Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #468142 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-22 09:36 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 618 — 38 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
somebody running Snit over in a rental pickup truck from Lowes would be viewed as solid community service Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 08:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 10:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 15:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 07:47 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:24 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 05:55 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:00 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 05:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
All educated people agree that Snit is the very definition of insanity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 05:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:10 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:48 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 05:39 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:50 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
"Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-30 07:13 -0700
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-30 20:14 -0700
Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:58 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 04:14 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:28 -0500
Mr. ChrisV, my publicist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 07:27 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:13 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:06 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:08 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:15 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:20 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:45 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:50 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:59 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:10 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:22 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:05 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 22:58 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:02 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:00 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:17 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:23 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:52 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:04 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:28 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 13:54 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:55 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:12 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:45 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 18:12 -0700
Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:55 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 12:07 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:35 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:38 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:58 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:07 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:15 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:15 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:51 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 22:57 +0000
Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:57 -0700
Re: Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 07:42 -0700
Re: Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 07:52 -0700
Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 13:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:39 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:23 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:47 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:46 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 16:05 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:41 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 13:47 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:53 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:07 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:10 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:29 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:43 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:04 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 17:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:43 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 10:03 -0500
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 17:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 02:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 04:13 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 03:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 04:45 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:27 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
Re: The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:34 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 07:21 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:48 -0700
Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 21:44 -0700
Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:03 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:42 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 21:22 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
"IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:19 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 03:38 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 10:54 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:37 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:55 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:51 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
Democratic Socialists are Tards ... Just thought that the COLA Fruits might want to know Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:59 -0700
Re: Democratic Socialists are Tards ... Just thought that the COLA Fruits might want to know Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:17 -0700
Second verse, same as the first ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:26 -0700
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 09:50 -0400
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:38 +0000
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 08:02 -0700
Second verse, same as the first ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 09:20 -0700
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 09:36 -0700
Page 11 of 31 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 31 Next page →
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. |
| Message-ID | <6mlsqd13vhgtil6db3ibpki0ald62h35hv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #469263 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:26:45 GMT, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >For Jeff Relf, resident playboy, that's easier said than done. He just >can't keep the women away. The only women who can't stay away from Jeff are dental hygienists who are fascinated by the mess in his mouth. Amazed that gangrene hasn't set in. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ÂŪ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700 |
| Subject | I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.28--9.38am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #469263 |
> For Jeff Relf, resident playboy, that's easier said than done. > He just can't keep the women away. I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Pretty women turn down guys several times a day, everyday. Who, among us, turns down a woman ?! No one, it never happens.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. |
