Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243146 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-12 12:36 -0400 |
| Last post | 2014-05-13 09:08 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 211 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:36 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 12:18 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:07 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 14:53 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-12 21:25 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 14:47 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:23 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:12 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 14:38 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 15:13 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:08 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:19 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:51 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:23 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:48 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:57 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:20 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:22 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:40 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:19 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-14 00:49 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 19:09 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:14 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-14 20:55 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 06:47 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:58 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-14 06:48 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 10:27 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 10:53 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:25 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:28 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:42 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 22:39 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 19:41 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:46 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:04 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:41 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:22 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:37 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 18:38 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:52 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:54 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:59 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:24 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:32 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:15 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:13 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:21 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:26 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:31 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:35 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:41 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:50 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:36 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:09 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:59 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:47 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-14 20:51 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:21 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 17:38 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 14:48 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 14:24 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:48 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:19 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 16:53 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:14 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:19 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:18 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:16 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:12 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:24 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:28 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:37 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:44 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:48 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:51 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:51 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 00:29 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:16 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:13 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:32 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:49 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 20:10 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 20:21 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 20:34 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:49 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 22:58 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 23:15 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 23:19 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 20:29 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:19 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:56 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:18 -0700
Real Life girl$$$ aren't that hot. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 03:21 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:49 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:17 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:30 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:32 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 07:02 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:17 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:06 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:10 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:41 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:19 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:13 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:40 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-12 21:22 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:08 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:13 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 11:18 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 13:52 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 12:55 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 17:47 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 20:09 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 22:22 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 19:39 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 07:38 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 10:24 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:30 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 19:43 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 11:21 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:16 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 15:37 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 16:56 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:01 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-13 11:16 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:18 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:38 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:27 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 09:42 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 18:35 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 10:39 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:41 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 09:45 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:33 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 15:58 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:25 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:12 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:29 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 17:35 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 18:40 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:48 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:50 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:42 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 17:57 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:07 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:51 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 18:55 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 14:41 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-14 20:48 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 14:50 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 14:51 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 12:04 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 12:07 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:30 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 11:55 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 10:09 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:49 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:54 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:23 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:39 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:33 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:26 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 18:51 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 18:33 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:21 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 09:38 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:21 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 15:54 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 12:14 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 18:36 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 17:46 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:54 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:03 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 19:34 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:44 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:27 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:56 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:14 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 10:18 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 11:31 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:59 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:02 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 11:11 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:17 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:39 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:37 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 11:45 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:58 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:50 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 09:08 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-13 11:06 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 11:11 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:13 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 11:30 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-13 11:34 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:38 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:48 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 11:21 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 10:28 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:43 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 09:08 -0700
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <13dmwxe82jo90$.182ylzqela4ij$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243713 |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:48:19 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-14 05:44 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:37:12 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 14-05-14 05:28 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:24:28 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 14-05-14 04:12 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>>>>>> On 14-05-13 04:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Consoles have been a driving force in the games market for over >>>>>>>>>> a decade. If you are going to blither about something, at least >>>>>>>>>> pretend that you have half a clue about it. Mobile platforms have >>>>>>>>>> also been the new thing. There was movement in this direction even >>>>>>>>>> before the smartphones became big and splashy in the news media. >>>>>>>>>> Like I already said. If you are going to blather baout something, at >>>>>>>>>> least pretend that you have half a clue about it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Consoles have NOT been the driving force in the games market at all. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ...more clueless nonsense from the clueless idiot slimer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Whodathunkit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only idiot here is you. How do you explain the fact that every >>>>>>> single innovation in gaming started on the PC if "consoles have been a >>>>>> >>>>>> The industry shifted to consoles a long time ago. The fact that you >>>>>> can come up with some really ancient examples of "innovation" doesn't really >>>>>> alter this. >>>>>> >>>>>> I mean come on... "hard drive installs". >>>>>> >>>>>> That one is straight out of the 80s. >>>>> >>>>> And it only came to consoles with the original XBOX in 2001. Therefore, >>>>> consoles are 20 years behind on capability and 5 years behind on >>>>> graphics technology. It's too bad that you know nothing of the subject >>>>> and insist on continuing to make an ass out of yourself. You're free to >>>>> pinpoint an area where consoles innovated before the PC though. The only >>>>> one you can realistically pinpoint is the Wii control mechanism. >>>> >>>> And even as far as control systems are concerned, advanced ones >>>> started on the PC as well. I had a friend who once had a complete set >>>> of controls for his flight simulator games. Stick, pedals, controls >>>> etc. Basically just like a real plane. >>>> >>>> Far more than just a joystick with a bunch of buttons. >>> >>> I'm sure the Intellivision JEDIDIAH just spent his life savings on seems >>> very innovative with its 2 side buttons and keypad with game inserts. >>> After all, it's the first-ever 16-bit console. >> >> Wow! That brings back memories :) >> Probably state of the art for Jeb :) >> >> lol! > > It's way better than the Atari Video Computer System he's been playing > with until last week. Its version of Burger Time is > WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY better. lol !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 16:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnln7pbe.us4.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #243694 |
On 2014-05-14, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:
> On 14-05-14 04:12 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>> On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:
>>> On 14-05-13 04:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Consoles have been a driving force in the games market for over
>>>>>> a decade. If you are going to blither about something, at least
>>>>>> pretend that you have half a clue about it. Mobile platforms have
>>>>>> also been the new thing. There was movement in this direction even
>>>>>> before the smartphones became big and splashy in the news media.
