Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #689406 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-04-23 09:11 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-04-25 01:27 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 258 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-23 09:11 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 12:43 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-24 09:07 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 01:25 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-25 05:12 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 02:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-25 19:27 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-25 15:38 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-26 00:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-24 13:31 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-24 09:47 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 01:28 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-25 12:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-25 23:16 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-26 00:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 01:21 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 03:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-26 07:34 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 08:04 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-26 10:09 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-26 05:53 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-26 11:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 23:00 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 07:24 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:41 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:52 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:35 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 07:18 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:45 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 11:44 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-28 17:05 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-28 17:11 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 09:02 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 14:08 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 11:07 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:24 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-30 09:13 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 14:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-01 14:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-02 15:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 20:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-05-03 08:18 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 21:34 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 18:43 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 00:17 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 21:47 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 07:43 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 09:13 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 20:16 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-05-02 20:47 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 19:31 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 00:13 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 22:16 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 10:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 09:31 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-04 09:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 08:23 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-04 13:38 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 18:00 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-05 11:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-05 08:40 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-05-04 14:40 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-05-04 11:52 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-04 20:05 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 04:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-05-05 18:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 14:55 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 04:29 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-02 15:20 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 11:28 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 00:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 20:15 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 01:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 22:24 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 10:56 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-05-03 08:29 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 10:39 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-04 10:04 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 08:24 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-04 20:10 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 04:48 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-05 08:36 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-05 17:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-05 14:04 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-05 18:59 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-05 15:24 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-06 02:21 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-06 11:00 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 20:58 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-06 19:43 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-08 00:29 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-08 03:28 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-08 10:02 -0400
Linux again (was: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-05-07 04:18 +0000
Re: Linux again (was: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-07 00:56 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 07:13 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-06 08:04 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 20:43 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 06:54 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-05-07 17:30 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-05-08 07:06 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 06:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 06:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-06 11:02 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 19:36 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 04:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 08:16 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 21:23 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 19:45 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-04 02:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 07:37 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-30 18:17 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 14:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 13:52 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 22:49 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 22:57 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 07:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:47 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-04-27 09:12 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-28 01:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 11:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-04-28 08:37 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:48 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:49 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 11:45 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 07:31 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:51 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 07:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:45 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-28 17:42 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 18:51 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-29 02:26 +0000
Re: Evolution (was Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:54 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:56 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:59 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-10 01:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 07:27 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:14 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 14:01 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-10 01:05 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-26 08:15 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 23:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:46 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-27 07:41 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-27 14:30 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-28 02:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:33 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:45 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 08:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 07:35 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-27 14:41 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 07:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 11:40 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:25 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:49 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-28 18:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 20:01 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 16:47 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 06:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 09:23 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 14:21 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 11:24 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 21:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 17:33 