Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #470630 > unrolled thread

Popular politician's rowdy teen years

Started byRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
First post2018-10-04 17:17 +0000
Last post2018-10-14 07:28 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 214 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:17 +0000
    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-05 15:48 -0700
    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 17:32 -0700
    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 19:37 -0700
      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 07:23 -0700
        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 17:00 -0700
    Popular politician's rowdy teen years -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-06 05:07 -0700
      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 05:32 -0700
      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 09:13 -0700
        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-06 16:49 +0000
        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-07 14:15 -0700
          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 14:33 -0700
            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 08:04 -0700
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 23:58 -0700
        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-08 07:17 -0500
          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 05:43 -0700
          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-08 15:06 -0700
          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 01:15 +0000
            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 18:41 -0700
            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-12 07:47 -0400
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-12 14:14 +0200
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 05:43 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:40 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:41 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 12:13 +0200
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:59 -0400
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-13 04:14 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 14:02 +0200
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 05:21 -0700
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-13 13:48 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 14:13 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-13 18:45 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:03 -0700
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 21:12 -0700
                            Who isn't "owned", you ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-13 20:20 -0700
                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-13 23:51 -0400
                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 21:43 -0700
                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:21 -0400
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 08:51 -0700
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 10:40 -0700
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 12:12 -0400
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 11:25 -0500
                                      Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 12:46 -0400
                                        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 12:01 -0500
                                          Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 14:10 -0400
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:22 -0500
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:27 -0700
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:42 -0700
                                        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 13:43 -0400
                                          Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:25 -0500
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:07 -0400
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 13:32 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 22:36 +0200
                                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:43 -0400
                                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 14:03 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:46 -0400
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 06:48 -0500
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 05:24 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:10 -0400
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 09:39 -0700
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-15 13:39 -0400
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 10:56 -0700
                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 20:56 -0700
                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 07:26 -0700
                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 09:06 -0700
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-14 10:14 -0700
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 10:15 -0700
                                    Just an opinion pieces written by a crack pot Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:18 -0700
                                      Re: Just an opinion pieces written by a crack pot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 11:47 -0700
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:52 -0700
                                      Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 11:15 -0700
                                      Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 12:03 -0700
                                        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 12:34 -0700
                                        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:21 -0700
                                          Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:37 -0700
                                          Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 15:07 -0700
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 15:30 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 16:45 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-14 19:44 -0700
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 00:46 +0200
                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-14 10:05 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-14 10:09 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:13 +0000
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 12:16 -0400
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 09:32 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:52 +0000
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:56 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 11:20 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:40 -0400
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 12:11 +0200
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 10:41 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 08:30 -0700
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:59 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:09 +0000
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 07:52 -0500
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 10:59 -0400
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 08:20 -0700
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-12 08:36 -0500
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:46 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 18:56 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 19:12 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:42 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 03:46 -0700
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:18 +0000
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 12:23 -0400
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:55 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:44 +0200
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 05:21 -0400
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 03:08 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 05:22 -0400
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 08:26 -0400
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 05:44 -0700
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 09:02 -0400
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 07:18 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:26 +0000
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 16:24 +0200
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 07:49 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 11:46 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 09:07 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:28 +0000
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 14:26 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 12:15 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-15 21:32 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 19:00 -0700
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 08:10 +0200
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 23:40 -0700
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-16 11:08 -0400
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:23 +0000
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 14:14 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:29 -0500
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 20:41 +0200
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 14:33 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 14:10 -0500
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:13 +0000
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 20:20 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:33 +0000
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 21:16 -0400
                                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 20:02 -0700
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 01:29 -0700
                                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:40 -0700
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:47 -0700
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-16 17:58 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:51 -0700
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:07 -0700
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 06:51 -0500
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-16 12:20 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 12:58 -0500
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:10 -0700
                                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 13:23 -0500
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:35 -0700
                                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 13:37 -0500
                                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:23 -0700
                                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 20:31 -0700
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 13:12 -0700
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:23 -0700
                                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-16 18:47 -0400
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:52 -0700
                                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 21:48 -0700
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:08 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:21 -0700
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:08 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:11 +0000
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 20:18 -0400
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:30 +0000
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 21:12 -0400
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:43 -0700
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:47 -0700
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 08:38 -0700
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:13 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:22 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 07:42 -0500
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 08:52 -0400
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:44 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:13 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 16:51 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 14:47 -0700
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:39 +0000
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 06:55 +0200
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 22:18 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:49 -0400
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 06:03 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:43 +0000
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:54 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 05:16 -0400
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:20 +0000
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 14:31 -0400
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:15 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:41 +0000
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 09:48 -0700
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 15:16 -0400
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 12:27 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:40 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:48 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:56 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 15:00 -0700
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 17:37 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 10:34 -0400
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 16:35 +0200
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 11:00 -0400
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:59 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:58 -0500
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 12:30 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:49 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-24 21:18 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-25 08:32 -0400
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 11:04 -0700
            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:26 -0700
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-12 21:47 +0200
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 15:33 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 17:04 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:22 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:48 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 11:03 -0700
    RonB is an Ass.  Enough said ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 07:28 -0700

Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11  Next page →


#471673

FromSilicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com>
Date2018-10-12 14:14 +0200
Message-ID<87murjpdjc.fsf@yahoo.com>
In reply to#471670
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:

> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>>
>
> Whatever happened, Kavanaugh proved himself unfit for a lifetime appointment
> to the highest court in the land with his sneering non-responses and
> a partisan and basically kooky diatribe and veiled threats about "what goes
> around comes around".

You're an idiot. He had been accused of gang rape. 

>
> Some judge he is.

The highest accredited judge for 12 years. As for partisan he is a
constitutionalist. Of course that hook nosed cow Ginsburg has never
shown any partisan leanings. You're so thick it's laughable.

