Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #477981 > unrolled thread

(OT) In Shocking News ...

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  (OT) In Shocking News ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 23:19 +0000
    Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 15:36 -0800
    Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-18 18:06 -0700
      Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 17:40 -0800
    Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-18 20:56 -0500
      Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 18:26 -0800
      Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 03:43 +0000
        Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-18 20:58 -0700
          Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 20:16 -0800
        Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 20:01 -0800
        Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-19 08:53 -0500
          Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 08:06 -0600
            Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-19 14:43 +0000
              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 06:56 -0800
              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 09:04 -0600
                Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-19 15:25 +0000
                  Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 09:43 -0600
                    Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-19 15:49 +0000
                      Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 10:15 -0600
                        Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 09:32 -0800
                        Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-19 17:42 +0000
                          Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:43 -0600
                          Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-21 19:20 -0500
                            Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:43 +0000
                              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 09:03 -0700
                              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-22 17:32 -0500
                                Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 23:50 +0000
                                  Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-25 18:20 -0500
                                    Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 09:24 -0600
                                    Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-26 16:20 +0000
                                      Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 10:27 -0600
                                      Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 09:00 -0800
                                Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 18:06 -0700
                                  Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 17:39 -0800
                                  Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 01:28 -0800
                            Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:15 -0600
                              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-26 16:32 +0000
                                Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 10:59 -0600
                                  Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-26 17:13 +0000
                                  Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 09:31 -0800
                                Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 10:02 -0800
                  Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 07:43 -0800
                  Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-21 19:19 -0500
              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-21 19:18 -0500
                Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:39 +0000
                  Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-22 17:31 -0500
                    Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 23:55 +0000
                      Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 23:53 -0800
                      Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-25 18:19 -0500
                        Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:16 -0600
                          Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-26 09:54 -0500
                            Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 07:11 -0800
                        Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-26 16:16 +0000
                          Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 10:26 -0600
                            Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-26 16:44 +0000
                          Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-28 15:15 -0500
            Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-19 10:02 -0700
            Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 02:59 +0000
              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-19 20:02 -0700
              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 02:10 -0800
              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 07:01 -0600
                Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 05:17 -0800
              Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 12:15 -0500
                Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:01 +0000
                Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:36 -0700
          Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 06:25 -0800
            Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 07:27 -0800
          Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-19 15:58 +0000
            Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 08:14 -0800
    Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-19 06:41 -0800
      Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-19 14:54 +0000
        Re: (OT) In Shocking News ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-19 08:07 -0800
      "Norway" is fighting back. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-19 18:29 -0800
        Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 18:54 -0800
          Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 19:57 -0800
        Re: "Norway" is fighting back. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 03:47 -0700
          Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 03:12 -0800
            Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 06:20 -0800
            Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:01 +0000
              Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 10:29 -0800
                Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 12:34 -0800
          Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 11:50 -0600
            Re: "Norway" is fighting back. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-11-20 18:00 +0000
              Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-20 13:16 -0800
                Re: "Norway" is fighting back. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 14:21 -0700
                Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 13:37 -0800
            Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:01 +0000
              Re: "Norway" is fighting back. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 17:30 -0600
          Rural states are more fiscally responsible. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-20 14:29 -0800
            Re: Rural states are more fiscally responsible. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 14:55 -0800

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

#477981 — (OT) In Shocking News ...

The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide 
elections in Georgia and Florida. I guess the candidate who gets the most 
votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.) The Democrats will have to change that 
for the next election. So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished 
on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three). I 
heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the 
President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the 
House, during the mid-term elections.

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#477984

On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 4:20:00 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote:
> The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide 
> elections in Georgia and Florida. I guess the candidate who gets the most 
> votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.) The Democrats will have to change that 
> for the next election. So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished 
> on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three). I 
> heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the 
> President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the 
> House, during the mid-term elections.
> 
> -- 
> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.



In spite of my experiences with openSUSE, I even now continue to use it for clients who have had problems with OS X. Steven Carroll shows that all of them are not automated because some of them tap into what DFS said in very specific ways that underscore they are a response, not just gibberish. Which can only be Steven Carroll. Did he think that was clever? 

Steven Carroll can't get anything else to work, either. 

I am not going to pretend DFS did not assist me with Windows and I am thankful for his guidance. Steven Carroll has DFS to study and should begin to act as if he knows something about it because of this... though he made an ass of himself when he first talked ;) With no proof at all, as is usual for Steven Carroll. 

