Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243342 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-12 21:53 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-05-14 09:18 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 106 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:53 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 12:47 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:18 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 18:36 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 14:41 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 12:01 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 17:30 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:00 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:23 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 01:30 +0200
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:39 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 20:26 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:43 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:08 -0500
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 13:44 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-14 20:44 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 23:14 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:31 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:07 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:37 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 23:38 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:55 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 00:30 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:46 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:09 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:36 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:41 +0200
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:49 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:32 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 23:00 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-15 01:10 +0200
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:51 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:11 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 23:24 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:34 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:54 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:51 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 20:04 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:15 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 20:30 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:35 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 01:07 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 18:16 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 01:41 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 21:48 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 18:52 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 23:09 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 20:17 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 12:31 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 14:51 +0200
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 09:15 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:55 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 13:25 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:55 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:53 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 09:13 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 13:32 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:46 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 08:27 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:57 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:55 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:01 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 18:49 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 23:07 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 20:27 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:53 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:14 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:52 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 11:42 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 19:01 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 12:12 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 19:27 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 12:42 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 19:48 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 20:15 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:28 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 20:43 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:57 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 21:09 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 14:12 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 21:17 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 14:22 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 23:45 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:54 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 00:03 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:10 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 00:20 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:29 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 20:30 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:44 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 17:55 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:05 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 22:03 +0200
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:06 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 20:14 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:27 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:01 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:02 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 20:10 +0000
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:27 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 17:59 -0400
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:03 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:17 -0700
Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:18 -0700
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 20:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll11r2$vaf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243749 |
