Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #468142 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-22 09:36 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 907 — 42 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
somebody running Snit over in a rental pickup truck from Lowes would be viewed as solid community service Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 08:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 10:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 15:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 07:47 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:24 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 05:55 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:00 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 05:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
All educated people agree that Snit is the very definition of insanity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 05:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:10 -0500
Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:21 +0000
Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 06:42 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 10:05 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:00 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:10 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:48 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 05:39 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:50 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
"Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-30 07:13 -0700
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-30 20:14 -0700
Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:58 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:54 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700
Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 04:14 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:28 -0500
Mr. ChrisV, my publicist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 07:27 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:13 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:06 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:08 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:15 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:20 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:45 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:50 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:59 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:10 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:22 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:05 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 22:58 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:34 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 06:02 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:42 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:02 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:00 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:17 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:23 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:52 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:04 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:28 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 13:54 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:55 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:12 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:45 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 18:12 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:26 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 05:31 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:13 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:23 -0500
Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 21:27 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-10-02 07:59 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 01:19 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:55 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 12:07 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:35 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:38 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:58 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:07 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:15 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:44 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 07:20 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:15 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:51 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 22:57 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:28 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:41 +0000
Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:57 -0700
Re: Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 07:42 -0700
Re: Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 07:52 -0700
Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:36 -0700
I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:43 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:34 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 01:30 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:45 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 08:50 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 14:15 +0000
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 08:23 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:22 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:28 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:18 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:40 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 14:22 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:39 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 21:58 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:05 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:31 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 20:55 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:44 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 13:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:39 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:23 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:47 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:46 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 16:05 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:41 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:56 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-02 06:30 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 06:48 -0700
