Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #483333 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-08 03:48 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-11 14:32 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 505 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Serbia is again dictatorship Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-08 03:48 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 20:23 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 01:05 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-01-08 11:11 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 03:57 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-08 19:17 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-09 01:28 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 19:00 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 08:20 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 18:37 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 18:40 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 08:04 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-09 07:28 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 07:29 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:39 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 07:54 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-09 10:11 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 08:30 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-09 11:14 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 09:21 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 10:10 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-09 12:35 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 11:44 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 12:16 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 12:47 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-09 15:25 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 13:31 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-09 17:58 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 15:22 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship pothead <stonersimpleasthat@gmail.org> - 2019-01-09 23:22 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 19:34 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 18:47 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-09 16:32 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship pothead <stonersimpleasthat@gmail.org> - 2019-01-09 23:19 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-09 20:35 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 18:00 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 08:56 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 09:09 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 08:23 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 09:03 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 08:39 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-10 07:36 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Nobody you know <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-10 09:14 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-10 11:56 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 14:42 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-09 14:18 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 14:35 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 15:52 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 16:09 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 16:26 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 19:32 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-09 18:53 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 19:15 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 19:18 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-09 19:45 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 20:03 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-09 20:38 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-10 11:53 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 09:10 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-10 13:03 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 13:40 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 14:02 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 21:07 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 07:27 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 06:47 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 19:49 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 07:29 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 16:10 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 19:33 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-10 08:07 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 06:31 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 07:26 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 08:47 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 07:51 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-11 12:29 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-11 14:51 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 13:14 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-11 13:56 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 14:17 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-11 22:32 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 14:33 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-11 18:03 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 15:10 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 16:16 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-11 20:35 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 18:39 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 14:40 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 15:03 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 16:51 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-12 10:57 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 14:08 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-12 18:21 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 16:38 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-13 00:42 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-14 07:24 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 06:38 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 07:10 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-14 09:26 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 07:44 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-14 09:45 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 17:16 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship PP <email2@lizards8912m.org> - 2019-01-14 22:20 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 07:23 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 05:47 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 08:43 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 08:16 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 08:35 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 08:46 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 09:57 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 10:35 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-14 12:49 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 11:23 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 12:22 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 12:41 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 13:56 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 14:30 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 14:41 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 11:03 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 11:11 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 11:51 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 13:08 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 12:02 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 12:53 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 13:00 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 13:24 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 14:10 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 14:36 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-15 04:11 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 06:30 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-15 06:47 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 07:04 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-15 08:14 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:45 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 09:09 -0800
My vice is better than yours. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-15 10:05 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 11:08 -0700
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 10:36 -0800
Give me your tired, your poor. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-15 12:18 -0800
Re: Give me your tired, your poor. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 13:19 -0700
Re: Give me your tired, your poor. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 12:50 -0800
Re: Give me your tired, your poor. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 12:34 -0800
Re: Give me your tired, your poor. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 12:46 -0800
Should a rich man ignore a bleeding man knocking on his door ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-15 20:56 -0800
Re: Should a rich man ignore a bleeding man knocking on his door ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 21:24 -0800
Re: Should a rich man ignore a bleeding man knocking on his door ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-16 09:41 +0000
Re: Should a rich man ignore a bleeding man knocking on his door ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 07:07 -0800
Re: Should a rich man ignore a bleeding man knocking on his door ? silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-17 12:02 -0500
Re: Give me your tired, your poor. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 06:57 -0700
Re: Give me your tired, your poor. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 18:28 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 13:37 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 17:46 -0500
Re: My vice is better than yours. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-16 07:23 -0600
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 07:20 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 07:03 -0700
My vice is better than yours. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-15 15:26 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 15:41 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 16:32 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 16:59 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 18:01 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-15 18:50 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-16 07:05 -0600
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 07:05 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-17 07:46 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 08:40 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-17 12:23 -0800
