Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #285967 > unrolled thread

GNOME 3.16 Released!

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-25 19:01 +0100
    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 15:51 -0400
      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-25 15:03 -0500
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 17:15 -0400
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 22:01 +0000
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:53 -0600
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:11 +0100
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:54 -0600
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:01 +0100
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:21 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-26 11:56 -0500
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:13 -0600
      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-25 23:54 +0100
    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-25 16:01 -0400
      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-25 16:37 -0400
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 17:27 -0400
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:56 -0600
      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 17:15 -0400
      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:09 +0100
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:18 -0400
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:24 +0100
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:30 -0400
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:58 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:02 +0100
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:19 -0600
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:15 -0400
      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 19:55 -0600
    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 17:00 -0400
      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 17:32 -0400
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 22:43 +0100
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 21:56 +0000
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 23:09 +0100
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:23 +0000
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:31 +0100
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:36 +0000
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:39 -0400
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:02 -0600
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:12 -0400
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 23:22 +0100
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:36 -0400
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:15 +0000
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:04 -0400
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:04 -0600
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:08 -0400
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 23:14 +0100
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:30 -0400
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-25 23:35 +0100
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 18:40 -0400
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:20 +0000
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:10 -0600
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:24 +0100
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:25 +0000
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:10 -0600
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:27 -0400
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:38 +0100
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 04:30 +0000
                            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 09:02 -0400
                          Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-28 16:29 -0700
                            Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:37 -0400
                              Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-28 18:51 -0700
                                Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-28 22:09 -0400
                                  Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 09:33 -0400
                                    Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 09:58 -0400
                                Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 22:38 -0400
                                Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 06:56 -0400
                                  Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 13:11 +0000
                                  Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 16:18 -0600
                                    Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 18:50 -0400
                                      Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:40 -0600
                              For Linux-hating trolls: bite a little harder, why don't you? (was Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-31 15:41 -0700
                            Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-28 19:48 -0400
                              Re: Windows games, sound routing, and all that jazzercize DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:24 -0400
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:10 -0500
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 13:22 +0100
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 09:28 -0400
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:12 -0600
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-26 12:07 -0500
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:30 -0400
                            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 23:09 +0100
                              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 20:43 -0400
                                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-26 19:18 -0600
                                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 22:29 -0400
                              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-26 19:16 -0600
                            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 19:11 -0700
                            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 10:55 -0400
                              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 11:52 -0400
                                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 13:06 -0400
                                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 14:20 -0400
                                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-28 19:21 -0600
                              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-28 17:11 +0100
                                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-28 17:22 +0100
                                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-28 11:15 -0600
                                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 14:15 -0400
                                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 14:13 -0400
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-26 19:14 -0600
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:58 -0400
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:12 -0600
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:50 -0400
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:18 -0600
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:10 -0600
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:23 +0100
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:15 -0600
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 05:57 -0400
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:13 -0400
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:13 -0600
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:40 -0400
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-25 19:25 -0500
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 20:42 -0400
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:16 -0600
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:16 -0600
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:09 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:19 +0000
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:25 +0100
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:07 -0600
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:15 +0100
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:14 -0400
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:18 -0600
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:14 -0500
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:11 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:17 -0600
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:27 +0100
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-25 23:12 -0600
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-26 12:00 -0500
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:10 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-26 09:24 +0000
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 06:10 -0400
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 11:40 +0100
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 09:09 -0400
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 14:41 +0100
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-26 12:06 -0500
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 20:12 +0100
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 14:44 -0500
                            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 22:07 +0100
                              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:54 -0400
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:09 -0600
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:19 -0400
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:08 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:08 -0600
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-25 19:22 -0700
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:58 -0400
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 08:41 -0700
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:25 -0400
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 19:17 -0700
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:01 -0400
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:19 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 03:32 +0100
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 04:30 +0000
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 21:35 -0700
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 10:53 +0100
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:59 +0000
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:34 -0500
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 09:29 -0400
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:06 -0600
                            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-26 21:42 +0000
                              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-27 13:53 -0600
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:06 -0600
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-26 08:58 -0400
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 09:07 -0400
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:05 -0600
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:59 -0400
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 06:03 -0400
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-26 06:00 -0400
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:04 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:52 -0400
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:32 -0400
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-25 23:26 -0400
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:00 -0600
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:19 -0500
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-26 09:14 -0400
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 14:38 +0100
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 08:57 -0500
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-26 11:14 -0400
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-26 16:35 +0100
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 11:08 -0500
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:04 -0600
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:49 -0400
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 14:03 -0600
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-27 08:20 -0400
                        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 09:24 -0400
                          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-27 13:51 -0600
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 12:55 -0400
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 10:49 -0500
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 11:33 -0500
                      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 13:59 -0600
                    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:27 -0400
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 10:09 -0400
                  Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 13:59 -0600
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-26 13:58 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 10:05 -0400
                Why quote @chrisv ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-03-26 19:27 -0700
      Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:13 +0100
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:13 +0000
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:20 -0400
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-26 00:35 +0100
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:49 -0400
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:22 -0400
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:22 -0600
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 07:26 -0500
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:21 -0600
        Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-25 20:17 -0400
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-03-25 20:22 -0600
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-25 22:59 -0400
              Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:32 -0400
                Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-26 17:16 -0400
          Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-25 23:32 -0400
            Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:47 -0400
    Re: GNOME 3.16 Released! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 18:49 -0700

Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11  Next page →

#286250

"DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in message news:mf17n7$mjg$5@dont-email.me...
> On 3/26/2015 9:57 AM, chrisv wrote:
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>
>>> DumFSck wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "(chrisv) claims (Relf's) code is shitty. Let's see him substantiate
>>>>> it with some facts and a code analysis."  -  trolling fsckwit
>>>>> "Ezekiel"
>>>>
>>>> And you ran away like the pissant you are.
>>>>

>
>>> There is no need to explain why Relfs code is the shittiest on earth. 
>>> Just a
>>> cursory glance at it is enough to know it
>>
>> Exactly.  Only a trolling fsckwit, like "Ezekiel", would have even
>> asked.  Where would one even start?
>
> Bad formatting, no comments and no white space (Relf's signature code 
> attributes) doesn't necessarily make the code bad, just hard to read. You 
> didn't know why the Relf code was bogus, so you slinked away like the 
> usual chickenshit you are.
>

Turdv decided that even though he has zero understanding of the code - he 
can call it the shittiest that he's ever seen because it's just intuitively 
obvious to anyone who looks at it.

" *even someone who has never programmed* " would automatically be able to 
know what's good code and what isn't. It's no different than seeing a 
gymnast fall off a balance beam.

<quote>
Hey, Kook, does one need to be a gymnast, to recognize that someone is a 
complete klutz that can't even stand on the balance beam?

You are *ignorant* of the Relf code, *obviously*, or you would not be making 
such a fricken *jackass* of yourself, as if it's not obvious to *even 
someone who has never programmed* that the Relf code is garbage!
</quote>


I never realized that programming in C/C++ was that obvious and intuitive 
where people who know nothing about programming can just look at some code 
and immediately be able to judge the quality.

So when grandma or anyone see's something like this - the quality of which 
one is better is just obvious:

       while ((*src++ = *dst++) != '\0');

        while (*src++ = *dst++);

-- 
This reminds me of a Relf classic.

    "Testing is how you know
     if the  code works or not,
     not compile-time warnings."
     -  Jeff Relf

Heh.  One doesn't need to be a pro, to know how stupid that is...


New thread from chrisv displaying his software expertise
June 13, 2014
<d6plp958n3o545aqg62banloa9sip3ds6n@4ax.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286240

chrisv wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>
>>There is no need to explain why Relfs code is the shittiest on earth. Just a 
>>cursory glance at it is enough to know it
>
>Exactly.  Only a trolling fsckwit, like "Ezekiel", would have even
>asked.  Where would one even start?

I should have also noted that Kreep *lied* to attack me, claiming that
I had not even seen the code.

"chrisv is so unreasonable that he'll call code shitty, without ever
seeing it."  (That's me paraphrasing, trolls, not directly quoting the
Kreep.)

I mean, WTF?  In order to attack their superiors, these fsckers will
make-up shit that they cannot *possibly* know!

-- 
"Given that (chrisv) hasn't seen the code"  -  Ezekreep, lying
shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286247

chrisv wrote:

>chrisv wrote:
>>
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>There is no need to explain why Relfs code is the shittiest on earth. Just a 
>>>cursory glance at it is enough to know it
>>
>>Exactly.  Only a trolling fsckwit, like "Ezekiel", would have even
>>asked.  Where would one even start?
>
>I should have also noted that Kreep *lied* to attack me, claiming that
>I had not even seen the code.
>
>"chrisv is so unreasonable that he'll call code shitty, without ever
>seeing it."  (That's me paraphrasing, trolls, not directly quoting the
>Kreep.)
>
>I mean, WTF?  In order to attack their superiors, these fsckers will
>make-up shit that they cannot *possibly* know!

