Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #467242 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-15 16:12 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-09-15 18:36 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 207 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-15 16:12 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 12:04 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-15 18:02 -0400
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-15 18:11 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 19:22 -0700
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-16 11:24 +0000
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-16 13:00 -0400
Re: a little bit closer "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-16 20:39 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-16 21:04 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 14:33 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 08:55 -0700
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 09:09 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 10:03 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 13:01 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 10:20 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 13:55 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:02 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 11:48 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 16:29 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:49 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 14:15 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 17:14 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 14:28 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 19:26 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 16:46 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 21:43 -0400
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 22:03 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 19:11 -0700
(Sub)Threads drift, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-17 20:23 -0700
(Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-17 19:29 -0700
Re: (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents). DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 23:12 -0400
Re: (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 20:29 -0700
20 years hard labor, sans food. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-17 21:58 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 14:46 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 19:45 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 19:46 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 11:48 -0700
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 21:47 +0000
Re: a little bit closer "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-17 22:53 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:57 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-19 09:47 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-09-16 23:19 +0200
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 14:48 -0700
Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-17 11:42 -0500
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 16:37 -0400
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 23:37 +0000
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 21:24 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 18:55 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 13:19 -0400
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 10:35 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 16:31 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:59 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 10:52 -0700
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 12:03 -0700
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 12:26 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 16:20 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:42 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 22:10 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 19:26 -0700
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 06:58 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 07:28 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-18 22:11 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 19:33 -0700
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-19 05:53 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-19 09:33 -0400
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-19 06:52 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 08:36 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:29 -0700
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-19 08:39 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 09:08 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 13:32 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 09:27 -0400
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-22 15:01 +0000
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 20:47 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:01 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:18 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:41 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:47 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:12 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-23 00:21 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:02 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:59 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 11:21 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-23 14:43 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 12:28 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 12:56 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 16:04 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 17:07 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-24 09:20 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 06:43 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 14:18 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-23 19:30 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 16:51 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 20:15 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 17:04 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-24 09:26 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 06:58 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:56 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-24 12:33 -0400