>>>>>> Like I already said. If you are going to blather baout something, at
>>>>>> least pretend that you have half a clue about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Consoles have NOT been the driving force in the games market at all.
>>>>
>>>> ...more clueless nonsense from the clueless idiot slimer.
>>>>
>>>> Whodathunkit.
>>>
>>> The only idiot here is you. How do you explain the fact that every
>>> single innovation in gaming started on the PC if "consoles have been a
>>
>> The industry shifted to consoles a long time ago. The fact that you
>> can come up with some really ancient examples of "innovation" doesn't really
>> alter this.
>>
>> I mean come on... "hard drive installs".
>>
>> That one is straight out of the 80s.
>
> And it only came to consoles with the original XBOX in 2001. Therefore,
Yes. 2001.
What year is it now?
[deletia]
On the other hand, it's a pretty retarded thing to crow about. It's
not like that ability to install on a PC hard drive actually gets you
anything. You get to waste gigabytes of space on your hard drive and you
still need the original install media because of all of the bogus DRM
that comes with PC gaming.
NOT having a hard drive actually ends of being less bothersome.
PCs have actually gone BACKWARDS by your own metric.
--
Apple: Because the individual is not statistically meaningful. |||
/ | \
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 00:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87y4y40zbk.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #243717 |
JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> writes: > On 2014-05-14, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >> On 14-05-14 04:12 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>>> On 14-05-13 04:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Consoles have been a driving force in the games market for over >>>>>>> a decade. If you are going to blither about something, at least >>>>>>> pretend that you have half a clue about it. Mobile platforms have >>>>>>> also been the new thing. There was movement in this direction even >>>>>>> before the smartphones became big and splashy in the news media. >>>>>>> Like I already said. If you are going to blather baout something, at >>>>>>> least pretend that you have half a clue about it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Consoles have NOT been the driving force in the games market at all. >>>>> >>>>> ...more clueless nonsense from the clueless idiot slimer. >>>>> >>>>> Whodathunkit. >>>> >>>> The only idiot here is you. How do you explain the fact that every >>>> single innovation in gaming started on the PC if "consoles have been a >>> >>> The industry shifted to consoles a long time ago. The fact that you >>> can come up with some really ancient examples of "innovation" doesn't really >>> alter this. >>> >>> I mean come on... "hard drive installs". >>> >>> That one is straight out of the 80s. >> >> And it only came to consoles with the original XBOX in 2001. Therefore, > > Yes. 2001. > > What year is it now? > > [deletia] > > On the other hand, it's a pretty retarded thing to crow about. It's > not like that ability to install on a PC hard drive actually gets you > anything. You get to waste gigabytes of space on your hard drive and you > still need the original install media because of all of the bogus DRM > that comes with PC gaming. > > NOT having a hard drive actually ends of being less bothersome. > > PCs have actually gone BACKWARDS by your own metric. Oh Jed. You're such a clueless fucking imbecile it's not funny anymore. Waste? You have ZERO idea how big these games are now and what they need to stream etc. It has to be on the HD. Seriously. Why do you insist on talking about things you know absolutely nothing about! Mind you , you did claim two programmers could knock up Halo2 in a fortnight! You're an idiot. Be sure to know that. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 19:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0tgl$961$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243717 |
On 14-05-14 05:51 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> And it only came to consoles with the original XBOX in 2001. Therefore, > > Yes. 2001. > > What year is it now? You seem to be completely missing the point. Since then, the ONLY innovations which are console-specific and didn't appear on the PC first are the Wii controls and the Kinect camera control. The former was a huge success but Nintendo finds itself struggling to make a profit nowadays whereas the latter was a bust and is the very reason people are buying the PS4 over the XBOX One (games reserve too much of their resources for Kinect-specific tasks and cause the games to perform worse than their PS4 counterparts). Every other innovation is PC-specific and the graphics capabilities of even the average PC surpass those of a console to create experiences which won't appear on consoles until 2018 at the soonest. > On the other hand, it's a pretty retarded thing to crow about. It's > not like that ability to install on a PC hard drive actually gets you > anything. You get to waste gigabytes of space on your hard drive and you > still need the original install media because of all of the bogus DRM > that comes with PC gaming. Load times are improved. Loading the entirety of the game from optical media versus loading from the hard disk are two completely different things. The advantages are immeasurable for people who are concerned with excellent frame-rates and delays. I do however agree that the need to insert the CD was awful. It was exactly what prevented me from ONLY playing on the PC. Luckily, Steam and Origin came along to solve that problem. > NOT having a hard drive actually ends of being less bothersome. You obviously haven't thought that one through. > PCs have actually gone BACKWARDS by your own metric. I don't think you've played PC games in a while. Hint: King's Quest is no longer the top-selling title. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 19:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0tat$6la$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243694 |
