Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #318523 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-02 03:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-09-01 18:46 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 116 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-02 03:00 +0200
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 01:35 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 09:11 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 14:52 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-02 16:53 +0200
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 11:43 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 17:53 +0200
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:59 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-02 18:07 +0200
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 13:10 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:16 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 13:20 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:24 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 19:17 +0200
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-02 11:21 -0500
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:36 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:56 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-02 18:05 +0200
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-02 20:46 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 09:08 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-03 15:53 +0200
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-03 09:08 -0500
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-03 10:24 -0400
DumFSck's idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-03 09:40 -0500
Re: DumFSck's idiocy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:02 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-03 12:28 -0600
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-04 00:24 +0200
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 13:09 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:22 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 17:45 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-03 10:03 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 09:17 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-03 13:35 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 10:42 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-03 15:25 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 12:55 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-03 09:31 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:42 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-03 09:26 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 10:39 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:04 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 12:52 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 17:00 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 20:56 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-04 08:53 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 10:20 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 07:39 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 10:49 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:55 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 12:58 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 10:11 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 12:57 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 10:03 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 15:44 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 19:50 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 12:58 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:11 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 13:17 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:27 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Hoppy Hopkins <hopster86u4me@surferb.net> - 2015-09-04 18:28 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:21 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:33 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:46 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 14:49 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:34 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:37 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-04 20:18 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 17:40 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 21:18 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 09:53 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-05 11:11 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-05 10:21 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 08:09 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-05 11:42 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 08:46 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-05 11:54 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 16:05 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share hifye <hifye@humanoid.net> - 2015-09-05 11:58 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-05 11:10 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 16:02 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 14:20 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 16:00 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-05 13:51 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 14:12 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:11 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:20 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 13:24 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:30 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:36 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:28 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:38 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:49 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 14:00 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 12:56 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 16:29 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:35 +0000
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 18:24 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 18:42 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 18:43 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 21:17 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 21:50 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 09:51 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-05 10:12 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 11:24 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 16:09 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 21:57 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 14:28 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 05:16 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-09-10 11:38 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-10 12:02 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 09:16 -0700
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-10 14:53 -0400
Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 18:46 -0700
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 15:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ms9jde$b0m$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #318728 |
