Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #365819 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-17 14:02 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-08-18 18:56 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 217 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 14:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 21:32 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 14:39 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 21:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:01 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:45 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:58 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:59 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 00:16 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 17:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 00:55 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 18:14 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 01:41 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 19:13 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 22:17 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-17 17:24 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 00:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 03:24 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 15:19 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 09:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:34 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 09:39 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:45 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 09:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:59 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:03 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 17:14 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:26 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 17:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:52 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:25 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:32 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:40 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 13:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:27 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:21 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 14:41 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:54 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 15:28 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:06 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 16:19 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:28 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 16:48 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:56 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 17:09 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 00:19 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 18:01 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 01:34 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 18:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 18:56 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 19:24 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 14:30 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:38 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 14:39 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 19:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 14:26 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:46 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 15:57 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:08 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 19:22 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:31 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 19:21 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 03:31 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-20 19:50 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 04:29 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 06:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 10:53 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 09:20 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 16:50 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 16:36 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 14:57 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 19:57 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 13:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 20:25 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 13:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 20:57 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 14:09 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 21:22 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 14:33 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 18:35 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 22:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 14:31 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 14:42 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 23:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 23:40 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 17:18 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 00:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 18:11 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 23:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 17:19 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 00:44 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 18:41 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:12 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 09:37 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:08 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 11:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 18:48 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 12:07 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 19:30 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 12:56 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:03 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:17 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:37 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:40 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:54 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:03 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:09 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:17 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:46 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:48 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 14:48 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:29 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 17:40 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 01:16 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-23 05:04 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 12:47 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 12:16 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 19:38 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 12:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:01 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:45 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:18 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:29 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:48 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:22 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-25 06:28 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:57 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 04:18 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:36 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 11:50 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:12 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:24 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:20 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:21 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:48 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:16 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:29 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:54 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:39 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 01:03 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:20 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:11 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:46 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 10:52 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:25 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 11:40 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:28 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 17:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 00:51 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 18:12 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:14 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 08:36 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:51 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 08:56 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 16:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 09:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:16 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:23 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:36 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:50 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:53 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:32 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:23 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:52 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 15:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 10:18 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:29 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:31 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:46 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 19:10 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 12:49 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 19:59 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 14:49 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 22:03 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 15:30 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:27 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:45 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 09:46 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 09:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 14:32 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:42 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 18:58 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:45 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 09:21 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:52 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 10:10 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:25 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:08 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 17:50 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-17 14:43 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:06 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 00:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-18 07:12 -0500
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-18 13:43 +0100
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 06:20 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 07:19 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 15:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-19 07:18 -0500
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-19 07:41 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 06:35 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 10:55 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 18:56 -0400
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 23:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <agieo803.a397@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #365991 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/18/16, 2:54 PM, in article adfhjei9.agt@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Didn't you have an anxiety attack at the idea of potentially >> having to go through 700 rooms? > > Hmmm, if this was the real world I might very well... but I do have an > autonomic nervous system disorder that leads to panic attacks. :) > I've known some people with panic attacks. (And when I say "people" I mean "girls").
