Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #470630 > unrolled thread

Popular politician's rowdy teen years

Started byRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
First post2018-10-04 17:17 +0000
Last post2018-10-14 07:28 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 214 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:17 +0000
    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-05 15:48 -0700
    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 17:32 -0700
    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 19:37 -0700
      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 07:23 -0700
        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 17:00 -0700
    Popular politician's rowdy teen years -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-06 05:07 -0700
      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 05:32 -0700
      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 09:13 -0700
        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-06 16:49 +0000
        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-07 14:15 -0700
          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 14:33 -0700
            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 08:04 -0700
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 23:58 -0700
        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-08 07:17 -0500
          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 05:43 -0700
          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-08 15:06 -0700
          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 01:15 +0000
            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 18:41 -0700
            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-12 07:47 -0400
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-12 14:14 +0200
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 05:43 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:40 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:41 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 12:13 +0200
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:59 -0400
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-13 04:14 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 14:02 +0200
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 05:21 -0700
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-13 13:48 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 14:13 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-13 18:45 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:03 -0700
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 21:12 -0700
                            Who isn't "owned", you ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-13 20:20 -0700
                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-13 23:51 -0400
                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 21:43 -0700
                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:21 -0400
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 08:51 -0700
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 10:40 -0700
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 12:12 -0400
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 11:25 -0500
                                      Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 12:46 -0400
                                        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 12:01 -0500
                                          Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 14:10 -0400
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:22 -0500
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:27 -0700
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:42 -0700
                                        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 13:43 -0400
                                          Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:25 -0500
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:07 -0400
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 13:32 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 22:36 +0200
                                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:43 -0400
                                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 14:03 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:46 -0400
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 06:48 -0500
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 05:24 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:10 -0400
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 09:39 -0700
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-15 13:39 -0400
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 10:56 -0700
                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 20:56 -0700
                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 07:26 -0700
                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 09:06 -0700
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-14 10:14 -0700
                                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 10:15 -0700
                                    Just an opinion pieces written by a crack pot Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:18 -0700
                                      Re: Just an opinion pieces written by a crack pot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 11:47 -0700
                                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:52 -0700
                                      Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 11:15 -0700
                                      Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 12:03 -0700
                                        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 12:34 -0700
                                        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:21 -0700
                                          Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:37 -0700
                                          Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 15:07 -0700
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 15:30 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 16:45 -0700
                                              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-14 19:44 -0700
                                            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 00:46 +0200
                                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-14 10:05 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-14 10:09 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:13 +0000
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 12:16 -0400
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 09:32 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:52 +0000
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:56 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 11:20 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:40 -0400
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 12:11 +0200
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 10:41 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 08:30 -0700
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:59 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:09 +0000
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 07:52 -0500
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 10:59 -0400
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 08:20 -0700
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-12 08:36 -0500
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:46 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 18:56 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 19:12 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:42 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 03:46 -0700
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:18 +0000
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 12:23 -0400
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:55 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:44 +0200
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 05:21 -0400
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 03:08 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 05:22 -0400
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 08:26 -0400
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 05:44 -0700
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 09:02 -0400
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 07:18 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:26 +0000
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 16:24 +0200
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 07:49 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 11:46 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 09:07 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:28 +0000
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 14:26 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 12:15 -0700
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-15 21:32 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 19:00 -0700
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 08:10 +0200
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 23:40 -0700
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-16 11:08 -0400
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:23 +0000
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 14:14 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:29 -0500
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 20:41 +0200
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 14:33 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 14:10 -0500
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:13 +0000
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 20:20 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:33 +0000
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 21:16 -0400
                                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 20:02 -0700
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 01:29 -0700
                                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:40 -0700
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:47 -0700
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-16 17:58 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:51 -0700
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:07 -0700
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 06:51 -0500
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-16 12:20 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 12:58 -0500
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:10 -0700
                                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 13:23 -0500
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:35 -0700
                                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 13:37 -0500
                                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:23 -0700
                                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 20:31 -0700
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 13:12 -0700
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:23 -0700
                                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-16 18:47 -0400
                                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:52 -0700
                                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 21:48 -0700
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:08 -0400
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:21 -0700
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:08 -0400
                              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:11 +0000
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 20:18 -0400
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:30 +0000
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 21:12 -0400
                                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:43 -0700
                                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:47 -0700
                                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 08:38 -0700
                                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:13 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:22 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 07:42 -0500
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 08:52 -0400
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:44 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:13 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 16:51 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 14:47 -0700
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:39 +0000
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 06:55 +0200
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 22:18 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:49 -0400
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 06:03 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:43 +0000
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:54 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 05:16 -0400
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:20 +0000
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 14:31 -0400
                            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:15 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:41 +0000
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 09:48 -0700
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 15:16 -0400
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 12:27 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:40 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:48 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:56 -0700
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 15:00 -0700
                          Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 17:37 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 10:34 -0400
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 16:35 +0200
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 11:00 -0400
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:59 -0700
                      Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:58 -0500
                        Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 12:30 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:49 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-24 21:18 -0400
                    Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-25 08:32 -0400
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 11:04 -0700
            Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:26 -0700
              Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-12 21:47 +0200
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 15:33 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 17:04 -0700
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:22 -0700
                Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:48 +0000
                  Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 11:03 -0700
    RonB is an Ass.  Enough said ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 07:28 -0700

