Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #327560 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-21 15:06 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-10-22 12:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 68 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Ping A.M Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 15:06 -0400
Re: Ping A.M "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 17:38 -0400
Re: Ping A.M Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 17:50 -0400
Re: Ping A.M "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-21 17:55 -0400
Re: Ping A.M Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 18:05 -0400
Re: Ping A.M Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 15:16 -0700
Re: Ping A.M Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 15:28 -0700
Hissy fit snit. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-21 16:54 -0700
Re: Ping A.M Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-21 15:31 -0700
Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 15:13 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-10-22 01:07 +0000
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-21 21:24 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 18:29 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-10-23 10:57 +0100
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-23 08:29 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 07:52 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-23 11:07 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-23 09:34 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-23 09:04 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-23 12:17 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 09:51 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-23 13:03 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 10:11 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-23 13:33 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 10:32 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-23 13:45 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 11:39 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-23 12:29 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 12:51 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 13:00 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-10-24 20:52 +0000
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-23 14:43 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-23 12:47 -0500
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 11:46 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:41 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-23 17:18 -0500
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 15:41 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-23 18:50 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-24 11:06 -0500
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:02 -0600
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 22:11 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-23 14:46 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 11:56 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 12:45 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:52 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-23 17:11 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> - 2015-10-23 17:15 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-23 17:48 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:52 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-23 18:02 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:11 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:34 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-23 17:17 -0500
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-23 17:15 -0500
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-23 20:08 -0600
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 10:29 -0700
Lots of people are (mentally) disabled. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-23 07:39 -0700
Re: Lots of people are (mentally) disabled. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-23 17:00 +0200
Re: Lots of people are (mentally) disabled. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-23 11:37 -0400
Re: Lots of people are (mentally) disabled. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-23 11:57 -0400
Re: Lots of people are (mentally) disabled. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 10:32 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 10:26 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-23 14:41 -0400
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 12:40 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:48 -0700
Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-10-24 20:50 +0000
Re: Ping A.M Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-22 00:12 +0000
Re: Pong A.M William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-22 12:40 +0100
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-24 22:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <D251B2A6.615B7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328218 |
On 10/24/15, 6:02 PM, in article jvadnSUlef3Ut7HLnZ2dnUU7-T2dnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>>>> Also likely broke harassment laws. >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/harassment.html> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not a lawyer but seems pretty clear Carroll and "Nobody" clearly cross >>>>>> the >>>>>> line over and over and over. >>>>> >>>>> Then time for you to STFU then... >>>> >>>> Can you show me how? :) >>>> >>>> By the way, your Linux Usenet client is clipping parts of the posts you >>>> respond to. You might want to find another. >> >> That's not a bug. That's net ettiquite. > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! You have some very bad manners there JED. Gee, either Linux or JEDIDIAH are defective. Take your pick. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 14:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327939 |
On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: >> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: >>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. >>>> >>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to >>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? >>> >>> Nope. >>> >>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. >> >> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a >> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say >> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant >> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which >> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, >> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be >> charged with a crime. >> > > No. Probably not. > > You've probably just broken a contract. > > People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it is later determined that the information has been used to harass... -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 11:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <eadde514-54b2-4032-9fda-510fe256d92d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #327965 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 12:46:21 PM UTC-6, Charmed Tuna wrote: > On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > > On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: > >> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: > >>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: > >>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. > >>>> > >>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to > >>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? > >>> > >>> Nope. > >>> > >>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. > >> > >> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a > >> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say > >> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant > >> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which > >> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, > >> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be > >> charged with a crime. > >> > > > > No. Probably not. > > > > You've probably just broken a contract. > > > > People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. > > What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request > his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is > recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it > is later determined that the information has been used to harass... IP address? Really?! Not the info from the method that was used to pay for the transaction? ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 12:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <D24FDC7E.6131C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #327965 |
On 10/23/15, 11:46 AM, in article n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: >>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: >>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. >>>>> >>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to >>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? >>>> >>>> Nope. >>>> >>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. >>> >>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a >>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say >>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant >>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which >>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, >>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be >>> charged with a crime. >>> >> >> No. Probably not. >> >> You've probably just broken a contract. >> >> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. > > What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request > his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is > recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it > is later determined that the information has been used to harass... > Carroll uses Tor accounts, but whomever it was likely had to pay with Credit Card or PayPal or the like. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 12:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <87730b02-5614-452c-82f7-7a593e7a5724@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #327979 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 1:45:59 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/23/15, 11:46 AM, in article n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > > On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: > >>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: > >>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: > >>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. > >>>>> > >>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to > >>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? > >>>> > >>>> Nope. > >>>> > >>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. > >>> > >>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a > >>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say > >>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant > >>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which > >>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, > >>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be > >>> charged with a crime. > >>> > >> > >> No. Probably not. > >> > >> You've probably just broken a contract. > >> > >> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. > > > > What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request > > his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is > > recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it > > is later determined that the information has been used to harass... > > > > Carroll uses Tor accounts, Lied the liar who can never seem to prove this regularly spewed lie, the same liar who said he doesn't use TOR... the same liar who put up a video showing TOR on his system. This is the same liar for who Sandman busted him using TOR years ago. See how reality doesn't go away just because you need it to, liar? LOL! > but whomever it was likely had to pay with Credit > Card or PayPal or the like. And, of course, *no one* is stupid enough to have done that and then posted the info publicly, which is why you are the most likely candidate to have posted it, Mr. Victim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 17:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <n0e7mp$ofn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327979 |
On 2015-10-23 3:45 PM, Snit wrote: > On 10/23/15, 11:46 AM, in article n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. >>>>>> >>>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to >>>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? >>>>> >>>>> Nope. >>>>> >>>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. >>>> >>>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a >>>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say >>>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant >>>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which >>>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, >>>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be >>>> charged with a crime. >>>> >>> >>> No. Probably not. >>> >>> You've probably just broken a contract. >>> >>> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. >> >> What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request >> his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is >> recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it >> is later determined that the information has been used to harass... >> > > Carroll uses Tor accounts, but whomever it was likely had to pay with Credit > Card or PayPal or the like. Absolutely. I would be very surprised if the government accepted Bitcoin. I'm pretty sure that you can request to find out who made a request for your data and we can determine whether Steve Petruzzellis did it. It will simultaneously demonstrate that he is the Rhino Plastee troll since that was the person who posted the information in the first place. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 17:15 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <k9hpchz8dluj$.1r12pb3amhjal$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #327991 |