,----
| I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the
| country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country,
| it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want
| to contemplate that.
`----

It takes a smarmy loser like you to fall for that Demorat circus. It was
a hit job through and through. They tried to ruin a good man. I suspect
you see yourself as the Windows QA equivalent of the Creepy Porn Lawyer
Avenatti.


You hate other people's success. I'm guessing that's why you suck up to
the likes of turd and wRonG.

It must suck to be you.

-- 
any of the subatomic particles (such as protons and neutrons) that are
made up of quarks and are subject to the strong force.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471675

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-12 05:43 -0700
Message-ID<aa3fb168-8e9c-41eb-bdeb-fb7bc9c78f3e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471673
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 5:14:49 AM UTC-7, Silicon Vee wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
> 
> > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >
> >>
> >
> > Whatever happened, Kavanaugh proved himself unfit for a lifetime appointment
> > to the highest court in the land with his sneering non-responses and
> > a partisan and basically kooky diatribe and veiled threats about "what goes
> > around comes around".
> 
> You're an idiot. He had been accused of gang rape. 
> 
> >
> > Some judge he is.
> 
> The highest accredited judge for 12 years. As for partisan he is a
> constitutionalist. Of course that hook nosed cow Ginsburg has never
> shown any partisan leanings. You're so thick it's laughable.
> 
> ,----
> | I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the
> | country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country,
> | it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want
> | to contemplate that.
> `----
> 
> It takes a smarmy loser like you to fall for that Demorat circus. It was
> a hit job through and through. They tried to ruin a good man. I suspect
> you see yourself as the Windows QA equivalent of the Creepy Porn Lawyer
> Avenatti.
> 
> 
> You hate other people's success. I'm guessing that's why you suck up to
> the likes of turd and wRonG.
> 
> It must suck to be you.
> 
> -- 
> any of the subatomic particles (such as protons and neutrons) that are
> made up of quarks and are subject to the strong force.



Steve Carroll deceived Klaus Schadenfreude some, big fricking deal. Why be a yowling jackass about it? Klaus Schadenfreude is the result of the truth that atheists have been appointed to be in charge of teaching young persons. It is not serendipity that he is a brainless liberal. 

His stupendous "debugging competence" distracted him from a plugin he insists does not exists that everyone else is already using with SC. The only thing not working here is Klaus Schadenfreude. 

--
Best CMS Solution of 2017!
http://www.5z8.info/titstitstitstits_j7t4bl_stalin
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471770

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-13 01:40 +0000
Message-ID<ppriec$rv6$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#471673
On 2018-10-12, Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
>
>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>>
>>
>> Whatever happened, Kavanaugh proved himself unfit for a lifetime appointment
>> to the highest court in the land with his sneering non-responses and
>> a partisan and basically kooky diatribe and veiled threats about "what goes
>> around comes around".
>
> You're an idiot. He had been accused of gang rape. 
>
>>
>> Some judge he is.
>
> The highest accredited judge for 12 years. As for partisan he is a
> constitutionalist. Of course that hook nosed cow Ginsburg has never
> shown any partisan leanings. You're so thick it's laughable.
>
> ,----
>| I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the
>| country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country,
>| it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want
>| to contemplate that.
> `----
>
> It takes a smarmy loser like you to fall for that Demorat circus. It was
> a hit job through and through. They tried to ruin a good man. I suspect
> you see yourself as the Windows QA equivalent of the Creepy Porn Lawyer
> Avenatti.
>
>
> You hate other people's success. I'm guessing that's why you suck up to
> the likes of turd and wRonG.
>
> It must suck to be you.

Democrats are nothing, if not lying, reptilian hypocrites

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471811

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2018-10-13 05:41 -0400
Message-ID<ppsfrc$ekb$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#471770
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Democrats are nothing, if not lying, reptilian hypocrites

You sure have a thing for reptiles, Ron.

C'mon, share the love with the Republicans and their destructive
Senate leader, Mitch, whose tactics have helped us get to the
mess we're in now.

-- 
No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of
absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream.
Hill House, not sane, stood by itself against its hills, holding darkness
within; it had stood so for eighty years and might stand for eighty more.
Within, walls continued upright, bricks met neatly, floors were firm, and
doors were sensibly shut; silence lay steadily against the wood and stone
of Hill House, and whatever walked there, walked alone.
		-- Shirley Jackson, "The Haunting of Hill House"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471815

FromSilicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com>
Date2018-10-13 12:13 +0200
Message-ID<877eimp31c.fsf@yahoo.com>
In reply to#471811
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:

> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Democrats are nothing, if not lying, reptilian hypocrites
>
> You sure have a thing for reptiles, Ron.
>
> C'mon, share the love with the Republicans and their destructive
> Senate leader, Mitch, whose tactics have helped us get to the
> mess we're in now.

There is no mess. The only mess is the smelly lesbians and their cucks
beating up old people on the streets of democrat run cities. I suspect
you are in Antifa. You're wimpy enough.

The US economy is strong, the respect others have for you has
increased. Obama ruined your country and basically gave a free pass to
ghettos and the pimps therein to get away with anything because they're
black. Those days are coming to an end.

MAGA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471817

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2018-10-13 05:59 -0400
Message-ID<ppsgs8$ekb$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#471815
Silicon Vee wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
>
>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Democrats are nothing, if not lying, reptilian hypocrites
>>
>> You sure have a thing for reptiles, Ron.
>>
>> C'mon, share the love with the Republicans and their destructive
>> Senate leader, Mitch, whose tactics have helped us get to the
>> mess we're in now.
>
> There is no mess. The only mess is the smelly lesbians and their cucks
> beating up old people on the streets of democrat run cities. I suspect
> you are in Antifa. You're wimpy enough.
>
> The US economy is strong, the respect others have for you has
> increased. Obama ruined your country and basically gave a free pass to
> ghettos and the pimps therein to get away with anything because they're
> black. Those days are coming to an end.
>
> MAGA

Ah, now I get it... you're a Chino/Russo troll-bot :-D

-- 
You too can wear a nose mitten.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471821

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2018-10-13 04:14 -0700
Message-ID<ef718feb-0c16-425f-9326-3fb36ee67cd5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471815
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 6:13:53 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
> 
> > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >
> >> Democrats are nothing, if not lying, reptilian hypocrites
> >
> > You sure have a thing for reptiles, Ron.
> >
> > C'mon, share the love with the Republicans and their destructive
> > Senate leader, Mitch, whose tactics have helped us get to the
> > mess we're in now.
> 
> There is no mess. 

