Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #689068 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-04-17 09:19 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-04-20 09:06 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 126 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
(OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 09:19 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-17 09:02 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-04-17 19:41 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-17 17:48 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 23:09 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-17 20:46 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-17 21:36 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-18 06:08 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 06:14 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-18 14:46 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-19 09:04 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-19 19:54 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-20 05:02 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-30 09:35 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-30 21:53 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 23:04 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-18 01:38 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 19:25 -0700
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-18 02:45 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 06:23 -0700
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-18 07:00 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-18 10:09 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-18 18:15 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 12:33 -0700
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 20:39 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 20:34 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 13:35 -0700
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-19 00:30 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-19 20:02 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-17 16:05 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-17 17:49 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-18 14:55 +0100
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-18 10:19 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-19 09:11 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-19 15:39 +0100
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 07:48 -0700
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-19 13:46 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 12:29 -0700
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 23:10 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-18 14:57 +0100
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 20:41 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-18 22:01 +0100
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 21:10 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 14:18 -0700
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-19 07:56 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-19 14:36 +0100
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-19 13:13 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-19 18:21 +0100
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 12:25 -0700
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-21 04:40 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-21 07:50 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-21 21:52 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-21 21:04 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-22 06:05 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-22 08:51 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-23 05:12 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-23 07:45 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-23 04:38 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 12:46 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-23 08:43 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 12:58 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-24 09:09 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 01:22 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-24 21:33 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-25 05:34 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-25 09:26 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 02:37 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-26 07:41 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 02:35 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-26 08:08 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 05:55 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-27 08:14 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-26 07:41 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-04-26 12:40 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-26 08:58 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:30 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:29 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-04-27 08:01 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-27 18:46 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-27 14:46 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:13 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-27 14:37 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-28 03:25 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:36 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 06:39 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-28 07:20 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:23 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:52 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 19:46 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 16:42 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-29 03:43 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 09:20 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 20:47 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 17:25 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-29 18:44 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 20:14 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 06:04 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 09:22 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 20:49 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 17:26 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-29 03:38 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 06:08 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-04-28 08:24 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-28 18:33 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:43 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-28 18:40 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 16:37 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-29 03:20 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 09:18 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 20:46 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 17:23 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 20:00 -0700
