Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242580 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 415 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:11 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:35 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 11:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 12:46 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:43 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 14:59 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 18:09 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 22:02 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:40 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:46 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:48 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:42 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:49 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Richard Starkey <nobody@ringo.jpunix.net> - 2014-05-08 14:23 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 21:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 12:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... John Kennerson <nobody@isis.cpunk.us> - 2014-05-08 15:25 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 12:34 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:46 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-08 11:17 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 14:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 13:22 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-08 19:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 18:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:09 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 07:40 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 08:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 09:51 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 09:57 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:16 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:05 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:23 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 10:43 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 11:36 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 19:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 18:25 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:13 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:34 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:35 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:43 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-09 08:18 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-09 07:07 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 10:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 09:20 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 11:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 07:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:10 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:27 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 10:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 10:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 17:42 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:12 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-09 10:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 12:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:30 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:27 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:39 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 11:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:05 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:14 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 12:07 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:05 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-10 09:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 01:45 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 20:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 22:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 22:06 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 05:06 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 07:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:32 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:35 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:38 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 09:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 16:03 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:00 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 11:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:12 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 08:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:50 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:30 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:37 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 13:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:20 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:49 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 11:56 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 12:25 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 12:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:03 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 13:19 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 12:02 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:34 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 16:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 15:28 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:07 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:12 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 16:10 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 21:40 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-13 04:24 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 13:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 14:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:52 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:53 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 19:41 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:09 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 16:50 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:21 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:28 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:17 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:04 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 22:25 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:22 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:38 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:49 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:08 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:22 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:03 -0400
Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 19:02 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 22:31 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:15 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 09:04 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:23 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 16:48 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:13 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:26 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:35 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:54 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 17:01 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 22:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-16 18:06 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 10:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 16:45 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 09:01 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 21:32 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:47 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 19:30 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:34 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-18 14:02 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:53 +0000
