Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #485936 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-25 03:21 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-25 22:16 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 165 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: Satan's Playground — New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 03:21 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:03 -0600
Expecting to get facts from a fruit is pure insanity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 05:24 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 13:33 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 09:19 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-25 15:27 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 16:18 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:15 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 13:59 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:02 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 14:18 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:39 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 15:10 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:23 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 16:22 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 07:19 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-26 17:36 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 07:22 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 14:45 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:14 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:56 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:02 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 16:13 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:19 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 16:00 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-31 07:05 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:18 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:24 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 16:01 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:27 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:34 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:59 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:25 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:56 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:23 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:23 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:21 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:53 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-31 07:20 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 16:22 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:20 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:07 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-26 21:51 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 07:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 10:06 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:10 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 16:17 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:33 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:12 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 16:44 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:17 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 08:11 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:04 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 16:42 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 21:50 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:29 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-26 22:03 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 04:13 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 05:49 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 07:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 09:40 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 09:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 10:27 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-27 18:43 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 15:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 16:45 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 04:33 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:17 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 10:05 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 12:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 18:21 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 20:00 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 03:32 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-29 08:41 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 08:14 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 09:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 10:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 20:25 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 07:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 11:04 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 05:19 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 06:50 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 06:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 08:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 10:39 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 11:33 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 11:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 12:23 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 12:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-31 21:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 13:20 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-31 21:47 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 22:48 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 06:52 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 07:25 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 11:08 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:36 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:50 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 13:24 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:15 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:52 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:27 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:28 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-01 20:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:31 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 13:28 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 13:56 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-01 22:04 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 14:27 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Tommy B <riceornice8p@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 23:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 15:15 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 21:48 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 07:42 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-04 07:11 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York flyer <snowflyer09o@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 13:53 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 04:49 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 05:22 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 16:06 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 08:29 -0800
You can't forge the "Path:" line. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:51 -0800
Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:57 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:21 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 12:08 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 00:20 -0600
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 22:49 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 23:52 -0800
ProtonMail. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-04 23:05 -0800
Re: PutinMail. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-05 01:07 -0600
Re: ProtonMail. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 23:21 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 12:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 12:39 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 20:58 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 14:12 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 14:29 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:46 +0000
Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:45 -0800
Re: Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 19:02 +0000
You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 11:06 -0800
Re: You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 19:08 +0000
_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 11:28 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 00:29 -0600
_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-04 22:58 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 14:11 -0600
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-05 13:16 -0500
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-05 13:59 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-05 17:31 -0500
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2019-02-05 22:47 +0000
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-05 14:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 12:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 17:48 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-31 22:32 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 12:16 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-27 23:39 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 07:18 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:31 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:26 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 14:09 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:16 +0000
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
| From | flyer <snowflyer09o@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-04 13:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <q39g4u$1u19$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #486640 |
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 07:11:03 -0600, chrisv wrote: > Tommy B wrote: > >> (snip) > > -highhorse is an asshole, no doubt, but the claimed opinion of a > spineless nym-shifter, like you, means nothing at all. It meant enough to you or you wouldn't have replied. Have you figured out how to install Linux yet? Maybe hh can assist you. X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 04:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <cf3f8996-941a-4666-98ce-9a1a911e88e7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486390 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 5:04:19 PM UTC-5, owl wrote: > -hh wrote: > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > >> owl wrote: > >> > >> > -hh wrote: > >> >> > >> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a > >> >> bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination > >> >> to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability > >> >> requirements have been defined and analyzed. > >> > > >> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > >> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! > >> > >> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. > > > > Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a > > DARPA IP Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. > > > > Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove > > that I am me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even > > if it was as a janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment > > than that which owl, Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P > > > > Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). > All their base are belong to us. Not really, as that's a self-configurable line, not an ISP injected one. Being that you've now as much just admitted to have falsified it, it doesn't prove that others have done the same. Particularly since I've never claimed to have falsified headers, nor done so. Granted, I was accused of it by Peter K a few years ago, but he was debunked w/local site photo. Now for the challenge of it, let's see if you can actually replicate with faked IP the details of my post in question. This requires you to at least successfully spoof all the headers of a GG post on a mobile device, including fooling Google's injected address part. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 05:22 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <74522f44-e66e-4ba0-be35-f7f4adc5d50d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486441 |
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 5:49:58 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 5:04:19 PM UTC-5, owl wrote: > > -hh wrote: > > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > > >> owl wrote: > > >> > > >> > -hh wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a > > >> >> bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination > > >> >> to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability > > >> >> requirements have been defined and analyzed. > > >> > > > >> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > > >> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! > > >> > > >> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. > > > > > > Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a > > > DARPA IP Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. > > > > > > Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove > > > that I am me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even > > > if it was as a janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment > > > than that which owl, Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P > > > > > > > Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). > > All their base are belong to us. > > Not really, as that's a self-configurable line, not an ISP injected one. Being that > you've now as much just admitted to have falsified it, it doesn't prove that others > have done the same. Particularly since I've never claimed to have falsified headers, > nor done so. Granted, I was accused of it by Peter K a few years ago, but he was > debunked w/local site photo. > > Now for the challenge of it, let's see if you can actually replicate with faked IP > the details of my post in question. This requires you to at least successfully spoof > all the headers of a GG post on a mobile device, including fooling Google's injected > address part. > > > -hh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Snit! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYY/GZAAoJELnOYK54exUCoY8P/A2to3G0OJrV4rFZqrfos0G+ Hlz52idYDsiO9KbYI9E2AaEhX5Jado6kJgDD31LTOnYSHrIuTi/LeywcjOL/FCy7 bEojPW3xtu/XWHHSKU1Grce80Q2PHuR+878JDbCjXgrFplNEVk8+kiv2+5RlYegG 7xEgm+/J8zvxVlPfyoHOO65AygYy/ykShdza+MAW6OFWaXFNOxExjRx3mCmWcu3b eyf0bxgzL4zAFCuPBAOXQ56vxO8AOuwk8F7mXLV2Vn2Q2OTcqrEYMjwQZ2q7wFSg khU6VkEs7aFJ6keLSCoZlFmnoymptflJw3h0O6bb9GK67JBV6Moh5rev6aJfqGuZ fo38FgD/eRVroAYSm3FSCcknNbUhdNLUO/JmCRtx62YQvZoyUqUL64YRGlJ+moAV ZnU6NfI4WeeQ5nuagTS+kKjj1qGxsUkXEUTFRJpv4zQcHnTKTyUl+38t3+Jke7ua NRtkWtIvgg9+JCsA1qHjDDP29hdR5v7KFFnRKBaVgV+/nrALANWybFJKYsqxpP95 LMd0pxvEy2ZlX9n3nkmMIn4iRX3dY795NgOzHGd1ZWtMS3BPu4QWFA/YS7Adb30Z yHClb/JJWGtTPvgVtPzHyNbPhF6+kgJ/KQ6YrqiX71ZNLZNqCze7z3nw6xjcWr9V soXbWlBBa6AX7lnolpK8 =hcV2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - Best CMS Solution of 2017 http://www.5z8.info/-php-deactivate_phishing_filter-48-_e3m8dt_malicious-cookie Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 16:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <p4j8z00g3a.ga3h934@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #486441 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 5:04:19 PM UTC-5, owl wrote: >> -hh wrote: >> > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: >> >> owl wrote: >> >> >> >> > -hh wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a >> >> >> bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination >> >> >> to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability >> >> >> requirements have been defined and analyzed. >> >> > >> >> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. >> >> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! >> >> >> >> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. >> > >> > Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a >> > DARPA IP Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. >> > >> > Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove >> > that I am me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even >> > if it was as a janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment >> > than that which owl, Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P >> > >> >> Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). >> All their base are belong to us. > > Not really, as that's a self-configurable line, not an ISP injected one. Being that > you've now as much just admitted to have falsified it, it doesn't prove that others > have done the same. Particularly since I've never claimed to have falsified headers, > nor done so. Granted, I was accused of it by Peter K a few years ago, but he was > debunked w/local site photo. > Why would you have claimed to falsify your headers when pretending to be someone else? Doesn't that defeat the purpose? > Now for the challenge of it, let's see if you can actually replicate with faked IP > the details of my post in question. This requires you to at least successfully spoof > all the headers of a GG post on a mobile device, including fooling Google's injected > address part. > > > -hh What's the message-id of that post? Here's spoofing Injection-Info and NNTP-Posting-Host of your current post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 08:29 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <45e7e537-74df-45ea-8b08-8c6415ed06cf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486451 |
