Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #331475 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-07 14:41 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-08 14:37 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 166 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 14:41 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-07 09:59 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 10:26 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 18:33 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 13:35 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 19:07 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 14:17 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 19:32 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 19:33 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-07 13:49 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 16:56 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 16:56 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 22:18 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 22:21 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 22:31 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 17:36 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 23:17 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 19:58 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 22:28 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 07:20 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 08:13 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 17:36 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 17:58 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 13:05 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 11:33 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-08 10:11 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 17:31 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 17:33 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 17:51 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 12:56 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 18:18 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 18:19 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 13:41 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 19:00 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 14:54 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 12:35 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 17:42 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 12:53 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-08 12:48 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 18:31 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 19:21 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 19:34 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 15:02 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 11:50 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-08 18:40 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 18:47 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-10 08:41 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-10 03:16 -0800
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-10 11:47 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:04 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 17:32 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 22:34 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 07:12 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 11:39 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 10:49 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-11-16 13:08 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-16 09:24 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-16 19:09 +0100
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-16 12:27 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 17:25 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 22:41 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 17:45 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 01:15 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 22:27 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-07 13:48 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 21:22 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 17:00 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 22:08 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 17:12 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 22:34 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 02:02 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-07 18:27 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-07 20:54 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 21:35 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-07 18:29 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 01:52 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-08 12:31 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 20:00 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 15:04 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 20:22 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 15:30 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 11:53 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-08 19:37 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 11:53 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-08 09:53 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-08 16:03 +0100
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 10:07 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 15:14 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-08 11:43 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-08 12:33 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 07:30 -0600
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 08:34 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 09:28 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 08:17 -0600
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-09 06:39 -0800
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 16:18 +0100
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 09:33 -0600
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 18:10 +0100
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 11:38 -0600
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:37 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 12:42 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 12:47 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 12:51 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 10:46 -0800
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 13:55 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:57 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:33 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 11:56 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:21 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:58 -0800
