Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #474813 > unrolled thread

Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus

Started bymaureenshoopie@gmail.com
First post2018-11-02 06:20 -0700
Last post2018-11-03 10:07 +0100
Articles 20 on this page of 166 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus maureenshoopie@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 06:20 -0700
    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 07:59 -0700
    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:42 -0400
      Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-02 09:26 -0700
        Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 16:21 -0400
        Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 20:16 -0700
      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 11:45 -0700
        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 21:17 -0700
        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:08 +0100
          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:42 -0400
            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:22 -0700
            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 12:52 -0700
      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 03:30 -0700
        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:46 -0400
          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 13:50 -0700
            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 14:11 -0700
            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 17:30 -0400
              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 15:49 -0700
              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 18:15 -0700
                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 18:36 -0700
                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:11 -0700
                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 00:19 -0700
                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 11:30 -0700
                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 20:17 +0100
                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 12:28 -0700
                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 11:50 -0800
                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 11:34 -0800
                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-04 15:03 -0500
                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-04 20:16 +0000
                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000
                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:18 -0700
                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 23:46 -0800
                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000
                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 14:42 -0800
                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 16:08 -0700
                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 15:28 -0800
                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 00:17 -0800
                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 07:26 -0600
                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:08 -0700
                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 07:22 -0600
                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:06 -0800
                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 10:08 -0600
                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:14 -0800
                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:34 -0700
                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:37 -0700
                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 11:11 -0500
                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 10:49 -0600
                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:08 -0800
                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:20 -0700
                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:27 -0800
                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 12:14 -0600
                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 17:32 -0500
                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 15:41 -0700
                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 07:03 -0600
                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 05:20 -0800
                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 08:06 -0700
                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:11 -0800
                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:22 -0700
                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 14:53 -0600
                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 13:22 -0800
                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 14:23 -0700
                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 16:07 -0800
                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:35 -0500
                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 17:38 -0800
                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 21:01 -0500
                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 18:37 -0800
                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 21:56 -0500
                                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:04 -0700
                                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:23 -0800
                                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 08:03 -0600
                                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 06:30 -0800
                                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 06:53 -0800
                                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:08 -0800
                                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:19 -0800
                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 09:45 -0700
                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:46 -0500
                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:51 -0700
                                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0500
                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:55 -0700
                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:23 -0800
                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:11 -0800
                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:15 -0700
                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 13:45 -0500
                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:59 -0700
                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 05:53 +0000
                                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 04:47 -0800
                                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 08:53 -0500
                                                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 06:17 -0800
                                                            How many "friends" can you afford ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-07 06:29 -0800
                                                              Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:51 -0800
                                                              Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 11:46 -0500
                                                                I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-09 10:35 -0800
                                                                  Re: I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 22:07 -0800
                                                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:35 -0700
                                                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 10:47 -0800
                                                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 11:03 -0800
                                                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 12:22 -0700
                                                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 18:05 -0500
                                                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-08 09:02 -0500
                                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:36 -0700
                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0600
                                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 11:59 -0800
                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:27 -0800
                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 14:13 -0800
                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:19 -0700
                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 14:41 -0600
                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:55 -0800
                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 13:41 -0800
                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 14:31 -0800
                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 15:00 -0800
                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 15:18 -0800
                                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:25 -0700
                                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 19:31 -0800
                                                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:38 -0800
                                                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:59 -0800
                                                            Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-06 21:13 -0800
                                                              Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-07 01:13 -0500
                                                              Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 23:20 -0800
                                                              Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 12:06 -0500
                                                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 04:45 -0800
                                                              We hate the sin not the sinner. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-07 06:18 -0800
                                                                Re: We hate the sin not the sinner. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:36 -0800
                                                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 08:38 -0800
                                                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:34 -0700
                                                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 14:47 -0800
                                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 16:19 -0800
                                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:08 -0700
                                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 05:29 -0800
                                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 16:50 -0800
                                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:07 -0700
                                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-08 03:32 -0800
                                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 03:55 -0800
                                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 07:36 -0800
                                                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 08:55 -0700
                                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 08:37 -0800
                                                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 09:08 -0800
                                                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 11:10 -0700
                                                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 17:33 -0800
                                                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:38 -0700
                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-07 07:02 -0600
                                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 08:54 -0800
                                                          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:32 -0700
                                                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 04:46 +0000
                                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 21:05 -0800
                                              Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 10:46 -0600
                                                Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:04 -0700
                                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:00 -0700
                                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:07 -0800
                                  Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:05 -0700
                            Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:36 -0700
                    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:10 -0800
                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:52 -0800
                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-04 17:53 -0500
                        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 16:10 -0700
                      Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:23 -0700
        Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:20 -0700
          Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
    Don't work for Google. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-02 08:43 -0700
      Re: Don't work for Google. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:48 -0400
        Re: Don't work for Google. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-02 11:00 -0500
          Re: Don't work for Google. Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100
            Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 02:29 -0700
        Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 09:16 -0700
      Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 09:01 -0700
    Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100