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 9:06:49 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 5:04:19 PM UTC-5, owl wrote: > >> -hh wrote: > >> > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > >> >> owl wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > -hh wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a > >> >> >> bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination > >> >> >> to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability > >> >> >> requirements have been defined and analyzed. > >> >> > > >> >> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > >> >> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! > >> >> > >> >> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. > >> > > >> > Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a > >> > DARPA IP Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. > >> > > >> > Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove > >> > that I am me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even > >> > if it was as a janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment > >> > than that which owl, Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P > >> > > >> > >> Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). > >> All their base are belong to us. > > > > Not really, as that's a self-configurable line, not an ISP injected one. Being that > > you've now as much just admitted to have falsified it, it doesn't prove that others > > have done the same. Particularly since I've never claimed to have falsified headers, > > nor done so. Granted, I was accused of it by Peter K a few years ago, but he was > > debunked w/local site photo. > > > > Why would you have claimed to falsify your headers when pretending to > be someone else? Doesn't that defeat the purpose? > > > > Now for the challenge of it, let's see if you can actually replicate with faked IP > > the details of my post in question. This requires you to at least successfully spoof > > all the headers of a GG post on a mobile device, including fooling Google's injected > > address part. > > > > > > -hh > > What's the message-id of that post? > Here's spoofing Injection-Info and NNTP-Posting-Host of your current post. I'm getting more posts hidden then show. I'm guessing the Klaus Schadenfreude whackadoodle is in its brain damage mode again. It is utter bliss to not read that crap. Like most everyone else in here, Klaus Schadenfreude relies on false news to form positions on the news. As a result, he only is aware of and listens to the endorsed reports which also happens to be the ones which describe communists in an extremely kind and respectable way. Time to blame the cult-like herd of convenient friends! -- My Snoring Solution https://youtu.be/Z5wo5aE7MUk Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 10:51 -0800 |
| Subject | You can't forge the "Path:" line. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.2--10.51am.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #486451 |
Owl:
> spoofing Injection-Info and NNTP-Posting-Host
You can't forge the "Path:" line.
Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress.
Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you !
For that, use a binary server; to wit:
News.US.Usenet-News.NET:119 or usNews.BlockNews.NET:119
They won't censor you; they don't even keep the "Path:" line,
so you can't be identified. Their archive is over 15 years deep.
$5 buys you 11 gigs, enough for several life times.
If one is down ( -very- unlikely ), use the other one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 10:57 -0800 |
| Subject | Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.2--10.57am.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #486464 |
Sam Wormley replied:
> > Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you !
> > For that, use a binary server; to wit:
>
> Who will ban whom ?
The answer is very complex, I don't have the time for it now;
Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned.
Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ),
Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet.
For that, use INN servers; to wit:
News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
News.Individual.NET:119
"Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year.
"OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ).
Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register
Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 11:21 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. |
| Message-ID | <63fa8455-a962-49b0-b6e5-cf5ac06d12ef@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486465 |
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:57:57 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Sam Wormley replied: > > > Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you ! > > > For that, use a binary server; to wit: > > > > Who will ban whom ? > > The answer is very complex, I don't have the time for it now; > Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. > > Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ), > Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet. > For that, use INN servers; to wit: > > News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > News.Individual.NET:119 > > "Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year. > "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ). > Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register > Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh. Do you have a CCNA certification? Seriously, what lie? But Just Wondering feels the need to attack the cult-like herd of convenient friends. I just use score: -9999 and won't be bothered by the flooding. Just Wondering's nonsense has made a full-out disaster of usenet via GG, so I don't make an attempt replying to the group with my client anymore. One thing he has done with this crap is that the Just Wondering filter has been shown to be the right choice. Seriously, those of you who troll are not able to manage yourselves anymore. Windows Mobile, runs on the C+ kernel. So yeah, C+ is mobile. C+ is a super computer. C+ is a server. C+ is a desktop. C+ is growing in market share. -- Top Six Ways Just Wondering Trolls! http://www.5z8.info/creditscore_g7f8du_launchexe Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 12:08 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. |
| Message-ID | <8291a873-9ef4-47a3-a7fb-1e8c3b820b86@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486471 |
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 12:21:29 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:57:57 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > Sam Wormley replied:
> > > > Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you !
> > > > For that, use a binary server; to wit:
> > >
> > > Who will ban whom ?
> >
> > The answer is very complex, I don't have the time for it now;
> > Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned.
> >
> > Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ),
> > Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet.
> > For that, use INN servers; to wit:
> >
> > News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
> > News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
> > News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
> > News.Individual.NET:119
> >
> > "Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year.
> > "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ).
> > Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register
> > Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh.
>
>
>
> Do you have a CCNA certification? Seriously, what lie? But Just Wondering feels the need to attack the cult-like herd of convenient friends.
>
> I just use score: -9999 and won't be bothered by the flooding. Just Wondering's nonsense has made a full-out disaster of usenet via GG, so I don't make an attempt replying to the group with my client anymore. One thing he has done with this crap is that the Just Wondering filter has been shown to be the right choice. Seriously, those of you who troll are not able to manage yourselves anymore. Windows Mobile, runs on the C+ kernel. So yeah, C+ is mobile. C+ is a super computer. C+ is a server. C+ is a desktop. C+ is growing in market share.
>
>
>
> --
> Top Six Ways Just Wondering Trolls!
> http://www.5z8.info/creditscore_g7f8du_launchexe
> Jonas Eklundh
In fact HWSNBN's lies were quoted time and time again. So obviously I regret sending hardware to HWSNBN. While I am sure his shills appreciated it, he has taught me to never try to appease a troll.
I thought showing HWSNBN I know where he lives might help the situation. It did not.
At one point, HWSNBN said a COLA denizen was "obsessing" over him, which was defined as replying to his posts. HWSNBN can't get anything else to work, either. You wishing for something does not make it true. Being open source as it is, low-level programming will never go away but it'll never be my cup of tea. Just some names Carroll has used
"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo
--
Do not click this link!!!
http://prescottcomputerguy.com/screenflow
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-05 00:20 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. |
| Message-ID | <q3b9vq$1uoi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #486465 |
On 2/2/2019 12:57 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Sam Wormley replied: >>> Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you ! >>> For that, use a binary server; to wit: >> >> Who will ban whom ? > > The answer is very complex, I don't have the time for it now; > Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. > > Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ), > Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet. > For that, use INN servers; to wit: > > News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > News.Individual.NET:119 > > "Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year. > "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ). > Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register > Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh. > thanks! thoughts on protonmail ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-04 22:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. |
| Message-ID | <bf17b4be-f673-4493-a1d8-24133ef08029@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486759 |
On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 11:20:45 PM UTC-7, Serg Io wrote:
> On 2/2/2019 12:57 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> > Sam Wormley replied:
> >>> Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you !
> >>> For that, use a binary server; to wit:
> >>
> >> Who will ban whom ?
> >
> > The answer is very complex, I don't have the time for it now;
> > Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned.
> >
> > Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ),
> > Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet.
> > For that, use INN servers; to wit:
> >
> > News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
> > News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
> > News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
> > News.Individual.NET:119
> >
> > "Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year.
> > "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ).
> > Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register
> > Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh.
> >
>
>
> thanks!
>
> thoughts on protonmail ?
Marek admitted Carroll repeatedly asked him to lie:
Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
When I first tried to broker peace between you [Steve Carroll] and
Snit, you emailed me over and over again asking be to lie about
Glasser.
-----
And then Marek later admitted he DOES lie, but claimed he does it simply because it pleases him to do so:
Marek <keCdnc7hoMqpfy3EnZ2dnUU7-YHNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
| Why do you post your attacks and insults and lies if not to please
| the herd?
I do it to please me, Snit.
-----
Whatever his reason for lying, even Marek admits he lies and attacks and insults.
--
This broke the Internet!