On 5/14/2014 5:24 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-14 04:12 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>> On 14-05-13 04:18 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>>>> Consoles have been a driving force in the games market for over >>>>>> a decade. If you are going to blither about something, at least >>>>>> pretend that you have half a clue about it. Mobile platforms have >>>>>> also been the new thing. There was movement in this direction even >>>>>> before the smartphones became big and splashy in the news media. >>>>>> Like I already said. If you are going to blather baout something, at >>>>>> least pretend that you have half a clue about it. >>>>> >>>>> Consoles have NOT been the driving force in the games market at all. >>>> >>>> ...more clueless nonsense from the clueless idiot slimer. >>>> >>>> Whodathunkit. >>> >>> The only idiot here is you. How do you explain the fact that every >>> single innovation in gaming started on the PC if "consoles have been a >> >> The industry shifted to consoles a long time ago. The fact that you >> can come up with some really ancient examples of "innovation" doesn't really >> alter this. >> >> I mean come on... "hard drive installs". >> >> That one is straight out of the 80s. > > And it only came to consoles with the original XBOX in 2001. Therefore, > consoles are 20 years behind on capability and 5 years behind on > graphics technology. 5 years behind on graphics sounds about right. PC graphics cards are insanely powerful nowadays. > It's too bad that you know nothing of the subject > and insist on continuing to make an ass out of yourself. You shoulda heard JED the moron babble about Apple: "[Apple] tried as hard as they possibly could with an early lead in both technology and name recognition and STILL don't have much to show for it." I had to remind the blithering bozo: * Apple desktop market share is 7.5% (which is 5x that of Linux). * was the most valuable corporation in the world * stellar reputation for innovation * many years of the highest customer satisfaction ratings in the industry * Fortune magazine's most admired company in the world seven years in a row * 16th Best tech company to work for > You're free to > pinpoint an area where consoles innovated before the PC though. The only > one you can realistically pinpoint is the Wii control mechanism. Kinect controller, maybe? We have a PS3 (wife bought it as Christmas gift). I rarely use it - more to play Blu-Ray discs than anything else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 19:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0ufd$e0r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243733 |
On 14-05-14 07:13 PM, DFS wrote: >> And it only came to consoles with the original XBOX in 2001. Therefore, >> consoles are 20 years behind on capability and 5 years behind on >> graphics technology. > > 5 years behind on graphics sounds about right. > > PC graphics cards are insanely powerful nowadays. If people can content themselves with gameplay topping at 1080p, any midrange 200$ graphics card will do an excellent job for years to come with ultra quality and AT LEAST 30fps. That, on a machine worth no more than 400$. Essentially, 600$ will get you a PC which plays better-looking games than anything a console cooks up for a longer period of time and you can actually use that PC for other things like downloading porn if that's your thing. Hell, you can even save 100$ by not buying Windows and contenting yourself with a GNU/Linux gaming machine. >> It's too bad that you know nothing of the subject >> and insist on continuing to make an ass out of yourself. > > You shoulda heard JED the moron babble about Apple: > > "[Apple] tried as hard as they possibly could with an early lead in both > technology and name recognition and STILL don't have much to show for it." They have the most dedicated customers in the world actually. People proudly stick the Apple logo on their cars, insist on buying even more hardware from the same company after the initial purchase and get a certain sense of smugness from the fact that they purchased an Apple product. Apple's cool factor, alone, is a lot to show for it. > I had to remind the blithering bozo: > > * Apple desktop market share is 7.5% (which is 5x that of Linux). If I'm not mistaken, it's actually higher, closer to 9.5% or 10%. However, my numbers might not be as recent as yours. > * was the most valuable corporation in the world More valuable than Microsoft with more money in the bank. > * stellar reputation for innovation This might not be true for much longer. As it is, Tim Cook has been absolutely awful on that front. Apple is quickly turning into the post-Steve Jobs Apple from 1985 to 1997. While I don't think Apple will ever go bankrupt, they will definitely hurt their reputation if they continue to be the status quo company they currently are. > * many years of the highest customer satisfaction ratings > in the industry Every article I've read agrees with this assessment. > * Fortune magazine's most admired company in the world > seven years in a row Absolutely. >> You're free to >> pinpoint an area where consoles innovated before the PC though. The only >> one you can realistically pinpoint is the Wii control mechanism. > > Kinect controller, maybe? Absolutely, but it wouldn't be fair to Nintendo not to mention the Wii controls. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 19:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0vee$j0s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243739 |