On the contrary:  there's few (if any) moderates left in government
leadership, and even fewer bipartisan compromises actually getting
anything accomplished.  On top of that, the deficit has gotten even worse
and we're now in a period of rising interests rates, which makes servicing 
the debt even more expensive.  

> The only mess is the smelly lesbians and their cucks
> beating up old people on the streets of democrat run cities. I suspect
> you are in Antifa. You're wimpy enough.

Crass ad hominems ... and more evidence of partisanship.  QED.


> The US economy is strong,

Reality says otherwise, as illustrated by the Stock Market's DJIA taking
a -1000 point hit this week.  Motivationally, that's all about the economy
and future prospects -- and that huge sell-off wasn't because of optimism. 

Even your latest poster boy of Kavanaugh is living well above his own means,
with his financial disclosures revealing a debt:income ratio of roughly 5:1.

Plus in classical Federal OPSEC terms, that level of financial stress identifies him 
as a significant security risk, particularly for coercion from outside interests.  


> .. the respect others have for you has increased.

When you get literally laughed *at* while not telling a joke on a world stage ... nope.


>  Obama ruined your country and basically gave a free pass to
> ghettos and the pimps therein to get away with anything because they're
> black. Those days are coming to an end.
> 
> MAGA

The "End of Empire" warning signs are flashing as is illustrated by tirades such as 
the above, so we're going to have to once again mobilize the forces of democratic 
freedom to go literally shed blood to fight fascism.  Would have hoped that we had
adequately learned our lesson about this 75 years ago, but apparently not:  we're
now going to go make our children die due to our own hubris and irrational fears 
that others may actually finally gain equity in rights & opportunities, rather than
the privileged based system that's been institutionalized despite the Constitution.



-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471825

FromSilicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com>
Date2018-10-13 14:02 +0200
Message-ID<87efcu2gwk.fsf@yahoo.com>
In reply to#471821
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> writes:

> On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 6:13:53 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
>> 
>> > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> >
>> >> Democrats are nothing, if not lying, reptilian hypocrites
>> >
>> > You sure have a thing for reptiles, Ron.
>> >
>> > C'mon, share the love with the Republicans and their destructive
>> > Senate leader, Mitch, whose tactics have helped us get to the
>> > mess we're in now.
>> 
>> There is no mess. 
>
> On the contrary:  there's few (if any) moderates left in government
> leadership, and even fewer bipartisan compromises actually getting
> anything accomplished.  On top of that, the deficit has gotten even worse
> and we're now in a period of rising interests rates, which makes servicing 
> the debt even more expensive.  
>
>> The only mess is the smelly lesbians and their cucks
>> beating up old people on the streets of democrat run cities. I suspect
>> you are in Antifa. You're wimpy enough.
>
> Crass ad hominems ... and more evidence of partisanship.  QED.
>
>
>> The US economy is strong,
>
> Reality says otherwise, as illustrated by the Stock Market's DJIA taking
> a -1000 point hit this week.  Motivationally, that's all about the economy
> and future prospects -- and that huge sell-off wasn't because of
> optimism.

A week. That's  the Fed playing around and you know it. The bottom line is
its better to establish a solid home grown workforce than buying in
while paying fatties to lounge around watching Whoopie and the other
harridans on The View. It's over for the hysterical dems. They
overplayed their hand and know it. The racist diatribe from CNN
over Kanye West compounding their error. That "Negro has left the
plantation" and is thinking for himself. That's the problem with the
Democrats they want to control through fear and dependency. Keep them
down and assure them they'll get their meds. It's the classic drug
dealer scenario - a Stockholm syndrome type thing.

>
> Even your latest poster boy of Kavanaugh is living well above his own means,
> with his financial disclosures revealing a debt:income ratio of
> roughly 5:1.

If by poster boy you mean someone who topped his classes while also
growing up and drinking beer and then went on to be the highest rated
judge on the circuit then yes. I had you pegged as a little better than
a cuck like Linosuck and Snit who hate ANY success from their
betters. QAing Windows while pretending to be a 1337 Linux user does
that to beta males.

>
> Plus in classical Federal OPSEC terms, that level of financial stress identifies him 
> as a significant security risk, particularly for coercion from outside interests.  
>
>
>> .. the respect others have for you has increased.
>
> When you get literally laughed *at* while not telling a joke on a world stage ... nope.
>

You're reading the wrong press. I can assure you that European leaders
despised Obama but played along with this Ego so they could get better
deals. Deals which Trump is renegotiating. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471827

