Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #240021 > unrolled thread

OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-24 13:39 -0400
    Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-24 15:38 -0600
      Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-24 19:48 -0400
        Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-24 17:31 -0700
          Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-24 22:45 -0400
            Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-24 20:48 -0700
              Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-25 11:16 -0400
                Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 11:22 -0400
                  Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 08:38 -0700
                  Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-25 17:47 +0200
                  Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-25 12:07 -0400
                    Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 09:24 -0700
                    Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 12:55 -0400
                      Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-25 13:20 -0400
                        Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-25 11:46 -0600
                          Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 12:35 -0700
                            Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-25 15:50 -0600
                              Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 15:05 -0700
                                Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-25 17:00 -0600
                                  Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 16:15 -0700
                          Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-04-25 12:39 -0700
                            Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 15:43 -0400
                              Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 14:33 -0700
                          Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-25 17:31 -0400
                            Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 15:09 -0700
                        Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 14:05 -0400
                          Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 12:36 -0700
                        Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 12:32 -0700
                      Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 12:38 -0700
                        Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-25 15:51 -0600
                          Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 17:53 -0400
                            Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 15:06 -0700
                            Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-25 17:01 -0600
                              Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 16:14 -0700
                          Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 15:05 -0700
                Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 08:36 -0700
                Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 08:40 -0700
    Re: OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-24 17:37 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#240021 — OT: Aborted Babies Incinerated in Oregon to Provide Electricity

Snatch the Clown believes that shutting down coal plants and replacing 
them with ones which burn aborted babies is a lot better for Mother Earth.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/canadian-aborted-babies-incinerated-in-oregon-waste-to-energy-facility-to-p.html
-- 
Silver Slimer
Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#240035

On 4/24/2014 11:39 AM, Silver Slimer wrote:
> Snatch the Clown believes that shutting down coal plants and replacing
> them with ones which burn aborted babies is a lot better for Mother Earth.
> 
> http://www.lifesitenews.com/canadian-aborted-babies-incinerated-in-oregon-waste-to-energy-facility-to-p.html
> 

Of course snatch the clown is nutso.
He should be first in line to burn his kids if he believes it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240039

On 2014-04-24 5:38 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
> On 4/24/2014 11:39 AM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>> Snatch the Clown believes that shutting down coal plants and replacing
>> them with ones which burn aborted babies is a lot better for Mother Earth.
>>
>> http://www.lifesitenews.com/canadian-aborted-babies-incinerated-in-oregon-waste-to-energy-facility-to-p.html
>>
>
> Of course snatch the clown is nutso.
> He should be first in line to burn his kids if he believes it.

In the new America, every single person needs to pull their own weight 
and that includes unborn babies being burned to power factories. Who 
needs freedom and morality when you can burn "waste" like human beings 
to power your Usenet trolling equipment?

-- 
Silver Slimer
Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240042

On 4/24/14, 4:48 PM, in article ljc7ri$6ib$3@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:

> On 2014-04-24 5:38 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
>> On 4/24/2014 11:39 AM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>> Snatch the Clown believes that shutting down coal plants and replacing
>>> them with ones which burn aborted babies is a lot better for Mother Earth.
>>> 
>>> http://www.lifesitenews.com/canadian-aborted-babies-incinerated-in-oregon-wa
>>> ste-to-energy-facility-to-p.html
>>> 
>> 
>> Of course snatch the clown is nutso.
>> He should be first in line to burn his kids if he believes it.
> 
> In the new America, every single person needs to pull their own weight
> and that includes unborn babies being burned to power factories. Who
> needs freedom and morality when you can burn "waste" like human beings
> to power your Usenet trolling equipment?

Freedom and morality are important to me... but I think it is good you are
acknowledging they are not to you. At least in that you are being honest
(even if you meant it as an attack on others).