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:47 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 07:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:24 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-18 01:07 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 22:55 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 20:29 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 18:56 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:26 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:01 -0700
Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:38 -0400
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:59 +0200
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:16 -0400
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 16:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:18 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:20 -0600
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:46 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 17:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:07 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:30 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 14:52 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 17:09 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:55 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:20 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:39 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 10:47 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-17 20:49 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 11:57 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-17 20:08 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 12:29 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2014-05-18 11:44 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-18 08:45 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:40 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:27 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-17 16:24 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 11:14 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-18 09:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:36 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:42 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 17:47 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 09:15 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:28 +0000
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 11:53 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-18 23:09 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 16:37 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:11 -0400
I like MicroSoft -because- it's mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 14:50 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:35 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:56 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:12 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:43 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:43 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:13 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:34 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 18:21 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:27 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2014-05-15 16:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:42 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:00 -0400
DirectX 11.1 is now part of the Windows 8 SDK. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:21 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jesse <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> - 2014-05-14 22:02 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregoryhall@home.fake> - 2014-05-15 18:53 -0400
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-26 22:55 -0400
$999 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-26 21:32 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:20 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-15 04:33 -0700
I just bought a $430 graphics card. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 13:16 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:31 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:12 -0700
The Linux advantage. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 20:02 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-15 09:46 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 02:09 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 11:29 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage.  Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 09:55 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:50 -0400
When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:35 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-15 09:56 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 10:05 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-15 12:00 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 22:47 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:05 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 04:57 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:10 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:21 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:45 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:57 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:40 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:54 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:53 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 10:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 10:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 21:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-21 07:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 16:22 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:29 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 18:53 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 12:11 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Tralfaz <directly_above_the_center_of_the_earth@santas_deer_poop_too_much.org> - 2014-05-20 16:24 +0000
The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-20 13:02 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 17:12 +0000
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:26 -0700
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:36 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 14:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 14:19 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:20 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:43 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:17 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:52 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:44 +0200
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:25 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:55 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:17 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:35 -0600
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:00 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-16 11:52 +0000
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 12:01 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 09:15 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. "Steve Carroll." <fretwizzin@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 09:19 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 11:06 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:27 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:57 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:18 -0400
The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:26 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:49 -0400
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 22:25 -0400