On 9/3/15 2:46 AM, DFS wrote: > On 9/2/2015 12:05 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC) >> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> >>> America is number 1. >>> >> >> America long live and prosper! ;) > > > "live long and prosper" > > Hope you mean that. > > We will. > > > > Yeah ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 09:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <i0lguaphdr2vt419cgi24dl3hj3sqphd4d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #318787 |
Melzzzzz wrote: >Yeah ;) A "smiley" for that dumb fscking creep? -- 'You (the lame Linux "community") have always decided on one "best distro".' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 10:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms9l3r$nhu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318791 |
On 9/3/2015 10:08 AM, shitv wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote: > >> >Yeah;) > A "smiley" for that dumb fscking creep? Notice no one ever - EVER - give you smileys, turd? > -- 'You (the lame Linux "community") have always decided on one "best > distro".' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly shitv supporting my "lie": "the top distros have barely changed in YEARS." heh! What a fucking moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 09:40 -0500 |
| Subject | DumFSck's idiocy |
| Message-ID | <g6mgua5gbekf7l00fjjmaj4k4bbna3imjq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #318791 |
>-- >'You (the lame Linux "community") have always decided on one "best >distro".' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly Someone should ask the dumb fsck if the beer-drinking community has decided that Bud is the "best beer", and if the car-driving community has decided that the Toyota Camry is the "best car". This is the kind of bald-faced, embarrassingly-wrong idiocy and lies that DumFSck regularly displays. The advocates are ridiculous, DumFSck claims, because we say that there is no "best distro", but yet the community has always decided on one "best distro". Except the community has done no such thing. Obviously. "Ezekiel" doesn't care. "Ezekiel" supports and defends his shitty pal's idiocy and lies. They seem to march in lock-step, even when they are *obviously* wrong. Like the other day when both of the fsckwitted dumbshits thought that it was just terrible that a GUI design team would include a person that had zero computer experience. These dipshits assume to pass judgement upon us? Ha! -- "Most MS programs are great, great software. Why do you think so many large companies buy it?" - DumFSck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 15:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: DumFSck's idiocy |
| Message-ID | <d4r5p2F71k4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #318797 |
On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 09:40:13 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>-- >>'You (the lame Linux "community") have always decided on one "best >>distro".' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly > > Someone should ask the dumb fsck if the beer-drinking community has > decided that Bud is the "best beer", and if the car-driving community > has decided that the Toyota Camry is the "best car". > > This is the kind of bald-faced, embarrassingly-wrong idiocy and lies > that DumFSck regularly displays. The advocates are ridiculous, DumFSck > claims, because we say that there is no "best distro", but yet the > community has always decided on one "best distro". > > Except the community has done no such thing. Obviously. > Very true. The Linux community has pretty much decided to make Linux on the desktop remain a hobbyist/geek/techie OS. Nothing wrong with that. > "Ezekiel" doesn't care. "Ezekiel" supports and defends his shitty pal's > idiocy and lies. > > They seem to march in lock-step, even when they are *obviously* wrong. > Like the other day when both of the fsckwitted dumbshits thought that it > was just terrible that a GUI design team would include a person that had > zero computer experience. > > These dipshits assume to pass judgement upon us? Ha! Meanwhile back at the COLA ranch, the Linux loonies pass judgement on everyone else with responses and snippage to/from posts they claim to have killfiled. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 12:28 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <PYOdnWEBXfj_DHXInZ2dnUU7-eGdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #318791 |
On 09/03/15 08:08, chrisv wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote: > >> Yeah ;) > > A "smiley" for that dumb fscking creep? > Smile if you've tasted a dick sweeter than mine? :-) -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 00:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20150904002445.07033cfb@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #318791 |
On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 09:08:59 -0500 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote: > > >Yeah ;) > > A "smiley" for that dumb fscking creep? > I don't want to think of that ;) I cannot figure out difference between "long live" and "live long" ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 13:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms7adi$oum$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318630 |
On 2015-09-02 11:56 AM, owl wrote: > A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went >>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS >>>>>> share. >>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>> >>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>> >>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>> >>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>> >>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! > >> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >> represented by the number 1. > > Actually it is. America is number 1. In what? Education and freedom indexes both put the country very far from first place.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 17:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fasmnv83.ajdi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318646 |
A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-09-02 11:56 AM, owl wrote: >> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went >>>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS >>>>>>> share. >>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>>> >>>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>>> >>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>>> >>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! >> >>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >>> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >>> represented by the number 1. >> >> Actually it is. America is number 1. > In what? Education and freedom indexes both put the country very far > from first place. Hi Snit. Got some "studies" to back up your claims?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 17:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms7qij$qq5$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318652 |
