Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #477170 > unrolled thread

Using port 465 (TLS) instead of 25 (PlainText), SMTP.

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Using port 465 (TLS) instead of 25 (PlainText), SMTP. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-13 15:25 -0800
    Re: Using port 465 (TLS) instead of 25 (PlainText), SMTP. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 15:49 -0800

#477170 — Using port 465 (TLS) instead of 25 (PlainText), SMTP.

Wolf K replied:
> > My email host Forced me to encrypt my outgoing emails,
> > using port 465 (TLS) instead of 25 (PlainText), SMTP.
> > 
> > Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG -- gMail.C and X.CPP in "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".
> 
> What's your email client? I have no problems with SS:L/TLS on 
> Thunderbird 60.3.0 on Win 8.1.

X.EXE in "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP"; see: "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM".
I (re)wrote it.

> " People worry that computers will get too smart
>   and take over the world, but the real problem is
>   that they’re too stupid and they’ve already taken over
>   the world " -- Pedro Domingos

So true.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#477173

On Tuesday, November 13, 2018 at 4:25:13 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Wolf K replied:
> > > My email host Forced me to encrypt my outgoing emails,
> > > using port 465 (TLS) instead of 25 (PlainText), SMTP.
> > > 
> > > Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG -- gMail.C and X.CPP in "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".
> > 
> > What's your email client? I have no problems with SS:L/TLS on 
> > Thunderbird 60.3.0 on Win 8.1.
> 
> X.EXE in "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP"; see: "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM".
> I (re)wrote it.
> 
> > " People worry that computers will get too smart
> >   and take over the world, but the real problem is
> >   that they’re too stupid and they’ve already taken over
> >   the world " -- Pedro Domingos
> 
> So true.



The advocates say searching for a price comparison for a FOSS application is attacking. Until or unless Flooder Carroll offers up his 'first-rate' GNU/Linux workflow for assessment, there is no challenge, just boisterous claims. 

Time to blame anything but Linux! It is clear from the way Flooder Carroll responded - by demanding basics of the language and so on - he has never understood a computationally complex task before. If he had he'd have understood the requirements of using real vs. integer types! 

That lame duck update system failed over and over again. 

Oh goodness, that is just tons of tripe. I am devotee of Wayland, because that's where all the stimulating innovation is happening. 



-- 
E-commerce Simplified!!
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU_evUKollmjeuJy5V5UMotPUs65Q7YM6
https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY
https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web