Compared to the internet, people are boring. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 20:25 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:33 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:51 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:40 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:40 -0700
I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:07 -0700
Re: I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:17 -0400
100% off Visual Studio Ultimate 2013, today only. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:59 -0700
Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 15:52 -0700
Re: Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 17:11 -0600
Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0700
Re: Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 19:54 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:52 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:20 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:39 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:29 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:39 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:11 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:24 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-09 00:53 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-08 21:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:35 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400
Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21 Next page →
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 16:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87wqdv2g1t.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242763 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > On 5/9/2014 9:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >> >>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> >>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>> >>> >>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>> >>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>> being paid for his work. >> >> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. > > Yep. It's always been that way. > > Please post some of the juicy stuff here so we can have a laugh! > "+1" - could always do with a laugh. I bet Creepy Chris will have to dab a tear. He was never the same after Roy Bighead dumped him for sucking up to Kohlkopf... -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 10:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkiq5p$nao$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242764 |
On 5/9/2014 10:16 AM, Hadron wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > >> On 5/9/2014 9:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>> >>>> >>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>> >>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>> being paid for his work. >>> >>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >> >> Yep. It's always been that way. >> >> Please post some of the juicy stuff here so we can have a laugh! >> > > "+1" - could always do with a laugh. I bet Creepy Chris will have to dab > a tear. He was never the same after Roy Bighead dumped him for sucking > up to Kohlkopf... Priceless!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 11:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <irmtp1jcsf$.1g2sh9w0us2h0$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242777 |
On Fri, 09 May 2014 10:53:36 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 5/9/2014 10:16 AM, Hadron wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: >> >>> On 5/9/2014 9:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>> >>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>> being paid for his work. >>>> >>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>> >>> Yep. It's always been that way. >>> >>> Please post some of the juicy stuff here so we can have a laugh! >>> >> >> "+1" - could always do with a laugh. I bet Creepy Chris will have to dab >> a tear. He was never the same after Roy Bighead dumped him for sucking >> up to Kohlkopf... > > > Priceless! Yea. Ahlstrom took it pretty hard when Spamowitz sent him packing to the curb. Look here for one example the paranoia: http://techrights.org/2014/05/09/microsoft-patent-trolls-pr/ "What we truly have a problem with is obscene media distortion. No man bribes the press and even bribes blogs as much as Gates does."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 11:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkirm6$3kd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242778 |
On 5/9/2014 11:05 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > Look here for one example the paranoia: > > http://techrights.org/2014/05/09/microsoft-patent-trolls-pr/ > > "What we truly have a problem with is obscene media distortion. No > man bribes the press and even bribes blogs as much as Gates does." I read the entire article... Holy Shit! Virtually every sentence is some pie-in-the-sky lunacy and paranoia and lie. "Gates even bribes The Guardian (millions of dollars paid to ensure he never gets criticised there, not to mention a lot of anti-Google bias these days)." List of 235 articles about or mentioning Gates: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/billgates Took me about 1 minute to find this: "Bill Gates preaches the aid gospel, but is he just a hypocrite?" http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/06/bill-gates-preaches-fighting-poverty-hypocrite-microsoft-tax Spamowitz is a lying idiot, like so many Linux "advocates".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 17:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87zjirdlii.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242783 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > On 5/9/2014 11:05 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > >> Look here for one example the paranoia: >> >> http://techrights.org/2014/05/09/microsoft-patent-trolls-pr/ >> >> "What we truly have a problem with is obscene media distortion. No >> man bribes the press and even bribes blogs as much as Gates does." > > I read the entire article... Holy Shit! Virtually every sentence is some > pie-in-the-sky lunacy and paranoia and lie. > > "Gates even bribes The Guardian (millions of dollars paid to ensure he never > gets criticised there, not to mention a lot of anti-Google bias these days)." > > List of 235 articles about or mentioning Gates: > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/billgates > > Took me about 1 minute to find this: > > "Bill Gates preaches the aid gospel, but is he just a hypocrite?" > > http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/06/bill-gates-preaches-fighting-poverty-hypocrite-microsoft-tax > > Spamowitz is a lying idiot, like so many Linux "advocates". > Possibly even the MOST dishonest. And that's quite a feat! That article is quite simply insane. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 11:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1057xtwtc4pa6.1k4a6pce9a8m$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242783 |
On Fri, 09 May 2014 11:19:25 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 5/9/2014 11:05 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > >> Look here for one example the paranoia: >> >> http://techrights.org/2014/05/09/microsoft-patent-trolls-pr/ >> >> "What we truly have a problem with is obscene media distortion. No >> man bribes the press and even bribes blogs as much as Gates does." > > > I read the entire article... Holy Shit! Virtually every sentence is > some pie-in-the-sky lunacy and paranoia and lie. > > > "Gates even bribes The Guardian (millions of dollars paid to ensure he > never gets criticised there, not to mention a lot of anti-Google bias > these days)." > > List of 235 articles about or mentioning Gates: > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/billgates > > > Took me about 1 minute to find this: > > "Bill Gates preaches the aid gospel, but is he just a hypocrite?" > > http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/06/bill-gates-preaches-fighting-poverty-hypocrite-microsoft-tax > Spamowitz is a lying idiot, like so many Linux "advocates". I think he is mentally ill, like so many Linux "advocates".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 17:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <874n0zf04x.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242778 |
flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes: > On Fri, 09 May 2014 10:53:36 -0400, DFS wrote: > >> On 5/9/2014 10:16 AM, Hadron wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 5/9/2014 9:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>>> >>>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>>> being paid for his work. >>>>> >>>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>>> >>>> Yep. It's always been that way. >>>> >>>> Please post some of the juicy stuff here so we can have a laugh! >>>> >>> >>> "+1" - could always do with a laugh. I bet Creepy Chris will have to dab >>> a tear. He was never the same after Roy Bighead dumped him for sucking >>> up to Kohlkopf... >> >> >> Priceless! > > Yea. > Ahlstrom took it pretty hard when Spamowitz sent him packing to the > curb. > > Look here for one example the paranoia: > > http://techrights.org/2014/05/09/microsoft-patent-trolls-pr/ > > "What we truly have a problem with is obscene media distortion. No > man bribes the press and even bribes blogs as much as Gates does." Someone should send that to a mainstream paper for publication. How does he get away with such bullshit? Insane doesn't even begin to cover it. Gates should sue. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 11:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkit9f$gim$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242784 |
On 5/9/2014 11:21 AM, Hadron wrote: > flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes: > >> On Fri, 09 May 2014 10:53:36 -0400, DFS wrote: >> >>> On 5/9/2014 10:16 AM, Hadron wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>>>> being paid for his work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>>>> >>>>> Yep. It's always been that way. >>>>> >>>>> Please post some of the juicy stuff here so we can have a laugh! >>>>> >>>> >>>> "+1" - could always do with a laugh. I bet Creepy Chris will have to dab >>>> a tear. He was never the same after Roy Bighead dumped him for sucking >>>> up to Kohlkopf... >>> >>> >>> Priceless! >> >> Yea. >> Ahlstrom took it pretty hard when Spamowitz sent him packing to the >> curb. >> >> Look here for one example the paranoia: >> >> http://techrights.org/2014/05/09/microsoft-patent-trolls-pr/ >> >> "What we truly have a problem with is obscene media distortion. No >> man bribes the press and even bribes blogs as much as Gates does." > > Someone should send that to a mainstream paper for publication. How does > he get away with such bullshit? Roy gets away with it because he's a crazy, lying smudge of shit that nobody - except like-minded idiots Goob and Mark Bilk - reads or takes seriously. Part of proving libel is the lies have to harm the reputation of the intended victim... but the only reputation being harmed here is Spamowitz's. > Insane doesn't even begin to cover it. It really doesn't. He's gone off the deep end, much worse than I remember him from his cola days. > Gates should sue. I think so, too, but Gates is way too busy to worry about powerless weenie naysayers like Spamowitz and Homer and Ballard. Though it would be funny as hell to read about Spamowitz being bankrupted by a libel suit filed by Gates.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 11:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <2jsvp40pavyb.fwgijrdjlsjf$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242784 |
On Fri, 09 May 2014 17:21:50 +0200, Hadron wrote: > flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes: > >> On Fri, 09 May 2014 10:53:36 -0400, DFS wrote: >> >>> On 5/9/2014 10:16 AM, Hadron wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>>>> being paid for his work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>>>> >>>>> Yep. It's always been that way. >>>>> >>>>> Please post some of the juicy stuff here so we can have a laugh! >>>>> >>>> >>>> "+1" - could always do with a laugh. I bet Creepy Chris will have to dab >>>> a tear. He was never the same after Roy Bighead dumped him for sucking >>>> up to Kohlkopf... >>> >>> >>> Priceless! >> >> Yea. >> Ahlstrom took it pretty hard when Spamowitz sent him packing to the >> curb. >> >> Look here for one example the paranoia: >> >> http://techrights.org/2014/05/09/microsoft-patent-trolls-pr/ >> >> "What we truly have a problem with is obscene media distortion. No >> man bribes the press and even bribes blogs as much as Gates does." > > Someone should send that to a mainstream paper for publication. How does > he get away with such bullshit? > > Insane doesn't even begin to cover it. > > Gates should sue. A lot of people should sue Spamowitz.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 10:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkipje$hbs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242758 |
On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: > >> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >> >>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>> adding another A to Asshole. >> >> >> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >> >> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >> being paid for his work. > > Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. > All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as it is to create a quick database of such articles. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 11:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <zemdnQAkzuW3j_DOnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #242771 |
On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >> >>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> >>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>> >>> >>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>> >>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>> being paid for his work. >> >> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. > > Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post > articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on > us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free > software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as > it is to create a quick database of such articles. > > Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without anyone being the wiser. Just my 2 cents. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4bd7d975-fb01-438e-89d9-31cadd6bcdcb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #242819 |
On Friday, May 9, 2014 5:36:35 PM UTC, GreyCloud wrote: > On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > > > On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > > >> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me > > >>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", > > >>>> adding another A to Asshole. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. > > >>> > > >>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out > > >>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, > > >>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on > > >>> being paid for his work. > > >> > > >> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. > > >> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. > > > > > > Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post > > > articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on > > > us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free > > > software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as > > > it is to create a quick database of such articles. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without > > anyone being the wiser. The NSA already cracked Snit. > Just my 2 cents. Which is more than Snit made last year. > > > -- > > We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters > > will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks > > to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997 Another forum ruined by Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 http://prescottcomputerguy.com The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 19:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkjnds$g2q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242819 |
