Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #448359 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-17 00:32 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-04-23 13:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 266 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-17 00:32 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 08:18 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-17 13:12 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 13:46 -0700
Amazon, Google, Apple, MicroSoft, China, and Russia. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-17 15:04 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 07:00 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 05:01 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-18 06:40 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 08:53 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-18 11:12 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 13:29 -0500
At Amazon, Profit == Waste. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-18 07:18 -0700
Re: At Amazon, Profit == Waste. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 10:32 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-18 10:59 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 13:18 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-18 11:25 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 13:34 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 15:35 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 23:07 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-18 11:19 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-18 14:33 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-18 13:23 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-19 03:59 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-19 06:58 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-19 11:27 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-19 11:52 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 03:52 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 04:16 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-20 06:58 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 05:20 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 06:09 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 06:22 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-20 08:31 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 06:56 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-20 09:23 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-20 11:06 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-20 16:19 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-20 09:33 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 09:49 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-20 10:25 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 10:31 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-20 11:03 -0700
Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-20 12:57 -0700
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-20 15:30 -0500
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 13:40 -0700
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-20 23:47 +0000
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 10:32 -0700
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 16:45 -0500
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-20 18:33 -0400
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:59 -0500
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-21 13:33 -0400
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-21 18:17 +0000
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 19:38 -0500
Re: Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 17:48 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-21 07:38 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-21 15:14 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 08:28 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 08:57 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-21 17:10 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-21 17:14 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 10:23 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-21 15:41 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 10:31 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 11:24 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 12:20 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 12:30 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 12:33 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 14:00 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 15:21 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 15:36 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 08:43 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 09:03 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 09:37 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 09:45 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 10:30 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 11:46 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 11:51 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 07:09 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 05:17 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-24 18:00 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 15:14 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 15:50 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 16:02 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 00:02 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 17:15 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 02:38 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-25 10:55 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-25 11:39 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-21 12:43 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-20 11:49 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-20 10:24 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-21 12:48 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 10:18 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 10:13 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-21 07:34 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-21 13:39 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-22 08:48 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-22 10:11 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:27 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-20 16:19 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-20 09:20 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-20 11:44 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-20 10:16 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-20 13:07 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-20 11:50 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 12:42 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-20 22:48 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-21 03:55 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 04:33 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-21 15:23 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-21 12:05 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 12:49 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-20 22:45 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-20 19:12 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-04-20 22:54 +0100