On 2015-09-02 1:22 PM, owl wrote: > A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> On 2015-09-02 11:56 AM, owl wrote: >>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went >>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS >>>>>>>> share. >>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>>>> >>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>>>> >>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! >>> >>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >>>> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >>>> represented by the number 1. >>> >>> Actually it is. America is number 1. > >> In what? Education and freedom indexes both put the country very far >> from first place. > > Hi Snit. Got some "studies" to back up your claims? For freedom: <http://minutemennews.com/2015/08/united-states-falls-to-20th-place-in-human-freedom-index/> For education: <http://www.ibtimes.com/us-17th-global-education-ranking-finland-south-korea-claim-top-spots-901538> I hate to break it to you, but the United States suck.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 10:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fadfnm0.3fa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318694 |
A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-09-02 1:22 PM, owl wrote: >> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-02 11:56 AM, owl wrote: >>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went >>>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS >>>>>>>>> share. >>>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! >>>> >>>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >>>>> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >>>>> represented by the number 1. >>>> >>>> Actually it is. America is number 1. >> >>> In what? Education and freedom indexes both put the country very far >>> from first place. >> >> Hi Snit. Got some "studies" to back up your claims? > For freedom: > <http://minutemennews.com/2015/08/united-states-falls-to-20th-place-in-human-freedom-index/> So countries where you are not free to purchase or carry a handgun, or where you can go to jail for speaking an opinion, are considered more "free" than the United States. OK. > For education: > <http://www.ibtimes.com/us-17th-global-education-ranking-finland-south-korea-claim-top-spots-901538> No doubt the education system is for shit. Look at who they hire as teachers. I read the other day about some professor at WSU who would fail his students if they used the phrase "illegal aliens" -- this is the same guy who called one of his studens a "white shithead" or somesuch. > I hate to break it to you, but the United States suck. I hate to break it to you, but Canada sucks worse.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 09:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms9h5u$7bp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318758 |
On 2015-09-03 6:03 AM, owl wrote: > A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> On 2015-09-02 1:22 PM, owl wrote: >>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-02 11:56 AM, owl wrote: >>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went >>>>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS >>>>>>>>>> share. >>>>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! >>>>> >>>>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >>>>>> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >>>>>> represented by the number 1. >>>>> >>>>> Actually it is. America is number 1. >>> >>>> In what? Education and freedom indexes both put the country very far >>>> from first place. >>> >>> Hi Snit. Got some "studies" to back up your claims? > >> For freedom: >> <http://minutemennews.com/2015/08/united-states-falls-to-20th-place-in-human-freedom-index/> > > > So countries where you are not free to purchase or carry a handgun, or > where you can go to jail for speaking an opinion, are considered more > "free" than the United States. OK. Except that a lot of states in your country do NOT allow you to carry a handgun wherever you go. Think of Illinois for instance, where such a thing has been banned, and where crime has skyrocketed as a result. >> For education: >> <http://www.ibtimes.com/us-17th-global-education-ranking-finland-south-korea-claim-top-spots-901538> > > No doubt the education system is for shit. Look at who they hire as > teachers. I read the other day about some professor at WSU who would > fail his students if they used the phrase "illegal aliens" -- this is > the same guy who called one of his studens a "white shithead" or somesuch. It's political correct rearing its ugly head again. That is one of the things killing your culture at the moment. >> I hate to break it to you, but the United States suck. > > I hate to break it to you, but Canada sucks worse. 2008's economic crisis didn't hit us as hard as it hit you because we had the sense to regulate our banks. Our Conservative prime minister also promised a surplus by this year and he managed a $5 billion one despite the difficulties in the oil sector. We also get to vote for one of four major political parties in our election this year, not two corporate shills, and if the leader of the political party which elects the most representatives doesn't win, that leader is forced out of his position. It's a working democracy, something that is only a distant, ancient memory for you guys. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 13:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsl0.adfj@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318777 |
A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-09-03 6:03 AM, owl wrote: >> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-02 1:22 PM, owl wrote: >>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-09-02 11:56 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went >>>>>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS >>>>>>>>>>> share. >>>>>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! >>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >>>>>>> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >>>>>>> represented by the number 1. >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually it is. America is number 1. >>>> >>>>> In what? Education and freedom indexes both put the country very far >>>>> from first place. >>>> >>>> Hi Snit. Got some "studies" to back up your claims? >> >>> For freedom: >>> <http://minutemennews.com/2015/08/united-states-falls-to-20th-place-in-human-freedom-index/> >> >> >> So countries where you are not free to purchase or carry a handgun, or >> where you can go to jail for speaking an opinion, are considered more >> "free" than the United States. OK. > Except that a lot of states in your country do NOT allow you to carry a > handgun wherever you go. Think of Illinois for instance, where such a > thing has been banned, and where crime has skyrocketed as a result. Some states are fucked up. Illinois is one of them. But even Illinois issues concealed carry permits. They're selling these to somebody: http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/phil-flores-helps-a-customer-shop-for-a-pistol-at-freddie-news-photo/159740256 >>> For education: >>> <http://www.ibtimes.com/us-17th-global-education-ranking-finland-south-korea-claim-top-spots-901538> >> >> No doubt the education system is for shit. Look at who they hire as >> teachers. I read the other day about some professor at WSU who would >> fail his students if they used the phrase "illegal aliens" -- this is >> the same guy who called one of his studens a "white shithead" or somesuch. > It's political correct rearing its ugly head again. That is one of the > things killing your culture at the moment. Trump 2016. >>> I hate to break it to you, but the United States suck. >> >> I hate to break it to you, but Canada sucks worse. > 2008's economic crisis didn't hit us as hard as it hit you because we > had the sense to regulate our banks. Our Conservative prime minister > also promised a surplus by this year and he managed a $5 billion one > despite the difficulties in the oil sector. We also get to vote for one > of four major political parties in our election this year, not two > corporate shills, and if the leader of the political party which elects > the most representatives doesn't win, that leader is forced out of his > position. It's a working democracy, something that is only a distant, > ancient memory for you guys. Where is Canada, anyway?