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240058

On 2014-04-24 8:31 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 4/24/14, 4:48 PM, in article ljc7ri$6ib$3@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
> <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-04-24 5:38 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
>>> On 4/24/2014 11:39 AM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>> Snatch the Clown believes that shutting down coal plants and replacing
>>>> them with ones which burn aborted babies is a lot better for Mother Earth.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.lifesitenews.com/canadian-aborted-babies-incinerated-in-oregon-wa
>>>> ste-to-energy-facility-to-p.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> Of course snatch the clown is nutso.
>>> He should be first in line to burn his kids if he believes it.
>>
>> In the new America, every single person needs to pull their own weight
>> and that includes unborn babies being burned to power factories. Who
>> needs freedom and morality when you can burn "waste" like human beings
>> to power your Usenet trolling equipment?
>
> Freedom and morality are important to me... but I think it is good you are
> acknowledging they are not to you. At least in that you are being honest
> (even if you meant it as an attack on others).

Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the Smiling Black 
Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone before 
him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for you? FUCK 
IT, OBAMACARE.

Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking 
hypocrite retard.

-- 
Silver Slimer
Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240067

On 4/24/14, 7:45 PM, in article ljci90$tbn$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:

... 
>>>> Of course snatch the clown is nutso.
>>>> He should be first in line to burn his kids if he believes it.
>>> 
>>> In the new America, every single person needs to pull their own weight
>>> and that includes unborn babies being burned to power factories. Who
>>> needs freedom and morality when you can burn "waste" like human beings
>>> to power your Usenet trolling equipment?
>> 
>> Freedom and morality are important to me... but I think it is good you are
>> acknowledging they are not to you. At least in that you are being honest
>> (even if you meant it as an attack on others).
> 
> Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the Smiling Black
> Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone before
> him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for you? FUCK
> IT, OBAMACARE.
> 
> Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking
> hypocrite retard.

See: nonsense attacks from you because even you know you have nothing of
value to say.

Oh, and you might want to learn about ObamaCare before you put it down. :)

-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240098

On 2014-04-24 11:48 PM, Snit wrote:

>> Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the Smiling Black
>> Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone before
>> him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for you? FUCK
>> IT, OBAMACARE.
>>
>> Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking
>> hypocrite retard.
>
> See: nonsense attacks from you because even you know you have nothing of
> value to say.
>
> Oh, and you might want to learn about ObamaCare before you put it down. :)

Does it cancel existing health care plans? You said "no" yet this 
article says it does: 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-hurdle-for-obamacare.html

As does this one: 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/12/obamacare-canceled-policy-fixes-obama-clinton/3509073/

And this one: http://obamacarefacts.com/health-insurance-cancellation.php

This despite the fact that Obama promised, over and over, that he would 
not cancel it: 
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+you+can+keep+your+insurance

You also said that it does not increase insurance costs for people, 
despite the fact that in one state alone, it increases it up to 80%: 
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/miarticle.htm?id=9300#.U1p70GxOXIU

There are even websites dedicated to sharing horror stories about price 
increases.

Is it ethical to increase prices? No. Is it constitutional to force 
people to buy into it? No. But you're a liberal twat who'd bend over for 
Obama no matter what.

Now go fuck yourself, spermrag.

-- 
Silver Slimer
Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240100

On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:16:22 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:

> On 2014-04-24 11:48 PM, Snit wrote:
> 
>>> Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the Smiling Black
>>> Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone before
>>> him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for you? FUCK
>>> IT, OBAMACARE.
>>>
>>> Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking
>>> hypocrite retard.
>>
>> See: nonsense attacks from you because even you know you have nothing of
>> value to say.
>>
>> Oh, and you might want to learn about ObamaCare before you put it down. :)
> 
> Does it cancel existing health care plans? You said "no" yet this 
> article says it does: 
> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-hurdle-for-obamacare.html
> 
> As does this one: 
> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/12/obamacare-canceled-policy-fixes-obama-clinton/3509073/
> 
> And this one: http://obamacarefacts.com/health-insurance-cancellation.php
> 
> This despite the fact that Obama promised, over and over, that he would 
> not cancel it: 
> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+you+can+keep+your+insurance
> 
> You also said that it does not increase insurance costs for people, 
> despite the fact that in one state alone, it increases it up to 80%: 
> http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/miarticle.htm?id=9300#.U1p70GxOXIU
> 
> There are even websites dedicated to sharing horror stories about price 
> increases.
> 
> Is it ethical to increase prices? No. Is it constitutional to force 
> people to buy into it? No. But you're a liberal twat who'd bend over for 
> Obama no matter what.
> 
> Now go fuck yourself, spermrag.