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 22:14 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 19:37 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-30 00:25 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-30 00:30 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 18:22 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-30 01:39 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-30 08:53 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 13:54 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 13:28 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 00:09 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 21:45 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-02 15:31 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 11:41 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-30 09:07 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 21:03 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 22:56 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 19:48 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:13 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 22:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 03:49 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 22:49 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 19:45 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-03 05:27 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 08:18 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 08:14 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 04:41 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-29 15:26 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 08:56 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-29 16:10 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 09:48 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:10 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-30 09:05 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 14:24 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-05-01 17:04 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-05-01 11:01 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 19:18 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-01 23:30 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-02 16:01 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 18:47 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 23:26 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 01:09 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 03:56 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-03 05:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 10:45 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 07:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-04 08:39 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 04:44 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-05 06:24 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-30 18:20 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 14:01 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 23:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 19:55 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-03 05:32 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 08:23 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 01:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-03 05:36 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 04:14 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:26 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:48 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 19:58 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 16:46 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 06:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:38 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-29 00:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 17:20 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-29 01:27 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-29 02:52 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:29 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 08:13 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 02:57 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-04-24 18:54 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-24 20:35 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 14:04 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-24 17:26 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-24 21:45 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-24 21:48 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 14:57 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-24 21:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 14:58 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 01:29 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 01:27 +0000
Page 11 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 Next page →
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-04 08:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uSIRP.15841$f6Vd.6670@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #689946 |
On 2025-05-04 02:58, RonB wrote: > On 2025-05-03, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-05-03 01:27, RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-05-02, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-05-02 18:49, RonB wrote: >>> <snips> >>>>> >>>>> But this is not Gnome officially speaking. It's someone associated with >>>>> Gnome whining because Gnome got rid of someone that he apparently respected. >>>>> They guy who is attacking the Gnome Foundation is the one who wrote "Fuck >>>>> Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>>>> >>>>> And this blog is, apparently, so "influential" that there has been a total >>>>> of seven responses to this post. And the responses from other Gnome people >>>>> have not all been supportive. >>>>> >>>>> Was it really necessary to call right wing people nazis? does this kind >>>>> of talk benefit anyone? >>>>> >>>>> And... >>>>> >>>>> You lost me when you said “Fuck Nazis. GNOME is Antifa”. Tell me in what >>>>> way Antifa is any different to the Nazi Brownshirts in 1930’s Germany? I >>>>> think it would be more accurate to say: >>>>> >>>>> “Fuck Nazis. Antifa is Nazi”. >>>>> >>>>> I don't what the issue is here, or who Sonny is or why he was (apparently) >>>>> banned from Gnome, but this blogger (who, notice, is opposing Gnome here) is >>>>> the one who called Gnome Antifa. So, again, Lunduke is click baiting and >>>>> taking a quote out of context. This guy proves again that truth is not that >>>>> important to him. >>>> >>>> Like I said, it's not the first time that GNOME has been associated with >>>> leftist politics. This is just the latest edition. At this point, I'm >>>> glad to stay away from them. Besides, I actually prefer KDE. >>>> >>>> As of yet, I haven't yet of KDE having any kind of brain-dead Marxists >>>> pushing their garbage on the project. >>> >>> I don't doubt that Gnome can be linked to leftist politics, but that's a far >>> cry from insinuating "Gnome is Antifa" as if the Gnome Foundation is >>> officially endorsing these violent Antifa morons. >>> >>> This appears to be just more Lunduke lying by omission in order to create >>> click bait. I don't like dishonest bullshit like this. >> >> Well, it's not really clickbait in my case since I already have a >> lifetime subscription to his content. At this point, he doesn't make any >> more money from me. Either way, I'm happy that he's pointing out what's >> going on in the circles we don't automatically venture to. Without him >> pointing it out, I wouldn't have any idea how leftist Mozilla or GNOME >> are, and I wouldn't be aware of how much spying Firefox does by default. >> I don't see any real reason to dislike him. > > Reporting that there's a dispute on a Gnome blog about a pro-Antifa dink > would be one thing. Insinuating that "Gnome is Antifa" is another. I don't > like inaccurate headlines (I call them click bait.) Understood. I just don't believe that he's the only clown developing for GNOME. GNOME itself has/had a 5-year Diversity, Equity and Inclusion plan which left them broke, they believe in censoring anyone who posts a Lunduke link, it fired a board member without letting anyone know for two months, and they had a shaman with no knowledge of software whatsoever as their hear for nine months. That doesn't strike me as a software group which shares my values. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-05 04:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101ggbj.aov8.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689960 |