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 15:59 -0600
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 11:55 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 20:42 +0100
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:27 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:11 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:09 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-09 12:06 -0800
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 10:03 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 10:22 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 17:25 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-08 12:45 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 18:08 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 13:16 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 18:43 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 13:49 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 14:50 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-08 18:59 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-08 19:04 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 10:01 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:18 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 12:53 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-08 15:45 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-08 15:45 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-08 18:35 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-08 19:48 -0500
My desktop is blank. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 17:14 -0800
Re: My desktop is blank. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 20:17 -0500
My desktop is blank. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 17:24 -0800
Re: My desktop is blank. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 20:44 -0500
40tude_Dialog. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 20:51 -0800
My desktop is blank. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 17:15 -0800
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 22:00 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 22:57 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 18:06 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 16:53 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-08 16:10 -0800
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 12:56 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-08 12:37 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 19:27 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 14:08 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-07 14:50 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 16:45 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-08 15:49 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 07:59 -0800
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-08 16:16 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 11:26 -0500
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-08 15:47 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-08 15:47 -0700
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 07:52 -0800
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-07 22:58 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-08 01:37 +0000
Re: Richard Stallman on Valve/Steam gaming. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-08 14:37 +0000
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 10:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1qdk3$1u9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331853 |
On 2015-11-09 9:17 AM, chrisv wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> some dumb fsck wrote: >>> >>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>>> >>>> One of their hailed "innovations" is a crude form of virtual desktops, >>>> something which has been possible on Linux for the past TWENTY YEARS >>>> (at least). >>> >>> Windows virtual desktops are in no way "crude". They're at least >>> functionally equivalent to most Linux virtual desktop implementations. >> >> Except that they aren't >> >>> In some ways they're better. >> >> Really? Care to name some of these "better" ways? > > It's amazing how these Wintrolls lie through their teeth, eh? Utterly > shameless! Says the asshole who is constantly shown to be lying and then dares to claim that he's honest. > Remember when DumFSck argued that a single Windows machine appearing > at #58 on the top-500 list of supercomputers was some kind of Windows > victory? > > I guess because, on a list of 500 machines, 442 were behind it, while > only 57 were ahead of it. > > LOL > > I mean, you just could not make up such brain-damaged fsckwittery! Says the asshole who claims to have a degree in engineering despite being ignorant of one of its most basic lessons. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 17:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.08.17.26.05@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #331642 |
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 09:53:10 -0500, DFS wrote: > > Windows virtual desktops are in no way "crude". > Then why weren't they available twenty years ago? > > They're at least > functionally equivalent to most Linux virtual desktop implementations. > Can you scroll between desktops using the mouse? No -- and it's a big "No." > > The Expo VD included with Mint > Mint is for idiots. There are window managers available for Linux that will beat the pants off Microsoft's garbage any day. Does Microsoft even offer a choice? Another big "No." > > Half-ass hobbyware strikes again. > During the many, many vacant years of no available VDs in Microsoft, I used a hobbyist virtual desktop to make up the deficiency: http://virtuawin.sourceforge.net This software is STILL BETTER than the current junk in W10. Hobbyware puts MS to shame.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 12:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1o1k7$a2$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331677 |
