Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #468142 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-22 09:36 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 618 — 38 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
somebody running Snit over in a rental pickup truck from Lowes would be viewed as solid community service Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 08:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 10:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 15:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 07:47 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:24 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 05:55 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:00 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 05:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
All educated people agree that Snit is the very definition of insanity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 05:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:10 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:48 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 05:39 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:50 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
"Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-30 07:13 -0700
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-30 20:14 -0700
Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:58 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 04:14 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:28 -0500
Mr. ChrisV, my publicist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 07:27 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:13 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:06 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:08 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:15 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:20 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:45 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:50 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:59 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:10 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:22 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:05 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 22:58 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:02 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:00 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:17 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:23 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:52 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:04 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:28 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 13:54 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:55 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:12 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:45 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 18:12 -0700
Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:55 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 12:07 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:35 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:38 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:58 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:07 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:15 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:15 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:51 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 22:57 +0000
Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:57 -0700
Re: Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 07:42 -0700
Re: Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 07:52 -0700
Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 13:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:39 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:23 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:47 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:46 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 16:05 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:41 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 13:47 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:53 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:07 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:10 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:29 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:43 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:04 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 17:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:43 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 10:03 -0500
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 17:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 02:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 04:13 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 03:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 04:45 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:27 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
Re: The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:34 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 07:21 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:48 -0700
Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 21:44 -0700
Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:03 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:42 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 21:22 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
"IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:19 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 03:38 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 10:54 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:37 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:55 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:51 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
Democratic Socialists are Tards ... Just thought that the COLA Fruits might want to know Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:59 -0700
Re: Democratic Socialists are Tards ... Just thought that the COLA Fruits might want to know Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:17 -0700
Second verse, same as the first ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:26 -0700
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 09:50 -0400
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:38 +0000
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 08:02 -0700
Second verse, same as the first ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 09:20 -0700
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 09:36 -0700
Page 6 of 31 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 31 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pob19e$crd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #468598 |
