Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #457114 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-10 19:54 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-07-24 07:28 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 252 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Chris Pratt etc. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 19:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-07-11 09:08 -0400
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-13 09:58 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 16:32 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 09:38 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 10:03 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:06 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:30 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 12:27 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 13:19 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-13 10:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 17:44 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:12 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-13 12:36 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 12:43 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 13:10 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 19:53 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 21:17 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:46 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 12:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 13:12 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 14:28 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:50 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:14 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:21 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 09:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 10:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:03 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:17 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:30 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 12:24 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 13:14 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 14:33 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:53 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 15:00 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:43 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:01 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 10:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:11 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:20 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:24 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:30 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 12:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 12:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 13:19 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 13:19 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 13:42 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-14 21:12 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 15:10 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-14 22:52 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 16:17 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 17:02 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 09:24 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:26 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 10:35 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 11:35 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:29 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 16:30 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:45 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 10:01 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 10:44 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 11:51 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 13:58 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 14:42 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 17:18 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 14:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:21 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 22:56 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:29 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 06:06 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 15:31 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:49 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:16 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 17:38 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-13 12:53 -0500
There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:02 -0700
Re: There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 18:13 +0000
Re: There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 07:13 -0500
Re: There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 16:08 +0000
Re: There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 11:34 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 18:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 07:00 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 08:02 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 06:48 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 14:53 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 10:12 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:19 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:52 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:12 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 08:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:00 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:09 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 10:22 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:35 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 10:42 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 08:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 16:00 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:23 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:18 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:15 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 16:00 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 11:32 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 10:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:59 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 13:09 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:33 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:44 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 13:46 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:51 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:06 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 13:58 -0500
Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:24 +0000
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:42 -0700
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:30 -0500
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:49 +0000
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:52 -0500
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 20:04 +0000
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:07 -0500
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:20 -0700
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:36 -0700