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-13 05:21 -0700
Message-ID<4f56ab26-9b3e-4cb2-9e13-cbf55be96ddf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471825
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 5:02:54 AM UTC-7, Silicon Vee wrote:
> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> writes:
> 
> > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 6:13:53 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:
> >> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
> >> 
> >> > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >> >
> >> >> Democrats are nothing, if not lying, reptilian hypocrites
> >> >
> >> > You sure have a thing for reptiles, Ron.
> >> >
> >> > C'mon, share the love with the Republicans and their destructive
> >> > Senate leader, Mitch, whose tactics have helped us get to the
> >> > mess we're in now.
> >> 
> >> There is no mess. 
> >
> > On the contrary:  there's few (if any) moderates left in government
> > leadership, and even fewer bipartisan compromises actually getting
> > anything accomplished.  On top of that, the deficit has gotten even worse
> > and we're now in a period of rising interests rates, which makes servicing 
> > the debt even more expensive.  
> >
> >> The only mess is the smelly lesbians and their cucks
> >> beating up old people on the streets of democrat run cities. I suspect
> >> you are in Antifa. You're wimpy enough.
> >
> > Crass ad hominems ... and more evidence of partisanship.  QED.
> >
> >
> >> The US economy is strong,
> >
> > Reality says otherwise, as illustrated by the Stock Market's DJIA taking
> > a -1000 point hit this week.  Motivationally, that's all about the economy
> > and future prospects -- and that huge sell-off wasn't because of
> > optimism.
> 
> A week. That's  the Fed playing around and you know it. The bottom line is
> its better to establish a solid home grown workforce than buying in
> while paying fatties to lounge around watching Whoopie and the other
> harridans on The View. It's over for the hysterical dems. They
> overplayed their hand and know it. The racist diatribe from CNN
> over Kanye West compounding their error. That "Negro has left the
> plantation" and is thinking for himself. That's the problem with the
> Democrats they want to control through fear and dependency. Keep them
> down and assure them they'll get their meds. It's the classic drug
> dealer scenario - a Stockholm syndrome type thing.
> 
> >
> > Even your latest poster boy of Kavanaugh is living well above his own means,
> > with his financial disclosures revealing a debt:income ratio of
> > roughly 5:1.
> 
> If by poster boy you mean someone who topped his classes while also
> growing up and drinking beer and then went on to be the highest rated
> judge on the circuit then yes. I had you pegged as a little better than
> a cuck like Linosuck and Snit who hate ANY success from their
> betters. QAing Windows while pretending to be a 1337 Linux user does
> that to beta males.
> 
> >
> > Plus in classical Federal OPSEC terms, that level of financial stress identifies him 
> > as a significant security risk, particularly for coercion from outside interests.  
> >
> >
> >> .. the respect others have for you has increased.
> >
> > When you get literally laughed *at* while not telling a joke on a world stage ... nope.
> >
> 
> You're reading the wrong press. I can assure you that European leaders
> despised Obama but played along with this Ego so they could get better
> deals. Deals which Trump is renegotiating.



This is merely an amusement of mine. All joking aside, what lie? 

He pretends that he uses Windows, while you know he never recorded it to get any real work done and actually used it. 

The guy is as well liked as pork pie in a mosque -- and with good cause. Klaus Schadenfreude shows that all of them are not automated because some of them are direct responses in very specific ways which proves they are a response. IOW, while some could be automated others are definitely not. 

Only what Klaus Schadenfreude wants matters to Klaus Schadenfreude. There is nothing Snit can do to change that. It's a trolling addiction and it is what it is. 

--
Live on Kickstarter!!
http://www.5z8.info/hateminorities_t7l3gt_linked-in-of-sex
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471900

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2018-10-13 13:48 -0700
Message-ID<1e46bdb0-c2c6-41f2-b5f0-b4e7b5499d6f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471825
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 8:02:54 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:
> -hh writes:
> 
> > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 6:13:53 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:
> >> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
> >> 
> >> > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >> >
> >> >> Democrats are nothing, if not lying, reptilian hypocrites
> >> >
> >> > You sure have a thing for reptiles, Ron.
> >> >
> >> > C'mon, share the love with the Republicans and their destructive
> >> > Senate leader, Mitch, whose tactics have helped us get to the
> >> > mess we're in now.
> >> 
> >> There is no mess. 
> >
> > On the contrary:  there's few (if any) moderates left in government
> > leadership, and even fewer bipartisan compromises actually getting
> > anything accomplished.  On top of that, the deficit has gotten even worse
> > and we're now in a period of rising interests rates, which makes servicing 
> > the debt even more expensive.  
> >
> >> The only mess is the smelly lesbians and their cucks
> >> beating up old people on the streets of democrat run cities. I suspect
> >> you are in Antifa. You're wimpy enough.
> >
> > Crass ad hominems ... and more evidence of partisanship.  QED.
> >
> >
> >> The US economy is strong,
> >
> > Reality says otherwise, as illustrated by the Stock Market's DJIA taking
> > a -1000 point hit this week.  Motivationally, that's all about the economy
> > and future prospects -- and that huge sell-off wasn't because of
> > optimism.
> 
> A week. That's  the Fed playing around and you know it. 

Oh really?  So it was the Fed who increased FY18 deficit spending?   

And it was also the Fed who passed a "sugar rush" tax cut bill last December?  

And it was even the Fed who upset markets by yammering about how their
own rate hike is a horribly bad thing to do?

Plus it was the Fed who started an international trade war .. and then forgot to 
go to the negotiation table?  The first stage of price hikes are going to start to
really hit just after the elections - - in time for Black Friday & Christmas, ho ho!

Yeah, it was definitely the Fed alright!   

Time will tell...but the Market votes with its dollars, not fantasy.

Unfortunately, it really ain't looking all that rosy of an economy.  The US "sugar
rush" is going to end pretty soon and we've still not seen robust improvements
in wages.  The overall world economy is slowing & some governments are already 
in trouble with their budgets, and the USA simply isn't positioned to really afford 
making another round of stimulus next year...nor the year after that ... due to our 
growth in debt load during a "good" period when we classically should be in a
surplus.  And despite the Fed slowly ratcheting up rates, they're still historically 
quite low, so there really isn't all that much margin to cut them as a stimulus 
measure either.   The overall ramifications of all of this is that the next recession 
is going to be substantially more painful, particularly for the low & middle class,
than the 2007/2008 one was, especially if current rumblings about the Republicans 
trying to make more cuts to social safety nets. 