On 9/24/2018 9:57 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/24/18 5:35 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: >> >>> benj wrote: >>> >>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> kkensington01 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for >>>>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the >>>>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>>> >>>>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>>> >>>>> Let me guess:Â You're a stupid right-winger. >>>> >>>> Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are >>>> put in >>>> charge of it this time? >>> >>> YA stupid right-winger. >>> >>>> I think that's called insane. >>> >>> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? >> >> As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour of >> corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the >> views of conservative individuals? > > I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of > service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of > Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was > warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. > > NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what > political side you are on. bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? Harvard, UTexas and others > >> Similarly, are you in favour of >> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >> doing business? > > They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not > obligated to enable him to cause harm. > > You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor > does Alex Jones. > Jones is entertainment dude, not news,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g0sigtFrp5aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #468608 |
On 9/24/18 8:52 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/24/2018 9:57 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/24/18 5:35 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>> >>>> benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> kkensington01 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for >>>>>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the >>>>>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me guess:Â You're a stupid right-winger. >>>>> >>>>> Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are >>>>> put in >>>>> charge of it this time? >>>> >>>> YA stupid right-winger. >>>> >>>>> I think that's called insane. >>>> >>>> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? >>> >>> As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour of >>> corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the >>> views of conservative individuals? >> >> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was >> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >> >> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >> political side you are on. > > bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). > Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? > Harvard, UTexas and others While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. >>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >>> doing business? >> >> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >> >> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >> does Alex Jones. >> > Jones is entertainment dude, not news, The news is entertainment these days... but either way, NOBODY is obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pobaum$v9e$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #468617 |
On 9/24/2018 11:43 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/24/18 8:52 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 9/24/2018 9:57 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 9/24/18 5:35 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> benj wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> kkensington01 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and >>>>>>>>> rob the >>>>>>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let me guess:Â You're a stupid right-winger. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are >>>>>> put in >>>>>> charge of it this time? >>>>> >>>>> YA stupid right-winger. >>>>> >>>>>> I think that's called insane. >>>>> >>>>> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? >>>> >>>> As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in >>>> favour of >>>> corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the >>>> views of conservative individuals? >>> >>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was >>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>> >>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>> political side you are on. >> >> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? > > Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such > bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not > relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? Facebook? They need to be regulated. > >> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? >> Harvard, UTexas and others > > While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a > BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the > discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. no, it is not. those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you are out, if black you are in. That is clear institutionalized bigotry. > >>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >>>> doing business? >>> >>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>> >>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>> does Alex Jones. >>> >> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, > > The news is entertainment these days... agree, only way they can get make a profit. but either way, NOBODY is > obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. CNN hatred of Trump ? left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? Hillary's hatred of Men ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 12:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9d145038-1107-4383-8083-360eb9e3e342@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468632 |
On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 11:38:18 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > On 9/24/2018 11:43 AM, Snit wrote: > > On 9/24/18 8:52 AM, Sergio wrote: > >> On 9/24/2018 9:57 AM, Snit wrote: > >>> On 9/24/18 5:35 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> benj wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> chrisv wrote: > >>>>>>> Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>>> kkensington01 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries > >>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and > >>>>>>>>> rob the > >>>>>>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Let me guess:Â You're a stupid right-winger. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are > >>>>>> put in > >>>>>> charge of it this time? > >>>>> > >>>>> YA stupid right-winger. > >>>>> > >>>>>> I think that's called insane. > >>>>> > >>>>> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? > >>>> > >>>> As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in > >>>> favour of > >>>> corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the > >>>> views of conservative individuals? > >>> > >>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of > >>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of > >>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was > >>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. > >>> > >>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what > >>> political side you are on. > >> > >> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? > > > > Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such > > bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not > > relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). > > who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? > Facebook? They need to be regulated. > > > > > >> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? > >> Harvard, UTexas and others > > > > While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a > > BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the > > discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. > > no, it is not. > those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you > are out, if black you are in. > > That is clear institutionalized bigotry. > > > > >>>> Similarly, are you in favour of > >>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from > >>>> doing business? > >>> > >>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not > >>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. > >>> > >>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor > >>> does Alex Jones. > >>> > >> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, > > > > The news is entertainment these days... > > agree, only way they can get make a profit. > > > but either way, NOBODY is > > obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. > > CNN hatred of Trump ? > left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? > > Hillary's hatred of Men ? After deleting all the nyms, it's primarily just Snit Glasser producing the preponderance of the trolling. Yes. And both altogether disturbed screwballs. The person you are referencing is in my kill file. Lots of morons are now talking about the GNU/Linux "CLI" as if it truly would be a good thing. Snit Glasser showed himself to be a hypocrite by having the pretense to not engage Klaus Schadenfreude through loudly shouting 'goodbye forever!' and then assaulting him anyhow via piggybacking. Snit Glasser can take pleasure in the view in the overflowing garbage dump of my killfile. Klaus Schadenfreude just wiped the floor with Snit Glasser. Besides Snit Glasser, who fails to understand what Klaus Schadenfreude is doing? -- Get Rich Slow https://redd.it/6sfhq6 http://www.5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_g0w7hf_molotovcocktail Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g0ss3bFtoi7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #468632 |
On 9/24/18 11:37 AM, Sergio wrote: ... >>>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was >>>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>>> >>>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>>> political side you are on. >>> >>> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? >> >> Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such >> bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not >> relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). > > who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? > Facebook? They need to be regulated. They each decide what they carry. Now if they are doing so in a discriminatory way this can be problematic, but that does not seem to apply here. >>> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? >>> Harvard, UTexas and others >> >> While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a >> BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the >> discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. > > no, it is not. > those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you > are out, if black you are in. > > That is clear institutionalized bigotry. From a very naive and surface view I can see why you would think so. Please note I talked about the balancing factor... it is not as if I ignored the deeper issues. But, again, note I am against affirmative action. I can understand why it is done but I do not approve of it. >>>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >>>>> doing business? >>>> >>>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>>> >>>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>>> does Alex Jones. >>>> >>> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, >> >> The news is entertainment these days... > > agree, only way they can get make a profit. With Google you are the product. Same with the news. > but either way, NOBODY is >> obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. > > CNN hatred of Trump ? > left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? If you have examples I am open to them. And if Apple or Google or Twitter wanted to boot them FOR repeated bigoted attacks or the like I would have no issue with that. But, again, this does not seem to apply. > Hillary's hatred of Men ? He campaign *did* include some sexist messages and I strongly oppose those. If Twitter, Apple, Google and the like had warned her repeatedly to stop and if she refused, and if her attacks were as extreme as those of Alex Jones against blacks and Muslims and others then I would back them kicking her off. Remember: I am not picking left vs. right, to me this is about equal rights over special entitlements. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk83pt.t5m.17.22@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #468638 |
On 2018-09-24 12:26 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/24/18 11:37 AM, Sergio wrote: > ... >>>>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>>>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>>>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules >>>>> and was >>>>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>>>> >>>>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>>>> political side you are on. >>>> >>>> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? >>> >>> Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such >>> bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not >>> relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). >> >> who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? >> Facebook?  They need to be regulated. > > They each decide what they carry. Now if they are doing so in a > discriminatory way this can be problematic, but that does not seem to > apply here. > >>>> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their >>>> skin ? >>>> Harvard, UTexas and others >>> >>> While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a >>> BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the >>> discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. >> >> no, it is not. >> those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you >> are out, if black you are in. >> >> That is clear institutionalized bigotry. > > From a very naive and surface view I can see why you would think so. > Please note I talked about the balancing factor... it is not as if I > ignored the deeper issues. > > But, again, note I am against affirmative action. I can understand why > it is done but I do not approve of it. > >>>>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones >>>>>> from >>>>>> doing business? >>>>> >>>>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>>>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>>>> >>>>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>>>> does