Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #486886 > unrolled thread

Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund?

Started byvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
First post2019-02-06 22:16 +0000
Last post2019-02-12 09:26 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 117 — 25 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-06 22:16 +0000
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-06 15:03 -0800
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 07:40 -0600
      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-08 14:49 +0000
        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 10:28 -0500
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 17:56 +0000
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 13:19 -0500
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 13:32 -0500
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 12:35 -0600
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:23 +0000
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 13:00 -0600
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-09 03:21 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:55 -0500
                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:29 +0000
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:54 -0500
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:34 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2019-02-09 20:23 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:34 -0500
                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:06 +0000
                    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-03-14 04:39 +0000
                      When I see "malware", the phrase "clueless idiot" pops into my head. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-03-13 21:49 -0700
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2019-02-09 20:22 -0800
                Please kill yourself on the way out of the door Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:46 -0800
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 15:02 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-02-10 21:32 +0000
                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 21:48 +0000
                    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:04 +0000
                      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:15 +0000
                        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:23 +0000
                          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:37 +0000
                            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:39 +0000
                              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:50 +0000
                                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 00:29 +0000
                                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:01 +0000
                                    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 10:24 +0100
                                      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 03:44 -0800
                                        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 13:26 +0100
                                          To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-11 04:46 -0800
                                            Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-11 10:41 -0500
                                              Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 09:57 -0600
                                              Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 10:29 -0600
                                                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 10:38 -0600
                                                  Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 11:08 -0600
                                                    Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-02-11 13:22 -0500
                                                      Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 12:56 -0600
                                                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 16:44 +0000
                                              Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 09:11 -0800
                                                Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 12:59 -0600
                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-11 12:10 -0700
                                                    Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 13:20 -0600
                                                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 12:22 -0700
                                                        Re: Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 14:51 -0600
                                                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:55 -0700
                                                            Re: Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 14:59 -0600
                                                  Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:35 -0600
                                                    Re: Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-12 10:56 -0600
                                                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-12 11:12 -0600
                                            Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 09:41 -0600
                                              Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:47 -0500
                                                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 13:04 -0800
                                                  Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:39 -0600
                                            Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 17:56 +0000
                                            Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 13:03 -0800
                                              Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:53 -0600
                                              To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-11 13:57 -0800
                                                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 15:03 -0700
                                                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 22:03 +0000
                                                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 17:07 -0600
                                                  Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:38 -0800
                                                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 17:14 -0500
                                          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:10 -0800
                                            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 16:38 +0100
                                              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 10:39 -0800
                                              *You* can't, I can. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-11 14:00 -0800
                                        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:50 +0000
                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:36 -0500
                    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:12 +0000
                      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-03-14 19:05 -0400
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:11 -0600
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:35 -0800
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 18:53 +0000
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 14:26 -0500
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 19:59 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-09 03:26 +0000
                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 19:00 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:59 -0500
                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-09 19:58 -0800
                    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:17 -0600
                      Signatures are for posts with ZERO informational content Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 05:27 -0800
                        Re: Signatures are for posts with ZERO informational content chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:33 -0600
                          A person could actually grow old waiting to be enlighten on COLA about Linux. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 05:36 -0800
                            Re: A person could actually grow old waiting to be enlighten on COLA about Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 13:52 -0500
                      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:12 -0800
                        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 08:33 -0600
                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 12:23 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 21:54 -0500
                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-02-10 14:16 +0000
                    Russell's shitty attitude is the PROBLEM, rather than the solution Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 06:29 -0800
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:36 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 22:03 -0500
                  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 14:52 +0000
                    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 13:14 -0500
                      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 18:18 +0000
                    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2019-02-23 14:59 +0000
    There is stupid, then there is vallor stupid Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 05:25 -0800
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:48 -0500
      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:40 +0000
        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:31 -0500
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:05 +0000
      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 21:47 -0500
      The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:51 -0800
        Re: The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 08:13 -0500
          Time to drop a MOAB on COLA Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 04:52 -0800
          Re: The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2019-02-16 02:41 +0000
      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 14:47 -0500
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 14:49 -0500
      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-12 09:26 +0000

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

#488526 — When I see "malware", the phrase "clueless idiot" pops into my head.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2019-03-13 21:49 -0700
SubjectWhen I see "malware", the phrase "clueless idiot" pops into my head.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.13--9.49pm.Seattle.2019>
In reply to#488524
RonB wrote:
> on Windows, malware is not a niche product.