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:39 -0700
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:47 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 19:18 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:05 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:24 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:46 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 17:25 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 11:15 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:29 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:49 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 18:54 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:15 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:02 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:09 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:11 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:49 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:42 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 14:07 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 14:18 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 14:38 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:32 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 15:41 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 15:57 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:34 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:43 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 19:30 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:40 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:46 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 18:32 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:37 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:56 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:18 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 13:44 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:50 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:01 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:55 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:10 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 21:10 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 16:17 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 06:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:54 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 08:38 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:59 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:25 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 10:52 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 18:51 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 14:51 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 18:06 -0400
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 15:26 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 22:19 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 17:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-17 01:03 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 19:23 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:36 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:52 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-17 03:56 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 21:26 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 02:37 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 04:11 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 22:44 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 01:20 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-17 02:50 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 03:08 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 04:59 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-17 13:20 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 06:48 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 17:15 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-17 13:45 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-18 01:38 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 19:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-18 03:06 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:26 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 04:45 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-18 15:24 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:42 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 00:48 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 18:03 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-18 19:29 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 12:49 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-19 06:46 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 14:51 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 08:07 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-19 09:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 09:26 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 17:30 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 10:59 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-19 13:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 13:52 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 20:58 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-19 14:33 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-20 01:22 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 18:33 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 10:10 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 20:07 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 10:56 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-20 10:08 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-20 18:01 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:28 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-20 11:40 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:59 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 14:23 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 19:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 07:04 -0700
Racist Communism Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-07-27 16:51 -0700
We can't change the past or the future. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-07-24 07:28 -0700
Page 9 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 13 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 14:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2df35c96-2490-4d15-bd40-d4c2a923bf38@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457723 |