On 5/14/2014 7:32 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-14 07:13 PM, DFS wrote: > >>> And it only came to consoles with the original XBOX in 2001. Therefore, >>> consoles are 20 years behind on capability and 5 years behind on >>> graphics technology. >> >> 5 years behind on graphics sounds about right. >> >> PC graphics cards are insanely powerful nowadays. > > If people can content themselves with gameplay topping at 1080p, any > midrange 200$ graphics card will do an excellent job for years to come > with ultra quality and AT LEAST 30fps. That, on a machine worth no more > than 400$. Essentially, 600$ will get you a PC which plays > better-looking games than anything a console cooks up for a longer > period of time and you can actually use that PC for other things like > downloading porn if that's your thing. Of course that's my thing. Did you hear they wanted to do a study of porn, but needed a control group of men that didn't watch porn. They couldn't find any. heh! > Hell, you can even save 100$ by > not buying Windows and contenting yourself with a GNU/Linux gaming machine. I haven't tried any Linux games in a couple years at least. They used to have egoboo and chromium and XMoto and Frozen Bubble and TuxRacer. Maybe it'll improve with Valve's supposed conversion to Linux (not that they would ever ruin the company by discontinuing sales and development for Windows and XBox). >>> It's too bad that you know nothing of the subject >>> and insist on continuing to make an ass out of yourself. >> >> You shoulda heard JED the moron babble about Apple: >> >> "[Apple] tried as hard as they possibly could with an early lead in both >> technology and name recognition and STILL don't have much to show for it." > > They have the most dedicated customers in the world actually. People > proudly stick the Apple logo on their cars, insist on buying even more > hardware from the same company after the initial purchase and get a > certain sense of smugness from the fact that they purchased an Apple > product. I always hear Apple devotees referred to as smug or iCultists, etc., but I haven't actually ever talked to one. Even the Apple Store employees I talked to weren't like that. > Apple's cool factor, alone, is a lot to show for it. They earned it. >> I had to remind the blithering bozo: >> >> * Apple desktop market share is 7.5% (which is 5x that of Linux). > > If I'm not mistaken, it's actually higher, closer to 9.5% or 10%. > However, my numbers might not be as recent as yours. > >> * was the most valuable corporation in the world > > More valuable than Microsoft with more money in the bank. > >> * stellar reputation for innovation > > This might not be true for much longer. As it is, Tim Cook has been > absolutely awful on that front. Apple is quickly turning into the > post-Steve Jobs Apple from 1985 to 1997. While I don't think Apple will > ever go bankrupt, they will definitely hurt their reputation if they > continue to be the status quo company they currently are. The latest MacPro is extremely innovative. Like no other desktop ever produced. And I read their shares are up 56% since Cook became CEO. Nice. >> * many years of the highest customer satisfaction ratings >> in the industry > > Every article I've read agrees with this assessment. > >> * Fortune magazine's most admired company in the world >> seven years in a row > > Absolutely. > >>> You're free to >>> pinpoint an area where consoles innovated before the PC though. The only >>> one you can realistically pinpoint is the Wii control mechanism. >> >> Kinect controller, maybe? > > Absolutely, but it wouldn't be fair to Nintendo not to mention the Wii > controls. I forgot about them. We have a Wii here at home as well (tucked behind the TV, only used a couple times). The various game control devices - like bow and steering wheel - are kewl.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 20:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll10mj$pks$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243742 |
On 14-05-14 07:49 PM, DFS wrote: >> If people can content themselves with gameplay topping at 1080p, any >> midrange 200$ graphics card will do an excellent job for years to come >> with ultra quality and AT LEAST 30fps. That, on a machine worth no more >> than 400$. Essentially, 600$ will get you a PC which plays >> better-looking games than anything a console cooks up for a longer >> period of time and you can actually use that PC for other things like >> downloading porn if that's your thing. > > Of course that's my thing. > > Did you hear they wanted to do a study of porn, but needed a control > group of men that didn't watch porn. They couldn't find any. > > heh! Any man who says he doesn't watch Internet porn is lying. Any man who says he doesn't know what Cytherea is is a FILTHY liar. :) >> Hell, you can even save 100$ by >> not buying Windows and contenting yourself with a GNU/Linux gaming >> machine. > > I haven't tried any Linux games in a couple years at least. They used > to have egoboo and chromium and XMoto and Frozen Bubble and TuxRacer. > > Maybe