Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #481702 > unrolled thread

Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary

Started byfr314159@gmail.com
First post2018-12-21 05:39 -0800
Last post2018-12-21 19:49 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 139 — 18 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 05:39 -0800
    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 08:23 -0700
      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 07:36 -0800
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 07:52 -0800
          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 07:58 -0800
            fr31 is a concave-head retard Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 08:04 -0800
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 20:48 +0000
              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 17:25 -0500
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 22:42 +0000
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 18:13 -0700
          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 20:46 +0000
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 07:00 -0800
              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 15:05 +0000
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 07:14 -0800
                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:16 +0000
                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:20 -0800
                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:39 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:55 -0800
                          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 17:22 +0000
                            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:40 -0800
                              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 17:57 +0000
                                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:06 -0700
                                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 18:22 +0000
                                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:26 -0700
                                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 18:36 +0000
                "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 10:34 -0800
                  Re: "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-22 15:33 -0500
                    "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 16:00 -0800
                  Re: "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 17:27 -0800
                    Re: "God" ( nature, 4 dimensional SpaceTime ) is static, immutable. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 17:28 -0800
                      "Time is money" and "Buy some time". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 19:45 -0800
                        Re: "Time is money" and "Buy some time". "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 20:56 -0800
                          We value society. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 21:41 -0800
                            Re: We value society. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-23 00:42 -0600
                            Re: We value society. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:47 -0800
                              Don't get banished to the "woods" (jail). Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-23 13:38 -0800
                  "Time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter." Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 19:54 -0800
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-21 16:40 +0000
          Geniuses post links to their servers. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 09:46 -0800
            Re: Geniuses post links to their servers. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-21 18:15 +0000
              "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 11:01 -0800
                Re: "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 16:40 -0500
                Re: "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 00:31 +0000
                  I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 19:58 -0800
                    Re: I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 05:12 +0000
                      Re: I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:26 +0000
                        Re: I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 08:18 +0000
                          Re: I'm a "genius" ( compared to you ) because I use "WinSCP.EXE". "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 00:58 -0800
                  Re: "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:15 +0000
                    Re: "imgur.com" is for _ ordinary people, not geniuses. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 07:42 +0000
          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 09:56 -0800
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-21 18:09 +0000
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 10:33 -0800
              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 11:04 -0800
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 07:23 -0800
                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 15:56 +0000
                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:03 -0800
                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 16:19 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:24 -0800
                          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 16:32 +0000
                            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:43 +0000
                              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:04 -0800
                                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 17:24 +0000
                                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 17:39 +0000
                                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:47 -0800
                                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 17:56 +0000
                                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:04 -0700
                                Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 11:36 -0800
                                  Re: Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 21:44 +0000
                                    Re: Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:34 +0000
                          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 16:42 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-22 15:30 -0500
                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:29 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-22 16:38 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:51 -0800
                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:19 +0000
                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:22 -0800
                      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 16:41 +0000
                        Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ). Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 10:57 -0800
                          Re: Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ). Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 19:48 +0000
                            Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 12:09 -0800
                              Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 13:20 -0700
                              Re: Android, with its touchscreen interface ( written in Java )... Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 20:26 +0000
                                Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 15:58 -0800
                                  Re: Oracle's 9$ billion lawsuit is heading to the US Supreme Court. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 19:10 -0500
                            Re: Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ). chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-26 07:33 -0600
                      Usenet servers. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 11:16 -0800
                        Re: Usenet servers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 12:24 -0700
                          Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-22 11:49 -0800
                            Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 13:19 -0700
                            Re: Why wipe your ass when someone else could do it for you ? "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0800
                        Re: Usenet servers. "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-12-28 08:30 -0800
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 20:45 +0000
      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 10:53 -0500
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 07:58 -0800
        Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 08:00 -0800
          Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 08:16 -0800
            Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 17:20 -0500
              Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 22:41 +0000
                Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 00:47 +0000
                  You don't need to know, Owl. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 20:05 -0800
                    Re: You don't need to know, Owl. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 05:15 +0000
                      Stick to your knitting, Owl. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 22:02 -0800
                        Re: Stick to your knitting, Owl. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 06:54 +0000
                          "imgur.com"  LOL ! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 23:14 -0800
                            Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 13:18 +0000
                              Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-23 14:50 +0000
                                Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 15:43 +0000
                                  Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:47 -0800
                              Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:37 -0800
                                Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 15:51 +0000
                                  Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-23 16:00 +0000
                                    Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 16:13 +0000
                                Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-23 15:59 +0000
                                  Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 16:14 +0000
                                  Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 08:17 -0800
                                    Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 16:43 +0000
                                      Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-23 16:43 +0000
                                      Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 08:48 -0800
                                        Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 16:52 +0000
                                          Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 09:06 -0800
                                            Re: "imgur.com"  LOL ! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 19:13 +0000
                                        Re: "imgur.com" LOL ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-23 17:00 +0000
                              Promoting "HopTo.ORG". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-23 13:47 -0800
                                Re: Promoting "HopTo.ORG". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:17 +0000
                          Re: Stick to your knitting, Owl. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:29 +0000
                            Re: Stick to your knitting, Owl. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 08:03 +0000
                      Re: You don't need to know, Owl. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:27 +0000
                        Re: You don't need to know, Owl. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 08:08 +0000
                      Re: You don't need to know, Owl. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-22 08:36 -0500
                    Re: You don't need to know, Owl. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:24 +0000
                  Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-22 07:23 +0000
                    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-22 08:21 +0000
      Fabian wants his videos to autoplay, so we have to watch them. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-21 08:49 -0800
        Re: Fabian wants his videos to autoplay, so we have to watch them. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 17:21 -0500
    Shit Happens:  How else can you account for fr31? Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 08:27 -0800
    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-21 14:43 -0500
      Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 12:00 -0800
    Re: Google Groups Rejects In-Line Binary Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-21 19:49 +0000

Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7  Next page →

#481864

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-12-22 16:43 +0000
Message-ID<5RtTD.24443$dd4.12231@fx37.am4>
In reply to#481857
On 2018-12-22, F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 08:24:57 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>> 
>> you don't know anything about that 
>> topic (multi track audio),
>>
>
> You are the idiot that knows nothing.
>
> All that you can do is push the ersatz "buttons" on your shit
> software.
>
> But you could NEVER write the code that underlies the action
> of those "buttons."
>
Writing code for living is bloody money... 

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481869

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-22 09:04 -0800
Message-ID<d8b767a3-a617-40a3-9ca5-e2d6615bd794@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#481864
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 9:43:47 AM UTC-7, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On 2018-12-22, F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 08:24:57 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >
> >> 
> >> you don't know anything about that 
> >> topic (multi track audio),
> >>
> >
> > You are the idiot that knows nothing.
> >
> > All that you can do is push the ersatz "buttons" on your shit
> > software.
> >
> > But you could NEVER write the code that underlies the action
> > of those "buttons."
> >
> Writing code for living is bloody money... 

But in Feeb's mind, if you write 'that Javash*t' for $$ (or anything 
to do with the web, really) you're a sellout, clueless or you're an 
unREAL MAN, etc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481872

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-12-22 17:24 +0000
Message-ID<qruTD.23417$CD3.9225@fx05.am4>
In reply to#481869
On 2018-12-22, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 9:43:47 AM UTC-7, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> On 2018-12-22, F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 08:24:57 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> >
>> >> 
>> >> you don't know anything about that 
>> >> topic (multi track audio),
>> >>
>> >
>> > You are the idiot that knows nothing.
>> >
>> > All that you can do is push the ersatz "buttons" on your shit
>> > software.
>> >
>> > But you could NEVER write the code that underlies the action
>> > of those "buttons."
>> >
>> Writing code for living is bloody money... 
>
> But in Feeb's mind, if you write 'that Javash*t' for $$ (or anything 
> to do with the web, really) you're a sellout, clueless or you're an 
> unREAL MAN, etc.
I think that majority of programming jobs nowadays are web programming.

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481874

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2018-12-22 17:39 +0000
Message-ID<pvlssm02r2a@news3.newsguy.com>
In reply to#481872
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:24:38 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:

>
> majority of programming jobs nowadays are web programming.
>

Web programming is "programming" in the same sense that putting a TV dinner
in the microwave is "cooking."

Of course, one must be a REAL PROGRAMMER to be able to appreciate that
analogy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481876

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-22 09:47 -0800
Message-ID<178dfda9-29b2-4106-9adb-c1b5784d382a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#481874
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 10:40:03 AM UTC-7, F. Russell wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:24:38 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:
> 
> >
> > majority of programming jobs nowadays are web programming.
> >
> 
> Web programming is "programming" in the same sense that putting a TV dinner
> in the microwave is "cooking."