Alex Jones. >>>>> >>>> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, >>> >>> The news is entertainment these days... >> >> agree, only way they can get make a profit. > > With Google you are the product. Same with the news. > >>  but either way, NOBODY is >>> obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. >> >> CNN hatred of Trump ? >> left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? > > If you have examples I am open to them. And if Apple or Google or > Twitter wanted to boot them FOR repeated bigoted attacks or the like I > would have no issue with that. But, again, this does not seem to apply. > >> Hillary's hatred of Men ? > > He campaign *did* include some sexist messages and I strongly oppose > those. If Twitter, Apple, Google and the like had warned her repeatedly > to stop and if she refused, and if her attacks were as extreme as those > of Alex Jones against blacks and Muslims and others then I would back > them kicking her off. > > Remember: I am not picking left vs. right, to me this is about equal > rights over special entitlements. > > hey its snit , what's happening snit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 12:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <19594c58-ed91-45f9-8917-132c06e9f2a6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468638 |
On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 12:26:39 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 9/24/18 11:37 AM, Sergio wrote: > ... > >>>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of > >>>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of > >>>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was > >>>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. > >>>> > >>>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what > >>>> political side you are on. > >>> > >>> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? > >> > >> Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such > >> bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not > >> relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). > > > > who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? > > Facebook? They need to be regulated. > > They each decide what they carry. Now if they are doing so in a > discriminatory way this can be problematic, but that does not seem to > apply here. > > >>> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? > >>> Harvard, UTexas and others > >> > >> While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a > >> BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the > >> discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. > > > > no, it is not. > > those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you > > are out, if black you are in. > > > > That is clear institutionalized bigotry. > > From a very naive and surface view I can see why you would think so. > Please note I talked about the balancing factor... it is not as if I > ignored the deeper issues. > > But, again, note I am against affirmative action. I can understand why > it is done but I do not approve of it. > > >>>>> Similarly, are you in favour of > >>>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from > >>>>> doing business? > >>>> > >>>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not > >>>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. > >>>> > >>>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor > >>>> does Alex Jones. > >>>> > >>> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, > >> > >> The news is entertainment these days... > > > > agree, only way they can get make a profit. > > With Google you are the product. Same with the news. > > > but either way, NOBODY is > >> obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. > > > > CNN hatred of Trump ? > > left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? > > If you have examples I am open to them. And if Apple or Google or > Twitter wanted to boot them FOR repeated bigoted attacks or the like I > would have no issue with that. But, again, this does not seem to apply. > > > Hillary's hatred of Men ? > > He campaign *did* include some sexist messages and I strongly oppose > those. If Twitter, Apple, Google and the like had warned her repeatedly > to stop and if she refused, and if her attacks were as extreme as those > of Alex Jones against blacks and Muslims and others then I would back > them kicking her off. > > Remember: I am not picking left vs. right, to me this is about equal > rights over special entitlements. > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> HA! How did Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh get SO conceited he believes everything is about his trolling?? What is your evidence? I don't accept that. Shallowness is shallowness and there are tons who are okay with it. Several are even lawyers. By getting an education from 'media talking heads' like that you get laws like 'liberalism'. Carried to its (ir)rational resolution, the idea that it's 'immoral' for a heterosexual dude to not wish to identify as a gay man is born. I am well aware the evidence I link to from this group is merely novice level; that said, it serves its purpose. Why would you want to restrict all scripts on GNU/Linux to what can be done on Windows and macOS? Who does NOT know that this kind of hooey is Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh's modus operandi, not the MO of Klaus Schadenfreude? It is all just nonsense... the flooding, the posting with Klaus Schadenfreude's name, the writing of word-twisted nonsense, the anger... the false bravado and eagerness to show how flustered he is over being booted from the playground for pissing in it again... just what Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh does ;) Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh only thinks about Klaus Schadenfreude, Klaus Schadenfreude, Klaus Schadenfreude! -- This Trick Gets Women Hot For You! http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_j3m3lg_whitepower http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything http://www.5z8.info/lemon-party-redux_v1o7pm_nakedgrandmas.jpg Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pobn41$1jf5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #468638 |
