> denial, hypocrisy, purposefully misinterpretation, outright >>>>> lying, "psych degree" analysis, etc. This is the cost of >>>>> conversing with him... as evidenced by the Google archive, >>>>> as well as the comments of so many who have tried. >>>>> >>>> He must have a steady job with the CIA. It is well known on >>>> the inside that they employ people to pass out >>>> disinformation. >>> >>> By all means quote some of this "disinformation" I have been >>> passing out! >>> >>> But there is none. >>> >>> >> It is all in front us to read. > > But you cannot find it. > > Here is the problem with such claims.... you are saying I posted X, > anyone with any sense can see I posted X, but YOU personally cannot > find where I posted X. > > Your claim is you are incapable... NOTHING to do with me. > > > Believe what ever you want, it is just that you weaseled out. Bye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 09:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4129176.7ED90%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373364 |
On 9/29/16, 9:16 AM, in article nsjeof$3lt$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>> He needs to loosen up a bit. He will live longer that way. FWIW I see no >>>> harm in talking ABOUT the Prescott Parasite. The problems begin when people >>>> talk directly TO the Prescott Parasite. In fact the lack of direct >>>> attention will drive him into anxiety. Let him post all the drivel he wants >>>> but ignore responding to him. If everyone did this he would move on to more >>>> fertile trolling grounds. >>>> >>> >>> Or use his own methods. Like, "I'd love to see proof of this", etc. >>> >> In his defense, anyone can and is likely to say that on a usenet newsgroup. >> Snit's specialty is being shown concrete proof and denying that it is proof Something you have no examples of. LOL! >> or denying that you ever showed it to him. Comes down to you have no idea what it means to prove something or even offer support. You point to the words of OTHERS to try to show what I have said... which makes no sense. Was cleaning up my files the other day and came across a file where I collected quotes about you for a short time... do not recall the time period, and I was able to get more derogatory quotes about you in that time than you had been able to find AND FORGE about me. But those quotes do not really mean a thing... what means something is what YOU do. And what YOU do is obsess and harass and lie and follow me from group to group and cry when I do not give you attention and blame me for your own posts and more. Those are all easy to show with quotes FROM you. >> Of course, he's also pretty good at posting his version of "proof" (that all >> honest and honorable people agree isn't), as he falsely claims "you're lying" >> simply because you won't swallow his ridiculous and stinking red herring. In other words I back my views well and then you think empty denial is somehow a good defense. Look at your lies about me hacking your account. Clear lies. I documented it well. You lied. Period. It does not matter if you deny it. Does not matter if those who troll COLA deny it. What matters is the actual data... in this case your own words. You lied. You blamed your own words on me. Again. You do that a lot. That is not a question. That is not a debate. That is fact. But you think public opinion (in a group filled with people who troll no less!) is more powerful than fact. >> Couple these glamorous traits with his monumental reading comprehension >> problem and "chrisv''s" dehumanizing label of "the thing" starts looking >> somewhat reasonable. See: you have empty insults and attacks. I have facts. Drives you crazy. > I know, but then my rebuttal is that his provided url is a left-wing biased > news source that isn't accurate. He doesn't like that, but then he uses that > method as well. Then he gets a bit ticked and calls it circular reasoning. > From my viewpoint it is weaseling. I showed actual video of Trump doing as I noted he does... assuming I am thinking of the video I think. Not going back in the thread to even check. But keep in mind when you deem all "facts" to be liberal then you are admitting that your view is not fact based, and to be face based is contrary to your views. That is a very weak position for you to take... but the modern conservative movement is pretty much a fat-denial movement. Even things as basic as climate science is generally denied. Once you get to that point you have a movement which is openly hostile to facts... one that has no value to those of us who use reason over emotion. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 07:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsgba4$d7b$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373067 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-09-27 7:53 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-09-27, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> >> On 2016-09-27 12:24 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>> >>>> On 9/26/16, 10:45 PM, in article >>>> sandman-013a58ec05ed59d01b2ffaaac8c4afc1@individual.net, >>>> "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <D40ECD4E.7E89C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, >>>>> Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/26/16, 12:50 PM, in article >>>>>> nsbu6n$d6p$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>>> >>>>>>> GreyCloud: Oh, btw, I noticed that your forgery >>>>>>> problem is now gone and the newsgroup seems a lot more >>>>>>> quieter. >>>>>> >>>>>> At risk of re-igniting the stupidity, I notice both >>>>>> Sandman and the socks and obsession with me are all >>>>>> HEAVILY reduced today. >>>>> >>>>> Also called "monday". >>>>> >>>>> Here is your current statistics: >>>> >>>> These are YOUR statistics. I have NOTHING to do with them. >>>> Nothing at all. >>> >>> Quit lying, imbecile >> >> +1 >> >> >> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease > > I think everyone in the groups snit spams have figured out his > routine. It boils down to lie, lie and lie some more. And when > confronted with factual data proving these lies of snit's, go into > "Rainman Mode" repeating gibberish over and over again in order to > blow smoke in a lame attempt to cover his lies and idiocy. > > What amazes me is that this clown, according to what others are > saying, has been running this same routine since 2004? That is > really sick. > > If everyone would ignore him, talk about him but not reply > directly to him, snit would be gone in a few weeks. He wouldn't get > his attention fix and would have no choice but to pack up his tents > and move elsewhere. > > But some people keep responding to him directly. For what reason I > do not understand. The gang over in AOL binned him and ignore him > and his socks. He has no traction over there despite him trying to > start up new circus rings. If they can do it, why can't we? We can, but a lot of people resist filtering him. They see his posts and respond to them because they still think that the sniveling Prescott Parasite has the ability to discuss things honestly. All the power to them if that's what they want to do but I don't see the point anymore especially as the rat is hated by the majority of people here. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX67CPAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+ubbwH/0s5VdGnqqrN3uZfM+99EVRT qultJoPfdUvcW9ZSjFQCMxAuC6ZbDVbNblYv7Lh34l0T9j/X2xfhO7JnRx0PH8Hp P3Lz8hpkpLM4ng6Nthay5IOnI1MVFNadyMnnKkFfv1JNx8+7R3M1ZNdbG62kyo3j RMq2FAK74bpbYMyrkoCpeNE1OhuyubgWdQnwrE+PBr5ica1W2cog5gEP3jeAHdQn Y7e0/tmc+jq1APU4OTIeCNpOCbkljYSBk4L2iV0U9BRWHSybiLmPTqIAOLfBZ7YL 9dToyVtSdXYs4A7JE422WlTpNLNHDLXBqBVa15Wp2b56Lq9oK5vrK3l1lAcuwXc= =ZUIi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 13:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e51vgfFrudvU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #373098 |
On 2016-09-28, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > > On 2016-09-27 7:53 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-09-27, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>> >>> On 2016-09-27 12:24 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>>> >>>>> On 9/26/16, 10:45 PM, in article >>>>> sandman-013a58ec05ed59d01b2ffaaac8c4afc1@individual.net, >>>>> "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <D40ECD4E.7E89C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, >>>>>> Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/26/16, 12:50 PM, in article >>>>>>> nsbu6n$d6p$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>>>> >>>>>>>> GreyCloud: Oh, btw, I noticed that your forgery >>>>>>>> problem is now gone and the newsgroup seems a lot more >>>>>>>> quieter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At risk of re-igniting the stupidity, I notice both >>>>>>> Sandman and the socks and obsession with me are all >>>>>>> HEAVILY reduced today. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also called "monday". >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is your current statistics: >>>>> >>>>> These are YOUR statistics. I have NOTHING to do with them. >>>>> Nothing at all. >>>> >>>> Quit lying, imbecile >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease >> >> I think everyone in the groups snit spams have figured out his >> routine. It boils down to lie, lie and lie some more. And when >> confronted with factual data proving these lies of snit's, go into >> "Rainman Mode" repeating gibberish over and over again in order to >> blow smoke in a lame attempt to cover his lies and idiocy. >> >> What amazes me is that this clown, according to what others are >> saying, has been running this same routine since 2004? That is >> really sick. >> >> If everyone would ignore him, talk about him but not reply >> directly to him, snit would be gone in a few weeks. He wouldn't get >> his attention fix and would have no choice but to pack up his tents >> and move elsewhere. >> >> But some