Right... because *everything* is already 'prebuilt' for you <eyeroll>:

<https://streamable.com/b1pbl>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481879

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-12-22 17:56 +0000
Message-ID<eVuTD.108850$DWh1.73050@fx36.am4>
In reply to#481874
On 2018-12-22, F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:24:38 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:
>
>>
>> majority of programming jobs nowadays are web programming.
>>
>
> Web programming is "programming" in the same sense that putting a TV dinner
> in the microwave is "cooking."
>
> Of course, one must be a REAL PROGRAMMER to be able to appreciate that
> analogy.

Real programmer ;)
>


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481882

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-22 11:04 -0700
Message-ID<pvlubn$fmq$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#481879
On 2018-12-22 17:56:26 +0000, Melzzzzz said:

> On 2018-12-22, F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:24:38 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> majority of programming jobs nowadays are web programming.
>>> 
>> 
>> Web programming is "programming" in the same sense that putting a TV dinner
>> in the microwave is "cooking."
>> 
>> Of course, one must be a REAL PROGRAMMER to be able to appreciate that
>> analogy.
> 
> Real programmer ;)


Web stuff is so easy that 'REAL PROGRAMMER Feeb' quickly solved an 
issue he whined about...

<https://streamable.com/fgosa>

(and this was just CSS)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481892 — Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-12-22 11:36 -0800
SubjectFabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.22--11.36am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#481869
Steve wrote:
> in Feeb's mind, if you write 'that Javash*t' for $$ (or anything 
> to do with the web, really) you're a sellout, clueless or you're an 
> unREAL MAN, etc.

Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481955 — Re: Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos.

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-23 21:44 +0000
SubjectRe: Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos.
Message-ID<pvovkm$kta$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#481892
On 2018-12-22, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> Steve wrote:
>> in Feeb's mind, if you write 'that Javash*t' for $$ (or anything 
>> to do with the web, really) you're a sellout, clueless or you're an 
>> unREAL MAN, etc.
>
> Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos.

A wet washrag is more manly than Jeff Bezos.

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481958 — Re: Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos.

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2018-12-23 22:34 +0000
SubjectRe: Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos.
Message-ID<9a980aba838a.3a@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#481955
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2018-12-22, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>> Steve wrote:
>>> in Feeb's mind, if you write 'that Javash*t' for $$ (or anything 
>>> to do with the web, really) you're a sellout, clueless or you're an 
>>> unREAL MAN, etc.
>>
>> Fabian thinks he's more manly than Jeff Bezos.
> 
> A wet washrag is more manly than Jeff Bezos.
> 

His right eye is smaller than his left eye:

o O
===

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481863

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2018-12-22 16:42 +0000
Message-ID<pvlpif11hq2@news2.newsguy.com>
In reply to#481854
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 08:24:57 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote:

> 
> No you can't, because you don't know anything about that 
> topic (multi track audio),  
>

Ooops!  Here is the revised imagined listing:

The soundtrack to "Binky Goes to Hollywood"

The soundtrack to "Cinderella Gets a New Dwarf"

The soundtrack to "Uncle Whitey Plays the Blues"

Etc., etc., etc., ad nauseum.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  All worthy endeavors for
for a REAL MAN.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481899

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2018-12-22 15:30 -0500
Message-ID<haxTD.91736$h57.22848@fx38.iad>
In reply to#481849
On 12/22/2018 11:19 AM, F. Russell wrote:

> How to Improve Your Golf -- Tips from the Masters

If you were manly (and flush) enough to be a golfer, you'd understand 
how valuable such tips are.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481856

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-12-22 16:29 +0000
Message-ID<YDtTD.24438$dd4.13148@fx37.am4>
In reply to#481843
On 2018-12-22, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-7, F. Russell wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 07:23:48 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> 
>> >
>> > Why
>> > would anyone pay extra for Usenet access when you can get
>> > it for free? This makes sense to you?
>> >
>> 
>> The price for Usenet access is so low that it is essentially
>> free.
>> 
>> I pay only $29.95 for an ENTIRE FUCKING YEAR.
>
> And for what? I pay what I do (well over $100 a month) for a fast 
> internet connection because I derive value from it, need it to be
> able to move large files quickly. Why value would I derive from
> paying for Usenet... that I already get for free? 

It's much more comfortable experience then using free services which are
limited. Eg crossposting, followups, text formating and such...
>


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481859

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2018-12-22 16:38 +0000
Message-ID<pvlp9o01hq2@news2.newsguy.com>
In reply to#481856
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 16:29:44 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:

> 
> It's much more comfortable experience then using free services
>

Yeah.  Tell that fucking idiot.

