Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #468142 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-22 09:36 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 907 — 42 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
somebody running Snit over in a rental pickup truck from Lowes would be viewed as solid community service Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 08:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 10:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 15:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 07:47 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:24 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 05:55 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:00 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 05:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
All educated people agree that Snit is the very definition of insanity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 05:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:10 -0500
Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:21 +0000
Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 06:42 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 10:05 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:00 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:10 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:48 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 05:39 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:50 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
"Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-30 07:13 -0700
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-30 20:14 -0700
Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:58 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:54 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700
Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 04:14 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:28 -0500
Mr. ChrisV, my publicist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 07:27 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:13 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:06 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:08 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:15 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:20 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:45 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:50 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:59 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:10 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:22 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:05 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 22:58 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:34 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 06:02 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:42 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:02 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:00 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:17 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:23 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:52 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:04 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:28 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 13:54 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:55 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:12 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:45 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 18:12 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:26 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 05:31 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:13 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:23 -0500
Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 21:27 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-10-02 07:59 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 01:19 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:55 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 12:07 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:35 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:38 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:58 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:07 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:15 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:44 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 07:20 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:15 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:51 -0400
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 22:57 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:28 -0500
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:41 +0000
Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:57 -0700
Re: Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 07:42 -0700
Re: Everyone on the left is jealous, seething with intent. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 07:52 -0700
Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:36 -0700
I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:43 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:34 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 01:30 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:45 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 08:50 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 14:15 +0000
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 08:23 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:22 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:28 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:18 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:40 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 14:22 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:39 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 21:58 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:05 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:31 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 20:55 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:44 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 13:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:39 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:23 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:47 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:46 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 16:05 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:41 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:56 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-02 06:30 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 06:48 -0700