On 9/24/2018 2:26 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/24/18 11:37 AM, Sergio wrote: > ... >>>>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>>>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>>>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules >>>>> and was >>>>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>>>> >>>>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>>>> political side you are on. >>>> >>>> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? >>> >>> Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such >>> bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not >>> relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). >> >> who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? >> Facebook?  They need to be regulated. > > They each decide what they carry. Now if they are doing so in a > discriminatory way this can be problematic, but that does not seem to > apply here. yes, it obviously does and is. Congress has hauled them up to testify several times now, and the DOJ is getting involved. you should know this. > >>>> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their >>>> skin ? >>>> Harvard, UTexas and others >>> >>> While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a >>> BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the >>> discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. >> >> no, it is not. >> those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you >> are out, if black you are in. >> >> That is clear institutionalized bigotry. > > From a very naive and surface view I can see why you would think so. try not to be naive and shallow. If a college rejects you because of the *color of your skin*, that is institutionalized bigotry. > Please note I talked about the balancing factor... it is not as if I > ignored the deeper issues. 'balancing factor' is simply an excuse to continue institutionalized Racism, to meet a numbers goal for statisticians. > > But, again, note I am against affirmative action. I can understand why > it is done but I do not approve of it. I reject it, it is racism, pure and simple. > >>>>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones >>>>>> from >>>>>> doing business? >>>>> >>>>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>>>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>>>> >>>>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>>>> does Alex Jones. >>>>> >>>> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, >>> >>> The news is entertainment these days... >> >> agree, only way they can get make a profit. > > With Google you are the product. Same with the news. Google is worse than we thought. note that a majority of web pages have a line of java script back to Google. Google is worse than we think, they update their database with our IP, time, date, what webpage, and duration. Facebook has a lot out there, and Twitter has many too [I use NoScript, and it shows the JS as it blocks it, no google JS is needed to run the page] > >>  but either way, NOBODY is >>> obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. >> >> CNN hatred of Trump ? >> left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? > > If you have examples I am open to them. And if Apple or Google or > Twitter wanted to boot them FOR repeated bigoted attacks or the like I > would have no issue with that. But, again, this does not seem to apply. > >> Hillary's hatred of Men ? > > He campaign *did* include some sexist messages and I strongly oppose > those. If Twitter, Apple, Google and the like had warned her repeatedly > to stop and if she refused, and if her attacks were as extreme as those > of Alex Jones against blacks and Muslims and others then I would back > them kicking her off. usa media has a lot more blatent bias than many countries, I think that is because our media follows british media. (to capture reader interest) but then other countries have only one sided media (Saudi Arabia) > > Remember: I am not picking left vs. right, to me this is about equal > rights over special entitlements. its a complex problem with the new distribution channels, unregulated, Google, FB, Tweeter, etc, where the little guys can put out content. Google, FB, Tweeter can each choose the 'truth', but they should be open channels, Alex Jones was fun, until he got onto Sandy Hook. Then he got canned, like other anouncers on national networks. Alex Jones vs CNN vs Al Jazeera, Our news organizations had to change their business models to survive and take money from the guys that generate the news content, Dems pay CNN, Repugs pay Fox... Well I know for a fact USA lives in a tight information bubble constrained by USA, that excludes most of the rest of the world. Can't fix that. However, Another way to look at it is as if it was a large libarary, and you can checkout any books you want too, any content matter. even Mien Kaumpt. and the libarian gets to choose the subjects of your books.... Or let the reader figure it out. But now with online channels, FB, Google, etc, who decides what our kids read or get exposed to (if they are playing online games)?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g0tc9rF2c7dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #468663 |
On 9/24/18 3:05 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/24/2018 2:26 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/24/18 11:37 AM, Sergio wrote: >> ... >>>>>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>>>>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>>>>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules >>>>>> and was >>>>>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>>>>> >>>>>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>>>>> political side you are on. >>>>> >>>>> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? >>>> >>>> Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such >>>> bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not >>>> relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). >>> >>> who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? >>> Facebook?  They need to be regulated. >> >> They each decide what they carry. Now if they are doing so in a >> discriminatory way this can be problematic, but that does not seem to >> apply here. > > yes, it obviously does and is. > Congress has hauled them up to testify several times now, and the DOJ is > getting involved. > you should know this. By all means show where they are blocking content in a discriminatory way. >>>>> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their >>>>> skin ? >>>>> Harvard, UTexas and others >>>> >>>> While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a >>>> BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the >>>> discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. >>> >>> no, it is not. >>> those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you >>> are out, if black you are in. >>> >>> That is clear institutionalized bigotry. >> >> From a very naive and surface view I can see why you would think so. > > try not to be naive and shallow. As I am noting, I am not -- I see the deeper issues which explain why affirmative action (balancing AGAINST known biases) is not the same as promoting those known biases, even if on a simple surface view it might appear the same to some. Are you able to see why a balancing response is not the same as the thing being balanced? > If a college rejects you because of the *color of your skin*, that is > institutionalized bigotry. Again, if you ignore the elephant in the room of balancing against known bias vs. backing that known bias I can see where you would reach that conclusion. I, however, do not ignore that elephant in the room. >> Please note I talked about the balancing factor... it is not as if I >> ignored the deeper issues. > > 'balancing factor' is simply an excuse to continue institutionalized > Racism, to meet a numbers goal for statisticians. Apparently you do not see the difference between backing known bias and balancing against it. Fair enough. Not much I can do to help you. >> But, again, note I am against affirmative action. I can understand why >> it is done but I do not approve of it. > > I reject it, it is racism, pure and simple. When you look at it from a very simplistic view and ignore the balancing factor I can see why you