When I see "malware", the phrase "clueless idiot" pops into my head.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487052

Fromtom <tom@0.0.0.0>
Date2019-02-09 20:22 -0800
Message-ID<20190209202216.4eab1b83@viridi>
In reply to#487030
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 18:54:04 -0500
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:

> Indeed.
> 
> If your Corp forces you to use Windows, what choice do you have?
> Find a company that allows you to use Linux?  How do you figure that
> out before you apply?
That's actually one of the questions I ask during the interview, Would
I be allowed to run a UNIX clone, such as Linux or OpenBSD on my
workstation?

-- 
 _______________________________________ 
/ I know things about TROY DONAHUE that \
\ can't even be PRINTED!!               /
 --------------------------------------- 
\
 \
   /\   /\   
  //\\_//\\     ____
  \_     _/    /   /
   / * * \    /^^^]
   \_\O/_/    [   ]
    /   \_    [   /
    \     \_  /  /
     [ [ /  \/ _/
    _[ [ \  /_/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487057 — Please kill yourself on the way out of the door

FromSimon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
Date2019-02-10 02:46 -0800
SubjectPlease kill yourself on the way out of the door
Message-ID<5285a854-cc2c-4999-b728-716616984abc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#487052
On Saturday, February 9, 2019 at 11:22:23 PM UTC-5, tom wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 18:54:04 -0500
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> 
> > Indeed.
> > 
> > If your Corp forces you to use Windows, what choice do you have?
> > Find a company that allows you to use Linux?  How do you figure that
> > out before you apply?
> That's actually one of the questions I ask during the interview, Would
> I be allowed to run a UNIX clone, such as Linux or OpenBSD on my
> workstation?



Hello, Mental Moron.

Goodbye, tom.  Please kill yourself on the way out of the door.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487075

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2019-02-10 15:02 -0500
Message-ID<1r%7E.15458$Sw5.1283@fx06.iad>
In reply to#487030
On 2/9/2019 6:54 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> F. Russell wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:28:16 -0500, DFS vomited this verbiage that I
>> considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible
>> reasons:
>>
>>> What makes them hypocrites is making a living with Windows by day, but
>>> sliming onto cola at night and lying about and insulting MS and Windows.
>>
>> What a pathetically lame and irrational idiot!
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> If your Corp forces you to use Windows, what choice do you have?
> Find a company that allows you to use Linux?  How do you figure that out
> before you apply?

Seriously?  You look for a job as a Linux developer or network admin or 
DBA, etc.

duh Creepy.


> Windows is basically locked in at most companies.  A sad fact, but true.

What's sad about it?  Corporations are run by pragmatic people, and 
Windows is the only realistic desktop to deploy in a company.



> However, one can still use Linux in a VM, or in the Linux subsystem of
> Windows (will DFS ever call Microsoft "hypocrites" for supporting it?  

Why should I - Microsoft hearts Linux, remember?

https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/windowsserver/2015/05/06/microsoft-loves-linux/



> Of course not!  He's an asshole, bent as a boomerang!) 

Pipe down, pipsqueak.



> Or even use something
> like Git Bash, MSYS2, or a virtual machine.

So are you a victim of the Windows patriarchy or not?




> Of course, your Corp may have complete say-so over that, and prevent you
> from running anything not allowed by the corporate crapware.

Good.  When you run your own company you can let your employees go hog 
wild on their computers.


> Powerbroker, anyone?

All your desktop are belong to us.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487076

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2019-02-10 21:32 +0000
Message-ID<q3q59d0oq2@news4.newsguy.com>
In reply to#487075
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 15:02:41 -0500, DFS wrote:

> 
> Corporations are run by pragmatic people, and 
> Windows is the only realistic desktop to deploy in a company.
> 

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Corporations are run by ignorant idiots
that have never even HEARD of GNU/Linux.

These profound dummies know only one thing: Microshit Winblows.
Then they hire a staff of IT idiots who know only one thing:
Microshit Winblows.

That's how it's been seen the first IBM PCs made their way
into the first corp offices and that's how it will be far
into the future.  Microshit is kept alive by brain-dead imbeciles.

