Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #481702 > unrolled thread

Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary

Started by	fr314159@gmail.com
First post	2018-12-21 05:39 -0800
Last post	2018-12-21 19:49 +0000
Articles	20 on this page of 139 — 18 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

  Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 05:39 -0800
    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 08:23 -0700
      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 07:36 -0800
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 07:52 -0800
          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 07:58 -0800
            fr31 is a concave-head retard Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 08:04 -0800
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 20:48 +0000
              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 17:25 -0500
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 22:42 +0000
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 18:13 -0700
          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 20:46 +0000
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 07:00 -0800
              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 15:05 +0000
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 07:14 -0800
                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:16 +0000
                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:20 -0800
                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:39 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:55 -0800
                          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 17:22 +0000
                            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:40 -0800
                              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 17:57 +0000
                                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:06 -0700
                                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 18:22 +0000
                                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:26 -0700
                                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 18:36 +0000
                "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 10:34 -0800
                  Re: "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-22 15:33 -0500
                    "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 16:00 -0800
                  Re: "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 17:27 -0800
                    Re: "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 17:28 -0800
                      "Time is money" and "Buy some time". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 19:45 -0800
                        Re: "Time is money" and "Buy some time". "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 20:56 -0800
                          We value society. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 21:41 -0800
                            Re: We value society. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-23 00:42 -0600
                            Re: We value society. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:47 -0800
                              Don't get banished to the "woods" (jail). Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-23 13:38 -0800
                  "Time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter." Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 19:54 -0800
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-21 16:40 +0000
          Geniuses post links to their servers. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 09:46 -0800
            Re: Geniuses post links to their servers. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-21 18:15 +0000
              "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 11:01 -0800
                Re: "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 16:40 -0500
                Re: "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 00:31 +0000
                  I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 19:58 -0800
                    Re: I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 05:12 +0000
                      Re: I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:26 +0000
                        Re: I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 08:18 +0000
                          Re: I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 00:58 -0800
                  Re: "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:15 +0000
                    Re: "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 07:42 +0000
          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 09:56 -0800
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-21 18:09 +0000
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 10:33 -0800
              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 11:04 -0800
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 07:23 -0800
                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 15:56 +0000
                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:03 -0800
                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 16:19 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:24 -0800
                          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 16:32 +0000
                            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:43 +0000
                              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:04 -0800
                                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 17:24 +0000
                                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 17:39 +0000
                                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:47 -0800
                                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 17:56 +0000
                                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:04 -0700
                                Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 11:36 -0800
                                  Re: Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 21:44 +0000
                                    Re: Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:34 +0000
                          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 16:42 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-22 15:30 -0500
                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:29 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 16:38 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:51 -0800
                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:19 +0000
                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:22 -0800
                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:41 +0000
                        Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ). Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 10:57 -0800
                          Re: Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ). Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 19:48 +0000
                            Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 12:09 -0800
                              Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 13:20 -0700
                              Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )... Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 20:26 +0000
                                Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 15:58 -0800
                                  Re: Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 19:10 -0500
                            Re: Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ). chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-26 07:33 -0600
                      Usenet servers. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 11:16 -0800
                        Re: Usenet servers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 12:24 -0700
                          Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 11:49 -0800
                            Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 13:19 -0700
                            Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ? "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0800
                        Re: Usenet servers. "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-12-28 08:30 -0800
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 20:45 +0000
      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 10:53 -0500
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 07:58 -0800
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 08:00 -0800
          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 08:16 -0800
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 17:20 -0500
              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 22:41 +0000
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 00:47 +0000
                  You don't need to know, Owl. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 20:05 -0800
                    Re: You don't need to know, Owl. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 05:15 +0000
                      Stick to your knitting, Owl. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 22:02 -0800
                        Re: Stick to your knitting, Owl. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 06:54 +0000
                          "imgur.com"  LOL ! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 23:14 -0800
                            Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 13:18 +0000
                              Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-23 14:50 +0000
                                Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 15:43 +0000
                                  Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:47 -0800
                              Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:37 -0800
                                Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 15:51 +0000
                                  Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-23 16:00 +0000
                                    Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 16:13 +0000
                                Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-23 15:59 +0000
                                  Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 16:14 +0000
                                  Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 08:17 -0800
                                    Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 16:43 +0000
                                      Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-23 16:43 +0000
                                      Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 08:48 -0800
                                        Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 16:52 +0000
                                          Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 09:06 -0800
                                            Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 19:13 +0000
                                        Re: "imgur.com" LOL ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-23 17:00 +0000
                              Promoting "HopTo.ORG". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-23 13:47 -0800
                                Re: Promoting "HopTo.ORG". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:17 +0000
                          Re: Stick to your knitting, Owl. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:29 +0000
                            Re: Stick to your knitting, Owl. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 08:03 +0000
                      Re: You don't need to know, Owl. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:27 +0000
                        Re: You don't need to know, Owl. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 08:08 +0000
                      Re: You don't need to know, Owl. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-22 08:36 -0500
                    Re: You don't need to know, Owl. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:24 +0000
                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:23 +0000
                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 08:21 +0000
      Fabian wants his videos to autoplay, so we have to watch them. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 08:49 -0800
        Re: Fabian wants his videos to autoplay, so we have to watch them. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 17:21 -0500
    Shit Happens:  How else can you account for fr31? Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 08:27 -0800
    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-21 14:43 -0500
      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 12:00 -0800
    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 19:49 +0000