On 2025-05-04, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-05-04 02:58, RonB wrote: >> On 2025-05-03, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-05-03 01:27, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2025-05-02, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> On 2025-05-02 18:49, RonB wrote: >>>> <snips> >>>>>> >>>>>> But this is not Gnome officially speaking. It's someone associated with >>>>>> Gnome whining because Gnome got rid of someone that he apparently respected. >>>>>> They guy who is attacking the Gnome Foundation is the one who wrote "Fuck >>>>>> Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>>>>> >>>>>> And this blog is, apparently, so "influential" that there has been a total >>>>>> of seven responses to this post. And the responses from other Gnome people >>>>>> have not all been supportive. >>>>>> >>>>>> Was it really necessary to call right wing people nazis? does this kind >>>>>> of talk benefit anyone? >>>>>> >>>>>> And... >>>>>> >>>>>> You lost me when you said “Fuck Nazis. GNOME is Antifa”. Tell me in what >>>>>> way Antifa is any different to the Nazi Brownshirts in 1930’s Germany? I >>>>>> think it would be more accurate to say: >>>>>> >>>>>> “Fuck Nazis. Antifa is Nazi”. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't what the issue is here, or who Sonny is or why he was (apparently) >>>>>> banned from Gnome, but this blogger (who, notice, is opposing Gnome here) is >>>>>> the one who called Gnome Antifa. So, again, Lunduke is click baiting and >>>>>> taking a quote out of context. This guy proves again that truth is not that >>>>>> important to him. >>>>> >>>>> Like I said, it's not the first time that GNOME has been associated with >>>>> leftist politics. This is just the latest edition. At this point, I'm >>>>> glad to stay away from them. Besides, I actually prefer KDE. >>>>> >>>>> As of yet, I haven't yet of KDE having any kind of brain-dead Marxists >>>>> pushing their garbage on the project. >>>> >>>> I don't doubt that Gnome can be linked to leftist politics, but that's a far >>>> cry from insinuating "Gnome is Antifa" as if the Gnome Foundation is >>>> officially endorsing these violent Antifa morons. >>>> >>>> This appears to be just more Lunduke lying by omission in order to create >>>> click bait. I don't like dishonest bullshit like this. >>> >>> Well, it's not really clickbait in my case since I already have a >>> lifetime subscription to his content. At this point, he doesn't make any >>> more money from me. Either way, I'm happy that he's pointing out what's >>> going on in the circles we don't automatically venture to. Without him >>> pointing it out, I wouldn't have any idea how leftist Mozilla or GNOME >>> are, and I wouldn't be aware of how much spying Firefox does by default. >>> I don't see any real reason to dislike him. >> >> Reporting that there's a dispute on a Gnome blog about a pro-Antifa dink >> would be one thing. Insinuating that "Gnome is Antifa" is another. I don't >> like inaccurate headlines (I call them click bait.) > > Understood. I just don't believe that he's the only clown developing for > GNOME. GNOME itself has/had a 5-year Diversity, Equity and Inclusion > plan which left them broke, they believe in censoring anyone who posts a > Lunduke link, it fired a board member without letting anyone know for > two months, and they had a shaman with no knowledge of software > whatsoever as their hear for nine months. That doesn't strike me as a > software group which shares my values. Neither does Microsoft or Apple. I know Woke BS has invaded a lot of tech outfits, but it's still not the same as saying the Gnome Foundation endorses the Antifa thugs. That's my point. Lunduke can rail on about Gnome's Wokeness all he wants, but to try to somehow associate the Gnome Foundation with Antifa is dishonest click bait. (Unless he has more than this blog to go by.) -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-30 10:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn1013tqi.1aev.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #689706 |
On 2025-04-29, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-04-29 10:21, Borax Man wrote: >>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did to my >>>>>>>>> machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap stuff. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but I think >>>>>>> I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. A >>>>>> quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, it >>>>>> comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>> >>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy to be >>>>> wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is not going >>>>> to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the line of... "even >>>>> the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is pretty good." (I'm still not >>>>> a fan of Gnome 3.) >>>> >>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are proud >>>> members of Antifa. >>>> >>> >>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>> >>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >>> they fit the definition. >> >> A contributor proudly announced that Gnome is Antifa on blogs.gnome.org. > > So is Lunduke basing his Antifa/Ubuntu connection theory on this one > contributor? > > It should be mentioned that the word "ubuntu" had a "philosophical" (almost > religious) meaning before it was used as the name for a Linux distribution. > The fact that Canonical choose this name probably indicates their belief > bias, but I haven't seen any evidence of an official Ubuntu/Antifa > connection. > > If I'm wrong, point me to the link or documentation. > By their own logic, if you have one Nazi at your table, you are all Nazis. Using this standard, they are all Antifa, therefore supporting violence and intimidation for political purposes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 15:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7c9cgFbucaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689681 |
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: > On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did >>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>> >>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>> stuff. >>>>> >>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but >>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. >>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, >>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>> >>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy >>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is >>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the >>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is >>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.) >> >> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are >> proud members of Antifa. >> >> > They are? Thats a concern if true. > > I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, > they fit the definition. That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization. It's a movement -- like skateboarding. And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman; then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa". Oooo, scary. -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.14.4 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G "There is no vaccine against stupidity."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 08:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <zuycnX0rfK05a431nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #689686 |
vallor wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> > wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: > >> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did >>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>> >>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but >>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. >>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, >>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>> >>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy >>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is >>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the >>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is >>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.) >>> >>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are >>> proud members of Antifa. >>> >>> >> They are? Thats a concern if true. >> >> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >> they fit the definition. > > That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization. > It's a movement -- like skateboarding. > > And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman; > then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa". > Oooo, scary. > when did you decide there isn't anything you don't know
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 16:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7cbvgFe38lU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689689 |
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:56:15 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in <zuycnX0rfK05a431nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > vallor wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> >> wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >> >>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did >>>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but >>>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. >>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, >>>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>> >>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy >>>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is >>>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the >>>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is >>>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.) >>>> >>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are >>>> proud members of Antifa. >>>> >>>> >>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>> >>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >>> they fit the definition. >> >> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization. >> It's a movement -- like skateboarding. >> >> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman; >> then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa". >> Oooo, scary. >> > when did you decide there isn't anything you don't know Never -- there's a lot more of what I don't know than what I know. I /do/ know you're following me around like a lost puppy... -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.14.4 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G "Without my ignorance, your knowledge would be meaningless.."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 09:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <rKqcnUKYSIBDn4z1nZ2dnZfqnPg7yJ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #689690 |