Those people are so fucking stupid that the sudden absence of
the "Start" button, as would be manifest with GNU/Linux, would
send them all into a paralytic stupor.  All the MBAs and M$ Certs
would be staring blankly at the screens with mouths agape.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487077

FromRatchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com>
Date2019-02-10 21:48 +0000
Message-ID<w_08E.226689$375.118716@fx40.iad>
In reply to#487076
On 2019-02-10, F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 15:02:41 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> 
>> Corporations are run by pragmatic people, and 
>> Windows is the only realistic desktop to deploy in a company.
>> 
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Corporations are run by ignorant idiots
> that have never even HEARD of GNU/Linux.

And why is this?


> These profound dummies know only one thing: Microshit Winblows.
> Then they hire a staff of IT idiots who know only one thing:
> Microshit Winblows.

You are truly clueless. Pick a large corporation, any corporation, and 
you will find Linux used extensively on their servers. And it's been 
like that for years.



> That's how it's been seen the first IBM PCs made their way
> into the first corp offices and that's how it will be far
> into the future.  Microshit is kept alive by brain-dead imbeciles.

The first IBM PCs made their way into offices because IBM legitimized 
the PC as a professional device rather than a toy. That was something 
Atari, Commodore and others could not do at the time despite the well 
known fact that their boxen were far superior in terms of performance. 


> Those people are so fucking stupid that the sudden absence of
> the "Start" button, as would be manifest with GNU/Linux, would
> send them all into a paralytic stupor.  All the MBAs and M$ Certs
> would be staring blankly at the screens with mouths agape.

There is some truth in this however the PC has evolved to the point of 
being an appliance. People use it to accomplish tasks and don't want to 
have to futz with it just to perform those tasks.

If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop market at least try 
using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. At least 
there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while mildly 
entertaining have no such solid argument.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487078

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2019-02-10 23:04 +0000
Message-ID<O528E.290997$XD2.83830@fx10.am4>
In reply to#487077
On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>
> If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop market at least try 
> using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. At least 
> there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while mildly 
> entertaining have no such solid argument. 

Windows established itself in second half of 90es, to be default desktop
OS. I look at forums questioning why users loose their data due
ransomware and other mallace, to figure out that they don't know
better...

>
>
>


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487079

FromRatchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com>
Date2019-02-10 23:15 +0000
Message-ID<4g28E.150181$904.131041@fx22.iad>
In reply to#487078
On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop market at least try 
>> using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. At least 
>> there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while mildly 
>> entertaining have no such solid argument. 
>
> Windows established itself in second half of 90es, to be default desktop
> OS. I look at forums questioning why users loose their data due
> ransomware and other mallace, to figure out that they don't know
> better...

If Linux were more popular back then it would have been the target for 
such attacks. It wouldn't have mattered much. 

Currently the majority of attacks are social engineering attacks and 
some of them are quite sophisticated. Coupled with the first generation 
of home computer users aging, it's a wide open fertile ground for nasty 
people. I just got one the other day on my phone. Some off shore person 
who spoofed a number with the same area code and exchange as my phone 
calls me and tells me my mortgage is going into collection but he can 
save me from the collection agency. All fine except I don't have a 
mortgage. A quick go fuck yourself took care of that one but this is the 
kind of thing that people fall for. I've also had emails complete with 
official looking stationary trying to get me to visit links. A quick 
look at the headers usually shows a source of *.yahoo.com or similar. So 
how many people know how to differentiate between a fake or real email? 
Linux isn't going to help them at all. 


-- 
Ratchet Jaw
The Locked and Loaded Jew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487080

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2019-02-10 23:23 +0000
Message-ID<0o28E.190112$UF1.8541@fx13.am4>
In reply to#487079
On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop market at least try 
>>> using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. At least 
>>> there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while mildly 
>>> entertaining have no such solid argument. 
>>
>> Windows established itself in second half of 90es, to be default desktop
>> OS. I look at forums questioning why users loose their data due
>> ransomware and other mallace, to figure out that they don't know
>> better...
>
> If Linux were more popular back then it would have been the target for 
> such attacks. It wouldn't have mattered much. 

Bulshit. Linux is target as anything else used. It's just that it does
not have so much holes as Windows. There is also OSX, why not attack
that then? Of course, not that easy as Windows...


