Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 382 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:51 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:07 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:32 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 15:22 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:37 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:14 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:21 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:29 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:51 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:17 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:01 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:27 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:17 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:41 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:06 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 00:13 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:14 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:10 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:56 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:42 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:29 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:41 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:08 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:17 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:32 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-26 11:27 -0500
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:36 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:45 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:52 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 13:43 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:18 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:39 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:24 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 00:09 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:29 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:26 -0600
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:21 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:46 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:42 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 00:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:20 +0200
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:04 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:23 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:39 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:09 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:27 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 21:58 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:28 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:15 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 22:22 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-27 19:10 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 03:20 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:35 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:16 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:03 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:19 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:34 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 19:03 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-27 15:30 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:20 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:24 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:01 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:42 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 07:39 -0700
Re: Another day William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-28 16:22 +0100
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 09:50 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 15:29 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 20:16 +0000
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 17:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:19 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:18 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:44 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:56 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:59 -0400
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:16 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:08 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 09:06 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 08:12 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 11:50 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 19:22 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 16:57 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 18:39 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 15:43 -0700
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:12 +0000
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:15 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:09 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 20:52 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-29 19:34 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:49 +0200
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:46 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:21 -0700
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 02:26 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-30 09:16 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 15:26 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-28 12:38 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:16 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:20 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:35 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 01:50 +0200
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 20:13 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:19 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:35 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:15 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 11:02 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 08:08 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:21 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:08 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:32 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:39 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:04 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:39 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:53 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:26 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:23 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:29 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:19 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:04 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:40 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:42 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 14:08 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:18 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:57 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:31 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:44 