Page 1 of 9  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →


#474813 — Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus

Frommaureenshoopie@gmail.com
Date2018-11-02 06:20 -0700
SubjectFailing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus
Message-ID<7ff6835f-89eb-4366-90e7-5ab3a331d511@googlegroups.com>
Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million dollars. Nice corporate culture.

No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.

With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than useless and failing IBM.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#474823

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-02 07:59 -0700
Message-ID<5689b09b-649f-4709-b7c4-7ea43b3632c1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#474813
On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 6:20:56 AM UTC-7, maureen...@gmail.com wrote:
> Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million dollars. Nice corporate culture.
> 
> No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.
> 
> With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than useless and failing IBM.



Do you believe the bullshit Klaus Schadenfreude is pushing? 

Several of us reported him years ago. As expected, it did not a thing to stop the bozo. Why the added task to view data via ODBC connectivity in a desktop system? Of course, Klaus Schadenfreude didn't define this as part of his, predictably, always growing 'barometer'. I persist in being unconvinced that these nonstop posts are automated. 

--
Get Rich Slow!
https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU_evUKollmjeuJy5V5UMotPUs65Q7YM6
https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#474829

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-11-02 11:42 -0400
Message-ID<Uf_CD.766019$3L2.292536@fx44.iad>
In reply to#474813
On 2018-11-02 9:20 a.m., maureenshoopie@gmail.com wrote:
> Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million dollars. Nice corporate culture.
> 
> No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.
> 
> With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than useless and failing IBM.

Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on 
trial, we shouldn't be demonizing him just yet. History has shown that 
women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.


-- 
SilverSlimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#474838 — Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-11-02 09:26 -0700
SubjectAndy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.2--9.26am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#474829
> History has shown that women will lie, 
> repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.

True, however this one is different.  New York Times says:

  In a civil suit filed this month by [Andy] Rubin’s 
  ex-wife, Rie Rubin, she claimed he had multiple 
  “ownership relationships” with other women during 
  their marriage, paying hundreds of thousands of 
  dollars to them. The couple were divorced in August.    

  The suit included a screenshot of an August 2015 
  email Mr. Rubin sent to one woman. “You will be happy 
  being taken care of,” he wrote. “Being owned is kinda 
  like you are my property, and I can loan you to other people.”    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#474876 — Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin.

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-02 16:21 -0400
SubjectRe: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin.
Message-ID<pribkh$1jtk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#474838
On 11/2/2018 12:26 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> History has shown that women will lie,
>> repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.
> 
> True, however this one is different.  New York Times says:
> 
>    In a civil suit filed this month by [Andy] Rubin’s
>    ex-wife, Rie Rubin, she claimed he had multiple
>    “ownership relationships” with other women during
>    their marriage, paying hundreds of thousands of
>    dollars to them. The couple were divorced in August.
> 
>    The suit included a screenshot of an August 2015
>    email Mr. Rubin sent to one woman. “You will be happy
>    being taken care of,” he wrote. “Being owned is kinda
>    like you are my property, and I can loan you to other people.”
> 
Nads has said she "owned" me on numerous occasions.
It wasn't so bad. I"m still waiting for the hundreds of thousands of 
dollars, however.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#474939 — Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin.