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 13:37 -0800
Who speaks for the poor ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-17 08:52 -0800
Re: Who speaks for the poor ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-17 11:57 -0500
Re: Who speaks for the poor ? silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-17 12:10 -0500
Re: π«π«π«β° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! β°π«π«π« Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" π«π«π«β° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! β°π«π«π«β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Who speaks for the poor ? β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-17 13:00 -0600
Re: π«π«π«β° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! β°π«π«π« Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" π«π«π«β° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! β°π«π«π«β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Who speaks for the poor ? β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 12:24 -0700
Re: Who speaks for the poor ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 09:34 -0800
Re: Who speaks for the poor ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-17 12:36 -0800
Re: Who speaks for the poor ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-17 12:36 -0800
I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-17 13:37 -0800
Re: I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 14:02 -0800
Re: I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-17 14:30 -0800
Re: I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:40 -0800
Re: I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 18:56 -0700
Re: I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-19 04:27 -0800
Re: I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 04:54 -0800
Re: I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 08:08 -0800
Re: I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 20:26 -0800
Re: I'm not the least bit jealous of Warren Buffett. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-17 14:11 -0800
Democrats are rich scofflaws. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-17 08:10 -0800
Re: Democrats are rich scofflaws. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-17 11:18 -0600
Re: My vice is better than yours. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-16 12:11 -0700
Re: My vice is better than yours. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 18:17 -0800
Children of rich parents are the worst tenants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-15 22:14 -0800
Re: Children of rich parents are the worst tenants. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 22:42 -0800
Re: Children of rich parents are the worst tenants. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-16 03:53 -0800
Re: Children of rich parents are the worst tenants. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 04:11 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-16 02:13 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 18:33 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 02:10 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-16 18:43 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 07:51 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-17 16:16 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 09:37 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-17 11:22 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 12:12 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-17 12:47 -0800
A family of 4, living in a 160 SqFt room, shared housing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-17 14:59 -0800
Re: A family of 4, living in a 160 SqFt room, shared housing. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 08:59 -0800
Re: A family of 4, living in a 160 SqFt room, shared housing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 10:09 -0700
Re: A family of 4, living in a 160 SqFt room, shared housing. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 10:39 -0800
Poverty is a vice, wealth is a vice, everything is vice. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-18 09:38 -0800
Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 18:19 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 18:51 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 07:14 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-21 09:51 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 08:06 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 09:04 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 19:14 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-22 07:32 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 13:51 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-22 08:04 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 19:08 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-22 14:50 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 12:58 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 03:16 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 20:04 -0500
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 08:00 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:04 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 09:39 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-23 16:09 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 10:32 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 07:45 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-26 16:23 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-26 16:28 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-26 16:30 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 08:40 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-26 16:44 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 08:48 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-26 19:19 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 12:14 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-26 16:36 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 07:59 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-23 18:23 -0500
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 05:11 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-26 12:13 -0500
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 14:05 -0500
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-22 14:52 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-23 10:03 -0700
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-21 11:00 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 17:55 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-21 22:01 +0000
"To Bork" ( to fuckup ) refers to the "Swedish Chef" Muppet. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-21 15:23 -0800
Re: "To Bork" ( to fuckup ) refers to the "Swedish Chef" Muppet. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-21 23:37 +0000
Etymology of: " This website is borked ". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-21 17:05 -0800
Re: Etymology of: " This website is borked ". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:36 +0000
Re: Etymology of: " This website is borked ". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 20:03 -0800
Re: Etymology of: " This website is borked ". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-22 08:29 +0000
Re: Etymology of: " This website is borked ". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 01:00 -0800
Re: Etymology of: " This website is borked ". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-22 14:30 +0000
Re: Etymology of: " This website is borked ". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 09:25 -0800
Re: Etymology of: " This website is borked ". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-22 08:45 +0000
Re: Etymology of: " This website is borked ". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 06:11 -0800
Re: Etymology of: " This website is borked ". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-22 14:47 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-21 21:59 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 14:19 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-22 07:05 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 05:41 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 13:48 +0000
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 09:15 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 09:35 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 14:37 -0500
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 11:55 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 16:35 -0500
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-22 07:41 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 14:38 -0500
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-23 10:04 -0700
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-23 12:16 -0500
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-23 11:29 -0600
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 14:47 -0800
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-23 18:36 -0500
Re: Illegal immigrants are welcomed here. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 05:11 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-17 21:42 +0000
No one wants to be banished to the woods. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-17 14:05 -0800
Re: No one wants to be banished to the woods. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 04:24 +0000
Re: No one wants to be banished to the woods. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:50 -0800
Re: No one wants to be banished to the woods. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-18 09:16 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-17 14:25 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:41 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-17 23:54 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-18 05:05 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 05:26 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-18 13:50 +0000
Democrats are in the Caribbean, asking for margaritas. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-14 22:53 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:00 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 07:04 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-14 06:57 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 05:04 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 06:54 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 09:01 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 06:22 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 06:45 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 07:04 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 07:57 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 08:05 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-14 08:29 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 08:37 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-14 16:59 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-14 16:59 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship PP <email2@lizards8912m.org> - 2019-01-14 21:42 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-14 08:52 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 16:00 +0100