You should ignore the Communist Snatch Clown.
He will never go away if he keeps getting fed.
If you want to post contrary posts, create a new post, don't mention
Snatch Clown and completely ignore the Snatch Clown's replies.
It will drive him crazy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240104

On 4/25/14, 8:22 AM, in article 2l9my0xwxozq.r16yolux2000$.dlg@40tude.net,
"flatfish+++" <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:16:22 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
>> On 2014-04-24 11:48 PM, Snit wrote:
>> 
>>>> Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the Smiling Black
>>>> Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone before
>>>> him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for you? FUCK
>>>> IT, OBAMACARE.
>>>> 
>>>> Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking
>>>> hypocrite retard.
>>> 
>>> See: nonsense attacks from you because even you know you have nothing of
>>> value to say.
>>> 
>>> Oh, and you might want to learn about ObamaCare before you put it down. :)
>> 
>> Does it cancel existing health care plans? You said "no" yet this
>> article says it does:
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-h
>> urdle-for-obamacare.html
>> 
>> As does this one:
>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/12/obamacare-canceled-pol
>> icy-fixes-obama-clinton/3509073/
>> 
>> And this one: http://obamacarefacts.com/health-insurance-cancellation.php
>> 
>> This despite the fact that Obama promised, over and over, that he would
>> not cancel it: 
>> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+you+can+keep+your+insurance
>> 
>> You also said that it does not increase insurance costs for people,
>> despite the fact that in one state alone, it increases it up to 80%:
>> http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/miarticle.htm?id=9300#.U1p70GxOXIU
>> 
>> There are even websites dedicated to sharing horror stories about price
>> increases.
>> 
>> Is it ethical to increase prices? No. Is it constitutional to force
>> people to buy into it? No. But you're a liberal twat who'd bend over for
>> Obama no matter what.
>> 
>> Now go fuck yourself, spermrag.
> 
> You should ignore the Communist Snatch Clown.
> He will never go away if he keeps getting fed.
> If you want to post contrary posts, create a new post, don't mention
> Snatch Clown and completely ignore the Snatch Clown's replies.
> It will drive him crazy.

It drives him crazy to know how amazingly wrong he is. Heck, even on stuff
based on basic definitions, such as "negative reinforcement" he cannot admit
when he is wrong.

He has slipped into Peter Köhlmann territory... except unlike Peter, Silver
Slimer is racist. Just sad.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240109

flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:16:22 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:
>
>> On 2014-04-24 11:48 PM, Snit wrote:
>> 
>>>> Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the Smiling Black
>>>> Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone before
>>>> him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for you? FUCK
>>>> IT, OBAMACARE.
>>>>
>>>> Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking
>>>> hypocrite retard.
>>>
>>> See: nonsense attacks from you because even you know you have nothing of
>>> value to say.
>>>
>>> Oh, and you might want to learn about ObamaCare before you put it down. :)
>> 
>> Does it cancel existing health care plans? You said "no" yet this 
>> article says it does: 
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-hurdle-for-obamacare.html
>> 
>> As does this one: 
>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/12/obamacare-canceled-policy-fixes-obama-clinton/3509073/
>> 
>> And this one: http://obamacarefacts.com/health-insurance-cancellation.php
>> 
>> This despite the fact that Obama promised, over and over, that he would 
>> not cancel it: 
>> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+you+can+keep+your+insurance
>> 
>> You also said that it does not increase insurance costs for people, 
>> despite the fact that in one state alone, it increases it up to 80%: 
>> http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/miarticle.htm?id=9300#.U1p70GxOXIU
>> 
>> There are even websites dedicated to sharing horror stories about price 
>> increases.
>> 
>> Is it ethical to increase prices? No. Is it constitutional to force 
>> people to buy into it? No. But you're a liberal twat who'd bend over for 
>> Obama no matter what.
>> 
>> Now go fuck yourself, spermrag.
>
> You should ignore the Communist Snatch Clown.
> He will never go away if he keeps getting fed.
> If you want to post contrary posts, create a new post, don't mention
> Snatch Clown and completely ignore the Snatch Clown's replies.
> It will drive him crazy.