it'll improve with Valve's supposed conversion to Linux (not that > they would ever ruin the company by discontinuing sales and development > for Windows and XBox). Steam already has some decent games for GNU/Linux and I'd say that the best one is Metro: Last Light which is an excellent game. However, Valve made DOTA 2 available and it's a gigantic hit with tournament gamers and masochists. Rust is also available as an early access game and it's just a matter of time before it becomes the next best thing (you start off naked, in the woods and have to pick up resources to feed, clothe, shelter and defend yourself... the possibilities are endless). For soccer afficianados, Football Manager 2014 is available and strategy buffs can play Europa Universalis IV. It's not the greatest collection yet but it's pretty damned good when you consider that you didn't have to pay for the OS which allows you to buy and play them. > I always hear Apple devotees referred to as smug or iCultists, etc., but > I haven't actually ever talked to one. Even the Apple Store employees I > talked to weren't like that. The Apple Store employees I talked to actually liked their job and seemed fairly knowledgeable. I was very surprised to be honest. >> This might not be true for much longer. As it is, Tim Cook has been >> absolutely awful on that front. Apple is quickly turning into the >> post-Steve Jobs Apple from 1985 to 1997. While I don't think Apple will >> ever go bankrupt, they will definitely hurt their reputation if they >> continue to be the status quo company they currently are. > > The latest MacPro is extremely innovative. Like no other desktop ever > produced. > > And I read their shares are up 56% since Cook became CEO. Nice. Wow, that's a surprising revelation. I was convinced that things were going downhill. If he's managed to increase the value of the stocks by literally doing absolutely nothing, it speaks volumes about Apple's influence as well as the health of the company. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 20:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <16r6xa0hvop1p.16f6kdutc9ayo.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243750 |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 20:10:58 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-14 07:49 PM, DFS wrote: > >>> If people can content themselves with gameplay topping at 1080p, any >>> midrange 200$ graphics card will do an excellent job for years to come >>> with ultra quality and AT LEAST 30fps. That, on a machine worth no more >>> than 400$. Essentially, 600$ will get you a PC which plays >>> better-looking games than anything a console cooks up for a longer >>> period of time and you can actually use that PC for other things like >>> downloading porn if that's your thing. >> >> Of course that's my thing. >> >> Did you hear they wanted to do a study of porn, but needed a control >> group of men that didn't watch porn. They couldn't find any. >> >> heh! > > Any man who says he doesn't watch Internet porn is lying. Any man who > says he doesn't know what Cytherea is is a FILTHY liar. :) I had to take Greek Mythology in high school and I remember that name. Other than that?????? What puzzles me is why guys need to go to porn to satisfy themselves. Doesn't make sense to me. At least not for average men involved in relationships. Single, geeks, oddballs I can understand. Not judging, just curious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 20:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll1221$10j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243753 |
On 14-05-14 08:21 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2014 20:10:58 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 14-05-14 07:49 PM, DFS wrote: >> >>>> If people can content themselves with gameplay topping at 1080p, any >>>> midrange 200$ graphics card will do an excellent job for years to come >>>> with ultra quality and AT LEAST 30fps. That, on a machine worth no more >>>> than 400$. Essentially, 600$ will get you a PC which plays >>>> better-looking games than anything a console cooks up for a longer >>>> period of time and you can actually use that PC for other things like >>>> downloading porn if that's your thing. >>> >>> Of course that's my thing. >>> >>> Did you hear they wanted to do a study of porn, but needed a control >>> group of men that didn't watch porn. They couldn't find any. >>> >>> heh! >> >> Any man who says he doesn't watch Internet porn is lying. Any man who >> says he doesn't know what Cytherea is is a FILTHY liar. :) > > I had to take Greek Mythology in high school and I remember that > name. Other than that?????? > > What puzzles me is why guys need to go to porn to satisfy themselves. > Doesn't make sense to me. > At least not for average men involved in relationships. > Single, geeks, oddballs I can understand. > Not judging, just curious. My wife has as strong of a sex drive as I do and I could literally have sex whenever I want but let's be honest: I do all the work. Sometimes you just want to sit back and be lazy and Internet porn enforces that. Even if my wife weren't the horny type, I know I could easily get sex elsehwere if the relationship were open because I'm not even remotely ugly but I'm very loyal. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF995D36.374FD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243758 |