would think so. Sure. >>>>>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>>>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> doing business? >>>>>> >>>>>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>>>>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>>>>> >>>>>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>>>>> does Alex Jones. >>>>>> >>>>> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, >>>> >>>> The news is entertainment these days... >>> >>> agree, only way they can get make a profit. >> >> With Google you are the product. Same with the news. > > Google is worse than we thought. note that a majority of web pages have > a line of java script back to Google. Google is worse than we think, > they update their database with our IP, time, date, what webpage, and > duration. Facebook has a lot out there, and Twitter has many too [I use > NoScript, and it shows the JS as it blocks it, no google JS is needed to > run the page] One of the things I am happy about with the new Safari is it helps to block SOME of that. But, sure, Google does a lot of evil things (as do the others, including Apple... though I would say Google is in a class of their own). >>>  but either way, NOBODY is >>>> obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. >>> >>> CNN hatred of Trump ? >>> left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? >> >> If you have examples I am open to them. And if Apple or Google or >> Twitter wanted to boot them FOR repeated bigoted attacks or the like I >> would have no issue with that. But, again, this does not seem to apply. >> >>> Hillary's hatred of Men ? >> >> He campaign *did* include some sexist messages and I strongly oppose >> those. If Twitter, Apple, Google and the like had warned her repeatedly >> to stop and if she refused, and if her attacks were as extreme as those >> of Alex Jones against blacks and Muslims and others then I would back >> them kicking her off. > > usa media has a lot more blatent bias than many countries, I think that > is because our media follows british media. (to capture reader interest) > but then other countries have only one sided media (Saudi Arabia) The US certainly has biases... they push what will sell and they push right wing ideas about the wealthy being somehow better morally and being poor being a moral weakness. They rarely show the harm done by big corporations (Google, Apple, MS, Disney, whomever). They do not focus on the big economic issue of income inequality and wealth redistribution to the very rich. I would love to see them move more toward the center and not be so far to the right. >> Remember: I am not picking left vs. right, to me this is about equal >> rights over special entitlements. > > its a complex problem with the new distribution channels, unregulated, > Google, FB, Tweeter, etc, where the little guys can put out content. > Google, FB, Tweeter can each choose the 'truth', but they should be open > channels, Alex Jones was fun, until he got onto Sandy Hook. Then he got > canned, like other anouncers on national networks. I am fine with not enabling his version of hatred and conspiracy theories... and with holding him accountable to the harm he does. But he should (and does) have a right to speech. > Alex Jones vs CNN vs Al Jazeera, > Our news organizations had to change their business models to survive > and take money from the guys that generate the news content, Dems pay > CNN, Repugs pay Fox... CNN is pretty bad... MSNBC is worse... FOX is still worse than either (by far). I am not defending the MSM as being good. > Well I know for a fact USA lives in a tight information bubble > constrained by USA, that excludes most of the rest of the world. Can't > fix that. Ironically, one way to help get around that is to use services like Google (or Apple) News. > However, Another way to look at it is as if it was a large libarary, and > you can checkout any books you want too, any content matter. even Mien > Kaumpt. > > and the libarian gets to choose the subjects of your books.... > > Or let the reader figure it out. > > But now with online channels, FB, Google, etc, who decides what our kids > read or get exposed to (if they are playing online games)? I am happy to not have my kids repeatedly exposed to "Whites Only" signs and the like. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pobgbv$mhp$31@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #468632 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:37:54 -0500, Sergio wrote: > who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? > Facebook? They need to be regulated. Hello, Sergio, we're here from the Party. We're going to need to see your Republican membership card. <snip, snip, snip, confetti> We can't allow you to keep that. Not after you suggested ... <sotto voce> regulating big businesses </sotto voce> ... that sort of heresy simply cannot be tolerated. You are hereby excommunicated for the cardinal sin of using the "R" word without preceding it with "de-" or a word like "dismantling". Now get the fuck out of our sight, apostate! -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk86e5.c42.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #468642 |
. vetoed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Ed-dnVIkavmNmzTGnZ2dnUU7-I_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #468581 |
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:35:17 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <9S4qD.118460$lM2.103829@fx39.iad>: >On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >>benj wrote: >>>chrisv wrote: >>>>Skeeter wrote: >>>>>kkensington01 >>>>>>Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are >>>>>>called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working >>>>>>poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>>And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>>Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger. >>>Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in >>>charge of it this time? >>YA stupid right-winger. >>>I think that's called insane. >>Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? > >As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour >of corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring >the views of conservative individuals? Similarly, are you in favour of >corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >doing business? they censor all sorts of stuff from all sorts of political stances. that most of the problems are potential legally-actionable threats of violence and racist foamy terroristic nonsense from conservatives seems to be a problem that you should take up with your conservative allies, and not with private corporations. private corporations aren't the government and aren't held to the constitution for their internal protocols. they can censor anything they please on their platform - especially if they might be sued for hosting or enabling hate speech and threats from degenerate low-lifes. alex jones is free to start his own corporation for disseminating his hate. (which obviously he already has) -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 08:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4f67af9e-dbba-4f67-b65e-e875cd2f4873@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468606 |