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-02 20:16 -0700
SubjectRe: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin.
Message-ID<90fc6d6e-6ada-452d-8a80-94beb32f330f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#474838
On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 9:26:55 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > History has shown that women will lie, 
> > repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.
> 
> True, however this one is different.  New York Times says:
> 
>   In a civil suit filed this month by [Andy] Rubin’s 
>   ex-wife, Rie Rubin, she claimed he had multiple 
>   “ownership relationships” with other women during 
>   their marriage, paying hundreds of thousands of 
>   dollars to them. The couple were divorced in August.    
> 
>   The suit included a screenshot of an August 2015 
>   email Mr. Rubin sent to one woman. “You will be happy 
>   being taken care of,” he wrote. “Being owned is kinda 
>   like you are my property, and I can loan you to other people.”



A shadow of justification, projected by Sockboy, at the wrong time. 

Rambling cretin. Proof Sandman accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png. 

-- 
Eight things to never feed your dog!!
https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4
https://redd.it/6sfhq6
https://redd.it/6sfhq6
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#474865

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-02 11:45 -0700
Message-ID<g43kabF74coU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#474829
On 11/2/18 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-11-02 9:20 a.m., maureenshoopie@gmail.com wrote:
>> Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million 
>> dollars. Nice corporate culture.
>>
>> No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than 
>> Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.
>>
>> With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than 
>> useless and failing IBM.
> 
> Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on 
> trial, we shouldn't be demonizing him just yet. History has shown that 
> women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.
> 
> 
Just women?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#474950

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-02 21:17 -0700
Message-ID<bbccc34e-fb35-4e06-91ce-d6e86dd9ecb5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#474865
On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 11:45:35 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 11/2/18 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > On 2018-11-02 9:20 a.m., maureenshoopie@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million 
> >> dollars. Nice corporate culture.
> >>
> >> No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than 
> >> Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.
> >>
> >> With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than 
> >> useless and failing IBM.
> > 
> > Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on 
> > trial, we shouldn't be demonizing him just yet. History has shown that 
> > women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.
> > 
> > 
> Just women?
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>



Other than HWSNBN, who *doesn't* know what I'm doing? All that HWSNBN cares about is that HWSNBN gets to deliver his robocall and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Klaus Schadenfreude is a real person on the other end of the phone is his motivation. Your system will crawl while downloading the mass of flood posts. Promotion is a wonderful thing and consumer cluelessness is even better. 

I could counter HWSNBN honestly but he is a blockhead who distorts your words to effect his craving to call everyone a fool. Hint: You can not go into a meet and greet, gulp down all the grog, screw all the furniture, heist the china, and barf in the porch without being treated with contempt. 

--
This broke the Internet
https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq
http://www.5z8.info/peepshow_z9s9ht_dogporn
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#474973

FromHadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-03 10:08 +0100
Message-ID<87zhuqbk9w.fsf@gmail.com>
In reply to#474865
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

> On 11/2/18 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On 2018-11-02 9:20 a.m., maureenshoopie@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million
>>> dollars. Nice corporate culture.
>>>
>>> No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than
>>> Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.
>>>
>>> With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than useless and
>>> failing IBM.
>>
>> Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on trial, we
>> shouldn't be demonizing him just yet. History has shown that women will lie,
>> repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.
>>
>>
> Just women?

He didn't say "just women" you cretin. But when it comes to ruining
people through sexual allegations I would say "Mostly women",

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/02/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-referred-fbi-doj-investigation/1863210002/


-- 
chrisv alias turdv is a turd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475043

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-11-03 14:42 -0400
Message-ID<M_lDD.1315967$YL3.1045053@fx48.iad>
In reply to#474973
On 2018-11-03 5:08 a.m., Hadron Quark wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
> 
>> On 11/2/18 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> On 2018-11-02 9:20 a.m., maureenshoopie@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million
>>>> dollars. Nice corporate culture.
>>>>
>>>> No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than
>>>> Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.
>>>>
>>>> With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than useless and
>>>> failing IBM.
>>>
>>> Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on trial, we
>>> shouldn't be demonizing him just yet. History has shown that women will lie,
>>> repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.
>>>
>>>
>> Just women?
> 
> He didn't say "just women" you cretin. But when it comes to ruining
> people through sexual allegations I would say "Mostly women",
> 
> https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/02/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-referred-fbi-doj-investigation/1863210002/

I tend to keep away from female teachers nowadays unless I know that 
they're decent people. A few years ago, I befriended one and she knew, 
from day 1, that I was getting married at the end of the year. She still 
fell for me and made an ass of herself when I invited her to my wedding 
by claiming that I didn't truly love her. It became pretty clear that 
she wanted to be the one with the honour of being my wife. I'd like to 
say that it was an isolated event but it happens from time to time and 
they are very willing, if they don't get what they want, to make your 
life Hell.