people keep responding to him directly. For what reason I >> do not understand. The gang over in AOL binned him and ignore him >> and his socks. He has no traction over there despite him trying to >> start up new circus rings. If they can do it, why can't we? > > We can, but a lot of people resist filtering him. They see his posts > and respond to them because they still think that the sniveling > Prescott Parasite has the ability to discuss things honestly. All the > power to them if that's what they want to do but I don't see the point > anymore especially as the rat is hated by the majority of people here. > > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease He will become honest. Snit is wired to be dishonest and his main goal is to cause disruption and get attention. Trying to discuss anything, and I mean /anything/ serious with this kook is a waste of time. It will /always/ turn into a mega thread circus. Every single time. And that is what he expects and craves. The bigger the circus, the more satisfied snit is. Ignore him and he will find another group to shit on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 10:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsgjou$aei$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373121 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-09-28 9:39 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-09-28, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> >> On 2016-09-27 7:53 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>> On 2016-09-27, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2016-09-27 12:24 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/26/16, 10:45 PM, in article >>>>>> sandman-013a58ec05ed59d01b2ffaaac8c4afc1@individual.net, >>>>>> "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article >>>>>>> <D40ECD4E.7E89C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9/26/16, 12:50 PM, in article >>>>>>>> nsbu6n$d6p$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> GreyCloud: Oh, btw, I noticed that your forgery >>>>>>>>> problem is now gone and the newsgroup seems a lot >>>>>>>>> more quieter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At risk of re-igniting the stupidity, I notice both >>>>>>>> Sandman and the socks and obsession with me are all >>>>>>>> HEAVILY reduced today. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also called "monday". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is your current statistics: >>>>>> >>>>>> These are YOUR statistics. I have NOTHING to do with >>>>>> them. Nothing at all. >>>>> >>>>> Quit lying, imbecile >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> >>>> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease >>> >>> I think everyone in the groups snit spams have figured out his >>> routine. It boils down to lie, lie and lie some more. And when >>> confronted with factual data proving these lies of snit's, go >>> into "Rainman Mode" repeating gibberish over and over again in >>> order to blow smoke in a lame attempt to cover his lies and >>> idiocy. >>> >>> What amazes me is that this clown, according to what others are >>> saying, has been running this same routine since 2004? That >>> is really sick. >>> >>> If everyone would ignore him, talk about him but not reply >>> directly to him, snit would be gone in a few weeks. He wouldn't >>> get his attention fix and would have no choice but to pack up >>> his tents and move elsewhere. >>> >>> But some people keep responding to him directly. For what >>> reason I do not understand. The gang over in AOL binned him and >>> ignore him and his socks. He has no traction over there despite >>> him trying to start up new circus rings. If they can do it, why >>> can't we? >> >> We can, but a lot of people resist filtering him. They see his >> posts and respond to them because they still think that the >> sniveling Prescott Parasite has the ability to discuss things >> honestly. All the power to them if that's what they want to do >> but I don't see the point anymore especially as the rat is hated >> by the majority of people here. >> >> >> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease > > He will become honest. Snit is wired to be dishonest and his main > goal is to cause disruption and get attention. Trying to discuss > anything, and I mean /anything/ serious with this kook is a waste > of time. It will /always/ turn into a mega thread circus. Every > single time. And that is what he expects and craves. The bigger the > circus, the more satisfied snit is. > > Ignore him and he will find another group to shit on. He can go to rec.sport-pro-wrestling if he wants to troll. If that place is anything like it was in the early 2000s, everyone has an opinion and everyone seems intent on trolling. He'd be happy there. He'll be able to argue why some wrestler no one has ever heard of is the best athlete of the modern era. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX69JpAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+ui+4H/jaTgv6kQPUi2cfcuy+wZoAO wojvwHV4Ms7U37pV2ClJB1YXDck2nSGgoTZDg4ljVzpCRNKFSJUcEF1vrW1Oft9q ItQ5jSgI7lGWOY1/Zskx3biBYyVCpCFfP3TZd6G4fMDsQoUYAHhZ0Pek+1dKYdfS p/SLYhYyL/rg/6rabqMYBWo7qGbeg+O7PLrqT+t2ub/aCQ8ZQX5rg450kafZ4RdB RVwCtzavHeoHLvQR8vBnqKjzN4uRdpEbT+dqCpTP/tVt6zKSy/BpoJD0qKTqgiRe dLHESIEXPdTMRIm+jIj7NADSsr246TN6Rdbw2kaZ5+RE4h0KElBy0zl/YqFWlps= =KmUQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 08:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D411315D.7EB5E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373121 |
