Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286934 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-31 06:14 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-03-31 21:18 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 466 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 06:14 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:39 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 14:47 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:56 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:02 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 13:02 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 13:30 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:37 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:19 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:27 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 14:14 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:18 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 10:07 -0400
At least the Ezekreep likes this shameless, documented liar chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 13:02 -0500
Re: At least the Ezekreep likes this shameless, documented liar DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 14:29 -0400
Re: At least the Ezekreep likes this shameless, documented liar GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:18 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:34 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-03-31 18:27 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 12:33 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-03-31 19:10 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 12:50 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 20:07 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 16:12 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:16 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-04-01 02:33 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 11:59 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 00:57 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 06:51 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 07:55 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 12:12 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 14:08 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 08:26 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 14:53 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 09:05 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:44 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 16:18 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 10:40 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:21 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 14:04 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:38 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:24 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:19 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:19 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 10:30 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:46 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 18:25 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-04 11:51 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:18 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:23 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:51 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 07:05 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:06 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 11:56 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 20:08 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:20 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-05 01:02 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-05 00:50 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:29 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-05 11:34 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:28 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-05 22:44 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 15:27 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-05 23:36 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 13:07 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-06 07:30 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 10:39 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:15 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:20 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:54 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 22:00 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:21 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:17 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 01:05 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:57 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:53 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:58 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 10:31 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 12:59 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 20:54 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:12 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 08:23 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:11 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 13:08 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:10 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:16 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 13:09 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 20:49 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 15:46 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 21:22 +0000
Just get Mint, Okay? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 15:59 -0700
Re: Just get Mint, Okay? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 23:32 +0000
Re: Just get Mint, Okay? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:52 -0600
Re: Just get Mint, Okay? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 12:35 +0000
Re: Just get Mint, Okay? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-04 00:38 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:09 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:06 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:04 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:02 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:51 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-02 08:58 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:21 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 16:16 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 09:32 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 10:41 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:02 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 10:38 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:01 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:59 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:56 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:02 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 03:17 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 09:42 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:34 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-04-01 02:39 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:39 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 09:18 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 09:27 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:00 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 11:13 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 11:56 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:06 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 11:07 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 11:56 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 20:00 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:27 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:17 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 21:13 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:16 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:16 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:26 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 23:00 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 20:08 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 01:10 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-02 13:53 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 15:15 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:53 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:29 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:23 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:50 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-02 05:06 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:44 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:44 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 00:07 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-02 