Depending on how you define the word "is"... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 06:58 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 08:49 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 09:54 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 13:47 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:53 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:07 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:10 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:29 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:12 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:43 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:04 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 13:40 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 17:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:43 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 10:03 -0500
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 06:26 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 00:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:13 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 02:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 06:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 08:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:28 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 16:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 01:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 04:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 01:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 17:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 02:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 04:13 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 03:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:23 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 07:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 04:45 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:27 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
Re: The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:34 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 07:21 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:48 -0700
Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 21:44 -0700
Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:03 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:42 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:16 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:25 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 04:10 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:14 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:22 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:27 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
Re: Trump is a salesman. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:01 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 01:49 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 08:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 08:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 05:23 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:24 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:48 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:42 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:21 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:36 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:46 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:17 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 21:22 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
"IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:19 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 03:38 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 10:54 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:37 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:55 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:51 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
Democratic Socialists are Tards ... Just thought that the COLA Fruits might want to know Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:59 -0700
Re: Democratic Socialists are Tards ... Just thought that the COLA Fruits might want to know Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:17 -0700
Second verse, same as the first ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:26 -0700
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 09:50 -0400
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:38 +0000
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 08:02 -0700
Second verse, same as the first ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 09:20 -0700
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 09:36 -0700
Page 14 of 46 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 46 Next page →
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361b6981330db046994d05@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #469669 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <posfhn$mhp$131@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 22:25:48 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pos7c6$mhp$127@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:37:42 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> > >> >> > If I was _ kidnapped, like that, I'd call 911. > >> >> > I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. > >> >> > >> >> speaking up would get you in deep trouble with the parents. > >> > > >> > Right, she knew she was in the wrong place, > >> > at the wrong time, doing the wrong thing. > >> > > >> > And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by the gang that > >> > pushed her into the room and locked the door... -- as if she had > >> > nothing to do with it, nothing at all. > >> > > >> > She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. > >> > >> Did she consent to be