On 2015-11-08 12:25 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 09:53:10 -0500, DFS wrote: > > >> >> Windows virtual desktops are in no way "crude". >> > > Then why weren't they available twenty years ago? Because the feature is useless. I've used Windows 10 since release and have yet to come up with even one reason why I would want virtual desktops. >> They're at least >> functionally equivalent to most Linux virtual desktop implementations. >> > > Can you scroll between desktops using the mouse? No -- and it's a > big "No." Actually, you can. It only depends what kind of mouse you have. >> The Expo VD included with Mint >> > > Mint is for idiots. There are window managers available for Linux > that will beat the pants off Microsoft's garbage any day. No, there aren't. No amount of delusion will make that a reality. > Does Microsoft even offer a choice? Another big "No." It doesn't have to: the whole world has seen the alternative but decided that Windows offers more and in better form. >> Half-ass hobbyware strikes again. >> > > During the many, many vacant years of no available VDs in Microsoft, > I used a hobbyist virtual desktop to make up the deficiency: > > http://virtuawin.sourceforge.net > > This software is STILL BETTER than the current junk in W10. > > Hobbyware puts MS to shame. That must be why people steer themselves away from hobbyware as though it was the Black Plague. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 18:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.08.18.08.53@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #331685 |
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:45:51 -0500, Slimer wrote: >> >> Then why weren't they available twenty years ago? > > > Because the feature is useless. I've used Windows 10 since release and > have yet to come up with even one reason why I would want virtual desktops. > Ha, ha, ha, ha! You must compute like a little girl, or an old woman. (Yes, a retarded little girl or a senile old woman.) The virtual desktop is the most useful tool to eliminate clutter and induce extreme ease and convenience to the computing experience. No one with half a brain would ever pass it up. >> >> There are window managers available for Linux >> that will beat the pants off Microsoft's garbage any day. > > No, there aren't. No amount of delusion will make that a reality. > Oh yeah? Can you add extra buttons to your windows with Microsoft? No f****** way! On Linux I can define up to TEN extra buttons on my windows to serve various functions. Now what say you? >> >> Does Microsoft even offer a choice? Another big "No." > > It doesn't have to: the whole world has seen the alternative but decided > that Windows offers more and in better form. > When it comes to things digital, the majority of the world can't distinguish their arse from a hole in the ground. Such clueless idiots will take whatever is shoved down their throats and never suspect the wretchedness of the product.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 13:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1lruh9j71lr7y$.ymtd8phvg0mx.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331695 |
On 8 Nov 2015 18:08:53 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:45:51 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >>> >>> Then why weren't they available twenty years ago? >> >> >> Because the feature is useless. I've used Windows 10 since release and >> have yet to come up with even one reason why I would want virtual desktops. >> > > Ha, ha, ha, ha! You must compute like a little girl, or an old woman. > (Yes, a retarded little girl or a senile old woman.) > > The virtual desktop is the most useful tool to eliminate clutter and > induce extreme ease and convenience to the computing experience. No one > with half a brain would ever pass it up. > > > >>> >>> There are window managers available for Linux >>> that will beat the pants off Microsoft's garbage any day. >> >> No, there aren't. No amount of delusion will make that a reality. >> > > Oh yeah? Can you add extra buttons to your windows with Microsoft? > > No f****** way! > > On Linux I can define up to TEN extra buttons on my windows to serve > various functions. > > Now what say you? > > > >>> >>> Does Microsoft even offer a choice? Another big "No." >> >> It doesn't have to: the whole world has seen the alternative but decided >> that Windows offers more and in better form. >> > > When it comes to things digital, the majority of the world can't distinguish > their arse from a hole in the ground. > > Such clueless idiots will take whatever is shoved down their throats and > never suspect the wretchedness of the product. And while you Linux loons are tinkering with your system, us Windows users are running the top tier applications. Oh and we also have access to some of the better (that's not saying much for most though) FOSS applications like LibreOffice, VLC, mplayer, gimp, ardour, audacity etc. So in effect, us Windows users have more choice when it comes to QUALITY applications than you Linux loons do. And we get to run them on the latest high quality hardware utilizing all the advanced features of that hardware. Linux? Good luck. BTW, while virtual desktops are nice my 3 Samsung 27 inch LED monitors are more than enough for me. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 18:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.08.18.41.31@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #331697 |
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:16:51 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > > And while you Linux loons are tinkering with your system, us Windows users > are running the top tier applications. > Believe it or not, I have everything that you have and a lot more. (Well, I stopped with Photoshop 6 because I refuse to participate in software-as-a-service subscriptions.) But I still prefer Linux/OSS because they possess a far more professional "feel," and configurability and extensibility are far more competent. Heck, Microsoft, after all these long years, still has not made available basic SIMD capability through its APIs. This is truly shameful. I keep Microsoft alive in order to accommodate the idiots of the world. I do my work in Linux and then, when necessary, pass it through Microsoft Windows before packaging and presenting to an external moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 13:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1wtweh9kq2f9j.19yrqz2zup3vn$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331704 |
On 8 Nov 2015 18:43:08 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:16:51 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> >> And while you Linux loons are tinkering with your system, us Windows users >> are running the top tier applications. >> > > Believe it or not, I have everything that you have and a lot more. > > (Well, I stopped with Photoshop 6 because I refuse to participate > in software-as-a-service subscriptions.) > > But I still prefer Linux/OSS because they possess a far more professional > "feel," and configurability and extensibility are far more competent. > > Heck, Microsoft, after all these long years, still has not made available > basic SIMD capability through its APIs. This is truly shameful. > > I keep Microsoft alive in order to accommodate the idiots of the world. > I do my work in Linux and then, when necessary, pass it through Microsoft > Windows before packaging and presenting to an external moron. So the other 98.5 percent of the planet that uses something other than Linux are morons but only the Linux users are superior? That's funny. Hint: The right tool for the job goes a long way towards productivity. For *you* that tool might be Linux. For the other 98.5 percent it's something other than Linux. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 14:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1k1efh18wmnuq.1lc5g8zk0q5p7.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331704 |