vallor wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:56:15 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in > <zuycnX0rfK05a431nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >> vallor wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> >>> wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >>> >>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did >>>>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but >>>>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. >>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, >>>>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy >>>>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is >>>>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the >>>>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is >>>>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.) >>>>> >>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are >>>>> proud members of Antifa. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >>>> they fit the definition. >>> >>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization. >>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding. >>> >>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman; >>> then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa". >>> Oooo, scary. >>> >> when did you decide there isn't anything you don't know > > Never -- there's a lot more of what I don't know than what > I know. > > I /do/ know you're following me around like a lost puppy... > you better get posting
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-30 10:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn1013tnu.1aev.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #689686 |
On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> > wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: > >> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did >>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>> >>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but >>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. >>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, >>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>> >>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy >>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is >>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the >>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is >>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.) >>> >>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are >>> proud members of Antifa. >>> >>> >> They are? Thats a concern if true. >> >> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >> they fit the definition. > > That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization. > It's a movement -- like skateboarding. > > And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman; > then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa". > Oooo, scary. > The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know it. Its a movement, like drug cartels. You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in the name...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-30 09:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <zepQP.1850129$BrX.546048@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #689735 |
On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote: > On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> >> wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >> >>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did >>>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but >>>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. >>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, >>>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>> >>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy >>>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is >>>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the >>>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is >>>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.) >>>> >>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are >>>> proud members of Antifa. >>>> >>>> >>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>> >>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >>> they fit the definition. >> >> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization. >> It's a movement -- like skateboarding. >> >> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman; >> then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa". >> Oooo, scary. >> > > The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know > it. > > Its a movement, like drug cartels. > > You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in > the name... As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a heroic country to them. They're far left in their politics and will gladly rewrite history to fit their beliefs. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-01 14:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101710o.2qk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #689744 |
On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote: >> On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> >>> wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >>> >>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did >>>>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but >>>>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. >>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, >>>>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy >>>>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is >>>>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the >>>>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is >>>>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.) >>>>> >>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are >>>>> proud members of Antifa. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >>>> they fit the definition. >>> >>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization. >>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding. >>> >>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman; >>> then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa". >>> Oooo, scary. >>> >> >> The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know >> it. >> >> Its a movement, like drug cartels. >> >> You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in >> the name... > > As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves > as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a > dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a heroic > country to them. They're far left in their politics and will gladly > rewrite history to fit their beliefs. > I'm Australian, things are different here, and many Americans have this imperialistic, domanting mentality where they think the entire world must adopt their values, their culture, their beliefs, their way of thinking. I don't hate America, but it irks me to see the American MAGA movement copied here (look up Trumpet of Patriots for some cringe), and it also irks me to see Californians, or American Coastal elites more broadly, act as if they have moral authority to make us adopt their rather parochial and extreme values. Unfortunately, Australians follow. It's sad that people like him don't realise that the REST OF THE WORLD sees these city dwelling Californians as loopy. They honestly believe they represent socity and the world. Its just...odd... A delusion. Perhaps only existing because Big Tech is there and they can throw their weight around. Who knows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-01 17:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7hnsoF5tqnU9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689799 |
On Thu, 1 May 2025 14:24:24 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote in <slrn101710o.2qk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: > On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote: >>> On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man >>>> <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote in >>>> <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >>>> >>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps >>>>>>>>>>> did to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a >>>>>>>>>>> mess. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, >>>>>>>>> but I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of >>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. >>>>>>>> Heck, it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just >>>>>>> happy to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. >>>>>>> Ubuntu is not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It >>>>>>> was more in the line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't >>>>>>> particularly like is pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome >>>>>>> 3.) >>>>>> >>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of >>>>>> Ubuntu's interface. However, I won't bother with it if the >>>>>> contributors are proud members of Antifa. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist >>>>> organisation, >>>>> they fit the definition. >>>> >>>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an >>>> organization. >>>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding. >>>> >>>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a >>>> boogieman; then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower >>>> was "Antifa". Oooo, scary. >>>> >>>> >>> The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know >>> it. >>> >>> Its a movement, like drug cartels. >>> >>> You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in >>> the name... >> >> As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves >> as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a >> dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a >> heroic country to them. They're far left in their politics and will >> gladly rewrite history to fit their beliefs. >> >> > I'm Australian, things are different here, and many Americans have this > imperialistic, domanting mentality where they think the entire world > must adopt their values, their culture, their beliefs, their way of > thinking. I don't hate America, but it irks me to see the American MAGA > movement copied here (look up Trumpet of Patriots for some cringe), and > it also irks me to see Californians, or American Coastal elites more > broadly, act as if they have moral authority to make us adopt their > rather parochial and extreme values. Unfortunately, Australians follow. > > It's sad that people like him don't realise that the REST OF THE WORLD > sees these city dwelling