Why are you posing as FF?

-- 
"I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." 
The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree.
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240119

On 2014-04-25 11:22 AM,  flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:16:22 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:
>
>> On 2014-04-24 11:48 PM, Snit wrote:
>>
>>>> Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the Smiling Black
>>>> Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone before
>>>> him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for you? FUCK
>>>> IT, OBAMACARE.
>>>>
>>>> Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking
>>>> hypocrite retard.
>>>
>>> See: nonsense attacks from you because even you know you have nothing of
>>> value to say.
>>>
>>> Oh, and you might want to learn about ObamaCare before you put it down. :)
>>
>> Does it cancel existing health care plans? You said "no" yet this
>> article says it does:
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-hurdle-for-obamacare.html
>>
>> As does this one:
>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/12/obamacare-canceled-policy-fixes-obama-clinton/3509073/
>>
>> And this one: http://obamacarefacts.com/health-insurance-cancellation.php
>>
>> This despite the fact that Obama promised, over and over, that he would
>> not cancel it:
>> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+you+can+keep+your+insurance
>>
>> You also said that it does not increase insurance costs for people,
>> despite the fact that in one state alone, it increases it up to 80%:
>> http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/miarticle.htm?id=9300#.U1p70GxOXIU
>>
>> There are even websites dedicated to sharing horror stories about price
>> increases.
>>
>> Is it ethical to increase prices? No. Is it constitutional to force
>> people to buy into it? No. But you're a liberal twat who'd bend over for
>> Obama no matter what.
>>
>> Now go fuck yourself, spermrag.
>
> You should ignore the Communist Snatch Clown.
> He will never go away if he keeps getting fed.
> If you want to post contrary posts, create a new post, don't mention
> Snatch Clown and completely ignore the Snatch Clown's replies.
> It will drive him crazy.

I had him ignored before, but I couldn't help but notice that everyone 
just started responding to the communist spermrag in my place. I guess I 
can filter him again though.

-- 
Silver Slimer
Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240126

On 4/25/14, 9:07 AM, in article lje184$pfp$6@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:

>> You should ignore the Communist Snatch Clown.
>> He will never go away if he keeps getting fed.
>> If you want to post contrary posts, create a new post, don't mention
>> Snatch Clown and completely ignore the Snatch Clown's replies.
>> It will drive him crazy.
> 
> I had him ignored before, but I couldn't help but notice that everyone
> just started responding to the communist spermrag in my place. I guess I
> can filter him again though.

Given how your primary responses to me are to lie and spew baseless attacks,
it might be best for everyone. We can just leave it with this being the end
of our primary discussions:

* A point was made specific to Texas. I asked for details.
- You lie about me thinking Texas is not a part of the U.S. In short
  you know you have nothing to back the specific point made (no other
  reason for you to run so fast!)

* The video on the NRA stands unrefuted.
- You lie about it not having falsifiable info. It does.
  No reason to think it is not right on those claims.

* The Cliven Bundy nonsense where a trespassing thief is demanding
  government handouts and arguing against the right to bear arms as he
  denies the existence of this government but runs around carrying the
  U.S. flag! He also spews tons of racist nonsense. Add to that the
  right-wing Christian terrorists backing this moron and you have all
  kinds of crazy wrapped up in one bat-shit crazy package.
- You lie and claim that the fact he is getting attention shows he is
  not spewing nonsense. Completely irrational. Then you sink to name
  calling and personal attacks. Your typical "out" when you know you
  are wrong.
  