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-25 09:25 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-18 22:34 +0100
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-19 20:04 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-30 18:28 -0500
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-19 07:53 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-19 14:36 +0100
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-19 13:14 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-19 18:26 +0100
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-19 13:47 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-04-19 13:48 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-19 13:15 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-04-20 10:39 -0400
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-20 15:26 +0000
Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-20 09:06 -0700
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 03:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7avtsF7nq6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689618 |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:46:09 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > As for Iranians, yes they had a secular government — until they made the > "mistake" of wanting to profit from their own oil instead of letting > U.S. and European companies take it all. The U.S. sponsored a coup > against the elected government and installed the Shah of Iran and his > thug police. So there is no love for the United States in Iran, even if > many of the citizens long for the days of a secular government. And > here's the important thing to remember about Iranians. If you attack > them, they unite. Even the opposition is patriotic. (Even Iranian Jews > are patriotic.) These are not Arabs who break up into rival tribes when > they see a chance to work with an outside, invading power, for their own > gain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Separation In a way it's a family drama but it's interesting to see the differences between the middle family and the lower class. It also brings in what I mentioned. The daughter uses an Arabic word and the father corrects her. 'We are Persians. The right term is ...'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 06:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn1010r72.19bh.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689656 |
On 2025-04-29, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:46:09 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > >> As for Iranians, yes they had a secular government — until they made the >> "mistake" of wanting to profit from their own oil instead of letting >> U.S. and European companies take it all. The U.S. sponsored a coup >> against the elected government and installed the Shah of Iran and his >> thug police. So there is no love for the United States in Iran, even if >> many of the citizens long for the days of a secular government. And >> here's the important thing to remember about Iranians. If you attack >> them, they unite. Even the opposition is patriotic. (Even Iranian Jews >> are patriotic.) These are not Arabs who break up into rival tribes when >> they see a chance to work with an outside, invading power, for their own >> gain. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Separation > > In a way it's a family drama but it's interesting to see the differences > between the middle family and the lower class. It also brings in what I > mentioned. The daughter uses an Arabic word and the father corrects her. > 'We are Persians. The right term is ...'. Looks interesting. Thanks for the link. -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-28 08:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vuns1v$3999j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #689577 |
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 06:39:41 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > >> There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than >> others. >> The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's >> nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to? >> >> Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify >> as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country. > > To further complicate it, Arabs are a small minority in Iran and > frequently persecuted. Iran inherited what was called Arabistan from the > Ottoman Empire and it's been a thorn in their side. The Persians are an > Indo-European people, or what was called Aryan before some unfortunate > 20th century events. They don't like Arabs, who are a Semitic people. > > It's like one of those logic statements. Most Arabs are Moslems but most > Moslems aren't Arabs. The Arabs seem to be the least civilized. Can you speak to their usage of Linux? :-) -- Ask not for whom the <CONTROL-G> tolls.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-28 18:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m79vvnF2ruvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689589 |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:24:31 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > >> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 06:39:41 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: >> >>> There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than >>> others. >>> The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's >>> nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to? >>> >>> Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify >>> as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country. >> >> To further complicate it, Arabs are a small minority in Iran and >> frequently persecuted. Iran inherited what was called Arabistan from >> the Ottoman Empire and it's been a thorn in their side. The Persians >> are an Indo-European people, or what was called Aryan before some >> unfortunate 20th century events. They don't like Arabs, who are a >> Semitic people. >> >> It's like one of those logic statements. Most Arabs are Moslems but >> most Moslems aren't Arabs. The Arabs seem to be the least civilized. > > Can you speak to their usage of Linux? :-) https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7318
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-28 08:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <BJKPP.534543$541.506366@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #689576 |