Page 1 of 11  [1] 2 3 … 11  Next page →


#470630 — Popular politician's rowdy teen years

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-04 17:17 +0000
SubjectPopular politician's rowdy teen years
Message-ID<pp5hue$k8l$2@dont-email.me>
"I was a thug for a big part of my growing up,..."

"I got into fights. I drank and did — and consumed substances that weren't 
always legal."

"I might have drank a six-pack in an hour before going back to class, things 
like that."

And he admits to using cocaine and pot.

His name? Barack Obama.

And nary a peep from self-righteous, hypocritical Democrats.

https://tinyurl.com/y8v3rnvw 

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#470887

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-10-05 15:48 -0700
Message-ID<g1q81tFj8vU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#470630
On 10/4/18 10:17 AM, RonB wrote:
> "I was a thug for a big part of my growing up,..."
> 
> "I got into fights. I drank and did — and consumed substances that weren't
> always legal."
> 
> "I might have drank a six-pack in an hour before going back to class, things
> like that."
> 
> And he admits to using cocaine and pot.
> 
> His name? Barack Obama.
> 
> And nary a peep from self-righteous, hypocritical Democrats.
> 
> https://tinyurl.com/y8v3rnvw
> 

None of that includes sexual harassment, extreme bias, or being unfit 
for the job he did. Way to miss the point!

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#470896

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-05 17:32 -0700
Message-ID<fac6e6f8-49c9-4c8d-9009-06541f5ddf1f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#470630
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 10:17:04 AM UTC-7, RonB wrote:
> "I was a thug for a big part of my growing up,..."
> 
> "I got into fights. I drank and did — and consumed substances that weren't 
> always legal."
> 
> "I might have drank a six-pack in an hour before going back to class, things 
> like that."
> 
> And he admits to using cocaine and pot.
> 
> His name? Barack Obama.
> 
> And nary a peep from self-righteous, hypocritical Democrats.
> 
> https://tinyurl.com/y8v3rnvw 
> 
> -- 
> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.



Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll

Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is single, broke and has no skills. He blames Silver "Christ Hater" Slimer for his loss of his wife and girlfriend. Steven is jealous of what Silver "Christ Hater" Slimer has and in a narcissistic rage repeatedly works to take it away from him. For over 10 years he has failed at even this. Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is an utter failure in life.

Of his online life Steven says

    I've been booted off by past providers before because people
    complain about me and all my bullshit. I don't want to lose my ISP
    *again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually
    search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted
    from.
    
Some examples where Steven has been booted

X10 Hosting booted Steven for inappropriate activity
http://tinyurl.com/z92qmz4

Comcast booted Steven for inappropriate activity 
http://tinyurl.com/h75nh9l

FreeHostingEU booted Steven for copyright infringement http://devsite.eu.pn

AwardSpace (atwebpages.com) booted Steven for breaking terms of service
http://demsites.atwebpages.com/pokeman

Imgur took down an image for breaking terms of service http://imgur.com/yv2XppE

Had a GigaNews account which was removed for harassing Silver "Christ Hater" Slimer

Stopped posting from his fretwizzen Google account since shortly after I complained. Seems he lost that too.

His wife booted Steven to the curb for cheating on her


    
Only site Steven Petruzzellis has pointed to that has ever been available
http://web.archive.org/web/20161019062351/http://www.oldneighborhoodrestaurant.net/
https://goo.gl/DMno6J

Made by the Go Daddy Website builder and is utter crap. Later he denied he said he was merely taking credit for someone else's work but Steven is the contact person http://tinyurl.com/hcw6dul
http://web.archive.org/web/20161202192456/http://www.reservationdiary.eu/eng/reservation/d76d1156-e9f7-43c1-b77b-b07189857820

He also bragged he was working on an update and showed it here https://vid.me/u6RK

The business still failed.

