Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #466267 > unrolled thread

Which programming language you feel most comfortable?

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 12:08 +0000
    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-08 14:07 +0000
      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 08:08 -0700
        Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 15:27 +0000
          Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 08:32 -0700
            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 16:10 +0000
          Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 10:54 -0700
        Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-08 10:09 -0700
    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-08 16:16 +0000
      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 16:18 +0000
        Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-08 16:57 +0000
          Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 17:31 +0000
            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-08 10:36 -0700
            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 10:42 -0700
              Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 17:48 +0000
                Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 10:57 -0700
                  Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 18:22 +0000
                Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-09 13:32 -0400
            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-08 18:30 +0000
              Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 18:39 +0000
                Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 11:43 -0700
                  Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 18:50 +0000
                    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 11:59 -0700
                      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 19:11 +0000
                        Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 12:12 -0700
                          Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 19:16 +0000
                    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-09 20:12 -0400
                      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 17:36 -0700
                  Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 18:53 +0000
                    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 18:57 +0000
                      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 12:08 -0700
                        Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-08 19:13 +0000
                        Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-08 19:19 +0000
                          Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 12:28 -0700
                            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 12:58 -0700
                            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 17:24 -0700
                          Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 14:01 -0700
                  Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-09 13:32 -0400
                    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 13:08 -0700
              Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-09 13:32 -0400
                Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 10:49 -0700
                Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-09 19:10 +0000
                  Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 13:26 -0700
                  Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-09 20:32 -0400
                    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 17:52 -0700
    Does Rust have #define ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-09 02:15 -0700
      Re: Does Rust have #define ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-09 12:48 +0000
        Re: Does Rust have #define ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 05:54 -0700
        I don't feel compelled to use Rust. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-09 11:43 -0700
          Re: I don't feel compelled to use Rust. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-10 00:11 +0000
    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-09 07:17 -0400
      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-09 11:49 +0000
        "SleepPat" in "X.CPP" in "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-09 11:54 -0700
        Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-10 05:29 -0400
          Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-10 09:07 -0500
            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 07:27 -0700
            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-10 19:25 -0400
          Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-10 16:07 +0000
            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-10 19:30 -0400
          Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-10 09:30 -0700
            Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-10 19:30 -0400
      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 05:07 -0700
    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Russian Election Hacker <Anatoly@hacker.ru.com> - 2018-09-09 17:23 -0400
      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 14:45 -0700
    Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-10 07:00 +0000
      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 00:24 -0700
      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-10 08:20 +0000
        Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 01:42 -0700
      Re: Which programming language you feel most comfortable? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-10 09:38 +0000

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#466495

On Sunday, September 9, 2018 at 10:33:18 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
> On 9/8/2018 2:30 PM, F. Russell wrote:
> 
> 
> > My entire Gentoo system, consisting of 496 packages, is written
> > entirely in C with a small percentage being in the extension language
> > known as C++.
> 
> 
> Portage is written in python.
> 
> "It [Portage] functions as the heart of Gentoo-based operating systems."
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Portage
> 
> Don't they know Linux doesn't have a heart, or a brain?  It's a virus.



Thanks to Steven Petruzzellis and his 'friends' you now need a whitelist. If people start trolling him again I will jump in... as I've always stated I would. I am referring to good people here, not trolls, who do not enter coalitions. 

And in response you have nothing but an attempt to start a troll-fest. Effectively everything Steven Petruzzellis says about anyone is false as everyone knows. Steven Petruzzellis's posts are nothing but an incomprehensible rambling. 

I suspect we have two different perspectives for a good reason. 

Both of those guys get their thrill out of provoking responses to their nonsense, which is the very definition of a troll. Having to deal with the use of Slrn is not what most want to do. 

--
Eight things to never feed your cat!
http://www.5z8.info/facebook-of-sex_w4l4wg_bomb
http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/BilkHelp.html
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466516

On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 13:32:40 -0400, DFS wrote:

> 
> Portage is written in python.
> 

Python is an interpreter that is written in C:

# file /usr/bin/python

ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, stripped

IOW, python is a C program.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466525

On Sunday, September 9, 2018 at 12:10:53 PM UTC-7, F. Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 13:32:40 -0400, DFS wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Portage is written in python.
> > 
> 
> Python is an interpreter that is written in C:
> 
> # file /usr/bin/python
> 
> ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
> interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, stripped
> 
> IOW, python is a C program.