Those web services are so fucking sluggish and clunky that even
a brain-dead housewife would get irritated.

But REAL Usenet access is vastly more versatile and efficient.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481865

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-22 08:51 -0800
Message-ID<a9470aa4-cf4e-43ec-a41a-965d4fe4d4b5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#481856
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 9:29:46 AM UTC-7, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On 2018-12-22, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-7, F. Russell wrote:
> >> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 07:23:48 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> 
> >> >
> >> > Why
> >> > would anyone pay extra for Usenet access when you can get
> >> > it for free? This makes sense to you?
> >> >
> >> 
> >> The price for Usenet access is so low that it is essentially
> >> free.
> >> 
> >> I pay only $29.95 for an ENTIRE FUCKING YEAR.
> >
> > And for what? I pay what I do (well over $100 a month) for a fast 
> > internet connection because I derive value from it, need it to be
> > able to move large files quickly. Why value would I derive from
> > paying for Usenet... that I already get for free? 
> 
> It's much more comfortable experience then using free services which are
> limited. Eg crossposting, followups, text formating and such...

Crossposting and access to binaries are the only things I see 
missing that might matter to me. Personally, I don't miss either 
all that much, so there's no real value  I'm craving that I don't 
already have for free.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481848

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-12-22 16:19 +0000
Message-ID<WttTD.23569$Y03.16206@fx24.am4>
In reply to#481839
On 2018-12-22, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 12:04:08 PM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 1:33:48 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> 
>> >
>> > is the height of 
>> > efficiency from the end user viewpoint.
>> >
>> 
>> Even more efficient is the URL:
>> 
>> news:message-ID
>
> Not for someone who doesn't have access to binaries, which
> generally means you need to pay extra for Usenet access. Why
> would anyone pay extra for Usenet access when you can get
> it for free? This makes sense to you?
It's not that expensive, really...

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481852

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-22 08:22 -0800
Message-ID<150e30e6-e942-480c-87eb-2e538f269c43@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#481848
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 9:19:05 AM UTC-7, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On 2018-12-22, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 12:04:08 PM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 1:33:48 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> 
> >> >
> >> > is the height of 
> >> > efficiency from the end user viewpoint.
> >> >
> >> 
> >> Even more efficient is the URL:
> >> 
> >> news:message-ID
> >
> > Not for someone who doesn't have access to binaries, which
> > generally means you need to pay extra for Usenet access. Why
> > would anyone pay extra for Usenet access when you can get
> > it for free? This makes sense to you?
> It's not that expensive, really...

I agree it's not expensive... but that's not my point. If the only
value I derive from it is to smack fools like Feeb around, why
would I pay for that when I can do it for nothing? I wouldn't...
so I don't.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481861

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-12-22 16:41 +0000
Message-ID<XOtTD.24441$dd4.18620@fx37.am4>
In reply to#481852
On 2018-12-22, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 9:19:05 AM UTC-7, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> On 2018-12-22, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 12:04:08 PM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 1:33:48 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >
>> >> > is the height of 
>> >> > efficiency from the end user viewpoint.
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >> Even more efficient is the URL:
>> >> 
>> >> news:message-ID
>> >
>> > Not for someone who doesn't have access to binaries, which
>> > generally means you need to pay extra for Usenet access. Why
>> > would anyone pay extra for Usenet access when you can get
>> > it for free? This makes sense to you?
>> It's not that expensive, really...
>
> I agree it's not expensive... but that's not my point. If the only
> value I derive from it is to smack fools like Feeb around, why
> would I pay for that when I can do it for nothing? I wouldn't...
> so I don't.
This newsgroup is dead, but there are others... generally people don't
know about usenet and since ISP's dropped support there is no youth
comming into it. With us usenet will die... sadly...

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481889 — Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ).

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-12-22 10:57 -0800
SubjectLesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ).
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.22--10.57am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#481861
Branimir:
> Youth aren't comming to Usenet; sadly, it'll die with us.

Usenet, unix and C will be around long after 
lesser fads ( like Facebook and Java ) have died off.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481893 — Re: Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ).

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-12-22 19:48 +0000
SubjectRe: Lesser Fads ( like Facebook and Java ).
Message-ID<lywTD.53045$RW.5384@fx16.am4>
In reply to#481889
On 2018-12-22, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> Branimir:
>> Youth aren't comming to Usenet; sadly, it'll die with us.
>
> Usenet, unix and C will be around long after 
> lesser fads ( like Facebook and Java ) have died off.
Java is already dead.

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web