Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #452522 > unrolled thread

Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar.

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 18:32 -0700
    Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 19:03 -0700
      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:38 -0700
              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 00:43 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 05:07 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 06:25 -0700
            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 03:17 -0700
            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 22:25 -0700
        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:06 -0700

#452522 — Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar.

Nadegda replied:
> > > > it's worse than we thought!  Billions of Asians starving!
> >
> > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of
> > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
> > the billions of people overload on the planet ?
> 
> It's been well established that affording women full rights, including 
> economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about 
> unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready 
> access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in 
> birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed 
> population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.
> 
> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to 
> treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to 
> hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities...

Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front,
while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal.

In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ",
she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden.

Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted 
from his parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure;
the eviction came immediately after he lost visitation rights.

CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, 
if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course.

Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here,
because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
oddly, she's off the radar.

The Washington Post says:

  one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.  

  12.5 percent of women that age live at home. 

  Both numbers have increased dramatically in 
  recent decades, roughly doubling since 1960.  

  more young adults ages 18 to 34 were 
  living with their parents than with a spouse or partner, 
  the first time that's happened in at least 130 years.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#452523

On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 6:30:15 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Nadegda replied:
> > > > > it's worse than we thought!  Billions of Asians starving!
> > >
> > > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of
> > > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
> > > the billions of people overload on the planet ?
> > 
> > It's been well established that affording women full rights, including 
> > economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about 
> > unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready 
> > access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in 
> > birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed 
> > population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.
> > 
> > But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to 
> > treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to 
> > hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities...
> 
> Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front,
> while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal.
> 
> In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ",
> she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden.
> 
> Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted 
> from his parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure;
> the eviction came immediately after he lost visitation rights.
> 
> CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, 
> if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course.
> 
> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here,
> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> oddly, she's off the radar.
> 
> The Washington Post says:
> 
>   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.  
> 
>   12.5 percent of women that age live at home. 
> 
>   Both numbers have increased dramatically in 
>   recent decades, roughly doubling since 1960.  
> 
>   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were 
>   living with their parents than with a spouse or partner, 
>   the first time that's happened in at least 130 years.



Steve Petruzzellis shreds Snit in every way possible. Snit's posts are totally in all respects deceitful. There can be zero doubt that as soon as any recent 'blocked person' does one thing to hurt the inferior coward's feelings that they will be ignored again. Snit's posts are nothing but a senseless mess. 

A meaningless discourse by pseudo-experts, magnified by the reciprocal of the endless vastness of space, demonstrating the vast nothingness of Snit's so-called thought process. Already moved on from that. Take it as you want! See: I quoted examples of Snit falsely attributing someone else's words to me, showing off insecurity, etc. His response: to repeat the same nonsense. 

--
Best CMS Solution of 2017
http://www.5z8.info/horse-slaughter_w8c4en_launchexe
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452524 — Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> > oddly, she's off the radar.
> > 
> > The Washington Post says:
> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> 
> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?

Same with the Eastern world, kook.

Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452525 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 6:54:14 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> > > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> > > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> > > oddly, she's off the radar.
> > > 
> > > The Washington Post says:
> > >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> > >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> > >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> > >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> > >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> > 
> > Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> > affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> 
> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> 
> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <328ae2c8-12e1-4830-b455-53187a4bc309@googlegroups.com>, Steve 
Carroll wrote:

> > Sandman:
> > <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood> It doesn't show what
> > interval the script is run at, but how he has used it, at least in
> > the beginning. I stopped logging it this way back in may :)
> 
> From what I've personally looked at, it looks like it's all over the
> map.

Yes, with obvious scripted sessions. Not saying some of it isn't manual. 

> > Sandman:
> > Maybe I'll update it :)
> 
> What would it take to do that?

For "later" to occur!