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 2:18:43 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 2:42:05 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 7/16/18 12:25 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 1:11:24 PM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: > > >> RonB wrote: > > >> > > >>> SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Do you consider it normal for homosexuals to _choose_ to be infected with > > >>>> AIDS and to promote it as an upgrade to their lifestyle? Do you consider > > >>>> it normal for grown men to parade themselves around naked in the middle > > >>>> of the day on a public street to promote their lifestyle to little kids? > > >>> > > >>> Of course the libtards will make excuses for this kind of deviant, perverted > > >>> behavior. > > >> > > >> You speak of liberals being "gullible", when you take the pack of lies > > >> that "Slimer" posted, above at face-value? > > >> > > >> Listen, outside of some tiny number who are truly mentally-ill, > > >> homosexuals do not choose to be infected with AIDS and to promote it > > >> as an upgrade to their lifestyle. > > >> > > >> I mean, you just could not make-up a more ridiculous *lie* than that. > > >> > > >> Neither do they "parade themselves around naked in the middle of the > > >> day on a public street to promote their lifestyle to little kids". We > > >> have a Pride parade in my town, and no such thing occurred. > > >> > > >> No, some freakish exception to the rule does not "prove your case". > > > > > > Nor does ascribing one with such a broad brush prove anything; this > > > is the issue Snit has, he paints everything 'good vs evil', which is BS. > > > > It is BS > > > So stop it already... the world is as simple as good vs. evil. You just > wrote: > > "Curious, what is your solution to poverty and homelessness? > > For me it is, in broad strokes, not that hard... " > > It's so 'not that hard' that everyone should be doing it, right? > Grow a brain already, the world is much more complicated > than your dream.\ > > > >> God Damn, you right-wingers are filthy. > > > > > > Yeah, like that... way too broad a brush. > > > > > > The fall out of identity politics is that certain terms no longer have > > > any valuable meaning: > > > > > > Left > > > Right > > > Liberal > > > Conservative > > > Racist > > > Sexist > > > Feminist > > > > > > ... and several others. > > > > Just because YOU do not get meaning from a term > > LOL! > > Most everyone calling themselves a 'liberal' or a 'conservative' has a > different meaning for them so they have been rendered meaningless > for any useful discussion. Everyone knows this... but it hits the lib > politicians much harder because they're the basis for their existence > so they have no choice but to latch on. > > Grow the necessary clue, when telling people what they want to hear > no longer works it's only results that matter and all the SJW BS goes > out the f*cking window... for awhile, anyway. Now why the task to recode into WebAssembly via direct input in a super computer system? No matter, flatfish didn't list this as part of his, predictably, never ending expansion of 'needs' <shrug>. No no hell no. flatfish never agreed to stop trolling. He lied about his trolling of course. So he changed his story to Snit Glasser "mentioning" him. -- Get Rich Slow https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8 https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4 Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 15:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr4knkF8vetU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457723 |
On 7/16/18 2:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >>> Nor does ascribing one with such a broad brush prove anything; this >>> is the issue Snit has, he paints everything 'good vs evil', which is BS. >> >> It is BS, yet you still claim it. Well, at least you are admitting to how you lie about me now. > > So stop it already I am not capable of stopping your BS. Nor, it seems are you. > ... the world is as simple as good vs. evil. You just > wrote: > > "Curious, what is your solution to poverty and homelessness? > > For me it is, in broad strokes, not that hard... " > > It's so 'not that hard' that everyone should be doing it, right? Everyone should be doing the things I list that the government should be doing? Maybe you mean everyone should support those things? But that does not make much sense given how I specifically asked Slimer for his views. So what are you even trying to say? > Grow a brain already, the world is much more complicated > than your dream.\ > >>>> God Damn, you right-wingers are filthy. >>> >>> Yeah, like that... way too broad a brush. >>> >>> The fall out of identity politics is that certain terms no longer have >>> any valuable meaning: >>> >>> Left >>> Right >>> Liberal >>> Conservative >>> Racist >>> Sexist >>> Feminist >>> >>> ... and several others. >> >> Just because YOU do not get meaning from a term > > LOL! > > Most everyone calling themselves a 'liberal' or a 'conservative' has a > different meaning for them so they have been rendered meaningless > for any useful discussion. And yet we can, generally, say with strong confidence that liberals will tend to back equal rights and conservatives will tend to support special entitlements. We can get more specific than that. In general: Liberals will fit MOST of these they - accept the basics of climate science - back evidence-based regulations to protect air and water - back policies which reduce the number of abortions - will back a woman's right to an abortion - will back regulations to reduce air and water pollution - will back worker rights - will back equal rights - will back regulations to keep food safe - will work to help make sure every eligible person can vote Conservatives tend to NOT fit those things as well, and with the exception of libertarians tend to be against most of those. They tend to promote entitlements for whites, Christians, males, heterosexuals, and the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that this will somehow help others. But if you think I am wrong let us look at examples. Below you apparently are talking to voices in your head or whatever... not even making a point relevant to my views. > Everyone knows this... but it hits the lib > politicians much harder because they're the basis for their existence > so they have no choice but to latch on. > > Grow the necessary clue, when telling people what they want to hear > no longer works it's only results that matter and all the SJW BS goes > out the f*cking window... for awhile, anyway. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 15:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4b33e7fc-d0df-43d3-9e35-c02f19356297@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457738 |
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 3:32:24 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/16/18 2:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > > >>> Nor does ascribing one with such a broad brush prove anything; this > >>> is the issue Snit has, he paints everything 'good vs evil', which is BS. > >> > >> It is BS, yet you still claim it. Well, at least you are admitting to how you lie about me now. > > > > So stop it already > > I am not capable of stopping your BS. Nor, it seems are you. > > > ... the world is as simple as good vs. evil. You just > > wrote: > > > > "Curious, what is your solution to poverty and homelessness? > > > > For me it is, in broad strokes, not that hard... " > > > > It's so 'not that hard' that everyone should be doing it, right? > > Everyone should be doing the things I list that the government should be > doing? Maybe you mean everyone should support those things? But that > does not make much sense given how I specifically asked Slimer for his > views. > > So what are you even trying to say? > > > Grow a brain already, the world is much more complicated > > than your dream.