| Message-ID | <8cmsqdhc9b85hcqqtkuq5he9ivlm0226la@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #469271 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:38:57 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >> For Jeff Relf, resident playboy, that's easier said than done. >> He just can't keep the women away. > >I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. >Pretty women turn down guys several times a day, everyday. >Who, among us, turns down a woman ?! No one, it never happens. I can't think of a man in these groups who hasn't turned down kensi and Nadegda, time after time... -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ÂŪ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. |
| Message-ID | <1nvuqhe.1uy87d914rpy7wN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #469274 |
Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> correctly stated: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:38:57 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > > >> For Jeff Relf, resident playboy, that's easier said than done. > >> He just can't keep the women away. > > > >I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. > >Pretty women turn down guys several times a day, everyday. > >Who, among us, turns down a woman ?! No one, it never happens. > > I can't think of a man in these groups who hasn't > turned down kensi and Nadegda, time after time... Eww, pass the mindbleach. -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just shuddered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. |
| Message-ID | <pom1gq$14t9$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #469271 |
On 9/28/2018 12:38 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> For Jeff Relf, resident playboy, that's easier said than done. >> He just can't keep the women away. > > I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. > Pretty women turn down guys several times a day, everyday. > Who, among us, turns down a woman ?! No one, it never happens. > "Never" is too strong a word, Rolf. Yes, I know that men are the reason there are laws against having sex with corpses, but allow me to point out that you have never viewed Nads or "kensi" in person!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. |
| Message-ID | <GjxrD.123217$LK2.46728@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #469271 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:38:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> For Jeff Relf, resident playboy, that's easier said than done. >> He just can't keep the women away. > > I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Pretty women > turn down guys several times a day, everyday. Who, among us, turns down > a woman ?! No one, it never happens. I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. |
| Message-ID | <pom7q7$kth$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469330 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 21:47:18 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:38:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>> For Jeff Relf, resident playboy, that's easier said than done. >>> He just can't keep the women away. >> >> I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Pretty women >> turn down guys several times a day, everyday. Who, among us, turns down >> a woman ?! No one, it never happens. > > I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. I'm sure your wife would be pleased. Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700 |
| Subject | If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.28--3.04pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #469332 |
> > I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. > > I'm sure your wife would be pleased. > Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. > Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), a hideous woman _ might hit on me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <9h9tqdtnje2rpjtvba6datlv9fvfkq09pm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #469333 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >> > I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >> >> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. > >If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >a hideous woman _ might hit on me. Watch out for pandora... in alt.checkmate. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ÂŪ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <kDxrD.123220$LK2.53520@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #469333 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> > I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >> >> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. > > If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), > a hideous woman _ might hit on me. Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers that it could be just about anyone. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <pom8st$u2u$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469337 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>> > I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>> >>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >> >> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. > > Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers > that it could be just about anyone. Twas I, liar :) LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <bkj0sq.el0.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #469340 |
On 2018-09-28 3:10 PM, Brick wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >>>>> I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>>> >>>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >>> >>> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >>> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. >> >> Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers >> that it could be just about anyone. > > Twas I, liar :) > LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. > one canadian not canadians
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <pombg4$d3o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469352 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:52:39 -0700, %, thunk thusly: > On 2018-09-28 3:10 PM, Brick wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: >>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>>>>> I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>>>> >>>>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>>>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>>>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >>>> >>>> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >>>> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. >>> >>> Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers >>> that it could be just about anyone. >> >> Twas I, liar :) >> LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. >> > one canadian not canadians Then deport him -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <bkj1bt.el0.17.11@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #469353 |
On 2018-09-28 3:55 PM, Brick wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:52:39 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >> On 2018-09-28 3:10 PM, Brick wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: >>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>>>>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>>>>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >>>>> >>>>> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >>>>> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. >>>> >>>> Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers >>>> that it could be just about anyone. >>> >>> Twas I, liar :) >>> LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. >>> >> one canadian not canadians > > Then deport him > is a no my jub