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 16:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DB90A9.79947%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366002 |
On 8/18/16, 4:06 PM, in article agieo803.a397@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/18/16, 2:54 PM, in article adfhjei9.agt@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Didn't you have an anxiety attack at the idea of potentially >>> having to go through 700 rooms? >> >> Hmmm, if this was the real world I might very well... but I do have an >> autonomic nervous system disorder that leads to panic attacks. :) > > I've known some people with panic attacks. (And when I say "people" > I mean "girls"). Anxiety and panic attacks are recognized more with women, in part because of the stigma many place on men who have anxiety or panic. Sadly bigotry impacts a lot of our society. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 23:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjxcvd.oa983@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366005 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/18/16, 4:06 PM, in article agieo803.a397@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/18/16, 2:54 PM, in article adfhjei9.agt@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Didn't you have an anxiety attack at the idea of potentially >>>> having to go through 700 rooms? >>> >>> Hmmm, if this was the real world I might very well... but I do have an >>> autonomic nervous system disorder that leads to panic attacks. :) >> >> I've known some people with panic attacks. (And when I say "people" >> I mean "girls"). > > Anxiety and panic attacks are recognized more with women, in part because of > the stigma many place on men who have anxiety or panic. Sadly bigotry > impacts a lot of our society. > That smacks of pure PC speculation. What scientific evidence do you have that anxiety takes place equally among the sexes and that data that shows otherwise is tainted by "bigotry"? Large breasts occur more frequently in women. Is it bigotry to recognize this, even though some men, most often bodybuilders, have titties?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 16:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DB9763.79955%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366010 |
On 8/18/16, 4:28 PM, in article fhjxcvd.oa983@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/18/16, 4:06 PM, in article agieo803.a397@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/18/16, 2:54 PM, in article adfhjei9.agt@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Didn't you have an anxiety attack at the idea of potentially >>>>> having to go through 700 rooms? >>>> >>>> Hmmm, if this was the real world I might very well... but I do have an >>>> autonomic nervous system disorder that leads to panic attacks. :) >>> >>> I've known some people with panic attacks. (And when I say "people" >>> I mean "girls"). >> >> Anxiety and panic attacks are recognized more with women, in part because of >> the stigma many place on men who have anxiety or panic. Sadly bigotry >> impacts a lot of our society. > > That smacks of pure PC speculation. What scientific evidence do you > have that anxiety takes place equally among the sexes and that data > that shows otherwise is tainted by "bigotry"? Have done reading on it. The current number of diagnoses is still higher for women (maybe 1.5 to 1?) but the numbers are getting closer. And that is with a pretty obvious bias - which suggests that the actual levels are likely pretty close. But who knows. > Large breasts occur more frequently in women. Is it bigotry to > recognize this, even though some men, most often bodybuilders, > have titties? How is this even relevant? Are you suggesting women do not generally have larger breasts and that it is mere bigotry to think they do? Does not even make sense. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 23:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjfdue92g8.gg@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366012 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/18/16, 4:28 PM, in article fhjxcvd.oa983@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/18/16, 4:06 PM, in article agieo803.a397@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/18/16, 2:54 PM, in article adfhjei9.agt@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Didn't you have an anxiety attack at the idea of potentially >>>>>> having to go through 700 rooms? >>>>> >>>>> Hmmm, if this was the real world I might very well... but I do have an >>>>> autonomic nervous system disorder that leads to panic attacks. :) >>>> >>>> I've known some people with panic attacks. (And when I say "people" >>>> I mean "girls"). >>> >>> Anxiety and panic attacks are recognized more with women, in part because of >>> the stigma many place on men who have anxiety or panic. Sadly bigotry >>> impacts a lot of our society. >> >> That smacks of pure PC speculation. What scientific evidence do you >> have that anxiety takes place equally among the sexes and that data >> that shows otherwise is tainted by "bigotry"? > > Have done reading on it. The current number of diagnoses is still higher for > women (maybe 1.5 to 1?) but the numbers are getting closer. And that is with > a pretty obvious bias What bias? > - which suggests that the actual levels are likely > pretty close. But who knows. > >> Large breasts occur more frequently in women. Is it bigotry to >> recognize this, even though some men, most often bodybuilders, >> have titties? > > How is this even relevant? Are you suggesting women do not generally have > larger breasts and that it is mere bigotry to think they do? Does not even > make sense. > You make a completely unfounded proposition that men have an incidence of anxiety equal to that of women, and that any observed discrepancy is the result of bigotry. And I ask if you think that all widely recognized differences between the sexes are also based on bigotry.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 17:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DB9C36.7995F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366014 |