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 17:04 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 14:12 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship PP <email2@lizards8912m.org> - 2019-01-14 22:17 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 08:04 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 10:06 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 08:10 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 16:47 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 07:15 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 08:56 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 08:14 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 10:11 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 09:35 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 11:10 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:23 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 13:04 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 12:06 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 13:11 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 12:24 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 17:44 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship pothead <stonersimpleasthat@gmail.org> - 2019-01-16 01:11 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 17:30 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 01:55 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-16 05:21 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 21:40 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:07 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 06:49 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 06:41 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 07:07 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 06:41 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-14 09:19 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 07:37 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-14 09:44 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 08:03 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-14 10:19 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 09:43 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-14 16:59 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship PP <email2@lizards8912m.org> - 2019-01-14 21:41 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 17:24 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-14 17:10 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 07:24 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 08:58 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 06:33 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 00:10 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 17:16 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-14 17:11 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 07:23 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 05:32 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 09:14 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 17:11 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 07:22 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 08:58 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 08:18 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 06:45 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 10:33 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 07:35 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 09:37 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 11:10 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:53 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 07:05 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 10:13 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 07:07 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-14 16:59 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 09:30 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 11:19 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 16:42 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 15:36 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 19:23 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 17:45 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-14 20:08 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 20:41 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-14 17:12 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 00:02 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 10:33 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 13:08 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 12:29 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 10:41 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 13:06 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 07:01 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 17:45 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-16 06:50 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-16 09:16 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 06:48 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-15 12:37 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-15 17:46 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 12:58 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 14:44 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 16:29 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 15:50 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-12 06:40 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-12 12:45 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 12:55 -0800
To properly document it, you'd need a better wall, with cameras. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-14 06:57 -0800
Re: To properly document it, you'd need a better wall, with cameras. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 17:51 -0500
See no vice, hear no corruption, speak no evil. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-14 06:23 -0800
Re: See no vice, hear no corruption, speak no evil. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 06:45 -0800
Re: See no vice, hear no corruption, speak no evil. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-14 16:59 +0000
Re: See no vice, hear no corruption, speak no evil. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 10:16 -0800
Re: See no vice, hear no corruption, speak no evil. PP <email2@lizards8912m.org> - 2019-01-14 21:37 +0000
Re: See no vice, hear no corruption, speak no evil. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-14 11:01 -0500
Re: See no vice, hear no corruption, speak no evil. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 17:38 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 19:37 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 19:44 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-09 12:09 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-09 11:23 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-09 12:46 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 10:16 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 10:26 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 09:02 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 19:47 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-09 16:02 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 08:24 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-09 10:57 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 19:46 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 08:51 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-09 12:07 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 09:54 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 09:00 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 08:07 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 07:49 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 09:07 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 19:51 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 19:02 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-09 12:04 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 19:55 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-10 09:55 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 07:20 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-10 16:29 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 16:34 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-11 05:33 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-11 15:40 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-11 09:48 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-11 16:01 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-11 10:15 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-11 17:49 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 17:12 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 16:22 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 16:38 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-12 13:40 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-12 11:12 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 13:53 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 14:32 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 02:33 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 18:57 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-13 08:51 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 16:06 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-13 12:44 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-13 12:27 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 13:04 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 13:38 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-13 16:51 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 16:47 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 07:41 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-13 12:47 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 10:32 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 18:57 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-13 12:40 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-13 19:01 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-13 12:45 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 14:56 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 00:53 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 07:25 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 08:17 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-11 12:14 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 10:07 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 13:03 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-12 13:40 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 12:28 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-12 16:24 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 14:32 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 14:48 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-12 18:24 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-13 00:42 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 17:09 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 17:20 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-10 12:00 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-10 11:32 -0600