Of course, the filthy lying hypocrite Ezekreep will *not* ridicule his
shitty pal Dumfsck for comparing the quality of Gates' code to "most
everyone's" OSS code, without seeing either one!

-- 
"Gates was into software since he was 13 years old, and he's far and
away a better software developer than most everyone in OSS la-la
land."  -  DumFSck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286271

chrisv wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
> 
>>chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>There is no need to explain why Relfs code is the shittiest on earth.
>>>>Just a cursory glance at it is enough to know it
>>>
>>>Exactly.  Only a trolling fsckwit, like "Ezekiel", would have even
>>>asked.  Where would one even start?
>>
>>I should have also noted that Kreep *lied* to attack me, claiming that
>>I had not even seen the code.
>>
>>"chrisv is so unreasonable that he'll call code shitty, without ever
>>seeing it."  (That's me paraphrasing, trolls, not directly quoting the
>>Kreep.)
>>
>>I mean, WTF?  In order to attack their superiors, these fsckers will
>>make-up shit that they cannot *possibly* know!
> 
> Of course, the filthy lying hypocrite Ezekreep will *not* ridicule his
> shitty pal Dumfsck for comparing the quality of Gates' code to "most
> everyone's" OSS code, without seeing either one!
> 
BWAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!  Turdv is talking to himself again.
Put the crack pipe down.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286299

On 2015-03-26 11:49 AM, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
>
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>> There is no need to explain why Relfs code is the shittiest on earth. Just a
>>> cursory glance at it is enough to know it
>>
>> Exactly.  Only a trolling fsckwit, like "Ezekiel", would have even
>> asked.  Where would one even start?
>
> I should have also noted that Kreep *lied* to attack me, claiming that
> I had not even seen the code.
>
> "chrisv is so unreasonable that he'll call code shitty, without ever
> seeing it."  (That's me paraphrasing, trolls, not directly quoting the
> Kreep.)
>
> I mean, WTF?  In order to attack their superiors, these fsckers will
> make-up shit that they cannot *possibly* know!

Those *fsckwits*.

Seriously though, chrisv, you're one of the biggest losers in here. 
Something tells me that you were a Goth in high school and that you have 
a very rad mustache and mullet in the 1980s.

-- 
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286221

"Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message 
news:mf1227$ua4$1@dont-email.me...
> DFS wrote:
>
>> On 3/26/2015 8:19 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>> --
>>> "(chrisv) claims (Relf's) code is shitty. Let's see him substantiate
>>> it with some facts and a code analysis."  -  trolling fsckwit
>>> "Ezekiel"
>>
>>
>> And you ran away like the pissant you are.
>>
>> You couldn't say why Relf's code was shitty, so you skedaddled.
>
> There is no need to explain why Relfs code is the shittiest on earth. Just 
> a
> cursory glance at it is enough to know it

If turdv had any clue at all about programming (which he doesn't) then it 
would have been trivial to name any of the dozens of things wrong with 
Relf's mess.

The fact is that he kept screaming how shitty the code is but was incapable 
of naming even one single thing that was shitty about it. No matter how easy 
that was to do.

-- 
This reminds me of a Relf classic.

    "Testing is how you know
     if the  code works or not,
     not compile-time warnings."
     -  Jeff Relf

Heh.  One doesn't need to be a pro, to know how stupid that is...


New thread from chrisv displaying his ignorance
June 13, 2014
<d6plp958n3o545aqg62banloa9sip3ds6n@4ax.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286270

Ezekiel wrote:

> 
> "Peter K�hlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message
> news:mf1227$ua4$1@dont-email.me...
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/26/2015 8:19 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>>> --
>>>> "(chrisv) claims (Relf's) code is shitty. Let's see him substantiate
>>>> it with some facts and a code analysis."  -  trolling fsckwit
>>>> "Ezekiel"
>>>
>>>
>>> And you ran away like the pissant you are.
>>>
>>> You couldn't say why Relf's code was shitty, so you skedaddled.
>>
>> There is no need to explain why Relfs code is the shittiest on earth.
>> Just a
>> cursory glance at it is enough to know it
> 
> If turdv had any clue at all about programming (which he doesn't) then it
> would have been trivial to name any of the dozens of things wrong with
> Relf's mess.
> 
> The fact is that he kept screaming how shitty the code is but was
> incapable of naming even one single thing that was shitty about it. No
> matter how easy that was to do.
> 
Notice the koldturd can't provide any pointers on Relf's code.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286269

Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> DFS wrote:
> 
>> On 3/26/2015 8:19 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>> --
>>> "(chrisv) claims (Relf's) code is shitty. Let's see him substantiate
>>> it with some facts and a code analysis."  -  trolling fsckwit
>>> "Ezekiel"
>> 
>> 
>> And you ran away like the pissant you are.
>> 
>> You couldn't say why Relf's code was shitty, so you skedaddled.
> 
> There is no need to explain why Relfs code is the shittiest on earth. Just
> a cursory glance at it is enough to know it

Yeah, like phonies like you would know.
Guffaw!!!

The rest of the people here just give you curses.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286220

"DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in message news:mf10lq$n4l$1@dont-email.me...
> On 3/26/2015 8:19 AM, chrisv wrote:
>> --
>> "(chrisv) claims (Relf's) code is shitty. Let's see him substantiate
>> it with some facts and a code analysis."  -  trolling fsckwit
>> "Ezekiel"
>
>
> And you ran away like the pissant you are.
>
> You couldn't say why Relf's code was shitty, so you skedaddled.

His argument was basically that it's shitty because other advocates said so 
and he wanted to jump on the bandwagon. He had no clue at all why it was 
shitty. It was just a bunch of mindless "me too" posts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286328 — Why quote @chrisv ? !

<PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A !important;'><big><big> 
Why quote @chrisv ? !   At best, he's a clown.

Only I know what X.EXE does; I'm the sole user, 
I haven't tested it on other people's machines.
It requires Windows 8.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286040

On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:00:54 -0400
"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:

> 
> "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message 
> news:20150325190117.6ff30af2@maxa-pc...
> >" The GNOME project has released GNOME 3.16, the latest version of
> >GNOME
> > 3. The new version is the result of six months work, and includes
> > 33,525 changes by 1043 authors."
> >
> > Yeeeeey!
> >
> >
> > https://www.gnome.org/news/2015/03/gnome-3-16-released-2/
> >
> >
> 
> <quote>
> History
> 
> GNOME was started in August 1997 by Miguel de Icaza and Federico Mena
> as a free software project to develop a desktop environment and
> applications for it
> </quote>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME
> 
> 
> Miguel was speaking his mind once and said something that wasn't
> flattering about Linux.  So posers like Ahlstrom who have never
> contributed anything to free software now consider him a traitor.
> 

Miguel is pushing .NET , no wonder...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286041

On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:13:05 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:00:54 -0400 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>> "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message
>> news:20150325190117.6ff30af2@maxa-pc...
>> >" The GNOME project has released GNOME 3.16, the latest version of
>> >GNOME
>> > 3. The new version is the result of six months work, and includes
>> > 33,525 changes by 1043 authors."
>> >
>> > Yeeeeey!
>> >
>> >
>> > https://www.gnome.org/news/2015/03/gnome-3-16-released-2/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> <quote>
>> History
>> 
>> GNOME was started in August 1997 by Miguel de Icaza and Federico Mena
>> as a free software project to develop a desktop environment and
>> applications for it </quote>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME
>> 
>> 
>> Miguel was speaking his mind once and said something that wasn't
>> flattering about Linux.  So posers like Ahlstrom who have never
>> contributed anything to free software now consider him a traitor.
>> 
>> 
> Miguel is pushing .NET , no wonder...

Exactly.

-- 
When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
                           it'll be a vacuum cleaner

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286045

"Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message 
news:20150326001305.1e4f669c@maxa-pc...
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:00:54 -0400
> "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message
>> news:20150325190117.6ff30af2@maxa-pc...
>> >" The GNOME project has released GNOME 3.16, the latest version of
>> >GNOME
>> > 3. The new version is the result of six months work, and includes
>> > 33,525 changes by 1043 authors."
>> >
>> > Yeeeeey!
>> >
>> >
>> > https://www.gnome.org/news/2015/03/gnome-3-16-released-2/
>> >
>> >
>>
>> <quote>
>> History
>>
>> GNOME was started in August 1997 by Miguel de Icaza and Federico Mena
>> as a free software project to develop a desktop environment and
>> applications for it
>> </quote>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME
>>
>>
>> Miguel was speaking his mind once and said something that wasn't
>> flattering about Linux.  So posers like Ahlstrom who have never
>> contributed anything to free software now consider him a traitor.
>>
>
> Miguel is pushing .NET , no wonder...
>

What direction he chooses to pursue doesn't change the contributions that 
he's already made.