groped and undressed? No? Then she was innocent. > >> > >> >> > She's trying to attach herself to a greater man, to sink him down > >> >> > to her level, at the bottom of the sea. > >> >> > >> >> he?s not the superior, especially after his bad behavior last week > >> > > >> > Were Kavanaugh the raging, drunk, incel you imagine, > >> > he would've have been locked away, long ago. > >> > >> We wish. > >> > >> > Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine, > >> > she would have risen to greater Heights. > >> > >> Oh, how cute -- you still believe in meritocracy. :) > > > > And you still believe in guilt by unfounded and meritless accusations. > > No. The standard of evidence in criminal trials should remain "beyond a > reasonable doubt". I have never claimed otherwise. There's plenty to doubt. You not only couldn't get a conviction in any US court, you couldn't even find a DA willing to file charges, because he'd get laughed right out of the courtroom. It's getting late. Time to pop my nightly benzo and call it a day. Will you be joining me soon? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <poujvf$at2$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469689 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:15:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <posfhn$mhp$131@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 22:25:48 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> > by Checkmate! In article <pos7c6$mhp$127@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> > @gmail.invalid says... >> > >> > >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> >> melt! >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:37:42 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > If I was _ kidnapped, like that, I'd call 911. >> >> >> > I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. >> >> >> >> >> >> speaking up would get you in deep trouble with the parents. >> >> > >> >> > Right, she knew she was in the wrong place, >> >> > at the wrong time, doing the wrong thing. >> >> > >> >> > And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by the gang that >> >> > pushed her into the room and locked the door... -- as if she had >> >> > nothing to do with it, nothing at all. >> >> > >> >> > She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. >> >> >> >> Did she consent to be groped and undressed? No? Then she was >> >> innocent. >> >> >> >> >> > She's trying to attach herself to a greater man, to sink him >> >> >> > down to her level, at the bottom of the sea. >> >> >> >> >> >> he?s not the superior, especially after his bad behavior last >> >> >> week >> >> > >> >> > Were Kavanaugh the raging, drunk, incel you imagine, >> >> > he would've have been locked away, long ago. >> >> >> >> We wish. >> >> >> >> > Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine, >> >> > she would have risen to greater Heights. >> >> >> >> Oh, how cute -- you still believe in meritocracy. :) >> > >> > And you still believe in guilt by unfounded and meritless >> > accusations. >> >> No. The standard of evidence in criminal trials should remain "beyond a >> reasonable doubt". I have never claimed otherwise. > > There's plenty to doubt. You not only couldn't get a conviction in any > US court, you couldn't even find a DA willing to file charges, because > he'd get laughed right out of the courtroom. Are you talking about Kavanaugh? Because he's not on trial -- he's undergoing a *job interview* to decide whether to give him a *promotion*. To a position that requires the highest of ethical and moral standards. If anything, the real disqualifier here is the repeated lying under oath, which is easily proved and absolutely cannot be tolerated in any member of the judicial branch. > It's getting late. Time to pop my nightly benzo and call it a day. > Will you be j<NUTKICK!> What was that? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361c8394f2f72557989d68@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #469989 |
In article <poujvf$at2$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:15:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <posfhn$mhp$131@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 22:25:48 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article <pos7c6$mhp$127@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >> > @gmail.invalid says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >> melt! > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:37:42 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >> > If I was _ kidnapped, like that, I'd call 911. > >> >> >> > I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> speaking up would get you in deep trouble with the parents. > >> >> > > >> >> > Right, she knew she was in the wrong place, > >> >> > at the wrong time, doing the wrong thing. > >> >> > > >> >> > And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by the gang that > >> >> > pushed her into the room and locked the door... -- as if she had > >> >> > nothing to do with it, nothing at all. > >> >> > > >> >> > She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. > >> >> > >> >> Did she consent to be groped and undressed? No? Then she was > >> >> innocent. > >> >> > >> >> >> > She's trying to attach herself to a greater man, to sink him > >> >> >> > down to her level, at the bottom of the sea. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> he?s not the superior, especially after his bad behavior last > >> >> >> week > >> >> > > >> >> > Were Kavanaugh the raging, drunk, incel you imagine, > >> >> > he would've have been locked away, long ago. > >> >> > >> >> We wish. > >> >> > >> >> > Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine, > >> >> > she would have risen to greater Heights. > >> >> > >> >> Oh, how cute -- you still believe in meritocracy. :) > >> > > >> > And you still believe in guilt by unfounded and meritless > >> > accusations. > >> > >> No. The standard of evidence in criminal trials should remain "beyond a > >> reasonable doubt". I have never claimed otherwise. > > > > There's plenty to doubt. You not only couldn't get a conviction in any > > US court, you couldn't even find a DA willing to file charges, because > > he'd get laughed right out of the courtroom. > > Are you talking about Kavanaugh? Because he's not on trial -- he's > undergoing a *job interview* to decide whether to give him a *promotion*. > To a position that requires the highest of ethical and moral standards. If > anything, the real disqualifier here is the repeated lying under oath, > which is easily proved and absolutely cannot be tolerated in any member of > the judicial branch. But it's ok for the democrapper senate to do it. > > > It's getting late. Time to pop my nightly benzo and call it a day. > > Will you be j<NUTKICK!