-- 
SilverSlimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475059

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
Message-ID<g46blnFpnhjU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#475043
On 11/3/18 11:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-11-03 5:08 a.m., Hadron Quark wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 11/2/18 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>> On 2018-11-02 9:20 a.m., maureenshoopie@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million
>>>>> dollars. Nice corporate culture.
>>>>>
>>>>> No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than
>>>>> Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.
>>>>>
>>>>> With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than 
>>>>> useless and
>>>>> failing IBM.
>>>>
>>>> Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on 
>>>> trial, we
>>>> shouldn't be demonizing him just yet. History has shown that women 
>>>> will lie,
>>>> repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Just women?
>>
>> He didn't say "just women" you cretin. But when it comes to ruining
>> people through sexual allegations I would say "Mostly women",
>>
>> https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/02/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-referred-fbi-doj-investigation/1863210002/ 
>>
> 
> I tend to keep away from female teachers nowadays unless I know that 
> they're decent people.

Do you assume women are not? WHAT?

> A few years ago, I befriended one and she knew, 
> from day 1, that I was getting married at the end of the year. She still 
> fell for me and made an ass of herself when I invited her to my wedding 
> by claiming that I didn't truly love her. It became pretty clear that 
> she wanted to be the one with the honour of being my wife. I'd like to 
> say that it was an isolated event but it happens from time to time and 
> they are very willing, if they don't get what they want, to make your 
> life Hell.

Do you think you make the life of those you verbally abuse pleasant?


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475055

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-03 12:22 -0700
Message-ID<g46aqtFpeumU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#474973
On 11/3/18 2:08 AM, Hadron Quark wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
> 
>> On 11/2/18 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> On 2018-11-02 9:20 a.m., maureenshoopie@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million
>>>> dollars. Nice corporate culture.
>>>>
>>>> No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than
>>>> Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.
>>>>
>>>> With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than useless and
>>>> failing IBM.
>>>
>>> Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on trial, we
>>> shouldn't be demonizing him just yet. History has shown that women will lie,
>>> repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.
>>>
>>>
>> Just women?
> 
> He didn't say "just women" you cretin.

Do you know what a question mark is?

> But when it comes to ruining
> people through sexual allegations I would say "Mostly women",

And when it comes to sexual assault it is mostly men. Though not fully, 
of course.

> https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/02/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-referred-fbi-doj-investigation/1863210002/
> 
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475065

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-03 12:52 -0700
Message-ID<4786c88e-2244-4e65-8c85-820822ca6174@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#475055
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:22:09 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 11/3/18 2:08 AM, Hadron Quark wrote:
> > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
> > 
> >> On 11/2/18 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>> On 2018-11-02 9:20 a.m., maureenshoopie@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> Andy Rubin sexually assaults a women so Google pays him $90 million
> >>>> dollars. Nice corporate culture.
> >>>>
> >>>> No wonder Google is worth billions less than Apple, billions less than
> >>>> Microsoft and billions less than Amazon.
> >>>>
> >>>> With dirtbag behavior like this they'll soon be worth less than useless and
> >>>> failing IBM.
> >>>
> >>> Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on trial, we
> >>> shouldn't be demonizing him just yet. History has shown that women will lie,
> >>> repeatedly if necessary, to get what they want.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Just women?
> > 
> > He didn't say "just women" you cretin.
> 
> Do you know what a question mark is?
> 
> > But when it comes to ruining
> > people through sexual allegations I would say "Mostly women",
> 
> And when it comes to sexual assault it is mostly men. Though not fully, 
> of course.
> 
> > https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/02/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-referred-fbi-doj-investigation/1863210002/
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>



Times change. Could be the concept of a newspaper is getting outdated. 

So Deplorable Owl changed his story to responding to him. Just give it up already. You're again trying to bolster yourself beyond your grade. You're the dull knife in the drawer and your many idiotic videos show this. I can tell from the manner Deplorable Owl posted - by getting wrong fundamentals of the Systemd and so forth - he has never studied a data-intensive issue in his life. Otherwise he would've understood the requirements like actually commenting your code! 