\ > > > >>>> God Damn, you right-wingers are filthy. > >>> > >>> Yeah, like that... way too broad a brush. > >>> > >>> The fall out of identity politics is that certain terms no longer have > >>> any valuable meaning: > >>> > >>> Left > >>> Right > >>> Liberal > >>> Conservative > >>> Racist > >>> Sexist > >>> Feminist > >>> > >>> ... and several others. > >> > >> Just because YOU do not get meaning from a term > > > > LOL! > > > > Most everyone calling themselves a 'liberal' or a 'conservative' has a > > different meaning for them so they have been rendered meaningless > > for any useful discussion. > > And yet we can, generally, say with strong confidence that liberals will > tend to back equal rights and conservatives will tend to support special > entitlements. We can get more specific than that. In general: > > Liberals will fit MOST of these they > - accept the basics of climate science > - back evidence-based regulations to protect air and water > - back policies which reduce the number of abortions > - will back a woman's right to an abortion > - will back regulations to reduce air and water pollution > - will back worker rights > - will back equal rights > - will back regulations to keep food safe > - will work to help make sure every eligible person can vote > > Conservatives tend to NOT fit those things as well, and with the > exception of libertarians tend to be against most of those. They tend to > promote entitlements for whites, Christians, males, heterosexuals, and > the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing wealth to the very richest > in the nation with the idea that this will somehow help others. > > But if you think I am wrong let us look at examples. > > Below you apparently are talking to voices in your head or whatever... > not even making a point relevant to my views. > > > Everyone knows this... but it hits the lib > > politicians much harder because they're the basis for their existence > > so they have no choice but to latch on. > > > > Grow the necessary clue, when telling people what they want to hear > > no longer works it's only results that matter and all the SJW BS goes > > out the f*cking window... for awhile, anyway. > > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> I have known AI programs who argue better than you do. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! Klaus Schadenfreude created at least one major circus in the last year or so. I am sure he and the herd are proud. - What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!! http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_f8h9lv_-OPEN-WEBCAM---START-RECORD-- http://prescottcomputerguy.com http://www.5z8.info/hateminorities_t7l3gt_linked-in-of-sex Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d4153e81-9759-498d-b411-465042a2cdad@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457738 |
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 3:32:24 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/16/18 2:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > > >>> Nor does ascribing one with such a broad brush prove anything; this > >>> is the issue Snit has, he paints everything 'good vs evil', which is BS. > >> > >> It is BS, yet you still claim it. Well, at least you are admitting to how you lie about me now. > > > > So stop it already > > I am not capable of stopping your BS. Nor, it seems are you. > > > ... the world is as simple as good vs. evil. You just > > wrote: > > > > "Curious, what is your solution to poverty and homelessness? > > > > For me it is, in broad strokes, not that hard... " > > > > It's so 'not that hard' that everyone should be doing it, right? > > Everyone should be doing the things I list that the government should be > doing? Maybe you mean everyone should support those things? But that > does not make much sense given how I specifically asked Slimer for his > views. > > So what are you even trying to say? > > > Grow a brain already, the world is much more complicated > > than your dream.\ > > > >>>> God Damn, you right-wingers are filthy. > >>> > >>> Yeah, like that... way too broad a brush. > >>> > >>> The fall out of identity politics is that certain terms no longer have > >>> any valuable meaning: > >>> > >>> Left > >>> Right > >>> Liberal > >>> Conservative > >>> Racist > >>> Sexist > >>> Feminist > >>> > >>> ... and several others. > >> > >> Just because YOU do not get meaning from a term > > > > LOL! > > > > Most everyone calling themselves a 'liberal' or a 'conservative' has a > > different meaning for them so they have been rendered meaningless > > for any useful discussion. > > And yet we can, generally, say with strong confidence that liberals will > tend to back equal rights and conservatives will tend to support special > entitlements. We can get more specific than that. In general: > > Liberals will fit MOST of these they > - accept the basics of climate science > - back evidence-based regulations to protect air and water > - back policies which reduce the number of abortions > - will back a woman's right to an abortion > - will back regulations to reduce air and water pollution > - will back worker rights > - will back equal rights > - will back regulations to keep food safe > - will work to help make sure every eligible person can vote > > Conservatives tend to NOT fit those things as well, and with the > exception of libertarians tend to be against most of those. They tend to > promote entitlements for whites, Christians, males, heterosexuals, and > the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing wealth to the very richest > in the nation with the idea that this will somehow help others. > > But if you think I am wrong let us look at examples. > > Below you apparently are talking to voices in your head or whatever... > not even making a point relevant to my views. > > > Everyone knows this... but it hits the lib > > politicians much harder because they're the basis for their existence > > so they have no choice but to latch on. > > > > Grow the necessary clue, when telling people what they want to hear > > no longer works it's only results that matter and all the SJW BS goes > > out the f*cking window... for awhile, anyway. > > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <328ae2c8-12e1-4830-b455-53187a4bc309@googlegroups.com>, Steve Carroll wrote: > > Sandman: > > <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood> It doesn't show what > > interval the script is run at, but how he has used it, at least in > > the beginning. I stopped logging it this way back in may :) > > From what I've personally looked at, it looks like it's all over the > map. Yes, with obvious scripted sessions. Not saying some of it isn't manual. > > Sandman: > > Maybe I'll update it :) > > What would it take to do that? For "later" to occur! <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/postingtimes/Snit/Flooding> That's a running tally of Snit's non-sock posts and his flooding during the last month. It'll update automatically and always show the last two months. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZyKjaAAoJECFEwfBaA+jR4QEIAIWE3GfOGnnxynLfUhRnWv+l OkvAvQ8GofGI1JjIOn7NnlyfGRV/JPiIzJmzoCrdV6uY9E9qaYOXScF4M5Vas4bv 2WqBlNIh7se9g6Zkj330L12RkuZckS5l0nJ++OTbmztOzLtAlrWKHADTiJ9u8JnR BCjcAhMrjQ0Jwut34hJr57pzj7p88oYCPP46IcrEMbWnd03n43BGUVLGr9i9pYU+ 7F6867hOzaFJ4DdRE52zv15yIYVUIHx7HFNNtV7ZfPRBRQQuyA403S8PM1RC/nQ/ RKau+ma21bzltpxlqTO+XAXMMLLZiGXy8hbv4Ib/tPlc5cKI3P6UDZ4exbbCmnE= =1Dqa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - Eight things to never feed your cat https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0 http://www.macadvocacy.pw/2005/Nov/09/236626.html Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 16:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6f7a2bea-b6a4-4a00-88a7-6d539aa0680c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457738 |