On 5/14/14, 5:34 PM, in article ll1221$10j$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >> I had to take Greek Mythology in high school and I remember that >> name. Other than that?????? >> >> What puzzles me is why guys need to go to porn to satisfy themselves. >> Doesn't make sense to me. >> At least not for average men involved in relationships. >> Single, geeks, oddballs I can understand. >> Not judging, just curious. > > My wife has as strong of a sex drive as I do and I could literally have > sex whenever I want but let's be honest: I do all the work. No offense meant but I find that sad. Why doesn't she do "the work" at times too? ... -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 22:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll1ahm$bu6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243753 |
On 5/14/2014 8:21 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2014 20:10:58 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 14-05-14 07:49 PM, DFS wrote: >> >>>> If people can content themselves with gameplay topping at 1080p, any >>>> midrange 200$ graphics card will do an excellent job for years to come >>>> with ultra quality and AT LEAST 30fps. That, on a machine worth no more >>>> than 400$. Essentially, 600$ will get you a PC which plays >>>> better-looking games than anything a console cooks up for a longer >>>> period of time and you can actually use that PC for other things like >>>> downloading porn if that's your thing. >>> >>> Of course that's my thing. >>> >>> Did you hear they wanted to do a study of porn, but needed a control >>> group of men that didn't watch porn. They couldn't find any. >>> >>> heh! >> >> Any man who says he doesn't watch Internet porn is lying. Any man who >> says he doesn't know what Cytherea is is a FILTHY liar. :) I don't recognize her (she's gorgeous here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cytherea_2011.jpg), but I mostly watch xhamster clips. Some of the soft-core shows that come on late at night on Showtime feature real porn actresses I recognize. Then I know they're actually doing it, but the camera editing hides the good action. > I had to take Greek Mythology in high school and I remember that > name. Other than that?????? > > What puzzles me is why guys need to go to porn to satisfy themselves. > Doesn't make sense to me. > At least not for average men involved in relationships. > Single, geeks, oddballs I can understand. > Not judging, just curious. WebMD might have an answer for you: http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/features/why-men-like-porn All I can say is the visuals are nearly as important as the physical. I like to find scenes that remind me of sexual experiences I had in the past.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 23:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6daebtqazojp$.y3dcnk6xfnyj.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243776 |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 22:58:57 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 5/14/2014 8:21 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Wed, 14 May 2014 20:10:58 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 14-05-14 07:49 PM, DFS wrote: >>> >>>>> If people can content themselves with gameplay topping at 1080p, any >>>>> midrange 200$ graphics card will do an excellent job for years to come >>>>> with ultra quality and AT LEAST 30fps. That, on a machine worth no more >>>>> than 400$. Essentially, 600$ will get you a PC which plays >>>>> better-looking games than anything a console cooks up for a longer >>>>> period of time and you can actually use that PC for other things like >>>>> downloading porn if that's your thing. >>>> >>>> Of course that's my thing. >>>> >>>> Did you hear they wanted to do a study of porn, but needed a control >>>> group of men that didn't watch porn. They couldn't find any. >>>> >>>> heh! >>> >>> Any man who says he doesn't watch Internet porn is lying. Any man who >>> says he doesn't know what Cytherea is is a FILTHY liar. :) > > I don't recognize her (she's gorgeous here > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cytherea_2011.jpg), but I mostly watch > xhamster clips. > > Some of the soft-core shows that come on late at night on Showtime > feature real porn actresses I recognize. Then I know they're actually > doing it, but the camera editing hides the good action. > > > >> I had to take Greek Mythology in high school and I remember that >> name. Other than that?????? >> >> What puzzles me is why guys need to go to porn to satisfy themselves. >> Doesn't make sense to me. >> At least not for average men involved in relationships. >> Single, geeks, oddballs I can understand. >> Not judging, just curious. > > WebMD might have an answer for you: > http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/features/why-men-like-porn > > All I can say is the visuals are nearly as important as the physical. I > like to find scenes that remind me of sexual experiences I had in the past. You need to find a partner who understands your needs. Seriously. Women have fantasies as well. And it's not all "Fabian" stuff. Most isn't in fact. Some of it is as "dirty", if you will, as guys have. The focus though is less on physical and more on emotional, scenery etc. When you find a partner you click with, tell her your fantasies and I guarantee you that she will understand. You just need to present it as a desire and not a sleazy event. Let her know it's important to you. Trust me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 23:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll1bnk$h54$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243782 |