Depending on how you define the word "is"... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 06:58 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 08:49 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 09:54 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 13:47 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:53 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:07 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:10 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:29 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:12 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:43 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:04 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 13:40 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-01 17:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 21:43 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 10:03 -0500
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 06:26 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 00:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:13 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 02:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 06:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 08:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:28 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 16:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 01:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 04:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 01:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 17:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 02:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 04:13 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 03:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:23 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 20:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 07:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 04:45 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:27 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
Re: The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:34 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 07:21 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 18:48 -0700
Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 21:44 -0700
Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:03 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:42 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:16 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:25 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 04:10 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:14 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:22 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:27 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
Re: Trump is a salesman. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:01 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 01:49 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 08:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 08:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 05:23 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:24 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:48 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:42 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:21 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:36 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:46 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 00:17 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 21:22 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
"IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:19 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 03:38 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 10:54 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:37 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:55 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:51 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
Democratic Socialists are Tards ... Just thought that the COLA Fruits might want to know Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:59 -0700
Re: Democratic Socialists are Tards ... Just thought that the COLA Fruits might want to know Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:17 -0700
Second verse, same as the first ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:26 -0700
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 09:50 -0400
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:38 +0000
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 08:02 -0700
Second verse, same as the first ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 09:20 -0700
Re: Second verse, same as the first ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 09:36 -0700
Page 35 of 46 — ← Prev page 1 … 33 34 [35] 36 37 … 46 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 04:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. |
| Message-ID | <5078cf1a-03b4-4580-b26d-73519ef38ee2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469718 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 4:27:14 AM UTC-7, Skeeter wrote: > In article <posfmj$mhp$132@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... > > > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:31:29 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > > Checkmate! In article <pos7dn$mhp$128@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > > >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:48:09 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > >> > > >> >> > I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh ever did what he's > > >> >> > accused of. > > >> >> > > >> >> Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: > > >> >> wealthy, > > >> >> privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been > > >> >> raised to take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to > > >> >> several gang rapes. > > >> > > > >> > Classic strawman argument. > > >> > Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long > > >> > ago. > > >> > > >> Nonsense. Guys like him get away with rape *all the time*. Fixing this > > >> is why #MeToo exists. > > > > > > There are at least half a dozen Democrats who've done far worse, much > > > more currently, and with more evidence. Where's the outpouring of moral > > > outrage from your fellow Libtards concerning any of them? You wanna > > > talk about rapists? How about that Clinton dude? Will you have an > > > answer for me on this, or will you let the crickets do the talking? No > > > snipping allowed... > > > > Half a dozen Democrats vs. most, if not *all*, Rapepublicans. And only the > > latter openly support and defend rapists and work ceaselessly to > > *officially*, in their capacity as lawmakers, undermine the ability of > > rape to be prosecuted. > > > > That being said, the sleazier Democrats should be purged from the party, > > from Bill Clinton to Al Franken and any others who get caught. Or perhaps > > we should give up on the Dems and root for someone else, maybe the SDA ... > > kensi seems to be leaning that way these days. > > You didn't capitalize kensis name, you think you're better than her? No-one gets it, I don't get it. Enjoy the view in the packed latrine of my trash can. Steve 'The Shill' Petruzzellis would have to be afflicted with dementia to be unsure of if he "never had" worked with Bash shell. When Steve 'The Shill' Petruzzellis can't be consistent with his story and makes use of pretend, self-esteem protecting bunk later, it's completely apparent what his error is. -- E-commerce Simplified https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8 http://www.5z8.info/myspace-of-sex_q7q7zl_instant-purchase Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. |