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:25 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:40 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:14 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:50 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:39 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:44 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:02 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:59 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:25 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:16 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:16 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:34 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:09 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:08 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:10 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:28 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:12 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:11 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:20 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:33 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:45 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:54 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 10:54 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 12:03 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:59 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:13 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:29 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:33 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:23 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:43 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:53 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:36 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:18 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:47 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:48 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 05:06 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:34 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:14 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:00 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:58 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:31 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:56 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 20:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:15 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:44 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:48 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:57 -0400
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 06:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:35 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:17 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:03 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:09 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:33 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:14 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:10 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:24 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:46 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:54 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:47 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:45 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:12 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:09 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:07 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:23 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:44 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:05 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:38 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:26 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:42 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:47 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:04 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:20 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:36 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:37 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:56 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:16 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:22 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:37 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:51 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:54 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:59 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:01 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 21:19 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:56 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:29 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:22 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:58 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:44 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:43 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:15 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:42 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400
Page 10 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 20 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9699349a-e5a4-4bf7-a78a-39217a9db173@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367066 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:12:10 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:24 AM, in article > -sednQmXyra88F3KnZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" > <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > > > On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > > > // snip > > > >> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... > > > > Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? > > I am into what honesty and integrity... It's "interesting", then, that you have managed to convince so many people that you aren't, isn't it? > you and your herd are offended > by that! So are many of the others who troll COLA. And what about the rest on this (incomplete) list? <http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html> > It is interesting how much those of you who troll are willing to lie about > me because you cannot find actual significant flaws with my views. It's much more "interesting" why you expect anyone to believe that all the people who have come out "against" you are all 'lying'. ALL of them. How does that work again?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 21:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nplo6m$ni6$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366503 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> On 08/24/16 10:05, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 7:17 AM, in article hgjds0.3a88b@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> This election is going to be a Trump landslide. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're delusional. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hillary is not Obama. Hillary can't get anybody to the polls. >>>> The Bernie people hate her. The blacks don't care about her. >>>> Trump's people are more fired-up than the Berntards. We will >>>> be out in record numbers. Trump landslide. >>>> >>>> http://ow.ly/DFO6303xA1D >>>> >>> Trump has almost no chance of winning. His only chance is that he is >>> running against the ONLY other person on the national stage with an >>> almost equal level of lack of trust and dislike. >>> >>> The two parties picked the worst candidates they could... though the >>> Republicans really had no good choices. Somehow they managed to make Jeb >>> Bush look decent... an amazing feat! >>> >>> >> https://www.sbstatesman.com/2016/02/23/political-science-professor- forecasts-t >> rump-as-general-election-winner/ >> >> http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/24/political-science-professor-odds-of- presiden >> t-trump-range-between-97-and-99/ >> >> http://www.aol.com/article/2016/02/26/professor-if-trump-gets-the- nomination-h >> ell-win-in-november/21319450/ >> >> Seems like these people say otherwise. >> > What "these people"? They all point back to one person... and here is his > professional page at the university they claim he represents: > > <http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/polisci/professors/norpoth.html> > > With that said, Trump did better in the primaries than I expected... but > he gamed the system well, trolling the media and working the fact he was > different from a mass of others who did not differentiate themselves well. > > Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you > think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to > troll them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring > the but they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. > I'd say that all trump really accomplished is to expose the democratic fraudsters for who they really are. He also exposed the rats in the republican circle as traiters and turncoats... and who does that leave left? The rest of us peons. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E3C1D8.7A06D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366605 |
On 8/24/16, 8:20 PM, in article nplo6m$ni6$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> Seems like these people say otherwise. >>> >> What "these people"? They all point back to one person... and here is his >> professional page at the university they claim he represents: >> >> <http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/polisci/professors/norpoth.html> >> >> With that said, Trump did better in the primaries than I expected... but >> he gamed the system well, trolling the media and working the fact he was >> different from a mass of others who did not differentiate themselves well. >> >> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you >> think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to >> troll them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring >> the but they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. >> > I'd say that all trump really accomplished is to expose the democratic > fraudsters for who they really are. He also exposed the rats in the > republican circle as traiters and turncoats... and who does that leave left? > > The rest of us peons. How did he expose them? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 14:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npnj16$l0v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366620 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/24/16, 8:20 PM, in article nplo6m$ni6$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >>>> Seems like these people say otherwise. >>>> >>> What "these people"? They all point back to one person... and here is >>> his professional page at the university they claim he represents: >>> >>> <http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/polisci/professors/norpoth.html> >>> >>> With that said, Trump did better in the primaries than I expected... but >>> he gamed the system well, trolling the media and working the fact he was >>> different from a mass of others who did not differentiate themselves >>> well. >>> >>> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do >>> you think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump >>> to troll them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics >>> bring the but they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. >>> >> I'd say that all trump really accomplished is to expose the democratic >> fraudsters for who they really are. He also exposed the rats in the >> republican circle as traiters and turncoats... and who does that leave >> left? >> >> The rest of us peons. > > How did he expose them? > > Easy, they did it to themselves out their hatred towards trump. At least now, we know who the unamerican traitors are. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E49E03.7A20E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366799 |
On 8/25/16, 1:04 PM, in article npnj16$l0v$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > Snit wrote: > >> On 8/24/16, 8:20 PM, in article nplo6m$ni6$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Seems like these people say otherwise. >>>>> >>>> What "these people"? They all point back to one person... and here is >>>> his professional page at the university they claim he represents: >>>> >>>> <http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/polisci/professors/norpoth.html> >>>> >>>> With that said, Trump did better in the primaries than I expected... but >>>> he gamed the system well, trolling the media and working the fact he was >>>> different from a mass of others who did not differentiate themselves >>>> well. >>>> >>>> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do >>>> you think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump >>>> to troll them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics >>>> bring the but they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. >>>> >>> I'd say that all trump really accomplished is to expose the democratic >>> fraudsters for who they really are. He also exposed the rats in the >>> republican circle as traiters and turncoats... and who does that leave >>> left? >>> >>> The rest of us peons. >> >> How did he expose them? >> > Easy, they did it to themselves out their hatred towards trump. > At least now, we know who the unamerican traitors are. People do not like Trump because he is a horrid choice for president... that is not "exposing" then other than having one area where they agree. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 18:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npo0rg$2kd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366802 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/25/16, 1:04 PM, in article npnj16$l0v$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> Snit wrote: >> >>> On 8/24/16, 8:20 PM, in article nplo6m$ni6$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Seems like these people say otherwise. >>>>>> >>>>> What "these people"? They all point back to one person... and here is >>>>> his professional page at the university they claim he represents: >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/polisci/professors/norpoth.html> >>>>> >>>>> With that said, Trump did better in the primaries than I expected... >>>>> but he gamed the system well, trolling the media and working the fact >>>>> he was different from a mass of others who did not differentiate >>>>> themselves well. >>>>> >>>>> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do >>>>> you think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow >>>>> Trump to troll them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his >>>>> antics bring the but they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not >>>>> work. >>>>> >>>> I'd say that all trump really accomplished is to expose the democratic >>>> fraudsters for who they really are. He also exposed the rats in the >>>> republican circle as traiters and turncoats... and who does that leave >>>> left? >>>> >>>> The rest of us peons. >>> >>> How did he expose them? >>> >> Easy, they did it to themselves out their hatred towards trump. >> At least now, we know who the unamerican traitors are. > > People do not like Trump because he is a horrid choice for president... > that is not "exposing" then other than having one area where they agree. > Then why so many republicans don't want him then? All of the candidates on the republican side are the traitors to this country. They are the ones in cohoots with Obama on the TPP which is classified. Why is it classified? -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4E6E2.7A2F0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366894 |
On 8/25/16, 5:00 PM, in article npo0rg$2kd$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>> How did he expose them? >>>> >>> Easy, they did it to themselves out their hatred towards trump. >>> At least now, we know who the unamerican traitors are. >> >> People do not like Trump because he is a horrid choice for president... >> that is not "exposing" then other than having one area where they agree. >> > > Then why so many republicans don't want him then? He is the end result of their games... and they do not like it. > All of the candidates on the republican side are the traitors to this > country. They are the ones in cohoots with Obama on the TPP which is > classified. Why is it classified? Is it? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 23:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npokos$ejj$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366914 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/25/16, 5:00 PM, in article npo0rg$2kd$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >>>>> How did he expose them? >>>>> >>>> Easy, they did it to themselves out their hatred towards trump. >>>> At least now, we know who the unamerican traitors are. >>> >>> People do not like Trump because he is a horrid choice for president... >>> that is not "exposing" then other than having one area where they agree. >>> >> >> Then why so many republicans don't want him then? > > He is the end result of their games... and they do not like it. > >> All of the candidates on the republican side are the traitors to this >> country. They are the ones in cohoots with Obama on the TPP which is >> classified. Why is it classified? > > Is it? > Yes, it is classified as top secret. Only certain politicians are allowed to read it. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nppch4$nh1$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366954 |
On 2016-08-26 1:40 AM, GreyCloud wrote: > Snit wrote: > >> On 8/25/16, 5:00 PM, in article npo0rg$2kd$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> How did he expose them? >>>>>> >>>>> Easy, they did it to themselves out their hatred towards trump. >>>>> At least now, we know who the unamerican traitors are. >>>> >>>> People do not like Trump because he is a horrid choice for president... >>>> that is not "exposing" then other than having one area where they agree. >>>> >>> >>> Then why so many republicans don't want him then? >> >> He is the end result of their games... and they do not like it. >> >>> All of the candidates on the republican side are the traitors to this >>> country. They are the ones in cohoots with Obama on the TPP which is >>> classified. Why is it classified? >> >> Is it? >> > Yes, it is classified as top secret. Only certain politicians are allowed > to read it. It is incredibly unethical for politicians to vote for and apply such an agreement on citizens who voted them in without allowing those people to get an idea of what is about to be applied. I can't imagine how and why such behaviour became legal. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 08:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5B05B.7A3B0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366954 |
On 8/25/16, 10:40 PM, in article npokos$ejj$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > Snit wrote: > >> On 8/25/16, 5:00 PM, in article npo0rg$2kd$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> How did he expose them? >>>>>> >>>>> Easy, they did it to themselves out their hatred towards trump. >>>>> At least now, we know who the unamerican traitors are. >>>> >>>> People do not like Trump because he is a horrid choice for president... >>>> that is not "exposing" then other than having one area where they agree. >>>> >>> >>> Then why so many republicans don't want him then? >> >> He is the end result of their games... and they do not like it. >> >>> All of the candidates on the republican side are the traitors to this >>> country. They are the ones in cohoots with Obama on the TPP which is >>> classified. Why is it classified? >> >> Is it? >> > Yes, it is classified as top secret. Only certain politicians are allowed > to read it. Looking into it briefly, seems the drafts are classified but the bill will not be. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 11:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nppv2j$pjj$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367019 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/25/16, 10:40 PM, in article npokos$ejj$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> Snit wrote: >> >>> On 8/25/16, 5:00 PM, in article npo0rg$2kd$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> How did he expose them? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Easy, they did it to themselves out their hatred towards trump. >>>>>> At least now, we know who the unamerican traitors are. >>>>> >>>>> People do not like Trump because he is a horrid choice for >>>>> president... that is not "exposing" then other than having one area >>>>> where they agree. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Then why so many republicans don't want him then? >>> >>> He is the end result of their games... and they do not like it. >>> >>>> All of the candidates on the republican side are the traitors to this >>>> country. They are the ones in cohoots with Obama on the TPP which is >>>> classified. Why is it classified? >>> >>> Is it? >>> >> Yes, it is classified as top secret. Only certain politicians are >> allowed to read it. > > Looking into it briefly, seems the drafts are classified but the bill will > not be. > > That depends on the how the bill is written. It may have a reference to the classified portion of the bill. Remember when Nancy Pelosi said, "You don't need to read the bill, you can pass it and read about it later." I'm afraid it will work this way again. http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/11/politics/trade-deal-secrecy-tpp/ Classifications that I was trained in and discussed were these and why: Confidential may have embarassing facts that can cause trouble. Secret may be detrimental to the national security of this country. Top Secret will cause a war and threaten national security. So we have ask which level of classification did TPP get? If it is Top Secret, like I have heard, yes it could cause a war. We have to ask why is it classified in the first place? How come the public isn't told what is in the TPP bill? -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 11:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npkmms$ec6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366470 |