 
> The bottom line is
> its better to establish a solid home grown workforce than buying in
> while paying fatties to lounge around watching Whoopie and the other
> harridans on The View. It's over for the hysterical dems. They
> overplayed their hand and know it. 

Umm...besides ranting at a TV show, just what were you trying to say?  


> The racist diatribe from CNN
> over Kanye West compounding their error. That "Negro has left the
> plantation" and is thinking for himself.

West?  Please  - he's nothing more than a provocateur playing games.
For example, notice how suddenly he dropped his "never smiles" routine?  


>  That's the problem with the Democrats they want to control through fear
> and dependency. 

Nope, it hasn't been the Democrats who have been playing the Fear card,
particularly since 9/11.  Just as it wasn't Democrats who went on a night
march carrying torches while chanting "Jews will not replace us".  

> Keep them down and assure them they'll get their meds. It's the classic drug
> dealer scenario - a Stockholm syndrome type thing.

Opiods from Big Pharma ... so just what has the current Congress & Administration
done under Republican control to take them to the woodshed?  Else, they're complicit.


> > Even your latest poster boy of Kavanaugh is living well above his own means,
> > with his financial disclosures revealing a debt:income ratio of
> > roughly 5:1.
> 
> If by poster boy you mean someone who topped his classes while also
> growing up and drinking beer and then went on to be the highest rated
> judge on the circuit ...

I was talking about finances - which is why you're trying to change the subject.

> > Plus in classical Federal OPSEC terms, that level of financial stress identifies him 
> > as a significant security risk, particularly for coercion from outside interests.  

Lack of response - - noted.   My suggestion is to keep an eye on his finances, 
for you may find that just like Ted Cruz, the numbers don't add up, which means
that someone OWNS him.  


> >> .. the respect others have for you has increased.
> >
> > When you get literally laughed *at* while not telling a joke on a world stage ... nope.
> 
> You're reading the wrong press. 

Press?  Nope: firsthand knowledge while working professionally as a US Delegate
meeting with other Nations' similarly officially assigned representatives.  Did this
under both Republican & Democratic administrations and it was quite revealing.

> I can assure you that European leaders despised Obama ...

You weren't there to see their reactions firsthand.  I was.

> Deals which Trump is renegotiating.

Funny that:  the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA was actually 
unchanged -  but overall, worse than what he would have gotten if he had
simply done nothing and stuck with it with the TPP.

And we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ... 
the latter of which already has had its ticking clock rung on the first round
and the second ... and the deadline for even more pain is coming up soon. 

But Mr Fearless Leader tries to snowjob everyone with a mantra that paying
a Tariff is somehow okay because a Tariff payment isn't a "Tax"...

...that's nice, but its still more of *your* money coming out of *your* damn pocket.
And not one penny of it is deductible at all off of your personal income taxes.  
    