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-10 13:32 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 14:40 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 14:21 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-11 05:35 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 14:51 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 15:23 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-11 05:34 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 03:20 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 08:26 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 07:46 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 14:22 -0700
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 08:36 -0800
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-09 20:26 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-01-09 21:11 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-09 21:14 +0000
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-09 16:31 -0500
Re: Serbia is again dictatorship Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 09:03 -0700
Fake Snit News Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 14:32 -0800
Page 23 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 15:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sz0bv03ga.ag3au4@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #483856 |
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>> >>>>>> We have returned to 90es and dictatorship. Media darkness rules Serbia. >>>>>> Corruption, mafia and party ;( >>>>>> There are 600000 members of ruling party, all scam is there. >>>>> >>>>> Don't worry Melzzzzz, you might have company fairly soon, if Trump has his >>>>> way. >>>>> >>>>> "National Emergency!!!!!!" >>>>> >>>>> (Trump's the national emergency). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, he's a "national emergency" because he wants the border wall that >>>> Obama, Hillary, Schumer, and other prominent Democrats voted to fund >>>> not that long ago. Democrats don't mind sending $50 billion to other >>>> countries in part to fund *their* border walls (which for some reason >>>> are not "immoral"), but $5 billion for a wall to stop the 2000+ per day >>>> illegal border crossings is too expensive and "immoral." >>> >>> Fake news. >>> >>> https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2019/jan/09/donald-trump/trump-democrats-reverse-border-wall-position/ >>> >>> We rate this statement Mostly False. >>> >> >> Nice Fake News strawman from politifact. Supporting a physical barrier >> is supporting a physical barrier. And the Dems mentioned all supported >> a physical barrier in the past. Now they don't. > > You mean, they don't want to spend large amounts of money TODAY to create a > mostly ineffective barrier How is a wall, or any barrier, less effective than nothing at all? Don't say "muh drones," because nothing about a wall precludes use of additional technology. > that is simply a Trump monument that may end up > costing far more than he's whining about right now. > >>> Fake News. You're too credulous. >> >> From your brainwashed perspective, I'm sure you see it that way. > > Oh, since I take the trouble to look at alternative source, I am > brainwashed? > > Mmmmmmkay. > What "alternative source"? https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/2/border-patrol-agents-back-trump-wall-survey-finds/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 09:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <7heh3e1md8dh05l8v7mgfps0a295as1hit@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #483904 |
owl wrote: >https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/2/border-patrol-agents-back-trump-wall-survey-finds/ No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) -- 'Seen in Adobe Photoshop: "This application does not support the editing of banknote images... For more information...[blah, blah], go to: http://www.rulesforuse.org/pub/index.php No such restriction from illegal counterfeiting in GIMP.' - lying asshole "-hh", implying that FOSS is less "moral", and FOSS users more likely to break the law.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 16:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ad0ab003ga.3h@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #483906 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > owl wrote: > >>https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/2/border-patrol-agents-back-trump-wall-survey-finds/ > > No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) > Among the Border Patrol agents?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 10:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <4tfh3eh899hq30cqgl6k6dj4lmv1o6r57s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #483908 |
owl wrote: >chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) > >Among the Border Patrol agents? Yes. I was being sarcastic. Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they are too close to the situation to have an objective view. Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. -- "By definition it's hobbyware, since most of it is created by unpaid developers in their spare time, for fun." - Dumfsck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 17:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9zxfvb0093t.a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #483910 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > owl wrote: > >>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) >> >>Among the Border Patrol agents? > > Yes. I was being sarcastic. > > Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they > are too close to the situation to have an objective view. > > Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. > It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol chief believes they need a wall.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 17:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9spnbFqb68U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #483932 |
On 1/11/19 10:49 AM, owl wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> owl wrote: >> >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) >>> >>> Among the Border Patrol agents? >> >> Yes. I was being sarcastic. >> >> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they >> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. >> >> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. >> > > It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol > chief believes they need a wall. > Cite. And do you mean the physical barrier accepted by the left or Trump's symbolic wall? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 16:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2f7f60b6-f6b7-4bf0-aa51-a4a8c7a13645@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #483990 |
On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 5:12:30 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 1/11/19 10:49 AM, owl wrote: > > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> owl wrote: > >> > >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) > >>> > >>> Among the Border Patrol agents? > >> > >> Yes. I was being sarcastic. > >> > >> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they > >> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. > >> > >> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. > >> > > > > It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol > > chief believes they need a wall. > > > > Cite. And do you mean the physical barrier accepted by the left or > Trump's symbolic wall? > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Gee, no on saw more forgeries coming. LOL! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.28 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWJpfjAAoJEC03b6bOr/+drC0P/RZBxcLK8eFZ7QUKjlqJRqfj 66udasAYnovhi+C1bpBxXZIm8Xxg2+JDdVoMfw/d+5R8+KpEXpxK+4y9GB8NuBBz 98+LuNNIus0cXJ6goCyKZj5FUajHYIhgoEAb+O8F0pYMcqv08R39IddgVEQCasDZ 9QPXlQco0QOSD49BArlDa7qgwi17Rs2zkYnw27jEIVEuYlfhqj2T7Mcirwby4JD3 +1Geq5kCdeCtMG+z6gAdth0akrSMlYLAnixbYolEFm6wtg7DW2BrwVo7NTY8Zuy1 UjRrn8JAoHrCec82HulrBBEXC/dhti2SIszDnt1GnZSTB33p1plQgklUmmqN8Qvu To/TAz07YWAeUHcYSyHzmJuVbL0r9emcQD/AfB8CxAhh+p5F5kc2hfwAOmJ4cGpV +kIqUp7N1UXqSOXnFyxYz4HJv9/c0UPNXSY2QDPmaWd7AFrB80BcOw2yVS30jQwo QhBtvoj2t/FJi/G7KnIpGYl3ZFy7QxtNL6PnPW5y46EjzDbNEnMbETTxAzI24QGw x5xgyhdiyRnpCvyHFd21d09bYOrBHH6qe3NMVTRBPjh1MUaw1E8WhQo916Zvk4jz pD23EIt9uk79a2aD+EbC/vZHLPGTqlbI1bmYV5KlzJusIO2i939Cs/AhYcdM8mEQ WqdC0S1YIC7GfYk7riFe =F3OP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 16:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e2ab1d9a-d92e-44b1-bbd2-5aee28358927@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #483990 |
On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 5:12:30 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 1/11/19 10:49 AM, owl wrote: > > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> owl wrote: > >> > >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) > >>> > >>> Among the Border Patrol agents? > >> > >> Yes. I was being sarcastic. > >> > >> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they > >> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. > >> > >> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. > >> > > > > It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol > > chief believes they need a wall. > > > > Cite. And do you mean the physical barrier accepted by the left or > Trump's symbolic wall? > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Lines of text containing your own words reflected in a funhouse mirror. Linux offers the least choice. That is the problem 'today' and less experienced instructors don't stand a chance; people from smarter generations (~50 or so) *should* know better than to fall for the New World agenda. Proof Sandman accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png. Geeeejus! How did Rudy Canoza get _so_ egotistical he believes everything is about himself?? Rudy Canoza has yet to show how any Linux program does anything above the basics on Linux. Steven Petruzzellis obviously has an abundance of knowledge to teach and he could learn to provide screencasts to help others. Of course this is I think the least appropriate venue for doing that because a large part of what he will get back is whining, trickery and other poppycock. -- Best CMS Solution of 2017!! http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding http://www.5z8.info/creditscore_g7f8du_launchexe Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 13:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q1ddl0$kou$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #483932 |
owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> owl wrote:
>>
>>>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes)
>>>
>>>Among the Border Patrol agents?