23:27 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 01:02 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:47 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 23:36 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 09:33 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 11:54 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:46 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:36 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:18 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:46 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:35 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:17 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-07 13:12 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 17:22 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-07 23:55 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-07 18:11 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 18:30 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 19:04 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 00:42 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 19:04 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 09:54 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 11:08 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-08 12:08 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 15:12 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 17:39 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-08 22:38 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 12:35 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 12:30 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:26 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 15:08 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 19:02 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:19 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 18:12 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 19:01 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 10:25 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:59 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 00:40 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:25 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-07 23:43 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 00:52 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 19:16 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:58 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 10:23 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-08 12:58 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 13:25 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-08 10:55 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:52 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:51 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:57 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 22:54 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:21 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:54 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:53 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 10:15 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 18:07 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:49 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 00:39 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 22:48 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-08 16:47 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-08 23:57 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-08 17:11 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:24 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-09 00:01 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 09:44 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:48 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-09 12:37 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-09 07:39 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 16:57 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-09 12:03 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:22 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:29 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:36 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 10:10 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:13 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:18 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:31 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:10 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:19 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 08:51 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:17 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-07 18:03 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:52 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 07:24 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-08 05:37 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 09:34 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-08 07:44 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 14:58 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 15:03 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 13:14 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:47 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:24 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 22:41 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-07 21:20 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:27 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 10:28 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:45 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 09:50 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-07 22:35 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-07 13:58 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 17:31 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 22:28 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 19:14 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:50 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:04 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 11:12 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:39 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-08 12:11 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 07:34 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 12:36 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 07:38 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-08 07:11 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 13:59 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 18:01 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 17:22 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 18:28 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 13:01 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:17 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 12:52 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 09:39 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:46 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 12:26 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:16 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:23 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:29 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-10 07:51 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 10:48 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:09 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:05 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 10:19 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 16:42 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:15 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 10:13 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:14 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-10 07:22 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 14:44 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:44 -0400
Turdv is a Troll that uses windows. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:01 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:35 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-09 14:04 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 10:20 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 10:19 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 17:27 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 11:42 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 17:49 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 18:00 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 18:16 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 12:04 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 12:09 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 18:53 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 13:09 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 19:18 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 13:48 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 14:16 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 14:48 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 21:27 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 15:35 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:27 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:41 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 17:24 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:22 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:20 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-09 15:16 -0700