-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471902

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-13 14:13 -0700
Message-ID<5dd2bbdc-5472-4a62-bc55-6c75d2076d01@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471900
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 1:48:20 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
> On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 8:02:54 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:
> > -hh writes:
> > 
> > > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 6:13:53 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:
> > >> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
> > >> 
> > >> > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Democrats are nothing, if not lying, reptilian hypocrites
> > >> >
> > >> > You sure have a thing for reptiles, Ron.
> > >> >
> > >> > C'mon, share the love with the Republicans and their destructive
> > >> > Senate leader, Mitch, whose tactics have helped us get to the
> > >> > mess we're in now.
> > >> 
> > >> There is no mess. 
> > >
> > > On the contrary:  there's few (if any) moderates left in government
> > > leadership, and even fewer bipartisan compromises actually getting
> > > anything accomplished.  On top of that, the deficit has gotten even worse
> > > and we're now in a period of rising interests rates, which makes servicing 
> > > the debt even more expensive.  
> > >
> > >> The only mess is the smelly lesbians and their cucks
> > >> beating up old people on the streets of democrat run cities. I suspect
> > >> you are in Antifa. You're wimpy enough.
> > >
> > > Crass ad hominems ... and more evidence of partisanship.  QED.
> > >
> > >
> > >> The US economy is strong,
> > >
> > > Reality says otherwise, as illustrated by the Stock Market's DJIA taking
> > > a -1000 point hit this week.  Motivationally, that's all about the economy
> > > and future prospects -- and that huge sell-off wasn't because of
> > > optimism.
> > 
> > A week. That's  the Fed playing around and you know it. 
> 
> Oh really?  So it was the Fed who increased FY18 deficit spending?   
> 
> And it was also the Fed who passed a "sugar rush" tax cut bill last December?  
> 
> And it was even the Fed who upset markets by yammering about how their
> own rate hike is a horribly bad thing to do?
> 
> Plus it was the Fed who started an international trade war .. and then forgot to 
> go to the negotiation table?  The first stage of price hikes are going to start to
> really hit just after the elections - - in time for Black Friday & Christmas, ho ho!
> 
> Yeah, it was definitely the Fed alright!   
> 
> Time will tell...but the Market votes with its dollars, not fantasy.
> 
> Unfortunately, it really ain't looking all that rosy of an economy.  The US "sugar
> rush" is going to end pretty soon and we've still not seen robust improvements
> in wages.  The overall world economy is slowing & some governments are already 
> in trouble with their budgets, and the USA simply isn't positioned to really afford 
> making another round of stimulus next year...nor the year after that ... due to our 
> growth in debt load during a "good" period when we classically should be in a
> surplus.  And despite the Fed slowly ratcheting up rates, they're still historically 
> quite low, so there really isn't all that much margin to cut them as a stimulus 
> measure either.   The overall ramifications of all of this is that the next recession 
> is going to be substantially more painful, particularly for the low & middle class,
> than the 2007/2008 one was, especially if current rumblings about the Republicans 
> trying to make more cuts to social safety nets. 
> 
>  
> > The bottom line is
> > its better to establish a solid home grown workforce than buying in
> > while paying fatties to lounge around watching Whoopie and the other
> > harridans on The View. It's over for the hysterical dems. They
> > overplayed their hand and know it. 
> 
> Umm...besides ranting at a TV show, just what were you trying to say?  
> 
> 
> > The racist diatribe from CNN
> > over Kanye West compounding their error. That "Negro has left the
> > plantation" and is thinking for himself.
> 
> West?  Please  - he's nothing more than a provocateur playing games.
> For example, notice how suddenly he dropped his "never smiles" routine?  
> 
> 
> >  That's the problem with the Democrats they want to control through fear
> > and dependency. 
> 
> Nope, it hasn't been the Democrats who have been playing the Fear card,
> particularly since 9/11.  Just as it wasn't Democrats who went on a night
> march carrying torches while chanting "Jews will not replace us".  
> 
> > Keep them down and assure them they'll get their meds. It's the classic drug
> > dealer scenario - a Stockholm syndrome type thing.
> 
> Opiods from Big Pharma ... so just what has the current Congress & Administration
> done under Republican control to take them to the woodshed?  Else, they're complicit.
> 
> 
> > > Even your latest poster boy of Kavanaugh is living well above his own means,
> > > with his financial disclosures revealing a debt:income ratio of
> > > roughly 5:1.
> > 
> > If by poster boy you mean someone who topped his classes while also
> > growing up and drinking beer and then went on to be the highest rated
> > judge on the circuit ...
> 
> I was talking about finances - which is why you're trying to change the subject.
> 
> > > Plus in classical Federal OPSEC terms, that level of financial stress identifies him 
> > > as a significant security risk, particularly for coercion from outside interests.  
> 
> Lack of response - - noted.   My suggestion is to keep an eye on his finances, 
> for you may find that just like Ted Cruz, the numbers don't add up, which means
> that someone OWNS him.  
> 
> 
> > >> .. the respect others have for you has increased.
> > >
> > > When you get literally laughed *at* while not telling a joke on a world stage ... nope.
> > 
> > You're reading the wrong press. 
> 
> Press?  Nope: firsthand knowledge while working professionally as a US Delegate
> meeting with other Nations' similarly officially assigned representatives.  Did this
> under both Republican & Democratic administrations and it was quite revealing.
> 
> > I can assure you that European leaders despised Obama ...
> 
> You weren't there to see their reactions firsthand.  I was.
> 
> > Deals which Trump is renegotiating.
> 
> Funny that:  the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA was actually 
> unchanged -  but overall, worse than what he would have gotten if he had
> simply done nothing and stuck with it with the TPP.
> 
> And we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ... 
> the latter of which already has had its ticking clock rung on the first round
> and the second ... and the deadline for even more pain is coming up soon. 
> 
> But Mr Fearless Leader tries to snowjob everyone with a mantra that paying
> a Tariff is somehow okay because a Tariff payment isn't a "Tax"...
> 
> ...that's nice, but its still more of *your* money coming out of *your* damn pocket.
> And not one penny of it is deductible at all off of your personal income taxes.  
>     
> 
> -hh



The herd's done a pretty good job with a takeoff of Markova chains to produce texts which are hard to distinguish from my posts. But when the charts were produced, it turns out beyond any doubt, Klaus 'Super Troll' Schadenfreude was far more "fanatical" than he admitted. 

Dropping support for 16 bit apps is obvious. The guy is as popular as ants at a picnic -- and with good cause. 

I think we have two different perspectives about Klaus 'Super Troll' Schadenfreude. The cult-like herd of convenient friends value conformity in both their lives and their computer systems. 

-- 
Get Rich Slow!
https://youtu.be/r7wys2JvBD0
http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_j6f7mm_gruesome-gunshot-wounds
http://www.5z8.info/warez_w2t4ge_girlsgonewildpart1.wmv
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471908

Fromproletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org>
Date2018-10-13 18:45 -0400
Message-ID<5qbk31fv4buu$.18whx8y9ok9r3$.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#471900
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:48:17 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote:

> On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 8:02:54 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:

> Lack of response - - noted.   My suggestion is to keep an eye on his finances, 
> for you may find that just like Ted Cruz, the numbers don't add up, which means
> that someone OWNS him.  

My suggestion is to start with the Clintons.
Why they aren't in jail remains a mystery. 

Clinton Cash is a good starting point.

http://www.clintoncashbook.com/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5673884/

And when you tire of that one, you can dig into the Clinton Body Count and
try and explain away the unusually high number of people associated with
the Clintons that have met their demise.

Again, why they aren't in jail remains a mystery. My suspician is that they
have the goods if you will on some very powerful people, including Trump,
Cruz and others.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471910

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-13 16:03 -0700
Message-ID<7c19b81d-4abe-4c44-b1ab-8f28500a0bec@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471908
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 3:45:23 PM UTC-7, proletariat wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:48:17 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 8:02:54 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:
> 
> > Lack of response - - noted.   My suggestion is to keep an eye on his finances, 
> > for you may find that just like Ted Cruz, the numbers don't add up, which means
> > that someone OWNS him.  
> 
> My suggestion is to start with the Clintons.
> Why they aren't in jail remains a mystery. 
> 
> Clinton Cash is a good starting point.
> 
> http://www.clintoncashbook.com/
> 
> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5673884/
> 
> And when you tire of that one, you can dig into the Clinton Body Count and
> try and explain away the unusually high number of people associated with
> the Clintons that have met their demise.
> 
> Again, why they aren't in jail remains a mystery. My suspician is that they
> have the goods if you will on some very powerful people, including Trump,
> Cruz and others.