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 09:46 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 11:13 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-20 11:37 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 12:37 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-20 23:00 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-21 04:19 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-21 14:53 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-21 12:04 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-21 15:49 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-21 15:57 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-21 12:38 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-21 19:56 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-21 14:01 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-21 23:15 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:06 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-22 15:18 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-22 11:25 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 11:01 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-22 16:18 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 09:32 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-22 16:44 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-22 16:45 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 15:38 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-22 18:04 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 15:33 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 07:12 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 12:44 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-24 14:36 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 08:41 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 10:58 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 11:20 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 11:27 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 12:23 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 12:30 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 14:00 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 15:22 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 15:36 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 08:43 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 11:42 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-22 11:58 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 12:14 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 12:29 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 12:41 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-21 15:38 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-21 23:17 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-22 09:50 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:19 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:08 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-22 00:07 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-22 09:59 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-22 14:06 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-22 10:09 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-22 15:13 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-22 11:24 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:29 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-22 18:02 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 15:33 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:26 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-22 15:30 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:34 -0700
What Apple gave us. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-23 10:03 -0700
Re: What Apple gave us. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 10:33 -0700
Re: What Apple gave us. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 11:47 -0700
Re: What Apple gave us. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 11:21 -0700
Re: What Apple gave us. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-23 15:35 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:25 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:21 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:10 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 13:25 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-21 15:42 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-21 23:19 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:08 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-22 00:06 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-22 00:53 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 18:20 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:09 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-21 13:11 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-20 13:41 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 12:39 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-20 14:57 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 13:22 -0700
Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-20 13:59 -0700
Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 14:47 -0700
Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-20 22:34 +0000
Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-21 07:40 -0400
Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 05:50 -0700
Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 07:41 -0700
Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 10:40 -0700
Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-20 23:39 +0000
Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 10:30 -0700
Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 12:22 -0700
60 search providers pre-installed across more than 90 languages. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-21 01:24 -0700
Re: 60 search providers pre-installed across more than 90 languages. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 02:12 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-21 18:03 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-21 15:39 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-22 00:07 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 08:11 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-22 16:15 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 09:31 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-22 16:47 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 10:00 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 10:44 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-22 11:21 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 11:37 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 17:17 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 11:03 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 12:41 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 12:52 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 13:24 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-20 23:28 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-21 12:38 -0400
Apple can't invest, not like Samsung or Amazon; it's profit sans reason. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-20 07:51 -0700
Re: Apple can't invest, not like Samsung or Amazon; it's profit sans reason. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 08:28 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 06:31 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-20 08:41 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-20 10:17 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 21:08 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-20 14:20 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-21 07:43 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-21 13:40 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-22 08:50 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-22 10:10 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-22 16:51 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-23 03:01 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 03:12 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-21 17:53 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-21 13:28 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 00:20 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-18 10:38 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-18 16:03 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-18 22:19 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 21:48 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-19 07:33 -0500
Hey COLA Tard, ... it is the Linux DE. Or should it be: UBUNTU/Linux DE? Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 05:42 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 05:54 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-19 11:43 -0400
Re: Where's The Advocacy? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 20:34 +0000
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-20 19:13 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 02:59 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-18 10:35 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-18 11:17 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-18 12:07 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-18 13:34 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 18:59 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 14:17 -0500
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 12:16 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 13:28 -0700
Russell is the freak! Please die and get it over with, Poco. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 02:27 -0700
Re: Russell is the freak! Please die and get it over with, Poco. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 02:30 -0700
Use Linux anyway you want to, Poco! Moi certainly does. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 05:24 -0700