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487081

FromRatchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com>
Date2019-02-10 23:37 +0000
Message-ID<hB28E.81546$dD4.38881@fx14.iad>
In reply to#487080
On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop market at least try 
>>>> using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. At least 
>>>> there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while mildly 
>>>> entertaining have no such solid argument. 
>>>
>>> Windows established itself in second half of 90es, to be default desktop
>>> OS. I look at forums questioning why users loose their data due
>>> ransomware and other mallace, to figure out that they don't know
>>> better...
>>
>> If Linux were more popular back then it would have been the target for 
>> such attacks. It wouldn't have mattered much. 
>
> Bulshit. Linux is target as anything else used. It's just that it does
> not have so much holes as Windows. There is also OSX, why not attack
> that then? Of course, not that easy as Windows...

Linux has plenty of holes.
https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/33/Linux.html

Here is Windows 10 for comparison.

https://www.cvedetails.com/product/32238/?q=Windows+10



-- 
Ratchet Jaw
The Locked and Loaded Jew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487082

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2019-02-10 23:39 +0000
Message-ID<KC28E.631027$Y32.359751@fx19.am4>
In reply to#487081
On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop market at least try 
>>>>> using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. At least 
>>>>> there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while mildly 
>>>>> entertaining have no such solid argument. 
>>>>
>>>> Windows established itself in second half of 90es, to be default desktop
>>>> OS. I look at forums questioning why users loose their data due
>>>> ransomware and other mallace, to figure out that they don't know
>>>> better...
>>>
>>> If Linux were more popular back then it would have been the target for 
>>> such attacks. It wouldn't have mattered much. 
>>
>> Bulshit. Linux is target as anything else used. It's just that it does
>> not have so much holes as Windows. There is also OSX, why not attack
>> that then? Of course, not that easy as Windows...
>
> Linux has plenty of holes.
> https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/33/Linux.html
>
> Here is Windows 10 for comparison.
>
> https://www.cvedetails.com/product/32238/?q=Windows+10

It has holes but no drive-by malware...
>
>
>


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487083

FromRatchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com>
Date2019-02-10 23:50 +0000
Message-ID<xN28E.451464$Aq8.310417@fx47.iad>
In reply to#487082
On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop market at least try 
>>>>>> using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. At least 
>>>>>> there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while mildly 
>>>>>> entertaining have no such solid argument. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Windows established itself in second half of 90es, to be default desktop
>>>>> OS. I look at forums questioning why users loose their data due
>>>>> ransomware and other mallace, to figure out that they don't know
>>>>> better...
>>>>
>>>> If Linux were more popular back then it would have been the target for 
>>>> such attacks. It wouldn't have mattered much. 
>>>
>>> Bulshit. Linux is target as anything else used. It's just that it does
>>> not have so much holes as Windows. There is also OSX, why not attack
>>> that then? Of course, not that easy as Windows...
>>
>> Linux has plenty of holes.
>> https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/33/Linux.html
>>
>> Here is Windows 10 for comparison.
>>
>> https://www.cvedetails.com/product/32238/?q=Windows+10
>
> It has holes but no drive-by malware...

So now you move the goal posts :) 
Alright, I'll give you that however the reason Linux desktop is not 
attacked much is because the usage is so low. Linux servers are subject 
to the exploits I posted above. And OSX an IOS are also attacked. 
As a desktop system Linux's security model certainly has advantages in 
keeping the root OS isolated however to an end user when all his files 
are gone, it's not gonna matter much that his OS remained untouched.

The days of clicking on a rogue program are mostly coming to an end and 
being replaced by social engineering. Ask Julian Assange about that one 
:) 

Back in the 90's when the biggest problem was clicking on that naked 
Jennifer Aniston.jpg file, which was really an .com or .exe file are 
over and long gone. Even the built in Windows Defender will catch those.

An email from a "bank" targeting a senior citizen can have devastating 
effects though and in a phishing expedition is a far better way of 
mining data.