He likely went to the Go Daddy Website Builder after he failed to get WordPress installed.

https://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic/13879


This is why Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll attacks Silver "Christ Hater" Slimer. 


Steven Petruzzellis was is divorced because his wife caught him screwing another woman.

Silver "Christ Hater" Slimer is married and by all appearances happily so. 
He never complains about his wife in COLA.


Steven Petruzzellis is living on charity of a friend in a single room.

Silver "Christ Hater" Slimer does not live in a mansion or even a high end home but has a house and a yard.


Steven Petruzzellis has two kids but no respect. He repeatedly called Ryan his "little screwup" and refers to his son Steve as a "dick" and worse. He says at least one of them likely hacked his computer and is a "mentally deficient child." He mocks his possible future daughter-in-law as someone who takes too many selfies and is focused only on herself

Silver "Christ Hater" Slimer has two kids (or more) and never speaks poorly of them in public. 
No reason to think they are not a happy family.


Steven Petruzzellis claims to be a stay at home dad who pays thousands of dollars for day care. Steven has no job and no purpose in life. Steven has given up and now seeks a mother-figure to date. 

Silver "Christ Hater" Slimer has his own business doing technical work and also teaches. 
Silver "Christ Hater" Slimer offers a true contribution to society. 
Teachers are truly under appreciated.

-- 
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#470904

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-05 19:37 -0700
Message-ID<4388446f-c4fc-41f2-b19f-c089ebc2ae47@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#470630
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 10:17:04 AM UTC-7, RonB wrote:
> "I was a thug for a big part of my growing up,..."
> 
> "I got into fights. I drank and did — and consumed substances that weren't 
> always legal."
> 
> "I might have drank a six-pack in an hour before going back to class, things 
> like that."
> 
> And he admits to using cocaine and pot.
> 
> His name? Barack Obama.
> 
> And nary a peep from self-righteous, hypocritical Democrats.
> 
> https://tinyurl.com/y8v3rnvw 
> 
> -- 
> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.



Onion Knight's posts are really in all respects dishonest. There is zero question that as soon as any released 'blocked person' does something to confuse the crybaby's feelings that they will be blocked again. 

Klaus Schadenfreude can create a virtual machine. Rips what that Mac can do to shreds! 

A persistent, acute, posting itch, regardless of content - like gunky snake camp followers, and satisfactorily-waxed fish, scared stiff by loud music for his own private yearnings. 

- 
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!
https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#470954

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-06 07:23 -0700
Message-ID<e9be0310-a679-4251-aa62-4d7c2abfca1e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#470904
On Friday, October 5, 2018 at 7:37:50 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 10:17:04 AM UTC-7, RonB wrote:
> > "I was a thug for a big part of my growing up,..."
> > 
> > "I got into fights. I drank and did — and consumed substances that weren't 
> > always legal."
> > 
> > "I might have drank a six-pack in an hour before going back to class, things 
> > like that."
> > 
> > And he admits to using cocaine and pot.
> > 
> > His name? Barack Obama.
> > 
> > And nary a peep from self-righteous, hypocritical Democrats.
> > 
> > https://tinyurl.com/y8v3rnvw 
> > 
> > -- 
> > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
> 
> 
> 
> Onion Knight's posts are really in all respects dishonest. There is zero question that as soon as any released 'blocked person' does something to confuse the crybaby's feelings that they will be blocked again. 
> 
> Klaus Schadenfreude can create a virtual machine. Rips what that Mac can do to shreds! 
> 
> A persistent, acute, posting itch, regardless of content - like gunky snake camp followers, and satisfactorily-waxed fish, scared stiff by loud music for his own private yearnings. 
> 
> - 
> What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!
> https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc
> Jonas Eklundh Communication AB



Snit created at least twenty virtual machines in the last year or so. I am sure he and the herd are proud. 

Translation of chrisv speak: His "debugging prowess" blinded him to an extension he wants that does exist on this software. Really, those of you who troll are not able to restrain Red Hat anymore. I am an obsessed advocate of Red Hat, because that's where all the compelling modernization is happening. 