On 5/14/2014 11:15 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2014 22:58:57 -0400, DFS wrote: > >> On 5/14/2014 8:21 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 20:10:58 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> On 14-05-14 07:49 PM, DFS wrote: >>>> >>>>>> If people can content themselves with gameplay topping at 1080p, any >>>>>> midrange 200$ graphics card will do an excellent job for years to come >>>>>> with ultra quality and AT LEAST 30fps. That, on a machine worth no more >>>>>> than 400$. Essentially, 600$ will get you a PC which plays >>>>>> better-looking games than anything a console cooks up for a longer >>>>>> period of time and you can actually use that PC for other things like >>>>>> downloading porn if that's your thing. >>>>> >>>>> Of course that's my thing. >>>>> >>>>> Did you hear they wanted to do a study of porn, but needed a control >>>>> group of men that didn't watch porn. They couldn't find any. >>>>> >>>>> heh! >>>> >>>> Any man who says he doesn't watch Internet porn is lying. Any man who >>>> says he doesn't know what Cytherea is is a FILTHY liar. :) >> >> I don't recognize her (she's gorgeous here >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cytherea_2011.jpg), but I mostly watch >> xhamster clips. >> >> Some of the soft-core shows that come on late at night on Showtime >> feature real porn actresses I recognize. Then I know they're actually >> doing it, but the camera editing hides the good action. >> >> >> >>> I had to take Greek Mythology in high school and I remember that >>> name. Other than that?????? >>> >>> What puzzles me is why guys need to go to porn to satisfy themselves. >>> Doesn't make sense to me. >>> At least not for average men involved in relationships. >>> Single, geeks, oddballs I can understand. >>> Not judging, just curious. >> >> WebMD might have an answer for you: >> http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/features/why-men-like-porn >> >> All I can say is the visuals are nearly as important as the physical. I >> like to find scenes that remind me of sexual experiences I had in the past. > > You need to find a partner who understands your needs. > Seriously. > Women have fantasies as well. > And it's not all "Fabian" stuff. Most isn't in fact. > Some of it is as "dirty", if you will, as guys have. > > The focus though is less on physical and more on emotional, scenery > etc. > > When you find a partner you click with, tell her your fantasies and I > guarantee you that she will understand. You just need to present it > as a desire and not a sleazy event. Let her know it's important to > you. > Trust me. I've been married for a long time. My wife isn't into fantasies, or at least has never hinted at them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 20:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF99828F.37528%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243785 |
On 5/14/14, 8:19 PM, in article ll1bnk$h54$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> All I can say is the visuals are nearly as important as the physical. I >>> like to find scenes that remind me of sexual experiences I had in the past. >> >> You need to find a partner who understands your needs. >> Seriously. >> Women have fantasies as well. >> And it's not all "Fabian" stuff. Most isn't in fact. >> Some of it is as "dirty", if you will, as guys have. >> >> The focus though is less on physical and more on emotional, scenery >> etc. >> >> When you find a partner you click with, tell her your fantasies and I >> guarantee you that she will understand. You just need to present it >> as a desire and not a sleazy event. Let her know it's important to >> you. >> Trust me. > > > I've been married for a long time. My wife isn't into fantasies, or at > least has never hinted at them. You can hint. And more. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 08:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87wqdn8sxh.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #243782 |
flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes: > On Wed, 14 May 2014 22:58:57 -0400, DFS wrote: > >> On 5/14/2014 8:21 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 20:10:58 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> On 14-05-14 07:49 PM, DFS wrote: >>>> >>>>>> If people can content themselves with gameplay topping at 1080p, any >>>>>> midrange 200$ graphics card will do an excellent job for years to come >>>>>> with ultra quality and AT LEAST 30fps. That, on a machine worth no more >>>>>> than 400$. Essentially, 600$ will get you a PC which plays >>>>>> better-looking games than anything a console cooks up for a longer >>>>>> period of time and you can actually use that PC for other things like >>>>>> downloading porn if that's your thing. >>>>> >>>>> Of course that's my thing. >>>>> >>>>> Did you hear they wanted to do a study of porn, but needed a control >>>>> group of men that didn't watch porn. They couldn't find any. >>>>> >>>>> heh! >>>> >>>> Any man who says he doesn't watch Internet porn is lying. Any man who >>>> says he doesn't know what Cytherea is is a FILTHY liar. :) >> >> I don't recognize her (she's gorgeous here >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cytherea_2011.jpg), but I mostly watch >> xhamster clips. >> >> Some of the soft-core shows that come on late at night on Showtime >> feature real porn actresses I recognize. Then I know they're actually >> doing it, but the camera editing hides the good action. >> >> >> >>> I had to take Greek Mythology in high school and I remember that >>> name. Other than that?????? >>> >>> What puzzles me is why guys need to go to porn to satisfy themselves. >>> Doesn't make sense