* ObamaCare: hardly perfect but clearly a huge step forward for the
  country.
- You lie about it being unconstitutional and then sink to racist
  nonsense.

* You spew racist nonsense.
- You say this is fine because you do not feel racist and it is not
  illegal for you to be one. You are a racist. Period.
  
* Canada being liberal *compared to the U.S.*: this is clearly true
  given how the Canadian public repeatedly shows support for the
  Democratic candidate in U.S. elections (generally by a wide margin)
- You deny I am right as you show you cannot understand what is being
  said, and then jump to your insults.
  
* You spoke of the *adding* of something as "negative" reinforcement,
  the "negative" in the context of "negative reinforcement"
  specifically refers to the *removal* of something. You simply are
  wrong, by the definition of the terms being used.
- You deny it and spew your typical attacks.

Peter Köhlmann has been a good teacher to you - though he does not spew the
racist crap you do. In that way he is much better than you.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240128

On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:07:41 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:

> On 2014-04-25 11:22 AM,  flatfish+++ wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:16:22 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014-04-24 11:48 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the Smiling Black
>>>>> Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone before
>>>>> him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for you? FUCK
>>>>> IT, OBAMACARE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking
>>>>> hypocrite retard.
>>>>
>>>> See: nonsense attacks from you because even you know you have nothing of
>>>> value to say.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and you might want to learn about ObamaCare before you put it down. :)
>>>
>>> Does it cancel existing health care plans? You said "no" yet this
>>> article says it does:
>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-hurdle-for-obamacare.html
>>>
>>> As does this one:
>>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/12/obamacare-canceled-policy-fixes-obama-clinton/3509073/
>>>
>>> And this one: http://obamacarefacts.com/health-insurance-cancellation.php
>>>
>>> This despite the fact that Obama promised, over and over, that he would
>>> not cancel it:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+you+can+keep+your+insurance
>>>
>>> You also said that it does not increase insurance costs for people,
>>> despite the fact that in one state alone, it increases it up to 80%:
>>> http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/miarticle.htm?id=9300#.U1p70GxOXIU
>>>
>>> There are even websites dedicated to sharing horror stories about price
>>> increases.
>>>
>>> Is it ethical to increase prices? No. Is it constitutional to force
>>> people to buy into it? No. But you're a liberal twat who'd bend over for
>>> Obama no matter what.
>>>
>>> Now go fuck yourself, spermrag.
>>
>> You should ignore the Communist Snatch Clown.
>> He will never go away if he keeps getting fed.
>> If you want to post contrary posts, create a new post, don't mention
>> Snatch Clown and completely ignore the Snatch Clown's replies.
>> It will drive him crazy.
> 
> I had him ignored before, but I couldn't help but notice that everyone 
> just started responding to the communist spermrag in my place. I guess I 
> can filter him again though.

Don't bin him.
Just don't reply to Snatch Clown.

He's just trying to bait you into one of his circus rings.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240130