Just give it up already. You're again trying to bolster yourself beyond your grade. You're the court jester and your many poorly done challenges show this. After ignoring all the socks from Chris Ahlstrom, it's just two trolls making 95% of the trollcrap. It is blatant. And both completely mentally ill dingbats. At one point, he said a COLA denizen was "obsessing" over him, which was shown to be merely him posting to himself. 

Unfortunately there are too many "Chris Ahlstrom is our hero" Linux users and not enough users with enough understanding to help the people with old computers. 

Can you get a little less dense? Chris Ahlstrom should realize everyone knows he is just lying. 

--
Live on Kickstarter
https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471929

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-13 21:12 -0700
Message-ID<20bac1ff-c9de-4bf9-9215-a8a84d49bb28@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471910
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 4:03:07 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 3:45:23 PM UTC-7, proletariat wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:48:17 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote:
> > 
> > > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 8:02:54 AM UTC-4, Silicon Vee wrote:
> > 
> > > Lack of response - - noted.   My suggestion is to keep an eye on his finances, 
> > > for you may find that just like Ted Cruz, the numbers don't add up, which means
> > > that someone OWNS him.  
> > 
> > My suggestion is to start with the Clintons.
> > Why they aren't in jail remains a mystery. 
> > 
> > Clinton Cash is a good starting point.
> > 
> > http://www.clintoncashbook.com/
> > 
> > https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5673884/
> > 
> > And when you tire of that one, you can dig into the Clinton Body Count and
> > try and explain away the unusually high number of people associated with
> > the Clintons that have met their demise.
> > 
> > Again, why they aren't in jail remains a mystery. My suspician is that they
> > have the goods if you will on some very powerful people, including Trump,
> > Cruz and others.
> 
> 
> 
> Just give it up already. You're again trying to bolster yourself beyond your grade. You're the court jester and your many poorly done challenges show this. After ignoring all the socks from Chris Ahlstrom, it's just two trolls making 95% of the trollcrap. It is blatant. And both completely mentally ill dingbats. At one point, he said a COLA denizen was "obsessing" over him, which was shown to be merely him posting to himself. 
> 
> Unfortunately there are too many "Chris Ahlstrom is our hero" Linux users and not enough users with enough understanding to help the people with old computers. 
> 
> Can you get a little less dense? Chris Ahlstrom should realize everyone knows he is just lying. 
> 
> --
> Live on Kickstarter
> https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0
> Jonas Eklundh Communication



A shadow of reason, projected incorrectly, at the wrong time. 

You haven't been tracking him to determine the depths of the guy's descent. If Klaus Schadenfreude has 'some-file.pdf' open in a word processor such as emacs and you want to change its name to 'linux.doc' via a proxy icon, that might be OK. Dropping support for Mac Classic is what it comes down to. Takuya Saitoh's posts are quite fully disingenuous. There's no dispute that as soon as any forgiven 'plonked person' does anything to wound the namby-pamby's feelings that they'll be reblocked. 

Klaus Schadenfreude just wiped the floor with Takuya Saitoh. 

--
Puppy Videos!
http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_o8n9lg_racist-raps
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471925 — Who isn't "owned", you ?!

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-10-13 20:20 -0700
SubjectWho isn't "owned", you ?!
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.13--8.20pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#471900
You (Hugh) wrote:
> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].  

Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.

Who isn't "owned", you ?!

> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA 
> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ... 

Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?

It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.

What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?

  WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471927 — Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?!

Fromproletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org>
Date2018-10-13 23:51 -0400
SubjectRe: Who isn't "owned", you ?!
Message-ID<1fw86pscgcvw4$.1azu1ju4k34w7$.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#471925
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  wrote:

> You (Hugh) wrote:
>> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].  
> 
> Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
> We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
> 
> Who isn't "owned", you ?!
> 
>> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA 
>> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
>> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ... 
> 
> Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
> 
> It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
> 
> What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
> 
>   WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism
You are correct.
Take a look at Jeb Busch for example:

https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/30/418895297/jeb-bushs-wealth-skyrocketed-after-leaving-governors-office

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471931 — Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?!

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-13 21:43 -0700
SubjectRe: Who isn't "owned", you ?!
Message-ID<56526bcd-2a60-41f6-a052-24845ae99b67@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471927
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 8:51:36 PM UTC-7, proletariat wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  wrote:
> 
> > You (Hugh) wrote:
> >> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].  
> > 
> > Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
> > We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
> > 
> > Who isn't "owned", you ?!
> > 
> >> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA 
> >> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
> >> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ... 
> > 
> > Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
> > 
> > It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
> > 
> > What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
> > 
> >   WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism
> You are correct.
> Take a look at Jeb Busch for example:
> 
> https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/30/418895297/jeb-bushs-wealth-skyrocketed-after-leaving-governors-office



Generally, Snit (a real advocate) would not call a post like Klaus Schadenfreude's posts a fabrication until you negate it and Klaus Schadenfreude responds with the same thing again without offering any evidence. In fact Klaus Schadenfreude's lies became directed at me. So obviously I regret assisting Klaus Schadenfreude. While I am sure his shills approved of it, he has taught me to never try to appease a troll. 

Just some names Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll has used
    "Evil" John *
    "Evil" Snit *
    Big Crotch on a Small Fish
    Cornelius Munshower
    CSMA Moderator
    Edward Stanfield
    Fretwiz *
    Hitman Hero
    Measles
    Petruzzellis Kids
    Sigmond
    Slaveen
    Smit
    Steve C *
    Steve Camoll *
    Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
    Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
    Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
    Steve Carroll's Dog *
    Steve Carrolll *
    Steve Carrroll *
    Yevette Owens
    Yobo_Obyo


I can squash you with my brain. 



-- 
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!!
https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4
http://www.5z8.info/titstitstitstits_j7t4bl_stalin
https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#472159 — Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?!