The Zeke dissembling layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-09 19:07 -0400
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 23:09 +0000
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-10 02:33 +0200
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 20:40 -0400
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 20:46 -0400
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 21:05 -0400
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:19 -0600
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-10 04:38 +0200
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-10 02:41 +0000
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-10 04:51 +0200
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-10 06:41 -0500
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-10 05:43 -0700
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:28 -0400
Here's a fart for you to sniff, Turdv. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:00 -0600
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:00 -0600
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 10:48 -0400
WrongB the LinCultist. Guffaw!!! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 11:59 -0600
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 11:57 -0600
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-10 02:37 +0000
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-10 04:48 +0200
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-10 06:08 -0400
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-10 03:50 -0700
Here, it's all wank, no work. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 19:50 -0700
Re: Here, it's all wank, no work. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:14 -0400
Re: The Zeke dissembling layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:18 -0600
Re: Christopher John Ahlstrom enjoys the male penis "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:07 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:00 -0400
What's optimal ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 18:40 -0700
Re: What's optimal ? ! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 22:00 -0400
My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 19:29 -0700
Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 22:33 -0400
My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 19:40 -0700
Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 22:55 -0400
My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 20:07 -0700
OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 20:14 -0700
Re: OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 10:42 -0400
Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 01:21 -0400
OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs, $474. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 23:00 -0700
OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 23:10 -0700
Re: OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs, $474. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 08:32 -0400
OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs, $474. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 05:57 -0700
This "hobo" is doing better than DFS. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 06:10 -0700
Re: This "hobo" is doing better than DFS. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 09:18 -0400
Re: This "hobo" is doing better than DFS. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:31 -0400
Re: OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs, $474. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:12 -0400
Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 10:46 -0400
Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:16 -0400
Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:12 -0400
Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:09 -0400
I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 06:15 -0700
Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 09:41 -0400
My (top rated) SSD is 2.54 times faster than DFS'. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 07:44 -0700
Re: My (top rated) SSD is 2.54 times faster than DFS'. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-12 08:04 -0400
The Vector 4 remains "top rated". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-12 07:13 -0700
Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:35 -0400
Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-10 08:59 -0700
I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 09:38 -0700
Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 15:07 -0400
CrystalDiskMark 3_0_4. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: CrystalDiskMark 3_0_4. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-11 01:27 +0000
Re: CrystalDiskMark 3_0_4. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 23:04 -0400
"100% drive life"; no degregation. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-11 00:21 -0700
Re: "100% drive life"; no degregation. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-11 12:55 -0400
Cell phones are what keeps your girlfriend entertained. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-11 11:05 -0700
Re: "100% drive life"; no degregation. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-12 07:51 -0400
The i7-4790S has "HD Graphics 4600" built in. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-12 06:02 -0700
Re: The i7-4790S has "HD Graphics 4600" built in. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-12 11:35 -0400
When idle, the i7-4790S consumes less power, 65 Watts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-12 09:31 -0700
Re: When idle, the i7-4790S consumes less power, 65 Watts. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-12 15:37 -0400
Thank God for cell phones and laptops. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-12 19:23 -0700
Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 06:06 -0700
Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-13 10:47 -0400
@Slimer is anonymous, ashamed. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 08:29 -0700
Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 08:45 -0700
I'm the direct opposite of a road warrior. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 09:12 -0700
Re: I'm the direct opposite of a road warrior. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-13 13:05 -0400
Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 11:05 -0700
Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-13 17:42 -0400
You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 16:48 -0700
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 17:45 -0700
IO operations per second. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 22:12 -0700
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 08:57 -0400
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-14 08:33 -0700
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 12:18 -0400
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-14 11:15 -0700
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 18:23 -0400
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-14 15:27 -0700
Today, the Mac Mini is a REAL desktop PC. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-14 09:56 -0700
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-13 22:33 -0400
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-14 04:08 -0700
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 09:00 -0400
Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 08:47 -0400
Road warriors. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 08:04 -0700
Re: Road warriors. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 08:58 -0700
Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:32 -0400
Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 11:15 -0400
Hour·long, 1080p, surround·sound videos are gigaBytes each. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 09:15 -0700
Re: Hour·long, 1080p, surround·sound videos are gigaBytes each. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 15:05 -0400