Believe it or not, just recently chrisv was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in satire-quotes to try to paint them as the bad guys) are trying to rewrite Red Hat from scratch. 

chrisv's developed an AI system with the Bellman–Ford algorithm to regurgitate posts which are in the form of ones from Snit's. After yesterday's update I no longer have to issue 'export PATH=$PATH:/users/myapps/<username>' every time I login ;) Thus, my original statement stands sincere and correct. 

- 
Do not click this link!!!
http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_t8w8io_asian-brides
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471029

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-06 17:00 -0700
Message-ID<8f7ce135-39b9-4f17-9a97-25abc2775431@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#470954
On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 7:23:03 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, October 5, 2018 at 7:37:50 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 10:17:04 AM UTC-7, RonB wrote:
> > > "I was a thug for a big part of my growing up,..."
> > > 
> > > "I got into fights. I drank and did — and consumed substances that weren't 
> > > always legal."
> > > 
> > > "I might have drank a six-pack in an hour before going back to class, things 
> > > like that."
> > > 
> > > And he admits to using cocaine and pot.
> > > 
> > > His name? Barack Obama.
> > > 
> > > And nary a peep from self-righteous, hypocritical Democrats.
> > > 
> > > https://tinyurl.com/y8v3rnvw 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Onion Knight's posts are really in all respects dishonest. There is zero question that as soon as any released 'blocked person' does something to confuse the crybaby's feelings that they will be blocked again. 
> > 
> > Klaus Schadenfreude can create a virtual machine. Rips what that Mac can do to shreds! 
> > 
> > A persistent, acute, posting itch, regardless of content - like gunky snake camp followers, and satisfactorily-waxed fish, scared stiff by loud music for his own private yearnings. 
> > 
> > - 
> > What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!
> > https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc
> > Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
> 
> 
> 
> Snit created at least twenty virtual machines in the last year or so. I am sure he and the herd are proud. 
> 
> Translation of chrisv speak: His "debugging prowess" blinded him to an extension he wants that does exist on this software. Really, those of you who troll are not able to restrain Red Hat anymore. I am an obsessed advocate of Red Hat, because that's where all the compelling modernization is happening. 
> 
> Believe it or not, just recently chrisv was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in satire-quotes to try to paint them as the bad guys) are trying to rewrite Red Hat from scratch. 
> 
> chrisv's developed an AI system with the Bellman–Ford algorithm to regurgitate posts which are in the form of ones from Snit's. After yesterday's update I no longer have to issue 'export PATH=$PATH:/users/myapps/<username>' every time I login ;) Thus, my original statement stands sincere and correct. 
> 
> - 
> Do not click this link!!!
> http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_t8w8io_asian-brides
> Jonas Eklundh Communication



It's Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh's problem and he has to want to deal with it. Obviously he would rather attack than face reality. ChromeOS is based on Linux. 

John Gohde just wiped his ass with Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh. I don't grasp that. Dumbness is dumbness and there are "advocates" who are fine with it. A few are even lawyers.It's a long story, and Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh is simultaneously a master at off-the-cuff trolling remarks, while posting with socks with a myriad of tells. 



- 
My Snoring Solution
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/BVpdH5KOc6s
http://www.5z8.info/open.exe_f2s2ea_nazi
https://youtu.be/48_DdtLGR9s
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#470947

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2018-10-06 05:07 -0700
Message-ID<f1bd673f-d804-4a69-bb8a-90c4e7aa6f25@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#470630
Difference being an admission instead of denial.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#470949

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-06 05:32 -0700
Message-ID<9b17d67e-5c8f-4e50-af52-cd4ae4ffe6f0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#470947
On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:07:52 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
> Difference being an admission instead of denial.
> 
> 
> -hh



Seriously, what lie? The Thing is the product of the reality that leftists have been appointed to be in charge of indoctrinating the next generation. It's not a coincidence that he is a foolish leftist. Oh goodness, that is just tons of drivel. 

Habits change. Maybe the ubiquity of a website is getting ridiculous. BTW, I've already told him that his use of "cult-like" to describe knowledgable posters is mud slinging, since he's likening them to mindless sheep. Now let's see, who knows AppleScript, is an avid scripter, has hacked Sandman's account, has passion for this shit and is a colossal whining mama's boy who, when he backs himself into a corner, posts lie after lie after lie even when he's *not* flooding... AND... who struggles to blame everything _he_ is doing on "Sandman" and has for over a decade? Another successful Linux test. That is if you count utter failure as a success. 