On 2025-04-28 02:39, RonB wrote: > On 2025-04-27, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 4/27/25 02:13, RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-04-26, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 4/25/25 22:35, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-25, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 4/24/25 21:22, RonB wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> As for Palestine pre-Israel, you don't have to go by narrative you just have >>>>>>> to go by history. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm aware of the history. Weren't different factions fighting for >>>>>> control of that territory before the British gave it away? Wouldn't that >>>>>> suggest that they were at odds and therefore not peaceful? >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, they were called Zionist terrorists (the gangs who bombed the buses, >>>>> etc.). And that began happening shortly before the British gave them the >>>>> Zionist state by stealing it from the Palestinians. It was the beginning of >>>>> the terrorist state called Israel, not reflected in the centuries before >>>>> that the terrorists began Zionist terrorist campaign. >>>> >>>> That might be the case. However, I've seen how Muslims deal with debates >>>> on religion and how much respect they offer to people who think >>>> differently. To say the least, they are very violent. It's not normal >>>> that I wouldn't be able to analyze a song with my students because >>>> Muhammad in the corner was told that music is haram and will get violent >>>> if I play it. It's not normal that I can't watch a show with the kids >>>> because Muhammad Jr. in the corner thinks two characters kissing is >>>> haram and will get violent if I show it. It's not normal that I >>>> constantly have to worry about the crucifix I wear showing because >>>> Muhammad the Third in the corner was taught that Jesus didn't really die >>>> on the cross and will get violent if he sees it. The reality is that it >>>> is impossible to live peacefully with them because every value we have >>>> and every sign we display is offensive to them. >>> >>> Christians in Israel face the same kind of issues with the Orthodox Jews >>> (and the IDF). They're spit on and their churches are shuttered on Christian >>> holy days. >>> >>> I'm not a Muslim and I don't like a lot of their crap, but you've got to >>> remember, it was the Palestinians who were driven out of their homes and >>> businesses and were driven into refugee camps. These homes and businesses >>> were given to the Jews (simply because they were Jews) who streamed in from >>> all over the world. >>> >>> Europe (and the U.S. and Canada) are doing something similar by moving >>> illegal aliens (many Muslim) to the front of the line for benefits while the >>> native citizens stand at the back of the line and watch. I know you already >>> resent this, but how much more would you resent having your home confiscated >>> from you and given to an illegal alien? (Probably a Muslim.) >>> >>> That's what happened to the Palestinians. Gaza is basically an open air >>> prison. And American Jews "vacation" in Israel by burning down orchards and >>> destroying homes while backed by the IDF on the West Bank. They then claim >>> the property for their own. There's only so much of that crap that anyone >>> can take. >>> >>> So, while I don't like the Muslim religion, I can understand what drives >>> their hatred for the Israelis. Under similar circumstances you would >>> probably be a "terrorist" as well. (As if carpet bombing civilians, and >>> denying them food, water and medicine is not the act of terrorist and >>> genocidal state.) >> >> The Gazans have a reason to hate Jews, but they would have hated them >> regardless of whether anything had been done to them. Heck, the entire >> religion advocates for a hatred of both Christians and Jews, the latter >> of which was on the pretense that they had persecuted Muhammad. Of >> course, no evidence of this exists outside the Koran. Heck, in most >> reports within the Koran, it is said that the Muslims were treated well >> by the Jewish hosts. Of course, it doesn't matter how well you were >> treated once you have an army much larger than that of your hosts. >> >> This is a pattern we constantly see with Muslim: peaceful until they >> have the numbers. > > There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than others. > The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's nearly > always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to? The ones with money located in Saudi Arabia. I find it abhorrent how the United States works with the country in everything. Heck, even professional wrestling has events there on a regular basis. However, Muslims in Saudi Arabia and Iran are apparently converting to Christianity in large numbers. The story is the same in Iran except that the number of converts there is a lot larger. Perhaps their exposure to Western media and content plays a part? Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" is a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies. Perhaps exposure to Western content also played a part. > Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify as > Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country. I hope that is the case. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-28 18:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7a0ccF2ruvU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689596 |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now > available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" is > a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies. Perhaps > exposure to Western content also played a part. Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-28 16:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4GRPP.758282$D41.630614@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #689614 |
On 2025-04-28 14:40, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now >> available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" is >> a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies. Perhaps >> exposure to Western content also played a part. > > Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews I think they just enjoy the fact that they can have a number of wives and don't want to admit that it's all garbage. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 03:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7aurgF7bi1U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689627 |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:37:20 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-04-28 14:40, rbowman wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now >>> available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" >>> is a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies. >>> Perhaps exposure to Western content also played a part. >> >> Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews > > I think they just enjoy the fact that they can have a number of wives > and don't want to admit that it's all garbage. Garbage sells. https://ldschurchgrowth.blogspot.com/ Mainstream Christian churches are losing members but they keep on growing. There is a temple planned for here and there are already a number of ward churches or whatever they are called. There is a LDS fundamentalist town about 30 miles south. It's generally believed they are polygamists but they don't cause problems so it's don't ask, don't tell.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 09:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qk4QP.2986765$t84d.2342463@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #689655 |