> > > What was that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 20:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <212b318a-8119-4216-a72a-d23dcda852c3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469991 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 7:19:21 PM UTC-7, Skeeter wrote: > In article <poujvf$at2$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... > > > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:15:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > > Checkmate! In article <posfhn$mhp$131@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > > >> melt! > > >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 22:25:48 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > >> > > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > > >> > by Checkmate! In article <pos7c6$mhp$127@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > >> > @gmail.invalid says... > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > > >> >> melt! > > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:37:42 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > If I was _ kidnapped, like that, I'd call 911. > > >> >> >> > I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> speaking up would get you in deep trouble with the parents. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Right, she knew she was in the wrong place, > > >> >> > at the wrong time, doing the wrong thing. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by the gang that > > >> >> > pushed her into the room and locked the door... -- as if she had > > >> >> > nothing to do with it, nothing at all. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. > > >> >> > > >> >> Did she consent to be groped and undressed? No? Then she was > > >> >> innocent. > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > She's trying to attach herself to a greater man, to sink him > > >> >> >> > down to her level, at the bottom of the sea. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> he?s not the superior, especially after his bad behavior last > > >> >> >> week > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Were Kavanaugh the raging, drunk, incel you imagine, > > >> >> > he would've have been locked away, long ago. > > >> >> > > >> >> We wish. > > >> >> > > >> >> > Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine, > > >> >> > she would have risen to greater Heights. > > >> >> > > >> >> Oh, how cute -- you still believe in meritocracy. :) > > >> > > > >> > And you still believe in guilt by unfounded and meritless > > >> > accusations. > > >> > > >> No. The standard of evidence in criminal trials should remain "beyond a > > >> reasonable doubt". I have never claimed otherwise. > > > > > > There's plenty to doubt. You not only couldn't get a conviction in any > > > US court, you couldn't even find a DA willing to file charges, because > > > he'd get laughed right out of the courtroom. > > > > Are you talking about Kavanaugh? Because he's not on trial -- he's > > undergoing a *job interview* to decide whether to give him a *promotion*. > > To a position that requires the highest of ethical and moral standards. If > > anything, the real disqualifier here is the repeated lying under oath, > > which is easily proved and absolutely cannot be tolerated in any member of > > the judicial branch. > > But it's ok for the democrapper senate to do it. > > > > > It's getting late. Time to pop my nightly benzo and call it a day. > > > Will you be j<NUTKICK!> > > > > What was that? I will destroy beetles with my thoughts. Thus, my first statement stands true and correct. A sustained, relentless, posting itch, despite nothing to say - basically gunky Mac-using cartographers, and satisfactorily-waxed fish, deactivated with wit for his own private purposes. He is as incompetent as Klaus Schadenfreude. Klaus Schadenfreude shows this is an insomniac troll writing because some of them are keyed in to posts that occur in very specific ways with clear thought behind them. Which can only be Klaus Schadenfreude. My view is that we should ALL report the flooding and then it will stop. -- E-commerce Simplified http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <pouohh$69c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469989 |
On 10/1/2018 7:08 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:15:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <posfhn$mhp$131@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 22:25:48 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>> by Checkmate! In article <pos7c6$mhp$127@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:37:42 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> If I was _ kidnapped, like that, I'd call 911. >>>>>>>> I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> speaking up would get you in deep trouble with the parents. >>>>>> >>>>>> Right, she knew she was in the wrong place, >>>>>> at the wrong time, doing the wrong thing. >>>>>> >>>>>> And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by the gang that >>>>>> pushed her into the room and locked the door... -- as if she had >>>>>> nothing to do with it, nothing at all. >>>>>> >>>>>> She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. >>>>> >>>>> Did she consent to be groped and undressed? No? Then she was >>>>> innocent. >>>>> >>>>>>>> She's trying to attach herself to a greater man, to sink him >>>>>>>> down to her level, at the bottom of the sea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> he?s not the superior, especially after his bad behavior last >>>>>>> week >>>>>> >>>>>> Were Kavanaugh the raging, drunk, incel you imagine, >>>>>> he would've have been locked away, long ago. >>>>> >>>>> We wish. >>>>> >>>>>> Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine, >>>>>> she would have risen to greater Heights. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, how cute -- you still believe in meritocracy. :) >>>> >>>> And you still believe in guilt by unfounded and meritless >>>> accusations. >>> >>> No. The standard of evidence in criminal trials should remain "beyond a >>> reasonable doubt". I have never claimed otherwise. >> >> There's plenty to doubt. You not only couldn't get a conviction in any >> US court, you couldn't even find a DA willing to file charges, because >> he'd get laughed right out of the courtroom. > > Are you talking about Kavanaugh? Because he's not on trial -- Imvho, that simply does not seem to be totally correct. If he is guilty, then he is complicit in participating in repeated horrific criminal activities. Calling somebody a serial gang raper, then trying to say this is not a trial, is just strange to me. A kind of setup wrt the simplistic algorithm: __________________ A insults B with outlandish accusations X. B responds as R. A says R is mean, and must be a clear indication that B is GUILTY as sin wrt X. If B is guilty of X, then according to X, it might need to go to JAIL for a very long time! How can this be "just" a job interview? __________________ Imagine X = serial gang raper! My god. > he's > undergoing a *job interview* to decide whether to give him a *promotion*. > To a position that requires the highest of ethical and moral standards. If > anything, the real disqualifier here is the repeated lying under oath, > which is easily proved and absolutely cannot be tolerated in any member of > the judicial branch. > >> It's getting late. Time to pop my nightly benzo and call it a day. >> Will you be j<NUTKICK!> > > What was that? >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--8.34pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #469989 |
You (Nadegda) replied ( to Checkmate ): > If anything, the real disqualifier here is the repeated lying under oath, > which is easily proved and absolutely cannot be tolerated in any member of > the judicial branch. Every salesman is a liar; and we're all selling it. Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Kavanaugh was a blackout drunk in high school; beer and groupies were his obsession; see: Slate.COM/news-and-politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-devils-triangle-boofing-renate-ralph-club.html All the same, I doubt Dr. Ford was kidnapped. Likely, they're _ both lying, Ford and Kavanaugh. This is another example of how "FaceBook" can ruin your life. > > It's getting late. Time to pop my nightly benzo and call it a day. > > Will you be joining me soon? > > What was that? An "Inception (2010 film)" reference ? Maybe he likes you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 21:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <ecff67c7-1c81-40f7-8a22-8979d8a3a70f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469989 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 7:08:50 PM UTC-7, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:15:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <posfhn$mhp$131@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 22:25:48 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article <pos7c6$mhp$127@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >> > @gmail.invalid says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >> melt! > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:37:42 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >> > If I was _ kidnapped, like that, I'd call 911. > >> >> >> > I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> speaking up would get you in deep trouble with the parents. > >> >> > > >> >> > Right, she knew she was in the wrong place, > >> >> > at the wrong time, doing the wrong thing. > >> >> > > >> >> > And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by the gang that > >> >> > pushed her into the room and locked the door... -- as if she had > >> >> > nothing to do with it, nothing at all. > >> >> > > >> >> > She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. > >> >> > >> >> Did she consent to be groped and undressed? No? Then she was > >> >> innocent. > >> >> > >> >> >> > She's trying to attach herself to a greater man, to sink him > >> >> >> > down to her level, at the bottom of the sea. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> he?s not the superior, especially after his bad behavior last > >> >> >> week > >> >> > > >> >> > Were Kavanaugh the raging, drunk, incel you imagine, > >> >> > he would've have been locked away, long ago. > >> >> > >> >> We wish. > >> >> > >> >> > Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine, > >> >> > she would have risen to greater Heights. > >> >> > >> >> Oh, how cute -- you still believe in meritocracy. :) > >> > > >> > And you still believe in guilt by unfounded and meritless > >> > accusations. > >> > >> No. The standard of evidence in criminal trials should remain "beyond a > >> reasonable doubt". I have never claimed otherwise. > > > > There's plenty to doubt. You not only couldn't get a conviction in any > > US court, you couldn't even find a DA willing to file charges, because > > he'd get laughed right out of the courtroom. > > Are you talking about Kavanaugh? Because he's not on trial -- he's > undergoing a *job interview* to decide whether to give him a *promotion*. > To a position that requires the highest of ethical and moral standards. If > anything, the real disqualifier here is the repeated lying under oath, > which is easily proved and absolutely cannot be tolerated in any member of > the judicial branch. > > > It's getting late. Time to pop my nightly benzo and call it a day. > > Will you be j<NUTKICK!> > > What was that? > > -- > FNVWe Nadegda > > "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with > you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM On topic discussions will not be seen once the trolls overpopulate. That, and there will always be a mental midget or more in an unmoderated group. The comedy of errors aside, we have all seen who regularly blames others when he does not get his way. Systemd is based on Linux. Even if Klaus Schadenfreude is too stupid to figure that out. You wishing for something does not make it true. Why would you want to cap all commands on Fedora to what can be done on Macs? Where did you find your scripts? - One Smart Penny https://redd.it/6sfkup Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 04:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <b67c3b59-b094-4d18-8223-cd37d9175a2c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469648 |