| Message-ID | <potgv9$p8u$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #469718 |
On 10/1/2018 6:27 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <posfmj$mhp$132@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:31:29 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pos7dn$mhp$128@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:48:09 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh ever did what he's >>>>>>> accused of. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: >>>>>> wealthy, >>>>>> privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been >>>>>> raised to take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to >>>>>> several gang rapes. >>>>> >>>>> Classic strawman argument. >>>>> Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long >>>>> ago. >>>> >>>> Nonsense. Guys like him get away with rape *all the time*. Fixing this >>>> is why #MeToo exists. >>> >>> There are at least half a dozen Democrats who've done far worse, much >>> more currently, and with more evidence. Where's the outpouring of moral >>> outrage from your fellow Libtards concerning any of them? You wanna >>> talk about rapists? How about that Clinton dude? Will you have an >>> answer for me on this, or will you let the crickets do the talking? No >>> snipping allowed... >> >> Half a dozen Democrats vs. most, if not *all*, Rapepublicans. And only the >> latter openly support and defend rapists and work ceaselessly to >> *officially*, in their capacity as lawmakers, undermine the ability of >> rape to be prosecuted. >> >> That being said, the sleazier Democrats should be purged from the party, >> from Bill Clinton to Al Franken and any others who get caught. Or perhaps >> we should give up on the Dems and root for someone else, maybe the SDA ... >> kensi seems to be leaning that way these days. > > You didn't capitalize kensis name, you think you're better than her? > little kensi pupa not grown up enough for capitalist, and 'she' not ready for reproduction either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 09:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. |
| Message-ID | <c2417ba3-f97c-485d-bc97-d47c5b564b56@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469770 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 9:11:25 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > On 10/1/2018 6:27 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <posfmj$mhp$132@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:31:29 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >>> Checkmate! In article <pos7dn$mhp$128@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >>> @gmail.invalid says... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:48:09 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>>> I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh ever did what he's > >>>>>>> accused of. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: > >>>>>> wealthy, > >>>>>> privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been > >>>>>> raised to take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to > >>>>>> several gang rapes. > >>>>> > >>>>> Classic strawman argument. > >>>>> Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long > >>>>> ago. > >>>> > >>>> Nonsense. Guys like him get away with rape *all the time*. Fixing this > >>>> is why #MeToo exists. > >>> > >>> There are at least half a dozen Democrats who've done far worse, much > >>> more currently, and with more evidence. Where's the outpouring of moral > >>> outrage from your fellow Libtards concerning any of them? You wanna > >>> talk about rapists? How about that Clinton dude? Will you have an > >>> answer for me on this, or will you let the crickets do the talking? No > >>> snipping allowed... > >> > >> Half a dozen Democrats vs. most, if not *all*, Rapepublicans. And only the > >> latter openly support and defend rapists and work ceaselessly to > >> *officially*, in their capacity as lawmakers, undermine the ability of > >> rape to be prosecuted. > >> > >> That being said, the sleazier Democrats should be purged from the party, > >> from Bill Clinton to Al Franken and any others who get caught. Or perhaps > >> we should give up on the Dems and root for someone else, maybe the SDA ... > >> kensi seems to be leaning that way these days. > > > > You didn't capitalize kensis name, you think you're better than her? > > > > little kensi pupa not grown up enough for capitalist, > and 'she' not ready for reproduction either. By getting an education from 'lawyers' like that you get concepts like 'pride'. Carried to its (ir)rational progression, the media position that it's 'discrimination' for a heterosexual dude to not wish to marry a child is instituted. Was that meant to be to me? Marketing is a wonderful thing and consumer cluelessness is even better. Linux offers the least of everything to the average user. - Get Rich Slow http://tinyurl.com/kmqe66h http://www.macadvocacy.pw/2005/Nov/09/236626.html http://www.5z8.info/hackwebcam_e9z2tw_friendster-of-sex Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. |
| Message-ID | <31l4rd9fud43vf4o28rra0s8db9tdh2s4d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #469770 |
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 11:11:25 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 10/1/2018, Skeeter wrote: <...> >> You didn't capitalize kensis name, you think you're better than her? >> >little kensi pupa not grown up enough for capitalist, >and 'she' not ready for reproduction either. Kensi IS ready for reproduction. Paul just acquired a new pair of sock knitting needles. LOL! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ÂŪ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700 |
| Subject | The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--6.06am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #469671 |