http://www.5z8.info/open.exe_f2s2ea_nazi
http://www.5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_g0w7hf_molotovcocktail
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-04 23:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. |
| Message-ID | <5530b1f7-3815-4203-855b-e424b67a2e59@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486762 |
On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 11:49:49 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 11:20:45 PM UTC-7, Serg Io wrote: > > On 2/2/2019 12:57 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > > > Sam Wormley replied: > > >>> Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you ! > > >>> For that, use a binary server; to wit: > > >> > > >> Who will ban whom ? > > > > > > The answer is very complex, I don't have the time for it now; > > > Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. > > > > > > Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ), > > > Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet. > > > For that, use INN servers; to wit: > > > > > > News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > > > News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > > > News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > > > News.Individual.NET:119 > > > > > > "Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year. > > > "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ). > > > Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register > > > Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh. > > > > > > > > > thanks! > > > > thoughts on protonmail ? > > > > Marek admitted Carroll repeatedly asked him to lie: > > Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>: > ----- > When I first tried to broker peace between you [Steve Carroll] and > Snit, you emailed me over and over again asking be to lie about > Glasser. > ----- > > And then Marek later admitted he DOES lie, but claimed he does it simply because it pleases him to do so: > > Marek <keCdnc7hoMqpfy3EnZ2dnUU7-YHNnZ2d@giganews.com>: > ----- > | Why do you post your attacks and insults and lies if not to please > | the herd? > > I do it to please me, Snit. > ----- > > Whatever his reason for lying, even Marek admits he lies and attacks and insults. > > -- > This broke the Internet! > http://www.5z8.info/open.exe_f2s2ea_nazi > http://www.5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_g0w7hf_molotovcocktail > Jonas Eklundh Communication AB -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 - -- sex n 1. either of the two reproductive categories, male or female, of animals and plants 2. sexual intercourse 3. sexual activity or behavior leading to it 4. the genitals (literary) 5. the set of characteristics that determine whether the reproductive role of an animal or plant is male or female - -- And, notably, Snit wrote: "Sex is a subset of sexual activities" - Snit - (I guess he didn't comprehend point 3 very well) Of course, he also wrote: "Sexual activities are sex by definition, you moron" - Snit And this: "A passionate kiss could be called a "sexual activity" but it is not sex" In Snit's world, a passionate kiss is not sex... but it is sex. LOL! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVRYvKAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dgbUP/icm7kQOjm2kSNou+JmBBgHb A4tmqQKGn3RwkS88wbmhuGrc7bj+Mn0olYmozNufRMG1hB+cjJR/a3K4qEN+hZP7 6KNdfvYKxSOcdtrsYEezCOPK6yu9tlwspR5w61vMaEWxmGX8CZ8FuZWnZhiul1CA WXRpPDK8GJnWecK7wqDw8wJCKu4ENRw0AUTFWdmmGIUO1n3x/NSbCXIftMop4MBd 9NHP3v26pA5NB9tlh//BtQa8Ys03DASuViFd1VRgtuL4wSnctDDLUE4zQGp+GcS7 DOhjROy9ExDGqer4uLwPwDD59eUef8s4WI/XRivl2uQSl7rs/XWKw4OStOzXajGX EMcJ4c9zPjtwKB2F781+U3DH2l9YLBii/UZCpgcblvvuXSb/b/7D64AxpzvEfPpZ TTq/OcOEDsbhaOijEdELMw/IjuQ+Pp+5cMEOey7BK3uPAjr8gOLU0xmChJimNP8r o9RzphsO8O+mJMK0sdke9FEJByCgX3LbJYro21v0ZS0Nt2JW16Z8VakHNKfUbuLg IYHbShHiEQ1GCWOQ+AIfpwG6td/NE/EhiCE9OixWAsvGq6e0w4k7vARG8hSfZDpp 3hp7rD8x9EVp4v4e7G34Wr6FIZlfYzD2fX6SRu9wYpG/v87sgvrN9klY1YLn/zig oZmOKJM5cC0iwnvHsavO =4yFU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Do not click this link! https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 http://alt.conspiracy.narkive.com/QcWYJ4Px/the-mentally-ill-mark-s-bilk https://youtu.be/r7wys2JvBD0 Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-04 23:05 -0800 |
| Subject | ProtonMail. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.4--11.05pm.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #486759 |
Serg_Io asked me: > thoughts on ProtonMail ? It's NonStandard. Security by obscurity. WikiPedia.ORG says: In July 2018, ProtonMail reported it was under renewed DDoS attacks, with CEO Andy Yen stating that the attackers had been paid by an unknown party to launch the attacks. In September 2018, one of the suspected ProtonMail attackers was arrested by British law enforcement and charged in connection with a series of other high-profile cyberattacks against schools and airlines.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-05 01:07 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: PutinMail. |
| Message-ID | <Dsmdnd7zW86zq8TBnZ2dnUU7-UnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #486765 |
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:05:51 -0800 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD; Jeff-Relf.Me @. determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.4--11.05pm.Seattle.2019>: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Serg_Io asked me: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ thoughts on ProtonMail ? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ It's NonStandard. Security by obscurity. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ WikiPedia.ORG says: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ In July 2018, ProtonMail reported it was under renewed DDoS attacks, ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ with CEO Andy Yen stating that the attackers had been paid by an ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ unknown party to launch the attacks. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ In September 2018, one of the suspected ProtonMail attackers was ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ arrested by British law enforcement and charged in connection with a ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ series of other high-profile cyberattacks against schools and ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ airlines. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ sounds like a good idea -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-04 23:21 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: ProtonMail. |
| Message-ID | <370cb539-84bb-4194-8952-132c3ca210bb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486765 |
On Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 12:05:54 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Serg_Io asked me:
> > thoughts on ProtonMail ?