On Sunday, September 30, 2018 at 11:37:46 PM UTC-4, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > If I was _ kidnapped, like that, I'd call 911. > > > I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. > > > > speaking up would get you in deep trouble with the parents. How convenient of you to delete the other part of the statement, so as to avoid answering it. The complete, in context, statement was: "That’s with 50+ year retrospective. How about trying to remember how naive and non-worldly you were as a teen? Especially when speaking up would get you in deep trouble with the parents." Nevertheless, continuing: > Right, she knew she was in the wrong place, > at the wrong time, doing the wrong thing. Which was probably nothing more than to attend a party where there was the 'forbidden fruit' of underage drinking, but ultimately, we don't know just what her actual motivations were. > And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by > the gang that pushed her into the room and locked the door... > -- as if she had nothing to do with it, nothing at all. She went upstairs to go to the bathroom. Apparently, you've never drank beer /S > She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. Are you going to also try the "...and what were _you_ wearing?" defense attempt? /S > > > She's trying to attach herself to a greater man, to sink him > > > down to her level, at the bottom of the sea. > > > > he’s not the superior, especially after his bad behavior last week And once again, a convenient for you modification of the statement, so as to avoid addressing it. The complete, in context, statement was: "Given their respective professional backgrounds, he’s not the superior, especially after his bad behavior last week which IMO was professionally disqualifying. But since this is politics and divorced from impartial objectivity, he’ll probably be appointed regardless. And the Senate knows this, which is why they’re not using their traditional requirement for consensus via 60+ votes." > Were Kavanaugh the raging, drunk, incel you imagine, > he would've have been locked away, long ago. No, this statement wasn't isn't about him potentially also being a high functioning addict, as that wasn't the part that I was referring to as being disqualifying. > Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine, > she would have risen to greater Heights. Sorry, I don't recall _her_ making any claims of being a bible thumper as somehow that makes someone a "good" person. Cite please. Similarly, just what is the metric for rising to 'greater Heights', let alone just what is that supposed to mean in terms of credibility? Apparently, you're counting something other than intelligence, since she has a PhD, a level of education held by less than 1% of the US Population. Hopefully, you're using some metric other than "having connections", particularly since there apparently are some interesting questions with his personal finances ... two items that jumped out immediately for me are the $1.2M dollar home on a Judgeship salary of only $220K/yr, and the lack of an adequate explanation for the disappearance of previously reported debts. Specifically, Kavanaugh's 2016 financial disclosure report listed having between $60,000 to $200,000 in debt accrued over three credit cards and a personal loan. Based on how this reporting is done, each credit card had to have held between $15,000 to $50,000 in debt, and similarly, his retirement (Thrift Savings Plan) loan between $15,000 to $50,000. To pay these down to be under the standard $10K reporting threshold requires means finding at least $20K in liquidity that he personally just doesn't have. He tried to explain this as a lack of liquidity from his prior home having maintenance & repair costs during the decade of ownership, but the examples provided were downright mundane (such as including paint) so that doesn't really fly. He could have explained that he had previously misreported, but doing so would be an admission that he still has these debts ... he very much appears to be living above his means, which per Federal financial *and* Fed Security disclosure criteria are a red flag risk factor for both. And getting back to your "who's greater" insinuation, his net worth has been independently estimated as being only $580K despite having the equity in that big $1.2M house and his net TSP retirement account balance - - this is grossly low for someone his age and employment level standing....heck, even I have a net worth that's higher than this guy, despite a job that pays half as much as his. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 07:28 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <cc44rdd8raqferfvr13kg5868gm6r6h7od@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #469716 |
> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >> And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by >> the gang that pushed her into the room and locked the door... >> -- as if she had nothing to do with it, nothing at all. >> >> She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. Come on, Relf. You don't want to be known as an *asshole*, do you? I'll let this troll-attempt slide, as bad judgement, on your part. -- "Oh my God, it's the finest code you'll ever see." - Jeff Relf, referring to his unreadable garbage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 07:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Mr. ChrisV, my publicist. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--7.27am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #469725 |
Mr. ChrisV, my publicist, wrote:
> " Oh my God, it's the finest code you'll ever see. " - Jeff Relf,
> describing his horrendous code, "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".
The ( SpinFree ) context: ＜＜
Ezekiel:
> Ridiculous nonsense like ~ line 138.
>
> int zz ;
> #define z zz=zz;
You don't have to say, "line 138";
I can search for "#define z".
Say, for example, you want to break when i == 5; just type:
if ( i == 5 )
z // Set a break_point here.
Do you have any idea how much time it saves me ? !