On 2025-04-28 23:20, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:37:20 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-04-28 14:40, rbowman wrote: >>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now >>>> available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" >>>> is a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies. >>>> Perhaps exposure to Western content also played a part. >>> >>> Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews >> >> I think they just enjoy the fact that they can have a number of wives >> and don't want to admit that it's all garbage. > > Garbage sells. > > https://ldschurchgrowth.blogspot.com/ > > Mainstream Christian churches are losing members but they keep on growing. > There is a temple planned for here and there are already a number of ward > churches or whatever they are called. > > There is a LDS fundamentalist town about 30 miles south. It's generally > believed they are polygamists but they don't cause problems so it's don't > ask, don't tell. The question for me is whether I want to join a religion because of the benefits it offers while I live or do I want to join the true faith shared by God. In my case, it's the latter. I would be wary of any sect which promises me all sorts of wonderful luxuries if I join. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 20:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn1012ekr.20o7.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689669 |
On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-04-28 23:20, rbowman wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:37:20 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> On 2025-04-28 14:40, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> >>>>> Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now >>>>> available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" >>>>> is a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies. >>>>> Perhaps exposure to Western content also played a part. >>>> >>>> Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church. >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews >>> >>> I think they just enjoy the fact that they can have a number of wives >>> and don't want to admit that it's all garbage. >> >> Garbage sells. >> >> https://ldschurchgrowth.blogspot.com/ >> >> Mainstream Christian churches are losing members but they keep on growing. >> There is a temple planned for here and there are already a number of ward >> churches or whatever they are called. >> >> There is a LDS fundamentalist town about 30 miles south. It's generally >> believed they are polygamists but they don't cause problems so it's don't >> ask, don't tell. > > The question for me is whether I want to join a religion because of the > benefits it offers while I live or do I want to join the true faith > shared by God. In my case, it's the latter. I would be wary of any sect > which promises me all sorts of wonderful luxuries if I join. When my brother worked with Mormons in Idaho Falls, he would share rides with his co-workers. When they would drive home his Mormon co-worker would always point to a big house on the side of the highway. He would say, "This is where our bishop lives... awfully BIG for ONE family, isn't it?" I guess he was proud that his bishop was a polygamist. -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 17:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qrbQP.1839110$BrX.513981@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #689703 |
On 2025-04-29 16:46, RonB wrote: > On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-04-28 23:20, rbowman wrote: >>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:37:20 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> On 2025-04-28 14:40, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now >>>>>> available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" >>>>>> is a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies. >>>>>> Perhaps exposure to Western content also played a part. >>>>> >>>>> Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church. >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews >>>> >>>> I think they just enjoy the fact that they can have a number of wives >>>> and don't want to admit that it's all garbage. >>> >>> Garbage sells. >>> >>> https://ldschurchgrowth.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> Mainstream Christian churches are losing members but they keep on growing. >>> There is a temple planned for here and there are already a number of ward >>> churches or whatever they are called. >>> >>> There is a LDS fundamentalist town about 30 miles south. It's generally >>> believed they are polygamists but they don't cause problems so it's don't >>> ask, don't tell. >> >> The question for me is whether I want to join a religion because of the >> benefits it offers while I live or do I want to join the true faith >> shared by God. In my case, it's the latter. I would be wary of any sect >> which promises me all sorts of wonderful luxuries if I join. > > When my brother worked with Mormons in Idaho Falls, he would share rides > with his co-workers. When they would drive home his Mormon co-worker would > always point to a big house on the side of the highway. He would say, "This > is where our bishop lives... awfully BIG for ONE family, isn't it?" > > I guess he was proud that his bishop was a polygamist. One woman is enough trouble for me. Of course, if all those women are submissive and don't complain about everything like most women do, I can imagine it not being too demanding. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-24 20:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bLudnZx6Rr1sZ5f1nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #689439 |
RonB wrote: > On 2025-04-24, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-04-24 08:58, RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-04-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-23 01:12, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-22 02:05, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/21/25 17:52, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 4/21/25 00:40, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-19, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rebelnews.com/man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 weeks for >>>>>>>>>>>> sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp group chat and >>>>>>>>>>>> charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Not like the "mostly peaceful" BLM riots, eh? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Even "mostly peaceful" riots where only a few people are killed or beaten, >>>>>>>>>>> and only a few dozen buildings are burned down and only a few hundred shops >>>>>>>>>>> are looted and vandalized? Are you TRYING to offend BLM because, you know, >>>>>>>>>>> black lives matter. But it's "racist" to say "white lives matter," don't you >>>>>>>>>>> know? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over-racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Promoting racism is not just "posting memes". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And burning, looting, beating and murder are not racist if they're done >>>>>>>>>>> under the flag of "BLM." They're just "mostly peaceful" protests. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just "posting >>>>>>>>>>>> memes". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I hope you're not speaking about the racist BLM. Those racists don't like to >>>>>>>>>>> be called racists. You could lose your Woke card and be summarily canceled >>>>>>>>>>> — maybe even jailed for racism. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Better trod carefully when speaking out against "mostly peaceful" riots. Be >>>>>>>>>>> sure you know who's ox is being gored. Sometimes it's hard to tell the >>>>>>>>>>> difference between a "mostly peaceful" protest and a riot, don't you know. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It sounds to me like Snipe left because he realized that he wasn't in an >>>>>>>>>> echo chamber where everyone is forced to agree with his stupidity or get >>>>>>>>>> banned (or doxxed). I hope he enjoys the choir of BlueSky. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not in favor of riots. They are, by their nature, not "mostly peaceful." >>>>>>>>> But I've got a feeling that Snipe opposed them (or not) depending on who was >>>>>>>>> doing the "mostly peaceful protesting." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I used to want to talk to people with opposing opinions and see if we >>>>>>>> have common ground somewhere, but with my older age I've lost all >>>>>>>> interest because they never make any kind of sense. It's the same thing >>>>>>>> with Muslims and their near total, purposeful misunderstanding of the >>>>>>>> Christian religion to further their own. If Snipe doesn't like that we >>>>>>>> have a different opinion, he's free to join Larry Pietraskiewicz in that >>>>>>>> abandoned linux group he once tried to get us to migrate to. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The days of disagreeing but still getting along are long gone. The Woke >>>>>>> cancel culture is for immediate dismissal of the person who disagrees with >>>>>>> them. If they can cancel, they cancel, if they can't cancel they retreat. >>>>>>> Any time you disagree with one of these Woke whiners, they call you a >>>>>>> "hater" for taking a contrary position and arguing with them. This is what >>>>>>> cults do, these are not the actions of reasonable people. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My family was always an arguing family. We would argue politics, even >>>>>>> religion, and ten minutes the argument was forgotten. I've never understood >>>>>>> cliquish cult mentality. I've never wanted to be part of a clique. >>>>>> >>>>>> This morning, I actually discovered that my old high school buddy, who >>>>>> went from working as a Director of Engineering at Microsoft to doing the >>>>>> same at Google, actually left the corporation recently to start work at >>>>>> some AI company called Snowflake. I can imagine what would prompt a >>>>>> person to leave a lucrative, comfortable position at Google, but I >>>>>> imagine that a Coptic Christian whose father escaped a position as >>>>>> doctor in Egypt because of Muslim bullying to come to Montreal and work >>>>>> at The Bay could see the writing on the wall. The guy probably just >>>>>> wanted to do his job and create some new technology, but faggots kept >>>>>> talking about their genders, privilege, white supremacy, how black lives >>>>>> matter, how Israel is participating in genocide and so on. If I were >>>>>> still speaking to him, I'd congratulate him for jumping off the sinking >>>>>> ship of wokeness. >>>>> >>>>> NutYahoo in Israel IS genocidal. You can't call it much else when they >>>>> carpet bomb women and children trapped in Gaza, and don't allow food and >>>>> health supplies in. >>>>> >>>>> Other than that, yeah. >>>> >>>> I'm sure that a lot of what Israel is doing is not by the book. However, >>>> having spent a lot of time with Muslims, I know how sneaky they are. >>>> Whenever there is any kind of altercation, they will claim to be >>>> victims. You can actually spot them committing a crime and they will say >>>> that the crime was committed against them. If you have a mountain of >>>> evidence against them, their first instinct is to manipulate and make a >>>> deal. There is no possibility of self-reflection whatsoever in that >>>> community. That's why I am convinced that a lot of the stories we get >>>> about how the Gazans are victims are also manipulated to make them look >>>> like victims. >>>> >>>> If any of you have had only limited interaction with Muslims, I would >>>> suggest you watch videos from YouTube where Christians, armed with loads >>>> of evidence about the Koran's contradictions and lies, interrupt, talk >>>> over and attack people demonstrating that Islam is a religion of >>>> bullshit. It is like they've been trained since birth to wage taqiyya >>>> against anyone who points out their many flaws. >>> >>> I think "not by the book" is letting them off with genocide with a light tap >>> on the wrist. These sons of bitches in Israel have been murdering >>> Palestinians for over 70 years. Even before this latest war, they regularly >>> "mowed the grass" (their term) in Gaza about every three years. By "mowing >>> the grass" they meant arbitrarily bombing civilians, men, women and >>> children. One of their more infamous bombings was during the hour of the day >>> when children were walking home from school. The bastards in the Israeli >>> government are satanic. >>> >>> Palestine was not always Muslim. The Christians that lived there have pretty >>> much been eradicated, The ones that remain are spit on by the Orthodox Jews. >>> Before the Israeli terrorist thugs made Israel a "state" they're the ones >>> who were bombing buses and homes and they stole these homes from the >>> Palestinians. >>> >>> Buying into this "fake news" narrative about the genocide is to fall for >>> Israeli propaganda. These damn bastards actually call children "terrorists." >>> Peace will only come to the Middle East when the Israeli government is >>> eradicated. >>> >>> Before the Israeli terrorists agitated for and created their Zionist >>> "state," Jews, Christians and Muslims lived in Palestine in peace with one >>> another. >>> >>> NutYahoo is doing his best to destroy Israel. I hope he soon complete the >>> job. >> >> For my part, I don't really care about either side. Israel doesn't care >> about Christians unless they need money or people to fight for them. >> Similarly, Muslims don't care about us and would be glad to kill us >> and/or rape out wives. There is a chance that Christians and Muslims >> lived in peace, but I have a lot of trouble believing that narrative >> considering what their scripture says about how we should be treated. > > As for Palestine pre-Israel, you don't have to go by narrative you just have > to go by history. > i only go by american history it's the funniest
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-25 09:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <M2MOP.2021646$FVcd.1426965@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #689445 |