-- 
Ratchet Jaw
The Locked and Loaded Jew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487084

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2019-02-11 00:29 +0000
Message-ID<Il38E.434039$FF1.402346@fx06.am4>
In reply to#487083
On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop market at least try 
>>>>>>> using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. At least 
>>>>>>> there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while mildly 
>>>>>>> entertaining have no such solid argument. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Windows established itself in second half of 90es, to be default desktop
>>>>>> OS. I look at forums questioning why users loose their data due
>>>>>> ransomware and other mallace, to figure out that they don't know
>>>>>> better...
>>>>>
>>>>> If Linux were more popular back then it would have been the target for 
>>>>> such attacks. It wouldn't have mattered much. 
>>>>
>>>> Bulshit. Linux is target as anything else used. It's just that it does
>>>> not have so much holes as Windows. There is also OSX, why not attack
>>>> that then? Of course, not that easy as Windows...
>>>
>>> Linux has plenty of holes.
>>> https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/33/Linux.html
>>>
>>> Here is Windows 10 for comparison.
>>>
>>> https://www.cvedetails.com/product/32238/?q=Windows+10
>>
>> It has holes but no drive-by malware...
>
> So now you move the goal posts :) 

No. You move goal posts, and accusing me to do what you are doing.
Fact is that there is no case of ransomware on Linux...

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487088

FromRatchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com>
Date2019-02-11 01:01 +0000
Message-ID<zP38E.218352$o84.83522@fx42.iad>
In reply to#487084
On 2019-02-11, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop market at least try 
>>>>>>>> using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. At least 
>>>>>>>> there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while mildly 
>>>>>>>> entertaining have no such solid argument. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Windows established itself in second half of 90es, to be default desktop
>>>>>>> OS. I look at forums questioning why users loose their data due
>>>>>>> ransomware and other mallace, to figure out that they don't know
>>>>>>> better...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If Linux were more popular back then it would have been the target for 
>>>>>> such attacks. It wouldn't have mattered much. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Bulshit. Linux is target as anything else used. It's just that it does
>>>>> not have so much holes as Windows. There is also OSX, why not attack
>>>>> that then? Of course, not that easy as Windows...
>>>>
>>>> Linux has plenty of holes.
>>>> https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/33/Linux.html
>>>>
>>>> Here is Windows 10 for comparison.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.cvedetails.com/product/32238/?q=Windows+10
>>>
>>> It has holes but no drive-by malware...
>>
>> So now you move the goal posts :) 
>
> No. You move goal posts, and accusing me to do what you are doing.
> Fact is that there is no case of ransomware on Linux...

No. I was referring to security. I said nothing of ransomeware. You were 
the one who deviated to that topic.

I clearly showed proof that Linux has severe security risks.
You ignored it and preferred to focus on one type of exploit.
And you showed zero proof of your claims, unlike me.

Obviously you are another Linux zealot who will put blinders on when 
facts are introduced.





-- 
Ratchet Jaw
The Locked and Loaded Jew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487101

FromMel <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2019-02-11 10:24 +0100
Message-ID<almarsoft.476793191463996275@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#487088
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 01:01:19 GMT, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> 
wrote:
> On 2019-02-11, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> > On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
> >> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> >>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2019-02-10, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2019-02-10, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If you want to explain why Windows rules the desktop 
market at least try 
> >>>>>>>> using a legitimate argument like Windows being pre-loaded. 
At least 
> >>>>>>>> there is data to back up such a claim. Your rants while 
mildly 
> >>>>>>>> entertaining have no such solid argument. 
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Windows established itself in second half of 90es, to be 
default desktop
> >>>>>>> OS. I look at forums questioning why users loose their data 
due
> >>>>>>> ransomware and other mallace, to figure out that they don't 
know
> >>>>>>> better...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If Linux were more popular back then it would have been the 
target for 
> >>>>>> such attacks. It wouldn't have mattered much. 
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bulshit. Linux is target as anything else used. It's just 
that it does
> >>>>> not have so much holes as Windows. There is also OSX, why not 
attack
> >>>>> that then? Of course, not that easy as Windows...
> >>>>
> >>>> Linux has plenty of holes.
> >>>> https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/33/Linux.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is Windows 10 for comparison.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.cvedetails.com/product/32238/?q=Windows+10
> >>>
> >>> It has holes but no drive-by malware...
> >>
> >> So now you move the goal posts :) 
> >
> > No. You move goal posts, and accusing me to do what you are doing.
> > Fact is that there is no case of ransomware on Linux...