Oh my God, it's the finest code you'll ever see. ＞＞
-- Groups.Google.COM/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/Zyqzyntxo-k/WI_q_un-MeoJ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 18:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <poto52$d8q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469725 |
On 2018-10-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>> And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by >>> the gang that pushed her into the room and locked the door... >>> -- as if she had nothing to do with it, nothing at all. >>> >>> She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. > > Come on, Relf. You don't want to be known as an *asshole*, do you? > I'll let this troll-attempt slide, as bad judgement, on your part. Who knows? Her complete lack of verifiable facts makes it impossible to know if she's making it up out of whole cloth or if something actually happened. Most women who have been raped or molested have the location and time seared into their memory. Ford's not being able to remember date, place (even general area), how she got there, how she got home ... nada, makes her testimony extremely dubious. It also makes it nearly impossible for Kavanaugh to refute the accusation. And I don't think that's a coincidence This is not the way it works. The accuser tells the police when, where and what happened and then the accused has the opportunity to provide proof that he wasn't there. Total Democratic sleaze intended to delay the confirmation. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 18:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <sz9b0938g0a.ahg3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #469819 |
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-10-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>> >>>> And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by >>>> the gang that pushed her into the room and locked the door... >>>> -- as if she had nothing to do with it, nothing at all. >>>> >>>> She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. >> >> Come on, Relf. You don't want to be known as an *asshole*, do you? >> I'll let this troll-attempt slide, as bad judgement, on your part. > > Who knows? Her complete lack of verifiable facts makes it impossible to know > if she's making it up out of whole cloth or if something actually happened. > Most women who have been raped or molested have the location and time seared > into their memory. Ford's not being able to remember date, place (even > general area), how she got there, how she got home ... nada, makes her > testimony extremely dubious. It also makes it nearly impossible for > Kavanaugh to refute the accusation. And I don't think that's a coincidence > This is not the way it works. The accuser tells the police when, where and > what happened and then the accused has the opportunity to provide proof that > he wasn't there. Total Democratic sleaze intended to delay the confirmation. > The whole tale is a complete lie. She's doing it for fame and money. Even without a potential book/movie deal, which you know is in the pipeline, she's already made $700K from gofundme donations. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/christine-blasey-ford-gofundme-brett-kavanaugh-allegations-senate-testimony/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 12:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <b55cef43-5839-49c6-bb2b-c236b151416d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469826 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 12:40:46 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2018-10-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>>> > >>>> And I fail to believe that she was 100% surprised by > >>>> the gang that pushed her into the room and locked the door... > >>>> -- as if she had nothing to do with it, nothing at all. > >>>> > >>>> She wasn't _ that innocent, seriously. > >> > >> Come on, Relf. You don't want to be known as an *asshole*, do you? > >> I'll let this troll-attempt slide, as bad judgement, on your part. > > > > Who knows? Her complete lack of verifiable facts makes it impossible to know > > if she's making it up out of whole cloth or if something actually happened. > > Most women who have been raped or molested have the location and time seared > > into their memory. Ford's not being able to remember date, place (even > > general area), how she got there, how she got home ... nada, makes her > > testimony extremely dubious. It also makes it nearly impossible for > > Kavanaugh to refute the accusation. And I don't think that's a coincidence > > This is not the way it works. The accuser tells the police when, where and > > what happened and then the accused has the opportunity to provide proof that > > he wasn't there. Total Democratic sleaze intended to delay the confirmation. > > > > The whole tale is a complete lie. She's doing it for fame and money. > Even without a potential book/movie deal, which you know is in the pipeline, > she's already made $700K from gofundme donations. > > https://www.cbsnews.com/news/christine-blasey-ford-gofundme-brett-kavanaugh-allegations-senate-testimony/ My band did a gig back in '95 where we followed a male dancer who left the stage about 8. We were hired because the club's owner realized that a lot of guys suddenly came into the club after whatever dancer he had that night was finished and he wanted to keep the ladies (and the guys) in the club as long as possible. A woman got up on the stage and began rubbing all over me, then she started fondling the nether region until a security guy dragged her away. I know the location of the now defunct venue, I even know someone who knows the name of the mob-affiliated owner at the time. I don't know the woman's name but I do have several witnesses to this episode (which I didn't ask for and wasn't renumerated for by the club's owner... not even an apology!). Do I have a shot at a gofundme page? A book deal, maybe? If it was 'leaked' that I liked it (she was hot) maybe I can get a short stage play...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 14:08 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <p0s4rd96pa0ihcrpc09l9b3hmcurlu2ihu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #469826 |