There's nothing inherently wrong with .NET either. If Redhat or Google had 
developed it instead of Microsoft most of the advocates here would be 
drooling over it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286056

On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:20:39 -0400
"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:

> 
> "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message 
> news:20150326001305.1e4f669c@maxa-pc...
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:00:54 -0400
> > "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message
> >> news:20150325190117.6ff30af2@maxa-pc...
> >> >" The GNOME project has released GNOME 3.16, the latest version of
> >> >GNOME
> >> > 3. The new version is the result of six months work, and includes
> >> > 33,525 changes by 1043 authors."
> >> >
> >> > Yeeeeey!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > https://www.gnome.org/news/2015/03/gnome-3-16-released-2/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> <quote>
> >> History
> >>
> >> GNOME was started in August 1997 by Miguel de Icaza and Federico
> >> Mena as a free software project to develop a desktop environment
> >> and applications for it
> >> </quote>
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME
> >>
> >>
> >> Miguel was speaking his mind once and said something that wasn't
> >> flattering about Linux.  So posers like Ahlstrom who have never
> >> contributed anything to free software now consider him a traitor.
> >>
> >
> > Miguel is pushing .NET , no wonder...
> >
> 
> What direction he chooses to pursue doesn't change the contributions
> that he's already made.

He didn't abandoned, Linux, that is. He spoke against it and supposedly
moved to OS X...

> 
> There's nothing inherently wrong with .NET either. If Redhat or
> Google had developed it instead of Microsoft most of the advocates
> here would be drooling over it.

Microsoft sees market opportunities in server side .NET for Linux...
C# or Java, same to me ...
Problem is that client side differs and Microsoft is not allowing that
for Linux, only server side....
Therefore there are few popular C# client apps on Linux...

> 
> 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286059

"Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message 
news:20150326003524.3f75bacf@maxa-pc...
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:20:39 -0400
> "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message
>> news:20150326001305.1e4f669c@maxa-pc...
>> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:00:54 -0400
>> > "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:20150325190117.6ff30af2@maxa-pc...
>> >> >" The GNOME project has released GNOME 3.16, the latest version of
>> >> >GNOME
>> >> > 3. The new version is the result of six months work, and includes
>> >> > 33,525 changes by 1043 authors."
>> >> >
>> >> > Yeeeeey!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://www.gnome.org/news/2015/03/gnome-3-16-released-2/
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> <quote>
>> >> History
>> >>
>> >> GNOME was started in August 1997 by Miguel de Icaza and Federico
>> >> Mena as a free software project to develop a desktop environment
>> >> and applications for it
>> >> </quote>
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Miguel was speaking his mind once and said something that wasn't
>> >> flattering about Linux.  So posers like Ahlstrom who have never
>> >> contributed anything to free software now consider him a traitor.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Miguel is pushing .NET , no wonder...
>> >
>>
>> What direction he chooses to pursue doesn't change the contributions
>> that he's already made.
>
> He didn't abandoned, Linux, that is. He spoke against it and supposedly
> moved to OS X...

And one day he may move to a different OS. It's that "choice" thing that 
he's freely using.

>>
>> There's nothing inherently wrong with .NET either. If Redhat or
>> Google had developed it instead of Microsoft most of the advocates
>> here would be drooling over it.
>
> Microsoft sees market opportunities in server side .NET for Linux...
> C# or Java, same to me ...
> Problem is that client side differs and Microsoft is not allowing that
> for Linux, only server side....
> Therefore there are few popular C# client apps on Linux...

The problem is that Java had a huge head start and is firmly entrenched on 
servers. It's difficult to unseat Java.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286068

Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:20:39 -0400
> "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
>
>> There's nothing inherently wrong with .NET either. If Redhat or
>> Google had developed it instead of Microsoft most of the advocates
>> here would be drooling over it.

You mean, just like "we" drooled over systemd from RedHat?  Just like "we"
drooled over Google splitting their browser into Chromium and Chrome?  Just
like "we" drooled over Canonical bringing out a dumbed-down desktop
environment with very few configuration options?

Zeke should speak for himself, not "we".