to me. >>> At least not for average men involved in relationships. >>> Single, geeks, oddballs I can understand. >>> Not judging, just curious. >> >> WebMD might have an answer for you: >> http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/features/why-men-like-porn >> >> All I can say is the visuals are nearly as important as the physical. I >> like to find scenes that remind me of sexual experiences I had in the past. > > You need to find a partner who understands your needs. Nothing to do with that. It's the thrill factor. You wouldn't watch the SAME clip over and over or the same actors. Well most dont. > Seriously. > Women have fantasies as well. In many cases are worse than men. Women, should they want it, can invariably walk into any bar and find a partner. Its why dads are so protective of their daughters. Its how the world is made. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 08:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll2dib$9a6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243782 |
On 14-05-14 11:15 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > You need to find a partner who understands your needs. > Seriously. > Women have fantasies as well. > And it's not all "Fabian" stuff. Most isn't in fact. > Some of it is as "dirty", if you will, as guys have. My wife has brown eyes but she knows that I have an absolute lust for people with blue eyes. Just that colour, regardless of the rest, will somehow do it for me. That one is somewhat insurmountable. > The focus though is less on physical and more on emotional, scenery > etc. > > When you find a partner you click with, tell her your fantasies and I > guarantee you that she will understand. You just need to present it > as a desire and not a sleazy event. Let her know it's important to > you. > Trust me. Oh, she knows what I like most. The problem is, we can't go that route yet since we don't necessarily want children at the moment. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 17:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF9AA771.3761E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243829 |
On 5/15/14, 5:56 AM, in article ll2dib$9a6$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > On 14-05-14 11:15 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > >> You need to find a partner who understands your needs. >> Seriously. >> Women have fantasies as well. >> And it's not all "Fabian" stuff. Most isn't in fact. >> Some of it is as "dirty", if you will, as guys have. > > My wife has brown eyes but she knows that I have an absolute lust for > people with blue eyes. Just that colour, regardless of the rest, will > somehow do it for me. That one is somewhat insurmountable. Contact lenses. By the way... I have blue eyes. If I ever meet you face-to-face remind me to wear dark sunglasses. :) >> The focus though is less on physical and more on emotional, scenery >> etc. >> >> When you find a partner you click with, tell her your fantasies and I >> guarantee you that she will understand. You just need to present it >> as a desire and not a sleazy event. Let her know it's important to >> you. >> Trust me. > > Oh, she knows what I like most. The problem is, we can't go that route > yet since we don't necessarily want children at the moment. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 03:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Real Life girl$$$ aren't that hot. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.15{3.21.Seattle.2014}> |
| In reply to | #243776 |
@flatfish+++ wrote:
> > What puzzles me is why guys need
> > to go to porn to satisfy themselves.
> > Doesn't make sense to me.
> >
> > At least not for average men involved in relationships.
> > Single, geeks, oddballs I can understand.
> > Not judging, just curious.
#1) Real Life girl$$$ aren't that hot.
#2) They're super·worried about diseases;
i.e. their physical and emotional health.
Then men I know, poor men, don't have girlfreinds,
-- much less 3 super·hot girlfriends that'd let
a man quickly switch between them all, all holes.
Girls what money for that, lots of it, many thousand$$$.
Most won't do it for -any- price.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 08:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll2d5e$7il$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243776 |
On 14-05-14 10:58 PM, DFS wrote: >>> Any man who says he doesn't watch Internet porn is lying. Any man who >>> says he doesn't know what Cytherea is is a FILTHY liar. :) > > I don't recognize her (she's gorgeous here > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cytherea_2011.jpg), but I mostly watch > xhamster clips. > > Some of the soft-core shows that come on late at night on Showtime > feature real porn actresses I recognize. Then I know they're actually > doing it, but the camera editing hides the good action. Cytherea is famous for being the squirting queen. She's like one of those 1980's toys the companies kept pushing at children. Rub it slightly and watch the liquid explode! > WebMD might have an answer for you: > http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/features/why-men-like-porn > > All I can say is the visuals are nearly as important as the physical. I > like to find scenes that remind me of sexual experiences I had in the past. In my case, it's women from my past. It's not that the relationship was better because the relationship I have with my wife is the best I've ever had. However, some of the sex was indeed very memorable and we like to relive it in our own way. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web