On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 8:43:19 AM UTC-7, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:35:17 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer > <silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance > and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <9S4qD.118460$lM2.103829@fx39.iad>: > > >On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: > > > >>benj wrote: > >>>chrisv wrote: > >>>>Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>kkensington01 > >>>>>>Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are > >>>>>>called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working > >>>>>>poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. > >>>>>And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. > >>>>Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger. > >>>Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in > >>>charge of it this time? > >>YA stupid right-winger. > >>>I think that's called insane. > >>Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? > > > >As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour > >of corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring > >the views of conservative individuals? Similarly, are you in favour of > >corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from > >doing business? > > they censor all sorts of stuff from all sorts of political stances. that most of the problems are potential legally-actionable threats of violence and racist foamy terroristic nonsense from conservatives seems to be a problem that you should take up with your conservative allies, and not with private corporations. private corporations aren't the government and aren't held to the constitution for their internal protocols. they can censor anything they please on their platform - especially if they might be sued for hosting or enabling hate speech and threats from degenerate low-lifes. > > alex jones is free to start his own corporation for disseminating his hate. (which obviously he already has) > > -- > THIS SPACE FOR RENT > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA > > "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this > seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, > and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an > end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell > everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized > country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become > like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) > > "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously > unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic > terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie > terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what > they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by > keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) > > - > > "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor > > - > > "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode > > - > > "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> > > - > > Golden Killfile, June 2005 > KOTM, November 2006 > Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 > Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 > Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 > Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 > Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 > Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 > Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 > Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 > Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 > AUK Mascot, September 2007 > Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Snit! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYY/GZAAoJELnOYK54exUCoY8P/A2to3G0OJrV4rFZqrfos0G+ Hlz52idYDsiO9KbYI9E2AaEhX5Jado6kJgDD31LTOnYSHrIuTi/LeywcjOL/FCy7 bEojPW3xtu/XWHHSKU1Grce80Q2PHuR+878JDbCjXgrFplNEVk8+kiv2+5RlYegG 7xEgm+/J8zvxVlPfyoHOO65AygYy/ykShdza+MAW6OFWaXFNOxExjRx3mCmWcu3b eyf0bxgzL4zAFCuPBAOXQ56vxO8AOuwk8F7mXLV2Vn2Q2OTcqrEYMjwQZ2q7wFSg khU6VkEs7aFJ6keLSCoZlFmnoymptflJw3h0O6bb9GK67JBV6Moh5rev6aJfqGuZ fo38FgD/eRVroAYSm3FSCcknNbUhdNLUO/JmCRtx62YQvZoyUqUL64YRGlJ+moAV ZnU6NfI4WeeQ5nuagTS+kKjj1qGxsUkXEUTFRJpv4zQcHnTKTyUl+38t3+Jke7ua NRtkWtIvgg9+JCsA1qHjDDP29hdR5v7KFFnRKBaVgV+/nrALANWybFJKYsqxpP95 LMd0pxvEy2ZlX9n3nkmMIn4iRX3dY795NgOzHGd1ZWtMS3BPu4QWFA/YS7Adb30Z yHClb/JJWGtTPvgVtPzHyNbPhF6+kgJ/KQ6YrqiX71ZNLZNqCze7z3nw6xjcWr9V soXbWlBBa6AX7lnolpK8 =hcV2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- One Smart Penny! https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU_evUKollmjeuJy5V5UMotPUs65Q7YM6 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/RSikBcWxBLo Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 05:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <444992db-138b-4d8a-af18-8cc2c44537eb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468579 |
On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 5:18:15 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > benj wrote: > > > chrisv wrote: > >> Skeeter wrote: > >>> kkensington01 > >>>> > >>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are > >>>> called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working > >>>> poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. > >>> > >>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. > >> > >> Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger. > > > >Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in > >charge of it this time? > > YA stupid right-winger. > > >I think that's called insane. > > Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? > > -- > "But with no barrier to entry, how are the bad (Linux distros) kept > out?" - "-hh", putting his ignorance on display What did you expect from the lying imbecile? That Flooder Steve Carroll jackass has nothing to waste but time. He has nothing else, especially not a job. Flooder Steve Carroll's reverse compiled Bash with (I'd guess) Pseudo-Context Free Grammar to automate posts which are hard to distinguish from those of one particular legit member. A shadow of false justification, projected quickly, at the wrong time. Now why the added need to produce a screencast via Bash in a web based system? No matter, Flooder Steve Carroll didn't define this as part of his, what would undoubtedly be, always growing 'requirements'. Klaus Schadenfreude created at least twenty virtual machines in the last year or so. I am sure he and the herd are proud. Klaus Schadenfreude and I often rope-a-dope a bonobo with my mind. Protected code is not enough to protect you. This forum is a cesspool. - Get Rich Slow! http://alt.conspiracy.narkive.com/QcWYJ4Px/the-mentally-ill-mark-s-bilk http://www.5z8.info/mercenary_w5v9dl_open.exe http://www.5z8.info/horse-slaughter_w8c4en_launchexe Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 14:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fc6ae859-fd99-4795-afbd-7a57b41caf95@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468197 |
On Friday, September 21, 2018 at 11:15:35 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> Skeeter wrote:
>
> > kkensington01
> >>
> >> >
> >> > And yet no conservative-controlled city in the world is a sanctuary for
> >> > criminals...