On 2014-04-25 12:55 PM,  flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:07:41 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:
>
>> On 2014-04-25 11:22 AM,  flatfish+++ wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:16:22 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2014-04-24 11:48 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the Smiling Black
>>>>>> Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone before
>>>>>> him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for you? FUCK
>>>>>> IT, OBAMACARE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking
>>>>>> hypocrite retard.
>>>>>
>>>>> See: nonsense attacks from you because even you know you have nothing of
>>>>> value to say.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, and you might want to learn about ObamaCare before you put it down. :)
>>>>
>>>> Does it cancel existing health care plans? You said "no" yet this
>>>> article says it does:
>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-hurdle-for-obamacare.html
>>>>
>>>> As does this one:
>>>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/12/obamacare-canceled-policy-fixes-obama-clinton/3509073/
>>>>
>>>> And this one: http://obamacarefacts.com/health-insurance-cancellation.php
>>>>
>>>> This despite the fact that Obama promised, over and over, that he would
>>>> not cancel it:
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+you+can+keep+your+insurance
>>>>
>>>> You also said that it does not increase insurance costs for people,
>>>> despite the fact that in one state alone, it increases it up to 80%:
>>>> http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/miarticle.htm?id=9300#.U1p70GxOXIU
>>>>
>>>> There are even websites dedicated to sharing horror stories about price
>>>> increases.
>>>>
>>>> Is it ethical to increase prices? No. Is it constitutional to force
>>>> people to buy into it? No. But you're a liberal twat who'd bend over for
>>>> Obama no matter what.
>>>>
>>>> Now go fuck yourself, spermrag.
>>>
>>> You should ignore the Communist Snatch Clown.
>>> He will never go away if he keeps getting fed.
>>> If you want to post contrary posts, create a new post, don't mention
>>> Snatch Clown and completely ignore the Snatch Clown's replies.
>>> It will drive him crazy.
>>
>> I had him ignored before, but I couldn't help but notice that everyone
>> just started responding to the communist spermrag in my place. I guess I
>> can filter him again though.
>
> Don't bin him.
> Just don't reply to Snatch Clown.
>
> He's just trying to bait you into one of his circus rings.

Binning him is so much easier. None of what he says is worth anything. I 
mean the guy wants me to refute a renowned scholar like Jon Stewart.


-- 
Silver Slimer
Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240136

On 4/25/2014 11:20 AM, Silver Slimer wrote:
> On 2014-04-25 12:55 PM,  flatfish+++ wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:07:41 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014-04-25 11:22 AM,  flatfish+++ wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:16:22 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2014-04-24 11:48 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meanwhile you pride yourself in our undying support of the
>>>>>>> Smiling Black
>>>>>>> Man who has done more to limit Americans' freedoms than anyone
>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>> him. Freedom to choose a health care provider which works for
>>>>>>> you? FUCK
>>>>>>> IT, OBAMACARE.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Forcing Obamacare on everyone was neither moral or free you fucking
>>>>>>> hypocrite retard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See: nonsense attacks from you because even you know you have
>>>>>> nothing of
>>>>>> value to say.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, and you might want to learn about ObamaCare before you put it
>>>>>> down. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it cancel existing health care plans? You said "no" yet this
>>>>> article says it does:
>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-hurdle-for-obamacare.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As does this one:
>>>>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/12/obamacare-canceled-policy-fixes-obama-clinton/3509073/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And this one:
>>>>> http://obamacarefacts.com/health-insurance-cancellation.php
>>>>>
>>>>> This despite the fact that Obama promised, over and over, that he
>>>>> would
>>>>> not cancel it:
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+you+can+keep+your+insurance
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You also said that it does not increase insurance costs for people,
>>>>> despite the fact that in one state alone, it increases it up to 80%:
>>>>> http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/miarticle.htm?id=9300#.U1p70GxOXIU
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There are even websites dedicated to sharing horror stories about
>>>>> price
>>>>> increases.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it ethical to increase prices? No. Is it constitutional to force
>>>>> people to buy into it? No. But you're a liberal twat who'd bend
>>>>> over for
>>>>> Obama no matter what.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now go fuck yourself, spermrag.
>>>>
>>>> You should ignore the Communist Snatch Clown.
>>>> He will never go away if he keeps getting fed.
>>>> If you want to post contrary posts, create a new post, don't mention
>>>> Snatch Clown and completely ignore the Snatch Clown's replies.
>>>> It will drive him crazy.
>>>
>>> I had him ignored before, but I couldn't help but notice that everyone
>>> just started responding to the communist spermrag in my place. I guess I
>>> can filter him again though.
>>
>> Don't bin him.
>> Just don't reply to Snatch Clown.
>>
>> He's just trying to bait you into one of his circus rings.
> 
> Binning him is so much easier. None of what he says is worth anything. I
> mean the guy wants me to refute a renowned scholar like Jon Stewart.
> 
> 
So now he's thinking that the comic Jon Stewart is now credible?