Nadegda replied: > perhaps we should give up on the Dems and root for someone else, > maybe the SDA ... kensi seems to be leaning that way these days. The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 06:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? |
| Message-ID | <c190c9fc-2e50-4cec-b6fa-bfebcd58d2d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469739 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 6:06:19 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Nadegda replied: > > perhaps we should give up on the Dems and root for someone else, > > maybe the SDA ... kensi seems to be leaning that way these days. > > The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? LOL! Give it up, Jonas Eklundh... even you have blocked that jackass. Given what Klaus Schadenfreude is not a soul could condemn you for wanting to be rid of his laughable style of crap. And in reply you have nothing but an attempt to start a war. Klaus Schadenfreude loves that Jonas Eklundh is on the other end. Imagine if Klaus Schadenfreude walked up to a wall and delivered the punch line. It wouldn't be worth it. I am working on a program which will blow what Linux has away. Ha, ha, ha! Jonas Eklundh conned Klaus Schadenfreude a bit, big fucking deal. Klaus Schadenfreude is being a whiny fuckhead about it? Klaus Schadenfreude doesn't have any idea what he is blubbering about. -- This broke the Internet! http://tinyurl.com/kmqe66h Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361bb21450ccb78989d0e@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #469653 |
In article <pos7dn$mhp$128@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:48:09 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > >> > I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh ever did what he's > >> > accused of. > >> > >> Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: wealthy, > >> privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been raised > >> to take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to several gang > >> rapes. > > > > Classic strawman argument. > > Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long > > ago. > > Nonsense. Guys like him get away with rape *all the time*. Fixing this is > why #MeToo exists. Metoo is a joke and a bunch of well led puppets.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--5.14am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #469653 |
Nadegda: > Guys like Kavanaugh get away with rape *all the time*. > Fixing this is why #MeToo exists. The FBI is investigating him for the seventh time, now. Yet, somehow, you are the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. |
| Message-ID | <s7ydnTSuycOOuy_GnZ2dnUU7-dHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #469724 |
On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:14:42 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD; "Jeff-Relf.Me @." determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--5.14am.Seattle.2018>: >Nadegda: >>Guys like Kavanaugh get away with rape *all the time*. Fixing this is >>why #MeToo exists. > >The FBI is investigating him for the seventh time, now. Yet, somehow, >you are the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. they can't prove things that happened in the past. you can only ever prove if things happened in the future, and they haven't happened yet. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 07:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. |
| Message-ID | <e477f651-9523-41e5-be33-625fffd63ef3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469750 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 6:50:18 AM UTC-7, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:14:42 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD; > "Jeff-Relf.Me @." determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--5.14am.Seattle.2018>: > > >Nadegda: > >>Guys like Kavanaugh get away with rape *all the time*. Fixing this is > >>why #MeToo exists. > > > >The FBI is investigating him for the seventh time, now. Yet, somehow, > >you are the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. > > they can't prove things that happened in the past. you can only ever prove if things happened in the future, and they haven't happened yet. > > -- > THIS SPACE FOR RENT > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA > > "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this > seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, > and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an > end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell > everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized > country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become > like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) > > "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously > unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic > terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie > terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what > they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by > keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) > > - > > "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor > > - > > "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode > > - > > "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> > > - > > Golden Killfile, June 2005 > KOTM, November 2006 > Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 > Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 > Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 > Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 > Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 > Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 > Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 > Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 > Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 > AUK Mascot, September 2007 > Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <fmre6tF8stoU3@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >> Steve Carroll (Snit): >> For most I would say the comment is worth looking into. Of course, >> given that it's chrisv I would ignore that doubt and go straight >> to 'lie' because that's most of what chrisv does. Meaning no >> evidence is required to deem it dishonest. So what's chrisv's >> system for the flooding deluge? AppleScript? That is the only tool >> he knows, isn't it? He must be abusing it to create these goofy >> "obsession" garbage posts. My hypothesis, chrisv took Steven >> Petruzzellis's code that he stole and pretended was his... he's >> feeding it Steven Petruzzellis's posts, grabbing offensive >> paragraphs, then altering those using automated reinforcement >> learning and then he hand posts them because his insomnia enables >> him to do that practically endlessly. > >> The content is a bunch of randomized bullshit. That points to one >> person. Real discussion will be destroyed