>
> It's NonStandard. Security by obscurity.
>
> WikiPedia.ORG says:
>
> In July 2018, ProtonMail reported it was under
> renewed DDoS attacks, with CEO Andy Yen stating that
> the attackers had been paid by an unknown party to
> launch the attacks.
>
> In September 2018, one of the suspected ProtonMail attackers
> was arrested by British law enforcement and charged
> in connection with a series of other high-profile cyberattacks
> against schools and airlines.
Troll Killer Snit:
-----
I would love to see the group become that! I would love to see
people, for example, pick tasks they do with Desktop Linux which
they believe are handled better than the competition. I have
encouraged that for a long time. But so far few if any such tasks
have been shown.
-----
Marek Novotny:
-----
Linux is a Server, A Cloud, A service, A mobile Platform, A
developers dream come true, A super cluster, a Main frame and a
DESKTOP. It's not JUST a desktop. You're a two-bit bullshit coward
who refuses to face what Linux actually is. It's too much for you,
obviously.
-----
Troll Killer Snit (referencing to the above quote):
----
But it is not all of those things. Not even close. It is USED by
those things but it is NOT those things.
-----
Marek Novotny (some time later):
-----
Android isn't Linux. Android makes "use" of the Linux kernel.
Android is indeed open source, but it is not community driven open
source. Those that know the difference likely won't cry over Android
ditching the Linux kernel and adopting their own kernel. It simply
never mattered for all the reasons I stated above. Now the fact that
I have to articulate this in writing so these clueless tards like
DFS and Troll Killer Snit can gain some insights because they LACK their
own insights is what I find troubling. They both have no business
arguing in here. They are simply too stupid to have a conversation
about that which they just don't fundamentally understand in the
first place.
-----
Notice Marek uses the concepts I taught him (about how Linux is "USED" by the things he listed) then fantasizes about how I did not know the information HE got wrong and I corrected him with (and did so with no name calling or insults).
Rudy Canoza:
-----
I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I and if that wasn't enough, I,I,I,I,I,I.
Talk about a narcissistic fool.
-----
Troll Killer Snit:
-----
You left out his I, I, I, I. AM. BETTER. THAN. Troll Killer Snit AND DFS!
He is clearly feeling very insecure these days.
-----
Marek Novotny:
-----
Well, if he wants to play this game with me he'll find pictures of
his wife on imgur with dildos all over her and I can cross post
those too. Keep fucking around Troll Killer Snit. I can play this game too.
-----
-
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 12:16 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <2fea9c56-5d4b-4392-a7b4-48016b67f24c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486451 |
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:06:49 AM UTC-5, owl wrote: > -hh wrote: > > ... > > > > Not really, as that's a self-configurable line, not an ISP injected one. Being that > > you've now as much just admitted to have falsified it, it doesn't prove that others > > have done the same. Particularly since I've never claimed to have falsified headers, > > nor done so. Granted, I was accused of it by Peter K a few years ago, but he was > > debunked w/local site photo. > > > Why would you have claimed to falsify your headers when pretending to > be someone else? Doesn't that defeat the purpose? One wouldn't, and precisely correct, but that's besides the point as I've not claimed to be pretending to be me. Others have made that insinuation under the rationale that it would possible to do that via falsifying X, Y & Z, even though they've not proven that X, Y & Z have in fact actually happened. > > Now for the challenge of it, let's see if you can actually replicate with faked IP > > the details of my post in question. This requires you to at least successfully spoof > > all the headers of a GG post on a mobile device, including fooling Google's injected > > address part. > > What's the message-id of that post? Looks like its: <b2b77025-20af-43db-9ffc-86f026293e27@googlegroups.com> > Here's spoofing Injection-Info and NNTP-Posting-Host of your current post. Which contains: Message-ID: <p4j8z00g3a.ga3h934@rooftop.invalid> Which isn't GG, so there's still work to do to make it a successful fake. BTW, I see that Jeff is telling you that there's fields which GG doesn't let you to alter, which apparently prevents certain kinds of forgeries. I don't know, but my perspective is that I've been posting from GG for years & years, so your forgery demonstration would also need to include it appearing to come from GG as the host platform in a convincing fashion. Good luck...but do keep in mind that all that this can prove is that this is within the realm of the possible, not that it was in actuality ever herein employed...that's a whole separate proof to work on. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 12:39 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <579f6adf-9724-4083-852f-1a83d77c319b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486476 |