>>
>> Yes. I was being sarcastic.
>>
>> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they
>> are too close to the situation to have an objective view.
>>
>> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches.
>
> It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol
> chief believes they need a wall.
Depends where they are. Talk to Texas.
Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility.
Except to Trump, who views it as a:
- Campaign promise to his dumbfuck base.
- A monument to himself.
- A sop to certain conservative pundits, who would otherwise call him
names.
I wonder how those whose property will be appropriated will feel about it.
--
For courage mounteth with occasion.
-- William Shakespeare, "King John"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 11:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <688704c5-5e00-4d95-b7e2-d41979b078af@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484080 |
On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 2:02:58 PM UTC-5, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > [...] > > Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. The utility isn't as bad as one might think, because these aren't an anti- pedestrian barrier, but to stop vehicles. They're located in regions where there's lots of empty land that would take a long time to cross on foot. And there's also overwatch...they watch the trespassers cross, but then wait for them to go through the effort of crossing "50 miles of desert" and simply wait for them out to the highway where they're then intercepted. This approach is cheaper as it requires a lot less manpower than Trump's idea of a gulag wall with a 24/7 manned guard tower every 328 feet. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 13:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <908f7f09-a973-4b4f-bfff-c22ff69502a1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484085 |
On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 12:12:51 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 2:02:58 PM UTC-5, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > > [...] > > > > Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. > > The utility isn't as bad as one might think, because these aren't an anti- > pedestrian barrier, but to stop vehicles. They're located in regions where > there's lots of empty land that would take a long time to cross on foot. And, as we all know, drug czars and those involved in human trafficking wouldn't dare use a vehicle to meet with someone else who has a vehicle on the other side to do their business (while a border agent takes a 'paid' break) <eyeroll>. > And there's also overwatch...they watch the trespassers cross, but then > wait for them to go through the effort of crossing "50 miles of desert" and > simply wait for them out to the highway where they're then intercepted. You have it all worked out, screw what border patrol is telling us! You know you're insane, right? > This approach is cheaper as it requires a lot less manpower than Trump's > idea of a gulag wall with a 24/7 manned guard tower every 328 feet. You uber leftists are so gullible, opportunists like Trump see you coming a mile away.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 14:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <35d5a466-9cba-474b-9356-909b1612d6c9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484109 |
On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 2:53:13 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 12:12:51 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > > On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 2:02:58 PM UTC-5, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. > > > > The utility isn't as bad as one might think, because these aren't an anti- > > pedestrian barrier, but to stop vehicles. They're located in regions where > > there's lots of empty land that would take a long time to cross on foot. > > And, as we all know, drug czars and those involved in human > trafficking wouldn't dare use a vehicle to meet with someone > else who has a vehicle on the other side to do their business > (while a border agent takes a 'paid' break) <eyeroll>. > > > And there's also overwatch...they watch the trespassers cross, but then > > wait for them to go through the effort of crossing "50 miles of desert" and > > simply wait for them out to the highway where they're then intercepted. > > You have it all worked out, screw what border patrol is telling us! > You know you're insane, right? > > > This approach is cheaper as it requires a lot less manpower than Trump's > > idea of a gulag wall with a 24/7 manned guard tower every 328 feet. > > You uber leftists are so gullible, opportunists like Trump see > you coming a mile away. Not only did Klaus Schadenfreude's question not touch on the "DE", it has _nothing_ to do with Mac. bigdog should stop mixing red and blue pills ;) I'm getting false positives in my kill filter. I'm guessing the sock frenzy whackadoodle is proving the advocates right again. Drives the trolls crazy when they do not get attention. I am an absolute supporter of Mac, because that's where all the exciting modernization is happening. bigdog proved himself to be a sophist by having the pretense to not speak to Klaus Schadenfreude via blatantly broadcasting 'Into the bin with you!' and then assaulting him again by means of another poster. bigdog's cut down on the endless egotistical, idiotic posts he used to knock off but he's certainly unchanged in the honesty dept. He just uses shills more now to generate those threads. Ha! Right, bigdog is trying to market an HTML reference, which anyone can get for free. If he could stop being so ignorant he'd understand how clueless he proves himself to be ;) I thought showing him a little generosity might help the situation. It did not. -- Get Rich Slow http://www.5z8.info/hackwebcam_e9z2tw_friendster-of-sex https://youtu.be/Z5wo5aE7MUk https://redd.it/6sfhq6 Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 02:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q1e80s$g8m$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #484080 |