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →

#481895 — Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )...

From	Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Date	2018-12-22 12:09 -0800
Subject	Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )...
Message-ID	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.22--0.09pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to	#481893

Branimir replied:
> > Usenet, unix and C will be around long after 
> > lesser fads ( like Facebook and Java ) have died off.
> 
> Java is already dead.

Android, with its TouchScreen interface ( written in Java ),
has 2+ billion active users and 3.3 million apps, 
-- the largest installed base of any operating system.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481897 — Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )...

From	% <persent@gmail.com>
Date	2018-12-22 13:20 -0700
Subject	Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )...
Message-ID	<brirr0.dd8.17.3@news.alt.net>
In reply to	#481895

On 2018-12-22 1:09 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Branimir replied:
>>> Usenet, unix and C will be around long after
>>> lesser fads ( like Facebook and Java ) have died off.
>>
>> Java is already dead.
> 
> Android, with its TouchScreen interface ( written in Java ),
> has 2+ billion active users and 3.3 million apps,
> -- the largest installed base of any operating system.
> 
that is higher than the number of people that own a computer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481898 — Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )...

From	Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date	2018-12-22 20:26 +0000
Subject	Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )...
Message-ID	<e6xTD.43186$MQ3.14521@fx06.am4>
In reply to	#481895

On 2018-12-22, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> Branimir replied:
>> > Usenet, unix and C will be around long after 
>> > lesser fads ( like Facebook and Java ) have died off.
>> 
>> Java is already dead.
>
> Android, with its TouchScreen interface ( written in Java ),
> has 2+ billion active users and 3.3 million apps, 
> -- the largest installed base of any operating system.

Does not matter. 
https://upperedge.com/oracle/using-java-heres-how-oracles-new-2019-java-se-licensing-affects-you/


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481904 — Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court.

From	Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Date	2018-12-22 15:58 -0800
Subject	Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court.
Message-ID	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.22--3.58pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to	#481898

Branimir replied:
> > Android, with its TouchScreen interface ( written in Java ),
> > has 2+ billion active users and 3.3 million apps, 
> > -- the largest installed base of any operating system.
> 
> Doesn't matter; see: Oracle's new (2019) Java licensing

Google doesn't have to upgrade, so it doesn't matter.
Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court;
you and I will both be dead long before it's resolved.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481906 — Re: Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court.

From	"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date	2018-12-22 19:10 -0500
Subject	Re: Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court.
Message-ID	<qekt1e5dkcr7i2mu3m24i3eorf4l22rlec@4ax.com>
In reply to	#481904

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 15:58:07 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:

>Branimir replied:
>> > Android, with its TouchScreen interface ( written in Java ),
>> > has 2+ billion active users and 3.3 million apps, 
>> > -- the largest installed base of any operating system.
>> 
>> Doesn't matter; see: Oracle's new (2019) Java licensing
>
>Google doesn't have to upgrade, so it doesn't matter.
>Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court;
>you and I will both be dead long before it's resolved.

I can hardly think of anything stupider. Those
old dinosaurs on the Supreme Court know less
about computers and operating systems and 
computer languages than most six-year-olds.

Can you imagine letting Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg
decide anything related to computer technology?

OMG!

-- 

Everybody here likes...
Yours Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482026 — Re: Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ).

From	chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date	2018-12-26 07:33 -0600
Subject	Re: Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ).
Message-ID	<ek072ehka14kc5ajnh3fv0mla8h68qvuho@4ax.com>
In reply to	#481893

Melzzzzz wrote:

> <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>
>> Usenet, unix and C will be around long after 
>> lesser fads ( like Facebook and Java ) have died off.
>
> Java is already dead.

As are desktop computers!  (Not really.)

-- 
"And yet you condemn the free market choosing Windows."  -  "True
Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481890 — Usenet servers.