On 8/18/16, 4:56 PM, in article ahjfdue92g8.gg@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/18/16, 4:28 PM, in article fhjxcvd.oa983@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/18/16, 4:06 PM, in article agieo803.a397@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/18/16, 2:54 PM, in article adfhjei9.agt@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Didn't you have an anxiety attack at the idea of potentially >>>>>>> having to go through 700 rooms? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmmm, if this was the real world I might very well... but I do have an >>>>>> autonomic nervous system disorder that leads to panic attacks. :) >>>>> >>>>> I've known some people with panic attacks. (And when I say "people" >>>>> I mean "girls"). >>>> >>>> Anxiety and panic attacks are recognized more with women, in part because >>>> of >>>> the stigma many place on men who have anxiety or panic. Sadly bigotry >>>> impacts a lot of our society. >>> >>> That smacks of pure PC speculation. What scientific evidence do you >>> have that anxiety takes place equally among the sexes and that data >>> that shows otherwise is tainted by "bigotry"? >> >> Have done reading on it. The current number of diagnoses is still higher for >> women (maybe 1.5 to 1?) but the numbers are getting closer. And that is with >> a pretty obvious bias > > What bias? The bias pushing the idea that anxiety / panic is a weakness men should not "show." >> - which suggests that the actual levels are likely >> pretty close. But who knows. >> >>> Large breasts occur more frequently in women. Is it bigotry to >>> recognize this, even though some men, most often bodybuilders, >>> have titties? >> >> How is this even relevant? Are you suggesting women do not generally have >> larger breasts and that it is mere bigotry to think they do? Does not even >> make sense. > > You make a completely unfounded proposition that men have an incidence > of anxiety equal to that of women, Well, I did no research for this post but gave what I believe the diagnosed rates are (and I might be wrong with that) and reasoning for why it is closer. If you disagree that is fine... any reasoning behind your disagreement? If it really interests you I would suggest looking at the actual diagnosis rates and going from there. My rough approximation from what I think I have read is likely off. :) > and that any observed discrepancy is the result of bigotry. And I ask if you > think that all widely recognized differences between the sexes are also based > on bigotry. A discrepancy in breast sizes being related to bigotry? I do not even get what your point is. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 00:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjgu903a.3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366019 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/18/16, 4:56 PM, in article ahjfdue92g8.gg@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/18/16, 4:28 PM, in article fhjxcvd.oa983@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/18/16, 4:06 PM, in article agieo803.a397@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/18/16, 2:54 PM, in article adfhjei9.agt@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Didn't you have an anxiety attack at the idea of potentially >>>>>>>> having to go through 700 rooms? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hmmm, if this was the real world I might very well... but I do have an >>>>>>> autonomic nervous system disorder that leads to panic attacks. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> I've known some people with panic attacks. (And when I say "people" >>>>>> I mean "girls"). >>>>> >>>>> Anxiety and panic attacks are recognized more with women, in part because >>>>> of >>>>> the stigma many place on men who have anxiety or panic. Sadly bigotry >>>>> impacts a lot of our society. >>>> >>>> That smacks of pure PC speculation. What scientific evidence do you >>>> have that anxiety takes place equally among the sexes and that data >>>> that shows otherwise is tainted by "bigotry"? >>> >>> Have done reading on it. The current number of diagnoses is still higher for >>> women (maybe 1.5 to 1?) but the numbers are getting closer. And that is with >>> a pretty obvious bias >> >> What bias? > > The bias pushing the idea that anxiety / panic is a weakness men should not > "show." > You misinterpret "not having it" with "not showing it." >>> - which suggests that the actual levels are likely >>> pretty close. But who knows. >>> >>>> Large breasts occur more frequently in women. Is it bigotry to >>>> recognize this, even though some men, most often bodybuilders, >>>> have titties? >>> >>> How is this even relevant? Are you suggesting women do not generally have >>> larger breasts and that it is mere bigotry to think they do? Does not even >>> make sense. >> >> You make a completely unfounded proposition that men have an incidence >> of anxiety equal to that of women, > > Well, I did no research for this post but gave what I believe the diagnosed > rates are (and I might be wrong with that) and reasoning for why it is > closer. > PC-biased reasoning based on zero research. OK. > If you disagree that is fine... any reasoning behind your disagreement? If > it really interests you I would suggest looking at the actual diagnosis > rates and going from there. My rough approximation from what I think I have > read is likely off. :) > >> and that any observed discrepancy is the result of bigotry. And I ask if you >> think that all widely recognized differences between the sexes are also based >> on bigotry. > > A discrepancy in breast sizes being related to bigotry? I do not even get > what your point is. > You don't "get" much of what you read. That's because you also have Assburgers which limits your ability to work with abstract concepts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 18:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DBA863.7996A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366022 |