On 2025-04-24 23:00, % wrote: > RonB wrote: >> On 2025-04-24, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-04-24 08:58, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-23 01:12, RonB wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-22 02:05, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 4/21/25 17:52, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/21/25 00:40, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-19, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rebelnews.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks for >>>>>>>>>>>>> sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp >>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat and >>>>>>>>>>>>> charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"." >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not like the "mostly peaceful" BLM riots, eh? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Even "mostly peaceful" riots where only a few people are >>>>>>>>>>>> killed or beaten, >>>>>>>>>>>> and only a few dozen buildings are burned down and only a >>>>>>>>>>>> few hundred shops >>>>>>>>>>>> are looted and vandalized? Are you TRYING to offend BLM >>>>>>>>>>>> because, you know, >>>>>>>>>>>> black lives matter. But it's "racist" to say "white lives >>>>>>>>>>>> matter," don't you >>>>>>>>>>>> know? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Promoting racism is not just "posting memes". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And burning, looting, beating and murder are not racist if >>>>>>>>>>>> they're done >>>>>>>>>>>> under the flag of "BLM." They're just "mostly peaceful" >>>>>>>>>>>> protests. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just >>>>>>>>>>>>> "posting >>>>>>>>>>>>> memes". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I hope you're not speaking about the racist BLM. Those >>>>>>>>>>>> racists don't like to >>>>>>>>>>>> be called racists. You could lose your Woke card and be >>>>>>>>>>>> summarily canceled >>>>>>>>>>>> — maybe even jailed for racism. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Better trod carefully when speaking out against "mostly >>>>>>>>>>>> peaceful" riots. Be >>>>>>>>>>>> sure you know who's ox is being gored. Sometimes it's hard >>>>>>>>>>>> to tell the >>>>>>>>>>>> difference between a "mostly peaceful" protest and a riot, >>>>>>>>>>>> don't you know. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It sounds to me like Snipe left because he realized that he >>>>>>>>>>> wasn't in an >>>>>>>>>>> echo chamber where everyone is forced to agree with his >>>>>>>>>>> stupidity or get >>>>>>>>>>> banned (or doxxed). I hope he enjoys the choir of BlueSky. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm not in favor of riots. They are, by their nature, not >>>>>>>>>> "mostly peaceful." >>>>>>>>>> But I've got a feeling that Snipe opposed them (or not) >>>>>>>>>> depending on who was >>>>>>>>>> doing the "mostly peaceful protesting." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I used to want to talk to people with opposing opinions and see >>>>>>>>> if we >>>>>>>>> have common ground somewhere, but with my older age I've lost all >>>>>>>>> interest because they never make any kind of sense. It's the >>>>>>>>> same thing >>>>>>>>> with Muslims and their near total, purposeful misunderstanding >>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>> Christian religion to further their own. If Snipe doesn't like >>>>>>>>> that we >>>>>>>>> have a different opinion, he's free to join Larry >>>>>>>>> Pietraskiewicz in that >>>>>>>>> abandoned linux group he once tried to get us to migrate to. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The days of disagreeing but still getting along are long gone. >>>>>>>> The Woke >>>>>>>> cancel culture is for immediate dismissal of the person who >>>>>>>> disagrees with >>>>>>>> them. If they can cancel, they cancel, if they can't cancel they >>>>>>>> retreat. >>>>>>>> Any time you disagree with one of these Woke whiners, they call >>>>>>>> you a >>>>>>>> "hater" for taking a contrary position and arguing with them. >>>>>>>> This is what >>>>>>>> cults do, these are not the actions of reasonable people. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My family was always an arguing family. We would argue politics, >>>>>>>> even >>>>>>>> religion, and ten minutes the argument was forgotten. I've never >>>>>>>> understood >>>>>>>> cliquish cult mentality. I've never wanted to be part of a clique. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This morning, I actually discovered that my old high school >>>>>>> buddy, who >>>>>>> went from working as a Director of Engineering at Microsoft to >>>>>>> doing the >>>>>>> same at Google, actually left the corporation recently to start >>>>>>> work at >>>>>>> some AI company called Snowflake. I can imagine what would prompt a >>>>>>> person to leave a lucrative, comfortable position at Google, but I >>>>>>> imagine that a Coptic Christian whose father escaped a position as >>>>>>> doctor in Egypt because of Muslim bullying to come to Montreal >>>>>>> and work >>>>>>> at The Bay could see the writing on the wall. The guy probably just >>>>>>> wanted to do his job and create some new technology, but faggots >>>>>>> kept >>>>>>> talking about their genders, privilege, white supremacy, how >>>>>>> black lives >>>>>>> matter, how Israel is participating in genocide and so on. If I were >>>>>>> still speaking to him, I'd congratulate him for jumping off the >>>>>>> sinking >>>>>>> ship of wokeness. >>>>>> >>>>>> NutYahoo in Israel IS genocidal. You can't call it much else when >>>>>> they >>>>>> carpet bomb women and children trapped in Gaza, and don't allow >>>>>> food and >>>>>> health supplies in. >>>>>> >>>>>> Other than that, yeah. >>>>> >>>>> I'm sure that a lot of what Israel is doing is not by the book. >>>>> However, >>>>> having spent a lot of time with Muslims, I know how sneaky they are. >>>>> Whenever there is any kind of altercation, they will claim to be >>>>> victims. You can actually spot them committing a crime and they >>>>> will say >>>>> that the crime was committed against them. If you have a mountain of >>>>> evidence against them, their first instinct is to manipulate and >>>>> make a >>>>> deal. There is no possibility of self-reflection whatsoever in that >>>>> community. That's why I am convinced that a lot of the stories we get >>>>> about how the Gazans are victims are also manipulated to make them >>>>> look >>>>> like victims. >>>>> >>>>> If any of you have had only limited interaction with Muslims, I would >>>>> suggest you watch videos from YouTube where Christians, armed with >>>>> loads >>>>> of evidence about the Koran's contradictions and lies, interrupt, talk >>>>> over and attack people demonstrating that Islam is a religion of >>>>> bullshit. It is like they've been trained since birth to wage taqiyya >>>>> against anyone who points out their many flaws. >>>> >>>> I think "not by the book" is letting them off with genocide with a >>>> light tap >>>> on the wrist. These sons of bitches in Israel have been murdering >>>> Palestinians for over 70 years. Even before this latest war, they >>>> regularly >>>> "mowed the grass" (their term) in Gaza about every three years. By >>>> "mowing >>>> the grass" they meant arbitrarily bombing civilians, men, women and >>>> children. One of their more infamous bombings was during the hour of >>>> the day >>>> when children were walking home from school. The bastards in the >>>> Israeli >>>> government are satanic. >>>> >>>> Palestine was not always Muslim. The Christians that lived there >>>> have pretty >>>> much been eradicated, The ones that remain are spit on by the >>>> Orthodox Jews. >>>> Before the Israeli terrorist thugs made Israel a "state" they're the >>>> ones >>>> who were bombing buses and homes and they stole these homes from the >>>> Palestinians. >>>> >>>> Buying into this "fake news" narrative about the genocide is to fall >>>> for >>>> Israeli propaganda. These damn bastards actually call children >>>> "terrorists." >>>> Peace will only come to the Middle East when the Israeli government is >>>> eradicated. >>>> >>>> Before the Israeli terrorists agitated for and created their Zionist >>>> "state," Jews, Christians and Muslims lived in Palestine in peace >>>> with one >>>> another. >>>> >>>> NutYahoo is doing his best to destroy Israel. I hope he soon >>>> complete the >>>> job. >>> >>> For my part, I don't really care about either side. Israel doesn't care >>> about Christians unless they need money or people to fight for them. >>> Similarly, Muslims don't care about us and would be glad to kill us >>> and/or rape out wives. There is a chance that Christians and Muslims >>> lived in peace, but I have a lot of trouble believing that narrative >>> considering what their scripture says about how we should be treated. >> >> As for Palestine pre-Israel, you don't have to go by narrative you >> just have >> to go by history. >> > i only go by american history it's the funniest It's definitely the one where there is the most action. Andrew "Action" Jackson is my favourite. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-18 22:34 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1rb0bmt.5trpk9wvql5fN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #689206 |
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > > RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> >> > RonB wrote: [...] > >> >> >>It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. > >> >> >>Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision. > >> >> > > >> >> > That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting > >> >> > reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed. > >> >> > >> >> I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. > >> >> They're that far gone with this Woke stupidity. > >> > > >> > Have you been to Britain, RonB? > >> > >> Nope. But I can read. > > > > From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it > > a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news? > > Are you going to deny that people have been jailed for posting memes > in Britain? If so you better get hold of the British press and tell them, > because they seem to be "confused" on the subject. At this moment I am neither denying nor confirming anything. I asked you a question which you have not yet answered, RonB. When you've done that, kindly give chapter and verse about "people have been jailed for posting memes in Britain". -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, PTB, FIBS My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-19 20:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <669477707.766803791.346140.recscuba_google-huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #689209 |
Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: >>> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> RonB wrote: > [...] >>>>>>>> It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. >>>>>>>> Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting >>>>>>> reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. >>>>>> They're that far gone with this Woke stupidity. >>>>> >>>>> Have you been to Britain, RonB? >>>> >>>> Nope. But I can read. >>> >>> From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it >>> a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news? >> >> Are you going to deny that people have been jailed for posting memes >> in Britain? If so you better get hold of the British press and tell them, >> because they seem to be "confused" on the subject. > > At this moment I am neither denying nor confirming anything. > I asked you a question which you have not yet answered, RonB. Yeah, golly gee .. how about that? Seems that Ronny is afraid to look outside of his echo chamber. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-30 18:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dfc51kth5tcv8k5qvbmj4amq7bcginf9mg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #689209 |
Sn!pe wrote: >> > From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it >> > a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news? >> >> Are you going to deny that people have been jailed for posting memes >> in Britain? If so you better get hold of the British press and tell them, >> because they seem to be "confused" on the subject. > >At this moment I am neither denying nor confirming anything. >I asked you a question which you have not yet answered, RonB. > >When you've done that, kindly give chapter and verse about >"people have been jailed for posting memes in Britain". https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/free-speech-wobbles-uk https://freespeechunion.org/police-make-30-arrests-a-day-for-offensive-online-messages/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-19 07:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Q8MMP.704184$SVG3.147968@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #689204 |
On 4/18/25 17:01, Sn!pe wrote: > RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: >>> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> RonB wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate >>>>>> >>>>>> The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment >>>>>> recognizing only two genders ? male and female. The decision was >>>>>> supported by 140 lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no >>>>>> abstentions. >>>>>> >>>>>> The revised constitution states: >>>>>> >>>>>> "Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, >>>>>> and the family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either >>>>>> male or female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman." >>>>> >>>>> Strange that it even needs to be spelled-out, eh? >>>>> >>>>>> It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. >>>>>> Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision. >>>>> >>>>> That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting >>>>> reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed. >>>> >>>> I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. They're >>>> that far gone with this Woke stupidity. >>> >>> Have you been to Britain, RonB? >> >> Nope. But I can read. > > From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it > a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news? The "trustworthy," "authoritative" sources we are encouraged to use by our respective government always lie by omission. Here in Canada, CBC routinely removes details, as do CTV, Global and even the local LCN. The only way you will really know what's going on is if you get your news through a combination of the mainstream garbage and independent sources. You always have to use the latter to confirm. If you only rely on traditional broadcast or print news, you will always be grossly misinformed. Look at Stéphane, for example, he's been convinced that a "vaccine" that caused my sister-in-law, my best friend and her co-worker to develop uteran cancer and need to have their reproductive system is _safe_. He's telling us that the injection that caused the cousin of my former brother-in-law and his wife to develop cancer is helpful. The pharmaceutical industry was definitely not responsible for my wife's subordinate developing myocarditis requiring her to stay in the hospital for week and half! With such a brilliant perspective, it should be no wonder why France is quickly turning into yet another Muslim caliphate. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-19 14:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1rb1j9o.zzq8lhq828jhN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #689237 |