On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> owl wrote: >>> >>>>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) >>>> >>>>Among the Border Patrol agents? >>> >>> Yes. I was being sarcastic. >>> >>> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they >>> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. >>> >>> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. >> >> It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol >> chief believes they need a wall. > > Depends where they are. Talk to Texas. > > Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. > Except to Trump, who views it as a: > > - Campaign promise to his dumbfuck base. > - A monument to himself. > - A sop to certain conservative pundits, who would otherwise call him > names. > > I wonder how those whose property will be appropriated will feel about it. The Democrats voted for a border wall. They seem to forget that. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 18:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <86bee56f-ddb0-46ea-ba23-c021cc6038b7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484136 |
On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 7:33:02 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote: > On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > > owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>> owl wrote: > >>> > >>>>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) > >>>> > >>>>Among the Border Patrol agents? > >>> > >>> Yes. I was being sarcastic. > >>> > >>> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they > >>> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. > >>> > >>> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. > >> > >> It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol > >> chief believes they need a wall. > > > > Depends where they are. Talk to Texas. > > > > Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. > > Except to Trump, who views it as a: > > > > - Campaign promise to his dumbfuck base. > > - A monument to himself. > > - A sop to certain conservative pundits, who would otherwise call him > > names. > > > > I wonder how those whose property will be appropriated will feel about it. > > The Democrats voted for a border wall. They seem to forget that. > > -- > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux. I noted examples of Steven 'The Moron' Petruzzellis trolling multiple groups, failing to rise up and instead putting others down, etc. His response: to claim I am Steven 'The Moron' Petruzzellis. Why would you want to cap any applications on GNU/Linux to what can be done on commercial OSs? His "troubleshooting abilities" blinded him to a module he needs that is already built into Gnome. The only thing not working here is Steven 'The Moron' Petruzzellis. <giggle> Show an example of a profitable company that has earned its fortune by not giving a damn about its customers and services. You hacked it and did extensive testing and your "amazing brain powers" lead you to that verdict, how amazing. - Top Ten Ways Steven 'The Moron' Petruzzellis Trolls https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0 Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | silverslimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 08:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <phgm3edv83jdb662ssu4e82b9mr47f1ntd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #484136 |
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 02:33:00 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> owl wrote: >>>> >>>>>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) >>>>> >>>>>Among the Border Patrol agents? >>>> >>>> Yes. I was being sarcastic. >>>> >>>> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they >>>> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. >>>> >>>> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. >>> >>> It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol >>> chief believes they need a wall. >> >> Depends where they are. Talk to Texas. >> >> Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. >> Except to Trump, who views it as a: >> >> - Campaign promise to his dumbfuck base. >> - A monument to himself. >> - A sop to certain conservative pundits, who would otherwise call him >> names. >> >> I wonder how those whose property will be appropriated will feel about it. > >The Democrats voted for a border wall. They seem to forget that. It's not the Democrats who forgot it; it's the low-IQ, naive imbeciles who voted for them. I assure you that the Democrats themselves are fully aware of their corruption, lies and hypocrisy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 16:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q1fnmf$oub$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #484189 |
On 2019-01-13, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 02:33:00 -0000 (UTC), RonB ><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) >>>>>> >>>>>>Among the Border Patrol agents? >>>>> >>>>> Yes. I was being sarcastic. >>>>> >>>>> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they >>>>> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. >>>>> >>>>> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. >>>> >>>> It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol >>>> chief believes they need a wall. >>> >>> Depends where they are. Talk to Texas. >>> >>> Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. >>> Except to Trump, who views it as a: >>> >>> - Campaign promise to his dumbfuck base. >>> - A monument to himself. >>> - A sop to certain conservative pundits, who would otherwise call him >>> names. >>> >>> I wonder how those whose property will be appropriated will feel about it. >> >>The Democrats voted for a border wall. They seem to forget that. > > It's not the Democrats who forgot it; it's the low-IQ, naive imbeciles > who voted for them. I assure you that the Democrats themselves are > fully aware of their corruption, lies and hypocrisy. It's not just Democrats, it's politicians in general. But I admit that Democrats have taken screeching hypocrisy to a new level in the last couple of years. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 12:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ga1iotFs2jjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #484208 |