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-24 12:44 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 10:54 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 11:39 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0400
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-25 14:26 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:00 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-26 19:40 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:40 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 11:13 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-25 13:11 -0400
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-24 07:53 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 09:03 -0700
Re: a little bit closer "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-24 22:32 +0000
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-25 12:04 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:25 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 21:05 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:00 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:34 -0700
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-19 22:04 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 15:22 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-20 23:55 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-21 04:02 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-21 06:54 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-21 13:31 +0200
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 04:52 -0700
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-21 16:07 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 10:53 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 04:37 -0700
Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 07:24 -0500
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 12:45 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:47 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:51 -0700
Re: a little bit closer RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:47 +0000
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 20:13 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:30 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:06 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:01 -0700
Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:33 -0500
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 06:11 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:54 -0700
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 12:41 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:48 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-22 07:08 -0400
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:36 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-23 08:35 -0400
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 13:58 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 07:41 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-23 07:47 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-23 10:34 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-23 07:44 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 08:13 -0700
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-22 14:51 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-23 08:39 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:43 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 14:01 -0700
Re: a little bit closer RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:51 +0000
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 20:13 +0000
Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:45 -0500
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:51 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 13:55 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:16 -0700
Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 12:31 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 06:41 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:50 -0700
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-21 16:01 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 10:45 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:09 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 22:56 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 08:55 -0400
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-22 14:51 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-23 08:42 -0400
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-21 14:03 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:38 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:44 -0700
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-22 03:04 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 20:20 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:01 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 09:54 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-20 14:58 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 12:41 -0700
Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 07:09 -0500
Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-19 05:58 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 06:14 -0700
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:31 +0000
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:12 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 10:44 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 14:06 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-18 23:05 -0400
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-19 04:17 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:54 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-19 09:02 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 06:30 -0700
Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-19 22:08 +0000
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 15:37 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-20 23:59 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-21 04:03 +0000
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-21 00:50 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:03 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:19 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 22:42 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:34 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:28 -0700
Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-15 19:24 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 16:32 -0700
Re: a little bit closer Special Edd <shortbus1963me@mail.com> - 2018-09-15 19:48 -0400
Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 18:36 -0700
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 14:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0bb03a24-8936-4da1-816a-1b28ac65d760@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467635 |
On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 1:49:08 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 2:30:11 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > > On 9/17/2018 2:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:57:50 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > > >> On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > > >> > > >>> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed > > >>> of... > > >> > > >> > > >> I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M posts. > > >> > > >> The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. > > > > > > LOL! Yeah, I have been slacking, haven't I? ;) > > > > > > How many times is it in there as posted by me (as opposed to a forgery)? > > > > > > 107x by "Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" in the last 5 years > > > > search Sep 18 2013 to Sep 17 2018 > > > > To get the list I did a search on 'BaJoRi:', the 8th entry and a unique > > word that probably didn't overcount. Of course I didn't view every post > > to confirm it contains the full Snitlist. > > How long did the search take? > > > You often enough felt compelled to post it multiple times a day (4x on > > 2015-08-18). The mental illness is strong. > > LOL! The goal was once a week so I missed it by a mile ;) Prescott Computer Guy asked to be rated according to objective trolling criteria, which Sandman accommodated. Thus, my earliest statement stands proper and correct. Why the requirement to recode into WebAssembly via Tmux in a desktop system? Predictably, Prescott Computer Guy didn't define this as part of his self-serving 'test' <whatever>. In fact Prescott Computer Guy's lies became directed at me. So as might be expected I regret sending hardware to Prescott Computer Guy. While I am sure his shills loved it, I've not helped the situation at all. The cult-like herd of convenient friends value being like everyone else instead of choice. Hint: You will not go into a cult meeting, gulp down all the hard stuff, sexually assault all the children, lift the nicknacks and vomit in the lap of Sandman without being told to leave. You're clueless! -- Eight things to never feed your dog!! http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 17:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uRUnD.17699$oH2.14659@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #467635 |
On 9/17/2018 4:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 2:30:11 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >> On 9/17/2018 2:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:57:50 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>> On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>> >>>>> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed >>>>> of... >>>> >>>> >>>> I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M posts. >>>> >>>> The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. >>> >>> LOL! Yeah, I have been slacking, haven't I? ;) >>> >>> How many times is it in there as posted by me (as opposed to a forgery)? >> >> >> 107x by "Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" in the last 5 years >> >> search Sep 18 2013 to Sep 17 2018 >> >> To get the list I did a search on 'BaJoRi:', the 8th entry and a unique >> word that probably didn't overcount. Of course I didn't view every post >> to confirm it contains the full Snitlist. > > How long did the search take? 0.32 seconds https://imgur.com/a/cLJ2Hse But first I perused a Snitlist to find a unique word that would limit 'false positives'. >> You often enough felt compelled to post it multiple times a day (4x on >> 2015-08-18). The mental illness is strong. > > LOL! The goal was once a week so I missed it by a mile ;) I suppose it's worth having around, maybe in an unofficial cola FAQ even. It does make for an interesting read.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 14:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6e892106-1dbc-43ab-88f5-9a9819fd82d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467638 |
On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 3:17:17 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 9/17/2018 4:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 2:30:11 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >> On 9/17/2018 2:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:57:50 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >>>> On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed > >>>>> of... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M posts. > >>>> > >>>> The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. > >>> > >>> LOL! Yeah, I have been slacking, haven't I? ;) > >>> > >>> How many times is it in there as posted by me (as opposed to a forgery)? > >> > >> > >> 107x by "Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" in the last 5 years > >> > >> search Sep 18 2013 to Sep 17 2018 > >> > >> To get the list I did a search on 'BaJoRi:', the 8th entry and a unique > >> word that probably didn't overcount. Of course I didn't view every post > >> to confirm it contains the full Snitlist. > > > > How long did the search take? > > > 0.32 seconds And that's searching data all the way back to 2003, right? IOW, even though there are only entries from 2013 and beyond, it still had to search back to 2003? > https://imgur.com/a/cLJ2Hse > > But first I perused a Snitlist to find a unique word that would limit > 'false positives'. That's probably the best word to use for this.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 19:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <QKWnD.52878$ql2.40813@fx06.iad> |
| In reply to | #467640 |