On 8/18/16, 5:19 PM, in article fhjgu903a.3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> You make a completely unfounded proposition that men have an incidence >>> of anxiety equal to that of women, >> >> Well, I did no research for this post but gave what I believe the diagnosed >> rates are (and I might be wrong with that) and reasoning for why it is >> closer. > > PC-biased reasoning based on zero research. OK. Unsupported claim on your part. OK. >> If you disagree that is fine... any reasoning behind your disagreement? If it >> really interests you I would suggest looking at the actual diagnosis rates >> and going from there. My rough approximation from what I think I have read is >> likely off. :) >> >>> and that any observed discrepancy is the result of bigotry. And I ask if >>> you think that all widely recognized differences between the sexes are also >>> based on bigotry. >>> >> A discrepancy in breast sizes being related to bigotry? I do not even get >> what your point is. >> > You don't "get" much of what you read. By all means explain why you would equate thinking women having larger breasts than men is in any way a sign of "bigotry." Face it... that does not even make sense. Your claim was nonsense. > That's because you also have > Assburgers which limits your ability to work with abstract concepts. And here you are mocking people with autism... which, yes, is bigoted. But let us get back to your view on anxiety and panic and the sexes: 1) Do you think the rates are very much different? If so, how different? 2) If it is mostly one sex and not much the other do you think that speaks poorly of those who have it in the less common sex? If so, why? I bet you have no answer. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 01:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbmvndjut83.8@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366025 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/18/16, 5:19 PM, in article fhjgu903a.3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>>> You make a completely unfounded proposition that men have an incidence >>>> of anxiety equal to that of women, >>> >>> Well, I did no research for this post but gave what I believe the diagnosed >>> rates are (and I might be wrong with that) and reasoning for why it is >>> closer. >> >> PC-biased reasoning based on zero research. OK. > > Unsupported claim on your part. OK. > >>> If you disagree that is fine... any reasoning behind your disagreement? If it >>> really interests you I would suggest looking at the actual diagnosis rates >>> and going from there. My rough approximation from what I think I have read is >>> likely off. :) >>> >>>> and that any observed discrepancy is the result of bigotry. And I ask if >>>> you think that all widely recognized differences between the sexes are also >>>> based on bigotry. >>>> >>> A discrepancy in breast sizes being related to bigotry? I do not even get >>> what your point is. >>> >> You don't "get" much of what you read. > > By all means explain why you would equate thinking women having larger > breasts than men is in any way a sign of "bigotry." Face it... that does not > even make sense. Your claim was nonsense. > It's very simple: as an Assburger, you are dense by definition, so my trying to explain the written word to you would be futile; therefore I'll pass. That means of course that you will have to suffer in confusion, fretting over this for hours -- and possibly breaking out in a cold sweat from the effort -- but, well, that's not my problem. And you do have the bear, so you'll be ok in the end.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 18:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DBB4DB.79974%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366027 |
On 8/18/16, 6:34 PM, in article nbmvndjut83.8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/18/16, 5:19 PM, in article fhjgu903a.3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>> You make a completely unfounded proposition that men have an incidence >>>>> of anxiety equal to that of women, >>>> >>>> Well, I did no research for this post but gave what I believe the diagnosed >>>> rates are (and I might be wrong with that) and reasoning for why it is >>>> closer. >>> >>> PC-biased reasoning based on zero research. OK. >> >> Unsupported claim on your part. OK. >> >>>> If you disagree that is fine... any reasoning behind your disagreement? If >>>> it >>>> really interests you I would suggest looking at the actual diagnosis rates >>>> and going from there. My rough approximation from what I think I have read >>>> is >>>> likely off. :) >>>> >>>>> and that any observed discrepancy is the result of bigotry. And I ask if >>>>> you think that all widely recognized differences between the sexes are >>>>> also >>>>> based on bigotry. >>>>> >>>> A discrepancy in breast sizes being related to bigotry? I do not even get >>>> what your point is. >>>> >>> You don't "get" much of what you read. >> >> By all means explain why you would equate thinking women having larger >> breasts than men is in any way a sign of "bigotry." Face it... that does not >> even make sense. Your claim was nonsense. > > It's very simple: as an Assburger, you are dense by definition, so my > trying to explain the written word to you would be futile; therefore > I'll pass. That means of course that you will have to suffer in > confusion, fretting over this for hours -- and possibly breaking out > in a cold sweat from the effort -- but, well, that's not my problem. > And you do have the bear, so you'll be ok in the end. Ah, you realized your claim of breast size being somehow sexist was nonsense so you lashed out to try to feel better about yourself. Well, at least you only snipped and ran when it was pointed out how your room-with-a-prize thought experiment was a great example of why people tend to stay away from desktop Linux. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 18:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gamdncBLWJn_-ivKnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #366027 |