-- 
E-commerce Simplified
http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_j3m3lg_whitepower
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477989

On 11/18/18 4:19 PM, RonB wrote:
> The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide
> elections in Georgia and Florida.

One rarely is "able" to do what one does not seek to do.

> I guess the candidate who gets the most
> votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.)

If that was true then Bush would have been beaten by Gore.

You also ignore how Republicans repeatedly seek to prevent people from 
voting.

> The Democrats will have to change that
> for the next election.

The disenfranchisement? In Florida the stopped some of it now.

> So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished
> on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three).

The Senate works much like the electoral college:

     The Electoral College is akin to affirmative action
     BUT less defensible because few of the people benefiting
     from the electoral college are unable to leave the group
     getting special entitlements.

> I
> heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the
> President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the
> House, during the mid-term elections.

But the Democrats have not had such a big gain since Watergate.



-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477992

On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 6:07:02 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 11/18/18 4:19 PM, RonB wrote:
> > The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide
> > elections in Georgia and Florida.
> 
> One rarely is "able" to do what one does not seek to do.
> 
> > I guess the candidate who gets the most
> > votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.)
> 
> If that was true then Bush would have been beaten by Gore.
> 
> You also ignore how Republicans repeatedly seek to prevent people from 
> voting.
> 
> > The Democrats will have to change that
> > for the next election.
> 
> The disenfranchisement? In Florida the stopped some of it now.
> 
> > So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished
> > on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three).
> 
> The Senate works much like the electoral college:
> 
>      The Electoral College is akin to affirmative action
>      BUT less defensible because few of the people benefiting
>      from the electoral college are unable to leave the group
>      getting special entitlements.
> 
> > I
> > heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the
> > President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the
> > House, during the mid-term elections.
> 
> But the Democrats have not had such a big gain since Watergate.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>



Yup. It seems this is what we have to deal with. Trolls who have no reason for being here other than to attack Snit. What Jeff-Relf.Me really means: His "debugging expertise" made it so he could not find an extension he wants that everyone else is already using with this application. This is what results when dangerously inferior faith in oneself takes over Jeff-Relf.Me's entire life. Linux offers the least to the least. 



--
Puppy Videos
http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything
https://redd.it/6sfkup
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477994

On 2018-11-18 6:19 p.m., RonB wrote:
> The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide
> elections in Georgia and Florida. I guess the candidate who gets the most
> votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.) The Democrats will have to change that
> for the next election. So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished
> on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three). I
> heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the
> President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the
> House, during the mid-term elections.

As far as I know, having Senate seats is more important than having 
House seats in this scenario because it still allows Trump to nominate 
and pass judges to the Supreme Court. Of course, I might be wrong.


-- 
SilverSlimer
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477996

On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 6:56:36 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-11-18 6:19 p.m., RonB wrote:
> > The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide
> > elections in Georgia and Florida. I guess the candidate who gets the most
> > votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.) The Democrats will have to change that
> > for the next election. So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished
> > on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three). I
> > heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the
> > President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the
> > House, during the mid-term elections.
> 
> As far as I know, having Senate seats is more important than having 
> House seats in this scenario because it still allows Trump to nominate 
> and pass judges to the Supreme Court. Of course, I might be wrong.
> 
> 
> -- 
> SilverSlimer
> Minds: @silverslimer



Now why the need to produce a screencast via an automated phone system in a super computer system? No matter, he didn't list this as part of his, what would undoubtedly be, self-serving 'standard' <shrug>. 

Steven Petruzzellis has a ton of insight to share and he apparently wants to provide screencasts to help others. Sadly this is maybe the worst group for doing that because too much of the responses are whining, word twisting, and other drivel. 

Steven Petruzzellis's computer has more scripts than Jonas Eklundh Communication's. Steven Petruzzellis wins. Jonas Eklundh Communication loses. Simple as that. It was Jonas Eklundh Communication who flooded Steven Petruzzellis's site hundreds of thousands of times and refused to admit it. 

When I was new here, I wanted to be reasonable and unbiased. I gave Jonas Eklundh Communication more than a wise person could be expected to. 