-- 
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!
https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo
http://www.5z8.info/hackwebcam_e9z2tw_friendster-of-sex
http://www.5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_g0w7hf_molotovcocktail
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#474979

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2018-11-03 03:30 -0700
Message-ID<69ff23c5-f9c9-492a-bd66-2f7592b1dac1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#474829
SilverSlimer wrote:
> Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on 
> trial, we shouldn't be demonizing him just yet. 

There’s also the consideration that Google found out enough such that 
they decided that it was worth $90M to them to pay to make it “go away”,
presumably to not have the lawsuit or affiliative negative media exposure.

> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, 
> to get what they want. 

And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what?


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475045

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-11-03 14:46 -0400
Message-ID<_1mDD.594833$cL2.555397@fx43.iad>
In reply to#474979
On 2018-11-03 6:30 a.m., -hh wrote:
> 
> SilverSlimer wrote:
>> Considering the man was only accused of something and didn't go on
>> trial, we shouldn't be demonizing him just yet.
> 
> There’s also the consideration that Google found out enough such that
> they decided that it was worth $90M to them to pay to make it “go away”,
> presumably to not have the lawsuit or affiliative negative media exposure.

Google has already shown that there is no such thing as "negative media 
exposure" with them. They've been shown to be some of the most unethical 
people in the world yet people still use their products. They could 
easily have disregard the women and not felt a single ounce of pain.

>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary,
>> to get what they want.
> 
> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what?

Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about 
sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do.

-- 
SilverSlimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475081

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2018-11-03 13:50 -0700
Message-ID<20cfcede-9564-4950-bb6e-97c6604a32f1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#475045
Slimmer wrote:
> >> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, 
>>> to get what they want. 
>> 
>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? 
>
> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about 
> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. 

Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”.

-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475082

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-03 14:11 -0700
Message-ID<af8fe785-041d-471f-9d98-c29258604ea0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#475081
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 1:50:40 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
> Slimmer wrote:
> > >> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, 
> >>> to get what they want. 
> >> 
> >> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? 
> >
> > Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about 
> > sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. 
> 
> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”.
> 
> -hh



Steve Carroll is a false advocate's biggest fear. 

Steve Carroll has a _lot_ of insight to share and he wishes to give back to the community. Of course this is I think the most frustrating venue for doing that because much of what he will get back is moaning, misleading and other phooey. This forum is a puss-filled cyst. Only what ronb wants matters to ronb. There is nothing Steve Carroll can do to change that. It's a medical issue and it is what it is. 

Dropping support for 16 bit apps is common sense. And given how regularly it is clear that ronb's post is some twist of  an observation Steve Carroll shared which had been a bodyslam on ronb for something he did which was foolish/inaccurate/etc... its truly a regular demonstration of ronb's unending distress for having been so routinely crushed: ronb is undeniably incapable of being shown a mirror. 



-- 
Best CMS Solution of 2017
https://www.facebook.com/jenny.eklund
https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo
http://www.5z8.info/myspace-of-sex_q7q7zl_instant-purchase
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475084

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-11-03 17:30 -0400
Message-ID<WroDD.372667$oH2.344973@fx10.iad>
In reply to#475081
On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote:
> Slimmer wrote:
>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary,
>>>> to get what they want.
>>>
>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what?
>>
>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about
>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do.
> 
> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”.

Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that 
a woman WON'T tell to get ahead.


-- 
SilverSlimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475096

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-03 15:49 -0700
Message-ID<g46n0fFs4r6U3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#475084
On 11/3/18 2:30 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote:
>> Slimmer wrote:
>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary,
>>>>> to get what they want.
>>>>
>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this 
>>>> misogyny is ... what?
>>>
>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about
>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do.
>>
>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”.
> 
> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that 
> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead.
> 
> 

Gee, but you are not a misogynist, right?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475119

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2018-11-03 18:15 -0700
Message-ID<a36d1f90-2682-48d9-9e4e-3978a808d88e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#475084
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote:
> > Slimmer wrote:
> >>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary,
> >>>> to get what they want.
> >>>
> >>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what?
> >>
> >> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about
> >> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do.
> > 
> > Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”.
> 
> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that 
> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead.

...HE lied.   /S


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 9  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web