once the trolls >> overpopulate. That, and there will always be a butthurt insomniac >> or two in an open news group (hint: chrisv). The specifics of the >> bullshit aside, we have all seen who routinely gets angry when he >> does not get a response. > >> -- >> Best CMS Solution of 2017! >> https://www.facebook.com/JonasEklundh >> https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 >> https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs >> Jonas Eklundh Communication > > Why do you link to Sandman's FB page? And you do so in the same post > you point to a link to his trolling. > Why? Did he leave COLA because of you? So cute, Snit thinks he can make me leave COLA :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbD6/mAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRjLYH+we67Zx/z0UtJtVFvIZJ/Kki 0ljOcqQgkGmhkW63ifRT6J3Lzk7JHiUs9I5ZLD09MGvk8ZIU8ZNhS7QKfGxrLJA2 k1JrXzrB+Ko6u56WOqeRMM3R17GsYDIxqwzWfzLwceGxs78Ikpjnd1J4pW1nq7yK hP/oVHenewp54mZIhb8e0eZWZasVLiKwSsO22Rr1NcJku4UrD25yNtrth+SH1ZRk 0U7X0KtHwKDE6MqlnZxexxKg+6sbdKwrn1C2oPSFc+7AtnaUfauPP0+dyrgD1rG3 +P3BkDk0eZsRgmC8kqEzCiveEk9zarSrJqLGjn3WOYiZa+aqzN9UqUCnblaFe+o= =kqoW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- One Smart Penny! https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. |
| Message-ID | <pou2ej$ln5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469750 |
On 10/1/2018 6:50 AM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:14:42 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD; > "Jeff-Relf.Me @." determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--5.14am.Seattle.2018>: > >> Nadegda: >>> Guys like Kavanaugh get away with rape *all the time*. Fixing this is >>> why #MeToo exists. >> >> The FBI is investigating him for the seventh time, now. Yet, somehow, >> you are the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. > > they can't prove things that happened in the past. DNA? > you can only ever prove if things happened in the future, and they haven't happened yet. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 15:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. |
| Message-ID | <15760bf1-c74f-4f3e-846a-b426c5472ba1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469891 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 2:09:41 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 10/1/2018 6:50 AM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder > Emeritus ðķįŽ wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:14:42 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD; > > "Jeff-Relf.Me @." determined that the following was of great > > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > > <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--5.14am.Seattle.2018>: > > > >> Nadegda: > >>> Guys like Kavanaugh get away with rape *all the time*. Fixing this is > >>> why #MeToo exists. > >> > >> The FBI is investigating him for the seventh time, now. Yet, somehow, > >> you are the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. > > > > they can't prove things that happened in the past. > > DNA? > > > > > you can only ever prove if things happened in the future, and they haven't happened yet. > > All that matters is that Klaus Schadenfreude gets to dish out his spam message and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Steven Carroll is a real person on the other end of the phone is his motivation. Why do you keep repeating yourself? And in reply you have nothing but a crack to start more flooding. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! -- This broke the Internet!! https://www.facebook.com/jenny.eklund https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/BVpdH5KOc6s Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361b64fb3c7e7320994cfe@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #469632 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <porvqu$mhp$120@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:35:28 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <porabg$mhp$109@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:51:16 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article > >> > <9v32rd55c7mgbqhs6pga4rhpueiv25hfho@4ax.com>, > >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:57:49 -0400, mixed nuts > >> >> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Bimbo girls just don't understand how deeply and uncontrollably > >> >> >passionate drunk men can be when they're a-rapin' chicks just for > >> >> >good times and great camaraderie like with basketball and football > >> >> >and war fighting for their flag and country and The President. > >> >> > >> >> Young girls who present themselves as rape fodder to young boys and > >> >> end up being raped have nobody but themselves to blame. > >> >> > >> >> Now, it's a different story entirely if the *boy* is not underage. > >> >> > >> >> Why the double-standard, anyhow? Some how a 15-year-old girl isn't > >> >> responsible for the consequences of her actions but a 15-year-old > >> >> boy IS? > >> >> > >> >> Go figure. > >> > > >> > The pussy trumps the penis in our legal system. > >> > >> I wish. > >> > >> No, but responsibility for an action lies with the person who took the > >> action. If a boy tries to force himself on a girl, that's the boy's > >> action and his responsibility. Simple, no? > > > > Of course. Except that I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh ever > > did what he's accused of. > > Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: wealthy, > privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been raised to > take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to several gang rapes. Please feel free to be providing that "proof" for me, you incorrigible Ko0kfart... -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361bb4e414f90f5b989d16@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #469677 |