Re: Where's The Advocacy? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 13:27 -0700
Page 11 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 Next page →
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 05:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. |
| Message-ID | <d25e65dd-8998-4d7b-ba6c-d0ca16e2b95a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448640 |
On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 4:57:23 AM UTC-7, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > On 2018-04-20, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:00:01 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>> > Firefox ... yeah, its been a pretty good browser. > >>> > Does it shine though? > >>> > >>> Hell yes, it does; FireFox is the best, by far; > >> > >> I'd say best depends on the user, for example, if you're a web developer > >> you might say FF is 2nd best to Chrome. > > > > Hm, I really don't like Chrome. > > It has issues, but I still use it as my main browser on Win/Lin. > > -- > You have an ambitious nature and may make a name for yourself. Donny Karcie reported Staci M. Elliot years ago. As expected, it did zilch to derail the dunderhead. You are safe as a Wayland user can be. The content is a bunch of bullshit. Only glue sniffing would lead to that. -- "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 07:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. |
| Message-ID | <256c38bb-b3e0-4796-bfb5-188fbb6a9baa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448640 |
On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 4:57:23 AM UTC-7, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > On 2018-04-20, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:00:01 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>> > Firefox ... yeah, its been a pretty good browser. > >>> > Does it shine though? > >>> > >>> Hell yes, it does; FireFox is the best, by far; > >> > >> I'd say best depends on the user, for example, if you're a web developer > >> you might say FF is 2nd best to Chrome. > > > > Hm, I really don't like Chrome. > > It has issues, but I still use it as my main browser on Win/Lin. > > -- > You have an ambitious nature and may make a name for yourself. It was Satan who got caught using tons of forgeries over and over, and these are 'people' who come basically out of the blue directly into threads where he was being ripped apart... over and over for over a decade. LXQt is likely my second favorite DE and the only one I advocate to Mac newbies. Primary interface is MATE, though. A modern look is all you need after you learn the basics. Richard Stallman is a false advocate's biggest fear. What do you get out of lying, Satan? Nobody who isn't just using you for erotic aim (isn't a sock/shill) sees you as anything remotely close to honest. You have few but yourself to credit for that. - My Snoring Solution https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 10:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. |
| Message-ID | <ff4678c7-ea10-46c0-9239-17a4aee5522f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448609 |
On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 4:34:09 PM UTC-6, Melzzzzz wrote: > On 2018-04-20, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:00:01 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> > Firefox ... yeah, its been a pretty good browser. > >> > Does it shine though? > >> > >> Hell yes, it does; FireFox is the best, by far; > > > > I'd say best depends on the user, for example, if you're a web developer > > you might say FF is 2nd best to Chrome. > > Hm, I really don't like Chrome. ... and you might not say it ;) What browser do you prefer and why?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-20 23:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. |
| Message-ID | <pbdtnc41ic0@news2.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #448606 |
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:47:09 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > I'd say best depends on the user, for example, if you're a web developer > you might say FF is 2nd best to Chrome. > Only ad idiot asshole like you actually ranks browsers. A browser is merely a wrapper around a rendering engine. The mozilla engine is called "gecko" and ANY software can incorporate it. One of my favorite "no fucking nonsense" and "no fucking bloat" browsers was a project called Skipstone: http://www.muhri.net/skipstone Sadly, skipstone fails to compile with latest gecko. It should be maintained. So take your bloated do-it-all-for-you browser mentality and shove it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 10:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. |
| Message-ID | <53e896bc-e97f-4d79-b03c-a8b5bf3223d0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448615 |
On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 5:39:39 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:47:09 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > I'd say best depends on the user, for example, if you're a web developer > > you might say FF is 2nd best to Chrome. > > > > Only ad idiot asshole like you actually ranks browsers. So... on 'idiot assholes' have preferences ont things? > A browser is merely a wrapper around a rendering engine. BZZZT! Feeb fail #14,979. > The mozilla engine is called "gecko" and ANY software can > incorporate it. I currently have 4 different versions of Firefox on my computer right now. I know, you're too clueless to grasp why there even are any differences... it's OK ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 12:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. |
| Message-ID | <29c3e208-af49-4ca6-9dc3-40c181f794d3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448665 |
On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 10:30:24 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 5:39:39 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:47:09 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd say best depends on the user, for example, if you're a web developer > > > you might say FF is 2nd best to Chrome. > > > > > > > Only ad idiot asshole like you actually ranks browsers. > > So... on 'idiot assholes' have preferences ont things? > > > A browser is merely a wrapper around a rendering engine. > > BZZZT! Feeb fail #14,979. > > > The mozilla engine is called "gecko" and ANY software can > > incorporate it. > > I currently have 4 different versions of Firefox on my computer > right now. I know, you're too clueless to grasp why there even > are any differences... it's OK ;) Can emoticons be concatenated into a string with a logical connection to the "real" world; that is the question posed recently by those astonished at the fire-hose of nonsense from assorted google-posters and Cheetos smelling losers. William Unruh's cut down on the zillions of egotistical, insane threads he used to create but he is unchanged in the morality territory. He uses puppets more to produce those circuses. This forum is a puss-filled cyst. Budgie is probably my second favorite DE and the only one I recommend to Windows newbies. Primary interface is i3wm, though. Amazing customization is all you want after you install it. -- I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM http://alt.conspiracy.narkive.com/QcWYJ4Px/the-mentally-ill-mark-s-bilk Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 01:24 -0700 |
| Subject | 60 search providers pre-installed across more than 90 languages. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.21--1.24am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #448606 |
> > Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox.
>
> I thought they stopped in 2014 (a lot has happened to FF since then)
> when they went with the Yahoo deal?
WikiPedia says:
On December 20, 2011, Mozilla announced that the
contract [ with Google ] was once again renewed for
at least three years to November 2014, at three times
the amount previously paid, or nearly US$300 million annually.
WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Mozilla_Foundation#Financing
Nov 2017 "Blog.Mozilla.ORG" wrote:
Google will also become our new default search
provider in the United States, Canada, Hong Kong and Taiwan.
Firefox default search providers in other regions are
Yandex in Russia, Turkey, Belarus and Kazakhstan;
Baidu in China; and Google in the rest of the world.
Firefox has more choice in search providers than any
other browser with more than 60 search providers
pre-installed across more than 90 languages.
Oddly, Chrome doesn't have this, above.