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 4:32:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/16/18 2:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > > >>> Nor does ascribing one with such a broad brush prove anything; this > >>> is the issue Snit has, he paints everything 'good vs evil', which is BS. > >> > >> It is BS, yet you still claim it. Well, at least you are admitting to how you lie about me now. > > > > So stop it already > > I am not capable of stopping your BS. Nor, it seems are you. > > > ... the world is as simple as good vs. evil. Correction: The world *isn't* as simple as good vs. evil. > > You just > > wrote: > > > > "Curious, what is your solution to poverty and homelessness? > > > > For me it is, in broad strokes, not that hard... " > > > > It's so 'not that hard' that everyone should be doing it, right? > > Everyone should be doing the things I list that the government should be > doing? Maybe you mean everyone should support those things? But that > does not make much sense given how I specifically asked Slimer for his > views. > > So what are you even trying to say? I said it already... if yo need to see it again: The world is *much* more complicated than your little dream. > >>>> God Damn, you right-wingers are filthy. > >>> > >>> Yeah, like that... way too broad a brush. > >>> > >>> The fall out of identity politics is that certain terms no longer have > >>> any valuable meaning: > >>> > >>> Left > >>> Right > >>> Liberal > >>> Conservative > >>> Racist > >>> Sexist > >>> Feminist And you can add "bigot" to the list. People like you have rendered many words meaningless through improper use. In your effort to 'shame' everyone you disagree with you've destroyed useful tools you once had. This is what created the 'echo' chamber of politics, "others" tune people like you out. When you have guys like Noam Chomsky pointing out the issues with neoliberalism you know you've blown it up. > >>> ... and several others. > >> > >> Just because YOU do not get meaning from a term > > > > LOL! > > > > Most everyone calling themselves a 'liberal' or a 'conservative' has a > > different meaning for them so they have been rendered meaningless > > for any useful discussion. > > And yet we can, generally, say with strong confidence that liberals will > tend to back equal rights and conservatives will tend to support special > entitlements. No, "we" can't say that because the terms have no meaning anymore that can be agreed upon. When people can't agree on word meanings they can't have a useful conversation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 17:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr4q3qF8venU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457746 |
On 7/16/18 4:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 4:32:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/16/18 2:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> ... >> >>>>> Nor does ascribing one with such a broad brush prove anything; this >>>>> is the issue Snit has, he paints everything 'good vs evil', which is BS. >>>> >>>> It is BS, yet you still claim it. Well, at least you are admitting to how you lie about me now. >>> >>> So stop it already >> >> I am not capable of stopping your BS. Nor, it seems are you. >> >>> ... the world is as simple as good vs. evil. > > Correction: The world *isn't* as simple as good vs. evil. > >>> You just >>> wrote: >>> >>> "Curious, what is your solution to poverty and homelessness? >>> >>> For me it is, in broad strokes, not that hard... " >>> >>> It's so 'not that hard' that everyone should be doing it, right? >> >> Everyone should be doing the things I list that the government should be >> doing? Maybe you mean everyone should support those things? But that >> does not make much sense given how I specifically asked Slimer for his >> views. >> >> So what are you even trying to say? > > I said it already... if yo need to see it again: > > The world is *much* more complicated than your little dream. > >>>>>> God Damn, you right-wingers are filthy. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, like that... way too broad a brush. >>>>> >>>>> The fall out of identity politics is that certain terms no longer have >>>>> any valuable meaning: >>>>> >>>>> Left >>>>> Right >>>>> Liberal >>>>> Conservative >>>>> Racist >>>>> Sexist >>>>> Feminist > > And you can add "bigot" to the list. People like you have > rendered many words meaningless through improper use. > In your effort to 'shame' everyone you disagree with you've > destroyed useful tools you once had. This is what created > the 'echo' chamber of politics, "others" tune people like you > out. When you have guys like Noam Chomsky pointing out > the issues with neoliberalism you know you've blown it up. > >>>>> ... and several others. >>>> >>>> Just because YOU do not get meaning from a term >>> >>> LOL! >>> >>> Most everyone calling themselves a 'liberal' or a 'conservative' has a >>> different meaning for them so they have been rendered meaningless >>> for any useful discussion. >> >> And yet we can, generally, say with strong confidence that liberals will >> tend to back equal rights and conservatives will tend to support special >> entitlements. > > No, "we" can't say that because the terms have no meaning anymore > that can be agreed upon. When people can't agree on word meanings > they can't have a useful conversation. > Nobody said, suggested, hinted, or implied the world is black and white, good and evil. You pushed that as a straw man. Then you admitted it was BS... then you attributed it to me again. Then you claim I work to shame folks who disagree, but give no examples... again working to put me on the defensive with vague and meaningless insults. You speak of my wanting an echo chamber which is the exact opposite of truth, and another attempt of yours to change the topic to your fantasies of me and to put me on the defensive. And, of course, you snipped the prime content about politics and views. You have NO desire to talk about political views... you refuse, for example, to speak of your suggestions on how to deal with homelessness (Slimer also ran from that). You two are insecure and just want to lash out. So be it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 17:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <125ed9a6-136f-4fca-bf09-e3c7079d1067@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457754 |
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 6:04:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Nobody said, suggested, hinted, or implied the world is black and white, > good and evil. You have, and it sits at the heart of virtually every political argument you've made in the last 15 years. > Then you claim I work to shame folks who disagree There is no question that's most of what you do. People on every side of every aisle you can find are aware of this. Next to your blatant dishonesty, which is heavily tied to it, this is one of the biggest reasons people will have nothing to do with you. You're a 'victim' who seeks out an 'abuser', no sane person could ever argue against that point. Someone did a number on you, we're all aware of this fact. > again working to put me on the defensive with vague and > meaningless insults. No, they're just facts. > You speak of my wanting an echo chamber which is the exact opposite of > truth You have nothing to do with the truth, you've no use for it. We're all aware of that, too. > And, of course, you snipped the prime content about politics and views. There is no "prime content" where you are concerned, it's always the same garbage you've always spewed. > You have NO desire to talk about political views... It's not possible with you, you regularly use terms that have no meaning and you dismiss even the most concrete evidence that can ever be produced. Who *hasn't* seen you do this on virtually *any* topic? If what I'm saying were false, why are you so avoided? You have no reasonable explanation for that fact, you'll respond with some goofy delusion that will further prove the point.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 17:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr4seeF8venU11@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457771 |