On 8 Nov 2015 18:43:08 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:16:51 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> >> And while you Linux loons are tinkering with your system, us Windows users >> are running the top tier applications. >> > > Believe it or not, I have everything that you have and a lot more. No you don't. And certainly not at the same level of quality, features and support. Stop kidding yourself. > (Well, I stopped with Photoshop 6 because I refuse to participate > in software-as-a-service subscriptions.) You'll find this difficult to believe, but I agree with you. If I had an alternative to subscriptions I would move on but I don't. Many people feel the same way with that model of software licensing. > But I still prefer Linux/OSS because they possess a far more professional > "feel," and configurability and extensibility are far more competent. Specifically how? Give examples. Just so you know, this is a popular topic in COLA and to date not a single Linux advocate has been able to build a case for what you are saying. Configuration? I'll give you that as Linux allows the end user to configure just about everything and to the most minute level. So how does this improve your productivity and how much time do you spend tinkering vs getting work done? > Heck, Microsoft, after all these long years, still has not made available > basic SIMD capability through its APIs. This is truly shameful. Just what an average user needs. <rolls eyes> Linux, after all these long years, still can't manage to get power management, to work correctly. Especially on laptops. Which one do you think is more important to an average user? > I keep Microsoft alive in order to accommodate the idiots of the world. > I do my work in Linux and then, when necessary, pass it through Microsoft > Windows before packaging and presenting to an external moron. Sounds like you are creating extra work for yourself. There is an idiot in COLA who gets Word documents, modifies them in LibreOffice and then converts them back to DOCx and sends them on their way. He has MSOffice BTW. I wonder if his bosses would approve of that. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 18:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1onhl$sn9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331704 |
On 11/8/2015 1:43 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:16:51 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> >> And while you Linux loons are tinkering with your system, us Windows users >> are running the top tier applications. >> > > Believe it or not, I have everything that you have and a lot more. > > (Well, I stopped with Photoshop 6 because I refuse to participate > in software-as-a-service subscriptions.) > > But I still prefer Linux/OSS because they possess a far more professional > "feel," and configurability and extensibility are far more competent. > > Heck, Microsoft, after all these long years, still has not made available > basic SIMD capability through its APIs. This is truly shameful. > > I keep Microsoft alive in order to accommodate the idiots of the world. > I do my work in Linux and then, when necessary, pass it through Microsoft > Windows before packaging and presenting to an external moron. heh! Another Linux "advocate" who whines about MS at night, but makes 100% of his living with their products by day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 19:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1onq4$u6r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331743 |
On 2015-11-08 6:59 PM, DFS wrote: > On 11/8/2015 1:43 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:16:51 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >> >>> >>> And while you Linux loons are tinkering with your system, us Windows >>> users >>> are running the top tier applications. >>> >> >> Believe it or not, I have everything that you have and a lot more. >> >> (Well, I stopped with Photoshop 6 because I refuse to participate >> in software-as-a-service subscriptions.) >> >> But I still prefer Linux/OSS because they possess a far more professional >> "feel," and configurability and extensibility are far more competent. >> >> Heck, Microsoft, after all these long years, still has not made available >> basic SIMD capability through its APIs. This is truly shameful. >> >> I keep Microsoft alive in order to accommodate the idiots of the world. >> I do my work in Linux and then, when necessary, pass it through Microsoft >> Windows before packaging and presenting to an external moron. > > > heh! > > Another Linux "advocate" who whines about MS at night, but makes 100% of > his living with their products by day. He should show Microsoft how pissed he is about their behaviour by programming for Linux exclusively. That'll show 'em. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 10:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1qcbh$rvi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331744 |
On 11/8/2015 7:04 PM, Slimer wrote:
> On 2015-11-08 6:59 PM, DFS wrote:
>> On 11/8/2015 1:43 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
>>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:16:51 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> And while you Linux loons are tinkering with your system, us Windows
>>>> users
>>>> are running the top tier applications.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Believe it or not, I have everything that you have and a lot more.
>>>
>>> (Well, I stopped with Photoshop 6 because I refuse to participate
>>> in software-as-a-service subscriptions.)
>>>
>>> But I still prefer Linux/OSS because they possess a far more professional
>>> "feel," and configurability and extensibility are far more competent.
>>>
>>> Heck, Microsoft, after all these long years, still has not made available
>>> basic SIMD capability through its APIs. This is truly shameful.
>>>
>>> I keep Microsoft alive in order to accommodate the idiots of the world.
>>> I do my work in Linux and then, when necessary, pass it through Microsoft
>>> Windows before packaging and presenting to an external moron.
>>
>>
>> heh!
>>
>> Another Linux "advocate" who whines about MS at night, but makes 100% of