It was Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh who forged me (and Desk Rabbit) and did not even try to hide it. I suspect Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh does not even know what is wrong with Xfce. The Mack has better media tools. Which just pisses Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh off. 

Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh suffers from waking lies so, to him, everything, even people ignoring him, are "libel". Who doesn't know this? 

Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh is far too idiotic to write a good script. The only scripting he's able to do is automating his trolling in this group. 



--
Get Rich Slow
http://www.5z8.info/-php-deactivate_phishing_filter-48-_e3m8dt_malicious-cookie
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/BVpdH5KOc6s
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466563

On 9/9/2018 3:10 PM, F. Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 13:32:40 -0400, DFS wrote:
> 
>>
>> Portage is written in python.
>>
> 
> Python is an interpreter that is written in C:
>
> # file /usr/bin/python
> 
> ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
> interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, stripped
> 
> IOW, python is a C program.



python is a language spec.  The reference interpreter CPython is in C, 
but there are also interpreters written in Java, .NET and python itself. 
  And a bunch of others

https://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonImplementations

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466566

On Sunday, September 9, 2018 at 5:33:38 PM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
> On 9/9/2018 3:10 PM, F. Russell wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 13:32:40 -0400, DFS wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >> Portage is written in python.
> >>
> > 
> > Python is an interpreter that is written in C:
> >
> > # file /usr/bin/python
> > 
> > ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
> > interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, stripped
> > 
> > IOW, python is a C program.
> 
> 
> 
> python is a language spec.  The reference interpreter CPython is in C, 
> but there are also interpreters written in Java, .NET and python itself. 
>   And a bunch of others
> 
> https://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonImplementations



You wishing for something does not make it true. 

I'm getting sick of the nonsense in here. I'm guessing the Mac cultist is unable to control his own actions. Yawn. Same old brain-dead trolls. Off Flooder Steve Carroll goes to the view in the teeming latrine of my rubbish bin. He is as incompetent as Flooder Steve Carroll. 

If Klaus Schadenfreude has 'b.txt' open in an application such as Atom and Flooder Steve Carroll wants to change its name to 'mack.pdf' via a preset script, Klaus Schadenfreude's suggestion might be OK, if only to make sure file names are not the same. Fuchsia runs on the Cinnamon kernel. So yeah, Cinnamon is mobile. Cinnamon is a super computer. Cinnamon is a server. Cinnamon is a desktop. Cinnamon is growing in market share. Given how regularly it is clear that Flooder Steve Carroll's post is some distortion of a statement Klaus Schadenfreude made which had been a drubbing on Flooder Steve Carroll for something he did which was stupid/fallacious/etc... its clearly a regular expression of Flooder Steve Carroll's ever-present distress for having been so repeatedly destroyed: Flooder Steve Carroll is obviously not able of taking heat. 



-- 
Eight things to never feed your cat
https://youtu.be/r7wys2JvBD0
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfkup/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than/=
https://youtu.be/qwb1Ez0GWMA
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466429 — Does Rust have #define ?

> I prefer Rust now.
> Haskell is beautiful but is more complex then C++ ;)
> Assembly yessssssssssssssss, but is it language?
> C always, simple and efficient.
> All in all, I think that Rust got it right.

Why ? what makes Rust different from "my" C++ ? 
Does it have #define ?

I often destroy temporary heaps instead of calling free(). 

I enjoyed your notes on screen tearing, by the way.
I once had problems viewing 4 k, 60 fps videos in High Contrast theme mode;
at first, I thought it was my CPU, or maybe my video decoder|renderer.

I think it was a Windows Update that solved it;
Windows was a bit behind the BleedingEdge hardware I was using at the time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466450 — Re: Does Rust have #define ?