> Microsoft sees market opportunities in server side .NET for Linux...
> C# or Java, same to me ...
> Problem is that client side differs and Microsoft is not allowing that
> for Linux, only server side....
> Therefore there are few popular C# client apps on Linux...

"How many .NET Framework versions do *you* want to install today?"

-- 
Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286110

On 03/25/15 18:22, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:20:39 -0400
>> "Ezekiel"<zeke@nosuchemail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> There's nothing inherently wrong with .NET either. If Redhat or
>>> Google had developed it instead of Microsoft most of the advocates
>>> here would be drooling over it.
>
> You mean, just like "we" drooled over systemd from RedHat?  Just like "we"
> drooled over Google splitting their browser into Chromium and Chrome?  Just
> like "we" drooled over Canonical bringing out a dumbed-down desktop
> environment with very few configuration options?
>
> Zeke should speak for himself, not "we".
>
>> Microsoft sees market opportunities in server side .NET for Linux...
>> C# or Java, same to me ...
>> Problem is that client side differs and Microsoft is not allowing that
>> for Linux, only server side....
>> Therefore there are few popular C# client apps on Linux...
>
> "How many .NET Framework versions do *you* want to install today?"
>
You guys are always drooling.  Reminds me of an idiot.


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286196

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>> Kreep wrote:
>>>
>>> There's nothing inherently wrong with .NET either. If Redhat or
>>> Google had developed it instead of Microsoft most of the advocates
>>> here would be drooling over it.
>
>You mean, just like "we" drooled over systemd from RedHat?  Just like "we"
>drooled over Google splitting their browser into Chromium and Chrome?  Just
>like "we" drooled over Canonical bringing out a dumbed-down desktop
>environment with very few configuration options?
>
>Zeke should speak for himself, not "we".

Kreep is liar.  This isn't the first time that he's insinuated that
advocates are "hypocrites" based-upon his complete assholish
conjecture.

-- 
"Linux is a complete copycat OS."  -  trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286109

On 03/25/15 17:35, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:20:39 -0400
> "Ezekiel"<zeke@nosuchemail.com>  wrote:
>
>>
>> "Melzzzzz"<mel@zzzzz.com>  wrote in message
>> news:20150326001305.1e4f669c@maxa-pc...
>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:00:54 -0400
>>> "Ezekiel"<zeke@nosuchemail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Melzzzzz"<mel@zzzzz.com>  wrote in message
>>>> news:20150325190117.6ff30af2@maxa-pc...
>>>>> " The GNOME project has released GNOME 3.16, the latest version of
>>>>> GNOME
>>>>> 3. The new version is the result of six months work, and includes
>>>>> 33,525 changes by 1043 authors."
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeeeeey!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.gnome.org/news/2015/03/gnome-3-16-released-2/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <quote>
>>>> History
>>>>
>>>> GNOME was started in August 1997 by Miguel de Icaza and Federico
>>>> Mena as a free software project to develop a desktop environment
>>>> and applications for it
>>>> </quote>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Miguel was speaking his mind once and said something that wasn't
>>>> flattering about Linux.  So posers like Ahlstrom who have never
>>>> contributed anything to free software now consider him a traitor.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Miguel is pushing .NET , no wonder...
>>>
>>
>> What direction he chooses to pursue doesn't change the contributions
>> that he's already made.
>
> He didn't abandoned, Linux, that is. He spoke against it and supposedly
> moved to OS X...
>

And a smart move too. That's where the money is at.

>>
>> There's nothing inherently wrong with .NET either. If Redhat or
>> Google had developed it instead of Microsoft most of the advocates
>> here would be drooling over it.
>
> Microsoft sees market opportunities in server side .NET for Linux...
> C# or Java, same to me ...
> Problem is that client side differs and Microsoft is not allowing that
> for Linux, only server side....
> Therefore there are few popular C# client apps on Linux...
>

Who cares.  Linux is dying a slow death.

-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286067

Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:00:54 -0400
> "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Miguel was speaking his mind once and said something that wasn't
>> flattering about Linux.  So posers like Ahlstrom who have never
>> contributed anything to free software now consider him a traitor.

Apparently Zeke is unable to find my small projects on the web.

> Miguel is pushing .NET , no wonder...

-- 
Tele-Parabilizing:
	Morals used in everyday life that derive from TV sitcom plots:
"That's just like the episode where Jan loses her glasses!"
		-- Douglas Coupland, "Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated
		   Culture"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web