In article <MPG.361b64fb3c7e7320994cfe@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 @gmail.com says... > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <porvqu$mhp$120@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:35:28 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > > Checkmate! In article <porabg$mhp$109@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > > >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:51:16 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > >> > > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > > >> > by Checkmate! In article > > >> > <9v32rd55c7mgbqhs6pga4rhpueiv25hfho@4ax.com>, > > >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:57:49 -0400, mixed nuts > > >> >> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >Bimbo girls just don't understand how deeply and uncontrollably > > >> >> >passionate drunk men can be when they're a-rapin' chicks just for > > >> >> >good times and great camaraderie like with basketball and football > > >> >> >and war fighting for their flag and country and The President. > > >> >> > > >> >> Young girls who present themselves as rape fodder to young boys and > > >> >> end up being raped have nobody but themselves to blame. > > >> >> > > >> >> Now, it's a different story entirely if the *boy* is not underage. > > >> >> > > >> >> Why the double-standard, anyhow? Some how a 15-year-old girl isn't > > >> >> responsible for the consequences of her actions but a 15-year-old > > >> >> boy IS? > > >> >> > > >> >> Go figure. > > >> > > > >> > The pussy trumps the penis in our legal system. > > >> > > >> I wish. > > >> > > >> No, but responsibility for an action lies with the person who took the > > >> action. If a boy tries to force himself on a girl, that's the boy's > > >> action and his responsibility. Simple, no? > > > > > > Of course. Except that I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh ever > > > did what he's accused of. > > > > Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: wealthy, > > privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been raised to > > take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to several gang rapes. > > Please feel free to be providing that "proof" for me, you incorrigible > Ko0kfart... Soon as it turns off CNN it may be able to say something coherent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 05:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <c45bd392-43d5-4701-bbf9-2bbce21efe7d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #469720 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 4:37:28 AM UTC-7, Skeeter wrote: > In article <MPG.361b64fb3c7e7320994cfe@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 > @gmail.com says... > > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <porvqu$mhp$120@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > > > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:35:28 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > > > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > > > Checkmate! In article <porabg$mhp$109@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > > > >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:51:16 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > > > >> > by Checkmate! In article > > > >> > <9v32rd55c7mgbqhs6pga4rhpueiv25hfho@4ax.com>, > > > >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:57:49 -0400, mixed nuts > > > >> >> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> >Bimbo girls just don't understand how deeply and uncontrollably > > > >> >> >passionate drunk men can be when they're a-rapin' chicks just for > > > >> >> >good times and great camaraderie like with basketball and football > > > >> >> >and war fighting for their flag and country and The President. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Young girls who present themselves as rape fodder to young boys and > > > >> >> end up being raped have nobody but themselves to blame. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Now, it's a different story entirely if the *boy* is not underage. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Why the double-standard, anyhow? Some how a 15-year-old girl isn't > > > >> >> responsible for the consequences of her actions but a 15-year-old > > > >> >> boy IS? > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Go figure. > > > >> > > > > >> > The pussy trumps the penis in our legal system. > > > >> > > > >> I wish. > > > >> > > > >> No, but responsibility for an action lies with the person who took the > > > >> action. If a boy tries to force himself on a girl, that's the boy's > > > >> action and his responsibility. Simple, no? > > > > > > > > Of course. Except that I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh ever > > > > did what he's accused of. > > > > > > Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: wealthy, > > > privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been raised to > > > take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to several gang rapes. > > > > Please feel free to be providing that "proof" for me, you incorrigible > > Ko0kfart... > > Soon as it turns off CNN it may be able to say something coherent. Yup. Clearly this is what we have to put up with. Psychopaths who have no reason for being here other than to troll. Why the added requirement to time a script via an automated phone system in a desktop system? No matter, he didn't suggest this as part of his unsurprisingly always growing 'requirements'. Don't look now, but I think vallor has a serious brocrush on Michael Glasser Snit. Gee, imagine vallor trying to pin his hot air on Michael Glasser Snit and me, no one has ever seen that before (â_â). You've proven very little. What vallor really means: vallor's incredible "troubleshooting expertise" side tracked him from an add-on he wants that everyone else is already using with MATE. The only thing malfunctioning here is vallor. It was vallor who forged me (and others) and admitted to having done so. Pro tip: You will not go into a shindig, chug all the moonshine, screw all the goats, nab the bibles, and toss your cookies in the lap of Michael Glasser Snit without being observed. -- Get Rich Slow https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OffkiSAsYo8 http://www.5z8.info/stalin-will-rise-again_j3h5uj_nakedgrandmas.jpg http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <EwpsD.31104$X82.6911@fx22.iad> |
| In reply to | #469720 |
On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:37:25 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <MPG.361b64fb3c7e7320994cfe@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 > @gmail.com says... >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <porvqu$mhp$120@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> > melt! >> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:35:28 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> > >> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> > > posts by Checkmate! In article <porabg$mhp$109@dont-email.me>, >> > > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> > >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:51:16 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> > >> > posts by Checkmate! In article >> > >> > <9v32rd55c7mgbqhs6pga4rhpueiv25hfho@4ax.com>, >> > >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:57:49 -0400, mixed nuts >> > >> >> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >Bimbo girls just don't understand how deeply and >> > >> >> >uncontrollably passionate drunk men can be when they're >> > >> >> >a-rapin' chicks just for good times and great camaraderie like >> > >> >> >with basketball and football and war fighting for their flag >> > >> >> >and country and The President. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Young girls who present themselves as rape fodder to young boys >> > >> >> and end up being raped have nobody but themselves to blame. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Now, it's a different story entirely if the *boy* is not >> > >> >> underage. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Why the double-standard, anyhow? Some how a 15-year-old girl >> > >> >> isn't responsible for the consequences of her actions but a >> > >> >> 15-year-old boy IS? >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Go figure. >> > >> > >> > >> > The pussy trumps the penis in our legal system. >> > >> >> > >> I wish. >> > >> >> > >> No, but responsibility for an action lies with the person who took >> > >> the action. If a boy tries to force himself on a girl, that's the >> > >> boy's action and his responsibility. Simple, no? >> > > >> > > Of course. Except that I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh >> > > ever did what he's accused of. >> > >> > Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: wealthy, >> > privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been raised >> > to take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to several gang >> > rapes. >> >> Please feel free to be providing that "proof" for me, you incorrigible >> Ko0kfart... > > Soon as it turns off CNN it may be able to say something coherent. Speaking of CNN, it turns out that the Food Network is regularly beating "America's Most Trusted News Network" in the ratings. You'd think having a collection of lying homosexuals anchoring every hour would appeal to more people. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Christian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <pou1o7$hv1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469677 |
On 9/30/2018 11:56 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <porvqu$mhp$120@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:35:28 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <porabg$mhp$109@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:51:16 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article >>>>> <9v32rd55c7mgbqhs6pga4rhpueiv25hfho@4ax.com>, >>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:57:49 -0400, mixed nuts >>>>>> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Bimbo girls just don't understand how deeply and uncontrollably >>>>>>> passionate drunk men can be when they're a-rapin' chicks just for >>>>>>> good times and great camaraderie like with basketball and football >>>>>>> and war fighting for their flag and country and The President. >>>>>> >>>>>> Young girls who present themselves as rape fodder to young boys and >>>>>> end up being raped have nobody but themselves to blame. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now, it's a different story entirely if the *boy* is not underage. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why the double-standard, anyhow? Some how a 15-year-old girl isn't >>>>>> responsible for the consequences of her actions but a 15-year-old >>>>>> boy IS? >>>>>> >>>>>> Go figure. >>>>> >>>>> The pussy trumps the penis in our legal system. >>>> >>>> I wish. >>>> >>>> No, but responsibility for an action lies with the person who took the >>>> action. If a boy tries to force himself on a girl, that's the boy's >>>> action and his responsibility. Simple, no? >>> >>> Of course. Except that I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh ever >>> did what he's accused of. >> >> Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: wealthy, >> privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been raised to >> take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to several gang rapes. > > Please feel free to be providing that "proof" for me, you incorrigible > Ko0kfart... > I need to see a lot more real evidence that can really build on a solid proof. Tell me how Kavanaugh is some sort of "ring leader" for a club filled with rapists, that would get together and just sexually assault the shi% out of every victim "it" could successfully target...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <pouag1$4sa$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #469886 |
On 10/1/2018 4:57 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 9/30/2018 11:56 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <porvqu$mhp$120@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >>> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:35:28 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <porabg$mhp$109@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:51:16 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by Checkmate! In article >>>>>> <9v32rd55c7mgbqhs6pga4rhpueiv25hfho@4ax.com>, >>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:57:49 -0400, mixed nuts >>>>>>> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bimbo girls just don't understand how deeply and uncontrollably >>>>>>>> passionate drunk men can be when they're a-rapin' chicks just for >>>>>>>> good times and great camaraderie like with basketball and football >>>>>>>> and war fighting for their flag and country and The President. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Young girls who present themselves as rape fodder to young boys and >>>>>>> end up being raped have nobody but themselves to blame. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now, it's a different story entirely if the *boy* is not underage. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why the double-standard, anyhow? Some how a 15-year-old girl isn't >>>>>>> responsible for the consequences of her actions but a 15-year-old >>>>>>> boy IS? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Go figure. >>>>>> >>>>>> The pussy trumps the penis in our legal system. >>>>> >>>>> I wish. >>>>> >>>>> No, but responsibility for an action lies with the person who took the >>>>> action. If a boy tries to force himself on a girl, that's the boy's >>>>> action and his responsibility. Simple, no? >>>> >>>> Of course. Except that I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh >>>> ever >>>> did what he's accused of. >>> >>> Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: wealthy, >>> privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been raised to >>> take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to several gang rapes. >> >> Please feel free to be providing that "proof" for me, you incorrigible >> Ko0kfart... >> > > I need to see a lot more real evidence that can really build on a solid > proof. Tell me how Kavanaugh is some sort of "ring leader" for a club > filled with rapists, that would get together and just sexually assault > the shi% out of every victim "it" could successfully target... "Toxic Maculinity" is the proof. Just as it proves YOU are a rapist as well. You just haven't been investigated yet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <poub3p$88a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469948 |