On 2018-09-09, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>> I prefer Rust now.
>> Haskell is beautiful but is more complex then C++ ;)
>> Assembly yessssssssssssssss, but is it language?
>> C always, simple and efficient.
>> All in all, I think that Rust got it right.
>
> Why ? what makes Rust different from "my" C++ ? 
> Does it have #define ?

Rust has more powerful macros. You can introduce syntax
constructs with it.

eg if you want C++ for loop, you can add it:
~/.../examples/rust >>> cat for_loop.rs                                                                                                                                                            
macro_rules! for_loop{
    ((;;$(;$lbl:tt)*)$bl:block)=>{                               
        $($lbl:)* loop {$bl}       
    }; 
    ((;$cond:expr;$(;$lbl:tt)*)$bl:block)=>{                 
        $($lbl:)* while $cond {$bl}
    }; 
    ((;$cond:expr;$inc:expr$(;$lbl:tt)*)$bl:block)=>{
        $($lbl:)* while $cond {  
            $bl;                   
            $inc;
        }                      
    };                    
    (($($vars:stmt),*;$cond:expr;$inc:expr$(;$lbl:tt)*)$bl:block) => {{
        $(                             
            $vars;                  
        )*       
        $($lbl:)* while $cond {
            $bl;
            $inc;
        }
    }};           
}

fn main(){
    for_loop!((let mut a=0,let b=10,let mut c=2;a<b;{a+=c;c+=1}){
        println!("{} {} {}",a,b,c);
    });
    for_loop!((let (mut a,b,mut c)=(0,10,2);a<b;{a+=c;c+=1}){
        println!("{} {} {}",a,b,c);
    });
    let (mut a,b,mut c)=(0,10,2);
    for_loop!((;a<b;{a+=c;c+=1}){
        println!("{} {} {}",a,b,c);
    });
    for_loop!((;a>-20;;'outer){
        println!("outer");
        for_loop!((;;){
            println!("{} {} {}",a,b,c);
            if a < 1 { break 'outer}
            a-=c;
            continue 'outer;
        })
    })
}


>
> I often destroy temporary heaps instead of calling free(). 

You mean you have pool allocator?


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466451 — Re: Does Rust have #define ?

On Sunday, September 9, 2018 at 5:49:01 AM UTC-7, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On 2018-09-09, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> >> I prefer Rust now.
> >> Haskell is beautiful but is more complex then C++ ;)
> >> Assembly yessssssssssssssss, but is it language?
> >> C always, simple and efficient.
> >> All in all, I think that Rust got it right.
> >
> > Why ? what makes Rust different from "my" C++ ? 
> > Does it have #define ?
> 
> Rust has more powerful macros. You can introduce syntax
> constructs with it.
> 
> eg if you want C++ for loop, you can add it:
> ~/.../examples/rust >>> cat for_loop.rs                                                                                                                                                            
> macro_rules! for_loop{
>     ((;;$(;$lbl:tt)*)$bl:block)=>{                               
>         $($lbl:)* loop {$bl}       
>     }; 
>     ((;$cond:expr;$(;$lbl:tt)*)$bl:block)=>{                 
>         $($lbl:)* while $cond {$bl}
>     }; 
>     ((;$cond:expr;$inc:expr$(;$lbl:tt)*)$bl:block)=>{
>         $($lbl:)* while $cond {  
>             $bl;                   
>             $inc;
>         }                      
>     };                    
>     (($($vars:stmt),*;$cond:expr;$inc:expr$(;$lbl:tt)*)$bl:block) => {{
>         $(                             
>             $vars;                  
>         )*       
>         $($lbl:)* while $cond {
>             $bl;
>             $inc;
>         }
>     }};           
> }
> 
> fn main(){
>     for_loop!((let mut a=0,let b=10,let mut c=2;a<b;{a+=c;c+=1}){
>         println!("{} {} {}",a,b,c);
>     });
>     for_loop!((let (mut a,b,mut c)=(0,10,2);a<b;{a+=c;c+=1}){
>         println!("{} {} {}",a,b,c);
>     });
>     let (mut a,b,mut c)=(0,10,2);
>     for_loop!((;a<b;{a+=c;c+=1}){
>         println!("{} {} {}",a,b,c);
>     });
>     for_loop!((;a>-20;;'outer){
>         println!("outer");
>         for_loop!((;;){
>             println!("{} {} {}",a,b,c);
>             if a < 1 { break 'outer}
>             a-=c;
>             continue 'outer;
>         })
>     })
> }
> 
> 
> >
> > I often destroy temporary heaps instead of calling free(). 
> 
> You mean you have pool allocator?
> 
> 
> -- 
> press any key to continue or any other to quit...