On 2016-08-19, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: // snip > It's very simple: as an Assburger, you are dense by definition, so my > trying to explain the written word to you would be futile; therefore > I'll pass. That means of course that you will have to suffer in > confusion, fretting over this for hours -- and possibly breaking out > in a cold sweat from the effort -- but, well, that's not my problem. > And you do have the bear, so you'll be ok in the end. +1 -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 19:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DBBBF6.7997C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366031 |
On 8/18/16, 6:56 PM, in article gamdncBLWJn_-ivKnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2016-08-19, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > // snip > >> It's very simple: as an Assburger, you are dense by definition, so my >> trying to explain the written word to you would be futile; therefore >> I'll pass. That means of course that you will have to suffer in >> confusion, fretting over this for hours -- and possibly breaking out >> in a cold sweat from the effort -- but, well, that's not my problem. >> And you do have the bear, so you'll be ok in the end. > > +1 You guys cannot help but prove me right time and time again. Owl made the absolutely absurd claim about breast size somehow being bigoted (or, specifically, merely thinking women tend to have larger breasts). It was an absurd claim on his part... meant as an analogy but such a flawed one as to not matter. When I called him on it he went to mocking people with autism... which is, in itself, a nasty thing to do. He then blamed me for not understanding his nonsense (I did... his claims were nonsense) and then Marek came in to back him and work to fit in. The COLA "advocates" care far, far more about being a part of their herd than about being decent people or about being honest. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 14:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <np4us5$opv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365925 |
On 8/18/2016 12:59 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > The diamonds are already cut by masters. And none of them are cursed. What's the max distance between any two rooms? What's the avg distance between any two rooms? How are the rooms arranged? Across how many floors are the rooms spread? Does each room have a door? Is it locked, requiring a key? Doorknob key or card-key?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 18:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjagdieo93.3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #365946 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/18/2016 12:59 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >> The diamonds are already cut by masters. And none of them are cursed. > > > What's the max distance between any two rooms? > > What's the avg distance between any two rooms? > > How are the rooms arranged? > > Across how many floors are the rooms spread? > > Does each room have a door? Is it locked, requiring a key? Doorknob > key or card-key? > I've never been there. Just rented the place for this test. http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02479/VersaillePalace_2479923k.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 14:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <np4ve9$qo4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365950 |
On 8/18/2016 2:38 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/18/2016 12:59 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> >>> The diamonds are already cut by masters. And none of them are cursed. >> >> >> What's the max distance between any two rooms? >> >> What's the avg distance between any two rooms? >> >> How are the rooms arranged? >> >> Across how many floors are the rooms spread? >> >> Does each room have a door? Is it locked, requiring a key? Doorknob >> key or card-key? >> > > I've never been there. Just rented the place for this test. > http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02479/VersaillePalace_2479923k.jpg How did you decide in which room to put the diamonds?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 19:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fajgue03.a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #365952 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/18/2016 2:38 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 8/18/2016 12:59 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The diamonds are already cut by masters. And none of them are cursed. >>> >>> >>> What's the max distance between any two rooms? >>> >>> What's the avg distance between any two rooms? >>> >>> How are the rooms arranged? >>> >>> Across how many floors are the rooms spread? >>> >>> Does each room have a door? Is it locked, requiring a key? Doorknob >>> key or card-key? >>> >> >> I've never been there. Just rented the place for this test. >> http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02479/VersaillePalace_2479923k.jpg > > > How did you decide in which room to put the diamonds? > The statue is pointing to the room.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 14:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <02c34083-a2b2-4acd-b70c-dcc3f7373b8e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #365950 |