-- 
Top Six Ways The Thing Trolls!!
http://www.5z8.info/add-worm_z4r9qk_fakelogin
https://youtu.be/qwb1Ez0GWMA
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#470965

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-06 09:13 -0700
Message-ID<f1cf0417-674d-45f9-8845-b5d6718fc949@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#470947
On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 6:07:52 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> Difference being an admission instead of denial.

Providing that BK actually did what was alleged, do you believe an 
admission would've confirmed his nomination? You know better than 
that. It's quite notable that the latest FBI report includes a statement 
by an alleged witness that allies of Dr. Ford tried to get her to 'revisit' 
her statement denying knowledge of this alleged party and the fact 
that she ever met Kavanaugh in her life. The original statement was 
non-corroborative... but this new statement *screams* of motive...
and not in a good way. 

It's also notable that Dr.Ford wasn't informed they would come to her,
more motive at work... and this time they tossed their witness under 
the bus. Unless Ford was in on it, too (which would be even worse) 
we know these are the facts.

The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#470968

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2018-10-06 16:49 +0000
Message-ID<9g900a8ba.39@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#470965
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 6:07:52 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
>> Difference being an admission instead of denial.
> 
> Providing that BK actually did what was alleged, do you believe an 
> admission would've confirmed his nomination? You know better than 
> that. It's quite notable that the latest FBI report includes a statement 
> by an alleged witness that allies of Dr. Ford tried to get her to 'revisit' 
> her statement denying knowledge of this alleged party and the fact 
> that she ever met Kavanaugh in her life. The original statement was 
> non-corroborative... but this new statement *screams* of motive...
> and not in a good way. 
> 
> It's also notable that Dr.Ford wasn't informed they would come to her,
> more motive at work... and this time they tossed their witness under 
> the bus. Unless Ford was in on it, too (which would be even worse) 
> we know these are the facts.
> 
> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.
> 

Obama was going for some stolen valor street cred.

This guy says he "got into fights":

http://www.thedailyrash.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/600b09201e1.jpg 

Fights with what, a baby deer?

https://bit.ly/2Rv3RoE
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471118

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-10-07 14:15 -0700
Message-ID<g1vbcfF1umgU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#470965
On 10/6/18 9:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 6:07:52 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
>> Difference being an admission instead of denial.
> 
> Providing that BK actually did what was alleged, do you believe an
> admission would've confirmed his nomination? You know better than
> that. It's quite notable that the latest FBI report includes a statement
> by an alleged witness that allies of Dr. Ford tried to get her to 'revisit'
> her statement denying knowledge of this alleged party and the fact
> that she ever met Kavanaugh in her life. The original statement was
> non-corroborative... but this new statement *screams* of motive...
> and not in a good way.

The FBI "investigation" was a sham -- they had their hands tied and were 
not allowed to actually talk to many people.

But even if Kavanaugh is innocent (which seems unlikely) given his open 
bias and dishonesty he is not qualified. But that does not matter to 
partisans... they just wanted to push him through before elections next 
month.

> It's also notable that Dr.Ford wasn't informed they would come to her,
> more motive at work... and this time they tossed their witness under
> the bus. Unless Ford was in on it, too (which would be even worse)
> we know these are the facts.
> 
> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.

This is not "100% hearsay evidence".


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471120

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-07 14:33 -0700
Message-ID<edd847b6-67d1-4223-bf83-04e1323a7dae@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471118
On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 2:16:03 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 10/6/18 9:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 6:07:52 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> >> Difference being an admission instead of denial.
> > 
> > Providing that BK actually did what was alleged, do you believe an
> > admission would've confirmed his nomination? You know better than
> > that. It's quite notable that the latest FBI report includes a statement
> > by an alleged witness that allies of Dr. Ford tried to get her to 'revisit'
> > her statement denying knowledge of this alleged party and the fact
> > that she ever met Kavanaugh in her life. The original statement was
> > non-corroborative... but this new statement *screams* of motive...
> > and not in a good way.
> 
> The FBI "investigation" was a sham -- they had their hands tied and were 
> not allowed to actually talk to many people.
> 
> But even if Kavanaugh is innocent (which seems unlikely) given his open 
> bias and dishonesty he is not qualified. But that does not matter to 
> partisans... they just wanted to push him through before elections next 
> month.
> 
> > It's also notable that Dr.Ford wasn't informed they would come to her,
> > more motive at work... and this time they tossed their witness under
> > the bus. Unless Ford was in on it, too (which would be even worse)
> > we know these are the facts.
> > 
> > The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
> > people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.
> 
> This is not "100% hearsay evidence".
> 
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>



You are as dumb as a shoe. chrisv has toned down the endless self promoting, BS attacks he used to create but he's really the same in the honor dept. He uses socks more now to generate those posts. 