On 9/28/16, 6:39 AM, in article e51vgfFrudvU2@mid.individual.net, "Jim Polaski" <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> wrote: >>> If everyone would ignore him, talk about him but not reply >>> directly to him, snit would be gone in a few weeks. He wouldn't get >>> his attention fix and would have no choice but to pack up his tents >>> and move elsewhere. >>> >>> But some people keep responding to him directly. For what reason I >>> do not understand. The gang over in AOL binned him and ignore him >>> and his socks. He has no traction over there despite him trying to >>> start up new circus rings. If they can do it, why can't we? >> >> We can, but a lot of people resist filtering him. They see his posts >> and respond to them because they still think that the sniveling >> Prescott Parasite has the ability to discuss things honestly. All the >> power to them if that's what they want to do but I don't see the point >> anymore especially as the rat is hated by the majority of people here. >> >> >> - -- >> Silver Slimer >> Islam is a disease > > He will become honest. Snit is wired to be dishonest and his main goal > is to cause disruption and get attention. Trying to discuss anything, > and I mean /anything/ serious with this kook is a waste of time. It will > /always/ turn into a mega thread circus. Every single time. And that is > what he expects and craves. > The bigger the circus, the more satisfied snit is. > > Ignore him and he will find another group to shit on. I am not your personal Captain Kirk: <https://goo.gl/ZMXDjt>! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 08:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D41133DF.7EB6F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373098 |
On 9/28/16, 4:59 AM, in article nsgba4$d7b$3@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >> If everyone would ignore him, talk about him but not reply >> directly to him, snit would be gone in a few weeks. He wouldn't get >> his attention fix and would have no choice but to pack up his tents >> and move elsewhere. >> >> But some people keep responding to him directly. For what reason I >> do not understand. The gang over in AOL binned him and ignore him >> and his socks. He has no traction over there despite him trying to >> start up new circus rings. If they can do it, why can't we? > > We can, but a lot of people resist filtering him. They see his posts > and respond to them because they still think that the sniveling > Prescott Parasite has the ability to discuss things honestly. All the > power to them if that's what they want to do but I don't see the point > anymore especially as the rat is hated by the majority of people here. You, as much as anyone, talk about me non-stop. I am not your personal Captain Kirk: <https://goo.gl/ZMXDjt>! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 20:28 +0000 |
| Subject | Snit digest 315 / 2016-09-27 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-52b8e969a7f5014a9b9c28607e77bd74@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372965 |
In article <D40FDF23.7E97C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: > [1894] These are YOUR statistics. [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > [1894] I have NOTHING to do with them. Nothing at all. [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 0 199 | lying/lie 0 324 | incest 0 2 sex 0 0 | honorable 0 8 | honest 0 51 run 0 14 | css 0 17 | tilde 0 0 -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 13:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 315 / 2016-09-27 |
| Message-ID | <D41025CF.7EA29%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373037 |
Sandman is STILL tracking his own lies and trolling.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-26 22:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nsbvp2$jf3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372880 |
Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-09-26, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > > // snip > >> I know. As Marek so aptly put it: Linux may not be for you. >> At least I'm trying and found that OpenSuse comes the closest to windows >> without the Orwellian side effects. Cortana, for example, needs to >> store your interactions profile on MS server so that it can better serve >> you,... but that can also lead to possible other privacy problems. >> Also, their EULA pretty much says that their corporate partners may look >> into your computer to see how best to market to you (advertise that is). >> >> So far so good. >> >> Anyway, shouldn't a router box be able to stop MS and their partners >> from snooping, or has MS figured out a way to get around that? > > Ah, come on... :) I'm expecting more from a Solaris guy... > > If I'm on your machine already, meaning I have code running in your > machine, regardless of the OS... Can't I just open an external site via > port 80? You use a browser don't ya? > > So once I have done that, that million dollar firewall you have is > worthless. The firewall stops the outside from initiating a conversation > on the inside, correct? But you're on the inside. And you start up a > conversation with the outside all the time. See what I mean? So far, thats right. *Any* firewall is completely useless if the connection is legit. Connecting to Apache from the outside is such a case. Thats one of the reasons the windows firewall is rarely able to prevent an attack > So how hard is it for me to say write added code into a script that > performs a reverse ssh into my box giving me access to you? If you're > running my script, aren't you opening the pipe to me? So you're making > an outside call. Does your current firewall prevent such a call? > The firewall would have a hard time preventing that except it will inspect the IP packets. Lots of over head and generally not wanted because of that. When a connection to port 80 / Apache is already established it is up to the config of Apache to prevent such things For example: The *vast* majority of linux servers being hacked is via legitimate connections with a service being vulnerable (i.e. old Apache). The linux OS itself is extremely hard to hack into, but applications, especially such big ones like Apache (or PHP, run by Apache) might contain a problem where you can elevate rights
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-26 20:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <N4idnfV3QdcPFHTKnZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #372884 |
On 2016-09-26, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: > >> On 2016-09-26, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> >> // snip >> >>> I know. As Marek so aptly put it: Linux may not be for you. >>> At least I'm trying and found that OpenSuse comes the closest to windows >>> without the Orwellian side effects. Cortana, for example, needs to >>> store your interactions profile on MS server so that it can better serve >>> you,... but that can also lead to possible other privacy problems. >>> Also, their EULA pretty much says that their corporate partners may look >>> into your computer to see how best to market to you (advertise that is). >>> >>> So far so good. >>> >>> Anyway, shouldn't a router box be able to stop MS and their partners >>> from snooping, or has MS figured out a way to get around that? >> >> Ah, come on... :) I'm expecting more from a Solaris guy... >> >> If I'm on your machine already, meaning I have code running in your >> machine, regardless of the OS... Can't I just open an external site via >> port 80? You use a browser don't ya? >> >> So once I have done that, that million dollar firewall you have is >> worthless. The firewall stops the outside from initiating a conversation >> on the inside, correct? But you're on the inside. And you start up a >> conversation with the outside all the time. See what I mean? > > So far, thats right. *Any* firewall is completely useless if the connection > is legit. Connecting to Apache from the outside is such a case. Thats one of > the reasons the windows firewall is rarely able to prevent an attack > >> So how hard is it for me to say write added code into a script that >> performs a reverse ssh into my box giving me access to you? If you're >> running my script, aren't you opening the pipe to me? So you're making >> an outside call. Does your current firewall prevent such a call? >> > > The firewall would have a hard time preventing that except it will inspect > the IP packets. Lots of over head and generally not wanted because of that. > > When a connection to port 80 / Apache is already established it is up to the > config of Apache to prevent such things > > For example: The *vast* majority of linux servers being hacked is via > legitimate connections with a service being vulnerable (i.e. old Apache). > The linux OS itself is extremely hard to hack into, but applications, > especially such big ones like Apache (or PHP, run by Apache) might contain a > problem where you can elevate rights Privilege escalation. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-26 16:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsc1m5$p1n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372874 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2016-09-26 2:20 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 09/26/2016 06:28 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> On 2016-09-25 8:12 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 09/25/2016 12:56 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:15:28 -0600, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 09/24/2016 10:55 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-09-25, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 09/24/2016 07:23 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>>> There is someone attempting to fool users on aol that I am them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> my address has always been marek.novotny@marspolar.com. This is a >>>>>>>> domain I own. You may use older posts from me as your verification. >>>>>>>> You may also use my github as your verification as that also shows >>>>>>>> not only my correct email address, but also my join date which is >>>>>>>> January 9th, 2015. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anyone posting using any other address is not me and should be in >>>>>>>> your kill file / score file. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Add pgp to your posts. >>>>>> >>>>>> My thinking is that no one uses it, and thus can't really verify >>>>>> anyway. >>>>>> I've set it up in the past (using thunderbird) and no one really >>>>>> seems >>>>>> to use it. I had joined a mail list where we tried it out and offered >>>>>> help to others for it and that was pretty much the only place it ever >>>>>> saw any action. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you setup to use it? >>>>>> >>>>> I did in the past and it stopped him from forging my posts. With a >>>>> pgp >>>>> style post it flags others a lot easier by observation that using my >>>>> name without the pgp signature isn't me doing the posting, just a >>>>> forger. >>>> >>>> By the way, I just installed Linux (Ubuntu 16.04) and I get the >>>> impression that the reason videos didn't work is because you didn't >>>> enable Firefox to play DRM content. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I already checked that one too. Still no go. >> >> I'm starting to think that Ubuntu is a problem. I've since removed it in >> favour of Windows (again) because too many things weren't working right >> inside of it. For one, Seahorse refused to respond to any GnuPG task. >> Printing was still an issue (it always will be) and graphics were >> producing some weird effects even though the settings were correct and >> the proprietary driver was installed. I give up, I seriously do. >> >>> Anyway, Chrome does work well. I tried Ubuntu 16.04, but for me it was >>> hard to get used to, so I went for OpenSuse and noticed that the older >>> 13.2 is much different than the later 13.2. A bit odd, but then it >>> works well with my 1920 x 1080 monitor. The others wouldn't totally go >>> full screen, but OpenSuse does. Not sure what that issue was. >> >> There is just a severe lack of consistency that I honestly can't stand. >> > I know. As Marek so aptly put it: Linux may not be for you. > At least I'm trying and found that OpenSuse comes the closest to windows > without the Orwellian side effects. Cortana, for example, needs to > store your interactions profile on MS server so that it can better serve > you,... but that can also lead to possible other privacy problems. Also, > their EULA pretty much says that their corporate partners may look into > your computer to see how best to market to you (advertise that is). I couldn't even get OpenSuse to boot from the USB key I put it on. I used unetbootin as I did for any other distribution but this one decided not to run despite all of the BIOS settings being correct. > So far so good. > > Anyway, shouldn't a router box be able to stop MS and their partners > from snooping, or has MS figured out a way to get around that? Microsoft has made sure that no modification of the hosts file will prevent the operating system from communicating with its servers... that should give you an indication. You can block those servers on the router, but I think that Microsoft has a way around that block anyway. -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-26 18:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsceb8$2dh$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372889 |
On 09/26/2016 02:50 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-09-26 2:20 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 09/26/2016 06:28 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> On 2016-09-25 8:12 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 09/25/2016 12:56 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:15:28 -0600, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 09/24/2016 10:55 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-09-25, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 09/24/2016 07:23 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>>>> There is someone attempting to fool users on aol that I am them. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> my address has always been marek.novotny@marspolar.com. This is a >>>>>>>>> domain I own. You may use older posts from me as your verification. >>>>>>>>> You may also use my github as your verification as that also shows >>>>>>>>> not only my correct email address, but also my join date which is >>>>>>>>> January 9th, 2015. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anyone posting using any other address is not me and should be in >>>>>>>>> your kill file / score file. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Add pgp to your posts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My thinking is that no one uses it, and thus can't really verify >>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>> I've set it up in the past (using thunderbird) and no one really >>>>>>> seems >>>>>>> to use it. I had joined a mail list where we tried it out and offered >>>>>>> help to others for it and that was pretty much the only place it ever >>>>>>> saw any action. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you setup to use it? >>>>>>> >>>>>> I did in the past and it stopped him from forging my posts. With a >>>>>> pgp >>>>>> style post it flags others a lot easier by observation that using my >>>>>> name without the pgp signature isn't me doing the posting, just a >>>>>> forger. >>>>> >>>>> By the way, I just installed Linux (Ubuntu 16.04) and I get the >>>>> impression that the reason videos didn't work is because you didn't >>>>> enable Firefox to play DRM content. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I already checked that one too. Still no go. >>> >>> I'm starting to think that Ubuntu is a problem. I've since removed it in >>> favour of Windows (again) because too many things weren't working right >>> inside of it. For one, Seahorse refused to respond to any GnuPG task. >>> Printing was still an issue (it always will be) and graphics were >>> producing some weird effects even though the settings were correct and >>> the proprietary driver was installed. I give up, I seriously do. >>> >>>> Anyway, Chrome does work well. I tried Ubuntu 16.04, but for me it was >>>> hard to get used to, so I went for OpenSuse and noticed that the older >>>> 13.2 is much different than the later 13.2. A bit odd, but then it >>>> works well with my 1920 x 1080 monitor. The others wouldn't totally go >>>> full screen, but OpenSuse does. Not sure what that issue was. >>> >>> There is just a severe lack of consistency that I honestly can't stand. >>> >> I know. As Marek so aptly put it: Linux may not be for you. >> At least I'm trying and found that OpenSuse comes the closest to windows >> without the Orwellian side effects. Cortana, for example, needs to >> store your interactions profile on MS server so that it can better serve >> you,... but that can also lead to possible other privacy problems. Also, >> their EULA pretty much says that their corporate partners may look into >> your computer to see how best to market to you (advertise that is). > > I couldn't even get OpenSuse to boot from the USB key I put it on. I > used unetbootin as I did for any other distribution but this one decided > not to run despite all of the BIOS settings being correct. > You could google for VMware player, as it is free, and maybe it should solve your problems. It integrates your current printing, internet connection, sound generation, display, hard drive, you name it and it should work with most linux distros. >> So far so good. >> >> Anyway, shouldn't a router box be able to stop MS and their partners >> from snooping, or has MS figured out a way to get around that? > > Microsoft has made sure that no modification of the hosts file will > prevent the operating system from communicating with its servers... that > should give you an indication. You can block those servers on the > router, but I think that Microsoft has a way around that block anyway. > I believe it is built into the os. You may just have to wait and keep an ear open when somebody figures a way of blocking corporate snoops from your PC.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-25 10:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ns8mdv$qe1$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372672 |
On 2016-09-24 9:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 09/24/2016 07:23 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >> There is someone attempting to fool users on aol that I am them. >> >> my address has always been marek.novotny@marspolar.com. This is a domain >> I own. You may use older posts from me as your verification. You may >> also use my github as your verification as that also shows not only my >> correct email address, but also my join date which is January 9th, 2015. >> >> Anyone posting using any other address is not me and should be in your >> kill file / score file. >> > Add pgp to your posts. Yeah, it's not a bad idea. I think we should all do that actually. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-25 12:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ns94jm$cj9$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372701 |