Californians as loopy. They honestly believe > they represent socity and the world. Its just...odd... A delusion. > Perhaps only existing because Big Tech is there and they can throw their > weight around. Who knows. What we have here is a case of parataxic distortion -- that is to say, stereotyping. You know almost nothing about me. You also know almost nothing about "Crude Sausage" or RonB, either, and at least the former has no issue with using racial slurs, something I find both extremist and uncalled-for. The problem is extremism. Unfortunately, politics are so polarized now that it's difficult to have a meaningful dialogue. Even in your invective, you've written about protests in the same sentence as shoving the elderly, the latter act which I find especially egregious. But protests? Those are a human right. We've had at least two downtown since Trump was elected. I get police updates via email, and have seen no reports of arrests, either there or in the local paper. But when it comes to politics in cola, I would much rather keep it apolitical and areligious. This seems almost impossible, given the discussions about (say) how "woke" the RC church was under Pope Francis. As I said: the problem is extremism. Regarding California: there's a lot of propaganda floating around. There are farmers here, as well as business owners for establishments of all sizes. If you think California is all one big college campus -- think again, it's not like that, any more than you are like Crocodile Dundee. We are pretty smart, though -- the envy of the rest of the U.S. Maybe that's why they tell so many stories about us. And California just surpassed Japan as the 4th largest economy in the world. I'm co-founder of a business that employs over 800 people, so I'm part of making that happen. So with all that out of the way: if you came across a "Nazi" -- that is to say, a White Supremacist Nationalist -- who was spouting his BS into your face, wouldn't you be tempted to clock him, too? -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.14.4 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G "Dogs think they're human. Cats know they are."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-01 11:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MaqcnVsaedOdKo71nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #689806 |
vallor wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2025 14:24:24 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> > wrote in <slrn101710o.2qk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: > >> On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man >>>>> <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote in >>>>> <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps >>>>>>>>>>>> did to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a >>>>>>>>>>>> mess. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, >>>>>>>>>> but I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of >>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. >>>>>>>>> Heck, it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just >>>>>>>> happy to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. >>>>>>>> Ubuntu is not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It >>>>>>>> was more in the line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't >>>>>>>> particularly like is pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome >>>>>>>> 3.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of >>>>>>> Ubuntu's interface. However, I won't bother with it if the >>>>>>> contributors are proud members of Antifa. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist >>>>>> organisation, >>>>>> they fit the definition. >>>>> >>>>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an >>>>> organization. >>>>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding. >>>>> >>>>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a >>>>> boogieman; then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower >>>>> was "Antifa". Oooo, scary. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know >>>> it. >>>> >>>> Its a movement, like drug cartels. >>>> >>>> You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in >>>> the name... >>> >>> As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves >>> as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a >>> dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a >>> heroic country to them. They're far left in their politics and will >>> gladly rewrite history to fit their beliefs. >>> >>> >> I'm Australian, things are different here, and many Americans have this >> imperialistic, domanting mentality where they think the entire world >> must adopt their values, their culture, their beliefs, their way of >> thinking. I don't hate America, but it irks me to see the American MAGA >> movement copied here (look up Trumpet of Patriots for some cringe), and >> it also irks me to see Californians, or American Coastal elites more >> broadly, act as if they have moral authority to make us adopt their >> rather parochial and extreme values. Unfortunately, Australians follow. >> >> It's sad that people like him don't realise that the REST OF THE WORLD >> sees these city dwelling Californians as loopy. They honestly believe >> they represent socity and the world. Its just...odd... A delusion. >> Perhaps only existing because Big Tech is there and they can throw their >> weight around. Who knows. > > What we have here is a case of parataxic distortion -- that is to say, > stereotyping. > > You know almost nothing about me. You also know almost nothing about > "Crude Sausage" or RonB, either, and at least the former has no issue > with using racial slurs, something I find both extremist and uncalled-for. > > The problem is extremism. Unfortunately, politics are so polarized now > that it's difficult to have a meaningful dialogue. Even in your invective, > you've written about protests in the same sentence as shoving the elderly, > the latter act which I find especially egregious. But protests? > Those are a human right. We've had at least two downtown since Trump > was elected. I get police updates via email, and have seen no reports > of arrests, either there or in the local paper. > > But when it comes to politics in cola, I would much rather keep > it apolitical and areligious. This seems almost impossible, given > the discussions about (say) how "woke" the RC church was under > Pope Francis. As I said: the problem is extremism. > > Regarding California: there's a lot of propaganda floating > around. There are farmers here, as well as business owners > for establishments of all sizes. If you think California > is all one big college campus -- think again, it's not like > that, any more than you are like Crocodile Dundee. > > We are pretty smart, though -- the envy of the rest of the U.S. > Maybe that's why they tell so many stories about us. And > California just surpassed Japan as the 4th largest economy > in the world. I'm co-founder of a business that employs > over 800 people, so I'm part of making that happen. > > So with all that out of the way: if you came across a > "Nazi" -- that is to say, a White Supremacist Nationalist -- who > was spouting his BS into your face, wouldn't you be tempted > to clock him, too? > now , if they all had linux ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-01 19:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hjTQP.33820$4sZa.7327@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #689809 |
On 2025-05-01 14:01, % wrote: > vallor wrote: >> On Thu, 1 May 2025 14:24:24 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> >> wrote in <slrn101710o.2qk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >> >>> On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man >>>>>> <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote in >>>>>> <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps >>>>>>>>>>>>> did to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a >>>>>>>>>>>>> mess. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, >>>>>>>>>>> but I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of >>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. >>>>>>>>>> Heck, it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just >>>>>>>>> happy to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. >>>>>>>>> Ubuntu is not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It >>>>>>>>> was more in the line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't >>>>>>>>> particularly like is pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome >>>>>>>>> 3.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of >>>>>>>> Ubuntu's interface. However, I won't bother with it if the >>>>>>>> contributors are proud members of Antifa. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist >>>>>>> organisation, >>>>>>> they fit the definition. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an >>>>>> organization. >>>>>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding. >>>>>> >>>>>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a >>>>>> boogieman; then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower >>>>>> was "Antifa". Oooo, scary. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know >>>>> it. >>>>> >>>>> Its a movement, like drug cartels. >>>>> >>>>> You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in >>>>> the name... >>>> >>>> As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves >>>> as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a >>>> dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a >>>> heroic country to them. They're far left in their politics and will >>>> gladly rewrite history to fit their beliefs. >>>> >>>> >>> I'm Australian, things are different here, and many Americans have this >>> imperialistic, domanting mentality where they think the entire world >>> must adopt their values, their culture, their beliefs, their way of >>> thinking. I don't hate America, but it irks me to see the American MAGA >>> movement copied here (look up Trumpet of Patriots for some cringe), and >>> it also irks me to see Californians, or American Coastal elites more >>> broadly, act as if they have moral authority to make us adopt their >>> rather parochial and extreme values. Unfortunately, Australians follow. >>> >>> It's sad that people like him don't realise that the REST OF THE WORLD >>> sees these city dwelling Californians as loopy. They honestly believe >>> they represent socity and the world. Its just...odd... A delusion. >>> Perhaps only existing because Big Tech is there and they can throw their >>> weight around. Who knows. >> >> What we have here is a case of parataxic distortion -- that is to say, >> stereotyping. >> >> You know almost nothing about me. You also know almost nothing about >> "Crude Sausage" or RonB, either, and at least the former has no issue >> with using racial slurs, something I find both extremist and uncalled- >> for. >> >> The problem is extremism. Unfortunately, politics are so polarized now >> that it's difficult to have a meaningful dialogue. Even in your >> invective, >> you've written about protests in the same sentence as shoving the >> elderly, >> the latter act which I find especially egregious. But protests? >> Those are a human right. We've had at least two downtown since Trump >> was elected. I get police updates via email, and have seen no reports >> of arrests, either there or in the local paper. >> >> But when it comes to politics in cola, I would much rather keep >> it apolitical and areligious. This seems almost impossible, given >> the discussions about (say) how "woke" the RC church was under >> Pope Francis. As I said: the problem is extremism. >> >> Regarding California: there's a lot of propaganda floating >> around. There are farmers here, as well as business owners >> for establishments of all sizes. If you think California >> is all one big college campus -- think again, it's not like >> that, any more than you are like Crocodile Dundee. >> >> We are pretty smart, though -- the envy of the rest of the U.S. >> Maybe that's why they tell so many stories about us. And >> California just surpassed Japan as the 4th largest economy >> in the world. I'm co-founder of a business that employs >> over 800 people, so I'm part of making that happen. >> >> So with all that out of the way: if you came across a >> "Nazi" -- that is to say, a White Supremacist Nationalist -- who >> was spouting his BS into your face, wouldn't you be tempted >> to clock him, too? >> > now , if they all had linux ... The fat fuck who sees nothing wrong with "punching a Nazi" now wants us to believe that he and his Antifa allies were just "protesting." Rich. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-01 23:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7iehaFdhc7U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689806 |
On 1 May 2025 17:04:24 GMT, vallor wrote: > We are pretty smart, though -- the envy of the rest of the U.S. > Maybe that's why they tell so many stories about us. Nah, you're just weird :) I grew up in upstate NY and as a kid I remember being puzzled by TV shows originating in CA. There was one that made in jokes about Knott's Berry Farm. WTF? I finally made it there in the '90s. It was fun. Tacos? Even in the '70s I remember going into a bar near the Kittery ME Naval Yard that had tacos on the menu. It came in a soup bowl with the shell on the bottom and the usual stuff piled on it, served with a spoon. It's like they read a recipe with the ingredients but didn't really know what to do with them. Summer of Love? I made it to Haight Ashbury about 20 years to late when I had to make an appearance at the Semicon show and had time to play tourist. That was the first time I was in CA. Interesting, but I thought the famed SF sweater weather was just a cold, foggy day on the Maine coast with a hell of a PR campaign. Even the car culture was unique to California. We raced on short dirt tracks. You might race from stop light to stop light but drag racing as a spectator sport wasn't a thing. Mostly nobody had enough money to get into custom cars. The exception was if you needed a pickup and had an old sedan and a cutting torch. No, not envy. I've had many enjoyable experiences in CA and some not so enjoyable. (Don't stay at a motel in Coalinga if the wind is blowing the wrong way), but I've never wanted to live there. My brother liked it when he moved from Ogden to Lompoc but Lompoc isn't really typical CA like Santa Barbara down the road.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 16:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn1019r2m.2rt.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #689806 |
On 2025-05-01, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2025 14:24:24 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> > wrote in <slrn101710o.2qk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: > >> On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man >>>>> <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote in >>>>> <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps >>>>>>>>>>>> did to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a >>>>>>>>>>>> mess. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, >>>>>>>>>> but I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of >>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. >>>>>>>>> Heck, it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just >>>>>>>> happy to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. >>>>>>>> Ubuntu is not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It >>>>>>>> was more in the line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't >>>>>>>> particularly like is pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome >>>>>>>> 3.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of >>>>>>> Ubuntu's interface. However, I won't bother with it if the >>>>>>> contributors are proud members of Antifa. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist >>>>>> organisation, >>>>>> they fit the definition. >>>>> >>>>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an >>>>> organization. >>>>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding. >>>>> >>>>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a >>>>> boogieman; then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower >>>>> was "Antifa". Oooo, scary. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know >>>> it. >>>> >>>> Its a movement, like drug cartels. >>>> >>>> You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in >>>> the name... >>> >>> As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves >>> as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a >>> dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a >>> heroic country to them. They're far left in their politics and will >>> gladly rewrite history to fit their beliefs. >>> >>> >> I'm Australian, things are different here, and many Americans have this >> imperialistic, domanting mentality where they think the entire world >> must adopt their values, their culture, their beliefs, their way of >> thinking. I don't hate America, but it irks me to see the American MAGA >> movement copied here (look up Trumpet of Patriots for some cringe), and >> it also irks me to see Californians, or American Coastal elites more >> broadly, act as if they have moral authority to make us adopt their >> rather parochial and extreme values. Unfortunately, Australians follow. >> >> It's sad that people like him don't realise that the REST OF THE WORLD >> sees these city dwelling Californians as loopy. They honestly believe >> they represent socity and the world. Its just...odd... A delusion. >> Perhaps only existing because Big Tech is there and they can throw their >> weight around. Who knows. > > What we have here is a case of parataxic distortion -- that is to say, > stereotyping. > > You know almost nothing about me. You also know almost nothing about > "Crude Sausage" or RonB, either, and at least the former has no issue > with using racial slurs, something I find both extremist and uncalled-for. > > The problem is extremism. Unfortunately, politics are so polarized now > that it's difficult to have a meaningful dialogue. Even in your invective, > you've written about protests in the same sentence as shoving the elderly, > the latter act which I find especially egregious. But protests? > Those are a human right. We've had at least two downtown since Trump > was elected. I get police updates via email, and have seen no reports > of arrests, either there or in the local paper. > > But when it comes to politics in cola, I would much rather keep > it apolitical and areligious. This seems almost impossible, given > the discussions about (say) how "woke" the RC church was under > Pope Francis. As I said: the problem is extremism. > > Regarding California: there's a lot of propaganda floating > around. There are farmers here, as well as business owners > for establishments of all sizes. If you think California > is all one big college campus -- think again, it's not like > that, any more than you are like Crocodile Dundee. > > We are pretty smart, though -- the envy of the rest of the U.S. > Maybe that's why they tell so many stories about us. And > California just surpassed Japan as the 4th largest economy > in the world. I'm co-founder of a business that employs > over 800 people, so I'm part of making that happen. > > So with all that out of the way: if you came across a > "Nazi" -- that is to say, a White Supremacist Nationalist -- who > was spouting his BS into your face, wouldn't you be tempted > to clock him, too? > >> I've seen women get assaulted by these people. I've witnessed it first hand. Completely unprovoked. Not the only time either... I don't know you, which is why I didn't make any accusations about YOU. I was making statements about another group, that you went to the defense of. I can have civilised discussions with anyone, if they can discuss things in good faith, and not lie to me. I've been tempted on occasion to clock people in the head because of what they say, sure, but I don't, because I'm not a thug. The fact that I don't like what you say doesn't give me that right. Simply feeling that someones ideas are a "threat" doesn't give you that right. I can't just invent justifications and extrapolations to justify lashing out, then blame the victim for making me initiate violence against them. Thats the difference. A civilised person refrains, a scumbag carries through with it. Which are you? Lastly, I don't think the problem is extremism per se, I think it something else, a civilisational failure, but that is a discussion best continued on a group more suited to this, rather than a Linux advocacy one. I WISH Linux was apolitical, but I didn't make it this way. SJW's did. They infiltrated and made it political.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-01 18:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <7SSQP.26481$jo1.1886@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #689799 |