On 7/16/18 5:34 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 6:04:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Nobody said, suggested, hinted, or implied the world is black and white, >> good and evil. > > You have, and it sits at the heart of virtually every political > argument you've made in the last 15 years. > >> Then you claim I work to shame folks who disagree > > There is no question that's most of what you do. People on > every side of every aisle you can find are aware of this. Next > to your blatant dishonesty, which is heavily tied to it, this is > one of the biggest reasons people will have nothing to do > with you. You're a 'victim' who seeks out an 'abuser', no > sane person could ever argue against that point. Someone > did a number on you, we're all aware of this fact. > >> again working to put me on the defensive with vague and >> meaningless insults. > > No, they're just facts. > >> You speak of my wanting an echo chamber which is the exact opposite of >> truth > > You have nothing to do with the truth, you've no use for it. We're > all aware of that, too. > >> And, of course, you snipped the prime content about politics and views. > > There is no "prime content" where you are concerned, it's always > the same garbage you've always spewed. > >> You have NO desire to talk about political views... > > It's not possible with you, you regularly use terms that have no > meaning and you dismiss even the most concrete evidence that > can ever be produced. Who *hasn't* seen you do this on virtually > *any* topic? If what I'm saying were false, why are you so avoided? > You have no reasonable explanation for that fact, you'll respond > with some goofy delusion that will further prove the point. > Ah, instead of speaking of politics you want to put me on the defensive by pretending to speak for me. Instead why not talk about your ideas for reducing homelessness and poverty? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 19:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <plszbv8003ga.ahy@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #457682 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > RonB wrote: > >> SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >>> >>> Do you consider it normal for homosexuals to _choose_ to be infected with >>> AIDS and to promote it as an upgrade to their lifestyle? Do you consider >>> it normal for grown men to parade themselves around naked in the middle >>> of the day on a public street to promote their lifestyle to little kids? >> >>Of course the libtards will make excuses for this kind of deviant, perverted >>behavior. > > You speak of liberals being "gullible", when you take the pack of lies > that "Slimer" posted, above at face-value? > > Listen, outside of some tiny number who are truly mentally-ill, > homosexuals do not choose to be infected with AIDS and to promote it > as an upgrade to their lifestyle. > > I mean, you just could not make-up a more ridiculous *lie* than that. > > Neither do they "parade themselves around naked in the middle of the > day on a public street to promote their lifestyle to little kids". We > have a Pride parade in my town, and no such thing occurred. > > No, some freakish exception to the rule does not "prove your case". > > God Damn, you right-wingers are filthy. > This is filthy: https://tinyurl.com/yczfw3v4 https://www.google.com/search?q=gay+pride+parade+children&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj065zgrKTcAhUE2lMKHVVOCDUQ_AUICigB&biw=1361&bih=721
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 13:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr4e69F7oknU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457694 |
On 7/16/18 12:30 PM, owl wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> RonB wrote: >> >>> SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >>>> >>>> Do you consider it normal for homosexuals to _choose_ to be infected with >>>> AIDS and to promote it as an upgrade to their lifestyle? Do you consider >>>> it normal for grown men to parade themselves around naked in the middle >>>> of the day on a public street to promote their lifestyle to little kids? >>> >>> Of course the libtards will make excuses for this kind of deviant, perverted >>> behavior. >> >> You speak of liberals being "gullible", when you take the pack of lies >> that "Slimer" posted, above at face-value? >> >> Listen, outside of some tiny number who are truly mentally-ill, >> homosexuals do not choose to be infected with AIDS and to promote it >> as an upgrade to their lifestyle. >> >> I mean, you just could not make-up a more ridiculous *lie* than that. >> >> Neither do they "parade themselves around naked in the middle of the >> day on a public street to promote their lifestyle to little kids". We >> have a Pride parade in my town, and no such thing occurred. >> >> No, some freakish exception to the rule does not "prove your case". >> >> God Damn, you right-wingers are filthy. >> > > This is filthy: > > https://tinyurl.com/yczfw3v4 > > https://www.google.com/search?q=gay+pride+parade+children&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj065zgrKTcAhUE2lMKHVVOCDUQ_AUICigB&biw=1361&bih=721 > Looked at a few of the images and have no issue with them. Do you... and if so, which ones? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 19:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <SC63D.253460$IF4.89323@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #457682 |