On 08/24/16 07:51, DFS wrote: > On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >> This election is going to be a Trump landslide. > > > You're delusional. > > Hehe... how come Hillary had to pay people to attend her conventions then just to fill up the hall?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 14:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npknr6$i3q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366499 |
On 8/24/2016 1:49 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 08/24/16 07:51, DFS wrote: >> On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> >>> This election is going to be a Trump landslide. >> >> >> You're delusional. >> >> > Hehe... how come Hillary had to pay people to attend her conventions > then just to fill up the hall? Bullshit. You're just full of lies and idiocy and off-the-wall bullshit. Regardless, a lying trainwreck like Trump is more entertaining than Clinton.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 21:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nplo29$ni6$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366504 |
DFS wrote: > On 8/24/2016 1:49 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 08/24/16 07:51, DFS wrote: >>> On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> >>> >>>> This election is going to be a Trump landslide. >>> >>> >>> You're delusional. >>> >>> >> Hehe... how come Hillary had to pay people to attend her conventions >> then just to fill up the hall? > > > Bullshit. You're just full of lies and idiocy and off-the-wall bullshit. > Guffaw!!! It is true tho and has been reported on a few news outlets in other countries. LOL!!! Looks like we have a libtard with his fingers in his ears again. > > Regardless, a lying trainwreck like Trump is more entertaining than > Clinton. LOL!!! Not likely. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 09:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npmstu$2hp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366470 |
On 2016-08-24 9:51 AM, DFS wrote: > On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >> This election is going to be a Trump landslide. > > > You're delusional. Considering how often the media lies, there is no reason to believe that their polls are authentic. I would not be surprised to discover that Trump's support is closer to 60% rather than the 32% to 43% that they are giving him at the moment. You can't possibly to blind to all of the pro-Hillary and anti-Trump media treatment and especially can't believe that what you are hearing is truthful. In fact, you can't possibly discount the fact that Trump's rallies are overwhelmed with people trying to get in whereas Hillary's can't even fill up a room. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 12:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npi30l$a7o$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366306 |
On 08/22/16 14:51, Snit wrote: > On 8/22/16, 1:47 PM, in article fhjviuad83.a0@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/22/16, 1:04 PM, in article hjgsuaf93.nbmcju@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Another day, another 15,000 Hillary emails discovered. >>>> >>> I have (no surprise) a rather lengthy write-up on my view of Comey's >>> testimony. The short version: I see no reason to think he is anything other >>> than a decent and moral person. While he did not recommend indictment DID >>> show Clinton is not in any way a good candidate for president. >>> >>> And that is just the tip of the iceberg for her. The DNC has been absurd in >>> selecting her. She is Trump's best chance to get to the White House. >> >> But you will vote for her anyway, or at least take an action that favors >> her victory, such as abstaining, or voting for someone with no chance of >> winning, right? > > How does NOT voting for her in any way favor her victory? I hear the same > thing from her supporters saying if I do not vote for her I am favoring > Trump. > > Not voting for either is not favoring either. Trump is a horror show, but > even he is not so bad as to lead to me supporting the election fraud that > has gotten Clinton to where she is. > Trump isn't a horror show. He gives great promise of putting back the balance to government, where it started with the Chimp, in scoffing the law and doing whatever he wants to anyway. Even Obama said he can do anything he wanted to do now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 11:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E1E065.79E19%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366374 |
On 8/23/16, 11:00 AM, in article npi30l$a7o$5@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > On 08/22/16 14:51, Snit wrote: >> On 8/22/16, 1:47 PM, in article fhjviuad83.a0@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/22/16, 1:04 PM, in article hjgsuaf93.nbmcju@perch.invalid, "Octavian >>>> W. >>>> Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Another day, another 15,000 Hillary emails discovered. >>>>> >>>> I have (no surprise) a rather lengthy write-up on my view of Comey's >>>> testimony. The short version: I see no reason to think he is anything other >>>> than a decent and moral person. While he did not recommend indictment DID >>>> show Clinton is not in any way a good candidate for president. >>>> >>>> And that is just the tip of the iceberg for her. The DNC has been absurd in >>>> selecting her. She is Trump's best chance to get to the White House. >>> >>> But you will vote for her anyway, or at least take an action that favors >>> her victory, such as abstaining, or voting for someone with no chance of >>> winning, right? >> >> How does NOT voting for her in any way favor her victory? I hear the same >> thing from her supporters saying if I do not vote for her I am favoring >> Trump. >> >> Not voting for either is not favoring either. Trump is a horror show, but >> even he is not so bad as to lead to me supporting the election fraud that >> has gotten Clinton to where she is. > > Trump isn't a horror show. He has no plans and no qualifications, and has not been successful in his businesses. He *is* a good troll, able to play the media. But what else does he have? His ever changing yet always unrealistic wall? That is a non-starter. His xenophobic fear mongering which will split the country and lead to wars? Not a fan. Really... what does he offer? > He gives great promise of putting back the balance to government, where it > started with the Chimp, in scoffing the law and doing whatever he wants to > anyway. I truly have no idea what you are even talking about? Bedtime for Bonzo? Undoing what Reagan did? Balance with??? > Even Obama said he can do anything he wanted to do now. Obama is very much against Trump. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 15:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npigt3$tkm$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366379 |