On 2025-05-01 10:24, Borax Man wrote: > On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote: >>> On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> >>>> wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>: >>>> >>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did >>>>>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap >>>>>>>>>> stuff. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but >>>>>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. >>>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, >>>>>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy >>>>>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is >>>>>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the >>>>>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is >>>>>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.) >>>>>> >>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>>>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are >>>>>> proud members of Antifa. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >>>>> they fit the definition. >>>> >>>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization. >>>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding. >>>> >>>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman; >>>> then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa". >>>> Oooo, scary. >>>> >>> >>> The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know >>> it. >>> >>> Its a movement, like drug cartels. >>> >>> You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in >>> the name... >> >> As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves >> as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a >> dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a heroic >> country to them. They're far left in their politics and will gladly >> rewrite history to fit their beliefs. >> > > I'm Australian, things are different here, and many Americans have this > imperialistic, domanting mentality where they think the entire world > must adopt their values, their culture, their beliefs, their way of > thinking. I don't hate America, but it irks me to see the American MAGA > movement copied here (look up Trumpet of Patriots for some cringe), and > it also irks me to see Californians, or American Coastal elites more > broadly, act as if they have moral authority to make us adopt their > rather parochial and extreme values. Unfortunately, Australians follow. > > It's sad that people like him don't realise that the REST OF THE WORLD > sees these city dwelling Californians as loopy. They honestly believe > they represent socity and the world. Its just...odd... A delusion. > Perhaps only existing because Big Tech is there and they can throw their > weight around. Who knows. I agree wholeheartedly. One way of making sure that you're not exposed to it though is to not use any of what Big Tech produces. I always hated how Windows 10/11 decided for me what news sources I should be exposed to when I opened Edge. Just the fact that they insisted I should have Edge installed was a nuisance. Not only can I make sure that it is never on my system in Linux, I get to choose my own news sources because Linux pushes absolutely nothing on me. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 23:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101al4v.2sik.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689799 |
On 2025-05-01, Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote:
>>> On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did
>>>>>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap
>>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but
>>>>>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it.
>>>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck,
>>>>>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy
>>>>>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is
>>>>>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the
>>>>>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is
>>>>>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's
>>>>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are
>>>>>> proud members of Antifa.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation,
>>>>> they fit the definition.
>>>>
>>>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization.
>>>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding.
>>>>
>>>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman;
>>>> then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa".
>>>> Oooo, scary.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Its a movement, like drug cartels.
>>>
>>> You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in
>>> the name...
>>
>> As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves
>> as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a
>> dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a heroic
>> country to them. They're far left in their politics and will gladly
>> rewrite history to fit their beliefs.
>>
>
> I'm Australian, things are different here, and many Americans have this
> imperialistic, domanting mentality where they think the entire world
> must adopt their values, their culture, their beliefs, their way of
> thinking. I don't hate America, but it irks me to see the American MAGA
> movement copied here (look up Trumpet of Patriots for some cringe), and
> it also irks me to see Californians, or American Coastal elites more
> broadly, act as if they have moral authority to make us adopt their
> rather parochial and extreme values. Unfortunately, Australians follow.
>
> It's sad that people like him don't realise that the REST OF THE WORLD
> sees these city dwelling Californians as loopy. They honestly believe
> they represent socity and the world. Its just...odd... A delusion.
> Perhaps only existing because Big Tech is there and they can throw their
> weight around. Who knows.
I'm an American and I'm already fed up with Trump's bullshit attempts at
bullying everyone worldwide — and of his idiot claims about the U.S.'s
superiority. (Latest claim is that the U.S. did most of the heavy fighting
in WWII ("by far the bravest"), while 27 million Russians died in that war.
If Trump's hyperinflated ego was a brain, he'd be an Einstein on steroids.
Unfortunately his ego is made up of hot air and bullshit. And, like an
oscillating fan, he changes direction about every five seconds.
I know in the big scheme of things his attempt at unilaterally renaming the
the Gulf of Mexico, the "Gulf of America" is small potatoes next to his
other, more dangerous, stupidity, but it does highlight the idiot's ego. Now
he's "demanding" that both the Panama Canal and the Suez Canal allow U.S.
ships free passage.
And, of course, I'm also fed up with California Woke bullcrap, but right now
I'm more worried about Trump's BS.
--
Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin
with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-03 01:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101ar5d.7mc.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #689883 |
On 2025-05-02, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2025-05-01, Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote:
>>>> On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com>
>>>>> wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did
>>>>>>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap
>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but
>>>>>>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it.
>>>>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck,
>>>>>>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy
>>>>>>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is
>>>>>>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the
>>>>>>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is
>>>>>>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's
>>>>>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are
>>>>>>> proud members of Antifa.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation,
>>>>>> they fit the definition.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization.
>>>>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman;
>>>>> then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa".
>>>>> Oooo, scary.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> Its a movement, like drug cartels.
>>>>
>>>> You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in
>>>> the name...
>>>
>>> As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves
>>> as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a
>>> dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a heroic
>>> country to them. They're far left in their politics and will gladly
>>> rewrite history to fit their beliefs.
>>>
>>
>> I'm Australian, things are different here, and many Americans have this
>> imperialistic, domanting mentality where they think the entire world
>> must adopt their values, their culture, their beliefs, their way of
>> thinking. I don't hate America, but it irks me to see the American MAGA
>> movement copied here (look up Trumpet of Patriots for some cringe), and
>> it also irks me to see Californians, or American Coastal elites more
>> broadly, act as if they have moral authority to make us adopt their
>> rather parochial and extreme values. Unfortunately, Australians follow.