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 14:11:21 -0500, chrisv wrote: > RonB wrote: > >> SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >>> >>> Do you consider it normal for homosexuals to _choose_ to be infected >>> with AIDS and to promote it as an upgrade to their lifestyle? Do you >>> consider it normal for grown men to parade themselves around naked in >>> the middle of the day on a public street to promote their lifestyle to >>> little kids? >> >>Of course the libtards will make excuses for this kind of deviant, >>perverted behavior. > > You speak of liberals being "gullible", when you take the pack of lies > that "Slimer" posted, above at face-value? You didn't bother to snip my supposed lie before calling me a liar so I challenge your assessment and will _GLADLY_ demonstrate you to be a naive fool. <https://www.out.com/news-opinion/2013/08/02/men-who-want-aids-bronx-new- york> <https://knowledgenuts.com/2013/10/04/the-bug-chasers-who-actually-want- to-get-hivaids/> <https://aidsetc.org/blog/bug-chasers-gay-men-and-intentional-pursuit-hiv- narrative-analysis> <https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/bug-chasing-men-deliberately- trying-2033433> > Listen, outside of some tiny number who are truly mentally-ill, > homosexuals do not choose to be infected with AIDS and to promote it as > an upgrade to their lifestyle. > > I mean, you just could not make-up a more ridiculous *lie* than that. The above is becoming a much more powerful trend and I actually _have_ homosexual friends who can testify to the fact that there are countless people on Grindr offering to infect and looking to be infected. > Neither do they "parade themselves around naked in the middle of the day > on a public street to promote their lifestyle to little kids". We have > a Pride parade in my town, and no such thing occurred. Lie. Now, if I showed you a photo, you'd claim I doctored it so here is a Youtube video <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIAfQUOwKYs> And now web sites <https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/ny-city- gay-pride-parade-exposes-kids-to-nudity-lewdness-vulgarity> <http://www.nategowdy.com/blog/2014/7/10/in-the-news-seattle-pride-parade- highlights> <http://www.returnofkings.com/65920/pride-parades-a-pathetic-and- detrimental-attempt-at-promoting-gay-rights> Note that these things happened in _NEW YORK_ and places like Seattle so the news should have covered it as a crime of exhibitionism at the very least. Instead, your Socialist news system covered it up entirely. The fact that you would support this kind of shite is a testament to how flaccid you are as a Socialist "man." Real men would have stood up to this. > No, some freakish exception to the rule does not "prove your case". > > God Damn, you right-wingers are filthy. Sure, *we* are the filthy ones, not the "men" who protect a bunch of homosexuals waving their dicks at little children in public.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 18:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ab08g803a.ypl5@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #457651 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > >> (snipped, unread, other than a quite glimpse, revealing a claim that I was "hateful") > > Yeah, I'm the "hateful" one, here. (rolling eyes) > > Are the views and behaviours of homosexuals *really* a "threat to > everything decent and normal in society", "Slimer"? > > Is accepting homosexuals *really* some kind of slippery-slope toward > pedophilia and bestiality? > http://caldronpool.com/tedx-speaker-says-pedophilia-is-a-natural-sexual-orientation/ <quote> During a TEDx Talk, Mirjam Heine from University of Würzburg claimed “pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation, just like heterosexuality.” “According to current research, pedophilia is an unchangeable sexual orientation,” Heine argued. “Just like, for example, heterosexuality. No one chooses to be a pedophile. No one can cease being one.” ... “We should accept that pedophiles are people who have not chosen their sexuality… We should accept that pedophilia is a sexual preference, a thought, a feeling, and not an act. </quote> https://www.ted.com/tedx/events/24068 <quote> Mirjam Heine Medical Student ... She is mainly guided by the works of Prof Dr. Dr. Beier, the head of the institute for sexology and sexual medicine at the University Hospital Berlin and the prevention network “Kein Täter Werden” (meaning “don’t offend”). </quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 18:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sB53D.213038$la4.102988@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #457663 |
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:32:10 +0000, owl wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> (snipped, unread, other than a quite glimpse, revealing a claim that I >>> was "hateful") >> >> Yeah, I'm the "hateful" one, here. (rolling eyes) >> >> Are the views and behaviours of homosexuals *really* a "threat to >> everything decent and normal in society", "Slimer"? >> >> Is accepting homosexuals *really* some kind of slippery-slope toward >> pedophilia and bestiality? >> >> > http://caldronpool.com/tedx-speaker-says-pedophilia-is-a-natural-sexual- orientation/ > <quote> > During a TEDx Talk, Mirjam Heine from University of Würzburg claimed > “pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation, just like heterosexuality.” > “According to current research, pedophilia is an unchangeable sexual > orientation,” Heine argued. “Just like, for example, > heterosexuality. No one chooses to be a pedophile. No one can cease > being one.” > ... > “We should accept that pedophiles are people who have not chosen their > sexuality… We should accept that pedophilia is a sexual preference, > a thought, a feeling, and not an act. > </quote> > > https://www.ted.com/tedx/events/24068 <quote> > Mirjam Heine Medical Student ... > She is mainly guided by the works of Prof Dr. Dr. Beier, the head of the > institute for sexology and sexual medicine at the University Hospital > Berlin and the prevention network “Kein Täter Werden” > (meaning “don’t offend”). > </quote> Great links.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 18:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <piippf$v2a$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #457663 |
On 2018-07-16, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> (snipped, unread, other than a quite glimpse, revealing a claim that I was "hateful") >> >> Yeah, I'm the "hateful" one, here. (rolling eyes) >> >> Are the views and behaviours of homosexuals *really* a "threat to >> everything decent and normal in society", "Slimer"? >> >> Is accepting homosexuals *really* some kind of slippery-slope toward >> pedophilia and bestiality? >> > > http://caldronpool.com/tedx-speaker-says-pedophilia-is-a-natural-sexual-orientation/ ><quote> > During a TEDx Talk, Mirjam Heine from University of Würzburg > claimed “pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation, just like > heterosexuality.” > “According to current research, pedophilia is an unchangeable > sexual orientation,” Heine argued. “Just like, for example, > heterosexuality. No one chooses to be a pedophile. No one can cease > being one.” > ... > “We should accept that pedophiles are people who have not chosen their > sexuality… We should accept that pedophilia is a sexual preference, > a thought, a feeling, and not an act. ></quote> > > https://www.ted.com/tedx/events/24068 ><quote> > Mirjam Heine > Medical Student > ... > She is mainly guided by the works of Prof Dr. Dr. Beier, the head > of the institute for sexology and sexual medicine at the University > Hospital Berlin and the prevention network “Kein Täter Werden” > (meaning “don’t offend”). ></quote> I heard a slimeball homosexual pervert pedophile on a radio show claiming that "straight" men like young girls, why shouldn't homosexuals like young boys." (Uh, because it's because it's pedophilia, slimeball.) What does chrisv think NAMBLA is all about? And why is NAMBLA allowed to exist in this country? Obviously perverts in our government allow it to exist. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 19:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Qb63D.253457$IF4.11049@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #457676 |