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 10:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms9m4p$qgu$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318786 |
On 2015-09-03 9:35 AM, owl wrote: > A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> On 2015-09-03 6:03 AM, owl wrote: >>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-02 1:22 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-09-02 11:56 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went >>>>>>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS >>>>>>>>>>>> share. >>>>>>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >>>>>>>> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >>>>>>>> represented by the number 1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually it is. America is number 1. >>>>> >>>>>> In what? Education and freedom indexes both put the country very far >>>>>> from first place. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Snit. Got some "studies" to back up your claims? >>> >>>> For freedom: >>>> <http://minutemennews.com/2015/08/united-states-falls-to-20th-place-in-human-freedom-index/> >>> >>> >>> So countries where you are not free to purchase or carry a handgun, or >>> where you can go to jail for speaking an opinion, are considered more >>> "free" than the United States. OK. > >> Except that a lot of states in your country do NOT allow you to carry a >> handgun wherever you go. Think of Illinois for instance, where such a >> thing has been banned, and where crime has skyrocketed as a result. > > Some states are fucked up. Illinois is one of them. But even Illinois > issues concealed carry permits. > > They're selling these to somebody: > http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/phil-flores-helps-a-customer-shop-for-a-pistol-at-freddie-news-photo/159740256 Concealed carry should be allowed everywhere, even in Canada. I would feel a lot more comfortable, as a teacher, knowing that I _could_ defend my students if something happened than rely on the idiotic strategies they've proposed so far in the hope that we don't get shot. >>>> For education: >>>> <http://www.ibtimes.com/us-17th-global-education-ranking-finland-south-korea-claim-top-spots-901538> >>> >>> No doubt the education system is for shit. Look at who they hire as >>> teachers. I read the other day about some professor at WSU who would >>> fail his students if they used the phrase "illegal aliens" -- this is >>> the same guy who called one of his studens a "white shithead" or somesuch. > >> It's political correct rearing its ugly head again. That is one of the >> things killing your culture at the moment. > > Trump 2016. To be honest, I like him too. >>>> I hate to break it to you, but the United States suck. >>> >>> I hate to break it to you, but Canada sucks worse. > >> 2008's economic crisis didn't hit us as hard as it hit you because we >> had the sense to regulate our banks. Our Conservative prime minister >> also promised a surplus by this year and he managed a $5 billion one >> despite the difficulties in the oil sector. We also get to vote for one >> of four major political parties in our election this year, not two >> corporate shills, and if the leader of the political party which elects >> the most representatives doesn't win, that leader is forced out of his >> position. It's a working democracy, something that is only a distant, >> ancient memory for you guys. > > Where is Canada, anyway? Sixth. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 15:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adfv.awf34@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318798 |
A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-09-03 9:35 AM, owl wrote: >> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-03 6:03 AM, owl wrote: >>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-09-02 1:22 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-09-02 11:56 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went >>>>>>>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS >>>>>>>>>>>>> share. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >>>>>>>>> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >>>>>>>>> represented by the number 1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually it is. America is number 1. >>>>>> >>>>>>> In what? Education and freedom indexes both put the country very far >>>>>>> from first place. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Snit. Got some "studies" to back up your claims? >>>> >>>>> For freedom: >>>>> <http://minutemennews.com/2015/08/united-states-falls-to-20th-place-in-human-freedom-index/> >>>> >>>> >>>> So countries where you are not free to purchase or carry a handgun, or >>>> where you can go to jail for speaking an opinion, are considered more >>>> "free" than the United States. OK. >> >>> Except that a lot of states in your country do NOT allow you to carry a >>> handgun wherever you go. Think of Illinois for instance, where such a >>> thing has been banned, and where crime has skyrocketed as a result. >> >> Some states are fucked up. Illinois is one of them. But even Illinois >> issues concealed carry permits. >> >> They're selling these to somebody: >> http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/phil-flores-helps-a-customer-shop-for-a-pistol-at-freddie-news-photo/159740256 > Concealed carry should be allowed everywhere, even in Canada. I would > feel a lot more comfortable, as a teacher, knowing that I _could_ defend > my students if something happened than rely on the idiotic strategies > they've proposed so far in the hope that we don't get shot. I usually take the time to thank people who open carry for making sure that the soccer moms remember what country we live in. >>>>> For education: >>>>> <http://www.ibtimes.com/us-17th-global-education-ranking-finland-south-korea-claim-top-spots-901538> >>>> >>>> No doubt the education system is for shit. Look at who they hire as >>>> teachers. I read the other day about some professor at WSU who would >>>> fail his students if they used the phrase "illegal aliens" -- this is >>>> the same guy who called one of his studens a "white shithead" or somesuch. >> >>> It's political correct rearing its ugly head again. That is one of the >>> things killing your culture at the moment. >> >> Trump 2016. > To be honest, I like him too. The silent majority has had it up to here with this political correctness crap. If they don't try to screw him out of the nomination, it's pretty much a done deal. >>>>> I hate to break it to you, but the United States suck. >>>> >>>> I hate to break it to you, but Canada sucks worse. >> >>> 2008's economic crisis didn't hit us as hard as it hit you because we >>> had the sense to regulate our banks. Our Conservative prime minister >>> also promised a surplus by this year and he managed a $5 billion one >>> despite the difficulties in the oil sector. We also get to vote for one >>> of four major political parties in our election this year, not two >>> corporate shills, and if the leader of the political party which elects >>> the most representatives doesn't win, that leader is forced out of his >>> position. It's a working democracy, something that is only a distant, >>> ancient memory for you guys. >> >> Where is Canada, anyway? > Sixth. No, I mean where is it on the Earth?