Calls it "trolling" him, even though he proceeds to set in motion that exact standard. What do you get out of lying? Open source is only cost effective if your time has no value. 

I am working on a system which will show off how weak Gnome is. 

Did Jonas Eklundh Communication think that was clever? All that Jonas Eklundh Communication cares about is that Jonas Eklundh Communication gets to deal out his crank call and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Michael Glasser Snit is a real person on the other end of the phone is what gets him off. 



- 
One Smart Penny!
http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p
http://www.5z8.info/trojan_p4g1zy_how-to-skin-a-gerbil
http://www.macadvocacy.pw/2005/Nov/09/236626.html
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466508 — I don't feel compelled to use Rust.

> > Does Rust have #define ?
> 
> Rust has more powerful macros. 
> You can introduce syntax constructs with it.
> 
> e.g. if you want C++ for loop, you can add it;
> see "for_loop.rs":   macro_rules! for_loop{

Wow, I wasn't expecting that.
Still, I don't feel compelled to use it.

> > I often destroy temporary heaps instead of calling free(). 
> 
> You mean you have pool allocator?

I create a temporary heap,
allocate millions of items,
and then destroy it [ instead of calling free() ].

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466558 — Re: I don't feel compelled to use Rust.

On 2018-09-09, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>> 
>> You mean you have pool allocator?
>
> I create a temporary heap,
> allocate millions of items,
> and then destroy it [ instead of calling free() ].

That is what is done usually. I think it is called pool allocation.
look at apache pool and boost pool for example.

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466444

Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> I prefer Rust now.
> Haskell is beautiful but is more complex then C++ ;)
> Assembly yessssssssssssssss, but is it language?
> C always, simple and efficient.
> All in all, I think that Rust got it right.

C++ all the way babyyyy!

-- 
O, it is excellent
To have a giant's strength; but it is tyrannous
To use it like a giant.
		-- Shakespeare, "Measure for Measure", II, 2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466445

On 2018-09-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> I prefer Rust now.
>> Haskell is beautiful but is more complex then C++ ;)
>> Assembly yessssssssssssssss, but is it language?
>> C always, simple and efficient.
>> All in all, I think that Rust got it right.
>
> C++ all the way babyyyy!

Heh, that is what I do for living, little bit bored because of that ;)
>


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466512 — "SleepPat" in "X.CPP" in "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".

> > C++ all the way babyyyy!
> 
> Heh, that is what I do for living; 
> little bit bored because of that ;)

Last 2 Years, I've been OffLine  8.5 to 13.4  Hours/Day.

  Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.PNG    Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.HTM

  See "SleepPat" in "X.CPP" in "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466611

Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2018-09-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> I prefer Rust now.
>>> Haskell is beautiful but is more complex then C++ ;)
>>> Assembly yessssssssssssssss, but is it language?
>>> C always, simple and efficient.
>>> All in all, I think that Rust got it right.
>>
>> C++ all the way babyyyy!
>
> Heh, that is what I do for living, little bit bored because of that ;)

Heh, I spent a few months on a C# project.  It's not a bad language, but the
version churn is worse than Python, and they keep adding features that C++
has had for a long time.

I'm still catching up with C++14 and (sigh) C++17...

Sounds like DFS:

-- 
You will be a winner today.  Pick a fight with a four-year-old.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466635

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>Heh, I spent a few months on a C# project.  It's not a bad language, but the
>version churn is worse than Python, 

We're sticking with Python 2.x, where I work.