On 9/17/2018 5:28 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 3:17:17 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >> On 9/17/2018 4:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 2:30:11 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>> On 9/17/2018 2:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:57:50 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>>>> On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed >>>>>>> of... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M posts. >>>>>> >>>>>> The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. >>>>> >>>>> LOL! Yeah, I have been slacking, haven't I? ;) >>>>> >>>>> How many times is it in there as posted by me (as opposed to a forgery)? >>>> >>>> >>>> 107x by "Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" in the last 5 years >>>> >>>> search Sep 18 2013 to Sep 17 2018 >>>> >>>> To get the list I did a search on 'BaJoRi:', the 8th entry and a unique >>>> word that probably didn't overcount. Of course I didn't view every post >>>> to confirm it contains the full Snitlist. >>> >>> How long did the search take? >> >> >> 0.32 seconds > > And that's searching data all the way back to 2003, right? IOW, even though > there are only entries from 2013 and beyond, it still had to search back to 2003? No. The code builds a SQL statement using the dates on the screen: SELECT columns FROM tables WHERE utcdate between '2013-09-18' and '2018-09-17' So the db engine only considers those 5 years of data. Your first cola post shows as Jan 16 2004, and if I use that as a start date, still searching for 'bajori:', it takes 0.40 seconds and returns 126 hits. Your first post of the Snitlist in cola was Sep 22 2009 <1a78f6af-ec79-42d0-95b1-5aa034afedda@z28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> >> https://imgur.com/a/cLJ2Hse >> >> But first I perused a Snitlist to find a unique word that would limit >> 'false positives'. > > That's probably the best word to use for this. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 16:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <04d7ec5e-aff2-4cff-9cd1-0d0232c8dbd2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467668 |
On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 5:26:42 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 9/17/2018 5:28 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 3:17:17 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >> On 9/17/2018 4:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 2:30:11 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >>>> On 9/17/2018 2:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:57:50 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >>>>>> On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed > >>>>>>> of... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M posts. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. > >>>>> > >>>>> LOL! Yeah, I have been slacking, haven't I? ;) > >>>>> > >>>>> How many times is it in there as posted by me (as opposed to a forgery)? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 107x by "Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" in the last 5 years > >>>> > >>>> search Sep 18 2013 to Sep 17 2018 > >>>> > >>>> To get the list I did a search on 'BaJoRi:', the 8th entry and a unique > >>>> word that probably didn't overcount. Of course I didn't view every post > >>>> to confirm it contains the full Snitlist. > >>> > >>> How long did the search take? > >> > >> > >> 0.32 seconds > > > > And that's searching data all the way back to 2003, right? IOW, even though > > there are only entries from 2013 and beyond, it still had to search back to 2003? > > No. The code builds a SQL statement using the dates on the screen: > > SELECT columns > FROM tables > WHERE utcdate between '2013-09-18' and '2018-09-17' I never saw this query (if you posted it anywhere), I just assumed you were searching all years. > So the db engine only considers those 5 years of data. > > Your first cola post shows as Jan 16 2004, and if I use that as a start > date, still searching for 'bajori:', it takes 0.40 seconds and returns > 126 hits. > > Your first post of the Snitlist in cola was Sep 22 2009 > <1a78f6af-ec79-42d0-95b1-5aa034afedda@z28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> > > > > > >> https://imgur.com/a/cLJ2Hse > >> > >> But first I perused a Snitlist to find a unique word that would limit > >> 'false positives'. > > > > That's probably the best word to use for this. > > :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 21:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6LYnD.42751$ZJ2.19927@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #467675 |
On 9/17/2018 7:46 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 5:26:42 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >> No. The code builds a SQL statement using the dates on the screen: >> >> SELECT columns >> FROM tables >> WHERE utcdate between '2013-09-18' and '2018-09-17' > > I never saw this query (if you posted it anywhere), I just assumed you were > searching all years. I guess technically the query engine has to scan the entire table to find dates within the range, but it uses an index (if available) so it's very quick to eliminate the other years/values. Earlier I wrote a query to look for broken references in a thread (shitv and Agent was a culprit, as were you/Google Groups, and maybe others). https://imgur.com/a/rlKX6xd You can see how important indexing and primary keys are to the query plan created by the db engine. https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computer-programming/sql/relational-queries-in-sql/a/more-efficient-sql-with-query-planning-and-optimization
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 22:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <z2ZnD.180399$YL3.96748@fx48.iad> |
| In reply to | #467695 |
On 9/17/2018 9:43 PM, DFS wrote: > Earlier I wrote a query to look for broken references in a thread (shitv > and Agent was a culprit, as were you/Google Groups, and maybe others). > > https://imgur.com/a/rlKX6xd The results of that query show where shitv's lousy newsreader dropped the first (and most important) reference. https://imgur.com/a/DRYrKGx Every post in the thread (excepting the initiating post) should have <pl9b003a.se3veyk13@rooftop.invalid> as the first Reference (the column named 'Top MsgID'). Once you lose that, you have to do more work to find all the posts in the thread. I don't want to do more work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 19:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2091f190-78d8-4064-82b5-9952a692a114@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467698 |