<http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/postingtimes/Snit/Flooding>

That's a running tally of Snit's non-sock posts and his flooding during the 
last month. It'll update automatically and always show the last two months. 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZyKjaAAoJECFEwfBaA+jR4QEIAIWE3GfOGnnxynLfUhRnWv+l
OkvAvQ8GofGI1JjIOn7NnlyfGRV/JPiIzJmzoCrdV6uY9E9qaYOXScF4M5Vas4bv
2WqBlNIh7se9g6Zkj330L12RkuZckS5l0nJ++OTbmztOzLtAlrWKHADTiJ9u8JnR
BCjcAhMrjQ0Jwut34hJr57pzj7p88oYCPP46IcrEMbWnd03n43BGUVLGr9i9pYU+
7F6867hOzaFJ4DdRE52zv15yIYVUIHx7HFNNtV7ZfPRBRQQuyA403S8PM1RC/nQ/
RKau+ma21bzltpxlqTO+XAXMMLLZiGXy8hbv4Ib/tPlc5cKI3P6UDZ4exbbCmnE=
=1Dqa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

- 
Top Ten Ways John Gohde Trolls!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/RSikBcWxBLo
https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452526 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
>> > 
>> > The Washington Post says:
>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
>> 
>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>
> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>
> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
rarelly one can sepparate.

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452528 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
>>>>
>>>> The Washington Post says:
>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>>>>    with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
>>>
>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>
>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>
>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
> rarelly one can sepparate.
> 
but they all drive cadillacs

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452530 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Washington Post says:
>>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>>>>>    with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>>
>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>>
>>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
>>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
>>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
>> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
>> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
>> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
>> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
>> rarelly one can sepparate.
>> 
>but they all drive cadillacs

I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452532 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 8:07:23 PM UTC-7, Bricked wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> >> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> >>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> >>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> >>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> >>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Washington Post says:
> >>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> >>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> >>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> >>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> >>>>>    with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> >>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> >>>
> >>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> >>>
> >>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> >>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> >>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
> >> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
> >> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
> >> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
> >> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
> >> rarelly one can sepparate.
> >> 
> >but they all drive cadillacs
> 
> I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.



Michael Glasser Snit created at least 20 virtual systems in the last year or so. I am sure he and the herd are proud. It's Peter the Klöwn's problem but he blames Michael Glasser Snit. Obviously he would rather blame others than face reality. Being open source as it is, bulletin boards will never go away but it'll never be my cup of tea. 

--
Best CMS Solution of 2017!
http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_f8h9lv_-OPEN-WEBCAM---START-RECORD--
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452623 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 8:38:09 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 8:07:23 PM UTC-7, Bricked wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> > >> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> > >>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> > >>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> > >>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> > >>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The Washington Post says:
> > >>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> > >>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> > >>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> > >>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> > >>>>>    with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> > >>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> > >>>
> > >>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> > >>>
> > >>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> > >>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> > >>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
> > >> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
> > >> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
> > >> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
> > >> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
> > >> rarelly one can sepparate.
> > >> 
> > >but they all drive cadillacs
> > 
> > I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.
> 
> 
> 
> Michael Glasser Snit created at least 20 virtual systems in the last year or so. I am sure he and the herd are proud. It's Peter the Klöwn's problem but he blames Michael Glasser Snit. Obviously he would rather blame others than face reality. Being open source as it is, bulletin boards will never go away but it'll never be my cup of tea. 
> 
> --
> Best CMS Solution of 2017!
> http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_f8h9lv_-OPEN-WEBCAM---START-RECORD--
> Jonas Eklundh



Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
    -----
    Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
    -----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
    -----
    Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
    -----    
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
    -----
    I didn't write that.
    -----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE. 

Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days. 

So already Carroll's story is unlikely. 

But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in. 

But Carroll could not leave his story there.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
    -----
    Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being,
    don't trust anything from it.
    -----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*. 

This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable. 

Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!

He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
    -----
    Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account
    so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
    anything that's coming from it was written by me.
    -----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
    -----
    Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
    I may have to kill the account.
    -----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.

Just nonsense.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
    -----
    Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
    point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
    -----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
    -----
    They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
    didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
    hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
    -----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.

Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
    -----
    There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
    issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
    -----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist. 

The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back). 

My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
    -----
    The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
    this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
    one standing for some odd reason. 
    -----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.

Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
    -----
    And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
    their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
    password protected ;)
    -----
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.

Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely? Why has he not said anything about this? 

My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it. 

This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?

Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
    -----
    The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
    a feeble password on this account.
    -----
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.

His story changes with the telling.

But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently tried it with me.

Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
    -----
    The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
    Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
    it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
    account. 
    -----
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.

He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
    -----
    That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years, 
    feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
    info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
    this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
    to be ;)
    -----
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for certain? 

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
    -----
    Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
    proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
    charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
    for now.

    Do not think this is over.
    -----
    
No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies. 

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
    -----
    I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
    and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
    your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
    at Yavapai College contacts you.

    Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
    incest.

    See if those can not be quoted.
    -----
    
Direct lies and threats by Carroll.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
    -----
    You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
    years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
    was over a line.
    -----
    
A complete and utter lie from Carroll. 

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
    -----
    The above post is Snit hacking my account.
    -----
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
    -----
    You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
    anything from my fretwizzer account now that Snit and ebot have
    access to it.
    -----
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.

Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
    -----
    Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
    account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
    of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
    say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
    have never used.
    -----
    
No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.

--
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfhq6/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than/
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452631 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 12:43:48 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 8:38:09 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 8:07:23 PM UTC-7, Bricked wrote:
> > > On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> > > >> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> > > >>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> > > >>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> > > >>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> > > >>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The Washington Post says:
> > > >>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> > > >>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> > > >>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> > > >>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> > > >>>>>    with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> > > >>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> > > >>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> > > >>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
> > > >> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
> > > >> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
> > > >> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
> > > >> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
> > > >> rarelly one can sepparate.
> > > >> 
> > > >but they all drive cadillacs
> > > 
> > > I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Michael Glasser Snit created at least 20 virtual systems in the last year or so. I am sure he and the herd are proud. It's Peter the Klöwn's problem but he blames Michael Glasser Snit. Obviously he would rather blame others than face reality. Being open source as it is, bulletin boards will never go away but it'll never be my cup of tea. 
> > 
> > --
> > Best CMS Solution of 2017!
> > http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_f8h9lv_-OPEN-WEBCAM---START-RECORD--
> > Jonas Eklundh
> 
> 
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
>     -----
>     Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
>     -----
> No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
>     -----
>     Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
>     -----    
> No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
> By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
>     -----
>     I didn't write that.
>     -----
> Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE. 
> 
> Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
> 
> Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days. 
> 
> So already Carroll's story is unlikely. 
> 
> But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in. 
> 
> But Carroll could not leave his story there.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
>     -----
>     Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being,
>     don't trust anything from it.
>     -----
> Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*. 
> 
> This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable. 
> 
> Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!
> 
> He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
>     -----
>     Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account
>     so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
>     anything that's coming from it was written by me.
>     -----
> He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
>     -----
>     Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
>     I may have to kill the account.
>     -----
> What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
> 
> Just nonsense.
> 
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
>     -----
>     Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
>     point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
>     -----
> But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
>     -----
>     They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
>     didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
>     hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
>     -----
> So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.
> 
> Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
>     -----
>     There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
>     issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
>     -----
> Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist. 
> 
> The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back). 
> 
> My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)
> 
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
>     -----
>     The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
>     this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
>     one standing for some odd reason. 
>     -----
> Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
> 
> I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.
> 
> Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
> 
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
>     -----
>     And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
>     their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
>     password protected ;)
>     -----
> Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.
> 
> Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely? Why has he not said anything about this? 
> 
> My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it. 
> 
> This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
> 
> Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
>     -----
>     The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
>     a feeble password on this account.
>     -----
> Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.
> 
> His story changes with the telling.
> 
> But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently tried it with me.
> 
> Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
>     -----
>     The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
>     Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
>     it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
>     account. 
>     -----
> Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.
> 
> He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
>     -----
>     That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years, 
>     feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
>     info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
>     this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
>     to be ;)
>     -----
> I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for certain? 
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
>     -----
>     Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
>     proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
>     charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
>     for now.
> 
>     Do not think this is over.
>     -----
>     
> No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies. 
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
>     -----
>     I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
>     and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
>     your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
>     at Yavapai College contacts you.
> 
>     Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
>     incest.
> 
>     See if those can not be quoted.
>     -----
>     
> Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
>     -----
>     You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
>     years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
>     was over a line.
>     -----
>     
> A complete and utter lie from Carroll. 
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
>     -----
>     The above post is Snit hacking my account.
>     -----
> A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
>     -----
>     You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
>     anything from my fretwizzer account now that Snit and ebot have
>     access to it.
>     -----
> More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
> 
> Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
>     -----
>     Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
>     account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
>     of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
>     say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
>     have never used.
>     -----
>     
> No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.
> 
> --
> This Trick Gets Women Hot For You
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfhq6/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than/
> https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519
> Jonas Eklundh Communication AB



No-one gets it, I don't get it. 

vallor is just thrilled that Snit is on the other end. Imagine if vallor walked up to a chimpanzee and delivered the punch line. It wouldn't be worth it. Who are you even talking to? The guy is as well liked as pork pie in a mosque -- and with good reason. Idiot. 