Thanks to chrisv and his 'followers' you now need an approved list. Do a Google Groups search, by and large I lately stopped giving him tons of attention (as of 2011). If people start responding to him again I will jump in... as I've always stated I would. I am referring to good people here, not chrisv's friends, who are just here to disrupt anyway. chrisv is repeatedly seen posting "I KNOW BETTER" when it comes to content on the web where information is easy to find... but chrisv is just too boneheaded and too in over your head to deduce any advice he sees. Peopel who can grok this thread knows it's not written in the way Snit is implying, and some of them are simply manually written. 



--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471194

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-08 08:04 -0700
Message-ID<f1baec09-af8c-41d6-99d6-9a5460c065fc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471120
On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 2:33:40 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 2:16:03 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> > On 10/6/18 9:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 6:07:52 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> > >> Difference being an admission instead of denial.
> > > 
> > > Providing that BK actually did what was alleged, do you believe an
> > > admission would've confirmed his nomination? You know better than
> > > that. It's quite notable that the latest FBI report includes a statement
> > > by an alleged witness that allies of Dr. Ford tried to get her to 'revisit'
> > > her statement denying knowledge of this alleged party and the fact
> > > that she ever met Kavanaugh in her life. The original statement was
> > > non-corroborative... but this new statement *screams* of motive...
> > > and not in a good way.
> > 
> > The FBI "investigation" was a sham -- they had their hands tied and were 
> > not allowed to actually talk to many people.
> > 
> > But even if Kavanaugh is innocent (which seems unlikely) given his open 
> > bias and dishonesty he is not qualified. But that does not matter to 
> > partisans... they just wanted to push him through before elections next 
> > month.
> > 
> > > It's also notable that Dr.Ford wasn't informed they would come to her,
> > > more motive at work... and this time they tossed their witness under
> > > the bus. Unless Ford was in on it, too (which would be even worse)
> > > we know these are the facts.
> > > 
> > > The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
> > > people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.
> > 
> > This is not "100% hearsay evidence".
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> > somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> > 
> > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> > 
> > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
> 
> 
> 
> You are as dumb as a shoe. chrisv has toned down the endless self promoting, BS attacks he used to create but he's really the same in the honor dept. He uses socks more now to generate those posts. 
> 
> Thanks to chrisv and his 'followers' you now need an approved list. Do a Google Groups search, by and large I lately stopped giving him tons of attention (as of 2011). If people start responding to him again I will jump in... as I've always stated I would. I am referring to good people here, not chrisv's friends, who are just here to disrupt anyway. chrisv is repeatedly seen posting "I KNOW BETTER" when it comes to content on the web where information is easy to find... but chrisv is just too boneheaded and too in over your head to deduce any advice he sees. Peopel who can grok this thread knows it's not written in the way Snit is implying, and some of them are simply manually written. 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
> Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.



That's what Flooder Carroll does when he gets humiliated. He always creates a new identity, starts a trolling thread so he can claim it was an accident. Hey it was my left hand... and then Flooder Carroll babbles to himself with his right hand. LOL! How did Flooder Carroll get so self-centered he believes everything is about him?? Sandman trolls Flooder Carroll. Here is a list of names Jonas Eklundh has admitted he attributes to Flooder Carroll "Cactus Pete", "Donald", "Donald Miller", "Horace McSwain", "Hymen", "meat", "Mike Weaver", "Modena IV Drid", "Omar Murad Asfour", "Rhino Plastee", "Soapy", "SopwithCamel", "Sunny Day", "Takuya Saitoh", "The Letter Q", "tmelmosfire", "zevon". 

It's a prolonged saga, and Flooder Carroll is simultaneously a master at off-the-cuff trolling remarks, while posting with forgeries of Flatfish. 