On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 7:04:17 PM UTC-7, DFS wrote: > On 9/17/2018 9:43 PM, DFS wrote: > > > > Earlier I wrote a query to look for broken references in a thread (shitv > > and Agent was a culprit, as were you/Google Groups, and maybe others). > > > > https://imgur.com/a/rlKX6xd > > > The results of that query show where shitv's lousy newsreader dropped > the first (and most important) reference. > > https://imgur.com/a/DRYrKGx > > Every post in the thread (excepting the initiating post) should have > <pl9b003a.se3veyk13@rooftop.invalid> as the first Reference (the column > named 'Top MsgID'). Once you lose that, you have to do more work to > find all the posts in the thread. I don't want to do more work. Nearly all posters in this forum do programming either as a hobby or as a profession, so I think it unlikely anyone here consider automation to be "voodoo". Seriously, those of you who troll are not able to control Klaus Schadenfreude anymore. All that matters is that Snit 'The Moron' Glasser gets to impart his poorly written flyer and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Klaus Schadenfreude is an involuntary target on the other end of the phone is what gets him off. -- Top Six Ways Snit 'The Moron' Glasser Trolls! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.mac.system/6m_7Z7rQ6Hg Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 20:23 -0700 |
| Subject | (Sub)Threads drift, big time. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.17--8.23pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #467698 |
MrDFS _ fails to realize: (Sub)Threads drift, big time. The parent, and grandparent, and great great grandparent, and great great great grandparent _ might be relevant, if you're lucky. (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents); the result is _ stored in the "References:" line.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 19:29 -0700 |
| Subject | (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents). |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.17--7.29pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #467695 |
MrDFS doesn't know how the "References:" line works. I explained it to him before, recently, but he's not listening. The _ only thing you need in your "References:" and "In-Reply-To:" lines is the post that you are replying to; -- Nothing else is trustworthy, much less required. (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents); the result is _ stored in the "References:" line.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 23:12 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents). |
| Message-ID | <o3_nD.128751$tK2.77838@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #467703 |
On 9/17/2018 10:29 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > MrDFS doesn't know how the "References:" line works. Of course I do - and I understand you intentionally break threading for ... what reason? > I explained it to him before, recently, but he's not listening. > > The _ only thing you need in your "References:" and > "In-Reply-To:" lines is the post that you are replying to; > -- Nothing else is trustworthy, much less required. That's your claim, but your References line in this post I'm responding to is: <0fa16ec0-49cb-44d1-8ef3-97321c9c756c@googlegroups.com> <uRUnD.17699$oH2.14659@fx10.iad> <6e892106-1dbc-43ab-88f5-9a9819fd82d8@googlegroups.com> <QKWnD.52878$ql2.40813@fx06.iad> <04d7ec5e-aff2-4cff-9cd1-0d0232c8dbd2@googlegroups.com> <6LYnD.42751$ZJ2.19927@fx33.iad> Why? If you followed your own advice it would contain only the last one: <6LYnD.42751$ZJ2.19927@fx33.iad> Also, it's ALL trustworthy if the newsreader adheres to the RFC standards, which is exceedingly simple to do. 2.2.5 at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1036 <quote> If the original message does have a "References" line, the follow-up message should have a "References" line containing the text of the original "References" line, a blank, and the Message-ID of the original message. </quote> It's not reasonable to carry forward dozens or hundreds of references, of course, so at the very least keep the first messageID (the top level post), and the last messageID (the one you're responding to). Instead, you and other malcontents (including sloppy newsreaders) drop the first reference, causing me and every other newsreader more work. In all the posts I've captured, the largest reference line is 43 msg-IDs Threading issues are one of the few weaknesses of Usenet. Far more intrusive are forging and group flooding. But those are the price you pay for openness, anonmyity and lack of censorship. > (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents); > the result is _ stored in the "References:" line. You've seen pics of my newsreader, but I recently added the ability to Reply and generate New Posts. It's a hack between Access (construct the post) and python (send it). But it works. While I'm thinking about it: you recently said you weighed 240 or 245 (as I recall). That's 50% bigger than you were some years ago. Are you trying to eat yourself to death? My brother tried to, but hasn't died yet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 20:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents). |
| Message-ID | <5f8d12b5-6f75-4273-a611-0b5f0021b391@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467714 |