Cell phones are NOTHING compared my 4K IPS monitor... Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 19:15 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-10 07:07 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-10 07:27 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-09 11:08 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 17:04 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:38 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 17:17 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 10:25 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 17:00 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:16 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 12:59 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 14:47 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 10:02 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:15 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:14 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-08 11:48 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-08 11:56 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 17:25 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-08 12:02 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:07 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 22:09 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 19:14 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 13:12 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:49 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:40 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:39 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-07 17:30 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 17:07 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:47 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:15 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 16:21 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 13:05 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:45 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-07 10:48 -0700
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 20:46 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 20:48 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:41 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 00:05 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:45 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:41 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:13 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:46 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:26 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:40 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 00:04 +0200
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:40 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:31 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 11:52 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 11:55 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-02 13:44 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:56 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-31 09:50 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 14:58 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 10:18 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-31 10:39 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 16:46 +0100
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:30 -0600
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 12:37 -0500
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 16:11 -0400
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 20:15 +0000
Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:18 -0400
Page 17 of 24 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 24 Next page →
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 12:00 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: The Zeke dissembling layer |
| Message-ID | <tcidneBZUfctkrXInZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #288836 |
Melzzzzz wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:41:39 +0000 (UTC) > ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> But, please, quit feeding the trolls. >> > I react when I think there is something to say appropriate in cause > of Linux ;p Gee, why then am I running RedHat? Is that sound like trolling? Get real. You did have a few good points that RonB won't answer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 10:48 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The Zeke dissembling layer |
| Message-ID | <mg8nqs$rqq$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288829 |
On 4/9/2015 10:41 PM, ronb wrote: > But, please, quit feeding the trolls. What would you talk about then, RonG? Your $60 crapbox running Linux hobbyware? Sounds damn depressing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 11:59 -0600 |
| Subject | WrongB the LinCultist. Guffaw!!! |
| Message-ID | <tcidneFZUffukrXInZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #288829 |
ronb wrote: <snipped your brain rot out> nothing left of him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 11:57 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: The Zeke dissembling layer |
| Message-ID | <tcidneZZUfe7krXInZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #288825 |
Melzzzzz wrote: > On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 20:19:21 -0600 > GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> Melzzzzz wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 23:09:22 +0000 (UTC) >> > ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:07:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >> >> >> > Doesn't take much to set Zeke off. He's combustible. >> >> >> >> All the WinTroll and iCultist bitter old biddies are. If they were >> >> normal people just using their computers, they wouldn't be at COLA >> >> 24/7 obsessed with an operating system they clearly hate. What a >> >> pathetic waste of life. >> >> >> > >> > They could be payed, ... >> >> HAH! I wished I were paid. >> Are you paid to lie for Linux? >> > > No, but I am not trolling Windows newsgroup.... Heh... neither am I.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 02:37 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Zeke dissembling layer |
| Message-ID | <mg7d1p$mmj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288785 |
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:33:53 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 23:09:22 +0000 (UTC) > ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:07:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >> > Doesn't take much to set Zeke off. He's combustible. >> >> All the WinTroll and iCultist bitter old biddies are. If they were >> normal people just using their computers, they wouldn't be at COLA 24/7 >> obsessed with an operating system they clearly hate. What a pathetic >> waste of life. >> >> > They could be payed, ... If they are, Microsoft and Apple are not getting their money's worth -- unless they only care about trolling volume and not trolling quality. -- To WinDrones and iCultists obsessed with Linux. Get a life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 04:48 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The Zeke dissembling layer |
| Message-ID | <20150410044809.2d282351@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #288824 |
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:37:45 +0000 (UTC) ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:33:53 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 23:09:22 +0000 (UTC) > > ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:07:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> > >> > Doesn't take much to set Zeke off. He's combustible. > >> > >> All the WinTroll and iCultist bitter old biddies are. If they were > >> normal people just using their computers, they wouldn't be at COLA > >> 24/7 obsessed with an operating system they clearly hate. What a > >> pathetic waste of life. > >> > >> > > They could be payed, ... > > If they are, Microsoft and Apple are not getting their money's worth > -- unless they only care about trolling volume and not trolling > quality. > I think that they are desperate ;p
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 06:08 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The Zeke dissembling layer |
| Message-ID | <mg87dp$ufd$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288824 |
ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:33:53 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > >> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 23:09:22 +0000 (UTC) >> ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:07:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>> > Doesn't take much to set Zeke off. He's combustible. >>> >>> All the WinTroll and iCultist bitter old biddies are. If they were >>> normal people just using their computers, they wouldn't be at COLA 24/7 >>> obsessed with an operating system they clearly hate. What a pathetic >>> waste of life. >>> >> They could be payed, ... > > If they are, Microsoft and Apple are not getting their money's worth -- > unless they only care about trolling volume and not trolling quality. All they care about is making people avoid realistic discussion of alternatives. Flinging shit and libel is about as easy as it gets for the anonymous cowards that hang out here (and ZDnet, for example). -- If it is a Miracle, any sort of evidence will answer, but if it is a Fact, proof is necessary. -- Samuel Clemens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 03:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Zeke dissembling layer |