>> his living with their products by day.
>
> He should show Microsoft how pissed he is about their behaviour by
> programming for Linux exclusively. That'll show 'em.
These "advocates" are silly mfs, that's for sure. The worst of the
creepy hypocrites is Chris Ahlstrom:
* "I wouldn't work for Microsoft for a billion dollars." (but he'll
write Windows code for 20+ years for a tiny fraction of it)
* "I've never bought anything but Windows laptops. For years now."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 16:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1r2f4$qr4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331868 |
On 2015-11-09 10:01 AM, DFS wrote: > On 11/8/2015 7:04 PM, Slimer wrote: >> On 2015-11-08 6:59 PM, DFS wrote: >>> On 11/8/2015 1:43 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:16:51 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And while you Linux loons are tinkering with your system, us Windows >>>>> users >>>>> are running the top tier applications. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Believe it or not, I have everything that you have and a lot more. >>>> >>>> (Well, I stopped with Photoshop 6 because I refuse to participate >>>> in software-as-a-service subscriptions.) >>>> >>>> But I still prefer Linux/OSS because they possess a far more >>>> professional >>>> "feel," and configurability and extensibility are far more competent. >>>> >>>> Heck, Microsoft, after all these long years, still has not made >>>> available >>>> basic SIMD capability through its APIs. This is truly shameful. >>>> >>>> I keep Microsoft alive in order to accommodate the idiots of the world. >>>> I do my work in Linux and then, when necessary, pass it through >>>> Microsoft >>>> Windows before packaging and presenting to an external moron. >>> >>> >>> heh! >>> >>> Another Linux "advocate" who whines about MS at night, but makes 100% of >>> his living with their products by day. >> >> He should show Microsoft how pissed he is about their behaviour by >> programming for Linux exclusively. That'll show 'em. > > > These "advocates" are silly mfs, that's for sure. The worst of the > creepy hypocrites is Chris Ahlstrom: > > * "I wouldn't work for Microsoft for a billion dollars." (but he'll > write Windows code for 20+ years for a tiny fraction of it) > > * "I've never bought anything but Windows laptops. For years now." What a little weenie he is. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 20:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1orpd$a29$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331704 |
On 11/8/2015 1:43 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > Heck, Microsoft, after all these long years, still has not made available > basic SIMD capability through its APIs. This is truly shameful. "The XMVECTOR and XMMATRIX types are the work horses for the DirectXMath Library. Every operation consumes or produces data of these types. Working with them is key to using the library. However, since DirectXMath makes use of the SIMD instruction sets, these data types are subject to a number of restrictions. It is critical that you understand these restrictions if you want to make good use of the DirectXMath functions." https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ee418725(v=vs.85).aspx > I keep Microsoft alive in order to accommodate the idiots of the world. ie: you, your boyfriend and your parents. > I do my work in Linux and then, when necessary, pass it through Microsoft > Windows before packaging and presenting to an external moron. heh! What kind of "work" do you do?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 12:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4o2dnZxD0KVZZN3LnZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #331754 |
On 11/08/15 18:12, DFS wrote: > On 11/8/2015 1:43 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > > >> Heck, Microsoft, after all these long years, still has not made available >> basic SIMD capability through its APIs. This is truly shameful. > > > "The XMVECTOR and XMMATRIX types are the work horses for the DirectXMath > Library. Every operation consumes or produces data of these types. > Working with them is key to using the library. However, since > DirectXMath makes use of the SIMD instruction sets, these data types are > subject to a number of restrictions. It is critical that you understand > these restrictions if you want to make good use of the DirectXMath > functions." > > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ee418725(v=vs.85).aspx > > > > > >> I keep Microsoft alive in order to accommodate the idiots of the world. > > ie: you, your boyfriend and your parents. > > > >> I do my work in Linux and then, when necessary, pass it through Microsoft >> Windows before packaging and presenting to an external moron. > > > heh! What kind of "work" do you do? > > From the sound of it, he may be Dumb willie's brother and works as a night time janitor. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 15:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fKKdncGW1LcCTaLLnZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #331697 |
On 11/08/15 11:16, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On 8 Nov 2015 18:08:53 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: > >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:45:51 -0500, Slimer wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Then why weren't they available twenty years ago? >>> >>> >>> Because the feature is useless. I've used Windows 10 since release and >>> have yet to come up with even one reason why I would want virtual desktops. >>> >> >> Ha, ha, ha, ha! You must compute like a little girl, or an old woman. >> (Yes, a retarded little girl or a senile old woman.) >> >> The virtual desktop is the most useful tool to eliminate clutter and >> induce extreme ease and convenience to the computing experience. No one >> with half a brain would ever pass it up. >> >> >> >>>> >>>> There are window managers available for Linux >>>> that will beat the pants off Microsoft's garbage any day. >>> >>> No, there aren't. No amount of delusion will make that a reality. >>> >> >> Oh yeah? Can you add extra buttons to your windows with Microsoft? >> >> No f****** way! >> >> On Linux I can define up to TEN extra buttons on my windows to serve >> various functions. >> >> Now what say you? >> >> >> >>>> >>>> Does Microsoft even offer a choice? Another big "No." >>> >>> It doesn't have to: the whole world has seen the alternative but decided >>> that Windows offers more and in better form. >>> >> >> When it comes to things digital, the majority of the world can't distinguish >> their arse from a hole in the ground. >> >> Such clueless idiots will take whatever is shoved down their throats and >> never suspect the wretchedness of the product. > > And while you Linux loons are tinkering with your system, us Windows users > are running the top tier applications. Oh and we also have access to some > of the better (that's not saying much for most though) FOSS applications > like LibreOffice, VLC, mplayer, gimp, ardour, audacity etc. > > So in effect, us Windows users have more choice when it comes to QUALITY > applications than you Linux loons do. > > And we get to run them on the latest high quality hardware utilizing all > the advanced features of that hardware. > > Linux? > > Good luck. > > BTW, while virtual desktops are nice my 3 Samsung 27 inch LED monitors are > more than enough for me. > Linux... the branding kiss of death. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 15:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fKKdncaW1LccTaLLnZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #331695 |