On 09/25/2016 08:19 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-09-24 9:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 09/24/2016 07:23 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>> There is someone attempting to fool users on aol that I am them. >>> >>> my address has always been marek.novotny@marspolar.com. This is a domain >>> I own. You may use older posts from me as your verification. You may >>> also use my github as your verification as that also shows not only my >>> correct email address, but also my join date which is January 9th, 2015. >>> >>> Anyone posting using any other address is not me and should be in your >>> kill file / score file. >>> >> Add pgp to your posts. > > Yeah, it's not a bad idea. I think we should all do that actually. > Even tho it may not be complete as owl suggests it wouldn't, it's enough because this particular forger isn't smart enough to forge the pgp stuff.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-25 18:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oZmdnfqQAYIcinXKnZ2dnUU7-S2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #372756 |
On 2016-09-25, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > On 09/25/2016 08:19 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> On 2016-09-24 9:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 09/24/2016 07:23 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>> There is someone attempting to fool users on aol that I am them. >>>> >>>> my address has always been marek.novotny@marspolar.com. This is a domain >>>> I own. You may use older posts from me as your verification. You may >>>> also use my github as your verification as that also shows not only my >>>> correct email address, but also my join date which is January 9th, 2015. >>>> >>>> Anyone posting using any other address is not me and should be in your >>>> kill file / score file. >>>> >>> Add pgp to your posts. >> >> Yeah, it's not a bad idea. I think we should all do that actually. >> > Even tho it may not be complete as owl suggests it wouldn't, it's enough > because this particular forger isn't smart enough to forge the pgp stuff. Do you or owl have experience with setting up the conf file in GnuPG? Specifically how do I add a keyserver? -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-25 18:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjguea008g.ge@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #372758 |
Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> On 2016-09-25, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>> On 09/25/2016 08:19 AM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>> On 2016-09-24 9:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
>>>> On 09/24/2016 07:23 PM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>> There is someone attempting to fool users on aol that I am them.
>>>>>
>>>>> my address has always been marek.novotny@marspolar.com. This is a domain
>>>>> I own. You may use older posts from me as your verification. You may
>>>>> also use my github as your verification as that also shows not only my
>>>>> correct email address, but also my join date which is January 9th, 2015.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone posting using any other address is not me and should be in your
>>>>> kill file / score file.
>>>>>
>>>> Add pgp to your posts.
>>>
>>> Yeah, it's not a bad idea. I think we should all do that actually.
>>>
>> Even tho it may not be complete as owl suggests it wouldn't, it's enough
>> because this particular forger isn't smart enough to forge the pgp stuff.
>
> Do you or owl have experience with setting up the conf file in GnuPG?
> Specifically how do I add a keyserver?
>
I've never messed with keyservers, but looking at gpg.conf it looks
like you just add (or uncomment) a keyserver line.
------------
# Most users just set the name and type of their preferred keyserver.
# Note that most servers (with the notable exception of
# ldap://keyserver.pgp.com) synchronize changes with each other. Note
# also that a single server name may actually point to multiple
# servers via DNS round-robin. hkp://keys.gnupg.net is an example of
# such a "server", which spreads the load over a number of physical
# servers. To see the IP address of the server actually used, you may use
# the "--keyserver-options debug".
#keyserver hkp://keys.gnupg.net
#keyserver mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.nl.pgp.net
#keyserver ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
# Common options for keyserver functions:
------------
And then i guess, in gpg:
--send-keys key IDs
Similar to --export but sends the keys to a keyserver. Finger‐
prints may be used instead of key IDs. Option --keyserver must
be used to give the name of this keyserver. Don't send your com‐
plete keyring to a keyserver --- select only those keys which
are new or changed by you. If no key IDs are given, gpg does
nothing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web