> >>
> >> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are
> >> called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working
> >> poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds.
> >
> >And kensi spins it completely out of control....again.
>
> Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger.
>
> --
> "There are actually plenty of Linux-only jobs available. Don't blame
> others because you elect to take convenience and money over the
> non-existant principals you claim to have. If you feel so strongly
> that Windows/Microsoft is so terrible and how Linux is so great and
> virtuous then quit whining about it and practice what you preach." -
> Ezekreep
And what did Jonas Eklundh have to say about this amazing support from new posters? Most of the time he would try to push Troll Killer Snit to believe they're long time lurkers who just happened to have knowledge of his trolling but no issue with it. Makes no sense. Now Troll Killer Snit on the other end of the phone doesn't matter. All that matters is Jonas Eklundh gets to deliver the attack. So how to respond? Don't respond to the post. Reason isn't part of sport and never was planned to be.
Wow! How did Jonas Eklundh get so vainglorious he thinks everything is about his comments?? So many morons are now talking about the GNU/Linux "environment" as if something like that seriously could happen.
Do you believe the bullshit Jonas Eklundh is posting? How long has this debate been going on? Just some names the stalker has used
"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo
It's Jonas Eklundh's problem but he blames Troll Killer Snit. Obviously he would rather blame Troll Killer Snit than face reality.
--
Top Ten Ways Jonas Eklundh Trolls
http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding
http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything
http://www.5z8.info/mydick_x6g9hr_nakedgrandmas.jpg
Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po491i$d3v$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #468197 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:33 -0500, chrisv wrote: > Skeeter wrote: > >> kkensington01 >>> >>> >>> > And yet no conservative-controlled city in the world is a sanctuary >>> > for criminals... >>> >>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for >>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the >>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >> >>And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. > > Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger. DING DING DING! Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner ... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36160253e9b0255b994c69@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #468176 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <po34in$2si$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 9/21/2018 11:53 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > And yet no conservative-controlled city in the world is a sanctuary for > > criminals... > > Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are > called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working > poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. > > To conservatives, *that* you are a criminal isn't the important thing. > It's *how* you commit your crimes, and who your victims are. If you > steal from a corporate chain store's cash register with a gun, or rape > some rich old lady in some alley at knife point, they want you in jail. > If you rob non-wealthy people with a pen while wearing a three-piece > suit and rape your female employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex > and maybe spiking their drinks, you're a "good old boy" and get invited > to be their golfing buddy at the country club. Doncha just HATE men? -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700 |
| Subject | I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.27--3.56am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #469015 |
> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex > > Doncha just HATE men? I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom. Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <OL6rD.272428$cw.831@fx39.am4> |
| In reply to | #469030 |
On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex >> >> Doncha just HATE men? > > I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best daddy in the world` ;) > > The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected > in its birth rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, > at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom. > Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be replaced with nation that has more then that.. -- press any key to continue or any other to quit...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <P67rD.65536$9O2.8023@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #469055 |
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: > On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >>> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex >>> >>> Doncha just HATE men? >> >> I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. > > I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best > daddy in the world` ;) > > >> The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate >> -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, >> at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom. >> Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG > At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be > replaced with nation that has more then that.. Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe soon if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given too much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself as well as any motivation one might have to fix it. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 31 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 31 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web