From	Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Date	2018-12-22 11:16 -0800
Subject	Usenet servers.
Message-ID	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.22--11.16am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to	#481852

Steve asked:
> why would I pay for Usenet when I can do it for nothing ?

Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ),
Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet.
For that, use INN servers; to wit:
  
  News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
  News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
  News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
          News.Individual.NET:119
  
  "Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year.
  "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ).
  Register at:  Open-News-Network.ORG/register
                Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh.
  
Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you !
For that, use a binary server; to wit:
  
  News.US.Usenet-News.NET:119  or  usNews.BlockNews.NET:119 
  
  They won't censor you; they don't even keep the "Path:" line,
  so you can't be identified.  Their archive is over 15 years deep.
  $5 buys you 11 gigs, enough for several life times.
  If one is down ( -very- unlikely ), use the other one.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481891 — Re: Usenet servers.

From	% <persent@gmail.com>
Date	2018-12-22 12:24 -0700
Subject	Re: Usenet servers.
Message-ID	<briojm.a66.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to	#481890

On 2018-12-22 12:16 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Steve asked:
>> why would I pay for Usenet when I can do it for nothing ?
> 
> Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ),
> Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet.
> For that, use INN servers; to wit:
>    
>    News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
>    News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
>    News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
>            News.Individual.NET:119
>    
>    "Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year.
>    "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ).
>    Register at:  Open-News-Network.ORG/register
>                  Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh.
>    
> Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you !
> For that, use a binary server; to wit:
>    
>    News.US.Usenet-News.NET:119  or  usNews.BlockNews.NET:119
>    
>    They won't censor you; they don't even keep the "Path:" line,
>    so you can't be identified.  Their archive is over 15 years deep.
>    $5 buys you 11 gigs, enough for several life times.
>    If one is down ( -very- unlikely ), use the other one.
> 
why work if you can be on welfare

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481894 — Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?

From	Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Date	2018-12-22 11:49 -0800
Subject	Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?
Message-ID	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.22--11.49am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to	#481891

> Why work if you can be on welfare ?

Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481896 — Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?

From	% <persent@gmail.com>
Date	2018-12-22 13:19 -0700
Subject	Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?
Message-ID	<brirp8.dd8.17.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to	#481894

On 2018-12-22 12:49 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> Why work if you can be on welfare ?
> 
> Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?
> 
ok but you'll have to pay for it ,
there is no alt.free.asswipe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482185 — Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?

From	"Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com>
Date	2018-12-29 10:36 -0800
Subject	Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?
Message-ID	<M8PVD.63151$0e.56293@fx29.iad>
In reply to	#481894

On 12/22/2018 11:49 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> Why work if you can be on welfare ?
> 
> Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?
> 
Assworm is all ass.
LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#482116 — Re: Usenet servers.

From	"Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com>
Date	2018-12-28 08:30 -0800
Subject	Re: Usenet servers.
Message-ID	<ncsVD.193320$J8.153500@fx37.iad>
In reply to	#481890

Is it me, or is all of this just a load of Malarkey?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481778

From	Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date	2018-12-21 20:45 +0000
Message-ID	<VhcTD.79368$ck7.3305@fx02.am4>
In reply to	#481718

On 2018-12-21, fr314159@gmail.com <fr314159@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:23:10 AM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>> 
>> No matter, it's not like there aren't plenty of places to post
>> them for free.
>>
>
> Sure, and every one of those javashit-choked web "services"
> pollutes the posting with various writhing and twisting ads
> and will perhaps even subject the visitor to some ridiculous
> hoop jumping just to view the material.
>
> When the fuck are you going to realize that a "free" web service
> is not actually free?
>
> Oh, yes.  For a total idiot like you the answer is NEVER.
>
> Either post your stuff to your own domain which you control
> or else post to Usenet.
>
> The case is closed.

Use privoxy or such...
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481722

From	SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date	2018-12-21 10:53 -0500
Message-ID	<Z%7TD.80872$le.70343@fx14.iad>
In reply to	#481716

On 2018-12-21 10:23 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2018-12-21 13:39:09 +0000, fr314159@gmail.com said:
> 
>> As the Microshit Corp. degenerates (can garbage degenerate?) we now have
>> a new bastard asshole on the block and that is Google.
> 
> By what reasoning is the Google Groups service, which is
> almost 18 years old, considered "new"?