-- 
This broke the Internet
https://youtu.be/r7wys2JvBD0
http://www.5z8.info/facebook-of-sex_w4l4wg_bomb
http://www.5z8.info/mydick_x6g9hr_nakedgrandmas.jpg
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452634 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 12:43:48 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 8:38:09 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 8:07:23 PM UTC-7, Bricked wrote:
> > > On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> > > >> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> > > >>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> > > >>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> > > >>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> > > >>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The Washington Post says:
> > > >>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> > > >>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> > > >>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> > > >>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> > > >>>>>    with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> > > >>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> > > >>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> > > >>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
> > > >> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
> > > >> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
> > > >> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
> > > >> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
> > > >> rarelly one can sepparate.
> > > >> 
> > > >but they all drive cadillacs
> > > 
> > > I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Michael Glasser Snit created at least 20 virtual systems in the last year or so. I am sure he and the herd are proud. It's Peter the Klöwn's problem but he blames Michael Glasser Snit. Obviously he would rather blame others than face reality. Being open source as it is, bulletin boards will never go away but it'll never be my cup of tea. 
> > 
> > --
> > Best CMS Solution of 2017!
> > http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_f8h9lv_-OPEN-WEBCAM---START-RECORD--
> > Jonas Eklundh
> 
> 
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
>     -----
>     Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
>     -----
> No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
>     -----
>     Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
>     -----    
> No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
> By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
>     -----
>     I didn't write that.
>     -----
> Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE. 
> 
> Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
> 
> Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days. 
> 
> So already Carroll's story is unlikely. 
> 
> But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in. 
> 
> But Carroll could not leave his story there.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
>     -----
>     Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being,
>     don't trust anything from it.
>     -----
> Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*. 
> 
> This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable. 
> 
> Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!
> 
> He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
>     -----
>     Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account
>     so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
>     anything that's coming from it was written by me.
>     -----
> He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.
> 
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
>     -----
>     Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
>     I may have to kill the account.
>     -----
> What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
> 
> Just nonsense.
> 
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
>     -----
>     Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
>     point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
>     -----
> But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
>     -----
>     They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
>     didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
>     hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
>     -----
> So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.
> 
> Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
>     -----
>     There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
>     issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
>     -----
> Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist. 
> 
> The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back). 
> 
> My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)
> 
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
>     -----
>     The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
>     this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
>     one standing for some odd reason. 
>     -----
> Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
> 
> I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.
> 
> Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
> 
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
>     -----
>     And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
>     their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
>     password protected ;)
>     -----
> Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.
> 
> Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely? Why has he not said anything about this? 
> 
> My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it. 
> 
> This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
> 
> Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
>     -----
>     The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
>     a feeble password on this account.
>     -----
> Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.
> 
> His story changes with the telling.
> 
> But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently tried it with me.
> 
> Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
>     -----
>     The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
>     Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
>     it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
>     account. 
>     -----
> Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.
> 
> He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
>     -----
>     That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years, 
>     feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
>     info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
>     this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
>     to be ;)
>     -----
> I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for certain? 
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
>     -----
>     Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
>     proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
>     charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
>     for now.
> 
>     Do not think this is over.
>     -----
>     
> No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies. 
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
>     -----
>     I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
>     and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
>     your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
>     at Yavapai College contacts you.
> 
>     Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
>     incest.
> 
>     See if those can not be quoted.
>     -----
>     
> Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
>     -----
>     You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
>     years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
>     was over a line.
>     -----
>     
> A complete and utter lie from Carroll. 
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
>     -----
>     The above post is Snit hacking my account.
>     -----
> A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
> 
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
>     -----
>     You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
>     anything from my fretwizzer account now that Snit and ebot have
>     access to it.
>     -----
> More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
> 
> Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
>     -----
>     Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
>     account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
>     of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
>     say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
>     have never used.
>     -----
>     
> No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.
> 
> --
> This Trick Gets Women Hot For You
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfhq6/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than/
> https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519
> Jonas Eklundh Communication AB



Really, what lie? 

I quoted specific examples of Larry Washington twisting Steve Carroll's words, holding me accountable for the actions of others, etc. His response: to claim I am Larry Washington. And you do realize that it isn't impossible for Larry Washington to be doing this, or working with one of his old students who knows what they are doing. 