--
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!
https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o
https://youtu.be/48_DdtLGR9s
https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471264

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-08 23:58 -0700
Message-ID<3400a578-142b-409d-9e4c-86e86b5131a2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471194
On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:04:31 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 2:33:40 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 2:16:03 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> > > On 10/6/18 9:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 6:07:52 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> > > >> Difference being an admission instead of denial.
> > > > 
> > > > Providing that BK actually did what was alleged, do you believe an
> > > > admission would've confirmed his nomination? You know better than
> > > > that. It's quite notable that the latest FBI report includes a statement
> > > > by an alleged witness that allies of Dr. Ford tried to get her to 'revisit'
> > > > her statement denying knowledge of this alleged party and the fact
> > > > that she ever met Kavanaugh in her life. The original statement was
> > > > non-corroborative... but this new statement *screams* of motive...
> > > > and not in a good way.
> > > 
> > > The FBI "investigation" was a sham -- they had their hands tied and were 
> > > not allowed to actually talk to many people.
> > > 
> > > But even if Kavanaugh is innocent (which seems unlikely) given his open 
> > > bias and dishonesty he is not qualified. But that does not matter to 
> > > partisans... they just wanted to push him through before elections next 
> > > month.
> > > 
> > > > It's also notable that Dr.Ford wasn't informed they would come to her,
> > > > more motive at work... and this time they tossed their witness under
> > > > the bus. Unless Ford was in on it, too (which would be even worse)
> > > > we know these are the facts.
> > > > 
> > > > The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
> > > > people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.
> > > 
> > > This is not "100% hearsay evidence".
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> > > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> > > somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> > > 
> > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> > > 
> > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > You are as dumb as a shoe. chrisv has toned down the endless self promoting, BS attacks he used to create but he's really the same in the honor dept. He uses socks more now to generate those posts. 
> > 
> > Thanks to chrisv and his 'followers' you now need an approved list. Do a Google Groups search, by and large I lately stopped giving him tons of attention (as of 2011). If people start responding to him again I will jump in... as I've always stated I would. I am referring to good people here, not chrisv's friends, who are just here to disrupt anyway. chrisv is repeatedly seen posting "I KNOW BETTER" when it comes to content on the web where information is easy to find... but chrisv is just too boneheaded and too in over your head to deduce any advice he sees. Peopel who can grok this thread knows it's not written in the way Snit is implying, and some of them are simply manually written. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
> > Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
> 
> 
> 
> That's what Flooder Carroll does when he gets humiliated. He always creates a new identity, starts a trolling thread so he can claim it was an accident. Hey it was my left hand... and then Flooder Carroll babbles to himself with his right hand. LOL! How did Flooder Carroll get so self-centered he believes everything is about him?? Sandman trolls Flooder Carroll. Here is a list of names Jonas Eklundh has admitted he attributes to Flooder Carroll "Cactus Pete", "Donald", "Donald Miller", "Horace McSwain", "Hymen", "meat", "Mike Weaver", "Modena IV Drid", "Omar Murad Asfour", "Rhino Plastee", "Soapy", "SopwithCamel", "Sunny Day", "Takuya Saitoh", "The Letter Q", "tmelmosfire", "zevon". 
> 
> It's a prolonged saga, and Flooder Carroll is simultaneously a master at off-the-cuff trolling remarks, while posting with forgeries of Flatfish. 
> 
> --
> This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!
> https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o
> https://youtu.be/48_DdtLGR9s
> https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw
> Jonas Eklundh



He is a jerk; people have kf'd his puppets/shills. What he really can not make is a script that keeps switching names, then they'd have a chance at being almost as idiotic as he is. 

Too much glue for you, Gluehead. Linux offers the least of any of the competition. 

Your system will crawl while this takes place. And it takes a long time. Snit is being controlled by Microsoft. I have a little script I use as well, but it's a bit different. 

-- 
Eight things to never feed your cat!
http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471184

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-10-08 07:17 -0500
Message-ID<e0imrd1ldajcblbgrl0ik3e2s1tcdbapbg@4ax.com>
In reply to#470965
Steve Carroll wrote:

>The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
>people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.

For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one.  I don't
think that Ford was lying.  But, without proof, we should not be
punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades*
earlier.

Hopefully, the lesson learned, by this and the "me too" movement, is
to speak-up and demand your rights immediately.  This is the lesson
that needs to be taught to our daughters.

Of course, it will always be difficult, with men who are in positions
of power...

-- 
"and this is *wrong*."  -  some ignorant, serially-lying thing,
judging how Linux handles NTFS.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471186

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-08 05:43 -0700
Message-ID<7d839d14-3a88-4fa5-a5e7-70a263bbaa3c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471184
On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 5:17:10 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> >The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
> >people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.
> 
> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one.  I don't
> think that Ford was lying.  But, without proof, we should not be
> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades*
> earlier.
> 
> Hopefully, the lesson learned, by this and the "me too" movement, is
> to speak-up and demand your rights immediately.  This is the lesson
> that needs to be taught to our daughters.
> 
> Of course, it will always be difficult, with men who are in positions
> of power...
> 
> -- 
> "and this is *wrong*."  -  some ignorant, serially-lying thing,
> judging how Linux handles NTFS.