Considering Fabian is stuck in 1975 and probably wears clothes from that 
era (including undergarments), anything that emerged after that time is 
just wrong.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Free software advocate
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481725

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2018-12-21 07:58 -0800
Message-ID	<23bb3d3e-3cd2-427a-8ced-800400a2b544@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#481722

On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 8:53:31 AM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-12-21 10:23 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On 2018-12-21 13:39:09 +0000, fr314159@gmail.com said:
> > 
> >> As the Microshit Corp. degenerates (can garbage degenerate?) we now have
> >> a new bastard asshole on the block and that is Google.
> > 
> > By what reasoning is the Google Groups service, which is
> > almost 18 years old, considered "new"?
> 
> Considering Fabian is stuck in 1975 and probably wears clothes from that 
> era (including undergarments), anything that emerged after that time is 
> just wrong.

I know, the guy is whacked. FWIW, regarding his bitch about ads, 
I don't  believe I've seen any on imgur.com or streamable.com, both 
free services I've used. The user clicks the link, they see the thing
<shrug>. Why should it be more difficult if it doesn't have to be?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481726

From	fr314159@gmail.com
Date	2018-12-21 08:00 -0800
Message-ID	<dbcf7d2d-5d9f-48b2-9ab7-f6460f7042cc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#481722

On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:53:31 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote:

> 
> stuck in 1975 
>

Your brain is stuck in 1975 BCE.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481731

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2018-12-21 08:16 -0800
Message-ID	<ee0243d3-fd11-45e9-b9b5-d01a8fd23126@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#481726

On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 9:00:26 AM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:53:31 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
> > 
> > stuck in 1975 
> >
> 
> Your brain is stuck in 1975 BCE.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era

Why are you linking to a page that uses 'that Javash*t', Feeb?!

Here's one that doesn't:

<http://math.stanford.edu/~ryzhik/Feinberg1.html>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481783

From	SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date	2018-12-21 17:20 -0500
Message-ID	<%GdTD.18588$ec.1939@fx26.iad>
In reply to	#481731

On 2018-12-21 11:16 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 9:00:26 AM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:53:31 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> stuck in 1975
>>>
>>
>> Your brain is stuck in 1975 BCE.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era
> 
> Why are you linking to a page that uses 'that Javash*t', Feeb?!
> 
> Here's one that doesn't:
> 
> <http://math.stanford.edu/~ryzhik/Feinberg1.html>

In response to Fabian Russell, I just want to say that I wholly reject 
the BCE terminology. It's B.C. and A.D. as far as I'm concerned.

Anyone who denies Christ is a heathen in my book.


-- 
SilverSlimer
Free software advocate
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481788

From	Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date	2018-12-21 22:41 +0000
Message-ID	<d_dTD.90003$krL1.70946@fx15.am4>
In reply to	#481783

On 2018-12-21, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> On 2018-12-21 11:16 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 9:00:26 AM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:53:31 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> stuck in 1975
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your brain is stuck in 1975 BCE.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era
>> 
>> Why are you linking to a page that uses 'that Javash*t', Feeb?!
>> 
>> Here's one that doesn't:
>> 
>> <http://math.stanford.edu/~ryzhik/Feinberg1.html>
>
> In response to Fabian Russell, I just want to say that I wholly reject 
> the BCE terminology. It's B.C. and A.D. as far as I'm concerned.
>
> Anyone who denies Christ is a heathen in my book.

Why would anyone beleive that dead man flew into the sky?
>
>


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481804

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date	2018-12-22 00:47 +0000
Message-ID	<zz0b8803ga.ah43tq@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to	#481788

Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 2018-12-21, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On 2018-12-21 11:16 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 9:00:26 AM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:53:31 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> stuck in 1975
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your brain is stuck in 1975 BCE.
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era
>>> 
>>> Why are you linking to a page that uses 'that Javash*t', Feeb?!
>>> 
>>> Here's one that doesn't:
>>> 
>>> <http://math.stanford.edu/~ryzhik/Feinberg1.html>
>>
>> In response to Fabian Russell, I just want to say that I wholly reject 
>> the BCE terminology. It's B.C. and A.D. as far as I'm concerned.
>>
>> Anyone who denies Christ is a heathen in my book.
> 
> Why would anyone beleive that dead man flew into the sky?
>

Why would anyone believe that man walked on the moon?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcz0eL_bYsI

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →

csiph-web

Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary

Contents

#481895 — Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )...

#481897 — Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )...

#481898 — Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )...

#481904 — Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court.

#481906 — Re: Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court.

#482026 — Re: Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ).

#481890 — Usenet servers.

#481891 — Re: Usenet servers.

#481894 — Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?

#481896 — Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?

#482185 — Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ?

#482116 — Re: Usenet servers.

#481778

#481722

#481725

#481726

#481731

#481783

#481788

#481804