On 14-05-14 08:04 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> It's sad to see an old bastard like you come off as stupid as some >> twenty-something mush-head. > > Sandy Hook is real. > 9-11 is real. > > Neither are false flag operations. > > The various governments are evil, we all know that and we all know > that they have been involved in covert operations, cover ups and so > forth. > Sandy Hook nor the 9-11 (except for extreme incompetence) are not 2 > of them. > > If you want to look at conspiracy, look at TWA 800 which I truly > believe is a cover up, for various reasons. > > Just my 2 cents. I never really believed in any conspiracy theories until I went on vacation to Cuba in 2011 and spent most of my time there reading political books which documented the lies, manipulations and fabrications of the American government over the last century. It truly flabbergasted me to read the truth about the lies they've forced us to believe and on my return home, I swore never to purchase American products again. Before that, I wanted to support the United States, our allies, as much as possible and even bought a Jeep when I could virtually buy ANYTHING as an effort to help the American economy. Vietnam was based on a lie, American involvement in the First and Second World Wars was based on lies, the Spanish-American War was based on a lie... hell, even foreign policy and the demonization of certain political figures were lies. It's just one lie after another with the governments in place for the last few decades and a bunch of false flags, all of which are swallowed up as definite truth by ridiculously stupid people like Snit. I was so pissed that I gave a second look to Alex Jones and looked up some of his articles from 2002 to 2004 and couldn't believe how much of what he said came true. Essentially, things are MUCH worse than the Smiling Black Man is trying to get us to believe and assuming that the American government is being good to the people is being incredibly ignorant. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF9959DF.374F7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243755 |
On 5/14/14, 5:30 PM, in article ll11r2$vaf$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > On 14-05-14 08:04 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > >>> It's sad to see an old bastard like you come off as stupid as some >>> twenty-something mush-head. >> >> Sandy Hook is real. >> 9-11 is real. >> >> Neither are false flag operations. >> >> The various governments are evil, we all know that and we all know >> that they have been involved in covert operations, cover ups and so >> forth. >> Sandy Hook nor the 9-11 (except for extreme incompetence) are not 2 >> of them. >> >> If you want to look at conspiracy, look at TWA 800 which I truly >> believe is a cover up, for various reasons. >> >> Just my 2 cents. > > I never really believed in any conspiracy theories until I went on > vacation to Cuba in 2011 and spent most of my time there reading > political books which documented the lies, manipulations and > fabrications of the American government over the last century. It truly > flabbergasted me to read the truth about the lies they've forced us to > believe and on my return home, I swore never to purchase American > products again. Before that, I wanted to support the United States, our > allies, as much as possible and even bought a Jeep when I could > virtually buy ANYTHING as an effort to help the American economy. > Vietnam was based on a lie, American involvement in the First and Second > World Wars was based on lies, the Spanish-American War was based on a > lie... hell, even foreign policy and the demonization of certain > political figures were lies. It's just one lie after another with the > governments in place for the last few decades and a bunch of false > flags, all of which are swallowed up as definite truth by ridiculously > stupid people like Snit. I was so pissed that I gave a second look to > Alex Jones and looked up some of his articles from 2002 to 2004 and > couldn't believe how much of what he said came true. Essentially, things > are MUCH worse than the Smiling Black Man is trying to get us to believe > and assuming that the American government is being good to the people is > being incredibly ignorant. None of this excuses your sick denial of the deaths of 20 kids and 6 adults just so you can feel special and not as afraid of an unpredictable world. And now you look at *Alex Jones* for information. Good grief, you might as well watch Supernatural to figure out the "truth" of the world. Get a grip on reality, please. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 01:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgi93.a340@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #243759 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/14/14, 5:30 PM, in article ll11r2$vaf$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" > <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > >> On 14-05-14 08:04 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> >>>> It's sad to see an old bastard like you come off as stupid as some >>>> twenty-something mush-head. >>> >>> Sandy Hook is real. >>> 9-11 is real. >>> >>> Neither are false flag operations. >>> >>> The various governments are evil, we all know that and we all know >>> that they have been involved in covert operations, cover ups and so >>> forth. >>> Sandy Hook nor the 9-11 (except for extreme incompetence) are not 2 >>> of them. >>> >>> If you want to look at conspiracy, look at TWA 800 which I truly >>> believe is a cover up, for various reasons. >>> >>> Just my 2 cents. >> >> I never really believed in any conspiracy theories until I went on >> vacation to Cuba in 2011 and spent most of my time there reading >> political books which documented the lies, manipulations and >> fabrications of the American government over the last century. It truly >> flabbergasted me to read the truth about the lies they've forced us to >> believe and on my return home, I swore never to purchase American >> products again. Before that, I wanted to support the United States, our >> allies, as much as possible and even bought a Jeep when I could >> virtually buy ANYTHING as an effort to help the American economy. >> Vietnam was based on a lie, American involvement in the First and Second >> World Wars was based on lies, the Spanish-American War was based on a >> lie... hell, even foreign policy and the demonization of certain >> political figures were lies. It's just one lie after another with the >> governments in place for the last few decades and a bunch of false >> flags, all of which are swallowed up as definite truth by ridiculously >> stupid people like Snit. I was so pissed that I gave a second look to >> Alex Jones and looked up some of his articles from 2002 to 2004 and >> couldn't believe how much of what he said came true. Essentially, things >> are MUCH worse than the Smiling Black Man is trying to get us to believe >> and assuming that the American government is being good to the people is >> being incredibly ignorant. > > None of this excuses your sick denial of the deaths of 20 kids and 6 adults > just so you can feel special and not as afraid of an unpredictable world. > Chris Matthews much?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 18:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF99637E.37506%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243766 |