On 08/23/16 12:13, Snit wrote: > On 8/23/16, 11:00 AM, in article npi30l$a7o$5@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> On 08/22/16 14:51, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/22/16, 1:47 PM, in article fhjviuad83.a0@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/22/16, 1:04 PM, in article hjgsuaf93.nbmcju@perch.invalid, "Octavian >>>>> W. >>>>> Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Another day, another 15,000 Hillary emails discovered. >>>>>> >>>>> I have (no surprise) a rather lengthy write-up on my view of Comey's >>>>> testimony. The short version: I see no reason to think he is anything other >>>>> than a decent and moral person. While he did not recommend indictment DID >>>>> show Clinton is not in any way a good candidate for president. >>>>> >>>>> And that is just the tip of the iceberg for her. The DNC has been absurd in >>>>> selecting her. She is Trump's best chance to get to the White House. >>>> >>>> But you will vote for her anyway, or at least take an action that favors >>>> her victory, such as abstaining, or voting for someone with no chance of >>>> winning, right? >>> >>> How does NOT voting for her in any way favor her victory? I hear the same >>> thing from her supporters saying if I do not vote for her I am favoring >>> Trump. >>> >>> Not voting for either is not favoring either. Trump is a horror show, but >>> even he is not so bad as to lead to me supporting the election fraud that >>> has gotten Clinton to where she is. >> >> Trump isn't a horror show. > > He has no plans and no qualifications, and has not been successful in his > businesses. He *is* a good troll, able to play the media. But what else does > he have? Who says that Trump has no qualifications? He has one... he's a mason. And the masons are the ones that created the U.S. Constitution. He has plenty of help across the country. Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad word about hillary. > > His ever changing yet always unrealistic wall? That is a non-starter. His > xenophobic fear mongering which will split the country and lead to wars? Not > a fan. Really... what does he offer? > Peace and back to the real law of the land... not sharia law that hillary is promoting. >> He gives great promise of putting back the balance to government, where it >> started with the Chimp, in scoffing the law and doing whatever he wants to >> anyway. > > I truly have no idea what you are even talking about? Bedtime for Bonzo? > Undoing what Reagan did? Balance with??? You know, George Bush, aka the chimp. > >> Even Obama said he can do anything he wanted to do now. > > Obama is very much against Trump. > > I don't doubt it, but Obama is a very weak president. He plays way too much golf while rome is burning.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 15:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E21959.79E71%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366402 |
On 8/23/16, 2:57 PM, in article npigt3$tkm$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: ... >>> Trump isn't a horror show. >> >> He has no plans and no qualifications, and has not been successful in his >> businesses. He *is* a good troll, able to play the media. But what else does >> he have? > > Who says that Trump has no qualifications? He has one... he's a mason. How is that a qualification? > And the masons are the ones that created the U.S. Constitution. He has > plenty of help across the country. > Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad > word about hillary. He is in an organization. That is not a qualification. >> His ever changing yet always unrealistic wall? That is a non-starter. His >> xenophobic fear mongering which will split the country and lead to wars? Not >> a fan. Really... what does he offer? > > Peace and back to the real law of the land... not sharia law that > hillary is promoting. She is not promoting that. Nor is she pushing fear mongering bigotry as much as he does. >>> He gives great promise of putting back the balance to government, where it >>> started with the Chimp, in scoffing the law and doing whatever he wants to >>> anyway. >> >> I truly have no idea what you are even talking about? Bedtime for Bonzo? >> Undoing what Reagan did? Balance with??? > > You know, George Bush, aka the chimp. I think Trump is in the same IQ / capability range... though more charismatic and a better troll. >>> Even Obama said he can do anything he wanted to do now. >> >> Obama is very much against Trump. > > I don't doubt it, but Obama is a very weak president. He plays way too > much golf while rome is burning. He is far too moderate and not willing to stand up to corporations. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 22:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjfdu03.a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366410 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 2:57 PM, in article npigt3$tkm$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > > ... >>>> Trump isn't a horror show. >>> >>> He has no plans and no qualifications, and has not been successful in his >>> businesses. He *is* a good troll, able to play the media. But what else does >>> he have? >> >> Who says that Trump has no qualifications? He has one... he's a mason. > > How is that a qualification? > The Constitution says 35 yrs old, natural born citizen, living here at least 14 yrs. That it for the requisite qualifications. >> And the masons are the ones that created the U.S. Constitution. He has >> plenty of help across the country. >> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad >> word about hillary. > > He is in an organization. That is not a qualification. > The Founders were all Masons. >>> His ever changing yet always unrealistic wall? That is a non-starter. His >>> xenophobic fear mongering which will split the country and lead to wars? Not >>> a fan. Really... what does he offer? >> >> Peace and back to the real law of the land... not sharia law that >> hillary is promoting. > > She is not promoting that. Nor is she pushing fear mongering bigotry as much > as he does. > She is pushing anti-Russia fear mongering. Russia is not our enemy. The Dems want to make them the enemy and would rather cozy up with the true enemy. >>>> He gives great promise of putting back the balance to government, where it >>>> started with the Chimp, in scoffing the law and doing whatever he wants to >>>> anyway. >>> >>> I truly have no idea what you are even talking about? Bedtime for Bonzo? >>> Undoing what Reagan did? Balance with??? >> >> You know, George Bush, aka the chimp. > > I think Trump is in the same IQ / capability range... though more > charismatic and a better troll. > As an former Mensan, I don't give a shit about either their IQs. I don't expect a Nobel Prize out of the president.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web