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 12:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms9tu3$tla$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318805 |
On 2015-09-03 11:25 AM, owl wrote: >> Concealed carry should be allowed everywhere, even in Canada. I would >> feel a lot more comfortable, as a teacher, knowing that I _could_ defend >> my students if something happened than rely on the idiotic strategies >> they've proposed so far in the hope that we don't get shot. > > I usually take the time to thank people who open carry for making sure > that the soccer moms remember what country we live in. I would do. Concealed carry should be a human right. >>> Trump 2016. > >> To be honest, I like him too. > > The silent majority has had it up to here with this political correctness > crap. If they don't try to screw him out of the nomination, it's pretty > much a done deal. We'll see, but we both know very well that they'll screw him out of it and hand it to Bush. Bush is part of their plans and has been since at least 2008, Trump isn't. >>> Where is Canada, anyway? > >> Sixth. > > No, I mean where is it on the Earth? :) I guess you're joking, but if you're not, we're that mass of intellect found north of your borders. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 09:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20DC3E7.59D5D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318786 |
On 9/3/15, 6:35 AM, in article fsl0.adfj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >>> No doubt the education system is for shit. Look at who they hire as >>> teachers. I read the other day about some professor at WSU who would >>> fail his students if they used the phrase "illegal aliens" -- this is >>> the same guy who called one of his studens a "white shithead" or somesuch. > >> It's political correct rearing its ugly head again. That is one of the >> things killing your culture at the moment. > > Trump 2016. The best debate around Trump, I think, is the debate as to if he is: 1) Just what the Republicans need a great thing for their party and someone who speaks his mind and represents them well, OR 2) A Democrat plant from Hillary Clinton spewing racist, sexist, incoherent, anti-science, ever-changing nonsense to destroy the chance of the Republican winning the White House by making them look bad. And people REALLY cannot tell. When your party gets to THAT point I think it is a clear sign you need a new platform. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 16:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d4rbk4F8j96U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #318811 |
On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 09:31:19 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 9/3/15, 6:35 AM, in article fsl0.adfj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>>> No doubt the education system is for shit. Look at who they hire as >>>> teachers. I read the other day about some professor at WSU who would >>>> fail his students if they used the phrase "illegal aliens" -- this is >>>> the same guy who called one of his studens a "white shithead" or >>>> somesuch. >> >>> It's political correct rearing its ugly head again. That is one of the >>> things killing your culture at the moment. >> >> Trump 2016. > > The best debate around Trump, I think, is the debate as to if he is: > > 1) Just what the Republicans need a great thing for their party and > someone who speaks his mind and represents them well, OR > > 2) A Democrat plant from Hillary Clinton spewing racist, sexist, > incoherent, > anti-science, ever-changing nonsense to destroy the chance of the > Republican winning the White House by making them look bad. > > And people REALLY cannot tell. When your party gets to THAT point I > think it is a clear sign you need a new platform. > > ... He's a sideshow! His chances of taking the nomination are very low as they should be. And for those that claim Obama is a narcissist, well Trump has him beat on that by a mile!! :) -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 09:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms9hng$8n9$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318630 |
On 9/2/2015 11:56 AM, owl wrote: > A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went >>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS >>>>>> share. >>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>> >>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>> >>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>> >>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>> >>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! > >> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >> represented by the number 1. > > Actually it is. America is number 1. Yes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 10:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms9m06$qgu$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318782 |
On 2015-09-03 9:26 AM, DFS wrote: > On 9/2/2015 11:56 AM, owl wrote: >> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote: >>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that >>>>>>> went >>>>>>> to others. Now corrected. >>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and >>>>>>> ChromeOS >>>>>>> share. >>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation. >>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Linux 284309 0.30 >>>>>> >>>>>> Linux at 30 percent! Oo-rah! >>>> >>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%. >>>> >>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent. Yes! >> >>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30% >>> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is >>> represented by the number 1. >> >> Actually it is. America is number 1. > > Yes. Your cars are shit (ALL of them, only Buick manages even slightly respectable reliability scores), your education system is shit, your level of freedom is shit, your agricultural system is shit (GMO, pesticides, crops doused in recycled oil water), your citizens are mostly morons (Mark Dice keeps proving this) and your journalistic freedom is shit as well. I'm not sure what you believe makes you guys number 1. -- A.M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web