On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 8:13:26 PM UTC-7, DFS wrote: > On 9/17/2018 10:29 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > > MrDFS doesn't know how the "References:" line works. > > Of course I do - and I understand you intentionally break threading for > ... what reason? > > > > > I explained it to him before, recently, but he's not listening. > > > > The _ only thing you need in your "References:" and > > "In-Reply-To:" lines is the post that you are replying to; > > -- Nothing else is trustworthy, much less required. > > > That's your claim, but your References line in this post I'm responding > to is: > > <0fa16ec0-49cb-44d1-8ef3-97321c9c756c@googlegroups.com> > <uRUnD.17699$oH2.14659@fx10.iad> > <6e892106-1dbc-43ab-88f5-9a9819fd82d8@googlegroups.com> > <QKWnD.52878$ql2.40813@fx06.iad> > <04d7ec5e-aff2-4cff-9cd1-0d0232c8dbd2@googlegroups.com> > <6LYnD.42751$ZJ2.19927@fx33.iad> > > Why? > > If you followed your own advice it would contain only the last one: > <6LYnD.42751$ZJ2.19927@fx33.iad> > > > Also, it's ALL trustworthy if the newsreader adheres to the RFC > standards, which is exceedingly simple to do. > > 2.2.5 at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1036 > <quote> > If the original message does have a "References" line, the follow-up > message should have a "References" line containing the text of the > original "References" line, a blank, and the Message-ID of the original > message. > </quote> > > It's not reasonable to carry forward dozens or hundreds of references, > of course, so at the very least keep the first messageID (the top level > post), and the last messageID (the one you're responding to). > > Instead, you and other malcontents (including sloppy newsreaders) drop > the first reference, causing me and every other newsreader more work. > > In all the posts I've captured, the largest reference line is 43 msg-IDs > > Threading issues are one of the few weaknesses of Usenet. Far more > intrusive are forging and group flooding. But those are the price you > pay for openness, anonmyity and lack of censorship. > > > > (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents); > > the result is _ stored in the "References:" line. > > You've seen pics of my newsreader, but I recently added the ability to > Reply and generate New Posts. It's a hack between Access (construct the > post) and python (send it). But it works. > > While I'm thinking about it: you recently said you weighed 240 or 245 > (as I recall). That's 50% bigger than you were some years ago. Are you > trying to eat yourself to death? My brother tried to, but hasn't died yet. With all the crowing Klaus 'Super Troll' Schadenfreude has done on this topic, the 'Top Programmer' doesn't know how to do this. It takes a couple seconds to click and drag across a sentence and 'reverse' it. Having to tolerate the use of Bash would just confuse the general user. Only what Klaus 'Super Troll' Schadenfreude wants matters to Klaus 'Super Troll' Schadenfreude. There is nothing you or I can do to change that. It's a medical issue and it is what it is. - "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 21:58 -0700 |
| Subject | 20 years hard labor, sans food. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.17--9.58pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #467714 |
I'd rather live 10 years, eating what I want, in bed, than do 20 years hard labor, sans food. > you and other malcontents (including sloppy newsreaders) drop > the first reference, causing me and every other newsreader more work. The "References:" line is what it is, not what you want it to be. I don't care about the great great great great great great grandpa; sorry. Often, I only care about the parent, not the GrandParent. I see the ReBuilt "References:" line; to wit: Jeff-Relf.Me/Posts.TXT And I'm _ not afraid to include people from other NewsGroups. > forging and group flooding. I know who's who, forgeries don't bother me, I read the best posts first, and I filter out the spam; see: Jeff-Relf.Me/Cola_Regs.HTM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 14:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d0c5705a-10d7-4750-aa25-3046cfe0ae3f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467638 |
On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 2:17:17 PM UTC-7, DFS wrote: > On 9/17/2018 4:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 2:30:11 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >> On 9/17/2018 2:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:57:50 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >>>> On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed > >>>>> of... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M posts. > >>>> > >>>> The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. > >>> > >>> LOL! Yeah, I have been slacking, haven't I? ;) > >>> > >>> How many times is it in there as posted by me (as opposed to a forgery)? > >> > >> > >> 107x by "Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" in the last 5 years > >> > >> search Sep 18 2013 to Sep 17 2018 > >> > >> To get the list I did a search on 'BaJoRi:', the 8th entry and a unique > >> word that probably didn't overcount. Of course I didn't view every post > >> to confirm it contains the full Snitlist. > > > > How long did the search take? > > > 0.32 seconds > > https://imgur.com/a/cLJ2Hse > > But first I perused a Snitlist to find a unique word that would limit > 'false positives'. > > > > > >> You often enough felt compelled to post it multiple times a day (4x on > >> 2015-08-18). The mental illness is strong. > > > > LOL! The goal was once a week so I missed it by a mile ;) > > > I suppose it's worth having around, maybe in an unofficial cola FAQ > even. It does make for an interesting read. I have a little script I use as well, but it's better than yours. Having to endure the use of LXQt is too much for RonB (aka ronb) to deal with. RonB (aka ronb) should know everyone knows he is just lying. So what is RonB (aka ronb)'s system for the flooding crap? Access? That is the only database he knows, at least that I have seen. He must be using it to create these stupid "group-killer" threads. Best conjecture, RonB (aka ronb) took some code that he stole and declared it his... he is feeding it content from this group, grabbing hand-picked paragraphs, then scrambling those using the Bellman–Ford algorithm and then he manually posts them because his mental health issues enables him to do that close to constantly. Playing with Linux... still a greenhorn... I'm getting a lot of killed files. I'm guessing the nonsense is in its brain damage mode again. My killfiles have him/her/it completely shut out. They imply looking for advice for a Linux application is instigating. And you do realize that it isn't impossible for RonB (aka ronb) to be doing this, or paying one of his programmer "friends" to do it. -- One Smart Penny! https://youtu.be/BUjnZhKk1Bg https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/smzXrBhsWf4 https://redd.it/6sfkup Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 19:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g0b773Fa9nkU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467635 |