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <pomc2t$fng$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469354 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:00:42 -0700, %, thunk thusly: > On 2018-09-28 3:55 PM, Brick wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:52:39 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>> On 2018-09-28 3:10 PM, Brick wrote: >>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: >>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>>>>>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>>>>>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >>>>>> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. >>>>> >>>>> Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers >>>>> that it could be just about anyone. >>>> >>>> Twas I, liar :) >>>> LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. >>>> >>> one canadian not canadians >> >> Then deport him >> > is a no my jub is a tuff, neber ending jub -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <bkj28b.2tf.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #469355 |
On 2018-09-28 4:05 PM, Brick wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:00:42 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >> On 2018-09-28 3:55 PM, Brick wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:52:39 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>>> On 2018-09-28 3:10 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: >>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>>>>>>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>>>>>>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >>>>>>> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers >>>>>> that it could be just about anyone. >>>>> >>>>> Twas I, liar :) >>>>> LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. >>>>> >>>> one canadian not canadians >>> >>> Then deport him >>> >> is a no my jub > > is a tuff, neber ending jub > so i'm a no gonna do wit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <pomd47$fng$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469356 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:15:53 -0700, %, thunk thusly: > On 2018-09-28 4:05 PM, Brick wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:00:42 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>> On 2018-09-28 3:55 PM, Brick wrote: >>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:52:39 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>>>> On 2018-09-28 3:10 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: >>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>>>>>>>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>>>>>>>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >>>>>>>> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers >>>>>>> that it could be just about anyone. >>>>>> >>>>>> Twas I, liar :) >>>>>> LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. >>>>>> >>>>> one canadian not canadians >>>> >>>> Then deport him >>>> >>> is a no my jub >> >> is a tuff, neber ending jub >> > so i'm a no gonna do wit I ain da gonna blaim a ya, Luweejee. Go an a fite a pola barre. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <bkj2o6.2tf.19.9@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #469357 |
On 2018-09-28 4:22 PM, Brick wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:15:53 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >> On 2018-09-28 4:05 PM, Brick wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:00:42 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>>> On 2018-09-28 3:55 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:52:39 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>>>>> On 2018-09-28 3:10 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>>>>>>>>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>>>>>>>>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >>>>>>>>> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers >>>>>>>> that it could be just about anyone. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Twas I, liar :) >>>>>>> LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. >>>>>>> >>>>>> one canadian not canadians >>>>> >>>>> Then deport him >>>>> >>>> is a no my jub >>> >>> is a tuff, neber ending jub >>> >> so i'm a no gonna do wit > > I ain da gonna blaim a ya, Luweejee. > Go an a fite a pola barre. > is a no polar here go nort
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <pomdfa$fng$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469358 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:24:20 -0700, %, thunk thusly: > On 2018-09-28 4:22 PM, Brick wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:15:53 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>> On 2018-09-28 4:05 PM, Brick wrote: >>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:00:42 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>>>> On 2018-09-28 3:55 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:52:39 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>>>>>> On 2018-09-28 3:10 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>>>>>>>>>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>>>>>>>>>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >>>>>>>>>> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers >>>>>>>>> that it could be just about anyone. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Twas I, liar :) >>>>>>>> LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> one canadian not canadians >>>>>> >>>>>> Then deport him >>>>>> >>>>> is a no my jub >>>> >>>> is a tuff, neber ending jub >>>> >>> so i'm a no gonna do wit >> >> I ain da gonna blaim a ya, Luweejee. >> Go an a fite a pola barre. >> > is a no polar here go nort Aska dem to cum back souf, tella dem de gloeb e be a warmen, an dat 'e need to fite wit joo. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: If I were super attractive... |
| Message-ID | <bkj35o.2tf.19.12@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #469359 |
On 2018-09-28 4:28 PM, Brick wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:24:20 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >> On 2018-09-28 4:22 PM, Brick wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:15:53 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>>> On 2018-09-28 4:05 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:00:42 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>>>>> On 2018-09-28 3:55 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:52:39 -0700, %, thunk thusly: >>>>>>>> On 2018-09-28 3:10 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:08:16 GMT, SilverSlimer, thunk thusly: >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:04:47 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I work with some hideous women. I'd turn them down without a thought. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure your wife would be pleased. >>>>>>>>>>>> Being you're a proud Catholic and all. Jackass. Liar. >>>>>>>>>>>> Your a fuckin bored Canadian, that's what you are. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If I were super attractive ( I'm not, far from it ), >>>>>>>>>>> a hideous woman _ might hit on me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Out of curiosity, who wrote the post you quoted? I filter so many losers >>>>>>>>>> that it could be just about anyone. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Twas I, liar :) >>>>>>>>> LOL at Canadians... calling "others" losers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> one canadian not canadians >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then deport him >>>>>>> >>>>>> is a no my jub >>>>> >>>>> is a tuff, neber ending jub >>>>> >>>> so i'm a no gonna do wit >>> >>> I ain da gonna blaim a ya, Luweejee. >>> Go an a fite a pola barre. >>> >> is a no polar here go nort > > Aska dem to cum back souf, tella dem de gloeb e be a warmen, an dat 'e > need to fite wit joo. > you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 31 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 31 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web