owl wrote: >The whole tale is a complete lie. She's doing it for fame and money. It would take quite a liar indeed, to go in front of congress and the entire world, and denounce a man that you know is innocent. -- "The hypocrisy stems from someone who does the opposite of what they've preached." - lying asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly to attack
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 19:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <potrns$84r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469838 |
On 2018-10-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > owl wrote: > >>The whole tale is a complete lie. She's doing it for fame and money. > > It would take quite a liar indeed, to go in front of congress and the > entire world, and denounce a man that you know is innocent. And yet she can't provide a place or time or any details how she got to or from this alleged "party." So maybe she is "quite the liar." How would you defend yourself against an accusation where the accuser can't provide any specifics of the alleged crime at all? Would you just slink away saying, "gee, I guess I'm guilty?" What total bullshit. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 14:20 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <6ls4rdd984s53m07n6jink3fjv52ofkct9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #469841 |
RonB wrote: >And yet she can't provide a place or time or any details how she got to or >from this alleged "party." Neither can I, to just about any party that ever I went to, way back then. Indeed, after being assaulted, all other details of the evening may well be overwhelmed as trivial, in comparison. Jeezes. The things that some people think is "evidence".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 19:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <pottha$84r$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469845 |
On 2018-10-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > RonB wrote: > >>And yet she can't provide a place or time or any details how she got to or >>from this alleged "party." > > Neither can I, to just about any party that ever I went to, way back > then. Except no one attempted to rape you at one of these parties, right? She was 15, how did she get there? What general area in what town did this happen? Who was she with? Who picked her up? Did she ride a bicycle? Did she walk? Was her house near the house where this supposedly happened? She can't remember ANY of this? BULLSHIT. > Indeed, after being assaulted, all other details of the evening may > well be overwhelmed as trivial, in comparison. Except that's NOT the case with women who REALLY are sexually assaulted. They remember these details. > Jeezes. The things that some people think is "evidence". You're want Kavanaugh's life to be destroyed when there is complete and total lack of verifiable evidence? ZERO. NADA. NOTHING. Ford CLAIMS it happened. Her life-long friend refutes her testimony. So much for the "facts" of the case. Geeze, indeed. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 14:50 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <ghu4rdhddi92v7ov9abbjjco1uco7asivd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #469855 |
RonB wrote: >Except no one attempted to rape you at one of these parties, right? >(snipped, unread) Just *inisting* that all the other details would be clear, because someone tried to rape her, that night. One could easily argue the opposite. Sheesh!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 19:59 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <potubf$84r$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469857 |
On 2018-10-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > RonB wrote: > >>Except no one attempted to rape you at one of these parties, right? >>(snipped, unread) > > Just *inisting* that all the other details would be clear, because > someone tried to rape her, that night. > > One could easily argue the opposite. > > Sheesh! Again, this is inconsistent with the testimony of other women who have been raped or assaulted. They DO remember these details YEARS after the fact. Sheesh! -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 16:10 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... |
| Message-ID | <qicv6jyg6s0t$.u6wo9z7q7ily.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #469866 |
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:59:43 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > On 2018-10-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> RonB wrote: >> >>>Except no one attempted to rape you at one of these parties, right? >>>(snipped, unread) >> >> Just *inisting* that all the other details would be clear, because >> someone tried to rape her, that night. >> >> One could easily argue the opposite. >> >> Sheesh! > > Again, this is inconsistent with the testimony of other women who have been > raped or assaulted. They DO remember these details YEARS after the fact. > > Sheesh! When you couple Ford's activities related to Me Too, the Democratic party, her family connections and then her testimony the entire thing stinks to high heaven. My personal believe is something very serious did happen to her at some point in her life, but it wasn't Brett Kavanaugh who was responsible. The woman is obviously mentally ill and a pathological liar out to "heal herself" with closure of whatever happened to her. I can't believe the libtards are actually focusing on an emotional Kavenaugh, his college beer drinking games and so forth and completely ignoring Ford's faults because it's PC to leave the "victim" alone. Kavanaugh might not have been a saint, but it's really difficult to earn degrees like he did, reach the level of career that he has and be some kind of a massive drunk. Not possible. And then add the apparent facts that he has many, many, females supporting him throughout that career saying he has always been a gentleman. It's just not possible for someone to turn it off and on. It doesn't work like that. I'm waiting for the NY Times to find a picture of Brett at college partying with a lamp shade on his head and he's dancing on a table with a brewski in hand. Big deal. Yet these same people ignore so many of their own who are huge slimes. Clinton, both of them, come to mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 46 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 46 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web