--
This broke the Internet
https://youtu.be/IhOfBmWwCVY
https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452561 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On 5/26/2018 11:07 PM, Bricked wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>>>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>>>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>>>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Washington Post says:
>>>>>>     one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>>>>>>     12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>>>>>>     Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>>>>>>     more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>>>>>>     with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>>>
>>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>>>
>>>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
>>>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
>>>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
>>> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
>>> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
>>> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
>>> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
>>> rarelly one can sepparate.
>>>
>> but they all drive cadillacs
> 
> I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.
> 
Hey Nads! This is not one of your bullshit socialist countries.
THIS IS AMERICA! I don't think three cars is too many!

(I used to drive 4 but now I've only got 2)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452628 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 9:11:56 AM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 5/26/2018 11:07 PM, Bricked wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> >>> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> >>>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> >>>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> >>>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> >>>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Washington Post says:
> >>>>>>     one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> >>>>>>     12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> >>>>>>     Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> >>>>>>     more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> >>>>>>     with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> >>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> >>>>
> >>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> >>>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> >>>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
> >>> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
> >>> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
> >>> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
> >>> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
> >>> rarelly one can sepparate.
> >>>
> >> but they all drive cadillacs
> > 
> > I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.
> > 
> Hey Nads! This is not one of your bullshit socialist countries.
> THIS IS AMERICA! I don't think three cars is too many!
> 
> (I used to drive 4 but now I've only got 2)



Gee, imagine Doomsdrzej trying to pin his codswallop on Troll Killer Snit and me, no one has ever seen that before < @_@ >. Pay for a background investigation on Doomsdrzej and you will learn that he was in a detention center last year. Anyone know what for? The sites fail to go into that amount of specificity and public records from his jurisdiction are private unless subpoenaed. Troll Killer Snit conned Doomsdrzej as much as he deserves, big deal. Doomsdrzej is being a wailing prick about it? 

His hope is to see me frustrated by nonstop flooding. And hey, that could or could not... you know what I mean. 

-- 
Top Ten Ways Doomsdrzej Trolls!
http://www.5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_g0w7hf_molotovcocktail
http://www.5z8.info/add-worm_z4r9qk_fakelogin
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452621 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 8:07:23 PM UTC-7, Bricked wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> >> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> >>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> >>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> >>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> >>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Washington Post says:
> >>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> >>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> >>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> >>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> >>>>>    with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> >>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> >>>
> >>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> >>>
> >>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> >>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> >>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
> >> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
> >> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
> >> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
> >> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
> >> rarelly one can sepparate.
> >> 
> >but they all drive cadillacs
> 
> I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


- --
sex n 
1. either of the two reproductive categories, male or female, of animals  and plants 
2. sexual intercourse 
3. sexual activity or behavior leading to it 
4. the genitals (literary) 
5. the set of characteristics that determine whether the reproductive role of an animal or plant is male or female 
- --

And, notably, Snit wrote:
"Sex is a subset of sexual activities" - Snit - (I guess he didn't comprehend point 3 very well) 

Of course, he also wrote:
"Sexual activities are sex by definition, you moron" - Snit 

And this:
"A passionate kiss could be called a "sexual activity" but it is not sex" 

In Snit's world, a passionate kiss is not sex... but it is sex. LOL!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=4yFU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Live on Kickstarter
https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/BVpdH5KOc6s
https://youtu.be/BUjnZhKk1Bg 
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452529 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 7:04:54 PM UTC-7, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> > Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> >> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> >> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> >> > oddly, she's off the radar.
> >> > 
> >> > The Washington Post says:
> >> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> >> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> >> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> >> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> >> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> >> 
> >> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> >> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> >
> > Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> >
> > Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> > however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> > Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
> rarelly one can sepparate.
> 
> -- 
> press any key to continue or any other to quit...



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

One thing that I have never seen spoofed is the Google acct. number so perhaps you can use it as a filtering criteria, too. Here's mine:

posting-account=qzPusQoAAADVdKNEKE-jqIVbecHp7oZ7 

My gmail posts go back to 2009 (that I've seen, crackhead's forgeries using gmail only go back to 2012). Notice the posting acct. number on this response matches this post from 2009:

<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/C9FwjiytRoA/ftc2GG7-37AJ>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=sC4v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Live on Kickstarter!
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfkup/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than/=
http://www.macadvocacy.pw/2005/Nov/09/236626.html
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web