The "Seach Providers" I use:
Jeff-Relf.Me/SearchPlugins.PNG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 02:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 60 search providers pre-installed across more than 90 languages. |
| Message-ID | <1d07cf3e-a229-4462-b579-e52ee363ee30@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448630 |
On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 1:24:58 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > Google poured billions of dollars into FireFox. > > > > I thought they stopped in 2014 (a lot has happened to FF since then) > > when they went with the Yahoo deal? > > WikiPedia says: > > On December 20, 2011, Mozilla announced that the > contract [ with Google ] was once again renewed for > at least three years to November 2014, at three times > the amount previously paid, or nearly US$300 million annually. > > WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Mozilla_Foundation#Financing > > Nov 2017 "Blog.Mozilla.ORG" wrote: > > Google will also become our new default search > provider in the United States, Canada, Hong Kong and Taiwan. > > Firefox default search providers in other regions are > Yandex in Russia, Turkey, Belarus and Kazakhstan; > Baidu in China; and Google in the rest of the world. > > Firefox has more choice in search providers than any > other browser with more than 60 search providers > pre-installed across more than 90 languages. > > Oddly, Chrome doesn't have this, above. > The "Seach Providers" I use: > > Jeff-Relf.Me/SearchPlugins.PNG You used it and did extensive testing and your "intuitions" lead you to that assumption, so what? By getting an education from 'experts' like that you get terms like 'communism'. Carried to its (im)moral intent, the insistence that it's 'immoral' for a heterosexual dude to not wish to screw a dead body is established. Audra Moore is the effect of the truth that Leninists have been instructed to take the lead in instructing kids. It is not mere happenstance that he is a mindless Democrat. Lots of morons are now babbling about the Unity "CLI" as if that actually could happen. This is something you should ask Jessica Lane. Was that meant to be clever? Audra Moore loves that Jessica Lane is on the other end. Imagine if Audra Moore walked up to a cow and delivered the punch line. It wouldn't be amusing in any way. -- Do not click this link!! http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_h2o1be_peepshow Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 18:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <a0z8b03g.bio@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #448593 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >> -hh wrote: >> >> > chrisv wrote: >> >> >> -hh wrote: >> >> >> >> >To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" >> >> >utilities. >> >> >> >> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? >> > >> >It misses on the "shine" requirement. >> >> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. > > Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? > Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure > instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? > Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version of Mack is UNIX certified.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 15:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fk1sstFk4pbU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #448675 |
On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: > -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >>> -hh wrote: >>> >>>> chrisv wrote: >>> >>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" >>>>>> utilities. >>>>> >>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? >>>> >>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. >>> >>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. >> >> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? >> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure >> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? >> > > Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version > of Mack is UNIX certified. > Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 00:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7nQCC.381694$By2.211927@fx30.am4> |
| In reply to | #448692 |
On 2018-04-21, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >> -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >>>> -hh wrote: >>>> >>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" >>>>>>> utilities. >>>>>> >>>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? >>>>> >>>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. >>>> >>>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. >>> >>> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? >>> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure >>> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? >>> >> >> Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version >> of Mack is UNIX certified. >> > Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for > UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. Figures? > -- press any key to continue or any other to quit...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 08:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fk3n0cF1ltpU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #448703 |
On 4/21/18, 5:07 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > On 2018-04-21,Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> > On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >>> >> -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>> >>> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>> -hh wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> utilities. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? >>>> >>> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure >>>> >>> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? >>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version >>> >> of Mack is UNIX certified. >>> >> >> > Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for >> > UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. > Figures? Any usage stats... macOS is more popular on the desktop than are ALL Linux-based OSs *combined*. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 16:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sz9b08083qg.h@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #448742 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/21/18, 5:07 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >> On 2018-04-21,Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> > On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >>>> >> -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>> >>> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >>>>>> >>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> utilities. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? >>>>> >>> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure >>>>> >>> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? >>>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version >>>> >> of Mack is UNIX certified. >>>> >> >>> > Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for >>> > UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. >> Figures? > > Any usage stats... macOS is more popular on the desktop than are ALL > Linux-based OSs *combined*. > Mack comes pre-installed on shiny gadgets masquerading as computers. The vast majority of desktop Linux systems were installed on bare metal by discriminating, technologically inclined UNIX geeks. These top-tier users *chose* the OS, and their choice was Linux. Nobody chooses Mack.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 09:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fk3rnoF2ptaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #448755 |