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-15 11:21 -0400
SubjectRe: Who isn't "owned", you ?!
Message-ID<pq2bai$i7p$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#471927
On 10/13/2018 11:51 PM, proletariat wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  wrote:
> 
>> You (Hugh) wrote:
>>> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].
>>
>> Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
>> We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
>>
>> Who isn't "owned", you ?!
>>
>>> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA
>>> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
>>> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ...
>>
>> Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
>>
>> It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
>>
>> What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
>>
>>    WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism
> You are correct.
> Take a look at Jeb Busch for example:
> 
> https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/30/418895297/jeb-bushs-wealth-skyrocketed-after-leaving-governors-office
> 
Whose wealth does NOT skyrocket after leaving government? Shit. Look at 
the clintons who suddenly went from poor folks with a few hundred K to 
millions overnight. No collusions I'm sure.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#472162 — Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?!

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-15 08:51 -0700
SubjectRe: Who isn't "owned", you ?!
Message-ID<9417925a-f005-42c5-9ee3-f8ff3f051b65@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#472159
On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 8:21:59 AM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 10/13/2018 11:51 PM, proletariat wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  wrote:
> > 
> >> You (Hugh) wrote:
> >>> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].
> >>
> >> Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
> >> We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
> >>
> >> Who isn't "owned", you ?!
> >>
> >>> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA
> >>> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
> >>> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ...
> >>
> >> Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
> >>
> >> It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
> >>
> >> What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
> >>
> >>    WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism
> > You are correct.
> > Take a look at Jeb Busch for example:
> > 
> > https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/30/418895297/jeb-bushs-wealth-skyrocketed-after-leaving-governors-office
> > 
> Whose wealth does NOT skyrocket after leaving government? Shit. Look at 
> the clintons who suddenly went from poor folks with a few hundred K to 
> millions overnight. No collusions I'm sure.



Why would you want to limit all scripts on Linux to what can be done on Windows? 

Everyone is Klaus Schadenfreude -- the oldest gag in the book. You can say I am a monkey wrench for all I care. I bet we have two different notions entirely. For crying out loud, hombre... even you have plonked that numbnuts. Given what Klaus Schadenfreude is nobody could condemn you for pushing to be rid of his senseless form of farce. All that Klaus Schadenfreude cares about is that Klaus Schadenfreude gets to express his poorly written flyer and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Steve Petruzzellis is an innocent patsy on the other end of the phone is his motivation. 

Klaus Schadenfreude asked to be rated according to direct statistical evidence, which Steve Petruzzellis obliged him with. 

--
Get Rich Slow
http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_j3m3lg_whitepower
https://youtu.be/IhOfBmWwCVY
http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#472178 — Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?!

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-15 10:40 -0700
SubjectRe: Who isn't "owned", you ?!
Message-ID<e24479db-2a86-404f-a0e8-ebb3067e8bb7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#472162
On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 8:51:30 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 8:21:59 AM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> > On 10/13/2018 11:51 PM, proletariat wrote:
> > > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  wrote:
> > > 
> > >> You (Hugh) wrote:
> > >>> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].
> > >>
> > >> Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
> > >> We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
> > >>
> > >> Who isn't "owned", you ?!
> > >>
> > >>> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA
> > >>> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
> > >>> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ...
> > >>
> > >> Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
> > >>
> > >> It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
> > >>
> > >> What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
> > >>
> > >>    WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism
> > > You are correct.
> > > Take a look at Jeb Busch for example:
> > > 
> > > https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/30/418895297/jeb-bushs-wealth-skyrocketed-after-leaving-governors-office
> > > 
> > Whose wealth does NOT skyrocket after leaving government? Shit. Look at 
> > the clintons who suddenly went from poor folks with a few hundred K to 
> > millions overnight. No collusions I'm sure.
> 
> 
> 
> Why would you want to limit all scripts on Linux to what can be done on Windows? 
> 
> Everyone is Klaus Schadenfreude -- the oldest gag in the book. You can say I am a monkey wrench for all I care. I bet we have two different notions entirely. For crying out loud, hombre... even you have plonked that numbnuts. Given what Klaus Schadenfreude is nobody could condemn you for pushing to be rid of his senseless form of farce. All that Klaus Schadenfreude cares about is that Klaus Schadenfreude gets to express his poorly written flyer and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Steve Petruzzellis is an innocent patsy on the other end of the phone is his motivation. 
> 
> Klaus Schadenfreude asked to be rated according to direct statistical evidence, which Steve Petruzzellis obliged him with. 
> 
> --
> Get Rich Slow
> http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_j3m3lg_whitepower
> https://youtu.be/IhOfBmWwCVY
> http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit
> Jonas Eklundh Communication



It was Flooder Steve Carroll who forged me (and others) and admitted it. 

Geeeejus! How did Flooder Steve Carroll get _so_ self-centered he concludes everything is about his trolling?? Sandman trolls Flooder Steve Carroll. Here is a list of names Jonas Eklundh has admitted he attributes to Flooder Steve Carroll "Cactus Pete", "Donald", "Donald Miller", "Horace McSwain", "Hymen", "meat", "Mike Weaver", "Modena IV Drid", "Omar Murad Asfour", "Rhino Plastee", "Soapy", "SopwithCamel", "Sunny Day", "Takuya Saitoh", "The Letter Q", "tmelmosfire", "zevon". All total lies, of course. Flooder Steve Carroll claims to be the screencasting teacher. Let us see him put up an example minus the automated loops.

Until Flooder Steve Carroll offers up his 'top-of-the-line' Windows solution for evaluation, there is no threat, just boisterous claims. 

It is a piece of cake to essentially lie by focusing on a handful of exceptions unrepresentative from what's typical. What is more important from an honest advocates perspective are the expected uses. 

Almost all people in this forum do programming either as a pastime or as a career, so I am skeptical more than a few consider writing macros to be "a black art". The Mac has better media tools. Which just pisses Flooder Steve Carroll off. 

--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web