On 5/14/14, 6:07 PM, in article hgi93.a340@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> I never really believed in any conspiracy theories until I went on >>> vacation to Cuba in 2011 and spent most of my time there reading >>> political books which documented the lies, manipulations and >>> fabrications of the American government over the last century. It truly >>> flabbergasted me to read the truth about the lies they've forced us to >>> believe and on my return home, I swore never to purchase American >>> products again. Before that, I wanted to support the United States, our >>> allies, as much as possible and even bought a Jeep when I could >>> virtually buy ANYTHING as an effort to help the American economy. >>> Vietnam was based on a lie, American involvement in the First and Second >>> World Wars was based on lies, the Spanish-American War was based on a >>> lie... hell, even foreign policy and the demonization of certain >>> political figures were lies. It's just one lie after another with the >>> governments in place for the last few decades and a bunch of false >>> flags, all of which are swallowed up as definite truth by ridiculously >>> stupid people like Snit. I was so pissed that I gave a second look to >>> Alex Jones and looked up some of his articles from 2002 to 2004 and >>> couldn't believe how much of what he said came true. Essentially, things >>> are MUCH worse than the Smiling Black Man is trying to get us to believe >>> and assuming that the American government is being good to the people is >>> being incredibly ignorant. >> >> None of this excuses your sick denial of the deaths of 20 kids and 6 adults >> just so you can feel special and not as afraid of an unpredictable world. >> > > Chris Matthews much? Never watched the show. I have seen an occasional clip but had to look him up to even know what he looks like. But let's say I watched his every show? So what? Would not change the facts. You are moving goal posts. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 01:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tyue002q.453p@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #243767 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/14/14, 6:07 PM, in article hgi93.a340@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>> I never really believed in any conspiracy theories until I went on >>>> vacation to Cuba in 2011 and spent most of my time there reading >>>> political books which documented the lies, manipulations and >>>> fabrications of the American government over the last century. It truly >>>> flabbergasted me to read the truth about the lies they've forced us to >>>> believe and on my return home, I swore never to purchase American >>>> products again. Before that, I wanted to support the United States, our >>>> allies, as much as possible and even bought a Jeep when I could >>>> virtually buy ANYTHING as an effort to help the American economy. >>>> Vietnam was based on a lie, American involvement in the First and Second >>>> World Wars was based on lies, the Spanish-American War was based on a >>>> lie... hell, even foreign policy and the demonization of certain >>>> political figures were lies. It's just one lie after another with the >>>> governments in place for the last few decades and a bunch of false >>>> flags, all of which are swallowed up as definite truth by ridiculously >>>> stupid people like Snit. I was so pissed that I gave a second look to >>>> Alex Jones and looked up some of his articles from 2002 to 2004 and >>>> couldn't believe how much of what he said came true. Essentially, things >>>> are MUCH worse than the Smiling Black Man is trying to get us to believe >>>> and assuming that the American government is being good to the people is >>>> being incredibly ignorant. >>> >>> None of this excuses your sick denial of the deaths of 20 kids and 6 adults >>> just so you can feel special and not as afraid of an unpredictable world. >>> >> >> Chris Matthews much? > > Never watched the show. I have seen an occasional clip but had to look him > up to even know what he looks like. > > But let's say I watched his every show? So what? Would not change the facts. > You are moving goal posts. > No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 21:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll16de$nnl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243768 |
On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/14/14, 6:07 PM, in article hgi93.a340@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>> I never really believed in any conspiracy theories until I went on >>>>> vacation to Cuba in 2011 and spent most of my time there reading >>>>> political books which documented the lies, manipulations and >>>>> fabrications of the American government over the last century. It truly >>>>> flabbergasted me to read the truth about the lies they've forced us to >>>>> believe and on my return home, I swore never to purchase American >>>>> products again. Before that, I wanted to support the United States, our >>>>> allies, as much as possible and even bought a Jeep when I could >>>>> virtually buy ANYTHING as an effort to help the American economy. >>>>> Vietnam was based on a lie, American involvement in the First and Second >>>>> World Wars was based on lies, the Spanish-American War was based on a >>>>> lie... hell, even foreign policy and the demonization of certain >>>>> political figures were lies. It's just one lie after another with the >>>>> governments in place for the last few decades and a bunch of false >>>>> flags, all of which are swallowed up as definite truth by ridiculously >>>>> stupid people like Snit. I was so pissed that I gave a second look to >>>>> Alex Jones and looked up some of his articles from 2002 to 2004 and >>>>> couldn't believe how much of what he said came true. Essentially, things >>>>> are MUCH worse than the Smiling Black Man is trying to get us to believe >>>>> and assuming that the American government is being good to the people is >>>>> being incredibly ignorant. >>>> >>>> None of this excuses your sick denial of the deaths of 20 kids and 6 adults >>>> just so you can feel special and not as afraid of an unpredictable world. >>>> >>> >>> Chris Matthews much? >> >> Never watched the show. I have seen an occasional clip but had to look him >> up to even know what he looks like. >> >> But let's say I watched his every show? So what? Would not change the facts. >> You are moving goal posts. >> > > No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy > theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing > to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it > all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- > assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity he demonstrates is demoralizing. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 18:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF996BEC.3750D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243769 |