| Message-ID | <e5af7d44-734b-4450-854f-3885987e6558@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #288877 |
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:33:53 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > >> ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> All the WinTroll and iCultist bitter old biddies are. If they were > >>> normal people just using their computers, they wouldn't be at COLA 24/7 > >>> obsessed with an operating system they clearly hate. What a pathetic > >>> waste of life. > >>> > >> They could be payed, ... > > > > If they are, Microsoft and Apple are not getting their money's worth -- > > unless they only care about trolling volume and not trolling quality. > > All they care about is making people avoid realistic discussion of > alternatives. Flinging shit and libel is about as easy as it gets for the > anonymous cowards that hang out here (and ZDnet, for example). Golly, that statement certainly is full of bullshit libel when one realizes just how strongly Chris and ron and most others did an avoidance dance when they were given some representative case study examples and asked to Name Names of alternative equivalent Linux products without the usual hand-waiving nonsense. To hear it even implied that they're the source of 'realistic discussions' for Linux alternatives is downright laughable, as it really shows that this is just one more whine because their burnt butthurt brisket has a heaping side helping of denial. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 19:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Here, it's all wank, no work. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.9{7.50P.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #288785 |
Melzzz, "Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy" is a virtual masturbation fest, complete wtih moaning and groaning, precisely because NO ONE HERE IS PAID to do otherwise. Here, it's all wank, no work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 09:14 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Here, it's all wank, no work. |
| Message-ID | <mg8iaf$7g8$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288835 |
On 2015-04-09 10:50 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Melzzz, "Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy" is a virtual masturbation fest, > complete wtih moaning and groaning, > precisely because NO ONE HERE IS PAID to do otherwise. > > Here, it's all wank, no work. Kind of like your everyday life, right Jeff? -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 20:18 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: The Zeke dissembling layer |
| Message-ID | <EbWdnWeLfZOXrrrInZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #288776 |
ronb wrote: > On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:07:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> Doesn't take much to set Zeke off. He's combustible. > > All the WinTroll and iCultist bitter old biddies are. If they were normal > people just using their computers, they wouldn't be at COLA 24/7 obsessed > with an operating system they clearly hate. What a pathetic waste of life. > Guffaw!!! You hypocrite! Why are you hating MS and Apple then? Keep your hatred to yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 20:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Christopher John Ahlstrom enjoys the male penis |
| Message-ID | <mg745h$3o0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288772 |
"Chris Ahlstrom" <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in message news:mg70lu$ogs$1@dont-email.me... > vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 04/09/2015 11:48 AM, Ezekiel wrote: >> >>> <snip-o-rama> >> >> Your intention appeared to be showing how much more had to happen on a >> compressed filesystem by comparing/contrasting the steps involved. But >> not only did you leave out analogous steps for the uncompressed >> filesystem, but you put two "steps" on the same line. While it may have >> only been a mistake, it certainly looks like an attempt to be >> intellectually dishonest. > > What!? Heaven forfend! Shut up and go away. Like any sane person I don't waste my time reading your drivel. But when I see my name in the subject line then the post does get my attention. I want nothing to do with a spineless pansy-ass like you. So why don't you do the same and stop putting my name in the subject line. Spend your time talking wth "William" about how reset buttons exist because of Windows and <giggle> with turdv about how you want to wipe his penis. "I am not worthy to wipe your pee-pee <grin>." MsgId: <6lc1k.4449$UF5.2768@bignews8.bellsouth.net> >> At this point, though, it really doesn't matter to me what you meant to >> do, because you immediately went on the attack and popped-off with your >> "me too" nonsense. So all that I cared about was pointing out where you >> were wrong about that, and the previous post -- and now, this post too. > > Doesn't take much to set Zeke off. He's combustible. It doesn't take much to get a freak like Chris Ahlstrom to imagine a penis is "exposing itself" to him. A simple laptop commercial is more than adequate. -- I got a big laugh out of the Surface add where they boast about the USB port, showing someone carrying one with a big blue *dongle* <laughing> hanging off of it, like it was exposing itself. Chris Ahlstrom - sees a laptop "exposing itself" in a tv commercial. 12 Nov 2014 <m3vffh$qke$1@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 20:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mg73no$2et$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288769 |
"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message
news:5526fa48$0$54597$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com...
> On 04/09/2015 11:48 AM, Ezekiel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm glad you said something.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So did the official BTRFS Wiki which agrees with what I wrote.
>>>>
>>>> <quote>
>>>> <b>Are there speed penalties when doing random access to a compressed
>>>> file?</b>
>>>>
>>>> Yes. The compression processes ranges of a file of maximum size 128 KiB
>>>> and
>>>> compresses each 4 KiB (or page-sized) block separately. Accessing a
>>>> byte
>>>> in
>>>> the middle of the given 128 KiB range requires to decompress the whole
>>>> range. This is not optimal and is subject to optimizations and further
>>>> development.
>>>> </quote>
>>>> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Compression
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note the part about "speed penalties = YES" for random access.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you can stop your "me too" posts long enough to learn what
>>>> you're
>>>> talking about.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps you can stop your bloviating long enough to realize that the
>>> underlying device reads and writes a block at a time, no matter what.
>>
>> I never said that disk read/writes did not happen one block at a time.
>> That's your strawman.
>
> No, you just failed to state it, in your
> list-of-things-that-have-to-happen-when-writing-8-bytes.
It wasn't mentioned because I was talking about the larger compressed blocks
("ranges") and not the actual disk blocks.
> Your intention appeared to be showing how much more had to happen on a
> compressed filesystem by comparing/contrasting the steps involved. But
> not only did you leave out analogous steps for the uncompressed
> filesystem, but you put two "steps" on the same line. While it may have
> only been a mistake, it certainly looks like an attempt to be
> intellectually dishonest.
Nothing was attempted. The objective was to talk about the relevant feature
of BTRFS which are the compressed blocks/ranges. I didn't mention disk
blocks, movement of the drive heads, hdd command queuing, the number of
platters, or disk-striping either.
> At this point, though, it really doesn't matter to me what you meant to
> do, because you immediately went on the attack and popped-off with your
> "me too" nonsense.
That's because "me too" is what your terse 5 word post sounded like. Make
your posts clearer and I'll be less likely to misinterpret them.
> So all that I cared about was pointing out where you
> were wrong about that, and the previous post -- and now, this post too.
The general point was and still is that disk compression is not always going
to be faster. There are simply too many variables to make a blanket
statement like that.
If compression is *always* faster then why not enable it by default or even
better... why even give users the option? Just compress everything all the
time if it's always going to be faster regardless of how and where it's
used.