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:11:55 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: > On 2015-10-23 3:45 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 10/23/15, 11:46 AM, in article n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to >>>>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. >>>>>> >>>>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. >>>>> >>>>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a >>>>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say >>>>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant >>>>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which >>>>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, >>>>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be >>>>> charged with a crime. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No. Probably not. >>>> >>>> You've probably just broken a contract. >>>> >>>> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. >>> >>> What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request >>> his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is >>> recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it >>> is later determined that the information has been used to harass... >>> >> >> Carroll uses Tor accounts, but whomever it was likely had to pay with Credit >> Card or PayPal or the like. > > Absolutely. I would be very surprised if the government accepted > Bitcoin. I'm pretty sure that you can request to find out who made a > request for your data and we can determine whether Steve Petruzzellis > did it. It will simultaneously demonstrate that he is the Rhino Plastee > troll since that was the person who posted the information in the first > place. The original. I see Onion Knight. What do you see? You seem to suffer from the same poor reading comprehension skills snit does. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ceYxgNmfubM/cd-7nNMeCQAJ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 17:48 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <n0e9rq$1hn$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327993 |
On 2015-10-23 5:15 PM, Rhino Plastee wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:11:55 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: > >> On 2015-10-23 3:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 10/23/15, 11:46 AM, in article n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to >>>>>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a >>>>>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say >>>>>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant >>>>>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which >>>>>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, >>>>>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be >>>>>> charged with a crime. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No. Probably not. >>>>> >>>>> You've probably just broken a contract. >>>>> >>>>> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. >>>> >>>> What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request >>>> his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is >>>> recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it >>>> is later determined that the information has been used to harass... >>>> >>> >>> Carroll uses Tor accounts, but whomever it was likely had to pay with Credit >>> Card or PayPal or the like. >> >> Absolutely. I would be very surprised if the government accepted >> Bitcoin. I'm pretty sure that you can request to find out who made a >> request for your data and we can determine whether Steve Petruzzellis >> did it. It will simultaneously demonstrate that he is the Rhino Plastee >> troll since that was the person who posted the information in the first >> place. > > The original. > I see Onion Knight. > What do you see? > You seem to suffer from the same poor reading comprehension skills snit > does. > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ceYxgNmfubM/cd-7nNMeCQAJ That's only if I had a reason to believe that Onion Knight and you are different people. To me, you're the same person and one of Steve Carroll's many socks. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 14:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <D24FFA13.6137E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328002 |
On 10/23/15, 2:48 PM, in article n0e9rq$1hn$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> Absolutely. I would be very surprised if the government accepted >>> Bitcoin. I'm pretty sure that you can request to find out who made a >>> request for your data and we can determine whether Steve Petruzzellis >>> did it. It will simultaneously demonstrate that he is the Rhino Plastee >>> troll since that was the person who posted the information in the first >>> place. >> >> The original. >> I see Onion Knight. >> What do you see? >> You seem to suffer from the same poor reading comprehension skills snit >> does. >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ceYxgNmfubM/cd-7nNMeCQ >> AJ > > That's only if I had a reason to believe that Onion Knight and you are > different people. To me, you're the same person and one of Steve > Carroll's many socks. Could also be "Nobody", but of course Rhino Plastee and Onion Knight are the same person. I was not aware he was even trying to hide it. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 18:02 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <13mm8rofumnlo.1vt4myinrmtp2$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328002 |
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:48:44 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: > On 2015-10-23 5:15 PM, Rhino Plastee wrote: >> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:11:55 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-23 3:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 10/23/15, 11:46 AM, in article n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to >>>>>>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a >>>>>>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say >>>>>>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant >>>>>>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which >>>>>>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, >>>>>>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be >>>>>>> charged with a crime. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No. Probably not. >>>>>> >>>>>> You've probably just broken a contract. >>>>>> >>>>>> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. >>>>> >>>>> What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request >>>>> his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is >>>>> recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it >>>>> is later determined that the information has been used to harass... >>>>> >>>> >>>> Carroll uses Tor accounts, but whomever it was likely had to pay with Credit >>>> Card or PayPal or the like. >>> >>> Absolutely. I would be very surprised if the government accepted >>> Bitcoin. I'm pretty sure that you can request to find out who made a >>> request for your data and we can determine whether Steve Petruzzellis >>> did it. It will simultaneously demonstrate that he is the Rhino Plastee >>> troll since that was the person who posted the information in the first >>> place. >> >> The original. >> I see Onion Knight. >> What do you see? >> You seem to suffer from the same poor reading comprehension skills snit >> does. >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ceYxgNmfubM/cd-7nNMeCQAJ > > That's only if I had a reason to believe that Onion Knight and you are > different people. To me, you're the same person and one of Steve > Carroll's many socks. They are all Nobody socks. It's Edwin from CSMA. Snit is right. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 15:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <07fadaa7-803b-4af9-be1c-5cf04c32a742@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #328011 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 4:03:06 PM UTC-6, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:48:44 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: > > > On 2015-10-23 5:15 PM, Rhino Plastee wrote: > >> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:11:55 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: > >> > >>> On 2015-10-23 3:45 PM, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 10/23/15, 11:46 AM, in article n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >>>>>> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: > >>>>>>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to > >>>>>>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Nope. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a > >>>>>>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say > >>>>>>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant > >>>>>>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which > >>>>>>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, > >>>>>>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be > >>>>>>> charged with a crime. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No. Probably not. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You've probably just broken a contract. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. > >>>>> > >>>>> What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request > >>>>> his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is > >>>>> recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it > >>>>> is later determined that the information has been used to harass... > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Carroll uses Tor accounts, but whomever it was likely had to pay with Credit > >>>> Card or PayPal or the like. > >>> > >>> Absolutely. I would be very surprised if the government accepted > >>> Bitcoin. I'm pretty sure that you can request to find out who made a > >>> request for your data and we can determine whether Steve Petruzzellis > >>> did it. It will simultaneously demonstrate that he is the Rhino Plastee > >>> troll since that was the person who posted the information in the first > >>> place. > >> > >> The original. > >> I see Onion Knight. > >> What do you see? > >> You seem to suffer from the same poor reading comprehension skills snit > >> does. > >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ceYxgNmfubM/cd-7nNMeCQAJ > > > > That's only if I had a reason to believe that Onion Knight and you are > > different people. To me, you're the same person and one of Steve > > Carroll's many socks. > > They are all Nobody socks. > It's Edwin from CSMA. > Snit is right. I don't think Eddie would do that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 14:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <D24FF5DF.61361%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #327991 |
On 10/23/15, 2:11 PM, in article n0e7mp$ofn$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-10-23 3:45 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 10/23/15, 11:46 AM, in article n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to >>>>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. >>>>>> >>>>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. >>>>> >>>>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a >>>>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say >>>>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant >>>>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which >>>>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, >>>>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be >>>>> charged with a crime. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No. Probably not. >>>> >>>> You've probably just broken a contract. >>>> >>>> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. >>> >>> What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request >>> his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is >>> recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it >>> is later determined that the information has been used to harass... >>> >> >> Carroll uses Tor accounts, but whomever it was likely had to pay with Credit >> Card or PayPal or the like. > > Absolutely. I would be very surprised if the government accepted > Bitcoin. I'm pretty sure that you can request to find out who made a > request for your data and we can determine whether Steve Petruzzellis > did it. It will simultaneously demonstrate that he is the Rhino Plastee > troll since that was the person who posted the information in the first > place. He posted what service he got it from before. Assuming he did not make that up I would need to contact them, show the post, and ask. Not sure they would let me have the info, but they might cancel his account. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 17:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <slrnn2lcfk.gqb.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #327991 |
On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: > On 2015-10-23 3:45 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 10/23/15, 11:46 AM, in article n0dv5p$hdm$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to >>>>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. >>>>>> >>>>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. >>>>> >>>>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a >>>>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say >>>>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant >>>>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which >>>>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, >>>>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be >>>>> charged with a crime. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No. Probably not. >>>> >>>> You've probably just broken a contract. >>>> >>>> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. >>> >>> What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request >>> his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is >>> recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it >>> is later determined that the information has been used to harass... >>> >> >> Carroll uses Tor accounts, but whomever it was likely had to pay with Credit >> Card or PayPal or the like. > > Absolutely. I would be very surprised if the government accepted > Bitcoin. I'm pretty sure that you can request to find out who made a "Government data" has been in the hands of data aggregators for decades now. It is likely that the question of whether or not to accept Bitcoin is in the hands of some digital middle man and that the government really has nothing to do with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 17:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <slrnn2lcc6.gqb.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #327965 |
On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote:
> On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna <> wrote:
>>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote:
>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote:
>>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions.
>>>>>
>>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to
>>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law?
>>>>
>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt.
>>>
>>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a
>>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say
>>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant
>>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which
>>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms,
>>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be
>>> charged with a crime.
>>>
>>
>> No. Probably not.
>>
>> You've probably just broken a contract.
>>
>> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often.
>
> What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request
> his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is
> recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it
> is later determined that the information has been used to harass...