>>
>> It's sad that people like him don't realise that the REST OF THE WORLD
>> sees these city dwelling Californians as loopy. They honestly believe
>> they represent socity and the world. Its just...odd... A delusion.
>> Perhaps only existing because Big Tech is there and they can throw their
>> weight around. Who knows.
>
> I'm an American and I'm already fed up with Trump's bullshit attempts at
> bullying everyone worldwide — and of his idiot claims about the U.S.'s
> superiority. (Latest claim is that the U.S. did most of the heavy fighting
> in WWII ("by far the bravest"), while 27 million Russians died in that war.
> If Trump's hyperinflated ego was a brain, he'd be an Einstein on steroids.
> Unfortunately his ego is made up of hot air and bullshit. And, like an
> oscillating fan, he changes direction about every five seconds.
>
> I know in the big scheme of things his attempt at unilaterally renaming the
> the Gulf of Mexico, the "Gulf of America" is small potatoes next to his
> other, more dangerous, stupidity, but it does highlight the idiot's ego. Now
> he's "demanding" that both the Panama Canal and the Suez Canal allow U.S.
> ships free passage.
>
> And, of course, I'm also fed up with California Woke bullcrap, but right now
> I'm more worried about Trump's BS.
>
Lucky I'm in Australia then! We'll, we have our own problems, namely
that the government decided that we shouldn't be able to afford a roof
over our head, and that our cities need to become overcrowded slums
ASAP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-03 03:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7lielFsk04U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689898 |
On Sat, 3 May 2025 01:09:02 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote: > Lucky I'm in Australia then! We'll, we have our own problems, namely > that the government decided that we shouldn't be able to afford a roof > over our head, and that our cities need to become overcrowded slums > ASAP. Long time coming... I gave serious consideration to emigrating in the '80s but then I realized it would be out of the frying pan and into the fire -- and the fire would burn me faster. Times apparently have changed. Back then if you wanted to emigrate you'd better be bringing something to the table.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-03 05:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101bb60.7uk4.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689898 |
On 2025-05-03, Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 2025-05-02, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2025-05-01, Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-04-30 06:10, Borax Man wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap
>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but
>>>>>>>>>>> I think I've got it all cleared now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it.
>>>>>>>>>> A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck,
>>>>>>>>>> it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy
>>>>>>>>> to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is
>>>>>>>>> not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the
>>>>>>>>> line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is
>>>>>>>>> pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's
>>>>>>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are
>>>>>>>> proud members of Antifa.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation,
>>>>>>> they fit the definition.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization.
>>>>>> It's a movement -- like skateboarding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman;
>>>>>> then you know where they stand. For example: Eisenhower was "Antifa".
>>>>>> Oooo, scary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its a movement, like drug cartels.
>>>>>
>>>>> You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in
>>>>> the name...
>>>>
>>>> As far as I know, fat vallor is from San Francisco. They see themselves
>>>> as heroes because they let their homeless create tent cities and take a
>>>> dump anywhere they want on the street. I'm sure all of India is a heroic
>>>> country to them. They're far left in their politics and will gladly
>>>> rewrite history to fit their beliefs.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm Australian, things are different here, and many Americans have this
>>> imperialistic, domanting mentality where they think the entire world
>>> must adopt their values, their culture, their beliefs, their way of
>>> thinking. I don't hate America, but it irks me to see the American MAGA
>>> movement copied here (look up Trumpet of Patriots for some cringe), and
>>> it also irks me to see Californians, or American Coastal elites more
>>> broadly, act as if they have moral authority to make us adopt their
>>> rather parochial and extreme values. Unfortunately, Australians follow.
>>>
>>> It's sad that people like him don't realise that the REST OF THE WORLD
>>> sees these city dwelling Californians as loopy. They honestly believe
>>> they represent socity and the world. Its just...odd... A delusion.
>>> Perhaps only existing because Big Tech is there and they can throw their
>>> weight around. Who knows.
>>
>> I'm an American and I'm already fed up with Trump's bullshit attempts at
>> bullying everyone worldwide — and of his idiot claims about the U.S.'s
>> superiority. (Latest claim is that the U.S. did most of the heavy fighting
>> in WWII ("by far the bravest"), while 27 million Russians died in that war.
>> If Trump's hyperinflated ego was a brain, he'd be an Einstein on steroids.
>> Unfortunately his ego is made up of hot air and bullshit. And, like an
>> oscillating fan, he changes direction about every five seconds.
>>
>> I know in the big scheme of things his attempt at unilaterally renaming the
>> the Gulf of Mexico, the "Gulf of America" is small potatoes next to his
>> other, more dangerous, stupidity, but it does highlight the idiot's ego. Now
>> he's "demanding" that both the Panama Canal and the Suez Canal allow U.S.
>> ships free passage.
>>
>> And, of course, I'm also fed up with California Woke bullcrap, but right now
>> I'm more worried about Trump's BS.
>>
>
> Lucky I'm in Australia then! We'll, we have our own problems, namely
> that the government decided that we shouldn't be able to afford a roof
> over our head, and that our cities need to become overcrowded slums
> ASAP.
We've got the same issue with roofs over our heads issue in this country.
The family home is rapidly being rapidly replaced by apartments and "town
houses," with no property for gardens or self-sufficiency of any kind. The
percentage of those who own their own homes keeps dropping.
"You'll own nothing and like it" as Klaus Schwab (who definitely owns a lot)
was fond of saying. Funny how these wannabe world rulers never apply their
Woke BS to themselves. Self-centered hypocrites.
--
Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin
with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web