On 11/08/15 11:08, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:45:51 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >>> >>> Then why weren't they available twenty years ago? >> >> >> Because the feature is useless. I've used Windows 10 since release and >> have yet to come up with even one reason why I would want virtual desktops. >> > > Ha, ha, ha, ha! You must compute like a little girl, or an old woman. > (Yes, a retarded little girl or a senile old woman.) > Typical linux loon response. Only true geeks use linux. They have this need to tinker. > The virtual desktop is the most useful tool to eliminate clutter and > induce extreme ease and convenience to the computing experience. No one > with half a brain would ever pass it up. > > > >>> >>> There are window managers available for Linux >>> that will beat the pants off Microsoft's garbage any day. >> >> No, there aren't. No amount of delusion will make that a reality. >> > > Oh yeah? Can you add extra buttons to your windows with Microsoft? > > No f****** way! What for? I can program an app with my own custom buttons. > > On Linux I can define up to TEN extra buttons on my windows to serve > various functions. So? What would you need 10 extra buttons for? > > Now what say you? > > Guffaw!!! > >>> >>> Does Microsoft even offer a choice? Another big "No." >> >> It doesn't have to: the whole world has seen the alternative but decided >> that Windows offers more and in better form. >> > > When it comes to things digital, the majority of the world can't distinguish > their arse from a hole in the ground. > Guffaw!!! > Such clueless idiots will take whatever is shoved down their throats and > never suspect the wretchedness of the product. > But it looks like you are trying to shove linux down the publics throat. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 18:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1om4d$o0i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331695 |
On 2015-11-08 1:08 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:45:51 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >>> >>> Then why weren't they available twenty years ago? >> >> >> Because the feature is useless. I've used Windows 10 since release and >> have yet to come up with even one reason why I would want virtual desktops. >> > > Ha, ha, ha, ha! You must compute like a little girl, or an old woman. > (Yes, a retarded little girl or a senile old woman.) > > The virtual desktop is the most useful tool to eliminate clutter and > induce extreme ease and convenience to the computing experience. No one > with half a brain would ever pass it up. And yet most people haven't even noticed that Windows 10 supported virtual desktops as a result of a lack of need for such a feature. If you're a programmer, you might make use of such a thing but most people won't and are quite happy with simply minimizing programs which are not at use. >>> There are window managers available for Linux >>> that will beat the pants off Microsoft's garbage any day. >> >> No, there aren't. No amount of delusion will make that a reality. >> > > Oh yeah? Can you add extra buttons to your windows with Microsoft? > > No f****** way! > > On Linux I can define up to TEN extra buttons on my windows to serve > various functions. > > Now what say you? You mean to the window bar? Why would anyone care about such a feature? >>> Does Microsoft even offer a choice? Another big "No." >> >> It doesn't have to: the whole world has seen the alternative but decided >> that Windows offers more and in better form. >> > > When it comes to things digital, the majority of the world can't distinguish > their arse from a hole in the ground. > > Such clueless idiots will take whatever is shoved down their throats and > never suspect the wretchedness of the product. I'm sure that Microsoft is very upset that they can't get that 1.5% of computer users which never pay for software at all. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 19:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1oqdk$62l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331695 |
On 11/8/2015 1:08 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > The virtual desktop is the most useful tool to eliminate clutter and > induce extreme ease and convenience to the computing experience. You mean spread the clutter to multiple desktops. If you're organized, one desktop is plenty. All this talk of "I keep my 8 programming apps open on one desktop, and 6 email-related apps on another, and news on another" is total bullshit. The avg number of apps Linux people have running is about 5. https://chani.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/quick-poll/ > No one with half a brain would ever pass it up. The smartest people in the world use MS Windows, and have for decades, and few to none of them run multiple desktops. Apparently few Linux loons do, either, as evidenced by the fact that Mint - the most popular distro on distrowatch - now disables multiple desktops by default.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 17:14 -0800 |
| Subject | My desktop is blank. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.8{5.14P.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #331748 |
My desktop is blank, always, like this: Jeff-Relf.Me/MyDesktop.PNG Instead, I use folders.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 20:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: My desktop is blank. |
| Message-ID | <xpengi5pqc6i.lspezmj7zgen$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331756 |
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:14:32 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > My desktop is blank, always, like this: > > Jeff-Relf.Me/MyDesktop.PNG > > Instead, I use folders. Evidently so is your brain. Link? -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web