Run a background report on Desk Rabbit and you will see that he was in the big house last year. The investigation sites can not go into that degree of specificity and public lists need to be court ordered. 

Desk Rabbit is far too idiotic to write a MATE script. The only scripting he's ever shown he can do is copying code from me and claiming it as his own. 

I am not going to play like Klaus Schadenfreude did not help me with this crap and I am thankful for his service. Desk Rabbit has Klaus Schadenfreude to copy and should start to sound like he grew a brain from now on ;) Despite Desk Rabbit's claim that he has "no experience in making trouble" (a lie as illustrated by the fact that he destroyed CSMA with his crap) he was seen asking others how they would install a virus remotely. Peopel who can grok our history knows it is not written in the nature Klaus Schadenfreude is saying, and some of them are simply hand written. 

--
Do not click this link!
http://www.5z8.info/yourdick_v1o3ww_manhunter
http://prescottcomputerguy.com/screenflow
http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_j3m3lg_whitepower
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471230

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-10-08 15:06 -0700
Message-ID<g222n7Fj16kU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#471184
On 10/8/18 5:17 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
>> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.
> 
> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one.  I don't
> think that Ford was lying.  But, without proof, we should not be
> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades*
> earlier.

His CURRENT actions showed bias and a lack of qualification. For THAT he 
should not have been put into such a position.

> Hopefully, the lesson learned, by this and the "me too" movement, is
> to speak-up and demand your rights immediately.  This is the lesson
> that needs to be taught to our daughters.
> 
> Of course, it will always be difficult, with men who are in positions
> of power...
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471332

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-10 01:15 +0000
Message-ID<ppjjsa$ipc$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#471184
On 2018-10-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>>The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
>>people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.
>
> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one.  I don't
> think that Ford was lying.  But, without proof, we should not be
> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades*
> earlier.

I think Ford was lying through her teeth. Nothing about her testimony fits 
the character of Justice Kavanaugh. Liking beer and raping women are two 
completely different things — and the women who know (and knew) Justice 
Kavanaugh say that he was always a gentleman with them and always respected 
women. I see that, before Ford's letter was "leaked," she happened to have 
flown (she does that a lot for someone so afraid of flying) to a city in 
Delaware where one of the chief engineer's of the assault on Justice 
Kavanaugh's character lived. Getting the story straight?

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471334

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-09 18:41 -0700
Message-ID<9078a85d-753a-47b1-ae4a-7b56c5d34967@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#471332
On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 6:15:56 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote:
> On 2018-10-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> > Steve Carroll wrote:
> >
> >>The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence,
> >>people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd.
> >
> > For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one.  I don't
> > think that Ford was lying.  But, without proof, we should not be
> > punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades*
> > earlier.
> 
> I think Ford was lying through her teeth. Nothing about her testimony fits 
> the character of Justice Kavanaugh. Liking beer and raping women are two 
> completely different things — and the women who know (and knew) Justice 
> Kavanaugh say that he was always a gentleman with them and always respected 
> women. I see that, before Ford's letter was "leaked," she happened to have 
> flown (she does that a lot for someone so afraid of flying) to a city in 
> Delaware where one of the chief engineer's of the assault on Justice 
> Kavanaugh's character lived. Getting the story straight?
> 
> -- 
> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.



Was that meant to be your best shot? 

A shadow of Klaus Schadenfreude, projected foolishly, at the wrong time. 

Hint: You won't go into a gathering, chug all the rotgut, screw all the women, nab the valuables, and yodel groceries in the privy without being loathed. 

The Mac has better color selection options. Klaus Schadenfreude has proved this time and time again. I still am unconvinced that these posts are unequivocally from a bot. 



--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc
http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#471670

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2018-10-12 07:47 -0400
Message-ID<ppq2rc$5f8$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#471332
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

>

Whatever happened, Kavanaugh proved himself unfit for a lifetime appointment
to the highest court in the land with his sneering non-responses and
a partisan and basically kooky diatribe and veiled threats about "what goes
around comes around".

Some judge he is.

-- 
You have a reputation for being thoroughly reliable and trustworthy.
A pity that it's totally undeserved.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 11  [1] 2 3 … 11  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web