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 2:38:06 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > > > > What's...? What's...? How...? Does...? > > I've never been there. Just rented the place for this test. > http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02479/VersaillePalace_2479923k.jpg Been there twice. Pretty interesting place, although the compound is pretty damn big, so you can blow a lot of time just getting around. For example, from the RER Chantiers to where that not-your's photo was taken is a quick mile one way. And if you were to turn around to face the other way from that same photo location, you'd look down some steps to the Latone fountain: <http://photo-hh.com/Europe/Pages/Paris-05.html#46> Now go down the steps, walk past the Latone, down the hill to the Apollo fountain (~1/2 mi), then walk another 1/2 mile along the Grand Canal until you reach the crosspiece (its visible in the photo if you know where to look) and turn right. In a 1/4 mile you'll reach Le Grand Trianon, and +1/4 mile beyond Grand is Le Petit Trianon, which was part of the private residence of Marie-Antoinette. Its a bit further still to the billiard room at Maison de la Reine, but you've already walked 2.5 miles so far from Chantiers and the return includes a decent uphill right after the Apollo. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 21:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adfhjek983qr.k@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #365982 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 2:38:06 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> > >> > What's...? What's...? How...? Does...? >> >> I've never been there. Just rented the place for this test. >> http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02479/VersaillePalace_2479923k.jpg > > Been there twice. > > Pretty interesting place, although the compound is pretty damn > big, so you can blow a lot of time just getting around. For > example, from the RER Chantiers to where that not-your's photo > was taken is a quick mile one way. And if you were to turn > around to face the other way from that same photo location, > you'd look down some steps to the Latone fountain: > > <http://photo-hh.com/Europe/Pages/Paris-05.html#46> > > Now go down the steps, walk past the Latone, down the hill > to the Apollo fountain (~1/2 mi), then walk another 1/2 mile > along the Grand Canal until you reach the crosspiece (its > visible in the photo if you know where to look) and turn right. > In a 1/4 mile you'll reach Le Grand Trianon, and +1/4 mile > beyond Grand is Le Petit Trianon, which was part of the > private residence of Marie-Antoinette. Its a bit further still > to the billiard room at Maison de la Reine, but you've already > walked 2.5 miles so far from Chantiers and the return includes > a decent uphill right after the Apollo. > > Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks from the Moslem hoardes. Marie's place is just a skeleton of its former self. http://ow.ly/W1Cd303n6Zv
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bd18766f-eed2-4f0b-9c36-77749b07ff18@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #365987 |
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 5:46:45 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > -hh wrote: > > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > What's...? What's...? How...? Does...? > >> > >> I've never been there. Just rented the place for this test. > >> http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02479/VersaillePalace_2479923k.jpg > > > > Been there twice. > > > > Pretty interesting place, although the compound is pretty damn > > big, so you can blow a lot of time just getting around. For > > example, from the RER Chantiers to where that not-your's photo > > was taken is a quick mile one way. And if you were to turn > > around to face the other way from that same photo location, > > you'd look down some steps to the Latone fountain: > > > > <http://photo-hh.com/Europe/Pages/Paris-05.html#46> > > > > Now go down the steps, walk past the Latone, down the hill > > to the Apollo fountain (~1/2 mi), then walk another 1/2 mile > > along the Grand Canal until you reach the crosspiece (its > > visible in the photo if you know where to look) and turn right. > > In a 1/4 mile you'll reach Le Grand Trianon, and +1/4 mile > > beyond Grand is Le Petit Trianon, which was part of the > > private residence of Marie-Antoinette. Its a bit further still > > to the billiard room at Maison de la Reine, but you've already > > walked 2.5 miles so far from Chantiers and the return includes > > a decent uphill right after the Apollo. > > Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks > from the Moslem hoardes. Actually, the good news is that since they charge an admission, one doesn't have any COLA Freetards running around. Which also explains why you've never been there! ;-P -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 23:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <afbej939a.o@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #365997 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 5:46:45 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> -hh wrote: >> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > What's...? What's...? How...? Does...? >> >> >> >> I've never been there. Just rented the place for this test. >> >> http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02479/VersaillePalace_2479923k.jpg >> > >> > Been there twice. >> > >> > Pretty interesting place, although the compound is pretty damn >> > big, so you can blow a lot of time just getting around. For >> > example, from the RER Chantiers to where that not-your's photo >> > was taken is a quick mile one way. And if you were to turn >> > around to face the other way from that same photo location, >> > you'd look down some steps to the Latone fountain: >> > >> > <http://photo-hh.com/Europe/Pages/Paris-05.html#46> >> > >> > Now go down the steps, walk past the Latone, down the hill >> > to the Apollo fountain (~1/2 mi), then walk another 1/2 mile >> > along the Grand Canal until you reach the crosspiece (its >> > visible in the photo if you know where to look) and turn right. >> > In a 1/4 mile you'll reach Le Grand Trianon, and +1/4 mile >> > beyond Grand is Le Petit Trianon, which was part of the >> > private residence of Marie-Antoinette. Its a bit further still >> > to the billiard room at Maison de la Reine, but you've already >> > walked 2.5 miles so far from Chantiers and the return includes >> > a decent uphill right after the Apollo. >> >> Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks >> from the Moslem hoardes. > > Actually, the good news is that since they charge an admission, > one doesn't have any COLA Freetards running around. > > Which also explains why you've never been there! ;-P > Have you been back since the Conquest began?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web