> No. I was referring to security. I said nothing of ransomeware. You 
were 
> the one who deviated to that topic.


> I clearly showed proof that Linux has severe security risks.
> You ignored it and preferred to focus on one type of exploit.
> And you showed zero proof of your claims, unlike me.


> Obviously you are another Linux zealot who will put blinders on 
when 
> facts are introduced.










> -- 
> Ratchet Jaw
> The Locked and Loaded Jew

Linux has exploits, but nowhere near Windows. That is in million 
cases where Windows desktop is cracked, you will not find single 
linux case.

-- 
Press any key to continue or any other to quit

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487102

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2019-02-11 03:44 -0800
Message-ID<ffe36526-245d-498e-bd46-cb0f4b9e46bb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#487101
On Monday, February 11, 2019 at 4:24:55 AM UTC-5, Mel wrote:
> ...
> 
> Linux has exploits, but nowhere near Windows. That is in million 
> cases where Windows desktop is cracked, you will not find single 
> linux case.


Linux also has users, but nowhere near Windows.  

As such, there's an element of Sutton's law ("Because that's where the money is")
behind the simple raw number comparisons. 
 

-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487103

FromMel <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2019-02-11 13:26 +0100
Message-ID<almarsoft.611436825807894035@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#487102
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 03:44:11 -0800 (PST), -hh 
<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On Monday, February 11, 2019 at 4:24:55 AM UTC-5, Mel wrote:
> > ...
> > 
> > Linux has exploits, but nowhere near Windows. That is in million 
> > cases where Windows desktop is cracked, you will not find single 
> > linux case.




> Linux also has users, but nowhere near Windows.  


> As such, there's an element of Sutton's law ("Because that's where 
the money is")
> behind the simple raw number comparisons. 




> -hh

Windows is highly insecure...

-- 
Press any key to continue or any other to quit

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487104 — To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2019-02-11 04:46 -0800
SubjectTo run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.11--4.46am.Seattle.2019>
In reply to#487103
Branimir wrote:
> Windows is highly insecure...

You are insecure about Windows.

In all my years of using Windows, since 1989 ( and DOS, since 1983 ),
I've yet to experience a malware problem of any kind, shape or form.
To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487135 — Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10.

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2019-02-11 10:41 -0500
SubjectRe: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10.
Message-ID<9q536e1u00r8ahsq3lmsplnn7ojii8671h@4ax.com>
In reply to#487104
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 04:46:28 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:

>Branimir wrote:
>> Windows is highly insecure...
>
>You are insecure about Windows.
>
>In all my years of using Windows, since 1989 ( and DOS, since 1983 ),
>I've yet to experience a malware problem of any kind, shape or form.
>To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10.

True but try telling that to most of these Rubes
in alt.checkmate who are stuck on Windows 7 and
even XP.  LOL.

-- 

Everybody here likes Yours Truly, 
Gregรธry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#487137 — Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„

FromSir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2019-02-11 09:57 -0600
SubjectRe: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„
Message-ID<lvadnT9s7dz1BvzBnZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#487135
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:41:07 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; Sir Gerg teh Yechh
Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>"
determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently 
decided to freely share it with us in
<9q536e1u00r8ahsq3lmsplnn7ojii8671h@4ax.com>:
 
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 04:46:28 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก 
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก Branimir wrote:
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก Windows is highly insecure...
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก You are insecure about Windows. In all my years of using Windows, since 
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก 1989 ( and DOS, since 1983 ), I've yet to experience a malware problem
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก of any kind, shape or form. To run the best software, on the best
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก hardware, you need Windows 10.
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก 
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก True but try telling that to most of these Rubes in alt.checkmate who
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก are stuck on Windows 7 and even XP.  LOL. 
โœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœกโœก 

anybody running XP in this day and age won't be able to connect to a lot of websites because of the SSL updates not being provided by microsoft before they dropped support entirely.

anybody who is smart and doesn't want to have to pay hundreds of dollars for abandonware that they think they can brag about can run one of many flavors of linux or better yet freeBSD.

and now everybody knows that gergles runs windows 10.  make sure that any malware hijacking links have <> around them and aren't line-wrapped if you want them to work properly.

-- 
[THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECKยฎ VALIDATION]

THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web