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 1:16:39 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:06:49 AM UTC-5, owl wrote: > > -hh wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > Not really, as that's a self-configurable line, not an ISP injected one. Being that > > > you've now as much just admitted to have falsified it, it doesn't prove that others > > > have done the same. Particularly since I've never claimed to have falsified headers, > > > nor done so. Granted, I was accused of it by Peter K a few years ago, but he was > > > debunked w/local site photo. > > > > > > Why would you have claimed to falsify your headers when pretending to > > be someone else? Doesn't that defeat the purpose? > > One wouldn't, and precisely correct, but that's besides the point as I've not claimed > to be pretending to be me. Others have made that insinuation under the rationale that > it would possible to do that via falsifying X, Y & Z, even though they've not proven > that X, Y & Z have in fact actually happened. > > > > > Now for the challenge of it, let's see if you can actually replicate with faked IP > > > the details of my post in question. This requires you to at least successfully spoof > > > all the headers of a GG post on a mobile device, including fooling Google's injected > > > address part. > > > > What's the message-id of that post? > > Looks like its: <b2b77025-20af-43db-9ffc-86f026293e27@googlegroups.com> > > > > Here's spoofing Injection-Info and NNTP-Posting-Host of your current post. > > Which contains: > Message-ID: <p4j8z00g3a.ga3h934@rooftop.invalid> > Which isn't GG, so there's still work to do to make it a successful fake. > > BTW, I see that Jeff is telling you that there's fields which GG doesn't let you to > alter, which apparently prevents certain kinds of forgeries. I don't know, but my > perspective is that I've been posting from GG for years & years, so your forgery > demonstration would also need to include it appearing to come from GG as the > host platform in a convincing fashion. Good luck...but do keep in mind that all > that this can prove is that this is within the realm of the possible, not that it was > in actuality ever herein employed...that's a whole separate proof to work on. > > > -hh Is this for real? No one here has ever read my script, much less found a bug; still, in the dark recesses of my brain, I'm thinking, "Did I do all the error checking I could". I am more honest with myself than Melzzzz is. But why the added need to debug JavaScript via ODBC connectivity in an embedded system? Predictably, he didn't state this as part of his, what would undoubtedly be, ever increasing 'test' <whatever>. Frankly I do not really give a shit. I just set a kill filter and won't be bothered by the flooding. Melzzzz's crap has made an out and out cesspool of usenet via Google Groups, so I don't even bother reading the group with my tablet anymore. A good thing he has done with this flooding is that the Melzzzz ban is now permanent. Who are you even blubbering to? -- This broke the Internet http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_f8h9lv_-OPEN-WEBCAM---START-RECORD-- Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 20:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <8z0xfb8083tgaw.ga38@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #486476 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:06:49 AM UTC-5, owl wrote: > >> Here's spoofing Injection-Info and NNTP-Posting-Host of your current post. > > Which contains: > Message-ID: <p4j8z00g3a.ga3h934@rooftop.invalid> > Which isn't GG, so there's still work to do to make it a successful fake. > LOL! Seriously? Message-ID? > BTW, I see that Jeff is telling you that there's fields which GG doesn't let you to > alter, which apparently prevents certain kinds of forgeries. Which is irrelevant. A post need not actually originate from GG in order to appear to have done so. The only header difficulty is Path, but the ability to preload Path is matter a policy of a particular server. Given a server with loose policy wrt Path (or if you control the server), it would be easy to make a very convincing forgery. > I don't know, but my > perspective is that I've been posting from GG for years & years, so your forgery > demonstration would also need to include it appearing to come from GG as the > host platform in a convincing fashion. Good luck...but do keep in mind that all > that this can prove is that this is within the realm of the possible, not that it was > in actuality ever herein employed...that's a whole separate proof to work on. > All that is required to deny use of usenet headers as "proof of identity" or "proof of origin" is to show that they can be spoofed. Done. Maybe that's why my bank's online security tests don't just ask for a link to a cola post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 14:12 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <20df0086-fcef-4f32-a024-30f390b6c88d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486479 |