On 14-05-09 01:36 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>> >>>> >>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>> >>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>> being paid for his work. >>> >>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >> >> Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post >> articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on >> us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free >> software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as >> it is to create a quick database of such articles. >> >> > Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without > anyone being the wiser. Just my 2 cents. Well, the FSF and RMS are both claiming that systems with software which is exclusively free will keep you safe. I'm not sure how true that is but it definitely removes the potential that your software is spying on you. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 18:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <z9Wdnbcq6Lme7_DOnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #242873 |
On 5/9/2014 5:13 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-09 01:36 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>> >>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>> being paid for his work. >>>> >>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>> >>> Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post >>> articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on >>> us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free >>> software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as >>> it is to create a quick database of such articles. >>> >>> >> Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without >> anyone being the wiser. Just my 2 cents. > > Well, the FSF and RMS are both claiming that systems with software which > is exclusively free will keep you safe. I'm not sure how true that is > but it definitely removes the potential that your software is spying on you. > Software that spies on you is different from when they just want enter and snoop around. Plus they gather everything that goes over the internet anyway. I think the only truly secure os out there are the big mainframes that have good hardware and then OpenVMS, which you can't buy now, tho it is still being sold only to the government. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-10 16:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <05b9e306-4e67-4706-a91c-012e978ddc68@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #242915 |
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 12:25:33 AM UTC, GreyCloud wrote: > On 5/9/2014 5:13 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > > > On 14-05-09 01:36 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > > >> On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > > >>> On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > > >>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me > > >>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", > > >>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out > > >>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, > > >>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on > > >>>>> being paid for his work. > > >>>> > > >>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. > > >>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. > > >>> > > >>> Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post > > >>> articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on > > >>> us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free > > >>> software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as > > >>> it is to create a quick database of such articles. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without > > >> anyone being the wiser. Just my 2 cents. > > > > > > Well, the FSF and RMS are both claiming that systems with software which > > > is exclusively free will keep you safe. I'm not sure how true that is > > > but it definitely removes the potential that your software is spying on you. > > > > > Software that spies on you is different from when they just want enter > > and snoop around. Plus they gather everything that goes over the > > internet anyway. > > I think the only truly secure os out there are the big mainframes that > > have good hardware and then OpenVMS, which you can't buy now, tho it is > > still being sold only to the government. > In other words Snit is an idiot. > > > > -- > > We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters > > will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks > > to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997 Another forum ruined by Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 http://prescottcomputerguy.com The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-10 09:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bt6qllF4u3rU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #242873 |
On 2014-05-09 23:13:00 +0000, Silver Slimer said: > On 14-05-09 01:36 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>> >>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>> being paid for his work. >>>> >>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>> >>> Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post >>> articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on >>> us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free >>> software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as >>> it is to create a quick database of such articles. >>> >>> >> Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without >> anyone being the wiser. Just my 2 cents. > > Well, the FSF and RMS are both claiming that systems with software which > is exclusively free will keep you safe. I'm not sure how true that is > but it definitely removes the potential that your software is spying on you. Of course you are free to believe that, but I doubt that is the reality. If you are on the internet with any OS and the NSA decides they want to look at your system, you can nearly bet the farm that they can and will do just that. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-10 10:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <otyy6vkif1dv$.160fo5q2shgnv$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242959 |
On Sat, 10 May 2014 09:16:23 -0500, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > On 2014-05-09 23:13:00 +0000, Silver Slimer said: > >> On 14-05-09 01:36 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>>> >>>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>>> being paid for his work. >>>>> >>>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>>> >>>> Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post >>>> articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on >>>> us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free >>>> software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as >>>> it is to create a quick database of such articles. >>>> >>>> >>> Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without >>> anyone being the wiser. Just my 2 cents. >> >> Well, the FSF and RMS are both claiming that systems with software which >> is exclusively free will keep you safe. I'm not sure how true that is >> but it definitely removes the potential that your software is spying on you. > > Of course you are free to believe that, but I doubt that is the > reality. If you are on the internet with any OS and the NSA decides > they want to look at your system, you can nearly bet the farm that they > can and will do just that. See Heart Bleed for examples. There have been reports that the NSA knew about this bug for years but never reported it. I have my doubts, but anything is possible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-10 16:39 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87wqdt8zqq.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242963 |
flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes: > On Sat, 10 May 2014 09:16:23 -0500, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > >> On 2014-05-09 23:13:00 +0000, Silver Slimer said: >> >>> On 14-05-09 01:36 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>>>> being paid for his work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>>>> >>>>> Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post >>>>> articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on >>>>> us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free >>>>> software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as >>>>> it is to create a quick database of such articles. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without >>>> anyone being the wiser. Just my 2 cents. >>> >>> Well, the FSF and RMS are both claiming that systems with software which >>> is exclusively free will keep you safe. I'm not sure how true that is >>> but it definitely removes the potential that your software is spying on you. >> >> Of course you are free to believe that, but I doubt that is the >> reality. If you are on the internet with any OS and the NSA decides >> they want to look at your system, you can nearly bet the farm that they >> can and will do just that. > > See Heart Bleed for examples. > There have been reports that the NSA knew about this bug for years > but never reported it. > I have my doubts, but anything is possible. Regardless. If the NSA want to hack into your system they can. The SSL bug was found. For all we know there are thousands of similar loopholes. They continue to be found and they continue to be added in. This many eyes shit is just that. The lack of formal methods being used for proving a system in the Open Software is worrying for many. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-10 10:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <biy8g67dzfkx$.k3mvfjadmkvq.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242967 |
On Sat, 10 May 2014 16:39:09 +0200, Hadron wrote: > flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes: > >> On Sat, 10 May 2014 09:16:23 -0500, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >> >>> On 2014-05-09 23:13:00 +0000, Silver Slimer said: >>> >>>> On 14-05-09 01:36 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>> On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>>>>> being paid for his work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>>>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post >>>>>> articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on >>>>>> us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free >>>>>> software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as >>>>>> it is to create a quick database of such articles. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without >>>>> anyone being the wiser. Just my 2 cents. >>>> >>>> Well, the FSF and RMS are both claiming that systems with software which >>>> is exclusively free will keep you safe. I'm not sure how true that is >>>> but it definitely removes the potential that your software is spying on you. >>> >>> Of course you are free to believe that, but I doubt that is the >>> reality. If you are on the internet with any OS and the NSA decides >>> they want to look at your system, you can nearly bet the farm that they >>> can and will do just that. >> >> See Heart Bleed for examples. >> There have been reports that the NSA knew about this bug for years >> but never reported it. >> I have my doubts, but anything is possible. > > Regardless. If the NSA want to hack into your system they can. The SSL > bug was found. For all we know there are thousands of similar > loopholes. They continue to be found and they continue to be added > in. This many eyes shit is just that. The lack of formal methods being > used for proving a system in the Open Software is worrying for many. Yep. When organizations like the NSA, MI5, CIA etc are involved, both methods can be exploited.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-10 09:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <GI-dnSCcm5y02vPOnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #242969 |
On 5/10/2014 8:47 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Sat, 10 May 2014 16:39:09 +0200, Hadron wrote: > >> flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes: >> >>> On Sat, 10 May 2014 09:16:23 -0500, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >>> >>>> On 2014-05-09 23:13:00 +0000, Silver Slimer said: >>>> >>>>> On 14-05-09 01:36 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> On 5/9/2014 8:43 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>> On 14-05-09 09:57 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:03 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2014 9:36 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 'Guess what! Roy has refused to review some work because "they want me >>>>>>>>>> to work for free" LOL. Add another H to Hypocrite!' - "Hadron", >>>>>>>>>> adding another A to Asshole. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And I'll add another T to Twat: turdv. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Figure a hypocrite chump like you would attack Hadron for pointing out >>>>>>>>> the hypocrisy of another cola "advocate" - in this case Roy Spamowitz, >>>>>>>>> who didn't mind freeloading the unpaid work of others but insisted on >>>>>>>>> being paid for his work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Spamowitz has really gone off the rails lately. >>>>>>>> All this ultra paranoid crap on his site. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it worse than mine (www.silverlips.ca)? In my case, I simply post >>>>>>> articles which demonstrate evidence that our "overlords" are spying on >>>>>>> us and I regularly recommend the use of GNU/Linux to escape that, free >>>>>>> software in particular. My hope is not to encourage paranoia as much as >>>>>>> it is to create a quick database of such articles. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Unfortunately, the NSA can crack and break into any system without >>>>>> anyone being the wiser. Just my 2 cents. >>>>> >>>>> Well, the FSF and RMS are both claiming that systems with software which >>>>> is exclusively free will keep you safe. I'm not sure how true that is >>>>> but it definitely removes the potential that your software is spying on you. >>>> >>>> Of course you are free to believe that, but I doubt that is the >>>> reality. If you are on the internet with any OS and the NSA decides >>>> they want to look at your system, you can nearly bet the farm that they >>>> can and will do just that. >>> >>> See Heart Bleed for examples. >>> There have been reports that the NSA knew about this bug for years >>> but never reported it. >>> I have my doubts, but anything is possible. >> >> Regardless. If the NSA want to hack into your system they can. The SSL >> bug was found. For all we know there are thousands of similar >> loopholes. They continue to be found and they continue to be added >> in. This many eyes shit is just that. The lack of formal methods being >> used for proving a system in the Open Software is worrying for many. > > Yep. > When organizations like the NSA, MI5, CIA etc are involved, both > methods can be exploited. > That and the fact that the Utah center is now using a quantum computer system to do the cracking. If they are talking about it,... well it has been done already. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web