That's why options like compression need to be benchmarked and measured to
see what the actual performance is going to be in a specific environment.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 18:40 -0700 |
| Subject | What's optimal ? ! |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.9{6.40P.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #288769 |
Wow, such emotion, such delicate egos ! Uncompressed, a ( 4 KiloByte ) "sector" is the smallest thing you can read/write. Compressed, a ( 128 KiloByte ) "block of sectors" is the smallest thing you can read/write. What's optimal ? ! I have more than enough diskspace; so I favor speed over compression. My ( OCZ Vertex 2 ) SSD is super fast.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 22:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: What's optimal ? ! |
| Message-ID | <mg7ap9$aua$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288793 |
On 2015-04-09 9:40 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Wow, such emotion, such delicate egos ! > > Uncompressed, a ( 4 KiloByte ) "sector" > is the smallest thing you can read/write. > > Compressed, a ( 128 KiloByte ) "block of sectors" > is the smallest thing you can read/write. > > What's optimal ? ! > > I have more than enough diskspace; > so I favor speed over compression. > My ( OCZ Vertex 2 ) SSD is super fast. I hope that your OCZ lasts. Apparently, they're excellent drives as far as speed is concerned but notoriously unreliable. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 19:29 -0700 |
| Subject | My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.9{7.29P.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #288797 |
Slimer replied to me, saying: > > My ( OCZ Vertex 2 ) SSD is super fast. > > I hope that your OCZ lasts. Apparently, > they're excellent drives as far > as speed is concerned but notoriously unreliable. I heard the exact opposite. It's extremely reliable ! ! Mine is 3 years old, no problems yet; and I'm a heavy, heavy user... HEAVY. Every day, I read/write about 10 gigaBytes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 22:33 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. |
| Message-ID | <mg7cni$n1q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288816 |
On 04/09/2015 10:29 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Slimer replied to me, saying: >>> My ( OCZ Vertex 2 ) SSD is super fast. >> >> I hope that your OCZ lasts. Apparently, >> they're excellent drives as far >> as speed is concerned but notoriously unreliable. > > I heard the exact opposite. > It's extremely reliable ! ! > > Mine is 3 years old, no problems yet; > and I'm a heavy, heavy user... HEAVY. > Every day, I read/write about 10 gigaBytes. Read the NewEgg reviews of OCZ SSD drives. I won't ever buy one, or anything from that company. I don't trust them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 19:40 -0700 |
| Subject | My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.9{7.40P.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #288820 |
Replying to me, DFS wrote: > > My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable; > > no problems yet, and I'm a heavy, heavy user... HEAVY. > > Every day, I read/write about 10 gigaBytes. > > Read the NewEgg reviews of OCZ SSD drives. > I won't ever buy one, or anything from that company. > I don't trust them. Ah, you have something better ? No, you don't. You have a DumpsterDiver(tm) HD. Unlike me, you never read Amazon's reviews. Hell, you don't even know that Amazon has more/better reviews ! !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 22:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. |
| Message-ID | <mg7e0k$pmv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288827 |
On 04/09/2015 10:40 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Replying to me, DFS wrote: >>> My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable; >>> no problems yet, and I'm a heavy, heavy user... HEAVY. >>> Every day, I read/write about 10 gigaBytes. >> >> Read the NewEgg reviews of OCZ SSD drives. >> I won't ever buy one, or anything from that company. >> I don't trust them. > > Ah, you have something better ? > > No, you don't. You have a DumpsterDiver(tm) HD. Corsair Force Data (something like that) 120GB SSD. I don't know if it's better, but I trust it a lot more than OCZ. > Unlike me, you never read Amazon's reviews. > Hell, you don't even know that Amazon has more/better reviews ! ! I read Amazon reviews and NewEgg reviews and Anandtech reviews and Tom's Hardware reviews, etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 20:07 -0700 |
| Subject | My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.9{8.07P.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #288838 |
Replying to me, you (@DFS) wrote: > > My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. > > Do you have something better ? > > No, you don't. You have a DumpsterDiver(tm) HD. > > Corsair Force Data (something like that) 120GB SSD. > I don't know if it's better, but I trust it a lot more than OCZ. Right, you don't know and I do; because I read the reviews/benchmarks and you didn't. Besides, 120 gigaBytes is too small.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 24 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 24 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web