On 5/14/14, 6:48 PM, in article ll16de$nnl$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>>>> None of this excuses your sick denial of the deaths of 20 kids and 6 >>>>> adults >>>>> just so you can feel special and not as afraid of an unpredictable world. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Chris Matthews much? >>> >>> Never watched the show. I have seen an occasional clip but had to look him >>> up to even know what he looks like. >>> >>> But let's say I watched his every show? So what? Would not change the facts. >>> You are moving goal posts. >>> >> >> No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy >> theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing >> to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it >> all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- >> assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. > > Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his > quoted articles as well. Baseless insults. > The guy is so content with being a zombie who believes everything the > mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to piss on his head if Jon > Stewart told him that it was good for him. Baseless accusations. Wow. You are on a roll! > Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity he > demonstrates is demoralizing. And here you go, asking people to avoid information about your self-serving, irrational, BS conspiracy theory nonsense you know, deep down, is completely unsupportable. You fear what I have to say. It pains you to have to deal with reason and logic and evidence. So be it. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 23:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <16y7x4ovckxbu.1qov4o90oamkt.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243769 |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 21:48:31 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/14/14, 6:07 PM, in article hgi93.a340@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>> I never really believed in any conspiracy theories until I went on >>>>>> vacation to Cuba in 2011 and spent most of my time there reading >>>>>> political books which documented the lies, manipulations and >>>>>> fabrications of the American government over the last century. It truly >>>>>> flabbergasted me to read the truth about the lies they've forced us to >>>>>> believe and on my return home, I swore never to purchase American >>>>>> products again. Before that, I wanted to support the United States, our >>>>>> allies, as much as possible and even bought a Jeep when I could >>>>>> virtually buy ANYTHING as an effort to help the American economy. >>>>>> Vietnam was based on a lie, American involvement in the First and Second >>>>>> World Wars was based on lies, the Spanish-American War was based on a >>>>>> lie... hell, even foreign policy and the demonization of certain >>>>>> political figures were lies. It's just one lie after another with the >>>>>> governments in place for the last few decades and a bunch of false >>>>>> flags, all of which are swallowed up as definite truth by ridiculously >>>>>> stupid people like Snit. I was so pissed that I gave a second look to >>>>>> Alex Jones and looked up some of his articles from 2002 to 2004 and >>>>>> couldn't believe how much of what he said came true. Essentially, things >>>>>> are MUCH worse than the Smiling Black Man is trying to get us to believe >>>>>> and assuming that the American government is being good to the people is >>>>>> being incredibly ignorant. >>>>> >>>>> None of this excuses your sick denial of the deaths of 20 kids and 6 adults >>>>> just so you can feel special and not as afraid of an unpredictable world. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Chris Matthews much? >>> >>> Never watched the show. I have seen an occasional clip but had to look him >>> up to even know what he looks like. >>> >>> But let's say I watched his every show? So what? Would not change the facts. >>> You are moving goal posts. >>> >> >> No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy >> theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing >> to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it >> all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- >> assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. > > Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his > quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who > believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to > piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. > Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity > he demonstrates is demoralizing. Ignore him. Most people do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 20:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF997FBD.37521%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243780 |
On 5/14/14, 8:09 PM, in article 16y7x4ovckxbu.1qov4o90oamkt.dlg@40tude.net, "flatfish+++" <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy >>> theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing >>> to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it >>> all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- >>> assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. >> >> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his >> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who >> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to >> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. >> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity >> he demonstrates is demoralizing. > > Ignore him. > Most people do. I wish people in COLA would ignore *me* as a topic and instead focus on other things. I really am not that interesting. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 12:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9eo.a34p@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #243769 |
Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: > > > > No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy > > theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing > > to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it > > all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- > > assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. > Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his > quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who > believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to > piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. > Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity > he demonstrates is demoralizing. He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 14:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <871tvv6w96.fsf@development.richardriley.net> |
| In reply to | #243823 |
owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> writes: > Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >> On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: > >> > >> > No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy >> > theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing >> > to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it >> > all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- >> > assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. > >> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his >> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who >> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to >> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. >> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity >> he demonstrates is demoralizing. > > He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. > You mean he doesn't like arseholes pretending some sort of conspiracy theory, with no proof, when there are peoples misery and feelings and loss being totally ignored. You and Slimer should be ashamed of yourselves. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 09:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll2ekv$hgt$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243827 |
On 14-05-15 08:51 AM, Hadron wrote: > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> writes: > >> Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>> On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: >> >>>> >>>> No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy >>>> theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing >>>> to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it >>>> all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- >>>> assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. >> >>> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his >>> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who >>> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to >>> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. >>> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity >>> he demonstrates is demoralizing. >> >> He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. >> > > You mean he doesn't like arseholes pretending some sort of conspiracy > theory, with no proof, when there are peoples misery and feelings and > loss being totally ignored. > > You and Slimer should be ashamed of yourselves. Even if proof were to be offered, your boyfriend Snit and you would simply argue that the source is worthless because it's not sponsored by some billionaire. Arguing with you and the man whose ass crust you love to eat is pointless. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 16:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF9AA20A.375F6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243835 |
On 5/15/14, 6:15 AM, in article ll2ekv$hgt$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>> He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. >>> >> >> You mean he doesn't like arseholes pretending some sort of conspiracy >> theory, with no proof, when there are peoples misery and feelings and >> loss being totally ignored. >> >> You and Slimer should be ashamed of yourselves. > > Even if proof were to be offered, your boyfriend Snit and you would > simply argue that the source is worthless because it's not sponsored by > some billionaire. Arguing with you and the man whose ass crust you love > to eat is pointless. You connect unrelated dots in much the same way people find constellations in the stars. You glom on to people who have found patterns by looking at drips of evidence hand-picked from oceans of data. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 13:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hg903.a34pe@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #243827 |
Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote: > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> writes: > > Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > >> On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: > > > >> > > >> > No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy > >> > theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing > >> > to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it > >> > all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- > >> > assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. > > > >> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his > >> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who > >> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to > >> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. > >> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity > >> he demonstrates is demoralizing. > > > > He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. > > > You mean he doesn't like arseholes pretending some sort of conspiracy > theory, with no proof, when there are peoples misery and feelings and > loss being totally ignored. > You and Slimer should be ashamed of yourselves. If I decide to consider and discuss whether the chicken might have come first, should I be worried about the egg's feelings?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 16:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF9AA217.375F7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243837 |
On 5/15/14, 6:25 AM, in article hg903.a34pe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his >>>> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who >>>> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to >>>> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. >>>> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity >>>> he demonstrates is demoralizing. >>> >>> He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. >>> > >> You mean he doesn't like arseholes pretending some sort of conspiracy >> theory, with no proof, when there are peoples misery and feelings and >> loss being totally ignored. > >> You and Slimer should be ashamed of yourselves. > > If I decide to consider and discuss whether the chicken might have come first, > should I be worried about the egg's feelings? You connect unrelated dots in much the same way people find constellations in the stars. You glom on to people who have found patterns by looking at drips of evidence hand-picked from oceans of data. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 16:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF9AA187.375F3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243827 |