-- 
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/smzXrBhsWf4
http://prescottcomputerguy.com/screenflow
https://www.facebook.com/JonasEklundh
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477999

On 2018-11-19, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> On 2018-11-18 6:19 p.m., RonB wrote:
>> The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide
>> elections in Georgia and Florida. I guess the candidate who gets the most
>> votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.) The Democrats will have to change that
>> for the next election. So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished
>> on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three). I
>> heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the
>> President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the
>> House, during the mid-term elections.
>
> As far as I know, having Senate seats is more important than having 
> House seats in this scenario because it still allows Trump to nominate 
> and pass judges to the Supreme Court. Of course, I might be wrong.

No, I think you're right. And the aptly named Flake will be gone next time 
one of these votes comes up. 

I can't see much happening in Congress, as I don't see much indication that 
there will be any compromises in the next two years. Both parties will be 
angling for the advantage in the next election.

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478001

On 11/18/18 8:43 PM, RonB wrote:
> On 2018-11-19, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On 2018-11-18 6:19 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>> The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide
>>> elections in Georgia and Florida. I guess the candidate who gets the most
>>> votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.) The Democrats will have to change that
>>> for the next election. So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished
>>> on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three). I
>>> heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the
>>> President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the
>>> House, during the mid-term elections.
>>
>> As far as I know, having Senate seats is more important than having
>> House seats in this scenario because it still allows Trump to nominate
>> and pass judges to the Supreme Court. Of course, I might be wrong.
> 
> No, I think you're right. And the aptly named Flake will be gone next time
> one of these votes comes up.
> 
> I can't see much happening in Congress, as I don't see much indication that
> there will be any compromises in the next two years. Both parties will be
> angling for the advantage in the next election.
> 

True... and both parties will promote our oligarchy more than they should.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478003

On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 8:58:35 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 11/18/18 8:43 PM, RonB wrote:
> > On 2018-11-19, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >> On 2018-11-18 6:19 p.m., RonB wrote:
> >>> The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide
> >>> elections in Georgia and Florida. I guess the candidate who gets the most
> >>> votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.) The Democrats will have to change that
> >>> for the next election. So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished
> >>> on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three). I
> >>> heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the
> >>> President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the
> >>> House, during the mid-term elections.
> >>
> >> As far as I know, having Senate seats is more important than having
> >> House seats in this scenario because it still allows Trump to nominate
> >> and pass judges to the Supreme Court. Of course, I might be wrong.
> > 
> > No, I think you're right. And the aptly named Flake will be gone next time
> > one of these votes comes up.
> > 
> > I can't see much happening in Congress, as I don't see much indication that
> > there will be any compromises in the next two years. Both parties will be
> > angling for the advantage in the next election.
> > 
> 
> True... and both parties will promote our oligarchy more than they should.
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>



But John Gohde feels the need to insult the herd. 

A meaningless discourse by pseudo-experts, magnified by the reciprocal of an infinite twin prime, demonstrating the vast nothingness of the main character's so-called thought process. Hell, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in irony-quotes, because he is afraid of them) are focusing on Windows more than on Linux. 

--
Do not click this link!!
http://www.5z8.info/racist-raps_r6r3wf_best-russian-sites-for-bootleg-everything
https://youtu.be/qwb1Ez0GWMA
https://youtu.be/u4xD43Khhkw
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478002

On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 8:43:43 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote:
> On 2018-11-19, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> > On 2018-11-18 6:19 p.m., RonB wrote:
> >> The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide
> >> elections in Georgia and Florida. I guess the candidate who gets the most
> >> votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.) The Democrats will have to change that
> >> for the next election. So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished
> >> on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three). I
> >> heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the
> >> President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the
> >> House, during the mid-term elections.
> >
> > As far as I know, having Senate seats is more important than having 
> > House seats in this scenario because it still allows Trump to nominate 
> > and pass judges to the Supreme Court. Of course, I might be wrong.
> 
> No, I think you're right. And the aptly named Flake will be gone next time 
> one of these votes comes up. 
> 
> I can't see much happening in Congress, as I don't see much indication that 
> there will be any compromises in the next two years. Both parties will be 
> angling for the advantage in the next election.
> 
> -- 
> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.



The guy is as popular as bacon buttie at a Bar Mitzvah -- and with good cause. 