On 10/1/2018 4:27 PM, benj wrote: > On 10/1/2018 4:57 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 9/30/2018 11:56 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <porvqu$mhp$120@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:35:28 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>> posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <porabg$mhp$109@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:51:16 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>>> by Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <9v32rd55c7mgbqhs6pga4rhpueiv25hfho@4ax.com>, >>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:57:49 -0400, mixed nuts >>>>>>>> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bimbo girls just don't understand how deeply and uncontrollably >>>>>>>>> passionate drunk men can be when they're a-rapin' chicks just for >>>>>>>>> good times and great camaraderie like with basketball and football >>>>>>>>> and war fighting for their flag and country and The President. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Young girls who present themselves as rape fodder to young boys and >>>>>>>> end up being raped have nobody but themselves to blame. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now, it's a different story entirely if the *boy* is not underage. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why the double-standard, anyhow? Some how a 15-year-old girl isn't >>>>>>>> responsible for the consequences of her actions but a 15-year-old >>>>>>>> boy IS? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Go figure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The pussy trumps the penis in our legal system. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wish. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, but responsibility for an action lies with the person who took >>>>>> the >>>>>> action. If a boy tries to force himself on a girl, that's the boy's >>>>>> action and his responsibility. Simple, no? >>>>> >>>>> Of course. Except that I don't believe for a minute that Kavanaugh >>>>> ever >>>>> did what he's accused of. >>>> >>>> Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: wealthy, >>>> privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been >>>> raised to >>>> take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to several gang rapes. >>> >>> Please feel free to be providing that "proof" for me, you incorrigible >>> Ko0kfart... >>> >> >> I need to see a lot more real evidence that can really build on a >> solid proof. Tell me how Kavanaugh is some sort of "ring leader" for a >> club filled with rapists, that would get together and just sexually >> assault the shi% out of every victim "it" could successfully target... > > "Toxic Maculinity" is the proof. Just as it proves YOU are a rapist as > well. You just haven't been investigated yet. Control: Destroy the natural relationship between men and woman. Use artificial means for reproduction. Humm: https://youtu.be/TrvMzk1ozE4 Yikes!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <poub69$88a$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #469957 |
On 10/1/2018 4:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 10/1/2018 4:27 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 10/1/2018 4:57 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 9/30/2018 11:56 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>> Checkmate! In article <porvqu$mhp$120@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:35:28 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>> posts by
>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <porabg$mhp$109@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:51:16 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>>> posts
>>>>>>>> by Checkmate! In article
>>>>>>>> <9v32rd55c7mgbqhs6pga4rhpueiv25hfho@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:57:49 -0400, mixed nuts
>>>>>>>>> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bimbo girls just don't understand how deeply and uncontrollably
>>>>>>>>>> passionate drunk men can be when they're a-rapin' chicks just for
>>>>>>>>>> good times and great camaraderie like with basketball and
>>>>>>>>>> football
>>>>>>>>>> and war fighting for their flag and country and The President.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Young girls who present themselves as rape fodder to young boys
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> end up being raped have nobody but themselves to blame.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now, it's a different story entirely if the *boy* is not underage.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why the double-standard, anyhow? Some how a 15-year-old girl
>>>>>>>>> isn't
>>>>>>>>> responsible for the consequences of her actions but a 15-year-old
>>>>>>>>> boy IS?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Go figure.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The pussy trumps the penis in our legal system.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wish.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, but responsibility for an action lies with the person who
>>>>>>> took the
>>>>>>> action. If a boy tries to force himself on a girl, that's the boy's
>>>>>>> action and his responsibility. Simple, no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course. Except that I don't believe for a minute that
>>>>>> Kavanaugh ever
>>>>>> did what he's accused of.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not? He's the spitting image of the acquaintance-rapist: wealthy,
>>>>> privileged, preppy/yuppy frat boy type, aggressive, never been
>>>>> raised to
>>>>> take "no" for an answer...and a proven accessory to several gang
>>>>> rapes.
>>>>
>>>> Please feel free to be providing that "proof" for me, you incorrigible
>>>> Ko0kfart...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I need to see a lot more real evidence that can really build on a
>>> solid proof. Tell me how Kavanaugh is some sort of "ring leader" for
>>> a club filled with rapists, that would get together and just sexually
>>> assault the shi% out of every victim "it" could successfully target...
>>
>> "Toxic Maculinity" is the proof. Just as it proves YOU are a rapist as
>> well. You just haven't been investigated yet.
>
> Control:
>
> Destroy the natural relationship between men and woman.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Wow. I need to correct this to man and woman.
Do not want to be accused of gang rape. Jesus.
>
> Use artificial means for reproduction.
>
> Humm:
>
> https://youtu.be/TrvMzk1ozE4
>
> Yikes!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 35 of 46 — ← Prev page 1 … 33 34 [35] 36 37 … 46 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web