Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #482156 > unrolled thread

Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P.

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-28 17:04 -0800
    Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:13 -0700
    A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-01 23:51 -0800
      Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-02 11:02 -0600
        Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 09:25 -0800
      There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-03 14:38 -0800
        Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 17:05 -0700
          Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 16:21 -0800
          Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:42 -0800
            Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 05:19 -0800
        Zero kinetic energy. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-03 17:34 -0800
          The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-04 16:35 -0800
          Re: Zero kinetic energy. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 03:30 -0800

#482156 — Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P.

Sam Wormley wrote:
> > Everything free falling in the local spacetime curvatures.

The moon is "falling" away from the earth,
4.3 million tons are "falling" away from the sun every second,
and gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#482158

On 12/28/18 6:04 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> Everything free falling in the local spacetime curvatures.
> 
> The moon is "falling" away from the earth,
> 4.3 million tons are "falling" away from the sun every second,
> and gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P.
> 

Gravity does not exist.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482557 — A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity.

Michael replied:
> >  a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy, but none of the 
> > "eXergy" ( a type of energy that can do work, force * distance ).
> 
> I have no issue with the heat death of the universe.

Good because if you don't understand death,
then you don't understand life, 
and you can't function properly.

> >  Gravity is residual exergy.
> 
> That is simply crap you made up.

A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity;
"work" ( force * distance ) isn't possible.

Compressing our solar system to the size of a baseball,
as it once was, long ago, 
gives it less entropy and more exergy/gravity.

If entropy didn't go up, naturally,
and exergy/gravity didn't go down, naturally,
our time-scape wouldn't exist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482595 — Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity.

On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 23:51:48 -0800 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
Jeff-Relf.Me  @. determined that the following was of great importance 
and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.1--11.51pm.Seattle.2019>:
 
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Michael replied:
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy, but none of the
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ "eXergy" ( a type of energy that can do work, force * distance ).
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I have no issue with the heat death of the universe.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Good because if you don't understand death, then you don't understand
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ life, and you can't function properly.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Gravity is residual exergy.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That is simply crap you made up.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity; "work" ( force *
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ distance ) isn't possible.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Compressing our solar system to the size of a baseball, as it once was, 
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ long ago, gives it less entropy and more exergy/gravity.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ If entropy didn't go up, naturally, and exergy/gravity didn't go down,
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ naturally, our time-scape wouldn't exist.

entropy going "up" has nothing to do with us calling the direction that gravity pulls "down".  in fact, if you take note of accepted physics, gravity pulls toward the CENTER of a mass tangential to it's surface (esp. for planet-sized masses with evolved monkeys on it's surface).

-- 
[THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION]

THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482598 — Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity.

On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-7, Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 23:51:48 -0800 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
> Jeff-Relf.Me  @. determined that the following was of great importance 
> and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.1--11.51pm.Seattle.2019>:
>  
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Michael replied:
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy, but none of the
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ "eXergy" ( a type of energy that can do work, force * distance ).
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I have no issue with the heat death of the universe.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Good because if you don't understand death, then you don't understand
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ life, and you can't function properly.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Gravity is residual exergy.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That is simply crap you made up.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity; "work" ( force *
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ distance ) isn't possible.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Compressing our solar system to the size of a baseball, as it once was, 
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ long ago, gives it less entropy and more exergy/gravity.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ If entropy didn't go up, naturally, and exergy/gravity didn't go down,
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ naturally, our time-scape wouldn't exist.
> 
> entropy going "up" has nothing to do with us calling the direction that gravity pulls "down".  in fact, if you take note of accepted physics, gravity pulls toward the CENTER of a mass tangential to it's surface (esp. for planet-sized masses with evolved monkeys on it's surface).
> 
> -- 
> [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION]
> 
> THIS SPACE FOR RENT
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA
> 
> "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
> seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
> and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
> end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
> everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
> country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
> like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 
> 
> "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
> unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
> terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
> terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
> they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
> keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)
> 
> -
> 
> "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor
> 
> -
> 
> "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 
> 
> -
> 
> "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>
> 
> -
> 
> Golden Killfile, June 2005
> KOTM, November 2006
> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
> Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
> Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
> Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
> Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
> AUK Mascot, September 2007
> Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016



Having to put up with the use of Tar is not what most want to do. The text of the post is a bunch of Klaus Schadenfreude-like crap. We know what that means. 