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:56:47 +0000, RonB wrote: > On 2018-07-16, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>> >>>> (snipped, unread, other than a quite glimpse, revealing a claim that >>>> I was "hateful") >>> >>> Yeah, I'm the "hateful" one, here. (rolling eyes) >>> >>> Are the views and behaviours of homosexuals *really* a "threat to >>> everything decent and normal in society", "Slimer"? >>> >>> Is accepting homosexuals *really* some kind of slippery-slope toward >>> pedophilia and bestiality? >>> >>> >> http://caldronpool.com/tedx-speaker-says-pedophilia-is-a-natural- sexual-orientation/ >><quote> >> During a TEDx Talk, Mirjam Heine from University of Würzburg claimed >> “pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation, just like >> heterosexuality.” >> “According to current research, pedophilia is an unchangeable sexual >> orientation,” Heine argued. “Just like, for example, >> heterosexuality. No one chooses to be a pedophile. No one can cease >> being one.” >> ... >> “We should accept that pedophiles are people who have not chosen their >> sexuality… We should accept that pedophilia is a sexual preference, >> a thought, a feeling, and not an act. >></quote> >> >> https://www.ted.com/tedx/events/24068 >><quote> >> Mirjam Heine Medical Student ... >> She is mainly guided by the works of Prof Dr. Dr. Beier, the head of >> the institute for sexology and sexual medicine at the University >> Hospital Berlin and the prevention network “Kein Täter Werden” >> (meaning “don’t offend”). >></quote> > > I heard a slimeball homosexual pervert pedophile on a radio show > claiming that "straight" men like young girls, why shouldn't homosexuals > like young boys." (Uh, because it's because it's pedophilia, slimeball.) > > What does chrisv think NAMBLA is all about? And why is NAMBLA allowed to > exist in this country? Obviously perverts in our government allow it to > exist. Because there are a lot of homosexuals in Socialist positions of power. Obama is an excellent example. <https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 13:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr4ejtF7ojsU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457687 |
On 7/16/18 12:18 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:56:47 +0000, RonB wrote: > >> On 2018-07-16, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> (snipped, unread, other than a quite glimpse, revealing a claim that >>>>> I was "hateful") >>>> >>>> Yeah, I'm the "hateful" one, here. (rolling eyes) >>>> >>>> Are the views and behaviours of homosexuals *really* a "threat to >>>> everything decent and normal in society", "Slimer"? >>>> >>>> Is accepting homosexuals *really* some kind of slippery-slope toward >>>> pedophilia and bestiality? >>>> >>>> >>> http://caldronpool.com/tedx-speaker-says-pedophilia-is-a-natural- > sexual-orientation/ >>> <quote> >>> During a TEDx Talk, Mirjam Heine from University of Würzburg claimed >>> “pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation, just like >>> heterosexuality.” >>> “According to current research, pedophilia is an unchangeable sexual >>> orientation,” Heine argued. “Just like, for example, >>> heterosexuality. No one chooses to be a pedophile. No one can cease >>> being one.” >>> ... >>> “We should accept that pedophiles are people who have not chosen their >>> sexuality… We should accept that pedophilia is a sexual preference, >>> a thought, a feeling, and not an act. >>> </quote> >>> >>> https://www.ted.com/tedx/events/24068 >>> <quote> >>> Mirjam Heine Medical Student ... >>> She is mainly guided by the works of Prof Dr. Dr. Beier, the head of >>> the institute for sexology and sexual medicine at the University >>> Hospital Berlin and the prevention network “Kein Täter Werden” >>> (meaning “don’t offend”). >>> </quote> >> >> I heard a slimeball homosexual pervert pedophile on a radio show >> claiming that "straight" men like young girls, why shouldn't homosexuals >> like young boys." (Uh, because it's because it's pedophilia, slimeball.) >> >> What does chrisv think NAMBLA is all about? And why is NAMBLA allowed to >> exist in this country? Obviously perverts in our government allow it to >> exist. > > Because there are a lot of homosexuals in Socialist positions of power. > Obama is an excellent example. <https://www.youtube.com/watch? > v=z4pwiGuG5r4> > Now you are claiming Obama is gay. For crying out loud... please TRY to come back to reality some day. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 13:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <doppkd93vbajlunggdl399dd5bl6hk6lq5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #457651 |
chrisv wrote: > "Slimer" and "owl" responses were deleted, unread. They're getting foamed-up, and I'm trying to avoid the spittle. -- "Dont even begin to suggest the same % of Windows users have issues as they don't." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 18:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <CN53D.253453$IF4.181560@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #457667 |
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:44:08 -0500, chrisv wrote: > chrisv wrote: > > >> > "Slimer" and "owl" responses were deleted, unread. chrisv proving that what I said about how Socialist leftists behave is correct. Like every other "liberal," he will only read whatever supports his pre-existing ideas. The opposition must be silenced at all costs (or snipped) and their position suppressed! > They're getting foamed-up, and I'm trying to avoid the spittle. Sure you are. You're just a coward like a true Socialist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 18:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <piimgv$bv8$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #457646 |
On 2018-07-16, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:22:47 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> owl wrote: >> >>>It's not their "right" to collaborate with the enemy. >> >> Like Trump did? > > Mueller has been looking for evidence of that for two years now and not > found any. However, that doesn't matter to leftists, does it? You will > continue to make the claim that Trump did it when there is a mountain of > proof that the _Democrats_ were the ones colluding with the country. This is the way the lying pile of shit Mueller always works. Talk about your "McCarthyism" (as traditionally understood). -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 17:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <piim72$bv8$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #457614 |
On 2018-07-16, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > owl wrote: > >>It's not their "right" to collaborate with the enemy. > > Like Trump did? Sure. And your evidence is ... claims from those who gave Hillary Clinton a free ride for treason? Color me unconvinced. > Sorry, but what some right-wing propagandist claims that some > "collaborated with the enemy", it means nothing at all. It's all > twisted through right-wing hatred. Right. Because there have never been spies or collusion with the enemy in the United States. It must be nice living there in La La Land. >>The only people who get away with professing right-wing or Christian >>beliefs > > Maybe someone might believe your (or Slimers's) claims, if you did not > spew such obvious nonsense. > > Right-wingers like to accuse others of *exactly* what right-wingers > are guilty of. Which is ... ? -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web