On 5/15/14, 5:51 AM, in article 871tvv6w96.fsf@development.richardriley.net, "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote: > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> writes: > >> Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>> On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: >> >>>> >>>> No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy >>>> theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing >>>> to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it >>>> all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- >>>> assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. >> >>> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his >>> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who >>> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to >>> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. >>> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity >>> he demonstrates is demoralizing. >> >> He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. >> > > You mean he doesn't like arseholes pretending some sort of conspiracy > theory, with no proof, when there are peoples misery and feelings and > loss being totally ignored. > > You and Slimer should be ashamed of yourselves. They connect unrelated dots in much the same way people find constellations in the stars. They glom on to people who have found patterns by looking at drips of evidence hand-picked from oceans of data. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 09:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll2ehk$hgt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243823 |
On 14-05-15 08:31 AM, owl wrote: > Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >> On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: > >>> >>> No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy >>> theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing >>> to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it >>> all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- >>> assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. > >> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his >> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who >> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to >> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. >> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity >> he demonstrates is demoralizing. > > He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. I don't think so, he just can't stand the fact that you stray from what the media believes is the moral and proper stance. He has no opinion of his own, he simply repeats whatever he heard on the Daily Show or ABC News. It's too bad the clown can't afford to buy a book or two to educate himself about his beloved government and the Smiling Black Man. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 13:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghj0a3wr.3p@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #243834 |
Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > On 14-05-15 08:31 AM, owl wrote: > > Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > >> On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: > > > >>> > >>> No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy > >>> theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing > >>> to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it > >>> all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- > >>> assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. > > > >> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his > >> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who > >> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to > >> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. > >> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity > >> he demonstrates is demoralizing. > > > > He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. > I don't think so, he just can't stand the fact that you stray from what > the media believes is the moral and proper stance. He has no opinion of > his own, he simply repeats whatever he heard on the Daily Show or ABC > News. It's too bad the clown can't afford to buy a book or two to > educate himself about his beloved government and the Smiling Black Man. Maybe, but all of his "arguments" make reference to the "feelings" of these non-existent people. His "proof" that they existed is the existence of the actors who portrayed them. Even video clips of their previous thespian endeavors is not enough to open his eyes. It's all about emotion and feeling with Snit. Logic and reason are foreign concepts to him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 10:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll2jvo$pt9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243838 |
On 14-05-15 09:32 AM, owl wrote: > Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >> On 14-05-15 08:31 AM, owl wrote: >>> Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>>> On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy >>>>> theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing >>>>> to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it >>>>> all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- >>>>> assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. >>> >>>> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his >>>> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who >>>> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to >>>> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. >>>> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity >>>> he demonstrates is demoralizing. >>> >>> He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. > >> I don't think so, he just can't stand the fact that you stray from what >> the media believes is the moral and proper stance. He has no opinion of >> his own, he simply repeats whatever he heard on the Daily Show or ABC >> News. It's too bad the clown can't afford to buy a book or two to >> educate himself about his beloved government and the Smiling Black Man. > > Maybe, but all of his "arguments" make reference to the "feelings" > of these non-existent people. His "proof" that they existed is the > existence of the actors who portrayed them. Even video clips of their > previous thespian endeavors is not enough to open his eyes. It's all > about emotion and feeling