On 1/13/19 9:06 AM, RonB wrote: > On 2019-01-13, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 02:33:00 -0000 (UTC), RonB >> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Among the Border Patrol agents? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. I was being sarcastic. >>>>>> >>>>>> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they >>>>>> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. >>>>>> >>>>>> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. >>>>> >>>>> It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol >>>>> chief believes they need a wall. >>>> >>>> Depends where they are. Talk to Texas. >>>> >>>> Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. >>>> Except to Trump, who views it as a: >>>> >>>> - Campaign promise to his dumbfuck base. >>>> - A monument to himself. >>>> - A sop to certain conservative pundits, who would otherwise call him >>>> names. >>>> >>>> I wonder how those whose property will be appropriated will feel about it. >>> >>> The Democrats voted for a border wall. They seem to forget that. >> >> It's not the Democrats who forgot it; it's the low-IQ, naive imbeciles >> who voted for them. I assure you that the Democrats themselves are >> fully aware of their corruption, lies and hypocrisy. > > It's not just Democrats, it's politicians in general. But I admit that > Democrats have taken screeching hypocrisy to a new level in the last couple > of years. > What could be worse than Trump -- even on just the wall he is all over the place. Who will pay: Mexico. The US (and he will shut down the government to get it). It will pay for itself. What will it be made of? Concrete and rebar. Steel beams. Cheese cloth might be next. Where will it be. Just where needed (which is where we already have a wall!). Across the whole border. Nobody knows. How much will it cost? 5.7 Billion. $150 billion. How are we going to handle the risk to over 100 endangered species. Um, no answer. Whose fault is the shut down? His and he is happy to take that. The Democrats. On and on and on and on. And this is just about the wall. Now we can ask him who is going to pay for his massive tax cuts for the wealthy. The answer is we ALL are... but he will never say that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 12:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ga1hp5FrpjpU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #484189 |
On 1/13/19 6:51 AM, silverslimer wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 02:33:00 -0000 (UTC), RonB > <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) >>>>>> >>>>>> Among the Border Patrol agents? >>>>> >>>>> Yes. I was being sarcastic. >>>>> >>>>> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they >>>>> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. >>>>> >>>>> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. >>>> >>>> It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol >>>> chief believes they need a wall. >>> >>> Depends where they are. Talk to Texas. >>> >>> Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. >>> Except to Trump, who views it as a: >>> >>> - Campaign promise to his dumbfuck base. >>> - A monument to himself. >>> - A sop to certain conservative pundits, who would otherwise call him >>> names. >>> >>> I wonder how those whose property will be appropriated will feel about it. >> >> The Democrats voted for a border wall. They seem to forget that. > > It's not the Democrats who forgot it; it's the low-IQ, naive imbeciles > who voted for them. I assure you that the Democrats themselves are > fully aware of their corruption, lies and hypocrisy. > On average, Liberals have higher IQs than do Conservatives. With that said, NOBODY is suggesting we do away with the physical barriers we have on our southern border, nor is anyone suggesting we should not improve them where needed. Nor are they suggesting we not improve security at check points. To the contrary the Democrats are promoting such things. This does not mean they back Trump's massively expensive and unfunded ego trip of a wall, nor do they back the threatening of 100+ endangered species as Trump and his supporters do. What you have done is buy into a cult of personality and have NO clue what the actual issues are. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 13:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56b4e3b3-1bea-49ed-9d6e-41da3ae77bfe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484189 |
On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 6:51:33 AM UTC-7, silverslimer wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 02:33:00 -0000 (UTC), RonB > <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > >> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> > >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>> owl wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) > >>>>> > >>>>>Among the Border Patrol agents? > >>>> > >>>> Yes. I was being sarcastic. > >>>> > >>>> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they > >>>> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. > >>>> > >>>> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. > >>> > >>> It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol > >>> chief believes they need a wall. > >> > >> Depends where they are. Talk to Texas. > >> > >> Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. > >> Except to Trump, who views it as a: > >> > >> - Campaign promise to his dumbfuck base. > >> - A monument to himself. > >> - A sop to certain conservative pundits, who would otherwise call him > >> names. > >> > >> I wonder how those whose property will be appropriated will feel about it. > > > >The Democrats voted for a border wall. They seem to forget that. > > It's not the Democrats who forgot it; it's the low-IQ, naive imbeciles > who voted for them. I assure you that the Democrats themselves are > fully aware of their corruption, lies and hypocrisy. βWe simply cannot allow people to pour into the U.S., undetected, undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently, lawfully to become immigrants in this countryβ - Barack Obama Any minute now, someone claiming to be a "liberal" will be along to explain why Obama's position here is "wrong", and it'll go something like this: That's when we had too many coming, now that we don't have as many it's the "wrong" position to take. In other words they don't give a f*ck about who jumps the line, screw the people who are in the line... and this makes "sense" for only one reason, because people claiming to be a "liberal" need it to make sense and you're not allowed to question their brand of "logic"; dare and you'll be targeted for social/financial extermination. Another Obama statement: "Thatβs why we need to start by giving agencies charged with border security new technology, new facilities, and more people to stop, process and deport illegal immigrants. Having said that, securing the borders alone does not solve immigration management. Weβre going to have to better manage legal immigration in order to end illegal immigration." Catch that: "...securing the borders alone..."