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 4/18/25 17:01, Sn!pe wrote: > > RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> RonB wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment > >>>>>> recognizing only two genders ? male and female. The decision was > >>>>>> supported by 140 lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no > >>>>>> abstentions. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The revised constitution states: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, > >>>>>> and the family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either > >>>>>> male or female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman." > >>>>> > >>>>> Strange that it even needs to be spelled-out, eh? > >>>>> > >>>>>> It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. > >>>>>> Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision. > >>>>> > >>>>> That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting > >>>>> reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed. > >>>> > >>>> I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. > >>>> They're that far gone with this Woke stupidity. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Have you been to Britain, RonB? > >>> > >> > >> Nope. But I can read. > >> > > > > From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it > > a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news? > > > > The "trustworthy," "authoritative" sources we are encouraged to use by > our respective government always lie by omission. Here in Canada, CBC > routinely removes details, as do CTV, Global and even the local LCN. The > only way you will really know what's going on is if you get your news through > a combination of the mainstream garbage and independent sources. > You always have to use the latter to confirm. > I always take all my news with a big pinch of salt, not to say a cynical, distrusting approach. I form my opinions by gleaning information from as many independent sources as I can, giving due weight to their reputation for trustworthiness. IMHO "Rebelnews" does not inspire trust. I abhor bigotry. > > If you only rely on traditional broadcast or print news, you will always > be grossly misinformed. Look at Stéphane, for example, he's been > convinced that a [what follows is irrelevant] > "vaccine" that caused my sister-in-law, my best friend and her co-worker > to develop uteran cancer and need to have their reproductive system is > _safe_. He's telling us that the injection that caused the cousin of my > former brother-in-law and his wife to develop cancer is helpful. The > pharmaceutical industry was definitely not responsible for my wife's > subordinate developing myocarditis requiring her to stay in the hospital > for week and half! > > With such a brilliant perspective, it should be no wonder why France is > quickly turning into yet another Muslim caliphate. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, PTB, FIBS My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-19 13:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3SQMP.377073$sbY2.250355@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #689246 |
On 4/19/25 09:36, Sn!pe wrote: > CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > >> On 4/18/25 17:01, Sn!pe wrote: >>> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> RonB wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment >>>>>>>> recognizing only two genders ? male and female. The decision was >>>>>>>> supported by 140 lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no >>>>>>>> abstentions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The revised constitution states: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, >>>>>>>> and the family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either >>>>>>>> male or female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Strange that it even needs to be spelled-out, eh? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. >>>>>>>> Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting >>>>>>> reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. >>>>>> They're that far gone with this Woke stupidity. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Have you been to Britain, RonB? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Nope. But I can read. >>>> >>> >>> From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it >>> a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news? >>> >> >> The "trustworthy," "authoritative" sources we are encouraged to use by >> our respective government always lie by omission. Here in Canada, CBC >> routinely removes details, as do CTV, Global and even the local LCN. The >> only way you will really know what's going on is if you get your news through >> a combination of the mainstream garbage and independent sources. >> You always have to use the latter to confirm. >> > > I always take all my news with a big pinch of salt, not to say a > cynical, distrusting approach. I form my opinions by gleaning > information from as many independent sources as I can, giving > due weight to their reputation for trustworthiness. > > IMHO "Rebelnews" does not inspire trust. > > I abhor bigotry. And I abhor cowards who worship at the alter of political correctness. < snip uninteresting perspective > -- God be with you, CrudeSausage LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-19 18:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1rb1v1h.19hiz9uuioh3bN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #689254 |
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: [...] > > I always take all my news with a big pinch of salt, not to say a > > cynical, distrusting approach. I form my opinions by gleaning > > information from as many independent sources as I can, giving > > due weight to their reputation for trustworthiness. > > > > IMHO "Rebelnews" does not inspire trust. > > > > I abhor bigotry. > > > > And I abhor cowards who worship at the alter of political correctness. > > < snip uninteresting perspective > > More rudeness. It's abundantly plain that your opinions are immovable so this exchange of views is at an end. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, PTB, FIBS My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web