LOL!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240150

On 4/25/14, 10:46 AM, in article
dvOdnZcx5ZTuAsfOnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com>
wrote:

>>> Don't bin him.
>>> Just don't reply to Snatch Clown.
>>> 
>>> He's just trying to bait you into one of his circus rings.
>> 
>> Binning him is so much easier. None of what he says is worth anything. I
>> mean the guy wants me to refute a renowned scholar like Jon Stewart.
>> 
>> 
> So now he's thinking that the comic Jon Stewart is now credible?
> 
> LOL!!!

I am noting his comments are unrefuted... and, with video and the like, well
supported:

http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/bundy-blm/daily-show-host-stewart-takes-sh
ots-bundy

http://mediamatters.org/video/2014/04/22/watch-the-daily-show-demolish-hanni
tys-hypocrit/198963

http://uproxx.com/tv/2014/04/sean-hannity-challenged-jon-stewart-to-a-fight-
over-cliven-bundy-and-jon-stewart-cold-knocked-his-ass-out/

But you and Silver Slimer have a *great* rebuttal... comes down to
"Wahhhhhhh!"

LOL! Really, do you have anything other than whining about the source?
Anything to even suggest you understand the situation? The four videos at
those three links are excellent and describe the situation very well.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240166

On 4/25/2014 1:35 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 4/25/14, 10:46 AM, in article
> dvOdnZcx5ZTuAsfOnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>>> Don't bin him.
>>>> Just don't reply to Snatch Clown.
>>>>
>>>> He's just trying to bait you into one of his circus rings.
>>>
>>> Binning him is so much easier. None of what he says is worth anything. I
>>> mean the guy wants me to refute a renowned scholar like Jon Stewart.
>>>
>>>
>> So now he's thinking that the comic Jon Stewart is now credible?
>>
>> LOL!!!
> 
> I am noting his comments are unrefuted... and, with video and the like, well
> supported:
> 
> http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/bundy-blm/daily-show-host-stewart-takes-sh
> ots-bundy
> 
> http://mediamatters.org/video/2014/04/22/watch-the-daily-show-demolish-hanni
> tys-hypocrit/198963
> 
> http://uproxx.com/tv/2014/04/sean-hannity-challenged-jon-stewart-to-a-fight-
> over-cliven-bundy-and-jon-stewart-cold-knocked-his-ass-out/
> 
> But you and Silver Slimer have a *great* rebuttal... comes down to
> "Wahhhhhhh!"
> 
> LOL! Really, do you have anything other than whining about the source?
> Anything to even suggest you understand the situation? The four videos at
> those three links are excellent and describe the situation very well.
> 
> 
Guffaw!!!  Yet dummies like you now accept a standup comic as THE
authority??  Mostly the reasons why he is not refuted is maybe no one is
taking the guy seriously.
Of course stupid people like you would believe the management media on
anything they broadcast as the gospel truth, eh?

LOL!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240178

On 4/25/14, 2:50 PM, in article
j7GdnVQl0LEPRcfOnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com>
wrote:

> On 4/25/2014 1:35 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 4/25/14, 10:46 AM, in article
>> dvOdnZcx5ZTuAsfOnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> Don't bin him.
>>>>> Just don't reply to Snatch Clown.
>>>>> 
>>>>> He's just trying to bait you into one of his circus rings.
>>>> 
>>>> Binning him is so much easier. None of what he says is worth anything. I
>>>> mean the guy wants me to refute a renowned scholar like Jon Stewart.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> So now he's thinking that the comic Jon Stewart is now credible?
>>> 
>>> LOL!!!
>> 
>> I am noting his comments are unrefuted... and, with video and the like, well
>> supported:
>> 
>> http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/bundy-blm/daily-show-host-stewart-takes-sh
>> ots-bundy
>> 
>> http://mediamatters.org/video/2014/04/22/watch-the-daily-show-demolish-hanni
>> tys-hypocrit/198963
>> 
>> http://uproxx.com/tv/2014/04/sean-hannity-challenged-jon-stewart-to-a-fight-
>> over-cliven-bundy-and-jon-stewart-cold-knocked-his-ass-out/
>> 
>> But you and Silver Slimer have a *great* rebuttal... comes down to
>> "Wahhhhhhh!"
>> 
>> LOL! Really, do you have anything other than whining about the source?
>> Anything to even suggest you understand the situation? The four videos at
>> those three links are excellent and describe the situation very well.
>> 
>> 
> Guffaw!!!  Yet dummies like you now accept a standup comic as THE
> authority??  Mostly the reasons why he is not refuted is maybe no one is
> taking the guy seriously.
> Of course stupid people like you would believe the management media on
> anything they broadcast as the gospel truth, eh?
> 
> LOL!!!
> 

No rebuttal from you. His videos stand fully unrefuted.

Face it - he is right.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240199

On 4/25/2014 4:05 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 4/25/14, 2:50 PM, in article
> j7GdnVQl0LEPRcfOnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/25/2014 1:35 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 4/25/14, 10:46 AM, in article
>>> dvOdnZcx5ZTuAsfOnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Don't bin him.
>>>>>> Just don't reply to Snatch Clown.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's just trying to bait you into one of his circus rings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Binning him is so much easier. None of what he says is worth anything. I
>>>>> mean the guy wants me to refute a renowned scholar like Jon Stewart.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So now he's thinking that the comic Jon Stewart is now credible?
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!!
>>>
>>> I am noting his comments are unrefuted... and, with video and the like, well
>>> supported:
>>>
>>> http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/bundy-blm/daily-show-host-stewart-takes-sh
>>> ots-bundy
>>>
>>> http://mediamatters.org/video/2014/04/22/watch-the-daily-show-demolish-hanni
>>> tys-hypocrit/198963
>>>
>>> http://uproxx.com/tv/2014/04/sean-hannity-challenged-jon-stewart-to-a-fight-
>>> over-cliven-bundy-and-jon-stewart-cold-knocked-his-ass-out/
>>>
>>> But you and Silver Slimer have a *great* rebuttal... comes down to
>>> "Wahhhhhhh!"
>>>
>>> LOL! Really, do you have anything other than whining about the source?
>>> Anything to even suggest you understand the situation? The four videos at
>>> those three links are excellent and describe the situation very well.
>>>
>>>
>> Guffaw!!!  Yet dummies like you now accept a standup comic as THE
>> authority??  Mostly the reasons why he is not refuted is maybe no one is
>> taking the guy seriously.
>> Of course stupid people like you would believe the management media on
>> anything they broadcast as the gospel truth, eh?
>>
>> LOL!!!
>>
> 
> No rebuttal from you. His videos stand fully unrefuted.
> 
> Face it - he is right.
> 
> 
You're a dumb ass,... no rebuttal from you either, dickweed.

<***PLONK***>

I hope that SS will do the same.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#240209

On 4/25/14, 4:00 PM, in article
gP2dna72Fq-JdMfOnZ2dnUVZ_hOdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com>
wrote:

>>> Guffaw!!!  Yet dummies like you now accept a standup comic as THE
>>> authority??  Mostly the reasons why he is not refuted is maybe no one is
>>> taking the guy seriously.
>>> Of course stupid people like you would believe the management media on
>>> anything they broadcast as the gospel truth, eh?
>>> 
>>> LOL!!!
>>> 
>> 
>> No rebuttal from you. His videos stand fully unrefuted.
>> 
>> Face it - he is right.
>> 
>> 
> You're a dumb ass,... no rebuttal from you either, dickweed.

I am not saying he is wrong... so no need to rebut.

Wow... how sad you need that explained to you.
 
> <***PLONK***>
> 
> I hope that SS will do the same.

Me too! Better yet would be for him to try to support his claims - but that
is *not* going to happen.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web