-- 
"That's nice, but free isn't a business model that puts breakfast
cereal on the table each morning to live.  So just what do you do to
eat?"  -  lying asshole "-hh"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466637

On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 7:07:57 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
> >Heh, I spent a few months on a C# project.  It's not a bad language, but the
> >version churn is worse than Python, 
> 
> We're sticking with Python 2.x, where I work.
> 
> -- 
> "That's nice, but free isn't a business model that puts breakfast
> cereal on the table each morning to live.  So just what do you do to
> eat?"  -  lying asshole "-hh"



Until or unless Sigmond offers up his 'preferable' Mac solution for appraisal, there is no competition, just wild assertions. It was Sigmond who flooded Desk Rabbit's site dozens of times and pretended he did not do it. 

Hint: You will not go into a party, guzzle all the liquor, screw all the boys, take the souvenirs and ralph in the john without being ridiculed. Contrary to Sigmond's claim that he has "no experience in making trouble" (a lie as illustrated by the fact that he hacked Desk Rabbit's Gmail account) he was quoted asking people how they would install a virus remotely. 

The whole buffonery is packed of unbelievable holes and relies heavily on Sigmond's 'psych degree' shenanigans. 

--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466731

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>Heh, I spent a few months on a C# project.  It's not a bad language, but the
>>version churn is worse than Python, 
>
> We're sticking with Python 2.x, where I work.

I've been wanting to learn about Python numerics and "big data", but...
so much to do.

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cf_JFo-TYI

   Lemon Jelly, "Only Time"

-- 
Q:	What do monsters eat?
A:	Things.
 
Q:	What do monsters drink?
A:	Coke.  (Because Things go better with Coke.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466660

On 2018-09-10, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2018-09-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> I prefer Rust now.
>>>> Haskell is beautiful but is more complex then C++ ;)
>>>> Assembly yessssssssssssssss, but is it language?
>>>> C always, simple and efficient.
>>>> All in all, I think that Rust got it right.
>>>
>>> C++ all the way babyyyy!
>>
>> Heh, that is what I do for living, little bit bored because of that ;)
>
> Heh, I spent a few months on a C# project.  It's not a bad language, but the
> version churn is worse than Python, and they keep adding features that C++
> has had for a long time.
>
> I'm still catching up with C++14 and (sigh) C++17...

I started using features from C++11 ;)
Boss allows me to port current project from MFC to Qt, and has no
problem if I port that to Linux eventually ;)

>
> Sounds like DFS:
>


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466732

Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2018-09-10, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2018-09-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> I prefer Rust now.
>>>>> Haskell is beautiful but is more complex then C++ ;)
>>>>> Assembly yessssssssssssssss, but is it language?
>>>>> C always, simple and efficient.
>>>>> All in all, I think that Rust got it right.
>>>>
>>>> C++ all the way babyyyy!
>>>
>>> Heh, that is what I do for living, little bit bored because of that ;)
>>
>> Heh, I spent a few months on a C# project.  It's not a bad language, but the
>> version churn is worse than Python, and they keep adding features that C++
>> has had for a long time.
>>
>> I'm still catching up with C++14 and (sigh) C++17...
>
> I started using features from C++11 ;)
> Boss allows me to port current project from MFC to Qt, and has no
> problem if I port that to Linux eventually ;)

I'm not a super fan of Qt, but it is very portable and complete.
Although I do strings in std::string and convert to QString only when
I have to.  You can't go too far wrong with Qt.

I have a fairly complex MIDI sequencer project on GitHub, originally written
for Gtkmm-2.4 (also a very good framework, but Gtk isn't quite as
Windows-friendly as I would like.)  The project can also be built as a Linux
daemon (no GUI) and a Qt 5 version that has nearly caught up to the Gtkmm
version.  It supports ALSA, JACK, and PortMidi.

-- 
Must I hold a candle to my shames?
		-- William Shakespeare, "The Merchant of Venice"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466662

On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 5:49:17 AM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> 
> I'm still catching up with C++14 and (sigh) C++17...
> 

Who is compensating you for your time spent in "catching up?" 

These programming sweat shops expect one to labor for the company
"on the clock" and then labor more in self-learning "off the clock."

What a deal!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web