Klaus Schadenfreude claims to be the Tar-master, let us see him put up a version without the pre-made procedures.

Now Steven Petruzzellis on the other end of the phone doesn't matter. All that matters is Klaus Schadenfreude gets to deliver the punchline. So how to respond? Don't respond to the moron. Reason isn't part of ploy and never can be. What do you get out of lying? And given how repeatedly it is clear that Klaus Schadenfreude's post is some twist of  a narrative Steven Petruzzellis made which had been a beating on Klaus Schadenfreude for something he did which was ill-considered/wrong/etc... its clearly a repeated expression of Klaus Schadenfreude's lingering embarrassment for having been so repeatedly pwned: Klaus Schadenfreude is undeniably unable of dealing with this group. Klaus Schadenfreude is far too unintelligent to write a Tar script. The only scripting he's ever shown he can do is automating his trolling in this group. 



- 
Top Six Ways Klaus Schadenfreude Trolls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OffkiSAsYo8
https://youtu.be/BUjnZhKk1Bg 
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482745 — There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe.

Michael replied:
> [ a uniform heat bath universe might ] 
> have potential energy that can _never_ be used as exergy.

There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe;
so you can't fall down; kinetic energy isn't possible.

> But my point simply is there is no connection between 
> the statistics that drive toward a heat death 
> and the gravitational constant G.  It is a constant.

So ?!  Big G is irrelevant in a uniform heat bath universe.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482751 — Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe.

On 2019-01-03 3:38 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Michael replied:
>> [ a uniform heat bath universe might ]
>> have potential energy that can _never_ be used as exergy.
> 
> There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe;
> so you can't fall down; kinetic energy isn't possible.
> 
>> But my point simply is there is no connection between
>> the statistics that drive toward a heat death
>> and the gravitational constant G.  It is a constant.
> 
> So ?!  Big G is irrelevant in a uniform heat bath universe.
> 
you would know

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482753 — Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe.

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-7, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-03 3:38 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> > Michael replied:
> >> [ a uniform heat bath universe might ]
> >> have potential energy that can _never_ be used as exergy.
> > 
> > There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe;
> > so you can't fall down; kinetic energy isn't possible.
> > 
> >> But my point simply is there is no connection between
> >> the statistics that drive toward a heat death
> >> and the gravitational constant G.  It is a constant.
> > 
> > So ?!  Big G is irrelevant in a uniform heat bath universe.
> > 
> you would know



For all the bragging bigdog has done on this topic, the 'Web Developer' doesn't know how to do this. It literally takes a couple seconds to select a selection and 'print' it. I'm not fuming, just the opposite I am enjoying watching because bigdog's lying is so juvenile. He purposefully did not introduce all the specifications that he would later poo poo... and we all know why, bigdog is too stupid to see why. At least he has trolls rushing to his rescue ;) I am working on a system which will show off how weak Gnome is. Everyone is bigdog -- the oldest gag in the book. 

Who does NOT know that this kind of nonsense is bigdog's approach, not the MO of Rudy Canoza? It's all just projection... the trolling, the forging, the writing of drivel, the animosity... the puffy red eyes and tendency to show how butthurt he is over being booted from the playground for pissing in it again... just what bigdog does ;) 



--
Best CMS Solution of 2017
https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482765 — Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe.

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-7, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-03 3:38 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> > Michael replied:
> >> [ a uniform heat bath universe might ]
> >> have potential energy that can _never_ be used as exergy.
> > 
> > There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe;
> > so you can't fall down; kinetic energy isn't possible.
> > 
> >> But my point simply is there is no connection between
> >> the statistics that drive toward a heat death
> >> and the gravitational constant G.  It is a constant.
> > 
> > So ?!  Big G is irrelevant in a uniform heat bath universe.
> > 
> you would know



I will not ask Jonas Eklundh Communication how any part of Steven Carroll's anatomy tastes no matter how often Jonas Eklundh Communication kisses it. Over and over, the refrain is Jonas Eklundh Communication wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "trolling". Why would you want to limit all scripts on GNU/Linux to what can be done on Windows and macOS? 

At times, an inner world is more valuable than reality. Proof Jonas Eklundh Communication accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png. 