That sounds entirely too diligent for an American corporation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 20:08 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <OaSdnc2s-I-5dbfLnZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #327965 |
On 10/23/15 12:46, Charmed Tuna wrote: > On 2015-10-23 1:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> On 2015-10-23, Charmed Tuna<> wrote: >>> On 2015-10-23 12:04 PM, -hh wrote: >>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:34:19 AM UTC-4, Charmed Tuna wrote: >>>>> On 2015-10-23 5:57 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. >>>>> >>>>> So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to >>>>> demonstrate how Snit broke the law? >>>> >>>> Nope. >>>> >>>> But hey, nice strawman attempt. >>> >>> Well, wait a minute. If the government allows you to get a record of a >>> person's criminal activities for $20, that's fine. However, they say >>> themselves that you're not allowed to broadcast it and it is only meant >>> to be used in criminal proceedings. If the lawmakers are the ones which >>> provided you with the right and you have basically broken their terms, >>> then you've broken the law. Rhino Plastee, in this case, could be >>> charged with a crime. >>> >> >> No. Probably not. >> >> You've probably just broken a contract. >> >> People tend to conflate these sorts of things quite often. > > What I hope that Snit understands is that if someone paid $20 to request > his criminal information, the IP address used to make such a request is > recorded and can be used against the person who purchased it in case it > is later determined that the information has been used to harass... > > That's a bit odd. In Montana the state posts all criminal convictions on their website and can be accessed for free. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 10:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why don't you try giving a traffic cop some of your Lip, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <D24FBC97.6129F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #327849 |
On 10/23/15, 6:34 AM, in article n0dcso$rr2$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> Spend $20.00 on an intellius report and you will know all about snit. >>> All public record so you can post the information anywhere you like. >> >> Wrong, wrong, wrong. >> >> Relevant excerpts from the Intellius Terms and Conditions: >> >> "General Restrictions. You agree to use our information only for >> appropriate, legal purposes, and in compliance with all applicable >> federal, state and local laws and regulations. Additionally, you agree >> that our databases and information may not be used to bother, stalk, >> harass, threaten or embarrass any individual." >> >> "You agree not to reproduce, retransmit, distribute, disseminate, sell, >> publish, broadcast, or circulate the text, images and/or information >> received through the Intelius databases to anyone without our express >> prior written consent." >> >> >> So you are in violation of their terms and conditions. > > So Rhino Plastee (Steve Carroll) broke the law in an attempt to > demonstrate how Snit broke the law? Ironic. Likely also broke harassment laws. Meanwhile I got a minor traffic ticket and went to driving school. I am evil. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 07:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Lots of people are (mentally) disabled. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.23{7.39A.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #327833 |
Dr_John_Grubor said @Snit is: > > > on the public dole for a phony disability It's real, not phony. Lots of people are (mentally) disabled; especially here, on Usenet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 17:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Lots of people are (mentally) disabled. |
| Message-ID | <n0dhum$li9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327880 |
wrote: > Dr_John_Grubor said @Snit is: >> > > on the public dole for a phony disability > > It's real, not phony. > > Lots of people are (mentally) disabled; > especially here, on Usenet. Yes. You count at least for 3 mentally ill. Meet your fellow imbecile Snit Michael Glasser, his many socks and assorted scum like DumbFullSnit, flatfish and other retarded human garbage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 11:37 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Lots of people are (mentally) disabled. |
| Message-ID | <n0dk2v$sal$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327886 |
On 2015-10-23 11:00 AM, Peter the Klöwnish, Trolling Journeyman attacked his intellectual superiors. < snip > -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 11:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Lots of people are (mentally) disabled. |
| Message-ID | <n0dl9r$5nd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #327886 |
On 10/23/2015 11:00 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> Dr_John_Grubor said @Snit is:
>>>>> on the public dole for a phony disability
>>
>> It's real, not phony.
>>
>> Lots of people are (mentally) disabled;
>> especially here, on Usenet.
>
> Yes. You count at least for 3 mentally ill. Meet your fellow imbecile Snit
> Michael Glasser, his many socks and assorted scum like DumbFullSnit,
> flatfish and other retarded human garbage
I got your retard right here:
Snit: "Heck, how much of the original Linux code is in the current
Linux code?
Dumbkopf: "Very little. Just look at the line count of the kernels
alone"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web