On 9/17/18 1:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 2:30:11 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >> On 9/17/2018 2:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:57:50 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>> On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>> >>>>> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed >>>>> of... >>>> >>>> >>>> I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M posts. >>>> >>>> The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. >>> >>> LOL! Yeah, I have been slacking, haven't I? ;) >>> >>> How many times is it in there as posted by me (as opposed to a forgery)? >> >> >> 107x by "Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" in the last 5 years >> >> search Sep 18 2013 to Sep 17 2018 >> >> To get the list I did a search on 'BaJoRi:', the 8th entry and a unique >> word that probably didn't overcount. Of course I didn't view every post >> to confirm it contains the full Snitlist. > > How long did the search take? > >> You often enough felt compelled to post it multiple times a day (4x on >> 2015-08-18). The mental illness is strong. > > LOL! The goal was once a week so I missed it by a mile ;) > Your goal in life is to troll me. Wow. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 19:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g0b78tFa9nkU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467630 |
On 9/17/18 1:29 PM, DFS wrote: > On 9/17/2018 2:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:57:50 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>> On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed >>>> of... >>> >>> >>> I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M >>> posts. >>> >>> The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. >> >> LOL! Yeah, I have been slacking, haven't I? ;) >> >> How many times is it in there as posted by me (as opposed to a forgery)? > > > 107x by "Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" in the last 5 years > > search Sep 18 2013 to Sep 17 2018 > > To get the list I did a search on 'BaJoRi:', the 8th entry and a unique > word that probably didn't overcount. Of course I didn't view every post > to confirm it contains the full Snitlist. > > You often enough felt compelled to post it multiple times a day (4x on > 2015-08-18). The mental illness is strong. > > > > UTCDATE,MESSAGEID > 2013-11-04,<3ee812db-2385-4de2-8386-cfb0676ef37b@googlegroups.com> > 2013-11-18,<d0b131de-5dfa-43bd-a021-a25aec0cfd94@googlegroups.com> > > 2013-12-03,<c940af4d-411f-481d-8105-df9330a07785@googlegroups.com> > 2013-12-03,<59487d91-3d45-4b3c-b5b2-62c345b3e5cb@googlegroups.com> > > 2013-12-06,<ffc9643f-e8b0-477c-9c96-f9cc591097d6@googlegroups.com> > 2013-12-06,<a0e035a5-2d3a-4736-917c-ddcab3c5e3d9@googlegroups.com> > > 2013-12-07,<dd0942ec-add3-4aa1-8cd8-f7eff035d306@googlegroups.com> > 2013-12-11,<ba89196a-2061-4df8-b9e0-7de7a518f440@googlegroups.com> > 2013-12-12,<9e50b706-61c1-4536-94cc-22eca9a0e317@googlegroups.com> > 2013-12-13,<370e4e15-d8d4-4bcb-a716-f2ef39913a5e@googlegroups.com> > > 2013-12-18,<666499ef-2b45-4f69-b042-9e4583ad368b@googlegroups.com> > 2013-12-18,<6d796985-936c-41d3-8b0c-b584b3906f8f@googlegroups.com> > 2013-12-18,<843ded45-a361-4453-b2c0-9c1cfd25d410@googlegroups.com> > > 2014-02-05,<5b31dced-3932-4cca-bc53-c3215942daee@googlegroups.com> > 2014-02-05,<b7a10fbb-ffbb-49a3-927d-9d72e8b5ca4e@googlegroups.com> > > 2014-02-07,<4b69cb83-6f63-4728-888a-5615f09c9c7e@googlegroups.com> > 2014-02-07,<604d5a61-51e4-4954-ab30-93392bd64310@googlegroups.com> > > 2014-02-08,<e281a88f-4d38-43ad-a060-7bf1b8fafb58@googlegroups.com> > 2014-02-11,<9da99f20-f45a-4772-9d8b-0ddbac730605@googlegroups.com> > 2014-02-21,<f612f7ef-9fef-4170-ac43-e03a5488ed97@googlegroups.com> > 2014-04-01,<d30f1563-3f6e-425e-bb2d-83eeca0314af@googlegroups.com> > 2014-04-20,<d1a974c1-0ff1-4896-b103-d172d7b063d9@googlegroups.com> > 2014-06-24,<da052af3-50ee-4341-8a45-a93d8eefbc70@googlegroups.com> > 2014-07-03,<3c40f7ad-c9a4-4076-a5d2-01dbc2d36d9c@googlegroups.com> > > 2014-07-31,<b81daa98-7b25-4183-971a-b4b496bd8107@googlegroups.com> > 2014-07-31,<24d5013e-5ee0-4ea9-992d-d6d5c8f3e037@googlegroups.com> > > 2014-08-07,<cd1963c7-4347-4cf3-a7b2-2e36539ef316@googlegroups.com> > 2014-08-20,<3a081e12-c58e-46d3-b353-b81a9d84203c@googlegroups.com> > 2014-08-25,<c0f1e175-ec90-4c86-a116-e3e23b5ba363@googlegroups.com> > 2014-08-27,<3c17a958-a9b8-4191-b086-0c2ec1d93ecf@googlegroups.com> > 2014-10-24,<8c611f8a-7fa5-4803-b753-a444f20c8f20@googlegroups.com> > 2014-10-25,<48e8aa2f-1072-4189-92d4-c97d89cf8763@googlegroups.com> > 2014-10-28,<f2ac5213-f2dc-488f-bff1-bcb28bc074ff@googlegroups.com> > > 2014-10-30,<3b616993-9e16-4291-82a8-1c89f61bdd4c@googlegroups.com> > 2014-10-30,<97eca86e-a459-4299-87fe-7d1cc4b4a159@googlegroups.com> > 2014-10-30,<f4f28186-bd80-4158-b623-a145d9b45590@googlegroups.com> > > 2014-10-31,<83950226-27f7-430e-9d60-7ed491cf039b@googlegroups.com> > 2014-10-31,<c96c2339-74c6-4bdc-8c7d-29742bdecf53@googlegroups.com> > 2014-10-31,<8f16ad82-c344-454c-ab1a-ee302815b8f4@googlegroups.com> > > 2014-11-25,<5b30d8c4-7c37-4647-bcd2-3f34c5d94e0f@googlegroups.com> > 2014-11-29,<c6fa04be-1420-418e-9e71-46ba2d34f1bd@googlegroups.com> > 2015-01-06,<310a2d2a-1d23-45c9-8745-57e3c2db33ea@googlegroups.com> > 2015-02-26,<4ecc27c3-cedc-48cf-ac1e-d36c6b7bd78e@googlegroups.com> > 2015-02-27,<ce14c7c4-5020-425c-841c-0fe403983d8a@googlegroups.com> > 2015-03-19,<66a4aee5-0c33-4bf6-972a-2d141330e61a@googlegroups.com> > 2015-05-08,<046e0ec2-be6b-46d3-985f-d56275dad162@googlegroups.com> > 2015-08-04,<704ff716-7060-4924-a661-2924b0b2acce@googlegroups.com> > 2015-08-05,<fd130011-1a6f-4f9a-b8e0-4ffe6db4f32d@googlegroups.com> > 2015-08-06,<4abc4ec2-c938-46d6-8633-5a7fb3acb68c@googlegroups.com> > > 2015-08-18,<16ffba08-2508-4efd-9ce8-ec5c21fcda79@googlegroups.com> > 2015-08-18,<206bbceb-a614-4b7e-97d8-94e32b59163c@googlegroups.com> > 2015-08-18,<2d913225-9e79-49d4-8d12-ce020a7791db@googlegroups.com> > 2015-08-18,<7d04108f-44f9-4b7d-9747-0379a061bc33@googlegroups.com> > > 2015-08-19,<0bc6b0b2-5304-4643-9dd0-ccd2e3ed1d62@googlegroups.com> > 2015-09-01,<88fbdc4e-46e4-46a9-8f9e-1e9a73a1d99b@googlegroups.com> > 2015-09-03,<565aaaa7-88c5-4966-8a83-066ccd853789@googlegroups.com> > 2015-10-21,<8257cd48-aa3d-4807-805a-25336a238f8a@googlegroups.com> > 2015-11-25,<63fe8c89-a32e-46c0-a986-817e1c4eeafa@googlegroups.com> > 