? That *necessarily* underscores BO's belief to *also* secure the border as part of a solution where he recognizes we're having issues WRT to "immigration management", with the end goal to "stop, process and deport illegal immigrants" (whom he recognizes as people that "disrespect the rule of law"... as quoted below). "The American people are a welcoming and generous people. But those who enter our country illegally, and those who employ them, disrespect the rule of law. And because we live in an age where terrorists are challenging our borders, we simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked. Americans are right to demand better border security and better enforcement of the immigration laws." - Barack Obama The 'liberal' outlook: If you don't let people jump the line, screwing over those who waited their turn, you're not "welcoming and generous".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 13:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5845efda-89c3-466d-81d8-71e13222365e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484263 |
On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 2:04:10 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 6:51:33 AM UTC-7, silverslimer wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 02:33:00 -0000 (UTC), RonB > > <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > > >> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > >> > > >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > >>>> owl wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> No right-wingers there... (rolling eyes) > > >>>>> > > >>>>>Among the Border Patrol agents? > > >>>> > > >>>> Yes. I was being sarcastic. > > >>>> > > >>>> Even besides the probablity that, as a group, they lean right, they > > >>>> are too close to the situation to have an objective view. > > >>>> > > >>>> Military policy should not be made by the grunts in the trenches. > > >>> > > >>> It's more than the "grunts." Even Obama's former border patrol > > >>> chief believes they need a wall. > > >> > > >> Depends where they are. Talk to Texas. > > >> > > >> Oh, and it's not a wall. It's sections of "fencing", of doubtful utility. > > >> Except to Trump, who views it as a: > > >> > > >> - Campaign promise to his dumbfuck base. > > >> - A monument to himself. > > >> - A sop to certain conservative pundits, who would otherwise call him > > >> names. > > >> > > >> I wonder how those whose property will be appropriated will feel about it. > > > > > >The Democrats voted for a border wall. They seem to forget that. > > > > It's not the Democrats who forgot it; it's the low-IQ, naive imbeciles > > who voted for them. I assure you that the Democrats themselves are > > fully aware of their corruption, lies and hypocrisy. > > βWe simply cannot allow people to pour into the U.S., undetected, > undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people > who are waiting patiently, diligently, lawfully to become immigrants > in this countryβ - Barack Obama > > Any minute now, someone claiming to be a "liberal" will be along to > explain why Obama's position here is "wrong", and it'll go something > like this: > > That's when we had too many coming, now that we don't have as > many it's the "wrong" position to take. > > In other words they don't give a f*ck about who jumps the line, screw > the people who are in the line... and this makes "sense" for only one > reason, because people claiming to be a "liberal" need it to make sense > and you're not allowed to question their brand of "logic"; dare and you'll > be targeted for social/financial extermination. > > Another Obama statement: > > "Thatβs why we need to start by giving agencies charged with border > security new technology, new facilities, and more people to stop, > process and deport illegal immigrants. Having said that, securing the > borders alone does not solve immigration management. Weβre going > to have to better manage legal immigration in order to end illegal > immigration." > > Catch that: "...securing the borders alone..."? > > That *necessarily* underscores BO's belief to *also* secure the border > as part of a solution where he recognizes we're having issues WRT to > "immigration management", with the end goal to "stop, process and > deport illegal immigrants" (whom he recognizes as people that > "disrespect the rule of law"... as quoted below). > > > "The American people are a welcoming and generous people. But those > who enter our country illegally, and those who employ them, disrespect > the rule of law. And because we live in an age where terrorists are > challenging our borders, we simply cannot allow people to pour into the > United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked. Americans > are right to demand better border security and better enforcement of > the immigration laws." - Barack Obama > > The 'liberal' outlook: If you don't let people jump the line, screwing over > those who waited their turn, you're not "welcoming and generous". I'd answer Sandman directly but he is a fool who takes things out of context to implement his aspiration to call everyone a con artist. You ran it and took it for a test drive and your "intuitions" lead you to that opinion, did they? I think the person you are thinking of is in my kill file. Sandman's actions are in fact thoroughly deceitful. There can be no question that as soon as any pardoned 'plonked person' does one thing to frighten the poor namby-pamby's feelings that they'll be blocked again. Lines of text containing blips and bloops. Sandman is trying (with "all they have") to project their crap onto Just Wondering. For years Sandman has pressed the idea that Just Wondering needs 'evidence' to point out all his forgeries. The fact is that nobody needs any proof to do that. So Sandman pulls this ridiculous circus crap in an incompetent bid to 'boost' the idea that Just Wondering is like him. -- This broke the Internet https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ http://www.5z8.info/gruesome-gunshot-wounds_t5z0au_cockdock.gif https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 23 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web