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 3:58:11 PM UTC-5, owl wrote: > -hh wrote: > > On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:06:49 AM UTC-5, owl wrote: > > > > >> Here's spoofing Injection-Info and NNTP-Posting-Host of your current post. > > > > Which contains: > > Message-ID: <p4j8z00g3a.ga3h934@rooftop.invalid> > > Which isn't GG, so there's still work to do to make it a successful fake. > > LOL! Seriously? Message-ID? Well, if you're going to make a convincing forgery, why wouldn't you cover all the fields? > > BTW, I see that Jeff is telling you that there's fields which GG doesn't let > > you to alter, which apparently prevents certain kinds of forgeries. > > > Which is irrelevant. A post need not actually originate from GG in order > to appear to have done so. Sure, but that doesn't mean that you've actually done so. > The only header difficulty is Path, but > the ability to preload Path is matter a policy of a particular server. > Given a server with loose policy wrt Path (or if you control the server), > it would be easy to make a very convincing forgery. Which IIRC you said 'can be done', but you chose not to violate your Server's TOS in order to show it being done. A related question that I'd have is if the Path is static or dynamic in nature, because if its the latter, it presumably would be harder to keep maintained. > > I don't know, but my > > perspective is that I've been posting from GG for years & years, so your forgery > > demonstration would also need to include it appearing to come from GG as the > > host platform in a convincing fashion. Good luck...but do keep in mind that all > > that this can prove is that this is within the realm of the possible, not that it was > > in actuality ever herein employed...that's a whole separate proof to work on. > > > All that is required to deny use of usenet headers as "proof of identity" > or "proof of origin" is to show that they can be spoofed. Done. Maybe > that's why my bank's online security tests don't just ask for a link to > a cola post. This has from the start been a bottomless rabbit hole stemming from how someone didn't like what I was saying, instead doing a vague hand-wave of some unidentified authority who's never been quoted or identified. hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 14:29 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <932da953-b6ca-4539-94b5-1c92342a3c76@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486482 |
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 3:12:53 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 3:58:11 PM UTC-5, owl wrote: > > -hh wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:06:49 AM UTC-5, owl wrote: > > > > > > > >> Here's spoofing Injection-Info and NNTP-Posting-Host of your current post. > > > > > > Which contains: > > > Message-ID: <p4j8z00g3a.ga3h934@rooftop.invalid> > > > Which isn't GG, so there's still work to do to make it a successful fake. > > > > LOL! Seriously? Message-ID? > > Well, if you're going to make a convincing forgery, why wouldn't you > cover all the fields? > > > > BTW, I see that Jeff is telling you that there's fields which GG doesn't let > > > you to alter, which apparently prevents certain kinds of forgeries. > > > > > > Which is irrelevant. A post need not actually originate from GG in order > > to appear to have done so. > > Sure, but that doesn't mean that you've actually done so. > > > The only header difficulty is Path, but > > the ability to preload Path is matter a policy of a particular server. > > Given a server with loose policy wrt Path (or if you control the server), > > it would be easy to make a very convincing forgery. > > Which IIRC you said 'can be done', but you chose not to violate your > Server's TOS in order to show it being done. A related question that > I'd have is if the Path is static or dynamic in nature, because if its the > latter, it presumably would be harder to keep maintained. > > > > > I don't know, but my > > > perspective is that I've been posting from GG for years & years, so your forgery > > > demonstration would also need to include it appearing to come from GG as the > > > host platform in a convincing fashion. Good luck...but do keep in mind that all > > > that this can prove is that this is within the realm of the possible, not that it was > > > in actuality ever herein employed...that's a whole separate proof to work on. > > > > > > All that is required to deny use of usenet headers as "proof of identity" > > or "proof of origin" is to show that they can be spoofed. Done. Maybe > > that's why my bank's online security tests don't just ask for a link to > > a cola post. > > This has from the start been a bottomless rabbit hole stemming from how > someone didn't like what I was saying, instead doing a vague hand-wave > of some unidentified authority who's never been quoted or identified. > > > hh The guy is as popular as a fart in a spacesuit -- and with good cause. I think Rudy Canoza does not even know what is wrong with the MSM. The one thing Rudy Canoza learned well is to attempt to shame Jonas Eklundh into back peddling and if that fails to work, drown him out with flooding or subtly change the target. The advocates insist asking for guidance for a Linux application is instigating. Don't look now, but I think Rudy Canoza has a serious fascination with Jonas Eklundh. -- E-commerce Simplified!! http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_j6f7mm_gruesome-gunshot-wounds https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4 https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web