Lines of text containing your own words reflected in a funhouse mirror. 

By following 'media talking heads' like that you get moral imperatives like 'reverse racism'. Carried to its ultimate intent, the push that it's 'gross' for a straight male to not wish to have sex with a goat is created. So he changed his story to talking about his family. So, yeah, I buy into my own fantasy, fully knowing Klaus Schadenfreude has been fooled, because it makes me reconsider my code, improving it. Can you get vallor to agree? I can tell Klaus Schadenfreude does not even know what is wrong with the MSM. 

After yesterday's update I no longer have to issue 'pulseaudio -k' every time I login ;) 

-- 
E-commerce Simplified
https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478039

On 2018-11-18 10:43 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2018-11-19, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On 2018-11-18 6:19 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>> The Democrats were unable to steal a single one of the three state-wide
>>> elections in Georgia and Florida. I guess the candidate who gets the most
>>> votes still wins? (Shocking, I know.) The Democrats will have to change that
>>> for the next election. So when the Mississippi runoff election is finished
>>> on the 27th, the Republicans will have 54 Senate seats (a gain of three). I
>>> heard on the radio that only three times in the past century has the
>>> President's party gained seats in the Senate, while losing seats in the
>>> House, during the mid-term elections.
>>
>> As far as I know, having Senate seats is more important than having
>> House seats in this scenario because it still allows Trump to nominate
>> and pass judges to the Supreme Court. Of course, I might be wrong.
> 
> No, I think you're right. And the aptly named Flake will be gone next time
> one of these votes comes up.

As far as I know, he already announced that he was retiring so I guess 
he no longer cares about showing the world that in reality, he's a 
Democrat and always has been.

> I can't see much happening in Congress, as I don't see much indication that
> there will be any compromises in the next two years. Both parties will be
> angling for the advantage in the next election.

Well, the Democrats are already announcing a shitload of investigation 
into inconsequential things relating to Trump so it's clear they're not 
worried about wasting the public's money... money imbeciles like Snit 
believe they constantly use to improve the life of the poor. In fact, 
that's why there was _no_ poverty at all during Obama's reign.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478040

SilverSlimer wrote:

>As far as I know, he already announced that he was retiring so I guess 
>he no longer cares about showing the world that in reality, he's a 
>Democrat and always has been.

Notice how right-wingers will even attack their own, if they dare
stray from the party line.

-- 
"Pretty much just described your herd who thinks you have to be 100%
with Linux or you are evil."  -  some thing, lying shamelessly (but no
one can quote it lying)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478045

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
>>As far as I know, he already announced that he was retiring so I guess 
>>he no longer cares about showing the world that in reality, he's a 
>>Democrat and always has been.
> 
> Notice how right-wingers will even attack their own, if they dare
> stray from the party line.
> 

It's called intellectual honesty.  Contrast that with the Democrats' fake
intersectionality rainbow designed to create a coalition of "others" who
would kill each other if they ever found themselves in the same room.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478048

On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 7:43:25 AM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> > SilverSlimer wrote:
> > 
> >>As far as I know, he already announced that he was retiring so I guess 
> >>he no longer cares about showing the world that in reality, he's a 
> >>Democrat and always has been.
> > 
> > Notice how right-wingers will even attack their own, if they dare
> > stray from the party line.
> > 
> 
> It's called intellectual honesty.  Contrast that with the Democrats' fake
> intersectionality rainbow designed to create a coalition of "others" who
> would kill each other if they ever found themselves in the same room.



You're clueless! 

Playing with SC... still a greenhorn... Ending support for DOS programs is what it comes down to. Who *doesn't* know that this kind of bunk is Jeff-Relf.Me's approach, not the MO of Klaus Schadenfreude? It's all just nonsense... the trolling, the posting with Klaus Schadenfreude's name, the writing of drivel, the outbursts... the false bravado and tendency to show how flustered he is over being banned from the schoolyard for shitting in it again... Jeff-Relf.Me can not help himself. How is bash on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? And in reply you have nothing but an attempt to start a circus. 