2015-11-30,<536a6fa5-38d1-41bd-86d8-d9d51df240c6@googlegroups.com> > 2015-12-11,<653327b6-d9ea-4205-9609-6f57db1dde4b@googlegroups.com> > 2015-12-18,<01ec1854-c8d0-4a64-8c6f-f47065ec09c3@googlegroups.com> > > 2015-12-23,<641025b6-4186-4eaa-8b2e-23414f1197db@googlegroups.com> > 2015-12-23,<220f27fd-8065-4df4-8008-842b9e3a5de0@googlegroups.com> > > 2016-03-29,<e1ff01c3-1809-4cd7-970f-69ccf7f3ef5c@googlegroups.com> > 2016-04-16,<e574111b-c4e4-4076-93f0-6a1f83d009aa@googlegroups.com> > 2016-04-20,<2a5d5c1c-d063-4b06-9d74-44c968de9871@googlegroups.com> > 2016-04-28,<bfa76dd6-5840-4e88-8f5b-d261266e0fe5@googlegroups.com> > 2016-04-29,<6d22401e-afa6-49d0-a170-0b8ac045bb66@googlegroups.com> > > 2016-05-04,<634addf1-f1ea-4659-91e3-d1222b03d2db@googlegroups.com> > 2016-05-04,<c1222e1c-04b2-427f-9d32-db2d08a8dfb9@googlegroups.com> > 2016-05-04,<274bdbc0-43fe-4e3d-91f2-da998e80956e@googlegroups.com> > > 2016-05-06,<e833129f-462f-4ddb-a0f1-453c487dc039@googlegroups.com> > 2016-05-06,<c5643e52-5d82-4898-9eb9-f5e0366c9cec@googlegroups.com> > > 2016-05-07,<bba188e9-10c9-4a7c-b51b-e56fe4bf1759@googlegroups.com> > 2016-05-08,<c0b2d2e8-ec5b-4e6f-9941-e550b1812647@googlegroups.com> > > 2016-05-11,<47c65fe3-31f0-4df8-aee6-d549a4d5b732@googlegroups.com> > 2016-05-11,<2f812d4b-032e-4260-9d64-1c2a4f5edddf@googlegroups.com> > > 2016-05-13,<7478f141-18d1-4e66-ba7d-5f02f83476c2@googlegroups.com> > 2016-05-21,<d0640a01-d401-49f6-a134-a0fb479cd70c@googlegroups.com> > 2016-06-03,<4b7a3347-5bd9-4ea6-a5a5-cefd28c8aaea@googlegroups.com> > 2016-08-10,<e625ce11-5763-4cec-9324-0f110d19773d@googlegroups.com> > 2016-08-29,<0d94c80b-77cd-496c-b7e7-4f2e2a383d9e@googlegroups.com> > 2016-08-31,<6148a649-5550-4c3f-ba7d-898e6bfd0e64@googlegroups.com> > 2016-09-11,<e6508e2a-a05c-4e88-9ecf-ef4b991f713d@googlegroups.com> > 2016-09-14,<175bb08f-c1d4-4588-8158-659b8716c4ad@googlegroups.com> > 2016-11-14,<b31c08dd-5b9d-4352-9220-554c7557a200@googlegroups.com> > 2016-11-19,<dd45a178-ffb0-483e-aaa8-0a706ae8066a@googlegroups.com> > > 2016-11-23,<b4995d3d-bb1f-494b-b7a0-2b00520bb021@googlegroups.com> > 2016-11-23,<e55bd465-b5b4-4e5e-aa3a-237593ce4340@googlegroups.com> > > 2016-11-26,<a86b3437-a2e3-4ee2-8bf6-041d456cb065@googlegroups.com> > 2016-12-09,<7fa04214-df9b-4c69-a88d-a43146d97828@googlegroups.com> > > 2017-02-02,<98f0709b-5a63-4d1b-9a57-e1079026d34d@googlegroups.com> > 2017-02-02,<22d35ade-9ea9-4a87-95d4-7855d7e43883@googlegroups.com> > 2017-02-02,<790ae697-a30b-450c-8219-e78772bfa7c2@googlegroups.com> > 2017-02-02,<e0a6e954-2e43-4ca9-ba36-c4c38ad048cb@googlegroups.com> > > 2017-04-10,<f0690d41-8de8-416b-bd05-799741a5a3b6@googlegroups.com> > 2017-04-17,<e859f765-0191-4f6b-b06c-f39624c930f0@googlegroups.com> > 2017-04-18,<6fdef6d1-102c-4cf0-9713-d2470f602435@googlegroups.com> > > 2017-04-20,<bd157de4-901f-4657-942f-c6de68b6a178@googlegroups.com> > 2017-04-20,<482ab23a-f887-4e04-9a95-6c7ea279875e@googlegroups.com> > > 2017-07-17,<9c6216d1-662e-47e5-8548-e4ff2683bd1d@googlegroups.com> > 2018-06-01,<pesdjn$udt$1@dont-email.me> > 2018-07-18,<bbd5aae5-3831-471b-ae23-5cf0d58391e5@googlegroups.com> > 2018-07-23,<0bcd2eea-72a9-49ff-9d3c-138719574c30@googlegroups.com> > 2018-07-24,<248b1859-4635-4835-ae98-042f9e4504e0@googlegroups.com> > 2018-07-30,<a574e078-32dc-46e9-b4a9-f07e0afb5c2e@googlegroups.com> > 2018-08-04,<7bf4ffc8-ce7f-44b9-8cf7-6f2d51b92b0a@googlegroups.com> And that is with just ONE of his accounts, no? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 11:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g0ab81F4shlU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467579 |
On 9/17/18 10:55 AM, DFS wrote: > On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > >> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed >> of... > > > I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M > posts. > > The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. > 10x if you count his socks. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 21:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0iVnD.105278$lM2.71022@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #467579 |
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:55:52 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 9/16/2018 5:04 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > >> That is memory of his usenet server. 14Gib is nothing to be impressed >> of... > > > I think it's pretty UNimpressive to be that big and contain only 2.6M > posts. > > The main issue is the 1453-line Snitlist that Carroll posts 3x per day. Of the 2.6M posts, 2M are from Snit trolling. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 22:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnpb8t01r7g@news1.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #467645 |
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:47:40 +0000, SilverSlimer wrote: > > Of the 2.6M posts, 2M are from Snit trolling. > So true. Let's consider sci.physics which, as I have been informed, used to be a valuable resource in the scientific community. But doing a search on sci.physics today for a valid, bona-fide, scientific topic like "quantum mechanics" or "dark matter" will only produce thousands of useless articles written by cloistered kooks. That's why anyone who attempts to compile a Usenet archival database is a total idiot. The exception are the binary groups where much excellent material is still to be found.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <07c8d16f-6b91-4ca5-8498-698be17f17cd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467655 |
On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 4:53:46 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:47:40 +0000, SilverSlimer wrote: > > > > > Of the 2.6M posts, 2M are from Snit trolling. > > > > So true. > > Let's consider sci.physics which, as I have been informed, used > to be a valuable resource in the scientific community. > > But doing a search on sci.physics today for a valid, bona-fide, > scientific topic like "quantum mechanics" or "dark matter" > will only produce thousands of useless articles written by > cloistered kooks. > > That's why anyone who attempts to compile a Usenet archival > database is a total idiot. Why, when the data he wants is still in there? Plus, he stated what he's doing already and it's worth it to him (he's not archiving for archiving's sake).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web