On 4/22/18, 9:15 AM, owl wrote: > Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 4/21/18, 5:07 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> On 2018-04-21,Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utilities. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? >>>>>>>>> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure >>>>>>>>> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version >>>>>>> of Mack is UNIX certified. >>>>>>> >>>>> Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for >>>>> UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. >>> Figures? >> >> Any usage stats... macOS is more popular on the desktop than are ALL >> Linux-based OSs *combined*. >> > > Mack comes pre-installed on shiny gadgets masquerading as computers. > The vast majority of desktop Linux systems were installed on bare metal > by discriminating, technologically inclined UNIX geeks. These top-tier > users *chose* the OS, and their choice was Linux. Nobody chooses Mack. > Some people choose macOS. Some people choose any of the many Linux distros. Both are choices. You are in one of those groups and like to see yourself as better than others. Fair enough... but why make this about you and your ego? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 16:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sz8b08308a.ah9o3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #448758 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/22/18, 9:15 AM, owl wrote: >> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 4/21/18, 5:07 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>> On 2018-04-21,Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utilities. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? >>>>>>>>>> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure >>>>>>>>>> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version >>>>>>>> of Mack is UNIX certified. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for >>>>>> UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. >>>> Figures? >>> >>> Any usage stats... macOS is more popular on the desktop than are ALL >>> Linux-based OSs *combined*. >>> >> >> Mack comes pre-installed on shiny gadgets masquerading as computers. >> The vast majority of desktop Linux systems were installed on bare metal >> by discriminating, technologically inclined UNIX geeks. These top-tier >> users *chose* the OS, and their choice was Linux. Nobody chooses Mack. >> > Some people choose macOS. Some people choose any of the many Linux distros. > Some people choose the Apple badge, you mean. Mack OS just comes with it. Nobody chooses Mack Os. > Both are choices. > > You are in one of those groups and like to see yourself as better than > others. Fair enough... but why make this about you and your ego? > Just because you are feeling inferior, that does not make it about my ego.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 10:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fk3tcqF35m7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #448761 |
On 4/22/18, 9:47 AM, owl wrote: > Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 4/22/18, 9:15 AM, owl wrote: >>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/21/18, 5:07 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>> On 2018-04-21,Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utilities. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? >>>>>>>>>>> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure >>>>>>>>>>> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version >>>>>>>>> of Mack is UNIX certified. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for >>>>>>> UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. >>>>> Figures? >>>> >>>> Any usage stats... macOS is more popular on the desktop than are ALL >>>> Linux-based OSs *combined*. >>>> >>> >>> Mack comes pre-installed on shiny gadgets masquerading as computers. >>> The vast majority of desktop Linux systems were installed on bare metal >>> by discriminating, technologically inclined UNIX geeks. These top-tier >>> users *chose* the OS, and their choice was Linux. Nobody chooses Mack. >>> >> Some people choose macOS. Some people choose any of the many Linux distros. >> > > Some people choose the Apple badge, you mean. Mack OS just comes with it. > Nobody chooses Mack Os. >> Both are choices. >> >> You are in one of those groups and like to see yourself as better than >> others. Fair enough... but why make this about you and your ego? >> > > Just because you are feeling inferior, that does not make it about > my ego. > As I noted: some people choose macOS, others choose various forms of Linux. Clearly, as you demonstrate above, this bothers you. It does not bother me (and, in fact, I choose to use both). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 10:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a4998a16-9d64-4097-84e6-686db6e04d93@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448761 |
On Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 10:47:28 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 4/22/18, 9:15 AM, owl wrote: > >> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>> On 4/21/18, 5:07 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > >>>> On 2018-04-21,Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: > >>>>>>>> -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utilities. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? > >>>>>>>>>> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure > >>>>>>>>>> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version > >>>>>>>> of Mack is UNIX certified. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for > >>>>>> UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. > >>>> Figures? > >>> > >>> Any usage stats... macOS is more popular on the desktop than are ALL > >>> Linux-based OSs *combined*. > >>> > >> > >> Mack comes pre-installed on shiny gadgets masquerading as computers. > >> The vast majority of desktop Linux systems were installed on bare metal > >> by discriminating, technologically inclined UNIX geeks. These top-tier > >> users *chose* the OS, and their choice was Linux. Nobody chooses Mack. > >> > > Some people choose macOS. Some people choose any of the many Linux distros. > > > > Some people choose the Apple badge, you mean. Mack OS just comes with it. > Nobody chooses Mack Os. There are people who do and many of them are software developers. The reason they do, though, is often based on the CLI, a thing that Linux is better at in my opinion (especially updates). That I've seen it looks like they also prefer the Mac because they believe they don't have to mess with it as much as they would Linux, a thing that isn't particularly true wrt to what they're doing in the CLI for their job.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fk425vF48anU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #448765 |
On 4/22/18, 10:44 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 10:47:28 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 4/22/18, 9:15 AM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 4/21/18, 5:07 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-04-21,Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utilities. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? >>>>>>>>>>>> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure >>>>>>>>>>>> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version >>>>>>>>>> of Mack is UNIX certified. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for >>>>>>>> UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. >>>>>> Figures? >>>>> >>>>> Any usage stats... macOS is more popular on the desktop than are ALL >>>>> Linux-based OSs *combined*. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Mack comes pre-installed on shiny gadgets masquerading as computers. >>>> The vast majority of desktop Linux systems were installed on bare metal >>>> by discriminating, technologically inclined UNIX geeks. These top-tier >>>> users *chose* the OS, and their choice was Linux. Nobody chooses Mack. >>>> >>> Some people choose macOS. Some people choose any of the many Linux distros. >>> >> >> Some people choose the Apple badge, you mean. Mack OS just comes with it. >> Nobody chooses Mack Os. > > There are people who do and many of them are software developers. Many. OK, sure. But most... no. Why focus on the pretty small exception of users (most users are NOT developers)? > The reason they do, though, is often based on the CLI, a thing that > Linux is better at in my opinion (especially updates). That I've seen > it looks like they also prefer the Mac because they believe they don't > have to mess with it as much as they would Linux, a thing that isn't > particularly true wrt to what they're doing in the CLI for their job. Most macOS users rarely if ever touch the CLI. Look up videos on how to use macOS... on YouTube or Apple's site and you will see only a tiny percentage focus on the GUI. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 11:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d7e796bf-5f25-4450-aebe-bbd334628ebe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448770 |
On Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 12:21:54 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 4/22/18, 10:44 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 10:47:28 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: (snip) > >> Some people choose the Apple badge, you mean. Mack OS just comes with it. > >> Nobody chooses Mack Os. > > > > There are people who do and many of them are software developers. > > Many. OK, sure. But most... no. Other than you, who said "most", Mr. Pathological Liar? > Why focus on the pretty small exception > of users (most users are NOT developers)? Because that's where my interest is and... I felt like it. By the way, what I felt like sufficiently challenged the idea "Nobody chooses Mack Os"; feel free to challenge it your way instead of trying to dictate mine. > > The reason they do, though, is often based on the CLI, a thing that > > Linux is better at in my opinion (especially updates). That I've seen > > it looks like they also prefer the Mac because they believe they don't > > have to mess with it as much as they would Linux, a thing that isn't > > particularly true wrt to what they're doing in the CLI for their job. > > Most macOS users rarely if ever touch the CLI. Look up videos on how to > use macOS... on YouTube or Apple's site and you will see only a tiny > percentage focus on the GUI. Are you trying to undermine the point you're trying to make or is this just another 'coming down off drugs' day?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 17:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d0463688-7147-4156-bb70-bc8f9f13a9fe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448692 |
On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 3:39:29 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 4/21/18, 11:03 AM, owl wrote: > > -hh<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > >> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: > >>> -hh wrote: > >>> > >>>> chrisv wrote: > >>> > >>>>> -hh wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> To be fair, where FOSS does shine is in the small "labor of love" > >>>>>> utilities. > >>>>> > >>>>> Small "labor of love" like the Linux kernel? > >>>> > >>>> It misses on the "shine" requirement. > >>> > >>> It's better than the Mac kernel. Idiot. > >> > >> Oh, so you're claiming that its also been regularly UNIX(tm) certified? > >> Or did you have something else in mind that's an objective measure > >> instead of just making YA stupidly unsubstantiated claim? > >> > > > > Currently two versions of Linux are UNIX certified, while only one version > > of Mack is UNIX certified. > > > Currently MacOS is the most popular UNIX in the world. Even for > UNIX-like systems, MacOS is the most popular on the desktop. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Thanks to Melzzzzz and his 'buddies' you now need a recognized list (which I set up for NewsLeecher and Opera Mail). Dig through the archives, for the most part I lately stopped giving him what he earned. If people start up with him again I will slip in my resolve... as that is just my way. I'm referring to our clan here, not drive by loons, who never do as we want anyway. I guess this is what arises when deeply low self-respect takes over Melzzzzz's life. You can say I am the Pope for all I care. Lines of text containing tells. -- Eight things to never feed your dog http://www.5z8.info/-php-deactivate_phishing_filter-48-_e3m8dt_malicious-cookie Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web