How is bash on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? 

--
Curious how these posts are made? Email: usenet@gallopinginsanity.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482916 — Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe.

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 7:43:02 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-7, % wrote:
> > On 2019-01-03 3:38 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> > > Michael replied:
> > >> [ a uniform heat bath universe might ]
> > >> have potential energy that can _never_ be used as exergy.
> > > 
> > > There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe;
> > > so you can't fall down; kinetic energy isn't possible.
> > > 
> > >> But my point simply is there is no connection between
> > >> the statistics that drive toward a heat death
> > >> and the gravitational constant G.  It is a constant.
> > > 
> > > So ?!  Big G is irrelevant in a uniform heat bath universe.
> > > 
> > you would know
> 
> 
> 
> I will not ask Jonas Eklundh Communication how any part of Steven Carroll's anatomy tastes no matter how often Jonas Eklundh Communication kisses it. Over and over, the refrain is Jonas Eklundh Communication wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "trolling". Why would you want to limit all scripts on GNU/Linux to what can be done on Windows and macOS? 
> 
> At times, an inner world is more valuable than reality. Proof Jonas Eklundh Communication accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png. 
> 
> How is bash on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? 
> 
> --
> Curious how these posts are made? Email: usenet@gallopinginsanity.com



Pro tip: You can not go into a meet and greet, piss in all the alcohol, screw all the dogs, lift the souvenirs and yak in the privy without being observed. In fact Flooder Steve Carroll's lies got bigger. So as might be expected I regret being kind to Flooder Steve Carroll. While I am sure his wife appreciated it, being nice to him made things worse. 

I believe we have different perspectives completely. 

Enough already. You're again trying to bolster yourself beyond your grade. You're the dim bulb and your many hare-brained scripts show this. 

Things change. Perhaps the concept of a website is getting a little dated. 

--
Do not click this link!!
https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482760 — Zero kinetic energy.

Michael replied:
> > Big G is irrelevant in a uniform heat bath universe.
> 
> Wait a minute, you keep posting stuff like "gravity is dying off"
> or "gravity is slowly dying". What does that mean, 
> if not Big G is decreasing to zero?

General Relativity's G is a constant, of course;
no matter, "a uniform heat bath universe" has: 

    No curvature, No exergy, No "down".

Wikipedia says:

  "The Big Freeze" is a scenario under which 
  continued expansion results in a universe that 
  asymptotically approaches absolute zero temperature.

  This scenario, in combination with the Big Rip scenario,
  is currently gaining ground as the most important hypothesis.

In other words:  Zero kinetic energy.

WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482852 — The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero.

Michael replied:
> > Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off.
> 
> It's not dying off if Big G is unchanging.  It will just be 
> less relevant over time, at some time in the future.

The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero.

"The Big Freeze" has no kinetic energy, much less gravitational energy.
There's no "down" direction.

WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482911 — Re: Zero kinetic energy.

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 6:34:54 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Michael replied:
> > > Big G is irrelevant in a uniform heat bath universe.
> > 
> > Wait a minute, you keep posting stuff like "gravity is dying off"
> > or "gravity is slowly dying". What does that mean, 
> > if not Big G is decreasing to zero?
> 
> General Relativity's G is a constant, of course;
> no matter, "a uniform heat bath universe" has: 
> 
>     No curvature, No exergy, No "down".
> 
> Wikipedia says:
> 
>   "The Big Freeze" is a scenario under which 
>   continued expansion results in a universe that 
>   asymptotically approaches absolute zero temperature.
> 
>   This scenario, in combination with the Big Rip scenario,
>   is currently gaining ground as the most important hypothesis.
> 
> In other words:  Zero kinetic energy.
> 
> WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe



Just Wondering pwns owl in every way possible. Does Just Wondering believe the idiocy owl is pushing? Show a case study of a prosperous company that has acquired its position by not caring about its customers or wares. He'd have to have dementia to be unsure of whether or not he "once had" purchased Mint. Remind you of anyone? When a guy can not remember his past claims and applies false, self-image saving codswallop later, it's extremely clear what his ploy is. Everyone is owl -- the oldest gag in the book. It's owl's problem but he blames Just Wondering. Obviously he would rather lie than face reality. 



--
My Snoring Solution
https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web