-- 
Best CMS Solution of 2017
http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM
https://youtu.be/u4xD43Khhkw
http://www.5z8.info/creditscore_g7f8du_launchexe
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478049

owl wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> 
>>>As far as I know, he already announced that he was retiring so I guess 
>>>he no longer cares about showing the world that in reality, he's a 
>>>Democrat and always has been.
>> 
>> Notice how right-wingers will even attack their own, if they dare
>> stray from the party line.
>
>It's called intellectual honesty.  

Sure.

"Does not always hew the party line" -> "A Democrat and always has
been".

Real "honest".

About as "honest" as Slimer's "Democrats ARE Communists" claim.

>Contrast that with the Democrats' fake
>intersectionality rainbow designed to create a coalition of "others" who
>would kill each other if they ever found themselves in the same room.

Even if true, so what?

In other political systems, there are a greater number of viable
parties, and the parties form coalitions.  In the US, there is little
choice but to band together into one of the two big parties.

-- 
"Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right
to vote, SO BE IT."  -  Silver "I'm not an extremist" Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478053

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> owl wrote:
> 
>>Contrast that with the Democrats' fake
>>intersectionality rainbow designed to create a coalition of "others" who
>>would kill each other if they ever found themselves in the same room.
> 
> Even if true, so what?
> 

Because if, for the success of the socialist agenda, you would join
hands with someone who would rather see you dead, then not only do
you have no principles -- you have no sanity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478056

owl wrote:

>chrisv wrote:
>>
>> owl wrote:
>> 
>>>Contrast that with the Democrats' fake
>>>intersectionality rainbow designed to create a coalition of "others" who
>>>would kill each other if they ever found themselves in the same room.
>> 
>> Even if true, so what?
>
>Because if, for the success of the socialist agenda, you would join
>hands with someone who would rather see you dead, then not only do
>you have no principles -- you have no sanity.

You are basing your conclusions on a ridiculous exaggeration.  A false
claim, in other words.  Where are your principles?

I let it go, the first time, thinking to so obvious that it didnt need
to be pointed-out.  I guess I was wrong.

-- 
Advocate:  Open source software competes and wins on its own merits

Dumfsck, lying shamelessly:  If that was true, it would have a price
tag attached.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478059

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> owl wrote:
> 
>>chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> owl wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Contrast that with the Democrats' fake
>>>>intersectionality rainbow designed to create a coalition of "others" who
>>>>would kill each other if they ever found themselves in the same room.
>>> 
>>> Even if true, so what?
>>
>>Because if, for the success of the socialist agenda, you would join
>>hands with someone who would rather see you dead, then not only do
>>you have no principles -- you have no sanity.
> 
> You are basing your conclusions on a ridiculous exaggeration.  A false
> claim, in other words.  Where are your principles?
> 

Freedom.

> I let it go, the first time, thinking to so obvious that it didnt need
> to be pointed-out.  I guess I was wrong.
> 

What were you wrong about this time?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478065

owl wrote:

>> You are basing your conclusions on a ridiculous exaggeration.  A false
>> claim, in other words.  Where are your principles?
>
>Freedom.

The freedom to use false claims to attack your political opponents,
apparently.

-- 
"To save face with his sham pals, chrisv just doubles-down on his
false attacks."  -  lying asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478086

On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 9:15:06 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> owl wrote:
> 
> >> You are basing your conclusions on a ridiculous exaggeration.  A false
> >> claim, in other words.  Where are your principles?
> >
> >Freedom.
> 
> The freedom to use false claims to attack your political opponents,
> apparently.
> 
> -- 
> "To save face with his sham pals, chrisv just doubles-down on his
> false attacks."  -  lying asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly



I am devotee of Windows, because that's where all the exciting innovation is happening. I have worked in or with the PC design industry for more than 25 years. I have served multinational OEMs working with government agencies and green technology industries. Never was I at any point under a contractual obligation not to pre-install any OS we wanted. We sold Netware, Amiga, IRIX, and more in addition to Microsoft OSs very successfully. 

So, yeah, I buy into my own fantasy, fully knowing Desk 'The Flooder' Rabbit has been fooled, because it makes me reconsider my program, improving it. And what did Desk 'The Flooder' Rabbit have to say about this amazing support from new posters? Most of the time he would try to lead the reader to trust they're real people who just happened to have unexplained agreement with him. Yeah, right! 

-- 
My Snoring Solution!!
Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy
http://prescottcomputerguy.com
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web