with Snit. Logic and reason are foreign concepts > to him. I've seen the videos you refer to and have to admit that were the event authentic, there would be no need to hire actors to portray victims. The very fact that they did is incredibly fishy and makes any information the American government passes along suspicious at best. For me, it's the same thing with the Boston Bombing. The fact that one of the two was killed and that the other was "unable to speak" says a lot about the guilt of these people. The fact that they were also associated with the CIA itself speaks volumes as well. In fact, let's not forget that there is surveillance video of the aftermath of the event where government workers are clearly seen retrieving something from near the site of the crime without any kind of reaction to the horror which just transpired. It's as if it had been planned. Let's not forget that a drill for such an event was conducted on the day of the event just as it was in London for their bombing. All of this evidence is apparently meaningless. What about the Batman shooter? Does that guy look like he was conscious of what he was doing? They didn't even allow him to speak to the court because he was in some sort of trance and practically unaware of his surroundings. It was as if he was sent there with the explicit objective of shooting innocent people. Besides, he came in from the back... WHO LET HIM IN? I can't believe that people living within the borders of the United States can be so stupid to disregard this evidence and accept the most ridiculous excuses as answers and explanations to the questions. I seriously cannot fathom how Snit and his cult followers can be so ridiculously idiotic. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 08:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF9A2AEA.37591%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243843 |
On 5/15/14, 7:46 AM, in article ll2jvo$pt9$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > On 14-05-15 09:32 AM, owl wrote: >> Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>> On 14-05-15 08:31 AM, owl wrote: >>>> Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>>>> On 14-05-14 09:41 PM, owl wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No, it's not moving goal posts. Your boring dismissal of all "conspiracy >>>>>> theories" as being rooted in some psychobabble nonsense about needing >>>>>> to reconcile "random" events, so one's poor little brain can cope with it >>>>>> all, sounds just like Matthews' Kennedy-fanboy dismissal of every JFK- >>>>>> assassination investigatory effort outside the Warren Commission. >>>> >>>>> Snit is such a monstrous moron that it actually pains me to read his >>>>> quoted articles as well. The guy is so content with being a zombie who >>>>> believes everything the mainstream media tells him that he'd allow me to >>>>> piss on his head if Jon Stewart told him that it was good for him. >>>>> Seriously though, stop responding to the guy. The incredible stupidity >>>>> he demonstrates is demoralizing. >>>> >>>> He's too emotional on this subject to have a reasoned debate anyway. >> >>> I don't think so, he just can't stand the fact that you stray from what >>> the media believes is the moral and proper stance. He has no opinion of >>> his own, he simply repeats whatever he heard on the Daily Show or ABC >>> News. It's too bad the clown can't afford to buy a book or two to >>> educate himself about his beloved government and the Smiling Black Man. >> >> Maybe, but all of his "arguments" make reference to the "feelings" >> of these non-existent people. His "proof" that they existed is the >> existence of the actors who portrayed them. Even video clips of their >> previous thespian endeavors is not enough to open his eyes. It's all >> about emotion and feeling with Snit. Logic and reason are foreign concepts >> to him. > > I've seen the videos you refer to and have to admit that were the event > authentic, there would be no need to hire actors to portray victims. Nor any reason to think they did! > The > very fact that they did is incredibly fishy and makes any information > the American government passes along suspicious at best. And here you call an unsupported claim a "fact". > For me, it's the same thing with the Boston Bombing. Right: the best predictor of someone believing in one irrational conspiracy theory is their belief in others. > The fact that one of the two was killed and that the other was "unable to > speak" says a lot about the guilt of these people. When you are eager to connect dots to make yourself feel comfortable and use a lot of confirmation bias, sure! > The fact that they were also associated with the CIA itself speaks volumes as > well. It adds to your confirmation bias. No doubt. > In fact, let's not forget that there is surveillance video of the aftermath of > the event where government workers are clearly seen retrieving something from > near the site of the crime without any kind of reaction to the horror which > just transpired. Not shown - but even if true, the horror would be no less real if planned. Were these "people" robots? > It's as if it had been planned. Sure, but not by whom you are accusing. That is your confirmation bias. You are pulling up drops of data in a sea of information and ignoring the big picture to connect dots in a way that fits what you *want* to be true. In other words: you eschew logic and and reason so you can feel better. It is really quite pathetic. > Let's not forget that a drill for such an event was conducted on the day of > the event just as it was in London for their bombing. All of this evidence is > apparently meaningless. You can always find dots to connect. That is what conspiracy theorists do! Humans are very good at connecting unrelated dots to find pictures they want to see. Look at the stars! Every society has, literally, connected the dots to fit what they see in the world. Does it mean the stars were put there to look like what you think you see... no. Of course not. > What about the Batman shooter? Does that guy look like he was conscious > of what he was doing? They didn't even allow him to speak to the court > because he was in some sort of trance and practically unaware of his > surroundings. It was as if he was sent there with the explicit objective > of shooting innocent people. Besides, he came in from the back... WHO > LET HIM IN? > > I can't believe that people living within the borders of the United > States can be so stupid to disregard this evidence and accept the most > ridiculous excuses as answers and explanations to the questions. I > seriously cannot fathom how Snit and his cult followers can be so > ridiculously idiotic. Look at all the constellations. How pretty! -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web